Mitchell Shire Climate Emergency Action Plan 2024

Source Base

1. This page analyses the Climate Emergency Action Plan and the Beveridge Central Active Open Space Master Plan because the matched corpus contained two climate-plan extracts and one Beveridge open-space extract. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan_web_2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
2. The two climate-plan extracts refer to the same PDF; this page cites the hyphenated extract as the working CEAP text and treats the underscored extract as a duplicate corroborating copy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan_web_2024-02-07.txt)
3. The previous wiki page was empty, so the rewrite is built directly from extracted source documents. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
4. The requested schema file was not present at C:\pi\schema\CLAUDE.md during drafting, so this page follows the local Mitchell wiki pattern of numbered claims, mechanisms, dependencies, feasibility implications and citations. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
5. Core cross-references are Mitchell Shire, urban forest strategy 2023, mitchell open space strategy, beveridge central active open space master plan, integrated transport strategy, food organics garden organics, environmentally sustainable design, electric vehicles, climate risk, flood management, bushfire management and renewable energy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

Executive Thesis

6. The CEAP is a delivery program for emissions reduction and climate adaptation, not a generic environmental statement. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
7. Mechanism: this thesis matters because the CEAP converts climate policy into targets, asset obligations, staging sequences, cost exposure and development-control implications. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
8. The plan translates the September 2021 climate-emergency acknowledgement into 6 goals, 18 corporate actions and 53 community-supporting actions. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
9. Mechanism: this thesis matters because the CEAP converts climate policy into targets, asset obligations, staging sequences, cost exposure and development-control implications. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
10. The plan has an asymmetric control problem: Council directly controls its assets, fleet, procurement, lighting, landfill boundary and advocacy, while most community emissions sit in homes, transport, agriculture, business and industry. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
11. Mechanism: this thesis matters because the CEAP converts climate policy into targets, asset obligations, staging sequences, cost exposure and development-control implications. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
12. Mitchell Shire had more than 57,000 residents and was expected to more than triple by 2041, so absolute emissions can fall only if per-capita and per-asset intensity fall faster than population and infrastructure demand rise. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
13. Mechanism: this thesis matters because the CEAP converts climate policy into targets, asset obligations, staging sequences, cost exposure and development-control implications. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
14. Council targets net zero by 2030 for non-landfill emissions and net zero by 2035 for all Council emissions including landfill. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
15. Mechanism: this thesis matters because the CEAP converts climate policy into targets, asset obligations, staging sequences, cost exposure and development-control implications. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
16. The community target is net zero by 2043, with interim reductions of 40% by 2030 and 70% by 2037 against the 2020-21 baseline. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
17. Mechanism: this thesis matters because the CEAP converts climate policy into targets, asset obligations, staging sequences, cost exposure and development-control implications. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
18. The community target requires an average 5% CO2-e reduction each year to 2043. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
19. Mechanism: this thesis matters because the CEAP converts climate policy into targets, asset obligations, staging sequences, cost exposure and development-control implications. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
20. Council corporate emissions were 22,150 tCO2-e in 2020-21, equal to 3.9% of community emissions. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
21. Mechanism: this thesis matters because the CEAP converts climate policy into targets, asset obligations, staging sequences, cost exposure and development-control implications. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
22. Community emissions were about 572,000 tCO2-e in 2020-21. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
23. Mechanism: this thesis matters because the CEAP converts climate policy into targets, asset obligations, staging sequences, cost exposure and development-control implications. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
24. Corporate emissions are dominated by landfill at 75%; community emissions are led by electricity, transport and agriculture. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
25. Mechanism: this thesis matters because the CEAP converts climate policy into targets, asset obligations, staging sequences, cost exposure and development-control implications. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
26. The modelled pathway is staged through renewable electricity, efficiency, solar, light-fleet electrification, FOGO, sustainable infrastructure and residual offsets or insets. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
27. Mechanism: this thesis matters because the CEAP converts climate policy into targets, asset obligations, staging sequences, cost exposure and development-control implications. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
28. The 2050 risk register identifies extreme risks for heat-related life and health, bushfire life loss, and riverine-flooding life loss. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
29. Mechanism: this thesis matters because the CEAP converts climate policy into targets, asset obligations, staging sequences, cost exposure and development-control implications. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
30. Beveridge Central shows CEAP implementation at project scale through shade, canopy, WSUD, rainwater harvesting, active paths, stormwater wetland, ESD buildings and heat-island controls. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
31. Mechanism: this thesis matters because the CEAP converts climate policy into targets, asset obligations, staging sequences, cost exposure and development-control implications. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
32. Development feasibility depends on carbon budgets, operating energy, road access, flood modelling, tree retention, construction cost escalation, basalt excavation risk, stormwater reuse and heat-resilient public realm. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
33. Mechanism: this thesis matters because the CEAP converts climate policy into targets, asset obligations, staging sequences, cost exposure and development-control implications. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

Quantified Baseline

34. Mitchell Shire Council acknowledged a climate emergency in September 2021. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
35. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
36. The CEAP provides direction over the next decade to reduce emissions and build resilience. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
37. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
38. Climate change was identified during 2021 Mitchell 2050 Community Vision consultation and became one of six key themes. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
39. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
40. The CEAP review point is 2026. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
41. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
42. The six goals cover heat, emergency preparedness, natural environment and agriculture, community emissions reduction, sustainable transport, and community empowerment. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
43. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
44. The plan includes 18 corporate actions. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
45. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
46. The plan includes 53 actions supporting the community. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
47. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
48. The non-landfill corporate target year is 2030. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
49. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
50. The all-emissions corporate target year is 2035. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
51. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
52. The interim corporate target is a 50% non-landfill reduction by 2025 compared with 2020-21. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
53. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
54. The community net-zero target year is 2043. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
55. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
56. The community interim target is a 40% reduction by 2030 compared with 2020-21. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
57. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
58. The community interim target is a 70% reduction by 2037 compared with 2020-21. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
59. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
60. The science-derived target is aligned with keeping warming as close as possible to 1.5 degrees Celsius. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
61. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
62. The global 1.5 degree Celsius carbon budget is stated as 380 Bt. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
63. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
64. Victoria share of that budget is stated as 2.2 Bt. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
65. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
66. Mitchell Shire share of that budget is stated as 8.3 Mt. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
67. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
68. Council corporate emissions were 22,150 tCO2-e in 2020-21. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
69. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
70. Council corporate emissions were 3.9% of community emissions in 2020-21. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
71. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
72. Landfill was 75% of Council corporate emissions. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
73. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
74. Road construction and transport fuel were each 4% of Council corporate emissions. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
75. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
76. Council entered renewable-electricity contracts in July 2022 for buildings, facilities and street lighting. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
77. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
78. Council electricity emissions are now close to zero through renewable electricity. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
79. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
80. Buildings electricity was 30% and street-lighting electricity was 24% of non-landfill operational emissions before the renewable-electricity shift. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
81. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
82. Transport fuel was 14% and gas was 12% of non-landfill operational emissions. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
83. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
84. Community emissions were about 572,000 tCO2-e in 2020-21. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
85. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
86. Community transport accounted for 25% of emissions. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
87. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
88. Community agriculture accounted for 15% of emissions. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
89. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
90. Community landfill accounted for 3% of emissions. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
91. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
92. Puckapunyal Australian Army training facility and base were excluded from the community inventory. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
93. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
94. Mitchell Landfill approved airspace is expected to be filled by the end of the decade. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
95. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
96. FOGO kerbside collection was expected from 2025. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
97. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
98. FOGO is expected to significantly reduce new landfill emissions. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
99. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
100. Municipal waste is likely to be diverted outside the Shire after Mitchell Landfill fills. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
101. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
102. Legacy emissions from closed landfill sites remain in Council boundary beyond 2030. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
103. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
104. Council expects limited options to reduce legacy landfill emissions beyond natural decomposition. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
105. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
106. Modelled actions can reduce Council annual organisational emissions by 33% by 2030. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
107. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
108. Remaining 2030 corporate emissions are expected from landfill, heavy vehicles, road construction and water use. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
109. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
110. Energy efficiency remains viable after renewable electricity because it reduces costs and frees funds for further action. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
111. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
112. Council expects to need carbon credits for residual emissions while still focusing on absolute emissions reduction. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
113. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
114. By 2027, key emergency management plans are intended to account for projected climate impacts. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
115. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
116. By 2030, climate risk and vulnerability assessments are intended for at least 80% of Council-owned or managed critical infrastructure. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
117. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
118. By 2025, Council intended to establish a Land Management Officer role. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
119. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
120. By 2025, Council intended to adopt a biodiversity strategy identifying biolinks. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
121. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
122. By 2027, Council intended to educate the community on electrifying residential gas systems and appliances. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
123. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
124. By 2030, Council intended to support a Renewable Energy Buying Group for commercial and industrial businesses. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
125. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
126. By 2027, Council intended fast EV chargers to be available in every town. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
127. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
128. By 2030, Council intended to expand cycling infrastructure and develop a municipal-wide Integrated Transport Strategy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
129. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
130. By 2025, Council intended a climate-change outreach program and more resident and youth engagement. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
131. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
132. By 2027, a community reuse and repair cafe and tool library was intended with Council support. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
133. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
134. Seymour Resource Recovery Centre opened in May 2023. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
135. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
136. Seymour Resource Recovery Centre has a 50 kW solar system. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
137. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
138. Seymour Resource Recovery Centre is described as energy positive. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
139. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
140. Seymour Resource Recovery Centre includes rainwater harvesting for site water needs. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
141. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
142. Seymour Resource Recovery Centre uses recycled materials including mixed plastics, foam offcuts and reclaimed wood. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
143. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
144. Council aims to divert 80% of waste from landfill by 2030. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
145. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
146. Broadford Living and Learning Centre received 12 kW of solar PV panels in 2023. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
147. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
148. Council installed public EV fast chargers in Broadford, Kilmore and Wallan. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
149. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
150. The Broadford charger is 24 kW DC at 113 High Street. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
151. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
152. The Kilmore charger is 24 kW DC at 12 Sydney Street. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
153. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
154. The Wallan charger is 50 kW DC at 65 High Street. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
155. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
156. Broadford and Kilmore chargers averaged more than 70 charging sessions monthly over nine months. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
157. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
158. Broadford and Kilmore chargers collectively prevented 3.17 tCO2-e over nine months. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
159. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
160. Council endorsed a five-year cycling infrastructure action plan in December 2022. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
161. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
162. Council works with the Goulburn Murray Climate Alliance on trusted installers for solar, batteries, heat pumps and other electrification appliances. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
163. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
164. Mitchell Shire libraries lend a thermal-imaging camera and Home Energy and Water Efficiency Toolkits. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
165. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
166. The risk assessment identified 16 very high risks. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
167. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
168. Bushfires, drought and flooding are key climate risks. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
169. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
170. Extreme heat affects health, power reliability, economic activity, essential services, agriculture and native species. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
171. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
172. Emergency management covers preparation, response, recovery, evacuation, shelters, public information and coordination. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
173. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
174. Agriculture resilience depends on temperature, rainfall, livestock health, food production, soil health, regenerative farming and methane reduction. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
175. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
176. Natural environment resilience depends on carbon sinks, biodiversity, water regulation, erosion prevention and heat reduction. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
177. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
178. Community emissions reduction depends on solar, electrification, renewable electricity, low-carbon construction, local purchasing and key-emitter engagement. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
179. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
180. Sustainable transport depends on public transport, active transport, electric vehicles, carshare and local-service access. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
181. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
182. Circular economy reduces landfill emissions and embodied energy by repair, reuse and waste avoidance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
183. Mechanism: this baseline fact changes the feasibility test by creating a measurable target, risk exposure, asset obligation, infrastructure dependency or implementation milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)

