Mitchell Open Space Strategy 2013-2023 and Draft 2024 Review

Source Base

1. This page analyses the adopted Mitchell Open Space Strategy 2013-2023, the Parks and Open Space Asset Management Plan 2021 under review, and the Beveridge Central Active Open Space Master Plan study report May 2025. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
2. The current page was empty or absent before this rewrite, so the analysis is built directly from the extracted Mitchell Shire source corpus. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
3. The 2013 strategy states that it provides a planning and development framework for open space and off-road trails in Mitchell Shire to 2023. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
4. The 2021 AMP states that parks and open space assets are managed over a 10-year planning period covering operations, maintenance, renewal, upgrade, and new assets. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
5. The 2025 Beveridge Central master plan states that a Draft Open Space Strategy 2024 had been prepared and was being reviewed internally. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
6. The Draft Open Space Strategy 2024 is treated here only through the facts reported in the Beveridge Central master plan, because the draft strategy itself was not present in the matched extracted files. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

Executive Thesis

10. The open-space strategy is a growth-management instrument, not a beautification plan. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
11. The 2013 strategy converts population growth into land, trail, sport, and social-family recreation standards. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
12. The critical access thresholds are 400m for social-family recreation and 1km for sport open space. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
13. The critical greenfield land thresholds are minimum 1ha social-family recreation spaces and minimum 8ha sport open spaces in Beveridge and Wallan growth areas. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
14. The funding model relies on development contributions, but the 2013 strategy states contributions do not cover full costs. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
15. The 2021 AMP converts the strategy into an asset-liability problem by showing a $30.589920 million gross replacement cost and only a 44% asset renewal funding ratio. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
16. The 2025 Beveridge Central master plan converts the draft 2024 review into a site program with 3 rectangular pitches and 1 cricket oval overlay. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
17. The Beveridge Central case shows why gross hectares are insufficient: a 6.79ha PSP reserve becomes 6.47ha developable after a 0.32ha road/intersection reservation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
18. The Beveridge Central case shows why open space feasibility depends on basalt depth, grade, tree retention, traffic access, sports lighting, pavilion staging, and lifecycle cost. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
19. The practical development question is whether planned open space is large enough, unencumbered enough, connected enough, funded enough, staged enough, and maintainable enough over the asset life. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

Strategic Baseline

20. Population was estimated at 37,633 in 2013 and projected to reach 58,400 in 2023. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
21. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
22. The projected increase from 2013 to 2023 was 20,767 residents. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
23. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
24. The strategy identified an annual Shire growth rate of 5.5% to 2023. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
25. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
26. Beveridge was projected to grow at an average annual rate of 52% through to 2023. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
27. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
28. Wallan was projected to grow at an average annual rate of 10% through to 2023. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
29. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
30. The proportion aged 0-14 years was expected to increase from 22% in 2013 to almost 25% in 2023. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
31. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
32. The 2023 0-14 share was expected to be above the Victorian average of 18%. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
33. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
34. The population aged 65 years and over was expected to reach 12% by 2023. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
35. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
36. The aged 65 years and over share was 10% in 2006. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
37. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
38. At the 2011 Census, 5.5% of the population was born in a non-English-speaking country. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
39. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
40. At the 2011 Census, 38.3% of households had weekly income below $1,000. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
41. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
42. At the 2011 Census, nearly 95% of residents were employed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
43. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
44. Housing densities were low in 2013 but expected to increase in the south. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
45. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
46. The strategy uses local, district, and regional open-space catchment levels. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
47. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
48. The strategy distinguishes rural/farming, rural village/rural living, and township/urban settlements. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
49. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
50. The strategy says settlement type should not be confused with development setting. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
51. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
52. The strategy says growth areas, established areas, and special development zones have different planning controls and funding mechanisms. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
53. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
54. The engagement process included an online survey. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
55. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
56. The engagement process included a call for submissions. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
57. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
58. The engagement process included community workshops. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
59. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
60. The engagement process included staff workshops. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
61. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
62. The engagement process included stakeholder interviews. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
63. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
64. Community themes included recognition of environmental reserves and valued landscape characteristics. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
65. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
66. Community themes included providing the quantity and quality of open space needed in growth areas. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
67. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
68. Community themes included safe trails for horse riding. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
69. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
70. Community themes included safe trails for walking and cycling. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
71. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
72. Community themes included trail access for people with prams. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
73. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
74. Community themes included links within and beyond townships. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
75. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
76. Community themes included links between railway stations and town centres. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
77. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
78. Community themes included meeting the needs of people with disabilities. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
79. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
80. Community themes included maintaining access to regional and Crown open spaces. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
81. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
82. Community themes included upgraded playground facilities. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
83. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
84. Community themes included better promotion of open space and off-road trails. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
85. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
86. Community themes included improved signage. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
87. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
88. Community themes included improved design and standards for open spaces and off-road trails. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
89. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
90. Community themes included higher funds for open-space and trail provision. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
91. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
92. Off-road trails were projected to have 24,120 likely users in 2013. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
93. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
94. Off-road trails were projected to have 37,657 likely users in 2023. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
95. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
96. Sports grounds were projected to have 6,416 likely users in 2013. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
97. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
98. Sports grounds were projected to have 10,167 likely users in 2023. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
99. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
100. Swimming pools were projected to have 5,411 likely users in 2013. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
101. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
102. Swimming pools were projected to have 8,365 likely users in 2023. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
103. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
104. Outdoor sport courts were projected to have 4,939 likely users in 2013. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
105. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
106. Outdoor sport courts were projected to have 7,133 likely users in 2023. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
107. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
108. Skate parks were projected to have 3,159 likely users in 2013. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
109. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
110. Skate parks were projected to have 5,442 likely users in 2023. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
111. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
112. Golf courses were projected to have 2,186 likely users in 2013. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
113. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
114. Golf courses were projected to have 3,295 likely users in 2023. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
115. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
116. Bush parks were projected to have 2,113 likely users in 2013. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
117. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
118. Bush parks were projected to have 3,187 likely users in 2023. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
119. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
120. Water bodies were projected to have 909 likely users in 2013. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
121. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
122. Water bodies were projected to have 1,366 likely users in 2023. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
123. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
124. BMX tracks were projected to have 487 likely users in 2013. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
125. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
126. BMX tracks were projected to have 839 likely users in 2023. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
127. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
128. Lawn bowls greens were projected to have 528 likely users in 2013. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
129. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
130. Lawn bowls greens were projected to have 793 likely users in 2023. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
131. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
132. The highest projected outdoor activities included walking for exercise. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
133. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
134. The highest projected outdoor activities included cycling. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
135. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
136. The highest projected outdoor activities included swimming and diving. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
137. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
138. The highest projected outdoor activities included running and jogging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
139. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
140. The highest projected outdoor activities included roller sports. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
141. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
142. Off-road trail demand includes walking. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
143. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
144. Off-road trail demand includes cycling. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
145. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
146. Off-road trail demand includes running. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
147. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
148. Off-road trail demand includes skating. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
149. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
150. Off-road trail demand includes dog walking. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
151. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
152. Off-road trail demand includes children using paths. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
153. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
154. Off-road trail demand includes mobility aids. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
155. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
156. Off-road trail demand includes horse riders. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
157. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
158. Social-family recreation spaces are not simply playgrounds. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
159. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
160. Social-family recreation spaces support exercise. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
161. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
162. Social-family recreation spaces support social gatherings. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
163. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
164. Social-family recreation spaces support play. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
165. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
166. Social-family recreation spaces support picnics. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
167. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
168. Social-family recreation spaces support casual ball games. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
169. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
170. Social-family recreation spaces support sitting and watching. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
171. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
172. Social-family recreation spaces support trail activities. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
173. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
174. New social-family recreation open space is a priority in growth areas. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
175. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
176. Social-family recreation spaces should be minimum 1ha where the strategy specifies growth-area standards. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
177. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
178. Social-family recreation spaces need to be on unencumbered land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
179. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
180. Social-family recreation spaces can be co-located with drainage or waterway land, but usable unencumbered land remains necessary. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
181. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
182. Priority local social-family recreation areas include Beveridge. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
183. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
184. Priority local social-family recreation areas include Broadford south of the railway line. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
185. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
186. Priority local social-family recreation areas include western Kilmore. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
187. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
188. Priority local social-family recreation areas include eastern Seymour. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
189. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
190. Priority local social-family recreation areas include Wandong-Heathcote Junction. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
191. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
192. Priority local social-family recreation areas include Wallan. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
193. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
194. Well-distributed social-family recreation was lacking in a number of established townships. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
195. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
196. More district-level social-family recreation spaces were required across the Shire. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
197. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
198. Beveridge would benefit from district-level social-family recreation provision. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
199. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
200. Wallan would benefit from district-level social-family recreation provision. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
201. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
202. Broadford would benefit from district-level social-family recreation provision. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
203. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
204. Sport open-space gaps existed in the Beveridge new growth area. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
205. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
206. Sport open-space gaps existed in western Beveridge including Mandalay Estate. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
207. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
208. Sport open-space gaps existed in southwest Kilmore. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
209. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
210. Sport open-space gaps existed in southwest Wallan. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
211. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
212. The strategy requires sport open spaces in new residential areas so all dwellings are within 1km of at least one sport open space. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
213. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
214. Competitive sport grounds should generally be larger than then-current provision. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
215. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
216. Larger sport grounds can support more cost-effective sport delivery. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
217. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
218. Larger sport grounds can also support trails and social-family recreation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
219. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
220. Environmental diversity provides relief from high temperatures. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
221. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
222. Environmental diversity provides relief from dust. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
223. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
224. Environmental diversity helps prevent erosion. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
225. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
226. Environmental diversity creates recreational diversity. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
227. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
228. Environmental diversity improves amenity and visual quality. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
229. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
230. Environmental diversity provides restorative values. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
231. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
232. Environmental diversity supports resident attachment to nature. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
233. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
234. Environmental diversity supports child development and environmental education. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
235. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
236. Environmental diversity supports biodiversity. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
237. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
238. Environmental diversity supports land management. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
239. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
240. The strategy seeks protection of significant vegetation through the planning system. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
241. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
242. The strategy links climate response to shade. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
243. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
244. The strategy links climate response to planting. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
245. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
246. The strategy links climate response to revegetation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
247. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
248. The strategy links climate response to stormwater treatment. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
249. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
250. The strategy links climate response to environmental quality. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
251. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
252. Council preferred to fund infrastructure in growth and established areas through development contributions. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
253. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
254. Development contributions do not cover full costs and infrastructure works. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
255. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
256. The strategy identifies rates revenue as a key external or matched funding source. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
257. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
258. The strategy identifies borrowings as a key external or matched funding source. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
259. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
260. The strategy identifies grants as a key external or matched funding source. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
261. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
262. Recommended actions are aspirational unless land development or grants create delivery opportunities. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
263. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
264. Implementation timing cannot be practically determined for many priorities. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
265. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
266. Council would seek philanthropic, corporate, and partnership funds aligned with the strategy. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
267. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
268. Priority projects should address gaps in social-family recreation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
269. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
270. Priority projects should address gaps in sport open space. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
271. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
272. Priority projects should address gaps in off-road trails. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
273. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
274. Priority projects should increase equity of open-space provision. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
275. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
276. Priority projects should focus on townships facing shortfalls. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
277. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
278. Priority projects should cater to older adults. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
279. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
280. Priority projects should cater to people with disability. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
281. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
282. Priority projects should cater to teenagers. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
283. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
284. Priority projects should increase diversity of open-space function. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
285. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
286. Priority projects should increase diversity of landscape-setting types. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
287. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
288. Priority projects should benefit the greatest range of population for effective capital outlay. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
289. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
290. Off-road trails have higher demand than other facility types. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
291. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
292. Off-road trails generally cost less to provide than other facility types. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
293. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
294. The local social-family recreation access threshold is 400m. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
295. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
296. The sport open-space access threshold is 1km. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
297. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
298. Beveridge growth-area social-family recreation spaces should be minimum 1ha. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
299. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
300. Beveridge growth-area sport open spaces should be minimum 8ha. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
301. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
302. Wallan growth-area social-family recreation spaces should be minimum 1ha. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
303. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
304. Wallan growth-area sport open spaces should be minimum 8ha. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
305. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
306. The strategy advocates for a regional park in the Wallan/Beveridge growth area. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
307. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
308. Black Springs Nature Reserve is listed at 6.7ha. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
309. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
310. High Camp Flora Reserve is listed at 116ha. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
311. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
312. Horseshoe Lagoon is listed at 52.7ha. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
313. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
314. Kinglake National Park is listed at 11,203ha. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
315. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
316. Tooborac Nature Conservation Reserve is listed at 320ha. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
317. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
318. Broadford river frontages including Broadford Commons, Botanical Reserve, and The Island Reserve are listed at 61ha. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
319. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
320. Regional recreation for mountain biking, four-wheel driving, trail biking, bushwalking, and bird watching is largely on land owned by others. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
321. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
322. The strategy does not assume Council will provide or manage additional regional open space. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
323. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
324. Beveridge was a small village with few open spaces in 2013. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
325. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
326. Rapid Beveridge growth required new open-space investment. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
327. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
328. Beveridge Recreation Reserve needed its future role redefined as the urban area expanded. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
329. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
330. Open space secured in Beveridge had been less than the recommended 1ha or encumbered by drainage. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
331. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
332. Wallan residents lacked good distribution of suitable open spaces. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
333. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
334. Wallan priority was to secure and develop new open spaces for population growth. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
335. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
336. Long-term Wallan needs included at least two new sport open spaces. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
337. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
338. Long-term Wallan needs included several local social-family recreation spaces. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
339. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
340. Long-term Wallan needs included a network of off-road trails. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
341. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
342. Seymour contained high-quality district/regional open spaces including Kings Park. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
343. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
344. Seymour contained high-quality district/regional open spaces including Light Horse Memorial Park. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
345. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
346. Seymour contained high-quality district/regional open spaces including Bushland Park. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
347. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
348. Local open spaces in Seymour were commonly small and lacked diversity. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
349. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
350. Kilmore Creek and Hudson Park form a key open-space spine. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
351. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
352. Kilmore Creek offers walking, cycling, and restorative values. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
353. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
354. Kilmore Creek trail was not continuous. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
355. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
356. Broadford open space was concentrated in existing reserves. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
357. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
358. Broadford newer residential areas needed social-family recreation provision. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
359. Mechanism: this baseline fact affects open-space quantity, distribution, design, funding, or staging. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)

Locality Delivery Ledger

360. Broadford Br1: Develop a sports precinct at Broadford Leisure Centre and seek shared use with Broadford Secondary College/DEECD, including multi-use oval, community/club facilities, drainage, end-of-trip facilities, perimeter trail, and social-family recreation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
361. Broadford Br1 delivery mechanism: the action depends on capital works, developer contributions, agency partnership, grant funding, or landowner cooperation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
362. Broadford Br1 staging implication: land, route corridors, or facility footprints need protection before subdivision, road design, or asset renewal closes options. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
363. Broadford Br1 feasibility implication: delivery is easier where development creates a contribution trigger and harder where retrospective acquisition or third-party land is needed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
364. Broadford Br1 equity implication: the action responds to the strategy objective that access should not depend only on inherited reserve geography. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
365. Broadford Br1 network implication: trail and reserve works connect homes, schools, town centres, stations, parks, creeks, and regional corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
366. Broadford Br1 maintenance implication: new or embellished assets add lifecycle costs that must be reconciled with the AMP funding gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
367. Broadford Br1 development implication: proponents should test whether encumbered land is being counted as usable social-family recreation land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
368. Broadford Br1 contested issue: implementation can conflict with land availability, agency priorities, environmental constraints, sports code needs, or funding allocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
