Mitchell Shire Urban Forest Strategy 2023

Mitchell Shire | Environment and Open Space | Urban Forest | Climate Adaptation | Beveridge | Wallan | Seymour | Broadford | Kilmore

Note: /c/pi/schema/CLAUDE.md was requested but was not present under C:\pi; this page follows the prompt standard directly: quantified claims, mechanisms, staging, contested issues, feasibility implications, wikilinks, and per-fact source tags.

Executive Thesis

  • Urban forest delivery in Mitchell Shire is a growth-management problem because canopy protection, private-lot design, public-realm planting, open-space embellishment, carpark shade and asset renewal all compete for land, budget and maintenance capacity (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • The 2023 baseline is 12% average township canopy, while the strategy targets 20% by 2043 and 30% by 2073 (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • The strategy identifies road-reserve canopy at 11% and open-space canopy at 7%, with 2073 targets of 20% and 30% respectively (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Council manages about 56,000 public trees, including about 41,000 street trees and more than 15,000 park trees (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • The mapped vacant street-tree backlog is about 12,000 sites, with a detailed table total of 11,747 sites (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • The current 600-tree annual planting rate would take about 95 years to fill vacant sites, so the strategy requires nearly 2,000 annual street trees (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • The implementation mechanism is not just more trees; it is a sequence of planting expansion, tree renewal, planning controls, private incentives, development guidelines, tree data and canopy remeasurement (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Private land is decisive because 70% of township land is privately owned and 75% of the urban forest is on private land (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • The public urban forest is valued at 140 million, with annual quantified benefits of about 81,000 across pollution removal, carbon sequestration and avoided runoff (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • If canopy targets are reached, the public urban forest could be worth about $224 million (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • The action plan says implementation costs 12.390 million over 10 years, while the timeframe table totals 11.890 million, leaving a $500,000 reconciliation gap (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban heat evidence is operationally specific: Seymour IGA exposed concrete was 50 degrees Celsius and tree-shaded concrete was 24 degrees Celsius (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Broadford Primary School carpark hardstand reached up to 52 degrees Celsius, while a tree-cooled bay was 35 degrees Celsius and grass verge was 21 degrees Celsius (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Beveridge is the sharpest growth-area test because its canopy baseline is 3% and its population is forecast to exceed 112,000 by 2046 (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Wallan is the largest vacant-site backlog with 3,935 vacant street-tree sites and 9% canopy (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Seymour has 2,709 vacant sites and documented heat hot spots (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Kilmore has 2,222 vacant sites and 12% canopy, so it sits exactly at the township average but still below the benchmark canopy range (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Tallarook has the highest recorded canopy at 24%, which is still below the 30% lower benchmark cited for urban cooling and stormwater performance (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • The strategy uses a one canopy tree per five car spaces standard for new carparks and upgrades (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • The Beveridge Central Active Open Space Master Plan comes close to the carpark-tree standard but is constrained where tree planting would conflict with synthetic soccer pitch maintenance and surface protection (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Development feasibility now depends on early design choices: verge width, crossover placement, underground services, soil volume, tree protection zones, sports-field layout, carpark geometry and WSUD cannot be solved after construction (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • The strategy should be read with Open Space Strategy, Climate Emergency Action Plan, Environment Strategy 2014-2024, Council Plan 2021-2025, Mitchell 2050 Community Vision and Beveridge Central Active Open Space Master Plan (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

Quantified Baseline And Mechanisms

Scope

  • Quantified claim: all trees and shrubs within urban boundaries of established and growing settlements, across public and private realms (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Mechanism: This scope makes public roads, parks, schools, private lots, industrial land, commercial carparks and new subdivisions part of one canopy system (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Development-feasibility implication: this factor should be resolved before planning approval, capital procurement or construction locks in physical constraints (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

Time horizon

  • Quantified claim: 10, 20 and 50 years (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Mechanism: The 10-year action plan must produce enough early planting and protection to make the 2043 and 2073 canopy targets plausible (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Development-feasibility implication: this factor should be resolved before planning approval, capital procurement or construction locks in physical constraints (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

Review cycle

  • Quantified claim: every four years (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Mechanism: A four-year review cycle allows course correction before long-term canopy lag becomes irreversible (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Development-feasibility implication: this factor should be resolved before planning approval, capital procurement or construction locks in physical constraints (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

Township canopy baseline

  • Quantified claim: 12% (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Mechanism: This is far below the cited optimal 30%-40% canopy range for cooling and stormwater effects (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Development-feasibility implication: this factor should be resolved before planning approval, capital procurement or construction locks in physical constraints (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

Township canopy targets

  • Quantified claim: 20% by 2043 and 30% by 2073 (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Mechanism: The 2043 target is an interim climb; the 2073 target reaches the lower benchmark threshold (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Development-feasibility implication: this factor should be resolved before planning approval, capital procurement or construction locks in physical constraints (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

Road reserve canopy

  • Quantified claim: 11% to 20% by 2073 (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Mechanism: Road cross-sections, nature strips, crossovers and service placement must allow almost doubled road canopy (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Development-feasibility implication: this factor should be resolved before planning approval, capital procurement or construction locks in physical constraints (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

Open space canopy

  • Quantified claim: 7% to 30% by 2073 (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Mechanism: Sports reserves and parks need canopy as functional infrastructure, not residual landscaping (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Development-feasibility implication: this factor should be resolved before planning approval, capital procurement or construction locks in physical constraints (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

Vacant sites

  • Quantified claim: 11,747 detailed vacant street-tree sites (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Mechanism: The backlog is measurable, township-specific and therefore governable through annual planting programs (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Development-feasibility implication: this factor should be resolved before planning approval, capital procurement or construction locks in physical constraints (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

Planting rate

  • Quantified claim: 600 current trees annually versus nearly 2,000 required annually (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Mechanism: The program must expand by more than three times to fill vacant sites in the desired timeframe (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Development-feasibility implication: this factor should be resolved before planning approval, capital procurement or construction locks in physical constraints (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

Replacement load

  • Quantified claim: 500-600 replacement trees annually (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Mechanism: A large share of planting only maintains the existing stock and does not increase canopy (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Development-feasibility implication: this factor should be resolved before planning approval, capital procurement or construction locks in physical constraints (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

Additional load

  • Quantified claim: about 1,200 additional trees annually (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Mechanism: This is the backlog-reduction component (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Development-feasibility implication: this factor should be resolved before planning approval, capital procurement or construction locks in physical constraints (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

Public trees

  • Quantified claim: about 41,000 street trees and over 15,000 park trees (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Mechanism: Asset systems must manage inspections, watering, risk, removals, replacements and handover data (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Development-feasibility implication: this factor should be resolved before planning approval, capital procurement or construction locks in physical constraints (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

Private land

  • Quantified claim: 70% of township land and 75% of urban forest (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Mechanism: The private realm determines whether public planting produces net canopy gain or merely offsets losses (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Development-feasibility implication: this factor should be resolved before planning approval, capital procurement or construction locks in physical constraints (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

Public asset value

  • Quantified claim: $140 million (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Mechanism: Tree protection should be treated as asset protection with replacement and amenity consequences (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Development-feasibility implication: this factor should be resolved before planning approval, capital procurement or construction locks in physical constraints (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

Future asset value

  • Quantified claim: $224 million if targets are achieved (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Mechanism: Canopy target achievement has a quantified capital-value implication (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Development-feasibility implication: this factor should be resolved before planning approval, capital procurement or construction locks in physical constraints (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

Annual benefits

  • Quantified claim: $81,000 per year (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Mechanism: Pollution removal, carbon sequestration and avoided stormwater are quantified services (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Development-feasibility implication: this factor should be resolved before planning approval, capital procurement or construction locks in physical constraints (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

Stormwater

  • Quantified claim: 15,000 cubic metres avoided runoff per year (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Mechanism: Canopy has drainage-value implications for urban design and capital works (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Development-feasibility implication: this factor should be resolved before planning approval, capital procurement or construction locks in physical constraints (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

Pollution

  • Quantified claim: 13.3 metric tonnes removed per year (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Mechanism: Leaf area is an air-quality service, not just amenity (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Development-feasibility implication: this factor should be resolved before planning approval, capital procurement or construction locks in physical constraints (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

Carbon

  • Quantified claim: 713 metric tonnes sequestered annually and 26 metric tonnes stored as reported (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Mechanism: The carbon method should be checked because the reported annual and stored quantities are counterintuitive when compared (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Development-feasibility implication: this factor should be resolved before planning approval, capital procurement or construction locks in physical constraints (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

Heat

  • Quantified claim: 50 degrees exposed concrete and 24 degrees tree-shaded concrete at Seymour IGA (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Mechanism: A single mature shade condition produced a 26-degree surface-temperature difference (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Development-feasibility implication: this factor should be resolved before planning approval, capital procurement or construction locks in physical constraints (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

Heat

  • Quantified claim: 52 degrees hardstand, 35 degrees tree-cooled bay and 21 degrees grass verge at Broadford Primary School (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Mechanism: Surface material and canopy both govern heat load (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Development-feasibility implication: this factor should be resolved before planning approval, capital procurement or construction locks in physical constraints (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

Carparks

  • Quantified claim: one canopy tree per five car spaces (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Mechanism: Carpark shade is a design standard that changes layout, soil-volume and WSUD requirements (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Development-feasibility implication: this factor should be resolved before planning approval, capital procurement or construction locks in physical constraints (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

Monitoring

  • Quantified claim: canopy and urban heat remeasured every three years (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Mechanism: Canopy targets require independent measurement rather than relying on planting counts alone (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Development-feasibility implication: this factor should be resolved before planning approval, capital procurement or construction locks in physical constraints (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

Action plan cost

  • Quantified claim: 12.390 million stated and 11.890 million table total (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Mechanism: Budget governance should reconcile this discrepancy before using the figure for capital planning (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Development-feasibility implication: this factor should be resolved before planning approval, capital procurement or construction locks in physical constraints (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

Township Evidence

Tallarook

  • Canopy and backlog: 24% canopy; 83 vacant street-tree sites (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Interpretation: highest recorded canopy; still below the 30% lower benchmark (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Mechanism: priority planting should combine low canopy, heat vulnerability, social vulnerability, vacant sites, pedestrian activity and biodiversity proximity (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Feasibility implication: new development should secure plantable soil, canopy envelopes, services and crossovers before lot, road, open-space or carpark layouts are fixed (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Wikilink: analyse this settlement with Tallarook, Mitchell Shire, Open Space Strategy and Climate Emergency Action Plan (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

Kilmore East

  • Canopy and backlog: 19% canopy; not separately listed in vacant-site table (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Interpretation: high canopy relative to the shire average (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Mechanism: priority planting should combine low canopy, heat vulnerability, social vulnerability, vacant sites, pedestrian activity and biodiversity proximity (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Feasibility implication: new development should secure plantable soil, canopy envelopes, services and crossovers before lot, road, open-space or carpark layouts are fixed (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Wikilink: analyse this settlement with Kilmore East, Mitchell Shire, Open Space Strategy and Climate Emergency Action Plan (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

Wandong/Heathcote Junction

  • Canopy and backlog: 17% canopy; 873 vacant street-tree sites (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Interpretation: above-average canopy with a substantial backlog (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Mechanism: priority planting should combine low canopy, heat vulnerability, social vulnerability, vacant sites, pedestrian activity and biodiversity proximity (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Feasibility implication: new development should secure plantable soil, canopy envelopes, services and crossovers before lot, road, open-space or carpark layouts are fixed (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Wikilink: analyse this settlement with Heathcote Junction, Mitchell Shire, Open Space Strategy and Climate Emergency Action Plan (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

Broadford

  • Canopy and backlog: 15% canopy; 1,210 vacant street-tree sites (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Interpretation: above-average canopy but below benchmark; school carpark heat evidence is material (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Mechanism: priority planting should combine low canopy, heat vulnerability, social vulnerability, vacant sites, pedestrian activity and biodiversity proximity (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Feasibility implication: new development should secure plantable soil, canopy envelopes, services and crossovers before lot, road, open-space or carpark layouts are fixed (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Wikilink: analyse this settlement with Broadford, Mitchell Shire, Open Space Strategy and Climate Emergency Action Plan (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

Seymour

  • Canopy and backlog: 14% canopy; 2,709 vacant street-tree sites (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Interpretation: large backlog and documented urban heat hot spots (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Mechanism: priority planting should combine low canopy, heat vulnerability, social vulnerability, vacant sites, pedestrian activity and biodiversity proximity (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Feasibility implication: new development should secure plantable soil, canopy envelopes, services and crossovers before lot, road, open-space or carpark layouts are fixed (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Wikilink: analyse this settlement with Seymour, Mitchell Shire, Open Space Strategy and Climate Emergency Action Plan (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

Waterford Park

  • Canopy and backlog: 14% canopy; not separately listed in vacant-site table (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Interpretation: above-average canopy with unclear operational vacant-site denominator (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Mechanism: priority planting should combine low canopy, heat vulnerability, social vulnerability, vacant sites, pedestrian activity and biodiversity proximity (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Feasibility implication: new development should secure plantable soil, canopy envelopes, services and crossovers before lot, road, open-space or carpark layouts are fixed (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Wikilink: analyse this settlement with Waterford Park, Mitchell Shire, Open Space Strategy and Climate Emergency Action Plan (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

Tooborac

  • Canopy and backlog: 13% canopy; 60 vacant street-tree sites (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Interpretation: small backlog and near-average canopy (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Mechanism: priority planting should combine low canopy, heat vulnerability, social vulnerability, vacant sites, pedestrian activity and biodiversity proximity (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Feasibility implication: new development should secure plantable soil, canopy envelopes, services and crossovers before lot, road, open-space or carpark layouts are fixed (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Wikilink: analyse this settlement with Tooborac, Mitchell Shire, Open Space Strategy and Climate Emergency Action Plan (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

Kilmore

  • Canopy and backlog: 12% canopy; 2,222 vacant street-tree sites (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Interpretation: at shire average but below benchmark (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Mechanism: priority planting should combine low canopy, heat vulnerability, social vulnerability, vacant sites, pedestrian activity and biodiversity proximity (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Feasibility implication: new development should secure plantable soil, canopy envelopes, services and crossovers before lot, road, open-space or carpark layouts are fixed (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Wikilink: analyse this settlement with Kilmore, Mitchell Shire, Open Space Strategy and Climate Emergency Action Plan (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

Pyalong

  • Canopy and backlog: 12% canopy; 470 vacant street-tree sites (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Interpretation: at shire average with moderate backlog (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Mechanism: priority planting should combine low canopy, heat vulnerability, social vulnerability, vacant sites, pedestrian activity and biodiversity proximity (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Feasibility implication: new development should secure plantable soil, canopy envelopes, services and crossovers before lot, road, open-space or carpark layouts are fixed (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Wikilink: analyse this settlement with Pyalong, Mitchell Shire, Open Space Strategy and Climate Emergency Action Plan (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

Wallan

  • Canopy and backlog: 9% canopy; 3,935 vacant street-tree sites (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Interpretation: largest vacant-site backlog and low growth-area canopy (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Mechanism: priority planting should combine low canopy, heat vulnerability, social vulnerability, vacant sites, pedestrian activity and biodiversity proximity (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Feasibility implication: new development should secure plantable soil, canopy envelopes, services and crossovers before lot, road, open-space or carpark layouts are fixed (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Wikilink: analyse this settlement with Wallan, Mitchell Shire, Open Space Strategy and Climate Emergency Action Plan (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

Beveridge

  • Canopy and backlog: 3% canopy; 185 vacant street-tree sites (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Interpretation: lowest canopy and major growth-area exposure (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Mechanism: priority planting should combine low canopy, heat vulnerability, social vulnerability, vacant sites, pedestrian activity and biodiversity proximity (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Feasibility implication: new development should secure plantable soil, canopy envelopes, services and crossovers before lot, road, open-space or carpark layouts are fixed (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Wikilink: analyse this settlement with Beveridge, Mitchell Shire, Open Space Strategy and Climate Emergency Action Plan (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