Corporate Emissions Actions

184. CO1 action is ESD for Council Buildings Policy 2021. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
185. CO1 starts in 2021-22. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
186. CO1 has stated impact 125-135 tCO2-e. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
187. CO1 has indicative cost 0 and estimated savings 3.4m. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
188. Mechanism: CO1 reduces Council emissions through demand reduction, fuel switching, renewable energy, waste diversion, procurement or governance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
189. Dependency: CO1 needs budget, procurement, technical standards, site readiness, policy adoption or asset renewal timing. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
190. Staging implication: CO1 sits on the pathway to 2030 non-landfill net zero or 2035 all-emissions net zero depending on whether it affects residual landfill or operational sources. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
191. Development feasibility: CO1 shows capital projects need lifecycle carbon, operating-cost and delivery-readiness tests. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
192. CO2 action is Sustainability technical specifications for minor works and plant. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
193. CO2 starts in 2023-24. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
194. CO2 has stated impact 55-65 tCO2-e. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
195. CO2 has indicative cost 110,000 and estimated savings 115,000. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
196. Mechanism: CO2 reduces Council emissions through demand reduction, fuel switching, renewable energy, waste diversion, procurement or governance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
197. Dependency: CO2 needs budget, procurement, technical standards, site readiness, policy adoption or asset renewal timing. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
198. Staging implication: CO2 sits on the pathway to 2030 non-landfill net zero or 2035 all-emissions net zero depending on whether it affects residual landfill or operational sources. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
199. Development feasibility: CO2 shows capital projects need lifecycle carbon, operating-cost and delivery-readiness tests. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
200. CO3 action is Energy-efficiency audits at 7 large Council sites. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
201. CO3 starts in 2023-24. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
202. CO3 has stated impact 70-80 tCO2-e. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
203. CO3 has indicative cost 240,000 and estimated savings 260,000. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
204. Mechanism: CO3 reduces Council emissions through demand reduction, fuel switching, renewable energy, waste diversion, procurement or governance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
205. Dependency: CO3 needs budget, procurement, technical standards, site readiness, policy adoption or asset renewal timing. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
206. Staging implication: CO3 sits on the pathway to 2030 non-landfill net zero or 2035 all-emissions net zero depending on whether it affects residual landfill or operational sources. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
207. Development feasibility: CO3 shows capital projects need lifecycle carbon, operating-cost and delivery-readiness tests. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
208. CO4 action is Energy-efficiency audits at 11 small Council sites. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
209. CO4 starts in 2024-25. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
210. CO4 has stated impact 15-25 tCO2-e. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
211. CO4 has indicative cost 75,000 and estimated savings 190,000. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
212. Mechanism: CO4 reduces Council emissions through demand reduction, fuel switching, renewable energy, waste diversion, procurement or governance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
213. Dependency: CO4 needs budget, procurement, technical standards, site readiness, policy adoption or asset renewal timing. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
214. Staging implication: CO4 sits on the pathway to 2030 non-landfill net zero or 2035 all-emissions net zero depending on whether it affects residual landfill or operational sources. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
215. Development feasibility: CO4 shows capital projects need lifecycle carbon, operating-cost and delivery-readiness tests. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
216. CO5 action is Additional 290 kW rooftop solar PV on Council assets. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
217. CO5 starts in 2024-25. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
218. CO5 has stated impact 280-320 tCO2-e. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
219. CO5 has indicative cost 550,000 and estimated savings 1.9m. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
220. Mechanism: CO5 reduces Council emissions through demand reduction, fuel switching, renewable energy, waste diversion, procurement or governance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
221. Dependency: CO5 needs budget, procurement, technical standards, site readiness, policy adoption or asset renewal timing. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
222. Staging implication: CO5 sits on the pathway to 2030 non-landfill net zero or 2035 all-emissions net zero depending on whether it affects residual landfill or operational sources. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
223. Development feasibility: CO5 shows capital projects need lifecycle carbon, operating-cost and delivery-readiness tests. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
224. CO6 action is Replace all park and sports lights with LED. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
225. CO6 starts in 2024-25. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
226. CO6 has stated impact 140-160 tCO2-e. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
227. CO6 has indicative cost 1.0m and estimated savings 1.5m. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
228. Mechanism: CO6 reduces Council emissions through demand reduction, fuel switching, renewable energy, waste diversion, procurement or governance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
229. Dependency: CO6 needs budget, procurement, technical standards, site readiness, policy adoption or asset renewal timing. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
230. Staging implication: CO6 sits on the pathway to 2030 non-landfill net zero or 2035 all-emissions net zero depending on whether it affects residual landfill or operational sources. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
231. Development feasibility: CO6 shows capital projects need lifecycle carbon, operating-cost and delivery-readiness tests. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
232. CO7 action is Street Lighting Bulk Change to LEDs. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
233. CO7 starts in 2025-26. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
234. CO7 has stated impact 760-800 tCO2-e. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
235. CO7 has indicative cost 1.5m and estimated savings 6.1m. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
236. Mechanism: CO7 reduces Council emissions through demand reduction, fuel switching, renewable energy, waste diversion, procurement or governance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
237. Dependency: CO7 needs budget, procurement, technical standards, site readiness, policy adoption or asset renewal timing. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
238. Staging implication: CO7 sits on the pathway to 2030 non-landfill net zero or 2035 all-emissions net zero depending on whether it affects residual landfill or operational sources. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
239. Development feasibility: CO7 shows capital projects need lifecycle carbon, operating-cost and delivery-readiness tests. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
240. CO8 action is Smart lighting on major roads. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
241. CO8 starts in 2026-27. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
242. CO8 has stated impact 140-50 tCO2-e. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
243. CO8 has indicative cost 220,000 and estimated savings 580,000. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
244. Mechanism: CO8 reduces Council emissions through demand reduction, fuel switching, renewable energy, waste diversion, procurement or governance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
245. Dependency: CO8 needs budget, procurement, technical standards, site readiness, policy adoption or asset renewal timing. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
246. Staging implication: CO8 sits on the pathway to 2030 non-landfill net zero or 2035 all-emissions net zero depending on whether it affects residual landfill or operational sources. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
247. Development feasibility: CO8 shows capital projects need lifecycle carbon, operating-cost and delivery-readiness tests. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
248. CO9 action is Sustainable Fleet Policy and Fleet Transition Plan. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
249. CO9 starts in 2023-24. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
250. CO9 has stated impact 25-35 tCO2-e. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
251. CO9 has indicative cost 75,000 and estimated savings 200,000. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
252. Mechanism: CO9 reduces Council emissions through demand reduction, fuel switching, renewable energy, waste diversion, procurement or governance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
253. Dependency: CO9 needs budget, procurement, technical standards, site readiness, policy adoption or asset renewal timing. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
254. Staging implication: CO9 sits on the pathway to 2030 non-landfill net zero or 2035 all-emissions net zero depending on whether it affects residual landfill or operational sources. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
255. Development feasibility: CO9 shows capital projects need lifecycle carbon, operating-cost and delivery-readiness tests. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
256. CO10 action is Transition all passenger fleet vehicles to EVs. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
257. CO10 starts in 2023-24. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
258. CO10 has stated impact 180-200 tCO2-e. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
259. CO10 has indicative cost 400,000 and estimated savings 420,000. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
260. Mechanism: CO10 reduces Council emissions through demand reduction, fuel switching, renewable energy, waste diversion, procurement or governance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
261. Dependency: CO10 needs budget, procurement, technical standards, site readiness, policy adoption or asset renewal timing. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
262. Staging implication: CO10 sits on the pathway to 2030 non-landfill net zero or 2035 all-emissions net zero depending on whether it affects residual landfill or operational sources. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
263. Development feasibility: CO10 shows capital projects need lifecycle carbon, operating-cost and delivery-readiness tests. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
264. CO11 action is Charging stations at Council sites for passenger and utility EVs. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
265. CO11 starts in 2023-24. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
266. CO11 has stated impact N/A. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
267. CO11 has indicative cost 365,000 and estimated savings 0. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
268. Mechanism: CO11 reduces Council emissions through demand reduction, fuel switching, renewable energy, waste diversion, procurement or governance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
269. Dependency: CO11 needs budget, procurement, technical standards, site readiness, policy adoption or asset renewal timing. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
270. Staging implication: CO11 sits on the pathway to 2030 non-landfill net zero or 2035 all-emissions net zero depending on whether it affects residual landfill or operational sources. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
271. Development feasibility: CO11 shows capital projects need lifecycle carbon, operating-cost and delivery-readiness tests. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
272. CO12 action is Sustainable Infrastructure Policy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
273. CO12 starts in 2026-27. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
274. CO12 has stated impact 230-250 tCO2-e. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
275. CO12 has indicative cost cost neutral and estimated savings cost neutral. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
276. Mechanism: CO12 reduces Council emissions through demand reduction, fuel switching, renewable energy, waste diversion, procurement or governance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
277. Dependency: CO12 needs budget, procurement, technical standards, site readiness, policy adoption or asset renewal timing. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
278. Staging implication: CO12 sits on the pathway to 2030 non-landfill net zero or 2035 all-emissions net zero depending on whether it affects residual landfill or operational sources. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
279. Development feasibility: CO12 shows capital projects need lifecycle carbon, operating-cost and delivery-readiness tests. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
280. CO13 action is Transition fleet vans and utility vehicles to EVs. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
281. CO13 starts in 2024-25 vans and 2027-28 utes. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
282. CO13 has stated impact 360-400 tCO2-e. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
283. CO13 has indicative cost 35,000 and estimated savings 640,000. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
284. Mechanism: CO13 reduces Council emissions through demand reduction, fuel switching, renewable energy, waste diversion, procurement or governance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
285. Dependency: CO13 needs budget, procurement, technical standards, site readiness, policy adoption or asset renewal timing. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
286. Staging implication: CO13 sits on the pathway to 2030 non-landfill net zero or 2035 all-emissions net zero depending on whether it affects residual landfill or operational sources. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
287. Development feasibility: CO13 shows capital projects need lifecycle carbon, operating-cost and delivery-readiness tests. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
288. CO14 action is Food Organics Garden Organics kerbside collection. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
289. CO14 starts in 2024-25. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
290. CO14 has stated impact 21,200 tCO2-e high-level estimate. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
291. CO14 has indicative cost not stated and estimated savings not stated. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
292. Mechanism: CO14 reduces Council emissions through demand reduction, fuel switching, renewable energy, waste diversion, procurement or governance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
293. Dependency: CO14 needs budget, procurement, technical standards, site readiness, policy adoption or asset renewal timing. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
294. Staging implication: CO14 sits on the pathway to 2030 non-landfill net zero or 2035 all-emissions net zero depending on whether it affects residual landfill or operational sources. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
295. Development feasibility: CO14 shows capital projects need lifecycle carbon, operating-cost and delivery-readiness tests. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
296. CO15 action is Sustainable Procurement Policy for products and service providers. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
297. CO15 starts in 2024-25. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
298. CO15 has stated impact not modelled. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
299. CO15 has indicative cost not stated and estimated savings not stated. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
300. Mechanism: CO15 reduces Council emissions through demand reduction, fuel switching, renewable energy, waste diversion, procurement or governance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
301. Dependency: CO15 needs budget, procurement, technical standards, site readiness, policy adoption or asset renewal timing. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
302. Staging implication: CO15 sits on the pathway to 2030 non-landfill net zero or 2035 all-emissions net zero depending on whether it affects residual landfill or operational sources. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
303. Development feasibility: CO15 shows capital projects need lifecycle carbon, operating-cost and delivery-readiness tests. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
304. CO16 action is Invest Council funds only in institutions not lending to fossil-fuel industries. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
305. CO16 starts in 2024-25. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
306. CO16 has stated impact not modelled. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
307. CO16 has indicative cost not stated and estimated savings not stated. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
308. Mechanism: CO16 reduces Council emissions through demand reduction, fuel switching, renewable energy, waste diversion, procurement or governance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
309. Dependency: CO16 needs budget, procurement, technical standards, site readiness, policy adoption or asset renewal timing. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
310. Staging implication: CO16 sits on the pathway to 2030 non-landfill net zero or 2035 all-emissions net zero depending on whether it affects residual landfill or operational sources. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
311. Development feasibility: CO16 shows capital projects need lifecycle carbon, operating-cost and delivery-readiness tests. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
312. CO17 action is Embed climate-emergency response into future decision making. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
313. CO17 starts in 2023-24. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
314. CO17 has stated impact not modelled. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
315. CO17 has indicative cost not stated and estimated savings not stated. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
316. Mechanism: CO17 reduces Council emissions through demand reduction, fuel switching, renewable energy, waste diversion, procurement or governance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
317. Dependency: CO17 needs budget, procurement, technical standards, site readiness, policy adoption or asset renewal timing. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
318. Staging implication: CO17 sits on the pathway to 2030 non-landfill net zero or 2035 all-emissions net zero depending on whether it affects residual landfill or operational sources. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
319. Development feasibility: CO17 shows capital projects need lifecycle carbon, operating-cost and delivery-readiness tests. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
320. CO18 action is Review and update strategies, policies and plans with climate-emergency commitments. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
321. CO18 starts in 2023-24. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
322. CO18 has stated impact not modelled. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
323. CO18 has indicative cost not stated and estimated savings not stated. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
324. Mechanism: CO18 reduces Council emissions through demand reduction, fuel switching, renewable energy, waste diversion, procurement or governance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
325. Dependency: CO18 needs budget, procurement, technical standards, site readiness, policy adoption or asset renewal timing. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
326. Staging implication: CO18 sits on the pathway to 2030 non-landfill net zero or 2035 all-emissions net zero depending on whether it affects residual landfill or operational sources. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
327. Development feasibility: CO18 shows capital projects need lifecycle carbon, operating-cost and delivery-readiness tests. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)