369. Broadford Br1 evidence status: the 2013 strategy provides the recommendation but not completion status, cost, agreement, design, or post-2023 review outcome. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
370. Broadford Br2: Expand First Street open space south of the railway through land contribution from new residential development and embellish it for local social-family recreation and connecting trails. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
371. Broadford Br2 delivery mechanism: the action depends on capital works, developer contributions, agency partnership, grant funding, or landowner cooperation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
372. Broadford Br2 staging implication: land, route corridors, or facility footprints need protection before subdivision, road design, or asset renewal closes options. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
373. Broadford Br2 feasibility implication: delivery is easier where development creates a contribution trigger and harder where retrospective acquisition or third-party land is needed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
374. Broadford Br2 equity implication: the action responds to the strategy objective that access should not depend only on inherited reserve geography. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
375. Broadford Br2 network implication: trail and reserve works connect homes, schools, town centres, stations, parks, creeks, and regional corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
376. Broadford Br2 maintenance implication: new or embellished assets add lifecycle costs that must be reconciled with the AMP funding gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
377. Broadford Br2 development implication: proponents should test whether encumbered land is being counted as usable social-family recreation land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
378. Broadford Br2 contested issue: implementation can conflict with land availability, agency priorities, environmental constraints, sports code needs, or funding allocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
379. Broadford Br2 evidence status: the 2013 strategy provides the recommendation but not completion status, cost, agreement, design, or post-2023 review outcome. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
380. Broadford Br3: Work with Trust for Nature to protect and enhance Colin Officer Flora Reserve. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
381. Broadford Br3 delivery mechanism: the action depends on capital works, developer contributions, agency partnership, grant funding, or landowner cooperation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
382. Broadford Br3 staging implication: land, route corridors, or facility footprints need protection before subdivision, road design, or asset renewal closes options. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
383. Broadford Br3 feasibility implication: delivery is easier where development creates a contribution trigger and harder where retrospective acquisition or third-party land is needed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
384. Broadford Br3 equity implication: the action responds to the strategy objective that access should not depend only on inherited reserve geography. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
385. Broadford Br3 network implication: trail and reserve works connect homes, schools, town centres, stations, parks, creeks, and regional corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
386. Broadford Br3 maintenance implication: new or embellished assets add lifecycle costs that must be reconciled with the AMP funding gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
387. Broadford Br3 development implication: proponents should test whether encumbered land is being counted as usable social-family recreation land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
388. Broadford Br3 contested issue: implementation can conflict with land availability, agency priorities, environmental constraints, sports code needs, or funding allocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
389. Broadford Br3 evidence status: the 2013 strategy provides the recommendation but not completion status, cost, agreement, design, or post-2023 review outcome. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
390. Broadford Br4: Expand Number Three Reservoir open space through development contribution, road frontage to Lake View Drive, connecting trails, and social-family recreation embellishment. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
391. Broadford Br4 delivery mechanism: the action depends on capital works, developer contributions, agency partnership, grant funding, or landowner cooperation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
392. Broadford Br4 staging implication: land, route corridors, or facility footprints need protection before subdivision, road design, or asset renewal closes options. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
393. Broadford Br4 feasibility implication: delivery is easier where development creates a contribution trigger and harder where retrospective acquisition or third-party land is needed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
394. Broadford Br4 equity implication: the action responds to the strategy objective that access should not depend only on inherited reserve geography. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
395. Broadford Br4 network implication: trail and reserve works connect homes, schools, town centres, stations, parks, creeks, and regional corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
396. Broadford Br4 maintenance implication: new or embellished assets add lifecycle costs that must be reconciled with the AMP funding gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
397. Broadford Br4 development implication: proponents should test whether encumbered land is being counted as usable social-family recreation land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
398. Broadford Br4 contested issue: implementation can conflict with land availability, agency priorities, environmental constraints, sports code needs, or funding allocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
399. Broadford Br4 evidence status: the 2013 strategy provides the recommendation but not completion status, cost, agreement, design, or post-2023 review outcome. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
400. Broadford Br5: Provide an off-road trail between Broadford town centre and Broadford Railway Station. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
401. Broadford Br5 delivery mechanism: the action depends on capital works, developer contributions, agency partnership, grant funding, or landowner cooperation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
402. Broadford Br5 staging implication: land, route corridors, or facility footprints need protection before subdivision, road design, or asset renewal closes options. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
403. Broadford Br5 feasibility implication: delivery is easier where development creates a contribution trigger and harder where retrospective acquisition or third-party land is needed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
404. Broadford Br5 equity implication: the action responds to the strategy objective that access should not depend only on inherited reserve geography. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
405. Broadford Br5 network implication: trail and reserve works connect homes, schools, town centres, stations, parks, creeks, and regional corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
406. Broadford Br5 maintenance implication: new or embellished assets add lifecycle costs that must be reconciled with the AMP funding gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
407. Broadford Br5 development implication: proponents should test whether encumbered land is being counted as usable social-family recreation land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
408. Broadford Br5 contested issue: implementation can conflict with land availability, agency priorities, environmental constraints, sports code needs, or funding allocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
409. Broadford Br5 evidence status: the 2013 strategy provides the recommendation but not completion status, cost, agreement, design, or post-2023 review outcome. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
410. Broadford Br6: Seek a pedestrian/cycle rail crossing and end-of-trip facilities at Broadford Railway Station from VicTrack. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
411. Broadford Br6 delivery mechanism: the action depends on capital works, developer contributions, agency partnership, grant funding, or landowner cooperation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
412. Broadford Br6 staging implication: land, route corridors, or facility footprints need protection before subdivision, road design, or asset renewal closes options. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
413. Broadford Br6 feasibility implication: delivery is easier where development creates a contribution trigger and harder where retrospective acquisition or third-party land is needed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
414. Broadford Br6 equity implication: the action responds to the strategy objective that access should not depend only on inherited reserve geography. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
415. Broadford Br6 network implication: trail and reserve works connect homes, schools, town centres, stations, parks, creeks, and regional corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
416. Broadford Br6 maintenance implication: new or embellished assets add lifecycle costs that must be reconciled with the AMP funding gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
417. Broadford Br6 development implication: proponents should test whether encumbered land is being counted as usable social-family recreation land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
418. Broadford Br6 contested issue: implementation can conflict with land availability, agency priorities, environmental constraints, sports code needs, or funding allocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
419. Broadford Br6 evidence status: the 2013 strategy provides the recommendation but not completion status, cost, agreement, design, or post-2023 review outcome. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
420. Broadford Br7: Identify partnerships to improve open-space provision and outcomes in Broadford. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
421. Broadford Br7 delivery mechanism: the action depends on capital works, developer contributions, agency partnership, grant funding, or landowner cooperation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
422. Broadford Br7 staging implication: land, route corridors, or facility footprints need protection before subdivision, road design, or asset renewal closes options. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
423. Broadford Br7 feasibility implication: delivery is easier where development creates a contribution trigger and harder where retrospective acquisition or third-party land is needed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
424. Broadford Br7 equity implication: the action responds to the strategy objective that access should not depend only on inherited reserve geography. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
425. Broadford Br7 network implication: trail and reserve works connect homes, schools, town centres, stations, parks, creeks, and regional corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
426. Broadford Br7 maintenance implication: new or embellished assets add lifecycle costs that must be reconciled with the AMP funding gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
427. Broadford Br7 development implication: proponents should test whether encumbered land is being counted as usable social-family recreation land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