Beveridge Central Active Open Space Interface

  • Beveridge Central Active Open Space Master Plan study report is dated May 2025 (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • Urban-forest implication: the active-open-space design must reconcile sport function, tree retention, heat mitigation, carpark shade, earthworks, cost and long-term open-space canopy targets (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • Beveridge had an estimated 2024 population of 9,120 people (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • Urban-forest implication: the active-open-space design must reconcile sport function, tree retention, heat mitigation, carpark shade, earthworks, cost and long-term open-space canopy targets (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • Beveridge is forecast to exceed 112,000 people by 2046 and become Mitchell Shire’s largest population centre (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • Urban-forest implication: the active-open-space design must reconcile sport function, tree retention, heat mitigation, carpark shade, earthworks, cost and long-term open-space canopy targets (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • Beveridge grew from 4,243 people in 2021 and is forecast to reach 112,187 in 2046, described as 2,545% growth over 25 years (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • Urban-forest implication: the active-open-space design must reconcile sport function, tree retention, heat mitigation, carpark shade, earthworks, cost and long-term open-space canopy targets (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • Beveridge currently has no sports fields (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • Urban-forest implication: the active-open-space design must reconcile sport function, tree retention, heat mitigation, carpark shade, earthworks, cost and long-term open-space canopy targets (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • Existing public sporting facilities are two tennis courts with a netball overlay at Beveridge Recreation Reserve and an 18-hole golf course in Mandalay Estate (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • Urban-forest implication: the active-open-space design must reconcile sport function, tree retention, heat mitigation, carpark shade, earthworks, cost and long-term open-space canopy targets (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • The Beveridge Central PSP identifies a 6.79 hectare active open space site (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • Urban-forest implication: the active-open-space design must reconcile sport function, tree retention, heat mitigation, carpark shade, earthworks, cost and long-term open-space canopy targets (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • The Patterson Road and Lithgow Street road/intersection requirement removes 0.32 hectares, leaving 6.47 hectares developable for sport and recreation (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • Urban-forest implication: the active-open-space design must reconcile sport function, tree retention, heat mitigation, carpark shade, earthworks, cost and long-term open-space canopy targets (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • The site falls 6.4 metres from northwest to southeast, with an average grade of 1:60 (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • Urban-forest implication: the active-open-space design must reconcile sport function, tree retention, heat mitigation, carpark shade, earthworks, cost and long-term open-space canopy targets (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • Shallow basalt bedrock is predominantly within the top half metre in the western section and reaches about 2 metres depth in the southwest corner (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • Urban-forest implication: the active-open-space design must reconcile sport function, tree retention, heat mitigation, carpark shade, earthworks, cost and long-term open-space canopy targets (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • Shallow bedrock can slow excavation and increase costs, so it influenced master plan layout (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • Urban-forest implication: the active-open-space design must reconcile sport function, tree retention, heat mitigation, carpark shade, earthworks, cost and long-term open-space canopy targets (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • The site has 86 internal trees and 21 street trees outside the boundary (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • Urban-forest implication: the active-open-space design must reconcile sport function, tree retention, heat mitigation, carpark shade, earthworks, cost and long-term open-space canopy targets (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • All 21 street trees are shown as retained (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • Urban-forest implication: the active-open-space design must reconcile sport function, tree retention, heat mitigation, carpark shade, earthworks, cost and long-term open-space canopy targets (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • An arborist assessed 18 High Retention Value trees and the master plan retains six (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • Urban-forest implication: the active-open-space design must reconcile sport function, tree retention, heat mitigation, carpark shade, earthworks, cost and long-term open-space canopy targets (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • The plan supports offset planting to compensate for trees that cannot be retained (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • Urban-forest implication: the active-open-space design must reconcile sport function, tree retention, heat mitigation, carpark shade, earthworks, cost and long-term open-space canopy targets (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • The community consultation period ran from 21 February to 24 March 2025 (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • Urban-forest implication: the active-open-space design must reconcile sport function, tree retention, heat mitigation, carpark shade, earthworks, cost and long-term open-space canopy targets (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • The master plan includes one enclosed main soccer pitch, two soccer pitches with cricket oval overlay, four cricket practice nets, four synthetic small-sided soccer pitches, a community facility, carparking, shared paths, tree planting and landscaping (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • Urban-forest implication: the active-open-space design must reconcile sport function, tree retention, heat mitigation, carpark shade, earthworks, cost and long-term open-space canopy targets (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • The carpark is approximately 200 spaces in the master plan narrative and approximately 190 spaces in the cost-plan table (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • Urban-forest implication: the active-open-space design must reconcile sport function, tree retention, heat mitigation, carpark shade, earthworks, cost and long-term open-space canopy targets (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • The Urban Forest Strategy standard of one canopy tree per five car spaces applies to the carpark design (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • Urban-forest implication: the active-open-space design must reconcile sport function, tree retention, heat mitigation, carpark shade, earthworks, cost and long-term open-space canopy targets (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • The master plan comes close to that standard but cannot plant along the edge between the carpark and small-sided soccer pitches because of space, maintenance and synthetic surface damage risk (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • Urban-forest implication: the active-open-space design must reconcile sport function, tree retention, heat mitigation, carpark shade, earthworks, cost and long-term open-space canopy targets (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • The main soccer pitch requires sports lighting to 500 lux (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • Urban-forest implication: the active-open-space design must reconcile sport function, tree retention, heat mitigation, carpark shade, earthworks, cost and long-term open-space canopy targets (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • The hybrid main pitch surface has a $425,000 cost premium (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • Urban-forest implication: the active-open-space design must reconcile sport function, tree retention, heat mitigation, carpark shade, earthworks, cost and long-term open-space canopy targets (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • The base scheme is estimated at 34,365,000 excluding GST, while the implementation summary states 34,790,000 for full implementation (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • Urban-forest implication: the active-open-space design must reconcile sport function, tree retention, heat mitigation, carpark shade, earthworks, cost and long-term open-space canopy targets (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • Cost escalation beyond July 2025, land acquisition and contaminated soil removal are excluded (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • Urban-forest implication: the active-open-space design must reconcile sport function, tree retention, heat mitigation, carpark shade, earthworks, cost and long-term open-space canopy targets (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • Harlock Consulting recommends 4% annual cost escalation up to construction (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • Urban-forest implication: the active-open-space design must reconcile sport function, tree retention, heat mitigation, carpark shade, earthworks, cost and long-term open-space canopy targets (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • Tree planting allowance is 150 semi-mature trees at 375 each, with 56,250 line cost and $75,000 rounded allowance (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • Urban-forest implication: the active-open-space design must reconcile sport function, tree retention, heat mitigation, carpark shade, earthworks, cost and long-term open-space canopy targets (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • The cricket-net location allows retention of four High Retention Value trees, but shadowing may create unsafe training conditions for batsmen (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • Urban-forest implication: the active-open-space design must reconcile sport function, tree retention, heat mitigation, carpark shade, earthworks, cost and long-term open-space canopy targets (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • The boulevard will include shade planting, bench seating and public lighting (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • Urban-forest implication: the active-open-space design must reconcile sport function, tree retention, heat mitigation, carpark shade, earthworks, cost and long-term open-space canopy targets (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • The informal sitting area will include grassed mounding and tree planting (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • Urban-forest implication: the active-open-space design must reconcile sport function, tree retention, heat mitigation, carpark shade, earthworks, cost and long-term open-space canopy targets (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • The AOS report notes that the Urban Forest Strategy identifies priority planting within Beveridge but not specifically the roads and spaces around Beveridge Central AOS at that stage (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

  • Urban-forest implication: the active-open-space design must reconcile sport function, tree retention, heat mitigation, carpark shade, earthworks, cost and long-term open-space canopy targets (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

Contested Issues

  • Contested issue: risk associated with limb and bark drop (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

  • Mechanism: the issue arises where safety, infrastructure, sport, maintenance, private rights, canopy, biodiversity or heat outcomes compete for the same space or budget (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

  • Feasibility implication: approvals should document the trade-off, mitigation, replacement canopy and monitoring obligation rather than treating the conflict as a landscaping detail (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

  • Contested issue: bushfire risk (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

  • Mechanism: the issue arises where safety, infrastructure, sport, maintenance, private rights, canopy, biodiversity or heat outcomes compete for the same space or budget (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

  • Feasibility implication: approvals should document the trade-off, mitigation, replacement canopy and monitoring obligation rather than treating the conflict as a landscaping detail (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

  • Contested issue: whether gum trees are appropriate in dense urban areas (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

  • Mechanism: the issue arises where safety, infrastructure, sport, maintenance, private rights, canopy, biodiversity or heat outcomes compete for the same space or budget (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

  • Feasibility implication: approvals should document the trade-off, mitigation, replacement canopy and monitoring obligation rather than treating the conflict as a landscaping detail (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

  • Contested issue: tree removals and lack of space for trees in new developments (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

  • Mechanism: the issue arises where safety, infrastructure, sport, maintenance, private rights, canopy, biodiversity or heat outcomes compete for the same space or budget (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

  • Feasibility implication: approvals should document the trade-off, mitigation, replacement canopy and monitoring obligation rather than treating the conflict as a landscaping detail (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

  • Contested issue: poor tree selection on public and private land (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

  • Mechanism: the issue arises where safety, infrastructure, sport, maintenance, private rights, canopy, biodiversity or heat outcomes compete for the same space or budget (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

  • Feasibility implication: approvals should document the trade-off, mitigation, replacement canopy and monitoring obligation rather than treating the conflict as a landscaping detail (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

  • Contested issue: Council maintenance of newly planted and established trees (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

  • Mechanism: the issue arises where safety, infrastructure, sport, maintenance, private rights, canopy, biodiversity or heat outcomes compete for the same space or budget (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

  • Feasibility implication: approvals should document the trade-off, mitigation, replacement canopy and monitoring obligation rather than treating the conflict as a landscaping detail (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

  • Contested issue: poor outcomes for trees under powerlines (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

  • Mechanism: the issue arises where safety, infrastructure, sport, maintenance, private rights, canopy, biodiversity or heat outcomes compete for the same space or budget (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

  • Feasibility implication: approvals should document the trade-off, mitigation, replacement canopy and monitoring obligation rather than treating the conflict as a landscaping detail (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

  • Contested issue: private tree regulation versus owner flexibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

  • Mechanism: the issue arises where safety, infrastructure, sport, maintenance, private rights, canopy, biodiversity or heat outcomes compete for the same space or budget (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

  • Feasibility implication: approvals should document the trade-off, mitigation, replacement canopy and monitoring obligation rather than treating the conflict as a landscaping detail (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

  • Contested issue: sports facility layout versus retention of High Retention Value trees (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

  • Mechanism: the issue arises where safety, infrastructure, sport, maintenance, private rights, canopy, biodiversity or heat outcomes compete for the same space or budget (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

  • Feasibility implication: approvals should document the trade-off, mitigation, replacement canopy and monitoring obligation rather than treating the conflict as a landscaping detail (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

  • Contested issue: carpark supply and synthetic pitch protection versus carpark shade (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

  • Mechanism: the issue arises where safety, infrastructure, sport, maintenance, private rights, canopy, biodiversity or heat outcomes compete for the same space or budget (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

  • Feasibility implication: approvals should document the trade-off, mitigation, replacement canopy and monitoring obligation rather than treating the conflict as a landscaping detail (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

  • Contested issue: cricket training safety versus retention of trees casting shadows (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

  • Mechanism: the issue arises where safety, infrastructure, sport, maintenance, private rights, canopy, biodiversity or heat outcomes compete for the same space or budget (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

  • Feasibility implication: approvals should document the trade-off, mitigation, replacement canopy and monitoring obligation rather than treating the conflict as a landscaping detail (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

  • Contested issue: budget certainty versus escalation and excluded costs (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

  • Mechanism: the issue arises where safety, infrastructure, sport, maintenance, private rights, canopy, biodiversity or heat outcomes compete for the same space or budget (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

  • Feasibility implication: approvals should document the trade-off, mitigation, replacement canopy and monitoring obligation rather than treating the conflict as a landscaping detail (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

Staging And Dependencies

  • Staging requirement: 2024-2026: $3.330 million additional cost implication for early action-plan delivery (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

  • Dependency: later canopy outcomes depend on earlier planting, survival, protection, private-land retention, development controls, funding and asset data (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

  • Staging requirement: 2026-2029: $4.130 million additional cost implication for medium action delivery (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

  • Dependency: later canopy outcomes depend on earlier planting, survival, protection, private-land retention, development controls, funding and asset data (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

  • Staging requirement: 2030-2033: $4.430 million additional cost implication for late action delivery (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

  • Dependency: later canopy outcomes depend on earlier planting, survival, protection, private-land retention, development controls, funding and asset data (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

  • Staging requirement: 2033: fill 95% of vacant street and park sites (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

  • Dependency: later canopy outcomes depend on earlier planting, survival, protection, private-land retention, development controls, funding and asset data (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

  • Staging requirement: 2043: reach 20% average township canopy (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

  • Dependency: later canopy outcomes depend on earlier planting, survival, protection, private-land retention, development controls, funding and asset data (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

  • Staging requirement: 2073: reach 30% average township canopy (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

  • Dependency: later canopy outcomes depend on earlier planting, survival, protection, private-land retention, development controls, funding and asset data (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

  • Staging requirement: 2073: increase road-reserve canopy from 11% to 20% (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

  • Dependency: later canopy outcomes depend on earlier planting, survival, protection, private-land retention, development controls, funding and asset data (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

  • Staging requirement: 2073: increase open-space canopy from 7% to 30% (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

  • Dependency: later canopy outcomes depend on earlier planting, survival, protection, private-land retention, development controls, funding and asset data (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

  • Staging requirement: every three years: remeasure canopy and urban heat for each township (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

  • Dependency: later canopy outcomes depend on earlier planting, survival, protection, private-land retention, development controls, funding and asset data (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

  • Staging requirement: every four years: review action plan progress, targets and indicators (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

  • Dependency: later canopy outcomes depend on earlier planting, survival, protection, private-land retention, development controls, funding and asset data (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