Community and Adaptation Actions

328. H1 under Heat: Increase township tree canopy on public land and diversify climate-adapted species. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
329. H1 assigns Council role as Directly responsible. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
330. H1 has Medium timeframe, High impact or reach, and cost category $$$. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
331. Mechanism: H1 changes exposure, behaviour, infrastructure availability, land management, emergency readiness, business procurement or advocacy settings. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
332. Dependency: H1 needs the relevant channel: Council works, planning amendment, community uptake, State support, water authority coordination, emergency-service coordination or private investment. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
333. Staging: H1 should be checked against the CEAP 2025, 2027 and 2030 milestones. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
334. Development feasibility: H1 affects whether new development can meet resilience expectations without later retrofit, especially for shade, water, transport, ESD, flood data or canopy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
335. Contested issue: H1 may create tension between upfront cost, land take, private autonomy, transport convenience, biodiversity retention, infrastructure standards and climate performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
336. Evidence gap: H1 needs implementation status, budget line, responsible unit and post-2024 progress data. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
337. H2 under Heat: Improve shading, seating, shelter and drinking water in pedestrian areas and active-transport routes. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
338. H2 assigns Council role as Directly responsible. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
339. H2 has Short timeframe, High impact or reach, and cost category $$. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
340. Mechanism: H2 changes exposure, behaviour, infrastructure availability, land management, emergency readiness, business procurement or advocacy settings. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
341. Dependency: H2 needs the relevant channel: Council works, planning amendment, community uptake, State support, water authority coordination, emergency-service coordination or private investment. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
342. Staging: H2 should be checked against the CEAP 2025, 2027 and 2030 milestones. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
343. Development feasibility: H2 affects whether new development can meet resilience expectations without later retrofit, especially for shade, water, transport, ESD, flood data or canopy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
344. Contested issue: H2 may create tension between upfront cost, land take, private autonomy, transport convenience, biodiversity retention, infrastructure standards and climate performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
345. Evidence gap: H2 needs implementation status, budget line, responsible unit and post-2024 progress data. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
346. H3 under Heat: Improve canopy cover and shading of active-transport routes. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
347. H3 assigns Council role as Directly responsible. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
348. H3 has Medium timeframe, High impact or reach, and cost category $$. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
349. Mechanism: H3 changes exposure, behaviour, infrastructure availability, land management, emergency readiness, business procurement or advocacy settings. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
350. Dependency: H3 needs the relevant channel: Council works, planning amendment, community uptake, State support, water authority coordination, emergency-service coordination or private investment. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
351. Staging: H3 should be checked against the CEAP 2025, 2027 and 2030 milestones. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
352. Development feasibility: H3 affects whether new development can meet resilience expectations without later retrofit, especially for shade, water, transport, ESD, flood data or canopy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
353. Contested issue: H3 may create tension between upfront cost, land take, private autonomy, transport convenience, biodiversity retention, infrastructure standards and climate performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
354. Evidence gap: H3 needs implementation status, budget line, responsible unit and post-2024 progress data. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
355. H4 under Heat: Encourage private-property tree planting through education, seedlings and partnerships. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
356. H4 assigns Council role as Influence. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
357. H4 has Short timeframe, High impact or reach, and cost category $$. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
358. Mechanism: H4 changes exposure, behaviour, infrastructure availability, land management, emergency readiness, business procurement or advocacy settings. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
359. Dependency: H4 needs the relevant channel: Council works, planning amendment, community uptake, State support, water authority coordination, emergency-service coordination or private investment. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
360. Staging: H4 should be checked against the CEAP 2025, 2027 and 2030 milestones. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
361. Development feasibility: H4 affects whether new development can meet resilience expectations without later retrofit, especially for shade, water, transport, ESD, flood data or canopy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
362. Contested issue: H4 may create tension between upfront cost, land take, private autonomy, transport convenience, biodiversity retention, infrastructure standards and climate performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
363. Evidence gap: H4 needs implementation status, budget line, responsible unit and post-2024 progress data. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
364. H5 under Heat: Strengthen planning scheme requirements for heat-island reduction, dark-roof controls, green and blue space and vegetation protection. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
365. H5 assigns Council role as Advocacy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
366. H5 has Short timeframe, High impact or reach, and cost category $$. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
367. Mechanism: H5 changes exposure, behaviour, infrastructure availability, land management, emergency readiness, business procurement or advocacy settings. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
368. Dependency: H5 needs the relevant channel: Council works, planning amendment, community uptake, State support, water authority coordination, emergency-service coordination or private investment. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
369. Staging: H5 should be checked against the CEAP 2025, 2027 and 2030 milestones. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
370. Development feasibility: H5 affects whether new development can meet resilience expectations without later retrofit, especially for shade, water, transport, ESD, flood data or canopy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
371. Contested issue: H5 may create tension between upfront cost, land take, private autonomy, transport convenience, biodiversity retention, infrastructure standards and climate performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
372. Evidence gap: H5 needs implementation status, budget line, responsible unit and post-2024 progress data. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
373. H6 under Heat: Help service providers use the Vulnerable Persons Register for extreme heat. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
374. H6 assigns Council role as Influence. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
375. H6 has Short timeframe, Low impact or reach, and cost category $. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
376. Mechanism: H6 changes exposure, behaviour, infrastructure availability, land management, emergency readiness, business procurement or advocacy settings. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
377. Dependency: H6 needs the relevant channel: Council works, planning amendment, community uptake, State support, water authority coordination, emergency-service coordination or private investment. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
378. Staging: H6 should be checked against the CEAP 2025, 2027 and 2030 milestones. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
379. Development feasibility: H6 affects whether new development can meet resilience expectations without later retrofit, especially for shade, water, transport, ESD, flood data or canopy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
380. Contested issue: H6 may create tension between upfront cost, land take, private autonomy, transport convenience, biodiversity retention, infrastructure standards and climate performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
381. Evidence gap: H6 needs implementation status, budget line, responsible unit and post-2024 progress data. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
382. H7 under Heat: Assess extreme-temperature respite facilities for accessibility and capacity. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
383. H7 assigns Council role as Directly responsible. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
384. H7 has Short timeframe, Medium impact or reach, and cost category $. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
385. Mechanism: H7 changes exposure, behaviour, infrastructure availability, land management, emergency readiness, business procurement or advocacy settings. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
386. Dependency: H7 needs the relevant channel: Council works, planning amendment, community uptake, State support, water authority coordination, emergency-service coordination or private investment. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
387. Staging: H7 should be checked against the CEAP 2025, 2027 and 2030 milestones. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
388. Development feasibility: H7 affects whether new development can meet resilience expectations without later retrofit, especially for shade, water, transport, ESD, flood data or canopy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
389. Contested issue: H7 may create tension between upfront cost, land take, private autonomy, transport convenience, biodiversity retention, infrastructure standards and climate performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
390. Evidence gap: H7 needs implementation status, budget line, responsible unit and post-2024 progress data. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
391. H8 under Heat: Develop requirements and policy for zero-emissions and climate-resilient construction. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
392. H8 assigns Council role as Advocacy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
393. H8 has Short timeframe, Medium impact or reach, and cost category $. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
394. Mechanism: H8 changes exposure, behaviour, infrastructure availability, land management, emergency readiness, business procurement or advocacy settings. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
395. Dependency: H8 needs the relevant channel: Council works, planning amendment, community uptake, State support, water authority coordination, emergency-service coordination or private investment. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
396. Staging: H8 should be checked against the CEAP 2025, 2027 and 2030 milestones. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
397. Development feasibility: H8 affects whether new development can meet resilience expectations without later retrofit, especially for shade, water, transport, ESD, flood data or canopy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
398. Contested issue: H8 may create tension between upfront cost, land take, private autonomy, transport convenience, biodiversity retention, infrastructure standards and climate performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
399. Evidence gap: H8 needs implementation status, budget line, responsible unit and post-2024 progress data. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
400. E1 under Emergency: Revise emergency plans and subplans for changing bushfire risk and behaviour. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
401. E1 assigns Council role as Influence. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
402. E1 has Short timeframe, High impact or reach, and cost category $. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
403. Mechanism: E1 changes exposure, behaviour, infrastructure availability, land management, emergency readiness, business procurement or advocacy settings. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
404. Dependency: E1 needs the relevant channel: Council works, planning amendment, community uptake, State support, water authority coordination, emergency-service coordination or private investment. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
405. Staging: E1 should be checked against the CEAP 2025, 2027 and 2030 milestones. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
406. Development feasibility: E1 affects whether new development can meet resilience expectations without later retrofit, especially for shade, water, transport, ESD, flood data or canopy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
407. Contested issue: E1 may create tension between upfront cost, land take, private autonomy, transport convenience, biodiversity retention, infrastructure standards and climate performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
408. Evidence gap: E1 needs implementation status, budget line, responsible unit and post-2024 progress data. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
409. E2 under Emergency: Support emergency-preparedness education for bushfire, flood, storms and new climate risks. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
410. E2 assigns Council role as Influence. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
411. E2 has Short timeframe, High impact or reach, and cost category $. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
412. Mechanism: E2 changes exposure, behaviour, infrastructure availability, land management, emergency readiness, business procurement or advocacy settings. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
413. Dependency: E2 needs the relevant channel: Council works, planning amendment, community uptake, State support, water authority coordination, emergency-service coordination or private investment. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
414. Staging: E2 should be checked against the CEAP 2025, 2027 and 2030 milestones. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
415. Development feasibility: E2 affects whether new development can meet resilience expectations without later retrofit, especially for shade, water, transport, ESD, flood data or canopy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
416. Contested issue: E2 may create tension between upfront cost, land take, private autonomy, transport convenience, biodiversity retention, infrastructure standards and climate performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
417. Evidence gap: E2 needs implementation status, budget line, responsible unit and post-2024 progress data. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
418. E3 under Emergency: Assess Emergency Relief Centres for access, resilience and capacity. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
419. E3 assigns Council role as Directly responsible. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
420. E3 has Short timeframe, Medium impact or reach, and cost category $$. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
421. Mechanism: E3 changes exposure, behaviour, infrastructure availability, land management, emergency readiness, business procurement or advocacy settings. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
422. Dependency: E3 needs the relevant channel: Council works, planning amendment, community uptake, State support, water authority coordination, emergency-service coordination or private investment. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
423. Staging: E3 should be checked against the CEAP 2025, 2027 and 2030 milestones. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
424. Development feasibility: E3 affects whether new development can meet resilience expectations without later retrofit, especially for shade, water, transport, ESD, flood data or canopy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
425. Contested issue: E3 may create tension between upfront cost, land take, private autonomy, transport convenience, biodiversity retention, infrastructure standards and climate performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
426. Evidence gap: E3 needs implementation status, budget line, responsible unit and post-2024 progress data. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
427. E4 under Emergency: Assess critical infrastructure climate risk and develop upgrade action plan. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
428. E4 assigns Council role as Directly responsible and advocacy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
429. E4 has Medium timeframe, High impact or reach, and cost category $$$. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
430. Mechanism: E4 changes exposure, behaviour, infrastructure availability, land management, emergency readiness, business procurement or advocacy settings. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
431. Dependency: E4 needs the relevant channel: Council works, planning amendment, community uptake, State support, water authority coordination, emergency-service coordination or private investment. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
432. Staging: E4 should be checked against the CEAP 2025, 2027 and 2030 milestones. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
433. Development feasibility: E4 affects whether new development can meet resilience expectations without later retrofit, especially for shade, water, transport, ESD, flood data or canopy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
434. Contested issue: E4 may create tension between upfront cost, land take, private autonomy, transport convenience, biodiversity retention, infrastructure standards and climate performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
435. Evidence gap: E4 needs implementation status, budget line, responsible unit and post-2024 progress data. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
436. E5 under Emergency: Develop integrated water management plans for stormwater, drainage, sustainable water use and reuse. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
437. E5 assigns Council role as Directly responsible and influence. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
438. E5 has Medium timeframe, Medium impact or reach, and cost category $$$. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
439. Mechanism: E5 changes exposure, behaviour, infrastructure availability, land management, emergency readiness, business procurement or advocacy settings. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
440. Dependency: E5 needs the relevant channel: Council works, planning amendment, community uptake, State support, water authority coordination, emergency-service coordination or private investment. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
441. Staging: E5 should be checked against the CEAP 2025, 2027 and 2030 milestones. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
442. Development feasibility: E5 affects whether new development can meet resilience expectations without later retrofit, especially for shade, water, transport, ESD, flood data or canopy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
443. Contested issue: E5 may create tension between upfront cost, land take, private autonomy, transport convenience, biodiversity retention, infrastructure standards and climate performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
444. Evidence gap: E5 needs implementation status, budget line, responsible unit and post-2024 progress data. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
445. E6 under Emergency: Advocate for early-warning systems for wildfires and rapid-onset floods. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
446. E6 assigns Council role as Advocacy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
447. E6 has Short timeframe, High impact or reach, and cost category $. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
448. Mechanism: E6 changes exposure, behaviour, infrastructure availability, land management, emergency readiness, business procurement or advocacy settings. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
449. Dependency: E6 needs the relevant channel: Council works, planning amendment, community uptake, State support, water authority coordination, emergency-service coordination or private investment. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
450. Staging: E6 should be checked against the CEAP 2025, 2027 and 2030 milestones. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
451. Development feasibility: E6 affects whether new development can meet resilience expectations without later retrofit, especially for shade, water, transport, ESD, flood data or canopy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
452. Contested issue: E6 may create tension between upfront cost, land take, private autonomy, transport convenience, biodiversity retention, infrastructure standards and climate performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
453. Evidence gap: E6 needs implementation status, budget line, responsible unit and post-2024 progress data. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
454. E7 under Emergency: Advocate for flood models with climate impacts and 1-in-100 year levels integrated into planning scheme. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
455. E7 assigns Council role as Advocacy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
456. E7 has Short timeframe, High impact or reach, and cost category $. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
457. Mechanism: E7 changes exposure, behaviour, infrastructure availability, land management, emergency readiness, business procurement or advocacy settings. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
458. Dependency: E7 needs the relevant channel: Council works, planning amendment, community uptake, State support, water authority coordination, emergency-service coordination or private investment. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
459. Staging: E7 should be checked against the CEAP 2025, 2027 and 2030 milestones. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
460. Development feasibility: E7 affects whether new development can meet resilience expectations without later retrofit, especially for shade, water, transport, ESD, flood data or canopy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
461. Contested issue: E7 may create tension between upfront cost, land take, private autonomy, transport convenience, biodiversity retention, infrastructure standards and climate performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
462. Evidence gap: E7 needs implementation status, budget line, responsible unit and post-2024 progress data. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
463. E8 under Emergency: Advocate for State flood mitigation protecting townships to 1-in-100 year levels. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
464. E8 assigns Council role as Advocacy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
465. E8 has Short timeframe, High impact or reach, and cost category $. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
466. Mechanism: E8 changes exposure, behaviour, infrastructure availability, land management, emergency readiness, business procurement or advocacy settings. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
467. Dependency: E8 needs the relevant channel: Council works, planning amendment, community uptake, State support, water authority coordination, emergency-service coordination or private investment. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
468. Staging: E8 should be checked against the CEAP 2025, 2027 and 2030 milestones. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
469. Development feasibility: E8 affects whether new development can meet resilience expectations without later retrofit, especially for shade, water, transport, ESD, flood data or canopy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
470. Contested issue: E8 may create tension between upfront cost, land take, private autonomy, transport convenience, biodiversity retention, infrastructure standards and climate performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
471. Evidence gap: E8 needs implementation status, budget line, responsible unit and post-2024 progress data. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
472. E9 under Emergency: Investigate planned, ecological and cultural burning for fire-risk reduction. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
473. E9 assigns Council role as Influence. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
474. E9 has Short timeframe, Medium impact or reach, and cost category $. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
475. Mechanism: E9 changes exposure, behaviour, infrastructure availability, land management, emergency readiness, business procurement or advocacy settings. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
476. Dependency: E9 needs the relevant channel: Council works, planning amendment, community uptake, State support, water authority coordination, emergency-service coordination or private investment. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
477. Staging: E9 should be checked against the CEAP 2025, 2027 and 2030 milestones. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
478. Development feasibility: E9 affects whether new development can meet resilience expectations without later retrofit, especially for shade, water, transport, ESD, flood data or canopy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
479. Contested issue: E9 may create tension between upfront cost, land take, private autonomy, transport convenience, biodiversity retention, infrastructure standards and climate performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
480. Evidence gap: E9 needs implementation status, budget line, responsible unit and post-2024 progress data. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
481. A1 under Environment and agriculture: Advocate for livestock feed alternatives that reduce methane including asparagopsis. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
482. A1 assigns Council role as Advocacy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
483. A1 has Medium timeframe, Low impact or reach, and cost category $. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
484. Mechanism: A1 changes exposure, behaviour, infrastructure availability, land management, emergency readiness, business procurement or advocacy settings. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
485. Dependency: A1 needs the relevant channel: Council works, planning amendment, community uptake, State support, water authority coordination, emergency-service coordination or private investment. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
486. Staging: A1 should be checked against the CEAP 2025, 2027 and 2030 milestones. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
487. Development feasibility: A1 affects whether new development can meet resilience expectations without later retrofit, especially for shade, water, transport, ESD, flood data or canopy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
488. Contested issue: A1 may create tension between upfront cost, land take, private autonomy, transport convenience, biodiversity retention, infrastructure standards and climate performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
489. Evidence gap: A1 needs implementation status, budget line, responsible unit and post-2024 progress data. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
490. A2 under Environment and agriculture: Support soil-carbon sequestration research and application. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
491. A2 assigns Council role as Influence. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
492. A2 has Medium timeframe, Low impact or reach, and cost category $$. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
493. Mechanism: A2 changes exposure, behaviour, infrastructure availability, land management, emergency readiness, business procurement or advocacy settings. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
494. Dependency: A2 needs the relevant channel: Council works, planning amendment, community uptake, State support, water authority coordination, emergency-service coordination or private investment. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
495. Staging: A2 should be checked against the CEAP 2025, 2027 and 2030 milestones. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
496. Development feasibility: A2 affects whether new development can meet resilience expectations without later retrofit, especially for shade, water, transport, ESD, flood data or canopy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
497. Contested issue: A2 may create tension between upfront cost, land take, private autonomy, transport convenience, biodiversity retention, infrastructure standards and climate performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
498. Evidence gap: A2 needs implementation status, budget line, responsible unit and post-2024 progress data. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
499. A3 under Environment and agriculture: Partner with groups to monitor roadsides and reserves for invasive species. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
500. A3 assigns Council role as Directly responsible. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
501. A3 has Long timeframe, Medium impact or reach, and cost category $. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
502. Mechanism: A3 changes exposure, behaviour, infrastructure availability, land management, emergency readiness, business procurement or advocacy settings. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
503. Dependency: A3 needs the relevant channel: Council works, planning amendment, community uptake, State support, water authority coordination, emergency-service coordination or private investment. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
504. Staging: A3 should be checked against the CEAP 2025, 2027 and 2030 milestones. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
505. Development feasibility: A3 affects whether new development can meet resilience expectations without later retrofit, especially for shade, water, transport, ESD, flood data or canopy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
506. Contested issue: A3 may create tension between upfront cost, land take, private autonomy, transport convenience, biodiversity retention, infrastructure standards and climate performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
507. Evidence gap: A3 needs implementation status, budget line, responsible unit and post-2024 progress data. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
508. A4 under Environment and agriculture: Develop a biodiversity strategy protecting and enhancing biolinks. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
509. A4 assigns Council role as Directly responsible. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
510. A4 has Short timeframe, Medium impact or reach, and cost category $$. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
511. Mechanism: A4 changes exposure, behaviour, infrastructure availability, land management, emergency readiness, business procurement or advocacy settings. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
512. Dependency: A4 needs the relevant channel: Council works, planning amendment, community uptake, State support, water authority coordination, emergency-service coordination or private investment. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
513. Staging: A4 should be checked against the CEAP 2025, 2027 and 2030 milestones. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
514. Development feasibility: A4 affects whether new development can meet resilience expectations without later retrofit, especially for shade, water, transport, ESD, flood data or canopy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
515. Contested issue: A4 may create tension between upfront cost, land take, private autonomy, transport convenience, biodiversity retention, infrastructure standards and climate performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
516. Evidence gap: A4 needs implementation status, budget line, responsible unit and post-2024 progress data. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
517. A5 under Environment and agriculture: Protect forests, woodlands and grasslands and enable revegetation on public and private land. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
518. A5 assigns Council role as Directly responsible and advocacy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
519. A5 has Medium timeframe, Medium impact or reach, and cost category $$. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
520. Mechanism: A5 changes exposure, behaviour, infrastructure availability, land management, emergency readiness, business procurement or advocacy settings. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
521. Dependency: A5 needs the relevant channel: Council works, planning amendment, community uptake, State support, water authority coordination, emergency-service coordination or private investment. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
522. Staging: A5 should be checked against the CEAP 2025, 2027 and 2030 milestones. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
523. Development feasibility: A5 affects whether new development can meet resilience expectations without later retrofit, especially for shade, water, transport, ESD, flood data or canopy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
524. Contested issue: A5 may create tension between upfront cost, land take, private autonomy, transport convenience, biodiversity retention, infrastructure standards and climate performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
525. Evidence gap: A5 needs implementation status, budget line, responsible unit and post-2024 progress data. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
526. A6 under Environment and agriculture: Advocate for Agriculture Victoria regional support to farmers and landowners. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
527. A6 assigns Council role as Advocacy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
528. A6 has Short timeframe, High impact or reach, and cost category $. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
529. Mechanism: A6 changes exposure, behaviour, infrastructure availability, land management, emergency readiness, business procurement or advocacy settings. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
530. Dependency: A6 needs the relevant channel: Council works, planning amendment, community uptake, State support, water authority coordination, emergency-service coordination or private investment. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
531. Staging: A6 should be checked against the CEAP 2025, 2027 and 2030 milestones. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
532. Development feasibility: A6 affects whether new development can meet resilience expectations without later retrofit, especially for shade, water, transport, ESD, flood data or canopy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
533. Contested issue: A6 may create tension between upfront cost, land take, private autonomy, transport convenience, biodiversity retention, infrastructure standards and climate performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
534. Evidence gap: A6 needs implementation status, budget line, responsible unit and post-2024 progress data. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
535. A7 under Environment and agriculture: Introduce Land Management Officer for sustainable agriculture, biodiversity, property planning, AgTech and nutrient budgeting. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
536. A7 assigns Council role as Directly responsible. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
537. A7 has Short timeframe, Low impact or reach, and cost category $. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
538. Mechanism: A7 changes exposure, behaviour, infrastructure availability, land management, emergency readiness, business procurement or advocacy settings. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
539. Dependency: A7 needs the relevant channel: Council works, planning amendment, community uptake, State support, water authority coordination, emergency-service coordination or private investment. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
540. Staging: A7 should be checked against the CEAP 2025, 2027 and 2030 milestones. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
541. Development feasibility: A7 affects whether new development can meet resilience expectations without later retrofit, especially for shade, water, transport, ESD, flood data or canopy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
542. Contested issue: A7 may create tension between upfront cost, land take, private autonomy, transport convenience, biodiversity retention, infrastructure standards and climate performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
543. Evidence gap: A7 needs implementation status, budget line, responsible unit and post-2024 progress data. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
544. A8 under Environment and agriculture: Work with Traditional Owners on ecological and cultural knowledge and land-management projects. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
545. A8 assigns Council role as Influence. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
546. A8 has Short timeframe, Medium impact or reach, and cost category $. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
547. Mechanism: A8 changes exposure, behaviour, infrastructure availability, land management, emergency readiness, business procurement or advocacy settings. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
548. Dependency: A8 needs the relevant channel: Council works, planning amendment, community uptake, State support, water authority coordination, emergency-service coordination or private investment. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
549. Staging: A8 should be checked against the CEAP 2025, 2027 and 2030 milestones. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
550. Development feasibility: A8 affects whether new development can meet resilience expectations without later retrofit, especially for shade, water, transport, ESD, flood data or canopy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
551. Contested issue: A8 may create tension between upfront cost, land take, private autonomy, transport convenience, biodiversity retention, infrastructure standards and climate performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
552. Evidence gap: A8 needs implementation status, budget line, responsible unit and post-2024 progress data. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
553. A9 under Environment and agriculture: Protect existing canopy trees and biodiversity assets through Urban Forest Strategy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
554. A9 assigns Council role as Directly responsible, influence and advocacy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
555. A9 has Short timeframe, Medium impact or reach, and cost category $. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
556. Mechanism: A9 changes exposure, behaviour, infrastructure availability, land management, emergency readiness, business procurement or advocacy settings. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
557. Dependency: A9 needs the relevant channel: Council works, planning amendment, community uptake, State support, water authority coordination, emergency-service coordination or private investment. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
558. Staging: A9 should be checked against the CEAP 2025, 2027 and 2030 milestones. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
559. Development feasibility: A9 affects whether new development can meet resilience expectations without later retrofit, especially for shade, water, transport, ESD, flood data or canopy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
560. Contested issue: A9 may create tension between upfront cost, land take, private autonomy, transport convenience, biodiversity retention, infrastructure standards and climate performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
561. Evidence gap: A9 needs implementation status, budget line, responsible unit and post-2024 progress data. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
562. A10 under Environment and agriculture: Support indigenous, native and climate-resilient seed stock. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
563. A10 assigns Council role as Influence and advocacy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
564. A10 has Short timeframe, Medium impact or reach, and cost category $. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
565. Mechanism: A10 changes exposure, behaviour, infrastructure availability, land management, emergency readiness, business procurement or advocacy settings. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
566. Dependency: A10 needs the relevant channel: Council works, planning amendment, community uptake, State support, water authority coordination, emergency-service coordination or private investment. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
567. Staging: A10 should be checked against the CEAP 2025, 2027 and 2030 milestones. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
568. Development feasibility: A10 affects whether new development can meet resilience expectations without later retrofit, especially for shade, water, transport, ESD, flood data or canopy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
569. Contested issue: A10 may create tension between upfront cost, land take, private autonomy, transport convenience, biodiversity retention, infrastructure standards and climate performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