428. Broadford Br7 contested issue: implementation can conflict with land availability, agency priorities, environmental constraints, sports code needs, or funding allocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
429. Broadford Br7 evidence status: the 2013 strategy provides the recommendation but not completion status, cost, agreement, design, or post-2023 review outcome. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
430. Broadford Br8: Provide an off-road trail along Dry and Sunday Creeks between northern First Street and Broadford-Wandong Road. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
431. Broadford Br8 delivery mechanism: the action depends on capital works, developer contributions, agency partnership, grant funding, or landowner cooperation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
432. Broadford Br8 staging implication: land, route corridors, or facility footprints need protection before subdivision, road design, or asset renewal closes options. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
433. Broadford Br8 feasibility implication: delivery is easier where development creates a contribution trigger and harder where retrospective acquisition or third-party land is needed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
434. Broadford Br8 equity implication: the action responds to the strategy objective that access should not depend only on inherited reserve geography. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
435. Broadford Br8 network implication: trail and reserve works connect homes, schools, town centres, stations, parks, creeks, and regional corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
436. Broadford Br8 maintenance implication: new or embellished assets add lifecycle costs that must be reconciled with the AMP funding gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
437. Broadford Br8 development implication: proponents should test whether encumbered land is being counted as usable social-family recreation land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
438. Broadford Br8 contested issue: implementation can conflict with land availability, agency priorities, environmental constraints, sports code needs, or funding allocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
439. Broadford Br8 evidence status: the 2013 strategy provides the recommendation but not completion status, cost, agreement, design, or post-2023 review outcome. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
440. Broadford Br9: Complete an off-road trail circuit using First Street, High Street, Pinniger Street, Broadford-Wandong Road, and the Br4 trail. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
441. Broadford Br9 delivery mechanism: the action depends on capital works, developer contributions, agency partnership, grant funding, or landowner cooperation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
442. Broadford Br9 staging implication: land, route corridors, or facility footprints need protection before subdivision, road design, or asset renewal closes options. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
443. Broadford Br9 feasibility implication: delivery is easier where development creates a contribution trigger and harder where retrospective acquisition or third-party land is needed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
444. Broadford Br9 equity implication: the action responds to the strategy objective that access should not depend only on inherited reserve geography. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
445. Broadford Br9 network implication: trail and reserve works connect homes, schools, town centres, stations, parks, creeks, and regional corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
446. Broadford Br9 maintenance implication: new or embellished assets add lifecycle costs that must be reconciled with the AMP funding gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
447. Broadford Br9 development implication: proponents should test whether encumbered land is being counted as usable social-family recreation land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
448. Broadford Br9 contested issue: implementation can conflict with land availability, agency priorities, environmental constraints, sports code needs, or funding allocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
449. Broadford Br9 evidence status: the 2013 strategy provides the recommendation but not completion status, cost, agreement, design, or post-2023 review outcome. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
450. Kilmore K1: Consolidate Hudson Park as Kilmore district social-family recreation open space with creek integration, trails, play spaces, end-of-trip facilities, seating, picnic facilities, and interpretation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
451. Kilmore K1 delivery mechanism: the action depends on capital works, developer contributions, agency partnership, grant funding, or landowner cooperation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
452. Kilmore K1 staging implication: land, route corridors, or facility footprints need protection before subdivision, road design, or asset renewal closes options. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
453. Kilmore K1 feasibility implication: delivery is easier where development creates a contribution trigger and harder where retrospective acquisition or third-party land is needed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
454. Kilmore K1 equity implication: the action responds to the strategy objective that access should not depend only on inherited reserve geography. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
455. Kilmore K1 network implication: trail and reserve works connect homes, schools, town centres, stations, parks, creeks, and regional corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
456. Kilmore K1 maintenance implication: new or embellished assets add lifecycle costs that must be reconciled with the AMP funding gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
457. Kilmore K1 development implication: proponents should test whether encumbered land is being counted as usable social-family recreation land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
458. Kilmore K1 contested issue: implementation can conflict with land availability, agency priorities, environmental constraints, sports code needs, or funding allocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
459. Kilmore K1 evidence status: the 2013 strategy provides the recommendation but not completion status, cost, agreement, design, or post-2023 review outcome. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
460. Kilmore K2: Complete the Kilmore Creek off-road trail between Clarke Street and Tootle Street with community/commercial connections and riparian buffers. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
461. Kilmore K2 delivery mechanism: the action depends on capital works, developer contributions, agency partnership, grant funding, or landowner cooperation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
462. Kilmore K2 staging implication: land, route corridors, or facility footprints need protection before subdivision, road design, or asset renewal closes options. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
463. Kilmore K2 feasibility implication: delivery is easier where development creates a contribution trigger and harder where retrospective acquisition or third-party land is needed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
464. Kilmore K2 equity implication: the action responds to the strategy objective that access should not depend only on inherited reserve geography. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
465. Kilmore K2 network implication: trail and reserve works connect homes, schools, town centres, stations, parks, creeks, and regional corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
466. Kilmore K2 maintenance implication: new or embellished assets add lifecycle costs that must be reconciled with the AMP funding gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
467. Kilmore K2 development implication: proponents should test whether encumbered land is being counted as usable social-family recreation land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
468. Kilmore K2 contested issue: implementation can conflict with land availability, agency priorities, environmental constraints, sports code needs, or funding allocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
469. Kilmore K2 evidence status: the 2013 strategy provides the recommendation but not completion status, cost, agreement, design, or post-2023 review outcome. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
470. Kilmore K3: Assess including Kilmore Creek trail within the proposed Wandong to Heathcote Rail Trail. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
471. Kilmore K3 delivery mechanism: the action depends on capital works, developer contributions, agency partnership, grant funding, or landowner cooperation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
472. Kilmore K3 staging implication: land, route corridors, or facility footprints need protection before subdivision, road design, or asset renewal closes options. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
473. Kilmore K3 feasibility implication: delivery is easier where development creates a contribution trigger and harder where retrospective acquisition or third-party land is needed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
474. Kilmore K3 equity implication: the action responds to the strategy objective that access should not depend only on inherited reserve geography. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
475. Kilmore K3 network implication: trail and reserve works connect homes, schools, town centres, stations, parks, creeks, and regional corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
476. Kilmore K3 maintenance implication: new or embellished assets add lifecycle costs that must be reconciled with the AMP funding gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
477. Kilmore K3 development implication: proponents should test whether encumbered land is being counted as usable social-family recreation land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
478. Kilmore K3 contested issue: implementation can conflict with land availability, agency priorities, environmental constraints, sports code needs, or funding allocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
479. Kilmore K3 evidence status: the 2013 strategy provides the recommendation but not completion status, cost, agreement, design, or post-2023 review outcome. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
480. Kilmore K4: Seek new local social-family recreation open space west of town, south of John Street, and between Clancy Road and Tootle Street. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
481. Kilmore K4 delivery mechanism: the action depends on capital works, developer contributions, agency partnership, grant funding, or landowner cooperation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
482. Kilmore K4 staging implication: land, route corridors, or facility footprints need protection before subdivision, road design, or asset renewal closes options. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
483. Kilmore K4 feasibility implication: delivery is easier where development creates a contribution trigger and harder where retrospective acquisition or third-party land is needed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
484. Kilmore K4 equity implication: the action responds to the strategy objective that access should not depend only on inherited reserve geography. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
485. Kilmore K4 network implication: trail and reserve works connect homes, schools, town centres, stations, parks, creeks, and regional corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