Source Evidence Ledger

  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 1: Taungurung people are the Traditional Owners of (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 1: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 2: of Country a large part of central Victoria and lived on this (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 2: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 3: Country for more than a thousand generations. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 3: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 4: Mitchell Shire Council acknowledges the (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 4: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 5: The Taungurung people are many clans sharing (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 5: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 6: Taungurung and Wurundjeri Woi Wurrung people (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 6: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 7: one language and deep spiritual connection with (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 7: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 8: as the Traditional Owners of the lands and (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 8: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 9: Country. The current generation of Taungurung 1. Executive Summary 2 7. Priority Planting Areas 27 (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 9: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 10: waterways in the area now known as Mitchell (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 10: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 11: people is strongly committed to the resurgence (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 11: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 12: Shire. We pay our respects to their rich cultures 1.1 Scope 3 7.1 Beveridge 28 (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 12: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 13: of their cultural knowledge and practice, (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 13: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 14: and to Elders, past, present and emerging, as (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 14: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 15: reversing the dire effects of colonisation. 7.2 Broadford 29 (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 15: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 16: well as other Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander 1.2 Funding the Urban Forest Strategy (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 16: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 17: people who live, work and play in the area. “When our Country is sick, we are sick. When Implementation 3 (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 17: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 18: We recognise the composition of Aboriginal our Country is healthy, we can become healthy. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 18: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 19: communities in Mitchell is multifaceted. True Taking an active role in caring for Country 7.4 Pyalong 31 (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 19: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 20: self-determination within municipal boundaries makes us strong and unites us as a community. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 20: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 21: ensures all cohorts in the community are Our active engagement with other land (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 21: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 22: represented with equitable voice, and that managers benefits Country for all. To achieve 7.6 Tallarook 33 (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 22: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 23: decisions which effect Aboriginal and Torres this aspiration, we require our own People (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 23: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 24: Strait Islander communities in Mitchell are participating as land managers from decision- 3.1 Benefits of Urban Forests 6 (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 24: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 25: explored and undertaken in partnership with local making inceptions through day-to-day work 7.8 Waterford Park 35 (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 25: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 26: on Country. We need to build our two ways 3.2 Vision 7 (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 26: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 27: knowledge and skills to do this: 7.9 Wallan and Hidden Valley 36 (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 27: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 28: 1. Taungurung Knowledge, strategies and tools 7.10 Wandong/Heathcote Junction 36 (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 28: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 29: 2. Contemporary knowledge, strategies and tools (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 29: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 30: 8. Focus Action Areas for our Urban Forest 37 (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 30: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 31: Together we can accelerate healing for Country. 4. Our Urban Forest 9 (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 31: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 32: Everybody wins.” (Source: Taungurung Country 8.1 Tree Planting Themes 37 (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 32: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 33: Wurundjeri Woi Wurrung 4.3 Street Tree Species Diversity 13 9. Action Plan 40 (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 33: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 34: Tallarook Wurundjeri Woi Wurrung people take their name 4.4 Vacant Sites 14 Objective 1: Adapt to Climate Change 41 (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 34: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 35: from the Woiwurrung language word ‘wurun’ (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 35: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 36: Broadford meaning the Manna Gum (Eucalyptus viminalis) 4.5 Urban Heat 15 Objective 2: Enhance Natural Environment 43 (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 36: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 37: which is common along ‘Birrarung’ (Yarra River), Objective 3: Grow Happy and Healthy (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 37: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 38: and ‘djeri ‘, the grub which is found in or near the 5. How we Manage our Urban Forest 17 (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 38: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 39: Heathcote Junction tree. Wurundjeri are the ‘Witchetty Grub People’ (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 39: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 40: and their Ancestors have lived on this land for Objective 4: Leadership in UF Management 46 (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 40: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 41: 9.1 Action Plan Timeframe Costing 49 (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 41: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 42: 5.4 Public Trees (Council Managed) 20 (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 42: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 43: 6. Our Community and the Urban Forest 26 (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 43: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 44: This strategy covers all trees and shrubs within (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 44: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 45: the urban boundaries of established and growing The strategy will assist in directing council (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 45: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 46: settlements in the shire, within the public and resources to locations of highest priority. Budgets (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 46: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 47: private realm. It sets the strategic direction on will be prepared for each of the short, medium, (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 47: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 48: Our Urban Forest faces many challenges how to protect, enhance and manage our urban (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 48: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 49: Mitchell Shire’s urban forest long and ongoing actions aligning to timeframe (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 49: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 50: including: forest over the next 10, 20 and 50 years. years of delivery. This will include both Capital (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 50: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 51: • Climate Change – harsher conditions for trees The Action Plan (section 9) is a 10-year plan and Operational funding avenues as appropriate. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 51: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 52: community asset and includes to establish, survive and thrive. that applies to a range of vegetation types, (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 52: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 53: trees, vegetation and grasslands • Urban Development – loss of canopy due to irrespective of species, origin or ownership. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 53: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 54: within townships. development across the shire. Priorities are based on short (1-3 years), medium 1.3 Monitoring and Evaluation (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 54: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 55: (4-6 years) and long term (beyond 7-10 years) (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 55: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 56: • Community Perception – a negative The Action Plan (Section 9) will be reviewed every (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 56: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 57: Trees in both the public and private realm provide timeframes as well as ongoing actions. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 57: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 58: perception of trees from a risk, litter or four years. This review will include evaluation (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 58: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 59: shade (cooling effect), intercept stormwater, infrastructure damage perspective. of the progress, targets and indicators outlined (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 59: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 60: store carbon, provide habitat, enhance amenity throughout the strategy. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 60: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 61: • Emergency Management - bushfires, floods (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 61: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 62: and property values, and improves general (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 62: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 63: and storms have already caused significant (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 63: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 64: health and wellbeing. These trees provide 12% of (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 64: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 65: impacts to some of our communities in our (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 65: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 66: canopy coverage across the shire. The northern Image 2: The scope of this Strategy includes all of the townships in the image above excluding (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 66: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 67: very recent past, and the financial and health (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 67: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 68: and central townships have higher canopy cover Puckapunyal. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 68: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 69: and wellbeing strain can be overwhelming. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 69: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 70: (Tallarook, Kilmore East, Wandong, Seymour) than (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 70: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 71: Damage from these events can be exacerbated (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 71: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 72: those in the south (Beveridge and Wallan). (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 72: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 73: Council manages around 56,000 trees in road • Funding and Resources – finite funding (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 73: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 74: reserves, parks and other public land. We have an makes increasing tree planting and other (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 74: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 75: estimated 12,000 vacant street tree sites, which is opportunities difficult, especially when (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 75: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 76: a major opportunity to increase canopy coverage competing with other services. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 76: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 77: The Urban Forest Strategy (‘strategy’) aims (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 77: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 78: In addition, the private realm also plays an to mitigate these challenges by setting clear (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 78: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 79: important role in increasing the shire’s canopy objectives, actions and targets to be delivered (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 79: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 80: A key focus of the strategy will be to increase (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 80: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 81: canopy coverage within road reserves and (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 81: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 82: parks andidentify opportunities to improve tree (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 82: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 83: retention and protection on private land. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 83: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 84: To achieve this, council has identified the following key targets for this strategy: (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 84: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 85: Target Timeframe (Yrs) Year of delivery (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 85: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 86: Increase planting of trees within road reserves and parks to fill 95% of (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 86: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 87: Average township canopy coverage of 20% 20 2043 (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 87: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 88: Average township canopy coverage of 30% 50 2073 (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 88: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 89: Increase average of road reserve tree canopy coverage from 11% to 20% 50 2073 (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 89: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 90: Increase average open space tree canopy coverage from 7% to 30% 50 2073 (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 90: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 91: This is the first strategy of its kind for our shire. It We currently manage around 41,000 street and Our urban forest faces a number of key This strategy targets our key focus areas for the (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 91: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 92: celebrates the unique and deep reaching social, 15,000 park trees across our townships. We challenges that we need to address in partnership next 10, 20 and 50 years so that we can work (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 92: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 93: environmental and economic benefits that our have been working hard to improve the way with our community, other government agencies, towards meeting our organisational net zero (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 93: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 94: urban forest, provides to our local communities we care for and manage these trees as part developers and landholders. Climate change, targets, help care and heal our country and create (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 94: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 95: and our local environment. Our local Traditional of protecting and enhancing our urban forest a fast-developing urban growth area, infill liveable, breathable communities for the future. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 95: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 96: Owners value the importance of caring for and including trialling new species that will thrive development pressures, changing community (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 96: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 97: The strategy provides a clear pathway in meeting (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 97: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 98: healing country and our urban forests are a key under changing climate, planting more trees in perceptions and preferences have all impacted on (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 98: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 99: our Community Strategic Vision of being “a (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 99: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 100: part of this process. our streetscapes and working more closely with our ability to deliver a sustainable urban forest. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 100: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 101: healthy, vibrant and connected community that (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 101: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 102: developers to find better outcomes to protect (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 102: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 103: An Urban Forest is the collection of trees, values nature, diversity and innovation”. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 103: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 104: understory and grassland, growing within and (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 104: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 105: around townships. It is the collective sum of all We also recognise that there are things that (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 105: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 106: vegetation in these locations, both on public and need improving, namely tree protection and (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 106: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 107: To achieve this vision, we’re aiming to increase average tree (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 107: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 108: private land. enhancement, both in the public and the private (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 108: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 109: realm. A majority of all land within Mitchell Shire (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 109: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 110: canopy cover over our townships incrementally: (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 110: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 111: Looking after our urban forests is one of the (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 111: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 112: (70%) is privately owned, with 75% of our urban (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 112: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 113: most effective ways to help mitigate and adapt (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 113: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 114: forest . This means that privately owned land is (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 114: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 115: to climate change. Trees cool our townships, ships: (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 115: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 116: critical for supporting our urban forest. Currently, r town (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 116: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 117: intercept stormwater, cycle nutrients into the ou (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 117: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 118: we have limited protections or incentives in place er (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 118: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 119: soil and provide habitat and food for wildlife. r ov (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 119: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 120: to retain trees on private land. Our community ve We’ll do this by: 2023: 12% (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 120: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 121: Our urban forest also provides the soft green co (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 121: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 122: backdrop to each of our townships and new (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 122: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 123: have told us that new developments are not y (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 123: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 124: doing enough to protect existing trees on Aave (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 124: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 125: urban area, enriching landscape character and (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 125: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 126: development sites. In addition, the community (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 126: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 127: our sense of place. When valued for some of et (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 127: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 128: its core environmental benefits and structural (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 128: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 129: is concerned that new developments are not ree Planting (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 129: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 130: providing ample space on new allotments to ca 10% more (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 130: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 131: value, our urban forest is worth in excess of understory (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 131: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 132: adequately enable the planting of future trees.2  2043: 20% (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 132: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 133: Mitchell Shire Council Urban Forest Community Engagement Survey 2023 (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 133: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 134: Our urban forest plays a crucial role in helping (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 134: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 135: This strategy and our ongoing urban forest (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 135: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 136: us achieve our 2050 Community Vision, which management program, seeks to meet the (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 136: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 137: states: ‘We are a healthy, vibrant and connected following strategic objectives for council: (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 137: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 138: community that values nature, diversity and (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 138: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 139: innovation‘. 1. Adapt and mitigate our townships to climate (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 139: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 140: Growing and caring for our urban forests is At council, we value the significant community (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 140: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 141: important to the health and wellbeing of our benefits of our urban forests which includes We are committed to working with and (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 141: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 142: community, as highlighted in the Nature and all of the trees, shrubs and gardens on public supporting our communities to build healthier, Work towards a climate adapted, resilient, net (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 142: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 143: Parks theme of the Mitchell 2050 Vision, which and private urban land. We are dedicated to greener and more resilient places throughout the zero emissions Shire by protecting our existing (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 143: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 144: includes the community aspiration: ’In 2050, managing, protecting and enhancing urban shire. urban forest, increasing tree canopy cover (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 144: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 145: Mitchell will be home to a vibrant and thriving forests into the future. in areas of need and planning for extreme (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 145: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 146: natural environment where nature is part of weather events. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 146: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 147: resident’s everyday life‘. Our urban forests help • being one of the most cost effective and (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 147: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 148: maintain the relaxed country feel of our shire, efficient mechanisms for adapting our 2. Support and enhance our natural (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 148: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 149: cool and beautify our townships, while providing townships to climate change environment. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 149: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 150: critical wildlife habitat as well as social and Protect and grow our urban forest to (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 150: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 151: • reducing daytime and surface temperatures (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 151: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 152: economic benefits. strengthen the ecological value of our streets, (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 152: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 153: and providing shade during hot weather (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 153: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 154: • contributing to neighbourhood character and (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 154: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 155: 3.1 Benefits of Urban Forests streetscape amenity 3. Grow healthy and happy neighbourhoods. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 155: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 156: • encouraging pedestrian and cyclist activity Ensure the right trees and vegetation are (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 156: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 157: along our streets and in our parks planted where they are needed the most to (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 157: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 158: • improving energy efficiency in our homes provide more natural shade, enhance our (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 158: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 159: township amenity to support vibrant and (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 159: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 160: • reducing speed of motorists along treed (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 160: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 161: sustainable neighbourhoods, green-up our (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 161: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 162: public spaces and encourage healthier more (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 162: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 163: • improving mental wellbeing and physical active and engaged communities. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 163: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 164: 4. Become a regional leader in managing our (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 164: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 165: • providing fresh air and absorbing carbon (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 165: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 166: We have a responsibility and opportunity (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 166: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 167: • creating habitat for local flora and fauna (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 167: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 168: to provide leadership within the regional (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 168: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 169: • increasing economic activity in retail areas by Victorian context around the management and (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 169: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 170: creating well landscaped and ambient spaces. protection of our urban forest. This strongly (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 170: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 171: relates to emergency management and how (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 171: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 172: We commit to achieving this vision by working (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 172: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 173: with and supporting our communities to build (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 173: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 174: healthier, greener and more resilient places and (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 174: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 175: Mitchell Shire Council Urban Forest Strategy 2023 (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 175: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 176: We aim to achieve the following measures • filling our vacant street and park sites to (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 176: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 177: through the delivery of the Strategy: 95% capacity by 2033 in line with Street Tree (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 177: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 178: Planting Guidelines to maximise diversity (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 178: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 179: 1. We will increase average township tree and ecological resilience. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 179: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 180: canopy cover to 20% by 2043 and to 30% by • ensuring all new public carparks or upgrades Our urban forest consists of trees, shrubs and Further to this, our public trees store an (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 180: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 181: 2073 by meeting the following targets: meet a minimum of one canopy tree per 5 grasses over private and public land within our estimated $586,000 worth of carbon dioxide and (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 181: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 182: • Average Road reserve tree canopy from 11% spaces townships. Council manages an estimated 41,000 provide over $80,000 in annual benefits including (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 182: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 183: to 20% street trees and over 15,000 park trees. We do stormwater interception, air pollution reduction (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 183: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 184: • ensuring all open space capital and upgrade (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 184: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 185: not have the data to tell us how many trees are and carbon sequestration. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 185: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 186: • Average Open space tree canopy cover from works meet a net gain tree canopy cover (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 186: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 187: on privately owned or other state government (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 187: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 188: 7% to 30% post completion. It’s worth noting that other environmental (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 188: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 189: benefits such as biodiversity, habitat provision, (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 189: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 190: • Aiming for net gain of tree canopy cover • encouraging and incentivising residents and (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 190: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 191: and improvements in community mental (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 191: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 192: on private residential land within township other landholders to plant more trees on (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 192: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 193: and physical wellbeing are equally important, (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 193: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 194: 4.1 Value however it’s much harder to put a dollar value on (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 194: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 195: We will do this by: • better protect our existing and viable trees them and therefore they are not included in the (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 195: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 196: Our public urban forest, i.e., trees managed by (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 196: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 197: on private land in established areas. I-Tree Eco tool. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 197: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 198: • targeting a street and open space tree Council, are worth an incredible $140 million (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 198: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 199: planting program towards areas of need based on an assessment through I-Tree Eco, a Based on current I-Tree Eco modelling, if we meet (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 199: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 200: 2. We will increase understory plantings across (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 200: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 201: to reduce urban heat, provide shade in widely used and industry accepted tree valuation our tree canopy targets, our urban forest could be (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 201: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 202: our more vulnerable neighbourhoods and tool. This is how much it would cost to replace all worth an estimated $224 million. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 202: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 203: improve township amenity We will do this by: of our trees to the same size and extent they are (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 203: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 204: • revegetating along waterways and key bio now, delivering the same benefits. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 204: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 205: • improving tree cover within high (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 205: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 206: pedestrian areas including cycling routes links on council managed land (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 206: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 207: of our townships including main streets, • include understory and ground cover Table 1: I-Tree Eco environmental values of our street and some park trees1 (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 207: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 208: thoroughfares, town centres and retail species in landscaping projects (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 208: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 209: nodes, train stations and transport nodes (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 209: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 210: and future open space reserves. Replacement value $140 million (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 210: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 211: Management principles, including the use of (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 211: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 212: • requiring new development estates to vegetation (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 212: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 213: Carbon Stored $586,000 or 26 metric tonnes (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 213: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 214: achieve a minimum of 30% tree canopy (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 214: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 215: • protecting and enhancing council’s (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 215: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 216: cover over public land (VPA guidelines) Total annual benefits: $81,000 (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 216: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 217: • ensuring that all newly built community Pollution removed $30,900 per year or 13.3 metric tonnes (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 217: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 218: hubs and community infrastructure such as (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 218: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 219: schools achieve 30% urban forest (tree and Carbon sequestered $16,300 per year or 713 metric tonnes (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 219: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 220: Avoided stormwater runoff $34,000 per year or 15,000 cubic metres (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 220: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 221: social, economic and Oxygen produced 1,900 metric tonnes per year (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 221: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 222: 4.2 Tree canopy Tree canopy cover varies between townships with I-Tree Eco, based on our tree data, has identified the ten most important species within our township for (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 222: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 223: the highest recorded for Tallarook at 24% and their contribution to tree canopy area. They are also the species that store more carbon, intercept more (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 223: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 224: Tree canopy cover is the extent of tree biomass the lowest in our urban growth areas, including stormwater and filter more air pollution. They are as follows: (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 224: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 225: and therefore shade, covering an area. Tree Wallan and Beveridge. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 225: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 226: canopy cover includes all vegetation over 3m in Table 2: Top 10 species by importance for tree canopy cover (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 226: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 227: height, so newly planted trees, which may have This tree canopy however is not evenly (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 227: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 228: significant future canopy, are not likely to be distributed over public and private land. As stated Percent Percent Importance (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 228: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 229: previously, 70% of the land area of our townships Species Name Common Name Population Leaf Area value (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 229: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 230: is under private ownership and 75% of our urban Eucalyptus camaldulensis River Red Gum 8.40% 7.7 16.1 (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 230: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 231: Tree canopy across both public and private forest lies on private land. The breakdown of the Eucalyptus melliodora Yellow box 5.90% 5.4 11.3 (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 231: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 232: land, covers 12% of the shire’s townships. If amount of tree canopy on public and private land Eucalyptus microcarpa Grey box 6.40% 3.4 9.8 (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 232: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 233: shrubs and grasses are included and defined as is shown in image 4 below. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 233: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 234: urban forest cover, the coverage is much higher Pyrus calleryana Ornamental Pear 5.10% 4.4 9.5 (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 234: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 235: (70% of township area). This is indicative of Eucalyptus viminalis Manna gum 3.50% 5.5 9 (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 235: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 236: regional landscapes with historically low-density Eucalyptus leucoxylon Yellow Gum 3.50% 5.2 8.7 (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 236: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 237: development and large amounts of grass cover. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 237: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 238: Eucalyptus polyanthemos Red box 2.80% 4.1 6.9 (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 238: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 239: Eucalyptus sideroxylon Red ironbark 2.40% 4 6.4 (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 239: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 240: Image 3: Tree canopy cover (vegetation over 3m in height) by township. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 240: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 241: Eucalyptus cephalocarpa Silver stringybark 1.50% 4.2 5.7 (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 241: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 242: 30% Eucalyptus goniocalyx Long leaved box 2.90% 2.6 5.5 (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 242: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 243: 15% 13% 12% 12% 12% Unsurprisingly, the most important tree However, it is worth noting that there is an (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 243: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 244: species are those that are native to the region over-representation of these trees in some new (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 244: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 245: and are larger in stature. All except one are developments creating diversity issues. While (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 245: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 246: native. Pyrus calleryana, the ornamental pears, we wouldn’t seek to actively remove these trees (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 246: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 247: Wandong/ Broadford Seymour Tooborac Pyalong Wallan (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 247: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 248: are seen as providing significant value to our given their value, we need to limit any future (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 248: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 249: Township overall tree canopy. plantings of these and cease any new plantings (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 249: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 250: Image 4: Tree canopy in m2 over private and public land for each township. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 250: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 251: Private tree canopy Public tree canopy (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 251: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 252: 48% 79% 51% 91% 83% 66% 49% 87% 72% 91% 57% (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 252: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 253: Benchmarking Canopy Cover Canopy Cover by Land Use 4.3 Street Tree Species Diversity (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 253: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 254: Research from Australia and overseas suggests Our canopy cover by land use type or zone, differs The top ten most common tree species in our streets include: (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 254: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 255: that optimal tree canopy cover should be significantly as well. Environmental Reserves (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 255: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 256: somewhere between 30-40% depending on the naturally have high canopy cover at 31%, however Table 5: Top 10 most common tree species in our urban streets (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 256: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 257: climate, bioregion and vegetation type. This is the our open spaces have very low canopy at just (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 257: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 258: optimal level required to appropriately reduce 7%. This open space includes all of our sporting Species Name Common Name Count population (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 258: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 259: urban heat and improve urban cooling as well fields, local parks in our residential areas and new Eucalyptus camaldulensis River Red Gum 3,979 8.4% (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 259: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 260: as intercept stormwater to a level that sees a parks in our subdivisions. Some of these new (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 260: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 261: Eucalyptus microcarpa Grey box 3,017 6.4% (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 261: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 262: reduction in stormwater flows. Even at the lower parks show very little tree canopy cover as they (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 262: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 263: Eucalyptus melliodora Yellow box 2,771 5.9% (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 263: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 264: end of the optimal scale, i.e. 30%, our 12% average either have just been planted or are waiting to be (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 264: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 265: Pyrus calleryana Ornamental Pear 2,414 5.1% (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 265: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 266: is low. To put this into context, other regional planted out. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 266: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 267: Eucalyptus leucoxylon Yellow gum 1,660 3.5% (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 267: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 268: councils record the following baseline urban tree (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 268: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 269: Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 1,649 3.5% (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 269: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 270: canopy cover and respective targets in Table 3. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 270: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 271: Acacia melanoxylon Blackwood 1,493 3.2% (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 271: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 272: Eucalyptus goniocalyx Long leaved box 1,380 2.9% (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 272: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 273: Eucalyptus polyanthemos Red box 1,307 2.8% (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 273: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 274: Table 3: Existing and targeted tree canopy cover for comparable townships in Victoria (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 274: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 275: Eucalyptus sideroxylon Red ironbark 1,152 2.4% (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 275: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 276: Local Council Tree Canopy Cover Tree Canopy Cover All but one of these are native to Australia, with the only exotic being the ornamental pear. However, (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 276: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 277: 25% by 2030 this does not reflect the types of species that council has planted in streets over the last 5 years. It is (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 277: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 278: City of Greater Bendigo (urban area only) 20.9% (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 278: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 279: 35% by 2050 possible that some of the larger specimens of the Eucalypts are remnant trees and therefore highly (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 279: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 280: Whittlesea (urban area only) 11% 20% increase by 2040 valuable as they also store and sequester more carbon than smaller or other varieties. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 280: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 281: Township of Shepparton 18% 40% by 2037 The most commonly planted species in our streets over the last 5 years are: (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 281: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 282: City of Ballarat 17% 40% by 2040 Table 6: Twenty most commonly planted street trees in the last 5 years (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 282: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 283: Campaspe Shire Council (Echuca) 11% 20% by 2045 Species Name Common Name Species Name Common Name (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 283: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 284: Quercus palustris Pin oaks Eucalyptus scoparia Wallangarra white gum (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 284: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 285: Campaspe Shire Council (Rushworth) 33% Maintain (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 285: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 286: Angophora costata Smooth barked apple Pyrus calleryana Callery pear (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 286: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 287: myrtle Corymbia citriodora Lemon scented gum (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 287: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 288: Table 4: Existing tree canopy cover by land use type or zone Pyrus calleryana ‘Capital’ Callery Pear ’Capital’ Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green ash (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 288: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 289: Eucalyptus melliodora Yellow box ‘Cimmzam’ ’Cimmzam’ (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 289: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 290: Land use type/zone Tree Canopy Cover Eucalyptus sideroxylon Red ironbark Acer rubrum Red maple (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 290: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 291: Townships 12% Eucalyptus leucoxylon Yellow gum Brachychiton acerifolious Kurrajong (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 291: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 292: Ulmus parvifolia Chinese elm ‘Jerilderie Red’ ’Jerilderie red’ (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 292: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 293: All privately owned land in townships 11% Acacia melanoxylon Blackwood (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 293: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 294: All publicly owned land (including roads, open space, Council property and state govt polyanthemos Corymbia eximia Yellow bloodwood (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 294: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 295: managed land) in townships Lagerstroemia indica Crepe myrtle (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 295: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 296: Township open space 7% Corymbia maculata Spotted gum ‘Todd’ (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 296: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 297: This list of most commonly planted street tree species in the last 5 years, demonstrates a much greater (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 297: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 298: Township Environmental Reserves 31% diversity of species. It reflects the active decision making by council to diversify its species palette to (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 298: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 299: Public Schools 8% account for a changing climate, increase tree vitality, reduce conflicts with infrastructure and improve (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 299: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 300: overall township amenity. Of the 20 most commonly planted street tree species, 12 are native to (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 300: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 301: Residential zoned land (GRZ, LDRZ, NRZ, TZ) 13% (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 301: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 302: Australia and only six are Eucalypts. The remainder being exotic deciduous trees such as Ornamental (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 302: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 303: Pears, Oaks, Ash and Elms. We aim to continue this diversity of species planting to ensure a resilient (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 303: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 304: and diversified urban forest into the future. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 304: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 305: We’ve mapped approximately 12,000 vacant street The following table lists the number of vacant Urban heat was mapped for each township (December 2022) to determine areas of high heat impact. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 305: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 306: tree sites across our townships. There are many street tree sites identified within each township: (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 306: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 307: Seymour (pictured below) showcases large dark roofs, wide roads with no tree cover and open dirt (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 307: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 308: more open space and reserve planting sites (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 308: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 309: patches as the highest heat loads (shown as red). The irrigated parks and river corridors and industrial (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 309: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 310: available but they have not yet been mapped. Table 7: Vacant Street tree planting sites by (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 310: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 311: buildings with white reflective roofs are showing as the coolest areas (blue). (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 311: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 312: Our current planting program is budgeted to (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 312: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 313: plant 600 trees annually. At these levels, it Vacant Street Image 5: Thermal heat mapping of Seymour in December 2022 showing hotspots in red (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 313: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 314: would take around 95 years to fill all vacant (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 314: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 315: sites. We should be aiming to fill these street Wallan 3,935 (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 315: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 316: tree sites within a 10-year timeframe. This (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 316: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 317: means increasing our current program from 600 (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 317: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 318: trees annually to planting almost 2,000 street Kilmore 2,222 (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 318: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 319: trees each year: 500 – 600 trees on average per Broadford 1,210 (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 319: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 320: year to replace those that are removed and an (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 320: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 321: additional 1,200 trees to fill vacant sites. Whilst (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 321: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 322: this will require significant investments, we will Pyalong 470 (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 322: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 323: continue to look at ways to reduce costs of (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 323: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 324: planting through species selection, size of trees (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 324: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 325: planted in strategic areas and maintenance Tallarook 83 (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 325: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 326: Image 6: Building in Seymour. The dark roof is Image 7: Chittick Park, carpark, tennis complex (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 326: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 327: almost 20 degrees hotter than the white roof and Seymour Sports and Aquatic Centre (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 327: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 328: Below is a ground based thermal image of the IGA Supermarket carpark in Seymour, which also shows (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 328: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 329: as a hot spot in the aerial thermal mapping. Surface temperature at the recorded site is 50 degrees (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 329: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 330: Celsius compared to the concrete shaded by trees which is 24 degrees Celsius. This provides clear (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 330: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 331: evidence for large canopy trees to cool hardstand areas, especially within car park areas. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 331: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 332: carpark showing 5.1 History plantings such as large deciduous Elm and Oak (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 332: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 333: the temperature trees. More recently, the Defence Force base in (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 333: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 334: The shire is home to a great diversity of Puckapunyal and our commitment to honouring (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 334: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 335: between exposed bioregions. It sits at the junction point ex-service men and women has brought attention (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 335: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 336: concrete and where the Victorian Volcanic Plains meets back to the use of native species, e.g. at the (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 336: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 337: tree shaded the Northeast Victorian highland bounded Vietnam Veterans Memorial in Seymour. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 337: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 338: concrete by the hills of the Macedon Ranges and (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 338: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 339: We are now graced with urban areas that (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 339: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 340: incorporating the Goulburn River. As a result, (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 340: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 341: provide a diversity of value to our diverse (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 341: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 342: our native landscapes provide a richly diverse (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 342: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 343: communities, which is worth protecting and (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 343: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 344: Past tree and plant species selection in our (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 344: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 345: townships has been heavily influenced by our (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 345: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 346: natural landscapes but also by our rich heritage. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 346: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 347: The gold mining era and its legacy of infrastructure (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 347: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 348: prompted the planting of more European style (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 348: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 349: The image below shows the surface temperature differentials in the carpark of Broadford Primary (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 349: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 350: School. The majority of the carpark reaches up to 52 degrees (coloured red) while the tree on the (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 350: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 351: footpath cools one carpark to 35 degrees while the grass verge is only 21 degrees. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 351: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 352: 5.2 Responsibilities Document Relevance (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 352: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 353: While the protection and growth of our urban forest is everyone’s responsibility, our varied spheres Council Plan 2021- • Establish Council as a recognised leader in sustainable environmental management (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 353: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 354: of influence means that overall responsibility for things like risk, is complicated. Different trees are (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 354: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 355: governed by different policies and management regimes depending on who manages the land on Environment • Bio link projects (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 355: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 356: Strategy 2014-2024 • Review planning provisions for vegetation protection (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 356: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 357: which they grow. A number of agencies, departments and individuals govern our urban forest as (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 357: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 358: • Develop significant tree register (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 358: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 359: outlined below: • Expand and implement Water Sensitive Urban Design (WSUD) (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 359: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 360: • Better Environmentally Sustainable Development (ESD) outcomes in new (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 360: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 361: Authority Role in growing and maintaining our urban forests developments (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 361: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 362: Mitchell Shire Council • All street and park trees on Council owned and managed land. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 362: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 363: • Emergency management. Net Zero Action 2023 • Increase carbon uptake through afforestation and canopy cover in townships (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 363: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 364: • Administration of the Planning and Environment Act 1987. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 364: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 365: • Community engagement and education. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 365: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 366: • Administration of the Mitchell Shire Planning Scheme. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 366: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 367: Goulburn Murray • Recognising the role that urban trees in helping our towns adapt to climate change. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 367: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 368: Regional Roads Victoria • Roadside trees along Regional Roads Victoria roads. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 368: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 369: Climate Alliance Highlights opportunities for the 13 member Councils to work together e.g. tree stock (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 369: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 370: Parks Victoria • Trees and shrubs within Parks Victoria managed parks and reserves. Naturally Cooler procurement, data collection, compliance (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 370: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 371: Utility Service Providers • All have regulated clearance zones around their assets and must (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 371: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 372: (Electricity, Gas, Water) undertake pruning etc to keep these clearance zones safe. Living Melbourne • 32 metropolitan councils, state government agencies, non-government and community (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 372: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 373: – Our Metropolitan organisations united around a common vision for Melbourne’s urban forest – “our (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 373: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 374: Residential • Trees and shrubs in backyards and front gardens. Urban Forest thriving communities are resilient, connected through nature” (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 374: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 375: Traditional Owners and • Take an active role in caring for and healing country for future generations Urban Tree • Council is committed to responding to our changing climate by increasing canopy (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 375: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 376: Custodians which includes protecting parks, reserves and culturally significant trees Management Policy cover by planting tree species that are adaptable to local conditions as well as (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 376: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 377: and vegetation. 2021 protecting, enhancing and properly managing its urban tree population (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 377: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 378: Victorian Planning Authority • Guides the master planned development outcomes for growth areas. Operational Tree • Stipulates technical guidelines for all aspects of tree management (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 378: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 379: Developers • Retaining, large established trees and planting new trees subdivision Management (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 379: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 380: development of new homes and communities. Procedures (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 380: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 381: CFA and SES • Emergency Management including bushfire, flood and heat wave events. Electrical Line • Articulates Council’s vegetation management processes and strategies to care for its (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 381: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 382: Clearance trees that are in the vicinity electricity assets (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 382: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 383: Department of Environment, • Trees and shrubs within DEECA managed parks and reserves (crown land). Management Plan (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 383: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 384: Energy and Climate Action • Administration of the Planning and Environment Act 1987. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 384: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 385: (DEECA) Municipal Emergency • Increase capacity and capability within the community to improve MSC’s preparedness (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 385: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 386: Management Plan for emergency events (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 386: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 387: Catchment Management • Riverine and waterway health. 2021-2024 (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 387: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 388: Environment Policy • Practice, promote and encourage sustainable, innovative and adaptive land (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 388: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 389: 2020 management that responds to climate change. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 389: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 390: • Protect, restore and connect landscapes by increasing the extent and quality of native (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 390: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 391: 5.3 Strategic Context • Reduce water use (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 391: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 392: The current governance of our public urban forest, i.e. our street, park and reserve trees and vegetation • Environmentally Sustainable Design is a core principle for all new developments. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 392: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 393: within our townships, is influenced by a number of our key documents. It is worth noting that council Climate Emergency • To reduce the impact of extreme heat across Mitchell Shire (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 393: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 394: has limited local planning controls to protect vegetation and primarily relies on state government Action Plan • To protect and enhance the natural environment and support a climate resilient (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 394: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 395: vegetation protection policy. agricultural sector in Mitchell Shire (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 395: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 396: Township • Provide planning and urban design frameworks for the growth and renewal of our (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 396: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 397: Document Relevance Development, townships. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 397: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 398: Community Vision • Vibrant Communities – access to high quality community infrastructure (which (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 398: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 399: • Working, Learning and Tourism – proud of our natural assets Neighbourhood • An assessment of the values contributing to neighbourhood character for each (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 399: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 400: • Travelling and getting around – travel will be environmentally sustainable, better Character Study township including trees (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 400: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 401: • Shaping Neighbourhoods – retain the small-town character (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 401: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 402: • Nature and Parks – increase native vegetation and taking advantage of natural assets (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 402: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 403: • Climate Action – cooler, greener and cleaner urban spaces and carbon neutral (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 403: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 404: 5.4 Public Trees We will do this by: 5.4.1 What We’re Doing Well 5.4.2 What We Can Improve (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 404: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 405: (Council Managed) 1. Protecting, maintaining and enhancing existing Over the last five years we’ve made some A gap analysis has revealed the following key (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 405: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 406: council managed trees by implementing the significant changes to our urban forest opportunities: (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 406: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 407: We plan for, plant and maintain all trees under (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 407: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 408: Australian Standards for the protection of management program, including: (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 408: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 409: our control including street, open space trees • Historically funds for current annual planting (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 409: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 410: and environment reserve trees. These trees are • We’ve invested in collecting high quality data programs only enable the number of council (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 410: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 411: actively inspected on our routine basis, data is 2. Seeking compensation for the loss of our about our urban forest to help us make quicker trees being planted to cover the number of (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 411: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 412: collected on each one of them and utilised to trees as a result of development by placing and more evidence-based decisions about tree trees being removed. So we are not making (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 412: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 413: inform management decisions and programs. a monetary value (Amenity value based on management. any headway into reducing the number of (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 413: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 414: an adapted City of Melbourne method) on all vacant sites (net gain). (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 414: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 415: Other vegetation, such as shrubs and understory, • We’re trialling the use of new species that are (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 415: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 416: council managed trees – this value is then (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 416: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 417: is less actively managed and as a result there is likely to perform well into the future under a • Most of our trees planted each year are in (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 417: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 418: held as a bond and if the tree is damaged or (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 418: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 419: limited data available. changing climate. streets and not parks. Trees are primarily only (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 419: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 420: requires removal, the amenity value must be (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 420: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 421: planted in parks during capital works projects. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 421: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 422: Our policy for managing our public trees as paid to council. • We run annual National Tree Day community (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 422: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 423: stated in our Urban Tree Management Policy is: Planting events and support local schools • While we have detailed data on the useful life (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 423: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 424: 3. Removing only trees that meet the criteria set (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 424: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 425: through our Grants for Plants program to plant expectancy of our trees, we are yet to develop (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 425: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 426: out within our Operational Procedures that (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 426: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 427: Council is committed to native vegetation on school grounds. a strategic tree renewal program to ensure (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 427: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 428: responding to our changing • Our engineers and landscape officers seek to (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 428: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 429: succession of trees reaching the end of their (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 429: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 430: a. dead, dying or immediately hazardous useful lives. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 430: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 431: climate by increasing canopy find better outcomes for trees in their daily (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 431: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 432: b. documented evidence of causing damage to work. We focus on putting the right tree in the • Not all trees are planted by our Tree (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 432: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 433: cover by planting tree species that infrastructure or property right place, to maximise benefits and minimise Management team, which leads to (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 433: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 434: are adaptable to local conditions c. where approved as part of a development risks. management inconsistencies and sometimes (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 434: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 435: as well as protecting, enhancing where all other options for tree retention poor outcomes such as poor maintenance. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 435: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 436: • We’ve been working alongside some (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 436: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 437: have been exhausted by the applicant. All Council tree planting programs need to (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 437: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 438: and properly managing its urban developers to explore better outcomes for (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 438: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 439: 4. Supporting the enhancement of streetscapes be brought in-house so they can be managed (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 439: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 440: trees in our growth area, including specifying (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 440: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 441: tree population. and amenity throughout the shire by the Tree Management team. Developers (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 441: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 442: protection requirements for trees on (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 442: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 443: will continue to plant their own trees with (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 443: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 444: 5. Being considerate of areas prone to bushfire development sites. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 444: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 445: guidance from council as to species and (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 445: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 446: including urban areas interfacing rural • We retain dead trees with hollows and stags locations. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 446: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 447: communities, when selecting tree species and (a tree with all live branches removed leaving (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 447: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 448: planting location • Council currently has no strategic plan or (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 448: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 449: branch stubs and trunk only) where feasible (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 449: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 450: guidelines for street tree planting to prioritise (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 450: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 451: 6. Implementing Integrated Water Management and safe to provide much needed habitat for (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 451: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 452: those areas that would benefit most. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 452: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 453: principles such as Water Sensitive Urban our wildlife. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 453: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 454: Design (WSUD) methods where feasible to • Our resourcing only allows us capacity to focus (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 454: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 455: • All of our street trees are now inspected (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 455: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 456: help promote a sustainable tree population on our day-to-day activities, which means we (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 456: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 457: on a 3–5-year rotation so we can undertake (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 457: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 458: “Council has a don’t spend enough time sharing knowledge or (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 458: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 459: 7. Enhancing biodiversity and habitat proactive works to minimise known risks and (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 459: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 460: responsibility to improve integrating our planning schedules with other (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 460: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 461: connectivity through urban areas. maximise the values of our trees. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 461: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 462: the natural environment for council asset teams or external stakeholders (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 462: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 463: residents and make the shire Developer trees are inspected every 3 months in such as utility service maintenance agencies, (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 463: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 464: a greener and more attractive the first 2 years of establishment. the state government or developers. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 464: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 465: • Council has not engaged previously with the (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 465: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 466: biodiversity and helping community around the importance of our (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 466: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 467: mitigate the impacts of urban forest. We recognise we play a lead (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 467: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 468: climate change.” role in educating our residents on the value (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 468: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 469: of the urban forest but also encouraging and (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 469: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 470: incentivising the community to contribute to (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 470: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 471: Community feedback our urban forests. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 471: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 472: 5.4.3 Current Challenges Urban Development Community perceptions of the urban forest Emergency Management (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 472: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 473: Climate Change Our new communities within developing areas Despite an exceptionally positive response Changing climatic conditions and extreme (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 473: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 474: will rely heavily on the public realm to derive to our urban forest community survey which weather events, combined with the challenges (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 474: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 475: Despite our urban forest being one of the most (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 475: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 476: environmental benefits. As a result, we need to encourages council to invest in more trees, there of urbanisation and growing populations, have (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 476: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 477: effective mechanisms for adapting our towns (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 477: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 478: ensure that our new streets and open spaces is still a strong theme of negative community made some of our communities vulnerable (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 478: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 479: to climate change, it is also highly vulnerable to (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 479: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 480: are fit for the future and are creating adequate perceptions towards trees as assessed through to emergencies outside of their control. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 480: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 481: the effects of ever changing climatic conditions. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 481: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 482: ecological benefits such as tree shade, amenity, our community service requests. Common Bushfires, floods and storms have already (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 482: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 483: Certain species, including native to the region, (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 483: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 484: biodiversity corridors, stormwater retention in complaints from our community include: caused significant impacts to some of our (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 484: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 485: will not cope with a warming climate or changes (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 485: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 486: landscapes and good soil. The new Victorian communities in our very recent past, and the (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 486: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 487: in rainfall and wind patterns. The risk of pest • tree risk (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 487: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 488: Planning Authority (VPA) Guidelines include financial and health and wellbeing strain can be (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 488: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 489: and disease incursions increases as our climate • inappropriate species (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 489: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 490: a recommendation to set a 30% mature tree overwhelming. Damage from these events can (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 490: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 491: patterns change, making diversity within our • mess from leaves, branches and bark (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 491: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 492: canopy cover target over the public realm of all be exacerbated by trees or branches. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 492: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 493: new Precinct Structure Plan’s (PSP’s). It is noted • polarisation of attitudes towards native and (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 493: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 494: In planning our future urban forest, we must be (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 494: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 495: We must also face the challenges of extreme however that there are other growing urban native to the regions tree species. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 495: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 496: aware of these potential impacts and minimise (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 496: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 497: weather such as storm events, heatwaves, areas that these guidelines don’t apply to, in Further to this, the impact of the 2009 Black them where possible. As with emergency/disaster (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 497: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 498: bushfires and floods, which all increase the addition to infill development occurring in our Saturday and 2019 bushfires, plus storm recovery planning, reducing the likelihood of (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 498: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 499: vulnerability of our community and our urban established areas. events and flooding has naturally increased impacts involves good planning from all agencies, (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 499: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 500: green spaces. Urban heat causes not only (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 500: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 501: There is a clear and urgent need for council to our community’s awareness of the risk of trees the community and council. This includes: (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 501: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 502: ecological distress for plants and animals but (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 502: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 503: provide clear direction to developers to improve throughout the shire. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 503: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 504: also social vulnerability amongst our community. • Buffering our urban areas from bushland with (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 504: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 505: the compliance of permit conditions to create These issues will always proliferate so any (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 505: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 506: We must consider the risks of bushfires and fire resistant tree species in areas such as rural (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 506: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 507: adequate space to plant trees in public spaces decision making related to the urban forest by (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 507: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 508: floods and how best to plant and select certain interfaces, hospitals, schools and other high- (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 508: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 509: within our developing and emerging communities. council must be backed by evidence, and more (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 509: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 510: species to reduce this risk. risk areas. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 510: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 511: real-life stories which demonstrate benefits. We (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 511: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 512: All of this means that we have to take a forward- • Liaising with authorities such as Fire Rescue (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 512: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 513: also must ensure that our urban forest maintains (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 513: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 514: thinking and asset-based management approach Victoria (FRV) to identify high risk areas (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 514: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 515: asset status in the same way as roads, footpaths, (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 515: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 516: to our urban forest. This includes relying on • Ensuring electrical line clearances are adequate. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 516: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 517: playgrounds and buildings do so we can (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 517: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 518: the key principles of diversity and resilience, (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 518: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 519: appropriately manage known risks. • Assessing and managing large trees in (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 519: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 520: optimising proactive maintenance and renewal, (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 520: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 521: Lastly, we need to better integrate the urban high pedestrian areas and pruning where (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 521: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 522: allocating appropriate funding and continual (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 522: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 523: forest and its management principles into appropriate to minimise hazards. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 523: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 524: our community discussions about addressing • We abide by our Municipal Emergency (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 524: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 525: Council’s Climate Emergency Action Plan is (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 525: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 526: the climate emergency, reducing the impacts Management Plan 2021-2024. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 526: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 527: another key document that will adress current (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 527: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 528: of heatwaves, better planning for emergency (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 528: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 529: and future challenges and work in conjucntion We recognise that emergencies are inevitable, (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 529: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 530: management such as bushfire, improving the (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 530: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 531: with the Urban Forest Strategy to do so. and the following recoveries need to be swift, (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 531: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 532: character and amenity of our townships and (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 532: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 533: which may mean tree removal for access or (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 533: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 534: improving overall health and wellbeing. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 534: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 535: maintaining safety. We will always prioritise (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 535: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 536: There are many positive messages including the community safety (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 536: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 537: promotion and education around risk-benefit and and access. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 537: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 538: undertaking risk-benefit analysis, when it comes (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 538: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 539: to the urban forest, and we need to tell them “Trees are (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 539: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 540: more frequently and through different channels. the most cost- (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 540: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 541: 5.5 Private Trees 5.5.2. What We Can Improve 5.5.3. Challenges for private trees As yet, we don’t have access to data to tell us (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 541: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 542: if we are losing or gaining canopy cover over (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 542: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 543: While currently we have limited local planning A gap analysis has revealed the following key (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 543: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 544: Urban Development time. However, if we look to other Metropolitan (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 544: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 545: controls to protect vegetation on privately opportunities: (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 545: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 546: Our shire is Victoria’s fastest growing municipality. Melbourne Council’s the data is clear: Melbourne (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 546: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 547: owned land, we recognise that there are • We have very limited protection for private is losing more tree canopy cover on private land (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 547: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 548: The state government’s Victoria in Future report (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 548: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 549: opportunities to strengthen these controls trees, through the provisions of the Planning than is being gained in the public realm. Given (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 549: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 550: noted that with an average annual growth rate (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 550: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 551: through implementation of a number of and Environment Act 1987 and Mitchell that our shire does not have planning controls (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 551: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 552: of 4.5% the shire is growing faster than any other (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 552: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 553: upcoming strategic projects, including the Planning Scheme. in place over private realm trees, other than the (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 553: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 554: municipality. Every suburb across the shire will (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 554: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 555: Neighbourhood Character Studies and review state native vegetation provisions and limited (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 555: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 556: • Council has identified the need to update experience growth. While all towns will grow, (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 556: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 557: of the Environmental Strategy. Council has a heritage controls over trees, it is likely to be a (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 557: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 558: its policies. This includes reviewing the Beveridge will experience the most significant (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 558: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 559: key role to play in ensuring adequate planning similar story here. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 559: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 560: Environment Strategy to identify locations of growth over the coming decades. With this (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 560: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 561: mechanisms are in the Planning Scheme to (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 561: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 562: vegetation and environmental significance change comes environmental impacts, including Our community survey suggests there is strong (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 562: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 563: protect and enhance vegetation on private land, (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 563: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 564: to form the basis of future planning scheme tree and other vegetation loss. The area is recognition that private trees are important in (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 564: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 565: provide incentives for residents and developers (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 565: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 566: overlay protections regarding bio links and predominantly rezoned agricultural land and has contributing to the entire urban forest. It also (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 566: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 567: to retain and plant trees on private land and to (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 567: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 568: habitat corridors, etc. This work will also been previously cleared of the great majority of suggests that there is a community appetite for (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 568: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 569: improve the communities understanding of their (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 569: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 570: identify key strategic bio links to integrate with canopy, however there remain stands of trees greater regulation over private trees, plus strong (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 570: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 571: Councils urban forests. that are of significant value. Our community is support for greater incentives and community (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 571: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 572: acutely aware of and concerned about the tree education to improve awareness of the issue. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 572: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 573: 5.5.1. What We’re Doing Well • Council has also recognised and resourced (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 573: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 574: and private open space loss associated with new (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 574: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 575: Planning controls are currently limited, although the preparation of 4 Neighbourhood Character (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 575: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 576: developments. Community Perceptions of private trees (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 576: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 577: we have the following mechanisms and strategies Studies for each of the townships of Kilmore, (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 577: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 578: Wallan, Broadford and Seymour. This important With smaller lot sizes, set backs and reduced While many of our residents value the trees (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 578: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 579: in place to manage and protect trees on private (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 579: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 580: work will look at introducing greater protection back yards in new developments, there is simply within their back and front yards, many don’t. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 580: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 581: for vegetation in residential locations. no room left after the housing has been built for And understandably, some of these trees when (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 581: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 582: • Planning overlays to manage vegetation on trees to be planted on private lots. viewed through a risk lens, particularly in the face (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 582: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 583: private land including: • There is an identified need to set up and of extreme weather events, are seen more as a (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 583: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 584: maintain a significant tree register. This The majority of our urban forest is privately liability than an asset. There is often a disconnect (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 584: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 585: – Vegetation Protection Overlay (VPO) (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 585: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 586: register will enable a list of significant trees owned among residents between the tree in their back (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 586: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 587: – Environmental Sustainability Overlay (ESO) to be assessed for potential vegetation (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 587: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 588: Currently 74% of our municipal area is freehold yard versus the desire for more green space, (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 588: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 589: – Heritage Overlay that stimulate vegetation protection controls. urban cooling and shade. Every tree counts in the (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 589: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 590: land that is privately owned. Crown and council (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 590: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 591: requirements (HO) urban forest and so we have a role in helping our (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 591: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 592: • Assessment of Precinct Structure Plans (PSPs) owned land make up just 12% of our shire. With (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 592: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 593: – Precinct Structure Plans including to ensure priority to provide areas of high 75% of our urban forest on privately owned land, community to better understand and value the (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 593: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 594: vegetation protection requirements. vegetation value on land planned for public the stark reality of how we deliver on our targets benefits that their private trees provide. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 594: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 595: • Planning permit conditions that stipulate use. comes into focus. No amount of tree planting (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 595: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 596: protection of specific vegetation or providing on streets or in parks and reserves will mitigate (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 596: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 597: • Currently there is limited capacity to monitor (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 597: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 598: offsets for lost vegetation. the amount of loss that is likely to be occurring (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 598: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 599: and enforce appropriate controls in a proactive (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 599: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 600: on private land. Therefore, it is essential that all (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 600: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 601: • Working closely with developers to ensure manner. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 601: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 602: private landowners in the shire play a role to grow (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 602: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 603: better outcomes regarding loss of vegetation. • Council recognise that improving education and maintain our urban forest and thereby reap (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 603: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 604: • Incentive programs for residents to plant their and awareness amongst our community about the benefits. “Trees are a (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 604: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 605: own trees. the importance of trees and vegetation on natural, beautiful (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 605: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 606: privately owned land is critical. resource that provide (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 606: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 607: • Council recognises that regulation needs to be (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 607: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 608: supported by incentives to encourage private well as helping decrease (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 608: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 609: landholders to both protect trees and plant our environmental (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 609: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 610: the next generation of the urban forest on their impact.” (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 610: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 611: 6. Our community and the 7. Priority Planting Areas (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 611: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 612: We have prioritised our road and open space The resulting priority roads and open spaces (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 612: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 613: networks to determine where tree planting is in are coloured red and orange in the following (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 613: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 614: We engaged with over 300 members of our • tree removals and lack of space for trees in greatest need. The criteria for prioritisation are maps and these will help inform our annual tree (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 614: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 615: community to understand how our community new developments listed below. planting program. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 615: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 616: feels about the urban forest, their concerns and • poor tree selection or the wrong type of tree (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 616: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 617: where they saw opportunities. being planted on both public and private land (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 617: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 618: Overwhelmingly, the majority of people told us • council is not doing enough to maintain both (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 618: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 619: they want to see more trees planted, maintained, newly planted and established trees (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 619: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 620: and protected on both public and private land. But • poor outcomes for trees under power lines, Less than 10% tree canopy cover Less than 10% tree canopy cover (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 620: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 621: there was a strong emphasis on doing this properly particularly in regard to aesthetic appeal after (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 621: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 622: by planting the right tree in the right place, with pruning. High social vulnerability to heat: young children, High social vulnerability to heat: young children, (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 622: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 623: consideration to surrounding infrastructure (e.g. older lone people, SEIFA disadvantage and older lone people, SEIFA disadvantage and (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 623: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 624: power lines), fire risk, and limb drop. social housing social housing (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 624: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 625: • We Inspect high risk locations and trees on (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 625: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 626: What our community wants us to focus on: (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 626: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 627: a cyclical basis and undertake any works (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 627: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 628: • Ensuring new developments retain large, Urban hotspot Urban hotspot (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 628: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 629: established trees and contribute new trees. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 629: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 630: • We are beginning to plant species of trees (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 630: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 631: No of vacant street tree sites Biodiversity proximity (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 631: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 632: • Growing and maintaining the public urban that are less flammable as per Country Fire (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 632: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 633: High pedestrian activity: contains commercial/ (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 633: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 634: • Supporting and incentivising residents to grow • We only plant eucalypts that are structurally (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 634: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 635: and maintain the urban forest on private land. sound and viable (trees that provide significant (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 635: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 636: • Planting more trees in nature strips, parks, (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 636: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 637: • We are seeking to better protect our trees (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 637: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 638: sports grounds, shopping strips, schools and (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 638: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 639: • We have significantly improved the types of (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 639: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 640: • Native trees that, support local wildlife, (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 640: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 641: species we plant and where we plant them to (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 641: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 642: medium sized trees and those that are resilient (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 642: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 643: • We use a fit for purpose tree asset (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 643: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 644: • More regulatory protection for trees on both management system called Forestree to (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 644: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 645: private and public land. ensure all newly planted trees are recorded, (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 645: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 646: • More education and awareness programs for then watered and established properly. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 646: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 647: residents. • Past decision-making means that some trees (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 647: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 648: under powerlines simply should never have (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 648: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 649: • The opportunity to participate in tree planting (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 649: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 650: been planted. We will be seeking to renew (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 650: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 651: poorly performing species under powerlines to (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 651: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 652: What the community are concerned about: reduce the amount of pruning required. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 652: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 653: • risk associated limb and bark drop At council, we value the significant community (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 653: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 654: • bushfires benefits of our urban forests which includes (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 654: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 655: • gum trees (some people love them but others all of the trees, shrubs and gardens on public (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 655: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 656: believe they are not appropriate in dense and private urban land. We are dedicated to (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 656: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 657: urban areas) managing, protecting and enhancing urban (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 657: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 658: Priority Roads Priority Open Space Priority Roads Priority Open Space (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 658: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 659: Priority Roads Priority Open Space Priority Roads Priority Open Space (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 659: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 660: Priority Roads Priority Open Space Priority Roads Priority Open Space (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 660: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 661: 7.7 Tooborac 7.9 Wallan and Hidden Valley (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 661: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 662: Priority Roads Priority Open Space Priority Roads Priority Open Space its character and (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 662: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 663: 3-5 Medium 3 3-5 Medium 3 suburbs!” (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 663: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 664: Priority Roads Priority Open Space Syd (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 664: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 665: 7.10 Wandong/Heathcote Junction 8. Focus Action Areas for our (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 665: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 666: Priority Roads Priority Open Space Urban Forest (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 666: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 667: 8.1 Tree Planting Themes Shopping or activity streets (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 667: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 668: Should create shaded and cool landscapes (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 668: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 669: Prioritising what we plant and where we plant is (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 669: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 670: that attract people to spend more time in them, (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 670: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 671: pivotal due to the limited resources available to (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 671: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 672: shopping, eating and wandering. Likely to require (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 672: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 673: s Rd deliver these programs. Planting themes are also (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 673: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 674: smaller canopied trees given confinement of (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 674: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 675: required to create consistency throughout the (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 675: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 676: underground and above ground space. Feature or (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 676: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 677: shire, relating to tree planting and the attraction (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 677: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 678: avenue style trees would suit these locations. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 678: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 679: Key opportunities for tree planting include: (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 679: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 680: These should align with the overall township (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 680: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 681: Priority areas theme and seek to support a diversity of species (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 681: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 682: ys Where urban heat, low tree canopy cover and that provide shade and cooling but also support (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 682: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 683: O- high social vulnerability to heat intersect as biodiversity and survive climatic conditions. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 683: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 684: defined in this Strategy. Large and medium (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 684: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 685: Hume Fwy canopy trees will be prioritised for these areas. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 685: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 686: Rd Planted with local native to the region and native (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 686: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 687: ong Town entrances species to enhance ecological outcomes. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 687: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 688: and The shire is fast becoming both a tourist (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 688: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 689: Bro destination and preferred regional living (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 689: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 690: destination and our natural landscapes play These will provide the buffer between natural (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 690: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 691: a significant role in this attraction. Avenues areas and townships. Any species planted here (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 691: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 692: or boulevards of statement or signature large should abide by the CFA tree planting guidelines (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 692: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 693: canopy deciduous trees along our township to reduce bushfire loading and risk. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 693: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 694: entranceways is cost effective and high impact. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 694: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 695: Main feeder and connector streets 22 new community centres will be built to (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 695: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 696: To increase tree canopy and/or support a bio link support the residential housing development (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 696: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 697: through the planting of native to the region trees in the urban growth corridor. Given they will (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 697: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 698: to the region where practical. be neighbourhood hubs supporting the social (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 698: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 699: needs of our communities, it is critical that (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 699: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 700: Main streets any hard infrastructure is supported by tree (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 700: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 701: Which should reflect the current theme of shade, landscaped gardens and permeability to (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 701: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 702: existing townships and seek to make bold maximise cooling and amenity. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 702: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 703: statements through visual appeal and provision (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 703: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 704: of shade with large canopy deciduous trees a (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 704: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 705: focus where practical. Water sensitive urban (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 705: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 706: Rd design would be suited to these locations. This (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 706: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 707: theme should continue into streets feeding into (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 707: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 708: Parks and open spaces In developments 8.2 Tree Protection 5. Improve our capacity to better assess, enforce (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 708: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 709: There are significant opportunities to increase As part of subdivisions and infill development and undertake compliance, including the use (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 709: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 710: Key opportunities for tree protection include: of appropriate fines, where trees have been (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 710: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 711: urban forest cover and species diversity within to provide shade and cooling as well as (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 711: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 712: our open spaces especially along rail trails, creek improved neighbourhood amenity. We should 1. Develop a Significant Tree Register that illegally removed, to ensure our significant (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 712: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 713: lines, around playgrounds, within undeveloped be encouraging each new residential allotment sets the criteria for registering a trees and canopy trees are protected and new (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 713: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 714: open spaces, along drainage reserves and along to have space for 1 mature tree (whether on the significance. Use this register as a basis trees are planted for future resilience as part (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 714: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 715: pedestrian and cycling tracks. There is also street or within the front setback). for further assessment and preparation of of development in both subdivisions infill (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 715: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 716: a strong opportunity for planting to support strategic assessment to support a planning development. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 716: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 717: Industrial areas scheme amendment to introduce Vegetation (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 717: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 718: distinctive urban characters and develop a 6. Refine current tree amenity valuation method (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 718: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 719: community sense of place. Large to medium canopy trees should be planted Protection Overlays for identified significant and build into an asset protection bond for (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 719: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 720: to reduce the heat loading from these areas and trees. trees to better protect street and park trees (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 720: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 721: 2. Review the planning scheme and its potential from development. If the tree is impacted (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 721: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 722: Improve tree canopy cover in new car parks, (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 722: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 723: controls to better protect trees on private or requires removal, Council should seek to (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 723: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 724: whether Council or privately owned or any retrofit (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 724: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 725: property. recoup the full amenity value of that tree. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 725: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 726: or redesign of existing carparks, whether Council (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 726: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 727: or privately owned. Ideally one canopy tree 3. Review the Environment Strategy to identify 7. Ensure areas of high vegetation value are (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 727: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 728: should be planted for every 5 car spaces. locations of significant vegetation and protected within all precinct structure plans (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 728: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 729: environmental values (including bio links) and development plans for all new and (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 729: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 730: to help identify locations for introduction emerging community locations. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 730: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 731: of Environmental Significant Overlays and 8. Develop Urban Development Guidelines to (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 731: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 732: Vegetation Protection Overlays to better support better urban greening outcomes in (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 732: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 733: protect trees on private property. subdivisions for the public realm. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 733: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 734: 4. Continue to develop Neighbourhood 9. Continue to develop Landscape Design (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 734: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 735: Character Studies for Seymour, Wallan, Guidelines for subdivisions to improve (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 735: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 736: Broadford and Kilmore to identify those species selection for future viability, deep soil (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 736: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 737: precincts with tree coverage and support provision and maximisation of tree canopy, (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 737: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 738: tree protection controls to be included in the appropriate placement of underground (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 738: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 739: schedules to residential zones. electrical cables to maximise plantable space. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 739: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 740: This action plan has been fully costed with additional budget implications set out through timeframe (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 740: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 741: periods and funding source opportunities. Based on implementation timeframes of Short (1-3 years), (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 741: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 742: Medium (4-6 years) and Long (7-10 years) to be fully implemented. Assumption have been made (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 742: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 743: that actions with an Ongoing timeframe will have an annual cost to fully implement over the 10 years (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 743: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 744: Actions Timeframe Responsibility Additional Cost Funding Source (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 744: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 745: 1.1 Increase the tree planting program Ongoing Tree $400,000 Subject to (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 745: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 746: to ensure all vacant sites are filled Management annually business (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 746: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 747: by 2033. Estimate 2,000 each year $4,000,000 over case/grant (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 747: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 748: (700 replacement trees and 1,300 10 years opportunities (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 748: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 749: Continue to select climate Ongoing Tree Existing (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 749: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 750: adapted species and plant the Management (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 750: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 751: 1.2 Develop Urban Development Short Strategic $80,000 Subject to (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 751: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 752: Guidelines to support better urban Planning business (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 752: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 753: greening outcomes in subdivisions Urban design case/grant (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 753: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 754: Actions Timeframe Responsibility Additional Cost Funding Source Objective 2 (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 754: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 755: 1.3 Employ a Planning Arborist* Long Statutory $120,000 Subject to Enhance Natural Environment (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 755: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 756: 10 years Actions Timeframe Responsibility Additional Cost Funding Source (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 756: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 757: 2.1 As part of the Environmental Short Environmental $85,000 Subject to grant (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 757: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 758: 1.4 Work with developers to Medium Statutory Existing* Assuming (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 758: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 759: Strategy review and Biodiversity Management opportunities (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 759: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 760: encourage and utilise Urban Planning Planning Arborist (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 760: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 761: Development Guidelines to meet Tree is Employed (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 761: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 762: or even exceed the public realm Management (Action 1.3) (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 762: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 763: 2.2 Develop a bio links enhancement Medium Environment $15,000 Subject to grant (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 763: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 764: and planting program based on Management opportunities (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 764: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 765: 1.5 Work with all developers and Ongoing Statutory Existing * Assuming (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 765: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 766: the directions of the Environment Tree (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 766: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 767: landowners seeking to apply for a Planning Planning Arborist (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 767: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 768: planning permit to achieve better Tree is Employed (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 768: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 769: outcomes for streetscapes and the Management (Action 1.3) (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 769: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 770: urban forest 2.3 Increase the existing tree renewal Ongoing Tree $150,000 Subject to (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 770: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 771: program to also include the Management annually business (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 771: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 772: 1.6 Continue to develop Landscape Landscape Existing replacement trees with a low $1,500,000 over case/grant (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 772: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 773: Design Guidelines for subdivisions Planning Useful Life Expectancy, poor 10 years opportunities (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 773: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 774: to improve species selection health, of poor structure or in an (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 774: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 775: for future viability, deep soil inappropriate location (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 775: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 776: canopy, appropriate placement of 2.4 Identify priority parks and Ongoing Tree $150,000 Subject to (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 776: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 777: underground electrical cables to implement a dedicated parks Management annually business (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 777: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 778: maximise plantable space trees planting program. Develop $1,500,000 over case/grant (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 778: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 779: a prioritised open space planting 10 years opportunities (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 779: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 780: 1.7 Ensure that all submitted Statutory Existing* Assuming plan to determine where and how (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 780: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 781: Landscape Plans show extent of Planning Tree Planning Arborist trees should be planted to meet (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 781: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 782: proposed mature canopy to be Team is Employed the canopy cover targets. Create (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 782: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 783: both protected and planted to (Action 1.3) plans for revegetation works to (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 783: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 784: demonstrate how development include appropriate maintenance. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 784: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 785: over the public realm 2.5 Provide statutory planners with a Short Tree Existing (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 785: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 786: list of noxious weeds and preferred Management (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 786: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 787: 1.8 Ensure all asset renewal and Capital Works Existing* tree species, including species (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 787: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 788: capital works projects seek a net native to the region, to provide to (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 788: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 789: gain in tree canopy cover post development applicants, for public (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 789: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 790: Tree 2.6 Specify a clear definition of Strategic Existing (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 790: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 791: Management “significant” and “canopy” trees Planning (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 791: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 792: for the purpose of exploring Statutory (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 792: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 793: 1.9 Seek to encourage better Medium Strategic Existing* Assuming appropriate protection Planning (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 793: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 794: landscape and tree canopy Planning Planning Arborist mechanisms (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 794: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 795: outcomes for commercial and is Employed Tree (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 795: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 796: industrial developments (Action 1.3) Management (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 796: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 797: 2.7 Develop and implement a Medium Strategic $250,000 Subject to grant (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 797: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 798: Significant Tree Register and Planning opportunities (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 798: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 799: include criteria for including trees Tree (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 799: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 800: Actions Timeframe Responsibility Additional Cost Funding Source Actions Timeframe Responsibility Additional Cost Funding Source (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 800: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 801: 2.8 Implement the Environment Medium Strategic $200,000 Subject to 3.6 Continue to offer Grants for Ongoing Environmental Existing (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 801: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 802: Strategy, Significant Landscape Planning business Plants to participating local Management (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 802: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 803: Study, Neighbourhood Character Environmental case/grant schools (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 803: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 804: Studies and implement Management opportunities (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 804: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 805: appropriate planning overlays 3.7 Continue to provide opportunities Ongoing Tree Existing (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 805: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 806: in the Mitchell Shire Planning for community to discuss ways Management (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 806: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 807: Scheme to protect significant in which they can contribute Environmental (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 807: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 808: vegetation towards the urban forest Management (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 808: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 809: 2.9 In partnership with the community, Ongoing Environmental $15,000 annually Subject to 3.8 Provide customer service officers Tree Existing (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 809: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 810: develop a sustainable garden Management $150,000 over 10 business with scripts in relation to urban Management (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 810: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 811: program, including Gardens years case/grant forest management to both (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 811: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 812: for Wildlife opportunities educate customers but also (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 812: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 813: Objective 3 3.9 Curate local stories of the urban (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 813: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 814: Grow Happy and Healthy Neighbourhoods perspectives (e.g., stories from (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 814: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 815: Actions Timeframe Responsibility Additional Cost Funding Source the perspective of local wildlife). (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 815: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 816: 3.1 Develop Street Tree Planting Long Tree $250,000 Subject to include on website. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 816: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 817: Precinct Plans to map out how Management business (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 817: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 818: and where Council will meet its case/grant Develop a suite of incentives Ongoing Environment $25,000 Subject to (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 818: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 819: targets. This will further inform opportunities to residents to better protect Management annually business (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 819: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 820: the annual tree planting program existing trees and plant new Tree $250,000 over case/grant (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 820: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 821: (action 1.1) ones e.g., free tree giveaways, Management 10 years opportunities (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 821: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 822: 3.2 Ensure Neighbourhood Character Short Strategic Existing arboriculture advice for significant (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 822: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 823: Review includes reference to the Planning or canopy trees (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 823: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 824: and outcomes 3.10 Investigate opportunities Medium Strategic $250,000 Subject to (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 824: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 825: (including advocating to state Planning business (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 825: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 826: 3.3 As part of the implementation Medium Strategic $250,000 Subject to government) to update existing case/grant (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 826: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 827: of strategic work identified in Planning business ResCode (schedules of Clause opportunities (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 827: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 828: action 2.8, Review and update case/grant 54, 55 and 56) of the Mitchell (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 828: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 829: the planning scheme controls to opportunities Planning Scheme to include (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 829: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 830: better protect trees on private requirements for planting canopy (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 830: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 831: property. As part of this, seek to trees in front setbacks and the (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 831: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 832: require replacement plantings provision of deep soil zones (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 832: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 833: or payments for new trees when to retain plantable space such (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 833: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 834: approvals are given to remove any as is done in Merri-Bek, Knox, (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 834: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 835: protected trees covered by these Whitehorse, Banyule and other (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 835: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 836: Restore Avenues of Honour and Ongoing Urban Design $250,000 Subject to (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 836: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 837: develop specified maintenance Tree business (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 837: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 838: schedule for all avenues of Management case/grant (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 838: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 839: 3.5 Seek out partnerships to support Ongoing Environmental Existing (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 839: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 840: more community tree planting Management (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 840: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 841: Objective 4 Actions Timeframe Responsibility Additional Cost Funding Source (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 841: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 842: Leadership in UF Management 4.6 All development applications Ongoing Statutory Existing* Assuming (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 842: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 843: must be accompanied by an Planning Planning (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 843: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 844: Independent Arborist Report that Tree Arborist is (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 844: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 845: Actions Timeframe Responsibility Additional Cost Funding Source explains the proposed impact Management Employed (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 845: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 846: to trees on both private and (Action 1.3) (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 846: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 847: 4.1 Develop a Tree Protection Policy Short Tree Existing public land from development. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 847: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 848: and guidelines and educate all Management Report must go through the (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 848: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 849: council staff and contractors Tree Management Team for (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 849: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 850: 4.7 Resource a dedicated inspecting Ongoing Tree $120,000 Subject to (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 850: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 851: arborist to assist in assessing Management annually business (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 851: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 852: 4.2 Tree planting and protection Ongoing Tree Existing planning applications and case/grant (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 852: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 853: to be included as a planning Management enforcing conditions to protect opportunities (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 853: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 854: consideration in all capital and significant vegetation (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 854: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 855: 4.8 Maintain a preferred panel of Short Tree Existing (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 855: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 856: 4.3 Streamline all tree planting Ongoing Tree Existing consulting arborists who can Management (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 856: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 857: for council through the tree Management assist council when needed (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 857: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 858: 4.9 Develop a Vehicle Cross-Over Medium Strategic Existing (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 858: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 859: 4.4 Council assessment of landscape Ongoing Statutory Existing* Assuming Policy to be included in the Planning (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 859: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 860: plans and functional layout Planning Planning Planning Scheme that provides (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 860: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 861: plans to be conducted together Arborist is the rules around number of and (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 861: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 862: to avoid conflicts that result in Employed width of cross overs in the shire (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 862: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 863: sub-optimal outcomes for canopy (Action 1.3) so as to maximise nature strip (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 863: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 864: trees and other vegetation. planting space for canopy trees. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 864: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 865: 4.10 Improve follow up and Short Strategic Existing* Assuming (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 865: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 866: compliance of replacement Planning Planning (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 866: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 867: trees from infill development. Arborist is (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 867: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 868: 4.5 Create a checklist and set Medium Tree Existing (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 868: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 869: Certificate of occupancy to be Employed (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 869: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 870: of guidelines for council’s Management (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 870: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 871: denied if tree replacement has (Action 1.3) (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 871: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 872: statutory planners to undertake Statutory not occurred (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 872: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 873: 4.11 Enforce Australian standard Ongoing Strategic Existing* Assuming (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 873: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 874: tree stock quality for developers Planning Planning (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 874: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 875: (AS 2303:2018) Tree Stock for Arborist is (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 875: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 876: Landscape Use. Require this as Employed (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 876: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 877: permit condition on landscape (Action 1.3) (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 877: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 878: 4.12 Advocate for increased penalties Tree (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 878: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 879: for the damage or removal of Management (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 879: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 880: vegetation without approvals Statutory (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 880: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 881: Actions Timeframe Responsibility Additional Cost Funding Source 9.1 Action Plan Timeframe Costing (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 881: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 882: 4.13 Integrate all developer tree data Ongoing Tree Existing (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 882: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 883: into Forestree at handover Management (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 883: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 884: Over the 10-year life of this strategy, the full cost of implementing the action plan is $12.390 million. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 884: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 885: 4.14 Collect Open Space tree data Ongoing Tree Existing (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 885: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 886: The below table breaks down cost including annual costs of ’ongoing‘ actions. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 886: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 887: 4.15 Advocate to Ausnet to reconsider Ongoing Landscape Existing Year (timeframe) Additional Cost Implication (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 887: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 888: their offsets from electrical Planning (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 888: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 889: connection joints or get them to 2024-2026 $3,330,000 (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 889: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 890: 4.16 Further develop Council’s Ongoing Environmental 10,000/year over Subject to (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 890: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 891: environmental education Management ten years business 2030-2033 $4,430,000 (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 891: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 892: materials and programs to $100,000 total case/grant (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 892: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 893: raise community awareness opportunities (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 893: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 894: The action plan will be heavily reliant on grant opportunities to achieve a large portion of the actions (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 894: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 895: 4.17 Continue to collaborate Ongoing Strategic Existing within this plan. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 895: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 896: and advocate with the state Planning (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 896: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 897: 4.18 Encourage and partner with Ongoing Environmental Existing (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 897: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 898: other agencies to plant on Management (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 898: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 899: their land: VicTrack, Yarra Valley Tree (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 899: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Urban Forest Strategy evidence 900: Water, Goulburn Valley Water, Management (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Analytical implication 900: this source evidence should be tested for canopy quantity, heat mechanism, governance responsibility, staging dependency or development feasibility (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 1: Mitchell Shire Council acknowledges the (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 1: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 2: support of Sport and Recreation Victoria (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 2: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 3: 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY … 2 APPENDICES (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 3: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 4: 1.1. Study Background … 2 Appendix 1 – Review of background reports and plans (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 4: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 5: Appendix 2 – Learnings from site visits to small-sided facilities (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 5: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 6: 1.2. Site Analysis … 2 Appendix 3 – Beveridge Central Active Open Space Master Plan (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 6: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 7: 1.3. Beveridge Sports Needs Assessment … 3 Appendix 4 – Community facility concept plan (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 7: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 8: Appendix 5 – Reserve cost plan (prepared by Harlock Consulting) (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 8: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 9: 1.4. Master Plan Development … 3 (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 9: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 10: 1.5. Master Plan Key Directions … 4 (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 10: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 11: 2. INTRODUCTION … 9 (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 11: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 12: 2.1. Study Background … 10 (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 12: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 13: 2.2. Study Approach … 10 (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 13: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 14: 3. PLANNING CONTEXT … 11 (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 14: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 15: 3.1. Demographic Characteristics … 11 (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 15: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 16: 3.2. Beveridge Central Precinct Structure Plan 2018 … 12 (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 16: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 17: 3.3. Other Background Reports and Plans … 12 (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 17: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 18: 4. SITE ANALYSIS … 15 (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 18: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 19: 4.1. Land Ownership … 15 (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 19: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 20: 4.2. Planning Zones and Overlays … 15 (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 20: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 21: 4.3. Detailed Site Conditions … 16 (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 21: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 22: 4.4. Site Analysis Plan … 21 (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 22: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 23: 5. BEVERIDGE SPORTS NEEDS ASSESSMENT … 22 (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 23: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 24: 6. BEVERIDGE CENTRAL AOS MASTER PLAN … 23 (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 24: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 25: 6.1. Plan Development … 23 Acknowledgement of Country (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 25: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 26: 6.2. Key Directions … 24 Mitchell Shire Council acknowledges the Taungurung and Wurundjeri Woi (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 26: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 27: Wurrung people as the Traditional Owners of the lands and waterways in the (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 27: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 28: 6.3. Master Plan Costings … 29 area now known as Mitchell Shire. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 28: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 29: We pay our respect to their rich cultures and to Elders, past, present and (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 29: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 30: 6.4. Alignment of Master Plan With Planning Principles … 32 (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 30: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 31: emerging, as well as other Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people who live, (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 31: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 32: 6.5. Gender Impact Assessment … 34 work and play in the area. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 32: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 33: BEVERIDGE CENTRAL ACTIVE OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN – Mitchell Shire Council 1 (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 33: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 34: Figure A – Site location and area required for future traffic works (purple shade) (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 34: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 35: Mitchell Shire is one of Victoria’s fastest growing municipalities. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 35: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 36: Beveridge is located in the Shire’s growth area to the south, and is (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 36: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 37: experiencing rapid and sustained growth. The town’s estimated (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 37: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 38: population in 2024 was 9,120, and it is projected to become Mitchell (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 38: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 39: Shire’s largest population centre by 2046 with forecast growth to (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 39: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 40: Beveridge currently has no sports fields; the only public sporting (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 40: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 41: facilities are at Beveridge Recreation Reserve which comprises two (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 41: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 42: tennis courts with a netball court overlay, and an 18 hole golf course (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 42: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 43: in the adjoining Mandalay Estate. The Beveridge Central Precinct (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 43: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 44: Structure Plan (2019) identifies a site in Beveridge of 6.79 hectares (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 44: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 45: to be developed for active open space (sporting facilities). (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 45: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 46: The Beveridge Central Active Open Space (AOS) Master Plan study (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 46: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 47: was commissioned by the Mitchell Shire Council in March 2024 to (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 47: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 48: The Beveridge Central AOS is located on the corner of Patterson (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 48: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 49: Road and Lithgow Street and comprises three land parcels which (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 49: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 50: are now Council owned. A portion of the site is required for the (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 50: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 51: planned duplication of Patterson Road and expansion of the (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 51: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 52: intersection with Lithgow Street (see the purple shade in the (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 52: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 53: northwest corner of the reserve in Figure A). The total land area (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 53: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 54: A geophysical subsurface investigation was carried out across the (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 54: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 55: required for these future works is 0.32 hectares, leaving the site’s (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 55: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 56: site and found that the depth to Basalt bedrock throughout the (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 56: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 57: total developable area for sport and recreation at 6.47 hectares. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 57: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 58: western section is predominantly within the top half metre, which has (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 58: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 59: the potential to slow excavation and increase costs. The depth to (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 59: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 60: Generally, the site falls from the northwest corner to the southeast (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 60: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 61: bedrock increases to an approximate depth of 2 metres in the (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 61: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 62: corner, with a 6.4 metre drop overall. While this is significant and (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 62: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 63: southwest corner. The presence and location of the shallow (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 63: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 64: slopes vary across the site, it equates to an average grade of 1:60, (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 64: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 65: bedrock has influenced the site master planning process as a (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 65: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 66: and will result in significant earthworks and retaining walls having to (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 66: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 67: strategy to contain construction costs. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 67: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 68: be constructed to accommodate sports facility development. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 68: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 69: BEVERIDGE CENTRAL ACTIVE OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN – Mitchell Shire Council 2 (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 69: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 70: The extent of vegetation varies across the site and reflects its former 7. Car parking. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 70: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 71: rural residential land use. The northern (Lithgow Street) and eastern 8. Shared path network, tree planting, and landscaping. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 71: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 72: boundaries are dominated by exotic windbreak tree planting (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 72: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 73: (Leyland cypress), whilst open grassland is the predominant (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 73: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 74: vegetation throughout the site. 1.4. Master Plan Development (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 74: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 75: A cultural heritage assessment concluded that there are no Key considerations when determining site layout options were as (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 75: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 76: constraints or legislative requirements around the management of follows. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 76: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 77: Aboriginal cultural heritage or historical heritage ahead of any (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 77: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 78: development of the site. Physical Conditions (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 78: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 79: • Gradient change from the northwest corner of the site to the (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 79: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 80: 1.3. Beveridge Sports Needs Assessment southeast corner. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 80: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 81: Beveridge Central AOS is being planned to accommodate soccer • Minimise the need for excavation where the Basalt bedrock was (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 81: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 82: and cricket needs. Tennis was initially identified for inclusion on the at its shallowest. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 82: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 83: site in the Beveridge Central PSP (2019), however, an opportunity • Exclusion of 0.32 hectares from the northwest corner and (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 83: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 84: arose for Council to work with a high performance sports partner to western edge of the site that is required for the future expansion (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 84: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 85: provide additional facilities and services for soccer. This focus on of the Patterson Road & Lithgow Street intersection. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 85: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 86: soccer is consistent with the directions contained in Council’s Draft (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 86: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 87: Open Space Strategy 2024, which has nominated 3 rectangular • Existing provision of trees; there are 86 trees throughout the site (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 87: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 88: pitches and 1 oval (overlaid) for the site. To this end, small-sided plus 21 street trees. The street trees are outside the site (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 88: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 89: soccer pitches are preferred to tennis courts. boundary, and the master plan shows all to be retained. Of the (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 89: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 90: 18 trees assessed by an arborist as being of High Retention (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 90: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 91: Tennis will be catered for in coming years through new facilities Value, six are to be retained. It is not possible to retain all due (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 91: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 92: planned at the two active open spaces identified in the adjacent to the type and layout of the proposed sporting and recreational (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 92: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 93: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan (PSP), and in the longer infrastructure; offset planting is supported throughout the site to (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 93: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 94: term at other active open spaces planned for in other PSPs. help compensate for their loss. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 94: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 95: The primary facilities for inclusion in the Beveridge Central AOS Sport and Recreation (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 95: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 96: master plan are: • Sports facility provision that is compliant with the preferred (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 96: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 97: standards of soccer and cricket peak bodies, including all (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 97: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 98: 1. One enclosed main soccer pitch. facilities having a north-south orientation. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 98: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 99: 2. Two soccer pitches with cricket oval overlay. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 99: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 100: • Reducing the impact of sports lighting, noise and traffic relative (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 100: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 101: 3. Four cricket practice nets. to the location of current and future dwellings abutting the site. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 101: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 102: 4. Four synthetic small-sided soccer pitches. • Location for the community facility to ensure it can appropriately (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 102: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 103: 5. One community facility. and conveniently service the players and spectators using all (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 103: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 104: 6. District level play space with adjoining picnic tables, BBQ and (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 104: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 105: shelter. • Council’s preference that car parking ingress/ egress be from (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 105: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 106: BEVERIDGE CENTRAL ACTIVE OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN – Mitchell Shire Council 3 (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 106: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 107: • Ensuring a welcoming and inviting reserve interface with current proposed strong path network throughout the car park optimises pedestrian (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 107: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 108: and future dwellings abutting the site by maximising the (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 108: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 109: openness of the reserve boundaries along Melaleuca Boulevard (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 109: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 110: • Providing a pedestrian network that maximises the ‘walkability’ (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 110: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 111: • Creating a passive parkland space with social recreation (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 111: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 112: facilities that can be enjoyed by the community concurrent with (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 112: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 113: sporting use, but which also complements the use of the reserve (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 113: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 114: 1.5. Master Plan Key Directions Saltwater Reserve (Point Cook) (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 114: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 115: A draft master plan was placed on public exhibition during the period (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 115: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 116: Council’s Urban Forest Strategy contains a standard of 1 tree per 5 car parks, (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 116: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 117: 21 February to 24 March 2025. The community and stakeholder and whilst the master plan comes close to achieving this standard, it is (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 117: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 118: feedback received contributed to the finalisation of the master plan. constrained by the inability to include tree planting in the space between the (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 118: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 119: car park and the small-sided soccer pitches. No tree planting can be provided (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 119: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 120: The key recommendations for new sporting and recreation facilities along this edge due to the lack space, and the ongoing maintenance and (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 120: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 121: management issues that would be caused by leaf litter on the synthetic (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 121: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 122: and associated infrastructure for the Beveridge Central AOS master surface of the pitches and the likelihood of pitch surface damage from tree (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 122: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 123: plan are listed below, and should be read in conjunction with the root invasion. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 123: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 124: 3 Car and bus passenger drop-off/ pick-up zone (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 124: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 125: 1 Road reserve for future signalised intersection The three drop-off/ pick zones will create efficiencies for traffic movements (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 125: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 126: This land is required for the future duplication of Patterson Road and the during peak usage times, such as sports training times and large events. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 126: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 127: signalisation of the Patterson Road & Lithgow Street intersection. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 127: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 128: 4 Main Soccer Pitch fully enclosed with a perimeter fence (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 128: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 129: 2 Car parking (approx. 200 spaces) with left in/ left out turns at The Main Soccer Pitch will accommodate high performance soccer needs. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 129: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 130: both the Lithgow Street & Patterson Road entrances As a result, it will be constructed with full compliance to the necessary (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 130: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 131: standards including run-off distances, a chain-mesh perimeter fence around (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 131: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 132: The estimated 200 spaces will accommodate the community soccer and (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 132: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 133: the pitch, technical boxes and player shelters, and sports lighting to 500 lux. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 133: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 134: cricket needs. For larger events, a car parking plan will need to be (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 134: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 135: Due to the expected high use of the pitch, and to reduce the period during (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 135: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 136: established that will require car parking options outside the reserve. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 136: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 137: which it would otherwise be unavailable due to maintenance, the pitch will be (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 137: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 138: The left in/ left out sequence is the only option for Patterson Road due to it constructed with a hybrid surface. The combination of natural grass and (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 138: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 139: eventually being a 4 lane road, and for Lithgow Street a right turn into and out reinforcing synthetic fibres will improve durability and increase the stability of (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 139: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 140: of the reserve is not possible due to the close location of the proposed the grass profile. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 140: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 141: expansion of the Patterson Road & Lithgow Street intersection, and the (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 141: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 142: On-ground spectator viewing will be possible on all sides of the pitch, and (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 142: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 143: subsequent slip-lanes and right turning lanes that will be required. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 143: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 144: mounding is proposed to the north and south. There is capacity for temporary (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 144: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 145: An important design inclusion for the car park will be the addition of trees to tiered spectator seating to be erected in sections to the north and northwest of (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 145: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 146: help reduce the ‘heat island effect’ of the bitumen surface, and Water the pitch. The Main Soccer Pitch enclosure will be fenced, in accordance with (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 146: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 147: Sensitive Urban Design for passive irrigation of the trees and other Football Victoria’s standards for high performance venues. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 147: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 148: landscaping that might be included (see precedent image above right). The (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 148: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 149: BEVERIDGE CENTRAL ACTIVE OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN – Mitchell Shire Council 4 (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 149: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 150: 5 Ambulance, maintenance and services vehicle access to the - Separate rooms for media broadcasting and viewing on the first level, (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 150: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 151: Main Soccer Pitch and situated centre pitch. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 151: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 152: Access to the Main Soccer Pitch enclosure for ambulances, and maintenance - Community fitness gymnasium and adjoining program room. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 152: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 153: and service vehicles, will be possible via a double-gate from the adjacent car (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 153: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 154: park. This entry may also be used as a spectator entry on event days. 7 Small-sided soccer pitches assembly area and activation (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 154: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 155: Adjacent to the double-gates and to also permit easy access for waste space for major events (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 155: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 156: management trucks from the car park and internal road, a secure store is The paved area west of the community facility will become an important place (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 156: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 157: located for the storage of bins and skips. of assembly for small-sided soccer pitch users and spectators, and will also (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 157: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 158: be a location that can be activated during events. It is strategically located (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 158: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 159: 6 Community Facility adjacent to the café and separate canteen, and is also directly connected to (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 159: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 160: the main north-south pedestrian path and the east-west pedestrian boulevard. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 160: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 161: The community facility will be shared by all reserve user groups. A concept (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 161: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 162: plan for the building has been prepared and shows it as a two storey building (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 162: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 163: (see precedent image below). Key features of the community facility include: 8 Two banks of 2 synthetic surface small-sided soccer pitches (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 163: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 164: each enclosed with chain-mesh side fencing and roof netting. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 164: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 165: - One main point of entry with adjoining reception, café, administration, Paired pitches divided by a flexible net, and when retracted (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 165: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 166: family room, multi-faith room, and stair & lift access to the first floor. creates a half pitch soccer training facility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 166: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 167: - Separate section for high performance use (change room and amenities, The synthetic small-sided soccer pitches will provide a valuable active (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 167: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 168: coach change room, theatrette and internal store). recreation feature for the reserve, as they can be programmed for team- (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 168: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 169: based competitions. They will be fully enclosed small-sided pitches with (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 169: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 170: - Single access to the Main Soccer Pitch to accommodate home and away (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 170: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 171: floodlighting (see precedent image below). (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 171: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 172: teams and referees, which has capacity for a temporary chain-mesh race (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 172: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 173: to be extended to the pitch surface to facilitate secure entry/ exit to and Each bank of 2 pitches will be flexible; the pitches will be divided by flexible (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 173: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 174: from the pitch by all players and officials. netting, which when retracted will enable the 2 small-sided pitches to be used (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 174: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 175: - Four change rooms and amenities at the southern to service teams as a soccer training facility. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 175: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 176: utilising the 2 soccer pitches and cricket oval. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 176: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 177: - Generous externally accessible stores. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 177: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 178: - Four consulting suites for use by general health and sports medicine (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 178: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 179: - Large community social space with foyer on the first level with external (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 179: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 180: balconies to the south and west to view the 2 soccer pitches, cricket oval (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 180: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 181: and small-sided soccer pitches, and undercover seating for 200 people (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 181: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 182: Enclosed outdoor small-sided soccer pitch (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 182: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 183: Perspective of proposed new Community Facility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 183: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 184: BEVERIDGE CENTRAL ACTIVE OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN – Mitchell Shire Council 5 (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 184: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 185: 9 East-west pedestrian boulevard with bench seating for views The nominated location will minimise the distance that volunteers will have to (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 185: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 186: carry goals, and it is in area that will have least impact on visual amenity for (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 186: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 187: into the small-sided soccer pitches and to the south residents and reserve users. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 187: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 188: This boulevard is expected to be one of the most activated spaces on the 13 Informal open space/ sitting area to view sports fields (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 188: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 189: reserve during midweek evenings and weekends; it will be the ‘go to’ location (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 189: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 190: to view activities on the 2 community soccer pitches and cricket oval, and Proposed that this corner of the reserve be landscaped with some grassed (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 190: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 191: provides access and viewing to all small-sided soccer pitches. The boulevard low mounding and tree plantings to create an alternate sports field vantage (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 191: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 192: will comprise shade planting, bench seating, and public lighting. point and an additional space for passive recreation/ quiet seating. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 192: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 193: 10 Terraced seating and access 14 Enclosed cricket practice nets (4 lanes) (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 193: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 194: to the sports fields A fully enclosed cricket practice facility that retains all cricket balls within the (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 194: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 195: enclosure is recommended as a strategy to enhance player and public safety. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 195: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 196: The terraced seating will be made It will enable the pedestrian paths around the nets to be aligned without the (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 196: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 197: possible from the need to install a need to consider errant cricket balls risking injury to other reserve users (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 197: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 198: retaining wall to facilitate the grade passing near the nets. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 198: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 199: of the reserve and the southern It is recommended that the nets are constructed with the opening to the north (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 199: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 200: section. The resultant terraces will (at the bowlers’ end) to reduce the distance between the opening and the (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 200: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 201: provide spectators with seated views community facility. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 201: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 202: overlooking the southern sports fields. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 202: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 203: The current placement of the nets on the master plan allows for the retention (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 203: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 204: of four existing trees of High Retention Value (refer Figure 5). However, their (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 204: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 205: 11 Two soccer pitches with cricket oval overlay, with low level retention on the west side of the nets will result in shadows being cast across (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 205: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 206: fencing along the eastern and western boundaries, and higher the nets by the setting sun at a time when the nets will be used be used for (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 206: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 207: fencing along the southern boundary for ball trapment club cricket training. Shadowing creates an unsafe environment for batsmen (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 207: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 208: and bowlers (Cricket Australia guidelines reference this issue). A decision on (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 208: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 209: The 2 soccer pitches will accommodate a community soccer program the final location of the nets, and whether all of the trees are retained will (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 209: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 210: throughout the year. The cricket overlay with synthetic centre pitch will need to be further investigated during design development. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 210: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 211: accommodate local cricket needs during summer. As well as these club sport (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 211: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 212: uses, the southern sports fields will accommodate other community sporting (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 212: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 213: uses, such as school soccer and cricket matches, and will be available for 15 District level play space with BBQ, picnic tables and shelter, (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 213: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 214: general recreation use by the broader community when not being used for and one set of AFL goals in the open space to the north (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 214: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 215: organised sport. The reserve will have a (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 215: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 216: A low level chain-mesh fence will complement the tapering retaining wall (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 216: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 217: along the eastern and western sides of the sports fields to help retain (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 217: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 218: wayward soccer and cricket balls within the sports field area. Similarly, a (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 218: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 219: chain-mesh fence will be required along Melaleuca Boulevard with the height (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 219: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 220: of the fence to be increased for approximately 25 metres behind each soccer (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 220: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 221: goal. Gates will be included in all sections of fencing to ensure easy access (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 221: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 222: into and out of the sports field area. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 222: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 223: 12 Secure soccer goal storage compound proximity to public (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 223: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 224: A compound to store soccer goals has two key benefits. Firstly, the soccer toilets. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 224: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 225: club has a secure storage solution onsite for its portable training goals in- The layout of the play space and associated infrastructure on the master plan (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 225: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 226: season, and also for the main soccer goals during summer when they will is concept only. The inclusion of one set of AFL goals in the parkland north of (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 226: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 227: need to be removed to allow cricket oval use. Secondly, the compound the play space will provide local residents with the opportunity to participate in (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 227: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 228: ensures all goals are stored in the one location on the reserve which will informal AFL activities. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 228: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 229: improve the reserve’s overall visual amenity all year round. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 229: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 230: BEVERIDGE CENTRAL ACTIVE OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN – Mitchell Shire Council 6 (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 230: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 231: 16 Ephemeral wetland to control overland stormwater • Construction of an expansive path network to connect all (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 231: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 232: A constructed dam exists at this location in the reserve, the lowest level reserve sub-precincts, to encourage personal exercise and dog (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 232: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 233: across the whole reserve. Through a combination of earthworks and sub- walking, and to facilitate commuters traversing the reserve. The (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 233: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 234: surface drainage, this water body will be re-purposed to have the function of (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 234: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 235: helping to control overland stormwater flow. It will have a secondary benefit specific alignment of all paths will be confirmed during detailed (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 235: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 236: of adding to the diversity of the landscape in this section of the reserve that design development. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 236: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 237: will be the primary public parkland. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 237: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 238: • Installation of street furniture throughout the reserve, particularly (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 238: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 239: The depiction of the wetland on the master plan is indicative; its size, shape, along paths, such as bench seats and bins. The specific (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 239: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 240: location and function will be confirmed during detailed design development. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 240: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 241: locations for park furniture will be confirmed during detailed (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 241: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 242: 17 Future road with potential for angled or parallel car parking design development. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 242: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 243: It is recommended that the design of this future residential road incorporate • Tree planting throughout the reserve (see precedent image (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 243: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 244: angled or parallel car parking along all or some of its length to increase the below). The location of proposed canopy trees on the master (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 244: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 245: available car parking to service reserve users. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 245: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 246: plan are indicative; the specific locations will be confirmed during (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 246: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 247: 18 Underground water tank to capture stormwater for re-use (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 247: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 248: The water tank will collect and store rainwater from the roof of the community • General landscaping and preparation of garden beds as (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 248: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 249: facility to create a sustainable stormwater harvesting opportunity for use in required throughout the reserve, such as along main pathways (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 249: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 250: toilets and for irrigating garden beds. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 250: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 251: and within the paved area between the community facility and (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 251: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 252: Bins, drinking fountains, and bike racks will be installed • Installation of directional and regulatory signage. The type of (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 252: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 253: throughout the reserve sign, the specific information messaging, and the sign locations (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 253: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 254: During the next phases of design development of the reserve, strategic (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 254: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 255: will be confirmed during detailed design development. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 255: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 256: locations for the placement of bins, drinking fountains and bike racks will be (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 256: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 257: identified; the scale of the master plan does not enable these infrastructure (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 257: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 258: The following other recommendations support the full (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 258: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 259: implementation of the master plan, and have been incorporated into (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 259: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 260: • Connection of services, including electrical, water, sewer, fire, (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 260: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 261: • Installation of a fence treatment around the reserve that will (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 261: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 262: prevent any access of unauthorised vehicles. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 262: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 263: • Cultivating all open spaces not developed as sports fields or (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 263: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 264: other infrastructure with grassing, which includes importing top (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 264: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 265: soil and seeding, to ensure an even and thick grass cover to (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 265: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 266: support active and passive general recreational uses. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 266: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 267: BEVERIDGE CENTRAL ACTIVE OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN – Mitchell Shire Council 7 (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 267: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 268: Beveridge Central Active Open Space Master Plan (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 268: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 269: BEVERIDGE CENTRAL ACTIVE OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN – Mitchell Shire Council 8 (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 269: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 270: The Beveridge Central Precinct Structure Plan (PSP) gazetted in This report describes the process undertaken to prepare the (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 270: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 271: 2019 identifies the site for the Beveridge Central Active Open Space Beveridge Central Active Open Space (AOS) Master Plan, including (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 271: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 272: and its development as a sports reserve (see Figure 1). the site analysis, options considered, and a description of the (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 272: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 273: recommended facilities for the reserve. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 273: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 274: Figure 1 – Beveridge Central Active Open Space Site Context (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 274: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 275: BEVERIDGE CENTRAL ACTIVE OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN – Mitchell Shire Council 9 (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 275: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 276: 2.1. Study Background 2.2. Study Approach (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 276: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 277: Mitchell Shire is one of Victoria’s fastest growing municipalities, The study is being undertaken in four stages. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 277: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 278: forecast to reach more than 221,000 people by 2046, an increase of (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 278: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 279: nearly 350%. Beveridge is located in the Shire’s growth area and is STAGE TASKS (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 279: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 280: experiencing rapid and sustained growth. In 2016, Beveridge was (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 280: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 281: one of the Shire’s smaller towns with a population of 1,943; it is now Situation • Review relevant background documents (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 281: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 282: projected to become Mitchell Shire’s largest population centre by Analysis (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 282: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 283: • Site visit to assess existing conditions (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 283: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 284: 2046 with forecast growth to more than 112,000 people. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 284: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 285: Currently, Beveridge has no sporting fields for the current estimated • Engagement with Council staff; confirm study (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 285: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 286: population of 9,000 people. The only public sporting facilities are scope and design inputs (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 286: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 287: two tennis courts with a netball court overlay at Beveridge • Prepare Site Analysis Plan (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 287: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 288: Recreation Reserve, and an 18 hole golf course in the adjoining Site Layout • Liaison with representatives from high (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 288: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 289: Mandalay Estate. The Beveridge Central PSP set aside 6.79 Options performance partner (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 289: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 290: hectares to be developed for active open space. Council has now (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 290: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 291: purchased the three land parcels that make up the site, and has • Research into small-sided football facilities (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 291: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 292: commenced the process to deliver much-needed community and synthetic versus natural turf soccer (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 292: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 293: sporting and recreation facilities. pitches (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 293: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 294: • Prepare and review preliminary reserve (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 294: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 295: The reserve will be developed with the following infrastructure: concept layout plans (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 295: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 296: Development • Prepare initial reserve draft master plan (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 296: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 297: of Draft and community facility floor plan (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 297: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 298: • Two soccer pitches with cricket oval overlay. Master Plan (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 298: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 299: • Review and amend plans to achieve a (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 299: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 300: • Four cricket practice nets. draft master plan (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 300: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 301: • Four synthetic small-sided soccer pitches. • Arrange preliminary capital cost appraisal (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 301: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 302: • Community facility. • Councillor briefing (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 302: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 303: • Play space with adjoining picnic tables, BBQ and shelter. • Endorsed draft plans placed on public (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 303: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 304: • Car parking. exhibition for community and stakeholder (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 304: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 305: • Path network, tree planting, and landscaping. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 305: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 306: Final Master • Prepare draft study report (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 306: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 307: • Collate and review community feedback (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 307: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 308: • Prepare final master plan and study report (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 308: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 309: BEVERIDGE CENTRAL ACTIVE OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN – Mitchell Shire Council 10 (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 309: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 310: The development of the Beveridge Central AOS Master Plan is By 2046, the age profile of Beveridge is projected to be older (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 310: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 311: informed by several planning considerations, including: compared to the population profile in 2021, with an estimated 26.3% (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 311: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 312: of the population to be aged over 50 years. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 312: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 313: 2. Beveridge Central Precinct Structure Plan 2018 (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 313: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 314: 3. Other background reports and plans 58.7% (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 314: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 315: Beveridge is projected to grow from a population of 4,243 in 2021 to (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 315: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 316: 112,187 in 2046, or growth of 2,545% over the 25 year period. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 316: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 317: 112,187 0-4 5 - 39 40 - 49 50 - 59 60+ (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 317: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 318: In 2021, 24.5% of residents in Beveridge were born overseas, (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 318: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 319: compared with 14.7% for all of the Mitchell Shire and 35.7% for all of (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 319: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • Beveridge AOS evidence 320: Greater Melbourne. India represents the largest cohort of overseas (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
  • AOS implication 320: this source evidence affects the urban-forest interface through land take, tree retention, sport layout, carpark shade, cost, staging or growth-area feasibility (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

Gaps Summary

  • Gap: schema file missing from workspace (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Gap: raw Urban Forest Strategy submissions not in matched corpus (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Gap: raw Beveridge Central AOS consultation submissions not in matched corpus (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Gap: open-space and reserve planting sites not yet mapped in source strategy (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Gap: private-land canopy gain/loss trend data unavailable in corpus (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Gap: cost discrepancy between 12.390 million and 11.890 million unresolved (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Gap: final Open Space Strategy adoption status not in matched corpus (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Gap: Beveridge Central PSP source document not in matched corpus (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Gap: current post-2023 canopy remeasurement not in corpus (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
  • Gap: current post-2023 planting delivery and survival data not in corpus (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)