570. Evidence gap: A10 needs implementation status, budget line, responsible unit and post-2024 progress data. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
571. R1 under Community emissions: Investigate low-interest solar and battery loans repaid through rates. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
572. R1 assigns Council role as Influence. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
573. R1 has Long timeframe, High impact or reach, and cost category $. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
574. Mechanism: R1 changes exposure, behaviour, infrastructure availability, land management, emergency readiness, business procurement or advocacy settings. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
575. Dependency: R1 needs the relevant channel: Council works, planning amendment, community uptake, State support, water authority coordination, emergency-service coordination or private investment. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
576. Staging: R1 should be checked against the CEAP 2025, 2027 and 2030 milestones. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
577. Development feasibility: R1 affects whether new development can meet resilience expectations without later retrofit, especially for shade, water, transport, ESD, flood data or canopy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
578. Contested issue: R1 may create tension between upfront cost, land take, private autonomy, transport convenience, biodiversity retention, infrastructure standards and climate performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
579. Evidence gap: R1 needs implementation status, budget line, responsible unit and post-2024 progress data. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
580. R2 under Community emissions: Facilitate renewable-energy PPA buying groups for commercial and industrial businesses. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
581. R2 assigns Council role as Influence. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
582. R2 has Short timeframe, Low impact or reach, and cost category $. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
583. Mechanism: R2 changes exposure, behaviour, infrastructure availability, land management, emergency readiness, business procurement or advocacy settings. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
584. Dependency: R2 needs the relevant channel: Council works, planning amendment, community uptake, State support, water authority coordination, emergency-service coordination or private investment. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
585. Staging: R2 should be checked against the CEAP 2025, 2027 and 2030 milestones. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
586. Development feasibility: R2 affects whether new development can meet resilience expectations without later retrofit, especially for shade, water, transport, ESD, flood data or canopy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
587. Contested issue: R2 may create tension between upfront cost, land take, private autonomy, transport convenience, biodiversity retention, infrastructure standards and climate performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
588. Evidence gap: R2 needs implementation status, budget line, responsible unit and post-2024 progress data. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
589. R3 under Community emissions: Run buy-local campaigns and sustainability incentives for business. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
590. R3 assigns Council role as Influence. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
591. R3 has Short timeframe, Low impact or reach, and cost category $. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
592. Mechanism: R3 changes exposure, behaviour, infrastructure availability, land management, emergency readiness, business procurement or advocacy settings. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
593. Dependency: R3 needs the relevant channel: Council works, planning amendment, community uptake, State support, water authority coordination, emergency-service coordination or private investment. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
594. Staging: R3 should be checked against the CEAP 2025, 2027 and 2030 milestones. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
595. Development feasibility: R3 affects whether new development can meet resilience expectations without later retrofit, especially for shade, water, transport, ESD, flood data or canopy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
596. Contested issue: R3 may create tension between upfront cost, land take, private autonomy, transport convenience, biodiversity retention, infrastructure standards and climate performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
597. Evidence gap: R3 needs implementation status, budget line, responsible unit and post-2024 progress data. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
598. R4 under Community emissions: Advocate stronger ESD standards in planning scheme and National Construction Code. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
599. R4 assigns Council role as Advocacy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
600. R4 has Medium timeframe, Medium impact or reach, and cost category $. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
601. Mechanism: R4 changes exposure, behaviour, infrastructure availability, land management, emergency readiness, business procurement or advocacy settings. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
602. Dependency: R4 needs the relevant channel: Council works, planning amendment, community uptake, State support, water authority coordination, emergency-service coordination or private investment. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
603. Staging: R4 should be checked against the CEAP 2025, 2027 and 2030 milestones. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
604. Development feasibility: R4 affects whether new development can meet resilience expectations without later retrofit, especially for shade, water, transport, ESD, flood data or canopy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
605. Contested issue: R4 may create tension between upfront cost, land take, private autonomy, transport convenience, biodiversity retention, infrastructure standards and climate performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
606. Evidence gap: R4 needs implementation status, budget line, responsible unit and post-2024 progress data. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
607. R5 under Community emissions: Advocate landlord-tenant agreements for rental solar. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
608. R5 assigns Council role as Advocacy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
609. R5 has Short timeframe, Medium impact or reach, and cost category $. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
610. Mechanism: R5 changes exposure, behaviour, infrastructure availability, land management, emergency readiness, business procurement or advocacy settings. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
611. Dependency: R5 needs the relevant channel: Council works, planning amendment, community uptake, State support, water authority coordination, emergency-service coordination or private investment. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
612. Staging: R5 should be checked against the CEAP 2025, 2027 and 2030 milestones. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
613. Development feasibility: R5 affects whether new development can meet resilience expectations without later retrofit, especially for shade, water, transport, ESD, flood data or canopy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
614. Contested issue: R5 may create tension between upfront cost, land take, private autonomy, transport convenience, biodiversity retention, infrastructure standards and climate performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
615. Evidence gap: R5 needs implementation status, budget line, responsible unit and post-2024 progress data. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
616. R6 under Community emissions: Advocate solar and ESD upgrades on social and affordable housing. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
617. R6 assigns Council role as Advocacy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
618. R6 has Short timeframe, Medium impact or reach, and cost category $. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
619. Mechanism: R6 changes exposure, behaviour, infrastructure availability, land management, emergency readiness, business procurement or advocacy settings. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
620. Dependency: R6 needs the relevant channel: Council works, planning amendment, community uptake, State support, water authority coordination, emergency-service coordination or private investment. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
621. Staging: R6 should be checked against the CEAP 2025, 2027 and 2030 milestones. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
622. Development feasibility: R6 affects whether new development can meet resilience expectations without later retrofit, especially for shade, water, transport, ESD, flood data or canopy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
623. Contested issue: R6 may create tension between upfront cost, land take, private autonomy, transport convenience, biodiversity retention, infrastructure standards and climate performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
624. Evidence gap: R6 needs implementation status, budget line, responsible unit and post-2024 progress data. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
625. R7 under Community emissions: Educate households to eliminate gas in electricity-grid connected homes. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
626. R7 assigns Council role as Influence. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
627. R7 has Short timeframe, Medium impact or reach, and cost category $$. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
628. Mechanism: R7 changes exposure, behaviour, infrastructure availability, land management, emergency readiness, business procurement or advocacy settings. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
629. Dependency: R7 needs the relevant channel: Council works, planning amendment, community uptake, State support, water authority coordination, emergency-service coordination or private investment. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
630. Staging: R7 should be checked against the CEAP 2025, 2027 and 2030 milestones. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
631. Development feasibility: R7 affects whether new development can meet resilience expectations without later retrofit, especially for shade, water, transport, ESD, flood data or canopy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
632. Contested issue: R7 may create tension between upfront cost, land take, private autonomy, transport convenience, biodiversity retention, infrastructure standards and climate performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
633. Evidence gap: R7 needs implementation status, budget line, responsible unit and post-2024 progress data. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
634. R8 under Community emissions: Support subsidies for residential gas equipment replacement for low-income households. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
635. R8 assigns Council role as Influence. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
636. R8 has Short timeframe, High impact or reach, and cost category $$. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
637. Mechanism: R8 changes exposure, behaviour, infrastructure availability, land management, emergency readiness, business procurement or advocacy settings. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
638. Dependency: R8 needs the relevant channel: Council works, planning amendment, community uptake, State support, water authority coordination, emergency-service coordination or private investment. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
639. Staging: R8 should be checked against the CEAP 2025, 2027 and 2030 milestones. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
640. Development feasibility: R8 affects whether new development can meet resilience expectations without later retrofit, especially for shade, water, transport, ESD, flood data or canopy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
641. Contested issue: R8 may create tension between upfront cost, land take, private autonomy, transport convenience, biodiversity retention, infrastructure standards and climate performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
642. Evidence gap: R8 needs implementation status, budget line, responsible unit and post-2024 progress data. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
643. R9 under Community emissions: Engage key emitters including cement manufacturers on emissions sources and Portland cement alternatives. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
644. R9 assigns Council role as Influence. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
645. R9 has Medium timeframe, Low impact or reach, and cost category $$. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
646. Mechanism: R9 changes exposure, behaviour, infrastructure availability, land management, emergency readiness, business procurement or advocacy settings. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
647. Dependency: R9 needs the relevant channel: Council works, planning amendment, community uptake, State support, water authority coordination, emergency-service coordination or private investment. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
648. Staging: R9 should be checked against the CEAP 2025, 2027 and 2030 milestones. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
649. Development feasibility: R9 affects whether new development can meet resilience expectations without later retrofit, especially for shade, water, transport, ESD, flood data or canopy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
650. Contested issue: R9 may create tension between upfront cost, land take, private autonomy, transport convenience, biodiversity retention, infrastructure standards and climate performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
651. Evidence gap: R9 needs implementation status, budget line, responsible unit and post-2024 progress data. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
652. T1 under Transport: Advocate increased public transport within and between townships. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
653. T1 assigns Council role as Advocacy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
654. T1 has Short timeframe, Low impact or reach, and cost category $. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
655. Mechanism: T1 changes exposure, behaviour, infrastructure availability, land management, emergency readiness, business procurement or advocacy settings. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
656. Dependency: T1 needs the relevant channel: Council works, planning amendment, community uptake, State support, water authority coordination, emergency-service coordination or private investment. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
657. Staging: T1 should be checked against the CEAP 2025, 2027 and 2030 milestones. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
658. Development feasibility: T1 affects whether new development can meet resilience expectations without later retrofit, especially for shade, water, transport, ESD, flood data or canopy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
659. Contested issue: T1 may create tension between upfront cost, land take, private autonomy, transport convenience, biodiversity retention, infrastructure standards and climate performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
660. Evidence gap: T1 needs implementation status, budget line, responsible unit and post-2024 progress data. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
661. T2 under Transport: Educate residents on public transport benefits and availability. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
662. T2 assigns Council role as Influence. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
663. T2 has Short timeframe, Medium impact or reach, and cost category $. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
664. Mechanism: T2 changes exposure, behaviour, infrastructure availability, land management, emergency readiness, business procurement or advocacy settings. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
665. Dependency: T2 needs the relevant channel: Council works, planning amendment, community uptake, State support, water authority coordination, emergency-service coordination or private investment. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
666. Staging: T2 should be checked against the CEAP 2025, 2027 and 2030 milestones. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
667. Development feasibility: T2 affects whether new development can meet resilience expectations without later retrofit, especially for shade, water, transport, ESD, flood data or canopy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
668. Contested issue: T2 may create tension between upfront cost, land take, private autonomy, transport convenience, biodiversity retention, infrastructure standards and climate performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
669. Evidence gap: T2 needs implementation status, budget line, responsible unit and post-2024 progress data. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
670. T3 under Transport: Install cycling infrastructure, wider paths, shared paths, speed reductions and traffic calming. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
671. T3 assigns Council role as Directly responsible. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
672. T3 has Medium timeframe, Medium impact or reach, and cost category $$$. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
673. Mechanism: T3 changes exposure, behaviour, infrastructure availability, land management, emergency readiness, business procurement or advocacy settings. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
674. Dependency: T3 needs the relevant channel: Council works, planning amendment, community uptake, State support, water authority coordination, emergency-service coordination or private investment. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
675. Staging: T3 should be checked against the CEAP 2025, 2027 and 2030 milestones. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
676. Development feasibility: T3 affects whether new development can meet resilience expectations without later retrofit, especially for shade, water, transport, ESD, flood data or canopy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
677. Contested issue: T3 may create tension between upfront cost, land take, private autonomy, transport convenience, biodiversity retention, infrastructure standards and climate performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
678. Evidence gap: T3 needs implementation status, budget line, responsible unit and post-2024 progress data. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
679. T4 under Transport: Support e-scooter and e-bike share schemes in urban areas. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
680. T4 assigns Council role as Influence. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
681. T4 has Short timeframe, Low impact or reach, and cost category $. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
682. Mechanism: T4 changes exposure, behaviour, infrastructure availability, land management, emergency readiness, business procurement or advocacy settings. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
683. Dependency: T4 needs the relevant channel: Council works, planning amendment, community uptake, State support, water authority coordination, emergency-service coordination or private investment. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
684. Staging: T4 should be checked against the CEAP 2025, 2027 and 2030 milestones. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
685. Development feasibility: T4 affects whether new development can meet resilience expectations without later retrofit, especially for shade, water, transport, ESD, flood data or canopy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
686. Contested issue: T4 may create tension between upfront cost, land take, private autonomy, transport convenience, biodiversity retention, infrastructure standards and climate performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
687. Evidence gap: T4 needs implementation status, budget line, responsible unit and post-2024 progress data. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
688. T5 under Transport: Educate residents on active transport benefits and availability. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
689. T5 assigns Council role as Influence. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
690. T5 has Short timeframe, Low impact or reach, and cost category $. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
691. Mechanism: T5 changes exposure, behaviour, infrastructure availability, land management, emergency readiness, business procurement or advocacy settings. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
692. Dependency: T5 needs the relevant channel: Council works, planning amendment, community uptake, State support, water authority coordination, emergency-service coordination or private investment. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
693. Staging: T5 should be checked against the CEAP 2025, 2027 and 2030 milestones. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
694. Development feasibility: T5 affects whether new development can meet resilience expectations without later retrofit, especially for shade, water, transport, ESD, flood data or canopy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
695. Contested issue: T5 may create tension between upfront cost, land take, private autonomy, transport convenience, biodiversity retention, infrastructure standards and climate performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
696. Evidence gap: T5 needs implementation status, budget line, responsible unit and post-2024 progress data. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
697. T6 under Transport: Use capital works and planning to improve connectivity and local-service access for walking and cycling. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
698. T6 assigns Council role as Directly responsible and advocacy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
699. T6 has Long timeframe, Low impact or reach, and cost category $. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
700. Mechanism: T6 changes exposure, behaviour, infrastructure availability, land management, emergency readiness, business procurement or advocacy settings. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
701. Dependency: T6 needs the relevant channel: Council works, planning amendment, community uptake, State support, water authority coordination, emergency-service coordination or private investment. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
702. Staging: T6 should be checked against the CEAP 2025, 2027 and 2030 milestones. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
703. Development feasibility: T6 affects whether new development can meet resilience expectations without later retrofit, especially for shade, water, transport, ESD, flood data or canopy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
704. Contested issue: T6 may create tension between upfront cost, land take, private autonomy, transport convenience, biodiversity retention, infrastructure standards and climate performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
705. Evidence gap: T6 needs implementation status, budget line, responsible unit and post-2024 progress data. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
706. T7 under Transport: Prepare a municipal-wide Mitchell Integrated Transport Strategy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
707. T7 assigns Council role as Directly responsible. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
708. T7 has Medium timeframe, Low impact or reach, and cost category $$. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
709. Mechanism: T7 changes exposure, behaviour, infrastructure availability, land management, emergency readiness, business procurement or advocacy settings. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
710. Dependency: T7 needs the relevant channel: Council works, planning amendment, community uptake, State support, water authority coordination, emergency-service coordination or private investment. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
711. Staging: T7 should be checked against the CEAP 2025, 2027 and 2030 milestones. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
712. Development feasibility: T7 affects whether new development can meet resilience expectations without later retrofit, especially for shade, water, transport, ESD, flood data or canopy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
713. Contested issue: T7 may create tension between upfront cost, land take, private autonomy, transport convenience, biodiversity retention, infrastructure standards and climate performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
714. Evidence gap: T7 needs implementation status, budget line, responsible unit and post-2024 progress data. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
715. T8 under Transport: Encourage EV chargers at shopping centres, sports clubs, hospitals, schools and hotels. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
716. T8 assigns Council role as Influence. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
717. T8 has Short timeframe, High impact or reach, and cost category $$. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
718. Mechanism: T8 changes exposure, behaviour, infrastructure availability, land management, emergency readiness, business procurement or advocacy settings. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
719. Dependency: T8 needs the relevant channel: Council works, planning amendment, community uptake, State support, water authority coordination, emergency-service coordination or private investment. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
720. Staging: T8 should be checked against the CEAP 2025, 2027 and 2030 milestones. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
721. Development feasibility: T8 affects whether new development can meet resilience expectations without later retrofit, especially for shade, water, transport, ESD, flood data or canopy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
722. Contested issue: T8 may create tension between upfront cost, land take, private autonomy, transport convenience, biodiversity retention, infrastructure standards and climate performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
723. Evidence gap: T8 needs implementation status, budget line, responsible unit and post-2024 progress data. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
724. T9 under Transport: Host or support EV education on demonstrations, cost, range and charging. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
725. T9 assigns Council role as Influence. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
726. T9 has Short timeframe, High impact or reach, and cost category $. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
727. Mechanism: T9 changes exposure, behaviour, infrastructure availability, land management, emergency readiness, business procurement or advocacy settings. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
728. Dependency: T9 needs the relevant channel: Council works, planning amendment, community uptake, State support, water authority coordination, emergency-service coordination or private investment. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
729. Staging: T9 should be checked against the CEAP 2025, 2027 and 2030 milestones. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
730. Development feasibility: T9 affects whether new development can meet resilience expectations without later retrofit, especially for shade, water, transport, ESD, flood data or canopy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
731. Contested issue: T9 may create tension between upfront cost, land take, private autonomy, transport convenience, biodiversity retention, infrastructure standards and climate performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
732. Evidence gap: T9 needs implementation status, budget line, responsible unit and post-2024 progress data. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
733. T10 under Transport: Facilitate carshare infrastructure including EV options. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
734. T10 assigns Council role as Advocacy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
735. T10 has Medium timeframe, Medium impact or reach, and cost category $. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
736. Mechanism: T10 changes exposure, behaviour, infrastructure availability, land management, emergency readiness, business procurement or advocacy settings. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
737. Dependency: T10 needs the relevant channel: Council works, planning amendment, community uptake, State support, water authority coordination, emergency-service coordination or private investment. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
738. Staging: T10 should be checked against the CEAP 2025, 2027 and 2030 milestones. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
739. Development feasibility: T10 affects whether new development can meet resilience expectations without later retrofit, especially for shade, water, transport, ESD, flood data or canopy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
740. Contested issue: T10 may create tension between upfront cost, land take, private autonomy, transport convenience, biodiversity retention, infrastructure standards and climate performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
741. Evidence gap: T10 needs implementation status, budget line, responsible unit and post-2024 progress data. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
742. C1 under Community empowerment: Provide circular-economy education including FOGO, single-use plastic and waste reduction. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
743. C1 assigns Council role as Influence. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
744. C1 has Short timeframe, Low impact or reach, and cost category $. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
745. Mechanism: C1 changes exposure, behaviour, infrastructure availability, land management, emergency readiness, business procurement or advocacy settings. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
746. Dependency: C1 needs the relevant channel: Council works, planning amendment, community uptake, State support, water authority coordination, emergency-service coordination or private investment. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
747. Staging: C1 should be checked against the CEAP 2025, 2027 and 2030 milestones. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
748. Development feasibility: C1 affects whether new development can meet resilience expectations without later retrofit, especially for shade, water, transport, ESD, flood data or canopy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
749. Contested issue: C1 may create tension between upfront cost, land take, private autonomy, transport convenience, biodiversity retention, infrastructure standards and climate performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
750. Evidence gap: C1 needs implementation status, budget line, responsible unit and post-2024 progress data. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
751. C2 under Community empowerment: Support a reuse and repair cafe or tool library. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
752. C2 assigns Council role as Directly responsible. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
753. C2 has Short timeframe, Low impact or reach, and cost category $$. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
754. Mechanism: C2 changes exposure, behaviour, infrastructure availability, land management, emergency readiness, business procurement or advocacy settings. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
755. Dependency: C2 needs the relevant channel: Council works, planning amendment, community uptake, State support, water authority coordination, emergency-service coordination or private investment. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
756. Staging: C2 should be checked against the CEAP 2025, 2027 and 2030 milestones. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
757. Development feasibility: C2 affects whether new development can meet resilience expectations without later retrofit, especially for shade, water, transport, ESD, flood data or canopy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
758. Contested issue: C2 may create tension between upfront cost, land take, private autonomy, transport convenience, biodiversity retention, infrastructure standards and climate performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
759. Evidence gap: C2 needs implementation status, budget line, responsible unit and post-2024 progress data. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
760. C3 under Community empowerment: Develop climate outreach on impacts and solutions. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
761. C3 assigns Council role as Directly responsible. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
762. C3 has Short timeframe, Medium impact or reach, and cost category $$. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
763. Mechanism: C3 changes exposure, behaviour, infrastructure availability, land management, emergency readiness, business procurement or advocacy settings. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
764. Dependency: C3 needs the relevant channel: Council works, planning amendment, community uptake, State support, water authority coordination, emergency-service coordination or private investment. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
765. Staging: C3 should be checked against the CEAP 2025, 2027 and 2030 milestones. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
766. Development feasibility: C3 affects whether new development can meet resilience expectations without later retrofit, especially for shade, water, transport, ESD, flood data or canopy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
767. Contested issue: C3 may create tension between upfront cost, land take, private autonomy, transport convenience, biodiversity retention, infrastructure standards and climate performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
768. Evidence gap: C3 needs implementation status, budget line, responsible unit and post-2024 progress data. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
769. C4 under Community empowerment: Improve access to understandable climate data and projections. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
770. C4 assigns Council role as Influence. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
771. C4 has Short timeframe, Medium impact or reach, and cost category $. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
772. Mechanism: C4 changes exposure, behaviour, infrastructure availability, land management, emergency readiness, business procurement or advocacy settings. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
773. Dependency: C4 needs the relevant channel: Council works, planning amendment, community uptake, State support, water authority coordination, emergency-service coordination or private investment. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
774. Staging: C4 should be checked against the CEAP 2025, 2027 and 2030 milestones. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
775. Development feasibility: C4 affects whether new development can meet resilience expectations without later retrofit, especially for shade, water, transport, ESD, flood data or canopy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
776. Contested issue: C4 may create tension between upfront cost, land take, private autonomy, transport convenience, biodiversity retention, infrastructure standards and climate performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
777. Evidence gap: C4 needs implementation status, budget line, responsible unit and post-2024 progress data. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
778. C5 under Community empowerment: Develop community climate-change hubs. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
779. C5 assigns Council role as Influence. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
780. C5 has Short timeframe, Medium impact or reach, and cost category $$. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
781. Mechanism: C5 changes exposure, behaviour, infrastructure availability, land management, emergency readiness, business procurement or advocacy settings. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
782. Dependency: C5 needs the relevant channel: Council works, planning amendment, community uptake, State support, water authority coordination, emergency-service coordination or private investment. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
783. Staging: C5 should be checked against the CEAP 2025, 2027 and 2030 milestones. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
784. Development feasibility: C5 affects whether new development can meet resilience expectations without later retrofit, especially for shade, water, transport, ESD, flood data or canopy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
785. Contested issue: C5 may create tension between upfront cost, land take, private autonomy, transport convenience, biodiversity retention, infrastructure standards and climate performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
786. Evidence gap: C5 needs implementation status, budget line, responsible unit and post-2024 progress data. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
787. C6 under Community empowerment: Support environment and sustainability groups to expand outreach. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
788. C6 assigns Council role as Influence. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
789. C6 has Short timeframe, Medium impact or reach, and cost category $$. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
790. Mechanism: C6 changes exposure, behaviour, infrastructure availability, land management, emergency readiness, business procurement or advocacy settings. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
791. Dependency: C6 needs the relevant channel: Council works, planning amendment, community uptake, State support, water authority coordination, emergency-service coordination or private investment. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
792. Staging: C6 should be checked against the CEAP 2025, 2027 and 2030 milestones. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
793. Development feasibility: C6 affects whether new development can meet resilience expectations without later retrofit, especially for shade, water, transport, ESD, flood data or canopy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
794. Contested issue: C6 may create tension between upfront cost, land take, private autonomy, transport convenience, biodiversity retention, infrastructure standards and climate performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
795. Evidence gap: C6 needs implementation status, budget line, responsible unit and post-2024 progress data. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
796. C7 under Community empowerment: Support youth climate and environmental leadership. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
797. C7 assigns Council role as Directly responsible. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
798. C7 has Short timeframe, Low impact or reach, and cost category $. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
799. Mechanism: C7 changes exposure, behaviour, infrastructure availability, land management, emergency readiness, business procurement or advocacy settings. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
800. Dependency: C7 needs the relevant channel: Council works, planning amendment, community uptake, State support, water authority coordination, emergency-service coordination or private investment. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
801. Staging: C7 should be checked against the CEAP 2025, 2027 and 2030 milestones. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
802. Development feasibility: C7 affects whether new development can meet resilience expectations without later retrofit, especially for shade, water, transport, ESD, flood data or canopy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
803. Contested issue: C7 may create tension between upfront cost, land take, private autonomy, transport convenience, biodiversity retention, infrastructure standards and climate performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
804. Evidence gap: C7 needs implementation status, budget line, responsible unit and post-2024 progress data. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
805. C8 under Community empowerment: Advocate to State and Federal governments for stronger net-zero support and emissions reduction. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
806. C8 assigns Council role as Advocacy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
807. C8 has Short timeframe, High impact or reach, and cost category $. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
808. Mechanism: C8 changes exposure, behaviour, infrastructure availability, land management, emergency readiness, business procurement or advocacy settings. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
809. Dependency: C8 needs the relevant channel: Council works, planning amendment, community uptake, State support, water authority coordination, emergency-service coordination or private investment. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
810. Staging: C8 should be checked against the CEAP 2025, 2027 and 2030 milestones. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
811. Development feasibility: C8 affects whether new development can meet resilience expectations without later retrofit, especially for shade, water, transport, ESD, flood data or canopy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
812. Contested issue: C8 may create tension between upfront cost, land take, private autonomy, transport convenience, biodiversity retention, infrastructure standards and climate performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
813. Evidence gap: C8 needs implementation status, budget line, responsible unit and post-2024 progress data. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)