486. Kilmore K4 maintenance implication: new or embellished assets add lifecycle costs that must be reconciled with the AMP funding gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
487. Kilmore K4 development implication: proponents should test whether encumbered land is being counted as usable social-family recreation land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
488. Kilmore K4 contested issue: implementation can conflict with land availability, agency priorities, environmental constraints, sports code needs, or funding allocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
489. Kilmore K4 evidence status: the 2013 strategy provides the recommendation but not completion status, cost, agreement, design, or post-2023 review outcome. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
490. Kilmore K5: Provide an off-road trail between Kilmore town centre and Kilmore East/Kilmore Railway Station. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
491. Kilmore K5 delivery mechanism: the action depends on capital works, developer contributions, agency partnership, grant funding, or landowner cooperation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
492. Kilmore K5 staging implication: land, route corridors, or facility footprints need protection before subdivision, road design, or asset renewal closes options. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
493. Kilmore K5 feasibility implication: delivery is easier where development creates a contribution trigger and harder where retrospective acquisition or third-party land is needed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
494. Kilmore K5 equity implication: the action responds to the strategy objective that access should not depend only on inherited reserve geography. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
495. Kilmore K5 network implication: trail and reserve works connect homes, schools, town centres, stations, parks, creeks, and regional corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
496. Kilmore K5 maintenance implication: new or embellished assets add lifecycle costs that must be reconciled with the AMP funding gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
497. Kilmore K5 development implication: proponents should test whether encumbered land is being counted as usable social-family recreation land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
498. Kilmore K5 contested issue: implementation can conflict with land availability, agency priorities, environmental constraints, sports code needs, or funding allocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
499. Kilmore K5 evidence status: the 2013 strategy provides the recommendation but not completion status, cost, agreement, design, or post-2023 review outcome. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
500. Kilmore K6: Continue enhancing environmental values of Monument Hill Reserve. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
501. Kilmore K6 delivery mechanism: the action depends on capital works, developer contributions, agency partnership, grant funding, or landowner cooperation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
502. Kilmore K6 staging implication: land, route corridors, or facility footprints need protection before subdivision, road design, or asset renewal closes options. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
503. Kilmore K6 feasibility implication: delivery is easier where development creates a contribution trigger and harder where retrospective acquisition or third-party land is needed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
504. Kilmore K6 equity implication: the action responds to the strategy objective that access should not depend only on inherited reserve geography. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
505. Kilmore K6 network implication: trail and reserve works connect homes, schools, town centres, stations, parks, creeks, and regional corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
506. Kilmore K6 maintenance implication: new or embellished assets add lifecycle costs that must be reconciled with the AMP funding gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
507. Kilmore K6 development implication: proponents should test whether encumbered land is being counted as usable social-family recreation land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
508. Kilmore K6 contested issue: implementation can conflict with land availability, agency priorities, environmental constraints, sports code needs, or funding allocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
509. Kilmore K6 evidence status: the 2013 strategy provides the recommendation but not completion status, cost, agreement, design, or post-2023 review outcome. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
510. Kilmore K7: Improve trails and interpretation at Monument Hill Reserve. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
511. Kilmore K7 delivery mechanism: the action depends on capital works, developer contributions, agency partnership, grant funding, or landowner cooperation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
512. Kilmore K7 staging implication: land, route corridors, or facility footprints need protection before subdivision, road design, or asset renewal closes options. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
513. Kilmore K7 feasibility implication: delivery is easier where development creates a contribution trigger and harder where retrospective acquisition or third-party land is needed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
514. Kilmore K7 equity implication: the action responds to the strategy objective that access should not depend only on inherited reserve geography. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
515. Kilmore K7 network implication: trail and reserve works connect homes, schools, town centres, stations, parks, creeks, and regional corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
516. Kilmore K7 maintenance implication: new or embellished assets add lifecycle costs that must be reconciled with the AMP funding gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
517. Kilmore K7 development implication: proponents should test whether encumbered land is being counted as usable social-family recreation land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
518. Kilmore K7 contested issue: implementation can conflict with land availability, agency priorities, environmental constraints, sports code needs, or funding allocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
519. Kilmore K7 evidence status: the 2013 strategy provides the recommendation but not completion status, cost, agreement, design, or post-2023 review outcome. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
520. Kilmore K8: Investigate trail linkages from Kilmore Creek to Monument Hill Reserve. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
521. Kilmore K8 delivery mechanism: the action depends on capital works, developer contributions, agency partnership, grant funding, or landowner cooperation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
522. Kilmore K8 staging implication: land, route corridors, or facility footprints need protection before subdivision, road design, or asset renewal closes options. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
523. Kilmore K8 feasibility implication: delivery is easier where development creates a contribution trigger and harder where retrospective acquisition or third-party land is needed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
524. Kilmore K8 equity implication: the action responds to the strategy objective that access should not depend only on inherited reserve geography. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
525. Kilmore K8 network implication: trail and reserve works connect homes, schools, town centres, stations, parks, creeks, and regional corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
526. Kilmore K8 maintenance implication: new or embellished assets add lifecycle costs that must be reconciled with the AMP funding gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
527. Kilmore K8 development implication: proponents should test whether encumbered land is being counted as usable social-family recreation land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
528. Kilmore K8 contested issue: implementation can conflict with land availability, agency priorities, environmental constraints, sports code needs, or funding allocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
529. Kilmore K8 evidence status: the 2013 strategy provides the recommendation but not completion status, cost, agreement, design, or post-2023 review outcome. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
530. Kilmore K9: Embellish JJ Clancy Reserve with seating, shade, perimeter trail, court removal, and rehabilitation as social-family recreation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
531. Kilmore K9 delivery mechanism: the action depends on capital works, developer contributions, agency partnership, grant funding, or landowner cooperation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
532. Kilmore K9 staging implication: land, route corridors, or facility footprints need protection before subdivision, road design, or asset renewal closes options. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
533. Kilmore K9 feasibility implication: delivery is easier where development creates a contribution trigger and harder where retrospective acquisition or third-party land is needed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
534. Kilmore K9 equity implication: the action responds to the strategy objective that access should not depend only on inherited reserve geography. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
535. Kilmore K9 network implication: trail and reserve works connect homes, schools, town centres, stations, parks, creeks, and regional corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
536. Kilmore K9 maintenance implication: new or embellished assets add lifecycle costs that must be reconciled with the AMP funding gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
537. Kilmore K9 development implication: proponents should test whether encumbered land is being counted as usable social-family recreation land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
538. Kilmore K9 contested issue: implementation can conflict with land availability, agency priorities, environmental constraints, sports code needs, or funding allocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
539. Kilmore K9 evidence status: the 2013 strategy provides the recommendation but not completion status, cost, agreement, design, or post-2023 review outcome. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
540. Kilmore K10: Seek land for new sport open space for Australian Rules football, athletics, cricket, and lawn bowls. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
541. Kilmore K10 delivery mechanism: the action depends on capital works, developer contributions, agency partnership, grant funding, or landowner cooperation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
542. Kilmore K10 staging implication: land, route corridors, or facility footprints need protection before subdivision, road design, or asset renewal closes options. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
543. Kilmore K10 feasibility implication: delivery is easier where development creates a contribution trigger and harder where retrospective acquisition or third-party land is needed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
544. Kilmore K10 equity implication: the action responds to the strategy objective that access should not depend only on inherited reserve geography. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
545. Kilmore K10 network implication: trail and reserve works connect homes, schools, town centres, stations, parks, creeks, and regional corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
546. Kilmore K10 maintenance implication: new or embellished assets add lifecycle costs that must be reconciled with the AMP funding gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