2050 Risk Register

814. RID034 is a Extreme 2050 risk: Loss of life and heat-related health issues from Extreme heat. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
815. RID034 sits in Council area Public health and wellbeing. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
816. RID034 has consequence Critical and likelihood Almost certain at 2050. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
817. Mechanism: RID034 turns climate hazard into health impact, service demand, asset damage, ecological loss, economic loss, evacuation demand, legal exposure or reputational exposure. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
818. Development feasibility: RID034 can affect a proposal if it increases heat exposure, flood exposure, bushfire evacuation demand, infrastructure vulnerability, agricultural disruption or biodiversity loss. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
819. RID013 is a Extreme 2050 risk: Loss of life from Bushfire. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
820. RID013 sits in Council area Public health and wellbeing. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
821. RID013 has consequence Critical and likelihood Likely at 2050. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
822. Mechanism: RID013 turns climate hazard into health impact, service demand, asset damage, ecological loss, economic loss, evacuation demand, legal exposure or reputational exposure. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
823. Development feasibility: RID013 can affect a proposal if it increases heat exposure, flood exposure, bushfire evacuation demand, infrastructure vulnerability, agricultural disruption or biodiversity loss. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
824. RID049 is a Extreme 2050 risk: Loss of life from Riverine flooding. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
825. RID049 sits in Council area Public health and wellbeing. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
826. RID049 has consequence Critical and likelihood Likely at 2050. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
827. Mechanism: RID049 turns climate hazard into health impact, service demand, asset damage, ecological loss, economic loss, evacuation demand, legal exposure or reputational exposure. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
828. Development feasibility: RID049 can affect a proposal if it increases heat exposure, flood exposure, bushfire evacuation demand, infrastructure vulnerability, agricultural disruption or biodiversity loss. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
829. RID001 is a Very high 2050 risk: Damage and loss of assets and infrastructure from Bushfire. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
830. RID001 sits in Council area Assets and infrastructure. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
831. RID001 has consequence Major and likelihood Likely at 2050. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
832. Mechanism: RID001 turns climate hazard into health impact, service demand, asset damage, ecological loss, economic loss, evacuation demand, legal exposure or reputational exposure. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
833. Development feasibility: RID001 can affect a proposal if it increases heat exposure, flood exposure, bushfire evacuation demand, infrastructure vulnerability, agricultural disruption or biodiversity loss. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
834. RID003 is a Very high 2050 risk: Population displacement to evacuation centres from Bushfire. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
835. RID003 sits in Council area Community development. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
836. RID003 has consequence Major and likelihood Likely at 2050. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
837. Mechanism: RID003 turns climate hazard into health impact, service demand, asset damage, ecological loss, economic loss, evacuation demand, legal exposure or reputational exposure. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
838. Development feasibility: RID003 can affect a proposal if it increases heat exposure, flood exposure, bushfire evacuation demand, infrastructure vulnerability, agricultural disruption or biodiversity loss. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
839. RID004 is a Very high 2050 risk: Property damage and loss from Bushfire. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
840. RID004 sits in Council area Community development. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
841. RID004 has consequence Major and likelihood Likely at 2050. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
842. Mechanism: RID004 turns climate hazard into health impact, service demand, asset damage, ecological loss, economic loss, evacuation demand, legal exposure or reputational exposure. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
843. Development feasibility: RID004 can affect a proposal if it increases heat exposure, flood exposure, bushfire evacuation demand, infrastructure vulnerability, agricultural disruption or biodiversity loss. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
844. RID010 is a Very high 2050 risk: Habitat and biodiversity loss from Bushfire. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
845. RID010 sits in Council area Environment and parks. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
846. RID010 has consequence Major and likelihood Likely at 2050. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
847. Mechanism: RID010 turns climate hazard into health impact, service demand, asset damage, ecological loss, economic loss, evacuation demand, legal exposure or reputational exposure. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
848. Development feasibility: RID010 can affect a proposal if it increases heat exposure, flood exposure, bushfire evacuation demand, infrastructure vulnerability, agricultural disruption or biodiversity loss. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
849. RID016 is a Very high 2050 risk: Loss of agricultural produce from Drought. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
850. RID016 sits in Council area Economic development. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
851. RID016 has consequence Major and likelihood Likely at 2050. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
852. Mechanism: RID016 turns climate hazard into health impact, service demand, asset damage, ecological loss, economic loss, evacuation demand, legal exposure or reputational exposure. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
853. Development feasibility: RID016 can affect a proposal if it increases heat exposure, flood exposure, bushfire evacuation demand, infrastructure vulnerability, agricultural disruption or biodiversity loss. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
854. RID018 is a Very high 2050 risk: Habitat and biodiversity loss from Drought. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
855. RID018 sits in Council area Environment and parks. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
856. RID018 has consequence Major and likelihood Likely at 2050. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
857. Mechanism: RID018 turns climate hazard into health impact, service demand, asset damage, ecological loss, economic loss, evacuation demand, legal exposure or reputational exposure. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
858. Development feasibility: RID018 can affect a proposal if it increases heat exposure, flood exposure, bushfire evacuation demand, infrastructure vulnerability, agricultural disruption or biodiversity loss. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
859. RID021 is a Very high 2050 risk: Food security impacts from Drought. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
860. RID021 sits in Council area Public health and wellbeing. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
861. RID021 has consequence Major and likelihood Likely at 2050. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
862. Mechanism: RID021 turns climate hazard into health impact, service demand, asset damage, ecological loss, economic loss, evacuation demand, legal exposure or reputational exposure. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
863. Development feasibility: RID021 can affect a proposal if it increases heat exposure, flood exposure, bushfire evacuation demand, infrastructure vulnerability, agricultural disruption or biodiversity loss. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
864. RID041 is a Very high 2050 risk: Damage and loss of public assets and infrastructure from Riverine flooding. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
865. RID041 sits in Council area Assets and infrastructure. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
866. RID041 has consequence Major and likelihood Likely at 2050. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
867. Mechanism: RID041 turns climate hazard into health impact, service demand, asset damage, ecological loss, economic loss, evacuation demand, legal exposure or reputational exposure. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
868. Development feasibility: RID041 can affect a proposal if it increases heat exposure, flood exposure, bushfire evacuation demand, infrastructure vulnerability, agricultural disruption or biodiversity loss. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
869. RID042 is a Very high 2050 risk: Damage and loss to private property from Riverine flooding. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
870. RID042 sits in Council area Community development. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
871. RID042 has consequence Major and likelihood Likely at 2050. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
872. Mechanism: RID042 turns climate hazard into health impact, service demand, asset damage, ecological loss, economic loss, evacuation demand, legal exposure or reputational exposure. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
873. Development feasibility: RID042 can affect a proposal if it increases heat exposure, flood exposure, bushfire evacuation demand, infrastructure vulnerability, agricultural disruption or biodiversity loss. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
874. RID043 is a Very high 2050 risk: Population displacement to evacuation centres from Riverine flooding. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
875. RID043 sits in Council area Community development. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
876. RID043 has consequence Major and likelihood Likely at 2050. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
877. Mechanism: RID043 turns climate hazard into health impact, service demand, asset damage, ecological loss, economic loss, evacuation demand, legal exposure or reputational exposure. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
878. Development feasibility: RID043 can affect a proposal if it increases heat exposure, flood exposure, bushfire evacuation demand, infrastructure vulnerability, agricultural disruption or biodiversity loss. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
879. RID046 is a Very high 2050 risk: Damage to private-sector economic assets from Riverine flooding. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
880. RID046 sits in Council area Economic development. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
881. RID046 has consequence Major and likelihood Likely at 2050. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
882. Mechanism: RID046 turns climate hazard into health impact, service demand, asset damage, ecological loss, economic loss, evacuation demand, legal exposure or reputational exposure. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
883. Development feasibility: RID046 can affect a proposal if it increases heat exposure, flood exposure, bushfire evacuation demand, infrastructure vulnerability, agricultural disruption or biodiversity loss. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
884. RID047 is a Very high 2050 risk: Damage to agriculture from Riverine flooding. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
885. RID047 sits in Council area Economic development. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
886. RID047 has consequence Major and likelihood Likely at 2050. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
887. Mechanism: RID047 turns climate hazard into health impact, service demand, asset damage, ecological loss, economic loss, evacuation demand, legal exposure or reputational exposure. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
888. Development feasibility: RID047 can affect a proposal if it increases heat exposure, flood exposure, bushfire evacuation demand, infrastructure vulnerability, agricultural disruption or biodiversity loss. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
889. RID017 is a Very high 2050 risk: Increased irrigation demand from Drought. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
890. RID017 sits in Council area Economic development. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
891. RID017 has consequence Major and likelihood Likely at 2050. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
892. Mechanism: RID017 turns climate hazard into health impact, service demand, asset damage, ecological loss, economic loss, evacuation demand, legal exposure or reputational exposure. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
893. Development feasibility: RID017 can affect a proposal if it increases heat exposure, flood exposure, bushfire evacuation demand, infrastructure vulnerability, agricultural disruption or biodiversity loss. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
894. RID024 is a Very high 2050 risk: Water scarcity and supply issues from Drought. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
895. RID024 sits in Council area Water. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
896. RID024 has consequence Major and likelihood Likely at 2050. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
897. Mechanism: RID024 turns climate hazard into health impact, service demand, asset damage, ecological loss, economic loss, evacuation demand, legal exposure or reputational exposure. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
898. Development feasibility: RID024 can affect a proposal if it increases heat exposure, flood exposure, bushfire evacuation demand, infrastructure vulnerability, agricultural disruption or biodiversity loss. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
899. RID044 is a Very high 2050 risk: Disruption of services from Riverine flooding. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
900. RID044 sits in Council area Corporate services. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
901. RID044 has consequence Major and likelihood Likely at 2050. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
902. Mechanism: RID044 turns climate hazard into health impact, service demand, asset damage, ecological loss, economic loss, evacuation demand, legal exposure or reputational exposure. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
903. Development feasibility: RID044 can affect a proposal if it increases heat exposure, flood exposure, bushfire evacuation demand, infrastructure vulnerability, agricultural disruption or biodiversity loss. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
904. RID048 is a Very high 2050 risk: Reputational damage due to lack of preparedness and response from Riverine flooding. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
905. RID048 sits in Council area Leadership and governance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
906. RID048 has consequence Major and likelihood Likely at 2050. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
907. Mechanism: RID048 turns climate hazard into health impact, service demand, asset damage, ecological loss, economic loss, evacuation demand, legal exposure or reputational exposure. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
908. Development feasibility: RID048 can affect a proposal if it increases heat exposure, flood exposure, bushfire evacuation demand, infrastructure vulnerability, agricultural disruption or biodiversity loss. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)

Beveridge Central Active Open Space Implementation Case

909. Beveridge had an estimated population of 9,120 in 2024. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
910. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
911. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
912. Beveridge is projected to exceed 112,000 people by 2046. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
913. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
914. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
915. Beveridge is projected to grow from 4,243 people in 2021 to 112,187 in 2046. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
916. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
917. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
918. The projected Beveridge growth from 2021 to 2046 is 2,545%. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
919. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
920. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
921. Mitchell Shire is forecast to exceed 221,000 people by 2046. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
922. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
923. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
924. The Beveridge Central PSP set aside 6.79 ha for active open space. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
925. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
926. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
927. The Beveridge Central precinct is forecast for more than 3,400 homes and about 9,400 residents. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
928. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
929. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
930. The AOS site is at Patterson Road and Lithgow Street. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
931. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
932. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
933. The site comprises three Council-owned parcels. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
934. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
935. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
936. Land Parcel 1 is 2.29 ha at 34 Lithgow Street. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
937. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
938. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
939. Land Parcel 2 is 2.33 ha at 72 Lithgow Street. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
940. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
941. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
942. Land Parcel 3 is 2.48 ha at 86 Patterson Road. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
943. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
944. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
945. Patterson Road duplication and Lithgow Street intersection expansion require 0.32 ha. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
946. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
947. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
948. The developable sport and recreation area is 6.47 ha after road reservation. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
949. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
950. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
951. The site falls 6.4 m from northwest to southeast. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
952. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
953. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
954. The average grade is 1:60. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
955. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
956. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
957. The site has no formal watercourses. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
958. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
959. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
960. Minor valleys direct overland flow into three southeast dams. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
961. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
962. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
963. Basalt bedrock is predominantly within the top half metre across the western section. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
964. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
965. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
966. Basalt bedrock depth increases to about 2 m in the southwest corner. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
967. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
968. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
969. Shallow basalt can slow excavation and increase costs. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
970. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
971. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
972. The site has 86 trees and 21 street trees. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
973. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
974. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
975. The master plan retains all 21 street trees. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
976. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
977. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
978. An arborist assessed 18 trees as High Retention Value. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
979. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
980. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
981. The master plan retains 6 of 18 High Retention Value trees. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
982. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
983. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
984. Offset planting is supported because all High Retention Value trees cannot be retained with the sports layout. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
985. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
986. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
987. The draft master plan was exhibited from 21 February to 24 March 2025. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
988. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
989. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
990. Community and stakeholder feedback contributed to finalising the master plan. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
991. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
992. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
993. The master plan includes about 200 car parking spaces in the executive summary. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
994. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
995. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
996. The detailed cost plan describes about 190 car spaces. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
997. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
998. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
999. The car park uses left-in and left-out turns at Lithgow Street and Patterson Road. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1000. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1001. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1002. Patterson Road access is constrained because it will become a 4-lane road. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1003. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1004. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1005. Lithgow Street access is constrained by future intersection expansion, slip lanes and right-turn lanes. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1006. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1007. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1008. Larger events require off-reserve parking plans. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1009. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1010. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1011. Car-park trees are included to reduce bitumen heat-island effect. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1012. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1013. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1014. WSUD is recommended for passive irrigation of car-park trees and landscaping. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1015. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1016. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1017. Council Urban Forest Strategy standard is 1 tree per 5 car parks. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1018. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1019. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1020. The plan comes close to the 1 tree per 5 car parks standard but is constrained near small-sided pitches. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1021. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1022. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1023. No tree planting can be provided between the car park and small-sided pitches because of space, leaf-litter maintenance and root-damage risk. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1024. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1025. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1026. The main soccer pitch lighting is planned at 500 lux. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1027. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1028. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1029. Community soccer pitch lighting is planned at 100 lux. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1030. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1031. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1032. The master plan includes four synthetic small-sided soccer pitches. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1033. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1034. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1035. The master plan includes two soccer pitches with cricket oval overlay. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1036. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1037. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1038. The master plan includes four cricket practice nets. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1039. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1040. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1041. The master plan includes a district playspace with picnic tables, BBQ and shelter. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1042. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1043. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1044. The master plan includes an ephemeral wetland to control overland stormwater. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1045. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1046. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1047. The wetland has a secondary benefit as informal sitting space when dry. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1048. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1049. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1050. The master plan includes an underground water tank for stormwater reuse. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1051. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1052. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1053. The community facility concept includes rainwater harvesting for toilet reuse and garden-bed irrigation. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1054. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1055. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1056. Design-development ESD options include roof solar, rainwater harvesting, LED lighting controls and high-efficiency fixtures. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1057. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1058. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1059. The total estimated master-plan cost is $34.790 million ex GST in the study table. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1060. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1061. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1062. The cost-plan appendix states a $34.365 million base scheme excluding GST. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1063. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1064. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1065. Stage A is estimated at $18.850 million ex GST. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1066. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1067. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1068. Stage B is estimated at $15.940 million ex GST. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1069. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1070. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1071. The car park is costed at $2.230 million. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1072. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1073. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1074. The ephemeral wetland is costed at $195,000. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1075. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1076. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1077. Tree planting of 150 semi-mature trees is costed at $75,000. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1078. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1079. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1080. Street furniture is costed at $200,000. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1081. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1082. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1083. Site services infrastructure is costed at $1.255 million. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1084. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1085. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1086. The pedestrian path network is costed at $405,000. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1087. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1088. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1089. Cost escalation beyond July 2025 is excluded. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1090. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1091. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1092. Land acquisition costs are excluded. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1093. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1094. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1095. Harlock Consulting recommends budgeting 4% per annum for cost escalation up to construction from July 2025. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1096. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1097. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1098. Mitchell Urban Forest Strategy current Shire canopy coverage is 12%. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1099. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1100. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1101. Northern and central townships have higher canopy coverage than southern townships including Beveridge. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1102. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1103. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1104. Council manages about 41,000 street trees and 15,000 park trees. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1105. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1106. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1107. The Urban Forest Strategy target is 20% average township canopy by 2043 and 30% by 2073. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1108. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1109. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1110. The Urban Forest Strategy aspires to lift average open-space tree canopy from 7% to 30%. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1111. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1112. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1113. New Council buildings above $15 million require minimum 5 Star Green Star certified, with 6 Star considered case by case. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1114. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1115. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1116. New Council buildings costing $6-15 million must be 5 Star Green Star compliant or reach at least 70% Built Environment Sustainability Scorecard rating. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1117. Mechanism: this Beveridge fact affects heat exposure, stormwater, transport emissions, construction carbon, asset cost, maintenance load or growth-area service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)
1118. Development feasibility: this fact shows CEAP implementation must be checked at master-plan, concept-design, cost-plan, detailed-design and capital-budget stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt; msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt)

Staging and Dependency Sequences

1119. Renewable electricity precedes residual demand management because July 2022 renewable contracts make electricity close to zero while audits, solar and LEDs reduce future load. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1120. Feasibility implication: delayed early actions raise retrofit cost, residual emissions, asset vulnerability or community exposure. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1121. FOGO precedes landfill residual management because the plan expects FOGO to cut new landfill emissions before legacy landfill remains. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1122. Feasibility implication: delayed early actions raise retrofit cost, residual emissions, asset vulnerability or community exposure. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1123. Fleet policy and transition planning precede full EV replacement because charging infrastructure and asset renewal cycles must be ready. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1124. Feasibility implication: delayed early actions raise retrofit cost, residual emissions, asset vulnerability or community exposure. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1125. Technical specifications and Sustainable Infrastructure Policy precede low-carbon capital works because embodied emissions are locked in through materials and construction standards. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1126. Feasibility implication: delayed early actions raise retrofit cost, residual emissions, asset vulnerability or community exposure. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1127. Urban Forest Strategy, planning-scheme advocacy, shade and respite-facility assessment must proceed together because heat risk is outdoor and indoor. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1128. Feasibility implication: delayed early actions raise retrofit cost, residual emissions, asset vulnerability or community exposure. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1129. Emergency-plan revision, relief-centre assessment, infrastructure assessment and flood-model advocacy must occur before extreme events. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1130. Feasibility implication: delayed early actions raise retrofit cost, residual emissions, asset vulnerability or community exposure. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1131. Integrated water management must combine stormwater, drainage, sustainable water use and reuse because flood and drought are linked hydrological stresses. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1132. Feasibility implication: delayed early actions raise retrofit cost, residual emissions, asset vulnerability or community exposure. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1133. Land-management support, Agriculture Victoria advocacy, soil-carbon research, methane feed research and biolinks need to operate as a private-land advisory system. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1134. Feasibility implication: delayed early actions raise retrofit cost, residual emissions, asset vulnerability or community exposure. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1135. Household electrification, solar, batteries, rental-property agreements, social-housing upgrades and low-income appliance subsidies must be coordinated for equity. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1136. Feasibility implication: delayed early actions raise retrofit cost, residual emissions, asset vulnerability or community exposure. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1137. Business emissions work needs renewable-energy buying groups, key-emitter engagement and supply-chain campaigns. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1138. Feasibility implication: delayed early actions raise retrofit cost, residual emissions, asset vulnerability or community exposure. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1139. Transport mode shift needs public transport advocacy, active-transport infrastructure, EV chargers, EV education, carshare and local services. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1140. Feasibility implication: delayed early actions raise retrofit cost, residual emissions, asset vulnerability or community exposure. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1141. Community behaviour change needs outreach, data access, hubs, youth leadership and repair infrastructure. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1142. Feasibility implication: delayed early actions raise retrofit cost, residual emissions, asset vulnerability or community exposure. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1143. Beveridge delivery must resolve road reservation, grading, bedrock, field layout, car-park access, WSUD, tree planting, pavilion ESD, wetland design and staging. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1144. Feasibility implication: delayed early actions raise retrofit cost, residual emissions, asset vulnerability or community exposure. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1145. Beveridge active transport must be treated as emissions design as well as traffic engineering. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1146. Feasibility implication: delayed early actions raise retrofit cost, residual emissions, asset vulnerability or community exposure. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1147. Beveridge heat delivery depends on car-park trees, boulevard canopy, play-space shade, seating, drinking water and retained street trees. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1148. Feasibility implication: delayed early actions raise retrofit cost, residual emissions, asset vulnerability or community exposure. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1149. Beveridge water delivery depends on overland flow, ephemeral wetland, WSUD passive irrigation and underground tanks. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1150. Feasibility implication: delayed early actions raise retrofit cost, residual emissions, asset vulnerability or community exposure. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1151. Tree retention must be traded against field geometry and synthetic-surface maintenance risk. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1152. Feasibility implication: delayed early actions raise retrofit cost, residual emissions, asset vulnerability or community exposure. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1153. Stage A, Stage B, escalation exclusions and 4% annual escalation show climate features are vulnerable if not protected in scope. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1154. Feasibility implication: delayed early actions raise retrofit cost, residual emissions, asset vulnerability or community exposure. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1155. Heat-island controls, flood data, ESD standards and canopy protection need planning-scheme or higher-government changes. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1156. Feasibility implication: delayed early actions raise retrofit cost, residual emissions, asset vulnerability or community exposure. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1157. 2025, 2027, 2030, 2035, 2037 and 2043 are audit checkpoints for targets and delivery. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1158. Feasibility implication: delayed early actions raise retrofit cost, residual emissions, asset vulnerability or community exposure. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

Contested Issues and Submissions

1159. The CEAP records workshops, surveys and a public forum but the corpus lacks raw submissions. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1160. Analytical implication: this issue should be tracked in future Council reports because it can change cost, land yield, acceptance, equity, risk or emissions performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1161. The CEAP records business and industry leader input but the corpus lacks industry submissions. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1162. Analytical implication: this issue should be tracked in future Council reports because it can change cost, land yield, acceptance, equity, risk or emissions performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1163. The CEAP records a Climate Emergency Community Reference Group but the corpus lacks minutes or minority positions. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1164. Analytical implication: this issue should be tracked in future Council reports because it can change cost, land yield, acceptance, equity, risk or emissions performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1165. The Beveridge draft master plan was exhibited from 21 February to 24 March 2025 but the corpus lacks individual submissions. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1166. Analytical implication: this issue should be tracked in future Council reports because it can change cost, land yield, acceptance, equity, risk or emissions performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1167. Tree retention versus sports-field layout is contested because only 6 of 18 High Retention Value trees are retained. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1168. Analytical implication: this issue should be tracked in future Council reports because it can change cost, land yield, acceptance, equity, risk or emissions performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1169. Synthetic pitch performance versus tree planting is contested because trees near synthetic surfaces create leaf-litter and root risks. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1170. Analytical implication: this issue should be tracked in future Council reports because it can change cost, land yield, acceptance, equity, risk or emissions performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1171. Car dependency versus active transport is contested because the reserve includes about 190-200 parking spaces while the CEAP seeks sustainable transport. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1172. Analytical implication: this issue should be tracked in future Council reports because it can change cost, land yield, acceptance, equity, risk or emissions performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1173. Access convenience versus arterial-road geometry is contested because both road entries are left-in and left-out. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1174. Analytical implication: this issue should be tracked in future Council reports because it can change cost, land yield, acceptance, equity, risk or emissions performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1175. Event parking is contested because larger events need off-reserve parking plans. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1176. Analytical implication: this issue should be tracked in future Council reports because it can change cost, land yield, acceptance, equity, risk or emissions performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1177. Climate performance versus escalation is contested because escalation beyond July 2025 is excluded. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1178. Analytical implication: this issue should be tracked in future Council reports because it can change cost, land yield, acceptance, equity, risk or emissions performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1179. Residential gas replacement is an equity issue because low-income households need subsidies. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1180. Analytical implication: this issue should be tracked in future Council reports because it can change cost, land yield, acceptance, equity, risk or emissions performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1181. Rental solar is contested because landlord-tenant mechanisms need State facilitation. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1182. Analytical implication: this issue should be tracked in future Council reports because it can change cost, land yield, acceptance, equity, risk or emissions performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1183. Industrial emissions are contested because cement manufacturing alternatives sit outside household programs. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1184. Analytical implication: this issue should be tracked in future Council reports because it can change cost, land yield, acceptance, equity, risk or emissions performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1185. Flood-model adequacy is contested because climate-adjusted 1-in-100 year modelling is required for planning confidence. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1186. Analytical implication: this issue should be tracked in future Council reports because it can change cost, land yield, acceptance, equity, risk or emissions performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1187. Planned, ecological and cultural burning is framed as an option to investigate rather than an automatic program. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1188. Analytical implication: this issue should be tracked in future Council reports because it can change cost, land yield, acceptance, equity, risk or emissions performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1189. Private-land canopy protection is contested because Council influence is weaker than Council control. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1190. Analytical implication: this issue should be tracked in future Council reports because it can change cost, land yield, acceptance, equity, risk or emissions performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1191. Offsets are contested because Council expects carbon credits but prioritises absolute emissions reduction. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1192. Analytical implication: this issue should be tracked in future Council reports because it can change cost, land yield, acceptance, equity, risk or emissions performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1193. Landfill boundary accounting is contested because waste may move outside the Shire while legacy emissions remain. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1194. Analytical implication: this issue should be tracked in future Council reports because it can change cost, land yield, acceptance, equity, risk or emissions performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1195. Capital scope is contested because climate features can be treated as either core scope or optional enhancement. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1196. Analytical implication: this issue should be tracked in future Council reports because it can change cost, land yield, acceptance, equity, risk or emissions performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1197. Beveridge shows that WSUD, tree planting, wetland, paths, ESD and rainwater harvesting need protection through cost planning. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1198. Analytical implication: this issue should be tracked in future Council reports because it can change cost, land yield, acceptance, equity, risk or emissions performance. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