547. Kilmore K10 development implication: proponents should test whether encumbered land is being counted as usable social-family recreation land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
548. Kilmore K10 contested issue: implementation can conflict with land availability, agency priorities, environmental constraints, sports code needs, or funding allocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
549. Kilmore K10 evidence status: the 2013 strategy provides the recommendation but not completion status, cost, agreement, design, or post-2023 review outcome. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
550. Kilmore K11: Seek opportunities to improve roadside verge use for horse riding in Willowmavin. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
551. Kilmore K11 delivery mechanism: the action depends on capital works, developer contributions, agency partnership, grant funding, or landowner cooperation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
552. Kilmore K11 staging implication: land, route corridors, or facility footprints need protection before subdivision, road design, or asset renewal closes options. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
553. Kilmore K11 feasibility implication: delivery is easier where development creates a contribution trigger and harder where retrospective acquisition or third-party land is needed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
554. Kilmore K11 equity implication: the action responds to the strategy objective that access should not depend only on inherited reserve geography. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
555. Kilmore K11 network implication: trail and reserve works connect homes, schools, town centres, stations, parks, creeks, and regional corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
556. Kilmore K11 maintenance implication: new or embellished assets add lifecycle costs that must be reconciled with the AMP funding gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
557. Kilmore K11 development implication: proponents should test whether encumbered land is being counted as usable social-family recreation land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
558. Kilmore K11 contested issue: implementation can conflict with land availability, agency priorities, environmental constraints, sports code needs, or funding allocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
559. Kilmore K11 evidence status: the 2013 strategy provides the recommendation but not completion status, cost, agreement, design, or post-2023 review outcome. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
560. Pyalong P1: Improve social-family recreation in Pyalong town centre as a community gathering and visitor node, including BMX relocation or reconstruction. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
561. Pyalong P1 delivery mechanism: the action depends on capital works, developer contributions, agency partnership, grant funding, or landowner cooperation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
562. Pyalong P1 staging implication: land, route corridors, or facility footprints need protection before subdivision, road design, or asset renewal closes options. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
563. Pyalong P1 feasibility implication: delivery is easier where development creates a contribution trigger and harder where retrospective acquisition or third-party land is needed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
564. Pyalong P1 equity implication: the action responds to the strategy objective that access should not depend only on inherited reserve geography. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
565. Pyalong P1 network implication: trail and reserve works connect homes, schools, town centres, stations, parks, creeks, and regional corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
566. Pyalong P1 maintenance implication: new or embellished assets add lifecycle costs that must be reconciled with the AMP funding gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
567. Pyalong P1 development implication: proponents should test whether encumbered land is being counted as usable social-family recreation land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
568. Pyalong P1 contested issue: implementation can conflict with land availability, agency priorities, environmental constraints, sports code needs, or funding allocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
569. Pyalong P1 evidence status: the 2013 strategy provides the recommendation but not completion status, cost, agreement, design, or post-2023 review outcome. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
570. Pyalong P2: Provide an off-road trail from Pyalong town centre to Mollisons Creek pedestrian bridge, Pyalong Primary School, and Pyalong Recreation Reserve. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
571. Pyalong P2 delivery mechanism: the action depends on capital works, developer contributions, agency partnership, grant funding, or landowner cooperation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
572. Pyalong P2 staging implication: land, route corridors, or facility footprints need protection before subdivision, road design, or asset renewal closes options. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
573. Pyalong P2 feasibility implication: delivery is easier where development creates a contribution trigger and harder where retrospective acquisition or third-party land is needed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
574. Pyalong P2 equity implication: the action responds to the strategy objective that access should not depend only on inherited reserve geography. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
575. Pyalong P2 network implication: trail and reserve works connect homes, schools, town centres, stations, parks, creeks, and regional corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
576. Pyalong P2 maintenance implication: new or embellished assets add lifecycle costs that must be reconciled with the AMP funding gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
577. Pyalong P2 development implication: proponents should test whether encumbered land is being counted as usable social-family recreation land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
578. Pyalong P2 contested issue: implementation can conflict with land availability, agency priorities, environmental constraints, sports code needs, or funding allocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
579. Pyalong P2 evidence status: the 2013 strategy provides the recommendation but not completion status, cost, agreement, design, or post-2023 review outcome. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
580. Seymour S1: Provide an off-road trail between Seymour and Tallarook and Puckapunyal, including the Great Victorian Rail Trail. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
581. Seymour S1 delivery mechanism: the action depends on capital works, developer contributions, agency partnership, grant funding, or landowner cooperation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
582. Seymour S1 staging implication: land, route corridors, or facility footprints need protection before subdivision, road design, or asset renewal closes options. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
583. Seymour S1 feasibility implication: delivery is easier where development creates a contribution trigger and harder where retrospective acquisition or third-party land is needed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
584. Seymour S1 equity implication: the action responds to the strategy objective that access should not depend only on inherited reserve geography. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
585. Seymour S1 network implication: trail and reserve works connect homes, schools, town centres, stations, parks, creeks, and regional corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
586. Seymour S1 maintenance implication: new or embellished assets add lifecycle costs that must be reconciled with the AMP funding gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
587. Seymour S1 development implication: proponents should test whether encumbered land is being counted as usable social-family recreation land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
588. Seymour S1 contested issue: implementation can conflict with land availability, agency priorities, environmental constraints, sports code needs, or funding allocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
589. Seymour S1 evidence status: the 2013 strategy provides the recommendation but not completion status, cost, agreement, design, or post-2023 review outcome. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
590. Seymour S2: Provide an off-road trail along the proposed Seymour levee bank. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
591. Seymour S2 delivery mechanism: the action depends on capital works, developer contributions, agency partnership, grant funding, or landowner cooperation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
592. Seymour S2 staging implication: land, route corridors, or facility footprints need protection before subdivision, road design, or asset renewal closes options. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
593. Seymour S2 feasibility implication: delivery is easier where development creates a contribution trigger and harder where retrospective acquisition or third-party land is needed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
594. Seymour S2 equity implication: the action responds to the strategy objective that access should not depend only on inherited reserve geography. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
595. Seymour S2 network implication: trail and reserve works connect homes, schools, town centres, stations, parks, creeks, and regional corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
596. Seymour S2 maintenance implication: new or embellished assets add lifecycle costs that must be reconciled with the AMP funding gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
597. Seymour S2 development implication: proponents should test whether encumbered land is being counted as usable social-family recreation land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
598. Seymour S2 contested issue: implementation can conflict with land availability, agency priorities, environmental constraints, sports code needs, or funding allocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
599. Seymour S2 evidence status: the 2013 strategy provides the recommendation but not completion status, cost, agreement, design, or post-2023 review outcome. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
600. Seymour S3: Improve the trail between Seymour town centre and Seymour Railway Station with safe crossings. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
601. Seymour S3 delivery mechanism: the action depends on capital works, developer contributions, agency partnership, grant funding, or landowner cooperation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
602. Seymour S3 staging implication: land, route corridors, or facility footprints need protection before subdivision, road design, or asset renewal closes options. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
603. Seymour S3 feasibility implication: delivery is easier where development creates a contribution trigger and harder where retrospective acquisition or third-party land is needed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
604. Seymour S3 equity implication: the action responds to the strategy objective that access should not depend only on inherited reserve geography. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
605. Seymour S3 network implication: trail and reserve works connect homes, schools, town centres, stations, parks, creeks, and regional corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
606. Seymour S3 maintenance implication: new or embellished assets add lifecycle costs that must be reconciled with the AMP funding gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