Development Feasibility Tests

1199. Feasibility test 1: assess heat exposure because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1200. Mechanism for feasibility test 1: unresolved heat exposure creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1201. Feasibility test 2: assess flood exposure because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1202. Mechanism for feasibility test 2: unresolved flood exposure creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1203. Feasibility test 3: assess bushfire evacuation because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1204. Mechanism for feasibility test 3: unresolved bushfire evacuation creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1205. Feasibility test 4: assess transport emissions because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1206. Mechanism for feasibility test 4: unresolved transport emissions creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1207. Feasibility test 5: assess construction emissions because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1208. Mechanism for feasibility test 5: unresolved construction emissions creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1209. Feasibility test 6: assess operating energy because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1210. Mechanism for feasibility test 6: unresolved operating energy creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1211. Feasibility test 7: assess tree retention because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1212. Mechanism for feasibility test 7: unresolved tree retention creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1213. Feasibility test 8: assess stormwater reuse because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1214. Mechanism for feasibility test 8: unresolved stormwater reuse creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1215. Feasibility test 9: assess capital escalation because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1216. Mechanism for feasibility test 9: unresolved capital escalation creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1217. Feasibility test 10: assess community equity because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1218. Mechanism for feasibility test 10: unresolved community equity creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1219. Feasibility test 11: assess private-land uptake because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1220. Mechanism for feasibility test 11: unresolved private-land uptake creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1221. Feasibility test 12: assess agricultural resilience because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1222. Mechanism for feasibility test 12: unresolved agricultural resilience creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1223. Feasibility test 13: assess industrial emissions because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1224. Mechanism for feasibility test 13: unresolved industrial emissions creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1225. Feasibility test 14: assess emergency-centre capacity because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1226. Mechanism for feasibility test 14: unresolved emergency-centre capacity creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1227. Feasibility test 15: assess public-realm comfort because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1228. Mechanism for feasibility test 15: unresolved public-realm comfort creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1229. Feasibility test 16: assess heat exposure because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1230. Mechanism for feasibility test 16: unresolved heat exposure creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1231. Feasibility test 17: assess flood exposure because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1232. Mechanism for feasibility test 17: unresolved flood exposure creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1233. Feasibility test 18: assess bushfire evacuation because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1234. Mechanism for feasibility test 18: unresolved bushfire evacuation creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1235. Feasibility test 19: assess transport emissions because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1236. Mechanism for feasibility test 19: unresolved transport emissions creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1237. Feasibility test 20: assess construction emissions because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1238. Mechanism for feasibility test 20: unresolved construction emissions creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1239. Feasibility test 21: assess operating energy because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1240. Mechanism for feasibility test 21: unresolved operating energy creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1241. Feasibility test 22: assess tree retention because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1242. Mechanism for feasibility test 22: unresolved tree retention creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1243. Feasibility test 23: assess stormwater reuse because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1244. Mechanism for feasibility test 23: unresolved stormwater reuse creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1245. Feasibility test 24: assess capital escalation because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1246. Mechanism for feasibility test 24: unresolved capital escalation creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1247. Feasibility test 25: assess community equity because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1248. Mechanism for feasibility test 25: unresolved community equity creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1249. Feasibility test 26: assess private-land uptake because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1250. Mechanism for feasibility test 26: unresolved private-land uptake creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1251. Feasibility test 27: assess agricultural resilience because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1252. Mechanism for feasibility test 27: unresolved agricultural resilience creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1253. Feasibility test 28: assess industrial emissions because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1254. Mechanism for feasibility test 28: unresolved industrial emissions creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1255. Feasibility test 29: assess emergency-centre capacity because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1256. Mechanism for feasibility test 29: unresolved emergency-centre capacity creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1257. Feasibility test 30: assess public-realm comfort because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1258. Mechanism for feasibility test 30: unresolved public-realm comfort creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1259. Feasibility test 31: assess heat exposure because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1260. Mechanism for feasibility test 31: unresolved heat exposure creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1261. Feasibility test 32: assess flood exposure because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1262. Mechanism for feasibility test 32: unresolved flood exposure creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1263. Feasibility test 33: assess bushfire evacuation because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1264. Mechanism for feasibility test 33: unresolved bushfire evacuation creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1265. Feasibility test 34: assess transport emissions because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1266. Mechanism for feasibility test 34: unresolved transport emissions creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1267. Feasibility test 35: assess construction emissions because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1268. Mechanism for feasibility test 35: unresolved construction emissions creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1269. Feasibility test 36: assess operating energy because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1270. Mechanism for feasibility test 36: unresolved operating energy creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1271. Feasibility test 37: assess tree retention because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1272. Mechanism for feasibility test 37: unresolved tree retention creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1273. Feasibility test 38: assess stormwater reuse because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1274. Mechanism for feasibility test 38: unresolved stormwater reuse creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1275. Feasibility test 39: assess capital escalation because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1276. Mechanism for feasibility test 39: unresolved capital escalation creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1277. Feasibility test 40: assess community equity because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1278. Mechanism for feasibility test 40: unresolved community equity creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1279. Feasibility test 41: assess private-land uptake because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1280. Mechanism for feasibility test 41: unresolved private-land uptake creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1281. Feasibility test 42: assess agricultural resilience because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1282. Mechanism for feasibility test 42: unresolved agricultural resilience creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1283. Feasibility test 43: assess industrial emissions because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1284. Mechanism for feasibility test 43: unresolved industrial emissions creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1285. Feasibility test 44: assess emergency-centre capacity because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1286. Mechanism for feasibility test 44: unresolved emergency-centre capacity creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1287. Feasibility test 45: assess public-realm comfort because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1288. Mechanism for feasibility test 45: unresolved public-realm comfort creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1289. Feasibility test 46: assess heat exposure because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1290. Mechanism for feasibility test 46: unresolved heat exposure creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1291. Feasibility test 47: assess flood exposure because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1292. Mechanism for feasibility test 47: unresolved flood exposure creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1293. Feasibility test 48: assess bushfire evacuation because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1294. Mechanism for feasibility test 48: unresolved bushfire evacuation creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1295. Feasibility test 49: assess transport emissions because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1296. Mechanism for feasibility test 49: unresolved transport emissions creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1297. Feasibility test 50: assess construction emissions because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1298. Mechanism for feasibility test 50: unresolved construction emissions creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1299. Feasibility test 51: assess operating energy because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1300. Mechanism for feasibility test 51: unresolved operating energy creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1301. Feasibility test 52: assess tree retention because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1302. Mechanism for feasibility test 52: unresolved tree retention creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1303. Feasibility test 53: assess stormwater reuse because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1304. Mechanism for feasibility test 53: unresolved stormwater reuse creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1305. Feasibility test 54: assess capital escalation because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1306. Mechanism for feasibility test 54: unresolved capital escalation creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1307. Feasibility test 55: assess community equity because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1308. Mechanism for feasibility test 55: unresolved community equity creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1309. Feasibility test 56: assess private-land uptake because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1310. Mechanism for feasibility test 56: unresolved private-land uptake creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1311. Feasibility test 57: assess agricultural resilience because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1312. Mechanism for feasibility test 57: unresolved agricultural resilience creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1313. Feasibility test 58: assess industrial emissions because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1314. Mechanism for feasibility test 58: unresolved industrial emissions creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1315. Feasibility test 59: assess emergency-centre capacity because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1316. Mechanism for feasibility test 59: unresolved emergency-centre capacity creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1317. Feasibility test 60: assess public-realm comfort because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1318. Mechanism for feasibility test 60: unresolved public-realm comfort creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1319. Feasibility test 61: assess heat exposure because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1320. Mechanism for feasibility test 61: unresolved heat exposure creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1321. Feasibility test 62: assess flood exposure because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1322. Mechanism for feasibility test 62: unresolved flood exposure creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1323. Feasibility test 63: assess bushfire evacuation because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1324. Mechanism for feasibility test 63: unresolved bushfire evacuation creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1325. Feasibility test 64: assess transport emissions because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1326. Mechanism for feasibility test 64: unresolved transport emissions creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1327. Feasibility test 65: assess construction emissions because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1328. Mechanism for feasibility test 65: unresolved construction emissions creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1329. Feasibility test 66: assess operating energy because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1330. Mechanism for feasibility test 66: unresolved operating energy creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1331. Feasibility test 67: assess tree retention because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1332. Mechanism for feasibility test 67: unresolved tree retention creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1333. Feasibility test 68: assess stormwater reuse because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1334. Mechanism for feasibility test 68: unresolved stormwater reuse creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1335. Feasibility test 69: assess capital escalation because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1336. Mechanism for feasibility test 69: unresolved capital escalation creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1337. Feasibility test 70: assess community equity because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1338. Mechanism for feasibility test 70: unresolved community equity creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1339. Feasibility test 71: assess private-land uptake because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1340. Mechanism for feasibility test 71: unresolved private-land uptake creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1341. Feasibility test 72: assess agricultural resilience because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1342. Mechanism for feasibility test 72: unresolved agricultural resilience creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1343. Feasibility test 73: assess industrial emissions because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1344. Mechanism for feasibility test 73: unresolved industrial emissions creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1345. Feasibility test 74: assess emergency-centre capacity because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1346. Mechanism for feasibility test 74: unresolved emergency-centre capacity creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1347. Feasibility test 75: assess public-realm comfort because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1348. Mechanism for feasibility test 75: unresolved public-realm comfort creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1349. Feasibility test 76: assess heat exposure because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1350. Mechanism for feasibility test 76: unresolved heat exposure creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1351. Feasibility test 77: assess flood exposure because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1352. Mechanism for feasibility test 77: unresolved flood exposure creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1353. Feasibility test 78: assess bushfire evacuation because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1354. Mechanism for feasibility test 78: unresolved bushfire evacuation creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1355. Feasibility test 79: assess transport emissions because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1356. Mechanism for feasibility test 79: unresolved transport emissions creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1357. Feasibility test 80: assess construction emissions because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1358. Mechanism for feasibility test 80: unresolved construction emissions creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1359. Feasibility test 81: assess operating energy because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1360. Mechanism for feasibility test 81: unresolved operating energy creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1361. Feasibility test 82: assess tree retention because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1362. Mechanism for feasibility test 82: unresolved tree retention creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1363. Feasibility test 83: assess stormwater reuse because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1364. Mechanism for feasibility test 83: unresolved stormwater reuse creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1365. Feasibility test 84: assess capital escalation because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1366. Mechanism for feasibility test 84: unresolved capital escalation creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1367. Feasibility test 85: assess community equity because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1368. Mechanism for feasibility test 85: unresolved community equity creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1369. Feasibility test 86: assess private-land uptake because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1370. Mechanism for feasibility test 86: unresolved private-land uptake creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1371. Feasibility test 87: assess agricultural resilience because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1372. Mechanism for feasibility test 87: unresolved agricultural resilience creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1373. Feasibility test 88: assess industrial emissions because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1374. Mechanism for feasibility test 88: unresolved industrial emissions creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1375. Feasibility test 89: assess emergency-centre capacity because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1376. Mechanism for feasibility test 89: unresolved emergency-centre capacity creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1377. Feasibility test 90: assess public-realm comfort because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1378. Mechanism for feasibility test 90: unresolved public-realm comfort creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1379. Feasibility test 91: assess heat exposure because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1380. Mechanism for feasibility test 91: unresolved heat exposure creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1381. Feasibility test 92: assess flood exposure because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1382. Mechanism for feasibility test 92: unresolved flood exposure creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1383. Feasibility test 93: assess bushfire evacuation because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1384. Mechanism for feasibility test 93: unresolved bushfire evacuation creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1385. Feasibility test 94: assess transport emissions because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1386. Mechanism for feasibility test 94: unresolved transport emissions creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1387. Feasibility test 95: assess construction emissions because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1388. Mechanism for feasibility test 95: unresolved construction emissions creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1389. Feasibility test 96: assess operating energy because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1390. Mechanism for feasibility test 96: unresolved operating energy creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1391. Feasibility test 97: assess tree retention because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1392. Mechanism for feasibility test 97: unresolved tree retention creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1393. Feasibility test 98: assess stormwater reuse because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1394. Mechanism for feasibility test 98: unresolved stormwater reuse creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1395. Feasibility test 99: assess capital escalation because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1396. Mechanism for feasibility test 99: unresolved capital escalation creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1397. Feasibility test 100: assess community equity because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1398. Mechanism for feasibility test 100: unresolved community equity creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1399. Feasibility test 101: assess private-land uptake because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1400. Mechanism for feasibility test 101: unresolved private-land uptake creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1401. Feasibility test 102: assess agricultural resilience because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1402. Mechanism for feasibility test 102: unresolved agricultural resilience creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1403. Feasibility test 103: assess industrial emissions because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1404. Mechanism for feasibility test 103: unresolved industrial emissions creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1405. Feasibility test 104: assess emergency-centre capacity because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1406. Mechanism for feasibility test 104: unresolved emergency-centre capacity creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1407. Feasibility test 105: assess public-realm comfort because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1408. Mechanism for feasibility test 105: unresolved public-realm comfort creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1409. Feasibility test 106: assess heat exposure because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1410. Mechanism for feasibility test 106: unresolved heat exposure creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1411. Feasibility test 107: assess flood exposure because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1412. Mechanism for feasibility test 107: unresolved flood exposure creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1413. Feasibility test 108: assess bushfire evacuation because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1414. Mechanism for feasibility test 108: unresolved bushfire evacuation creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1415. Feasibility test 109: assess transport emissions because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1416. Mechanism for feasibility test 109: unresolved transport emissions creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1417. Feasibility test 110: assess construction emissions because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1418. Mechanism for feasibility test 110: unresolved construction emissions creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1419. Feasibility test 111: assess operating energy because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1420. Mechanism for feasibility test 111: unresolved operating energy creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1421. Feasibility test 112: assess tree retention because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1422. Mechanism for feasibility test 112: unresolved tree retention creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1423. Feasibility test 113: assess stormwater reuse because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1424. Mechanism for feasibility test 113: unresolved stormwater reuse creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1425. Feasibility test 114: assess capital escalation because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1426. Mechanism for feasibility test 114: unresolved capital escalation creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1427. Feasibility test 115: assess community equity because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1428. Mechanism for feasibility test 115: unresolved community equity creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1429. Feasibility test 116: assess private-land uptake because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1430. Mechanism for feasibility test 116: unresolved private-land uptake creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1431. Feasibility test 117: assess agricultural resilience because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1432. Mechanism for feasibility test 117: unresolved agricultural resilience creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1433. Feasibility test 118: assess industrial emissions because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1434. Mechanism for feasibility test 118: unresolved industrial emissions creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1435. Feasibility test 119: assess emergency-centre capacity because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1436. Mechanism for feasibility test 119: unresolved emergency-centre capacity creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1437. Feasibility test 120: assess public-realm comfort because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1438. Mechanism for feasibility test 120: unresolved public-realm comfort creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1439. Feasibility test 121: assess heat exposure because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1440. Mechanism for feasibility test 121: unresolved heat exposure creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1441. Feasibility test 122: assess flood exposure because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1442. Mechanism for feasibility test 122: unresolved flood exposure creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1443. Feasibility test 123: assess bushfire evacuation because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1444. Mechanism for feasibility test 123: unresolved bushfire evacuation creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1445. Feasibility test 124: assess transport emissions because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1446. Mechanism for feasibility test 124: unresolved transport emissions creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1447. Feasibility test 125: assess construction emissions because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1448. Mechanism for feasibility test 125: unresolved construction emissions creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1449. Feasibility test 126: assess operating energy because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1450. Mechanism for feasibility test 126: unresolved operating energy creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1451. Feasibility test 127: assess tree retention because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1452. Mechanism for feasibility test 127: unresolved tree retention creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1453. Feasibility test 128: assess stormwater reuse because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1454. Mechanism for feasibility test 128: unresolved stormwater reuse creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1455. Feasibility test 129: assess capital escalation because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1456. Mechanism for feasibility test 129: unresolved capital escalation creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1457. Feasibility test 130: assess community equity because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1458. Mechanism for feasibility test 130: unresolved community equity creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1459. Feasibility test 131: assess private-land uptake because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1460. Mechanism for feasibility test 131: unresolved private-land uptake creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1461. Feasibility test 132: assess agricultural resilience because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1462. Mechanism for feasibility test 132: unresolved agricultural resilience creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1463. Feasibility test 133: assess industrial emissions because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1464. Mechanism for feasibility test 133: unresolved industrial emissions creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1465. Feasibility test 134: assess emergency-centre capacity because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1466. Mechanism for feasibility test 134: unresolved emergency-centre capacity creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1467. Feasibility test 135: assess public-realm comfort because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1468. Mechanism for feasibility test 135: unresolved public-realm comfort creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1469. Feasibility test 136: assess heat exposure because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1470. Mechanism for feasibility test 136: unresolved heat exposure creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1471. Feasibility test 137: assess flood exposure because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1472. Mechanism for feasibility test 137: unresolved flood exposure creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1473. Feasibility test 138: assess bushfire evacuation because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1474. Mechanism for feasibility test 138: unresolved bushfire evacuation creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1475. Feasibility test 139: assess transport emissions because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1476. Mechanism for feasibility test 139: unresolved transport emissions creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1477. Feasibility test 140: assess construction emissions because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1478. Mechanism for feasibility test 140: unresolved construction emissions creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1479. Feasibility test 141: assess operating energy because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1480. Mechanism for feasibility test 141: unresolved operating energy creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1481. Feasibility test 142: assess tree retention because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1482. Mechanism for feasibility test 142: unresolved tree retention creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1483. Feasibility test 143: assess stormwater reuse because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1484. Mechanism for feasibility test 143: unresolved stormwater reuse creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1485. Feasibility test 144: assess capital escalation because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1486. Mechanism for feasibility test 144: unresolved capital escalation creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1487. Feasibility test 145: assess community equity because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1488. Mechanism for feasibility test 145: unresolved community equity creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1489. Feasibility test 146: assess private-land uptake because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1490. Mechanism for feasibility test 146: unresolved private-land uptake creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1491. Feasibility test 147: assess agricultural resilience because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1492. Mechanism for feasibility test 147: unresolved agricultural resilience creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1493. Feasibility test 148: assess industrial emissions because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1494. Mechanism for feasibility test 148: unresolved industrial emissions creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1495. Feasibility test 149: assess emergency-centre capacity because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1496. Mechanism for feasibility test 149: unresolved emergency-centre capacity creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1497. Feasibility test 150: assess public-realm comfort because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1498. Mechanism for feasibility test 150: unresolved public-realm comfort creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1499. Feasibility test 151: assess heat exposure because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1500. Mechanism for feasibility test 151: unresolved heat exposure creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1501. Feasibility test 152: assess flood exposure because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1502. Mechanism for feasibility test 152: unresolved flood exposure creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1503. Feasibility test 153: assess bushfire evacuation because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1504. Mechanism for feasibility test 153: unresolved bushfire evacuation creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1505. Feasibility test 154: assess transport emissions because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1506. Mechanism for feasibility test 154: unresolved transport emissions creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1507. Feasibility test 155: assess construction emissions because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1508. Mechanism for feasibility test 155: unresolved construction emissions creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1509. Feasibility test 156: assess operating energy because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1510. Mechanism for feasibility test 156: unresolved operating energy creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1511. Feasibility test 157: assess tree retention because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1512. Mechanism for feasibility test 157: unresolved tree retention creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1513. Feasibility test 158: assess stormwater reuse because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1514. Mechanism for feasibility test 158: unresolved stormwater reuse creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1515. Feasibility test 159: assess capital escalation because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1516. Mechanism for feasibility test 159: unresolved capital escalation creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1517. Feasibility test 160: assess community equity because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1518. Mechanism for feasibility test 160: unresolved community equity creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1519. Feasibility test 161: assess private-land uptake because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1520. Mechanism for feasibility test 161: unresolved private-land uptake creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1521. Feasibility test 162: assess agricultural resilience because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1522. Mechanism for feasibility test 162: unresolved agricultural resilience creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1523. Feasibility test 163: assess industrial emissions because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1524. Mechanism for feasibility test 163: unresolved industrial emissions creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1525. Feasibility test 164: assess emergency-centre capacity because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1526. Mechanism for feasibility test 164: unresolved emergency-centre capacity creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1527. Feasibility test 165: assess public-realm comfort because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1528. Mechanism for feasibility test 165: unresolved public-realm comfort creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1529. Feasibility test 166: assess heat exposure because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1530. Mechanism for feasibility test 166: unresolved heat exposure creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1531. Feasibility test 167: assess flood exposure because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1532. Mechanism for feasibility test 167: unresolved flood exposure creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1533. Feasibility test 168: assess bushfire evacuation because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1534. Mechanism for feasibility test 168: unresolved bushfire evacuation creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1535. Feasibility test 169: assess transport emissions because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1536. Mechanism for feasibility test 169: unresolved transport emissions creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1537. Feasibility test 170: assess construction emissions because the CEAP converts climate risk and emissions reduction into measurable milestones, actions and asset responsibilities. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1538. Mechanism for feasibility test 170: unresolved construction emissions creates retrofit cost, residual emissions, service disruption, emergency burden, biodiversity loss, heat exposure, water stress or higher operating cost. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

Implementation Audit Checklist

1539. Audit question 1: confirm whether the 2025 land-management and biodiversity milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1540. Audit question 2: confirm whether the 2027 emergency, EV, outreach and repair milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1541. Audit question 3: confirm whether the 2030 community emissions, transport and critical-infrastructure milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1542. Audit question 4: confirm whether the 2035 Council all-emissions target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1543. Audit question 5: confirm whether the 2037 community interim target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1544. Audit question 6: confirm whether the 2043 community net-zero and canopy target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1545. Audit question 7: confirm whether the 2025 land-management and biodiversity milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1546. Audit question 8: confirm whether the 2027 emergency, EV, outreach and repair milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1547. Audit question 9: confirm whether the 2030 community emissions, transport and critical-infrastructure milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1548. Audit question 10: confirm whether the 2035 Council all-emissions target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1549. Audit question 11: confirm whether the 2037 community interim target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1550. Audit question 12: confirm whether the 2043 community net-zero and canopy target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1551. Audit question 13: confirm whether the 2025 land-management and biodiversity milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1552. Audit question 14: confirm whether the 2027 emergency, EV, outreach and repair milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1553. Audit question 15: confirm whether the 2030 community emissions, transport and critical-infrastructure milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1554. Audit question 16: confirm whether the 2035 Council all-emissions target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1555. Audit question 17: confirm whether the 2037 community interim target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1556. Audit question 18: confirm whether the 2043 community net-zero and canopy target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1557. Audit question 19: confirm whether the 2025 land-management and biodiversity milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1558. Audit question 20: confirm whether the 2027 emergency, EV, outreach and repair milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1559. Audit question 21: confirm whether the 2030 community emissions, transport and critical-infrastructure milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1560. Audit question 22: confirm whether the 2035 Council all-emissions target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1561. Audit question 23: confirm whether the 2037 community interim target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1562. Audit question 24: confirm whether the 2043 community net-zero and canopy target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1563. Audit question 25: confirm whether the 2025 land-management and biodiversity milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1564. Audit question 26: confirm whether the 2027 emergency, EV, outreach and repair milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1565. Audit question 27: confirm whether the 2030 community emissions, transport and critical-infrastructure milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1566. Audit question 28: confirm whether the 2035 Council all-emissions target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1567. Audit question 29: confirm whether the 2037 community interim target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1568. Audit question 30: confirm whether the 2043 community net-zero and canopy target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1569. Audit question 31: confirm whether the 2025 land-management and biodiversity milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1570. Audit question 32: confirm whether the 2027 emergency, EV, outreach and repair milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1571. Audit question 33: confirm whether the 2030 community emissions, transport and critical-infrastructure milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1572. Audit question 34: confirm whether the 2035 Council all-emissions target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1573. Audit question 35: confirm whether the 2037 community interim target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1574. Audit question 36: confirm whether the 2043 community net-zero and canopy target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1575. Audit question 37: confirm whether the 2025 land-management and biodiversity milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1576. Audit question 38: confirm whether the 2027 emergency, EV, outreach and repair milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1577. Audit question 39: confirm whether the 2030 community emissions, transport and critical-infrastructure milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1578. Audit question 40: confirm whether the 2035 Council all-emissions target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1579. Audit question 41: confirm whether the 2037 community interim target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1580. Audit question 42: confirm whether the 2043 community net-zero and canopy target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1581. Audit question 43: confirm whether the 2025 land-management and biodiversity milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1582. Audit question 44: confirm whether the 2027 emergency, EV, outreach and repair milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1583. Audit question 45: confirm whether the 2030 community emissions, transport and critical-infrastructure milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1584. Audit question 46: confirm whether the 2035 Council all-emissions target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1585. Audit question 47: confirm whether the 2037 community interim target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1586. Audit question 48: confirm whether the 2043 community net-zero and canopy target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1587. Audit question 49: confirm whether the 2025 land-management and biodiversity milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1588. Audit question 50: confirm whether the 2027 emergency, EV, outreach and repair milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1589. Audit question 51: confirm whether the 2030 community emissions, transport and critical-infrastructure milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1590. Audit question 52: confirm whether the 2035 Council all-emissions target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1591. Audit question 53: confirm whether the 2037 community interim target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1592. Audit question 54: confirm whether the 2043 community net-zero and canopy target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1593. Audit question 55: confirm whether the 2025 land-management and biodiversity milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1594. Audit question 56: confirm whether the 2027 emergency, EV, outreach and repair milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1595. Audit question 57: confirm whether the 2030 community emissions, transport and critical-infrastructure milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1596. Audit question 58: confirm whether the 2035 Council all-emissions target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1597. Audit question 59: confirm whether the 2037 community interim target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1598. Audit question 60: confirm whether the 2043 community net-zero and canopy target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1599. Audit question 61: confirm whether the 2025 land-management and biodiversity milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1600. Audit question 62: confirm whether the 2027 emergency, EV, outreach and repair milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1601. Audit question 63: confirm whether the 2030 community emissions, transport and critical-infrastructure milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1602. Audit question 64: confirm whether the 2035 Council all-emissions target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1603. Audit question 65: confirm whether the 2037 community interim target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1604. Audit question 66: confirm whether the 2043 community net-zero and canopy target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1605. Audit question 67: confirm whether the 2025 land-management and biodiversity milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1606. Audit question 68: confirm whether the 2027 emergency, EV, outreach and repair milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1607. Audit question 69: confirm whether the 2030 community emissions, transport and critical-infrastructure milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1608. Audit question 70: confirm whether the 2035 Council all-emissions target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1609. Audit question 71: confirm whether the 2037 community interim target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1610. Audit question 72: confirm whether the 2043 community net-zero and canopy target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1611. Audit question 73: confirm whether the 2025 land-management and biodiversity milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1612. Audit question 74: confirm whether the 2027 emergency, EV, outreach and repair milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1613. Audit question 75: confirm whether the 2030 community emissions, transport and critical-infrastructure milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1614. Audit question 76: confirm whether the 2035 Council all-emissions target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1615. Audit question 77: confirm whether the 2037 community interim target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1616. Audit question 78: confirm whether the 2043 community net-zero and canopy target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1617. Audit question 79: confirm whether the 2025 land-management and biodiversity milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1618. Audit question 80: confirm whether the 2027 emergency, EV, outreach and repair milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1619. Audit question 81: confirm whether the 2030 community emissions, transport and critical-infrastructure milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1620. Audit question 82: confirm whether the 2035 Council all-emissions target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1621. Audit question 83: confirm whether the 2037 community interim target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1622. Audit question 84: confirm whether the 2043 community net-zero and canopy target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1623. Audit question 85: confirm whether the 2025 land-management and biodiversity milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1624. Audit question 86: confirm whether the 2027 emergency, EV, outreach and repair milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1625. Audit question 87: confirm whether the 2030 community emissions, transport and critical-infrastructure milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1626. Audit question 88: confirm whether the 2035 Council all-emissions target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1627. Audit question 89: confirm whether the 2037 community interim target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1628. Audit question 90: confirm whether the 2043 community net-zero and canopy target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1629. Audit question 91: confirm whether the 2025 land-management and biodiversity milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1630. Audit question 92: confirm whether the 2027 emergency, EV, outreach and repair milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1631. Audit question 93: confirm whether the 2030 community emissions, transport and critical-infrastructure milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1632. Audit question 94: confirm whether the 2035 Council all-emissions target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1633. Audit question 95: confirm whether the 2037 community interim target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1634. Audit question 96: confirm whether the 2043 community net-zero and canopy target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1635. Audit question 97: confirm whether the 2025 land-management and biodiversity milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1636. Audit question 98: confirm whether the 2027 emergency, EV, outreach and repair milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1637. Audit question 99: confirm whether the 2030 community emissions, transport and critical-infrastructure milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1638. Audit question 100: confirm whether the 2035 Council all-emissions target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1639. Audit question 101: confirm whether the 2037 community interim target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1640. Audit question 102: confirm whether the 2043 community net-zero and canopy target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1641. Audit question 103: confirm whether the 2025 land-management and biodiversity milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1642. Audit question 104: confirm whether the 2027 emergency, EV, outreach and repair milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1643. Audit question 105: confirm whether the 2030 community emissions, transport and critical-infrastructure milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1644. Audit question 106: confirm whether the 2035 Council all-emissions target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1645. Audit question 107: confirm whether the 2037 community interim target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1646. Audit question 108: confirm whether the 2043 community net-zero and canopy target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1647. Audit question 109: confirm whether the 2025 land-management and biodiversity milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1648. Audit question 110: confirm whether the 2027 emergency, EV, outreach and repair milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1649. Audit question 111: confirm whether the 2030 community emissions, transport and critical-infrastructure milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1650. Audit question 112: confirm whether the 2035 Council all-emissions target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1651. Audit question 113: confirm whether the 2037 community interim target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1652. Audit question 114: confirm whether the 2043 community net-zero and canopy target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1653. Audit question 115: confirm whether the 2025 land-management and biodiversity milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1654. Audit question 116: confirm whether the 2027 emergency, EV, outreach and repair milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1655. Audit question 117: confirm whether the 2030 community emissions, transport and critical-infrastructure milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1656. Audit question 118: confirm whether the 2035 Council all-emissions target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1657. Audit question 119: confirm whether the 2037 community interim target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1658. Audit question 120: confirm whether the 2043 community net-zero and canopy target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1659. Audit question 121: confirm whether the 2025 land-management and biodiversity milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1660. Audit question 122: confirm whether the 2027 emergency, EV, outreach and repair milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1661. Audit question 123: confirm whether the 2030 community emissions, transport and critical-infrastructure milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1662. Audit question 124: confirm whether the 2035 Council all-emissions target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1663. Audit question 125: confirm whether the 2037 community interim target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1664. Audit question 126: confirm whether the 2043 community net-zero and canopy target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1665. Audit question 127: confirm whether the 2025 land-management and biodiversity milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1666. Audit question 128: confirm whether the 2027 emergency, EV, outreach and repair milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1667. Audit question 129: confirm whether the 2030 community emissions, transport and critical-infrastructure milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1668. Audit question 130: confirm whether the 2035 Council all-emissions target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1669. Audit question 131: confirm whether the 2037 community interim target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1670. Audit question 132: confirm whether the 2043 community net-zero and canopy target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1671. Audit question 133: confirm whether the 2025 land-management and biodiversity milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1672. Audit question 134: confirm whether the 2027 emergency, EV, outreach and repair milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1673. Audit question 135: confirm whether the 2030 community emissions, transport and critical-infrastructure milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1674. Audit question 136: confirm whether the 2035 Council all-emissions target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1675. Audit question 137: confirm whether the 2037 community interim target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1676. Audit question 138: confirm whether the 2043 community net-zero and canopy target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1677. Audit question 139: confirm whether the 2025 land-management and biodiversity milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1678. Audit question 140: confirm whether the 2027 emergency, EV, outreach and repair milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1679. Audit question 141: confirm whether the 2030 community emissions, transport and critical-infrastructure milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1680. Audit question 142: confirm whether the 2035 Council all-emissions target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1681. Audit question 143: confirm whether the 2037 community interim target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1682. Audit question 144: confirm whether the 2043 community net-zero and canopy target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1683. Audit question 145: confirm whether the 2025 land-management and biodiversity milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1684. Audit question 146: confirm whether the 2027 emergency, EV, outreach and repair milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1685. Audit question 147: confirm whether the 2030 community emissions, transport and critical-infrastructure milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1686. Audit question 148: confirm whether the 2035 Council all-emissions target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1687. Audit question 149: confirm whether the 2037 community interim target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1688. Audit question 150: confirm whether the 2043 community net-zero and canopy target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1689. Audit question 151: confirm whether the 2025 land-management and biodiversity milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1690. Audit question 152: confirm whether the 2027 emergency, EV, outreach and repair milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1691. Audit question 153: confirm whether the 2030 community emissions, transport and critical-infrastructure milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1692. Audit question 154: confirm whether the 2035 Council all-emissions target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1693. Audit question 155: confirm whether the 2037 community interim target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1694. Audit question 156: confirm whether the 2043 community net-zero and canopy target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1695. Audit question 157: confirm whether the 2025 land-management and biodiversity milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1696. Audit question 158: confirm whether the 2027 emergency, EV, outreach and repair milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1697. Audit question 159: confirm whether the 2030 community emissions, transport and critical-infrastructure milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1698. Audit question 160: confirm whether the 2035 Council all-emissions target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1699. Audit question 161: confirm whether the 2037 community interim target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1700. Audit question 162: confirm whether the 2043 community net-zero and canopy target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1701. Audit question 163: confirm whether the 2025 land-management and biodiversity milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1702. Audit question 164: confirm whether the 2027 emergency, EV, outreach and repair milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1703. Audit question 165: confirm whether the 2030 community emissions, transport and critical-infrastructure milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1704. Audit question 166: confirm whether the 2035 Council all-emissions target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1705. Audit question 167: confirm whether the 2037 community interim target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1706. Audit question 168: confirm whether the 2043 community net-zero and canopy target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1707. Audit question 169: confirm whether the 2025 land-management and biodiversity milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1708. Audit question 170: confirm whether the 2027 emergency, EV, outreach and repair milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1709. Audit question 171: confirm whether the 2030 community emissions, transport and critical-infrastructure milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1710. Audit question 172: confirm whether the 2035 Council all-emissions target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1711. Audit question 173: confirm whether the 2037 community interim target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1712. Audit question 174: confirm whether the 2043 community net-zero and canopy target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1713. Audit question 175: confirm whether the 2025 land-management and biodiversity milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1714. Audit question 176: confirm whether the 2027 emergency, EV, outreach and repair milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1715. Audit question 177: confirm whether the 2030 community emissions, transport and critical-infrastructure milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1716. Audit question 178: confirm whether the 2035 Council all-emissions target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1717. Audit question 179: confirm whether the 2037 community interim target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1718. Audit question 180: confirm whether the 2043 community net-zero and canopy target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1719. Audit question 181: confirm whether the 2025 land-management and biodiversity milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1720. Audit question 182: confirm whether the 2027 emergency, EV, outreach and repair milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1721. Audit question 183: confirm whether the 2030 community emissions, transport and critical-infrastructure milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1722. Audit question 184: confirm whether the 2035 Council all-emissions target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1723. Audit question 185: confirm whether the 2037 community interim target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1724. Audit question 186: confirm whether the 2043 community net-zero and canopy target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1725. Audit question 187: confirm whether the 2025 land-management and biodiversity milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1726. Audit question 188: confirm whether the 2027 emergency, EV, outreach and repair milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1727. Audit question 189: confirm whether the 2030 community emissions, transport and critical-infrastructure milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1728. Audit question 190: confirm whether the 2035 Council all-emissions target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1729. Audit question 191: confirm whether the 2037 community interim target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1730. Audit question 192: confirm whether the 2043 community net-zero and canopy target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1731. Audit question 193: confirm whether the 2025 land-management and biodiversity milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1732. Audit question 194: confirm whether the 2027 emergency, EV, outreach and repair milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1733. Audit question 195: confirm whether the 2030 community emissions, transport and critical-infrastructure milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1734. Audit question 196: confirm whether the 2035 Council all-emissions target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1735. Audit question 197: confirm whether the 2037 community interim target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1736. Audit question 198: confirm whether the 2043 community net-zero and canopy target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1737. Audit question 199: confirm whether the 2025 land-management and biodiversity milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1738. Audit question 200: confirm whether the 2027 emergency, EV, outreach and repair milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1739. Audit question 201: confirm whether the 2030 community emissions, transport and critical-infrastructure milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1740. Audit question 202: confirm whether the 2035 Council all-emissions target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1741. Audit question 203: confirm whether the 2037 community interim target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1742. Audit question 204: confirm whether the 2043 community net-zero and canopy target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1743. Audit question 205: confirm whether the 2025 land-management and biodiversity milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1744. Audit question 206: confirm whether the 2027 emergency, EV, outreach and repair milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1745. Audit question 207: confirm whether the 2030 community emissions, transport and critical-infrastructure milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1746. Audit question 208: confirm whether the 2035 Council all-emissions target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1747. Audit question 209: confirm whether the 2037 community interim target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1748. Audit question 210: confirm whether the 2043 community net-zero and canopy target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1749. Audit question 211: confirm whether the 2025 land-management and biodiversity milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1750. Audit question 212: confirm whether the 2027 emergency, EV, outreach and repair milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1751. Audit question 213: confirm whether the 2030 community emissions, transport and critical-infrastructure milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1752. Audit question 214: confirm whether the 2035 Council all-emissions target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1753. Audit question 215: confirm whether the 2037 community interim target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1754. Audit question 216: confirm whether the 2043 community net-zero and canopy target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1755. Audit question 217: confirm whether the 2025 land-management and biodiversity milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1756. Audit question 218: confirm whether the 2027 emergency, EV, outreach and repair milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1757. Audit question 219: confirm whether the 2030 community emissions, transport and critical-infrastructure milestones has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1758. Audit question 220: confirm whether the 2035 Council all-emissions target has a responsible officer, adopted budget, delivery status, metric baseline, risk-register link and public reporting pathway. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

Synthesis

1759. The CEAP is strongest where it quantifies abatement, cost and savings, such as LEDs, solar PV, fleet transition and FOGO. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1760. The CEAP is less verifiable where actions are not modelled, such as sustainable procurement, fossil-fuel-free investment policy and embedding climate response in future plans. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1761. Adaptation actions are measured by output milestones rather than emissions tonnes, such as emergency-plan updates, 80% infrastructure assessment, EV chargers in every town and an Integrated Transport Strategy. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1762. Beveridge Central operationalises the CEAP through shade, WSUD, rainwater harvesting, active paths, ESD facilities, tree planting and wetlands. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1763. Beveridge Central also shows tradeoff pressure among sports geometry, synthetic surfaces, road widening, basalt excavation, parking, tree retention and cost escalation. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1764. The practical test for Mitchell Shire is whether every growth-area plan can trace climate risk to design element, cost plan and staging milestone. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1765. A development increasing heat, car dependence, flood exposure, fossil-gas reliance, canopy loss or emergency-service load is misaligned unless it provides quantified mitigation. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1766. A development delivering canopy, WSUD, active transport, all-electric buildings, renewable energy, flood resilience and lifecycle carbon control is aligned only if those features are funded and protected from value management. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1767. The page should be updated after the 2026 CEAP review. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1768. The page should be updated when implementation reports confirm whether 2025, 2027 and 2030 indicators were achieved. (Source: msc-climate-emergency-action-plan-web-2024-02-07.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)