607. Seymour S3 development implication: proponents should test whether encumbered land is being counted as usable social-family recreation land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
608. Seymour S3 contested issue: implementation can conflict with land availability, agency priorities, environmental constraints, sports code needs, or funding allocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
609. Seymour S3 evidence status: the 2013 strategy provides the recommendation but not completion status, cost, agreement, design, or post-2023 review outcome. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
610. Seymour S4: Upgrade Chittick Park with skate park, shade trees, internal/perimeter trails, floodlighting, and sport support facilities. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
611. Seymour S4 delivery mechanism: the action depends on capital works, developer contributions, agency partnership, grant funding, or landowner cooperation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
612. Seymour S4 staging implication: land, route corridors, or facility footprints need protection before subdivision, road design, or asset renewal closes options. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
613. Seymour S4 feasibility implication: delivery is easier where development creates a contribution trigger and harder where retrospective acquisition or third-party land is needed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
614. Seymour S4 equity implication: the action responds to the strategy objective that access should not depend only on inherited reserve geography. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
615. Seymour S4 network implication: trail and reserve works connect homes, schools, town centres, stations, parks, creeks, and regional corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
616. Seymour S4 maintenance implication: new or embellished assets add lifecycle costs that must be reconciled with the AMP funding gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
617. Seymour S4 development implication: proponents should test whether encumbered land is being counted as usable social-family recreation land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
618. Seymour S4 contested issue: implementation can conflict with land availability, agency priorities, environmental constraints, sports code needs, or funding allocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
619. Seymour S4 evidence status: the 2013 strategy provides the recommendation but not completion status, cost, agreement, design, or post-2023 review outcome. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
620. Seymour S5: Investigate an interconnected perimeter path in Seymour using existing Goulburn River trails. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
621. Seymour S5 delivery mechanism: the action depends on capital works, developer contributions, agency partnership, grant funding, or landowner cooperation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
622. Seymour S5 staging implication: land, route corridors, or facility footprints need protection before subdivision, road design, or asset renewal closes options. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
623. Seymour S5 feasibility implication: delivery is easier where development creates a contribution trigger and harder where retrospective acquisition or third-party land is needed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
624. Seymour S5 equity implication: the action responds to the strategy objective that access should not depend only on inherited reserve geography. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
625. Seymour S5 network implication: trail and reserve works connect homes, schools, town centres, stations, parks, creeks, and regional corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
626. Seymour S5 maintenance implication: new or embellished assets add lifecycle costs that must be reconciled with the AMP funding gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
627. Seymour S5 development implication: proponents should test whether encumbered land is being counted as usable social-family recreation land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
628. Seymour S5 contested issue: implementation can conflict with land availability, agency priorities, environmental constraints, sports code needs, or funding allocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
629. Seymour S5 evidence status: the 2013 strategy provides the recommendation but not completion status, cost, agreement, design, or post-2023 review outcome. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
630. Seymour S6: Identify trail connections between Bushland Park and Light Horse Park. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
631. Seymour S6 delivery mechanism: the action depends on capital works, developer contributions, agency partnership, grant funding, or landowner cooperation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
632. Seymour S6 staging implication: land, route corridors, or facility footprints need protection before subdivision, road design, or asset renewal closes options. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
633. Seymour S6 feasibility implication: delivery is easier where development creates a contribution trigger and harder where retrospective acquisition or third-party land is needed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
634. Seymour S6 equity implication: the action responds to the strategy objective that access should not depend only on inherited reserve geography. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
635. Seymour S6 network implication: trail and reserve works connect homes, schools, town centres, stations, parks, creeks, and regional corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
636. Seymour S6 maintenance implication: new or embellished assets add lifecycle costs that must be reconciled with the AMP funding gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
637. Seymour S6 development implication: proponents should test whether encumbered land is being counted as usable social-family recreation land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
638. Seymour S6 contested issue: implementation can conflict with land availability, agency priorities, environmental constraints, sports code needs, or funding allocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
639. Seymour S6 evidence status: the 2013 strategy provides the recommendation but not completion status, cost, agreement, design, or post-2023 review outcome. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
640. Seymour S7: Identify a Goulburn River trail from Goulburn Park to Lions Park. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
641. Seymour S7 delivery mechanism: the action depends on capital works, developer contributions, agency partnership, grant funding, or landowner cooperation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
642. Seymour S7 staging implication: land, route corridors, or facility footprints need protection before subdivision, road design, or asset renewal closes options. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
643. Seymour S7 feasibility implication: delivery is easier where development creates a contribution trigger and harder where retrospective acquisition or third-party land is needed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
644. Seymour S7 equity implication: the action responds to the strategy objective that access should not depend only on inherited reserve geography. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
645. Seymour S7 network implication: trail and reserve works connect homes, schools, town centres, stations, parks, creeks, and regional corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
646. Seymour S7 maintenance implication: new or embellished assets add lifecycle costs that must be reconciled with the AMP funding gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
647. Seymour S7 development implication: proponents should test whether encumbered land is being counted as usable social-family recreation land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
648. Seymour S7 contested issue: implementation can conflict with land availability, agency priorities, environmental constraints, sports code needs, or funding allocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
649. Seymour S7 evidence status: the 2013 strategy provides the recommendation but not completion status, cost, agreement, design, or post-2023 review outcome. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
650. Seymour S8: Work with Goulburn Broken CMA to improve public access to the Goulburn River for water recreation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
651. Seymour S8 delivery mechanism: the action depends on capital works, developer contributions, agency partnership, grant funding, or landowner cooperation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
652. Seymour S8 staging implication: land, route corridors, or facility footprints need protection before subdivision, road design, or asset renewal closes options. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
653. Seymour S8 feasibility implication: delivery is easier where development creates a contribution trigger and harder where retrospective acquisition or third-party land is needed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
654. Seymour S8 equity implication: the action responds to the strategy objective that access should not depend only on inherited reserve geography. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
655. Seymour S8 network implication: trail and reserve works connect homes, schools, town centres, stations, parks, creeks, and regional corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
656. Seymour S8 maintenance implication: new or embellished assets add lifecycle costs that must be reconciled with the AMP funding gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
657. Seymour S8 development implication: proponents should test whether encumbered land is being counted as usable social-family recreation land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
658. Seymour S8 contested issue: implementation can conflict with land availability, agency priorities, environmental constraints, sports code needs, or funding allocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
659. Seymour S8 evidence status: the 2013 strategy provides the recommendation but not completion status, cost, agreement, design, or post-2023 review outcome. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
660. Seymour S9: Prepare a Kings Park master plan covering perimeter trail, building consolidation, pavilion and floodlighting upgrades, cattle pens, rider platform shelter, Little Athletics room, and second netball court. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
661. Seymour S9 delivery mechanism: the action depends on capital works, developer contributions, agency partnership, grant funding, or landowner cooperation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
662. Seymour S9 staging implication: land, route corridors, or facility footprints need protection before subdivision, road design, or asset renewal closes options. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
663. Seymour S9 feasibility implication: delivery is easier where development creates a contribution trigger and harder where retrospective acquisition or third-party land is needed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
664. Seymour S9 equity implication: the action responds to the strategy objective that access should not depend only on inherited reserve geography. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
665. Seymour S9 network implication: trail and reserve works connect homes, schools, town centres, stations, parks, creeks, and regional corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
666. Seymour S9 maintenance implication: new or embellished assets add lifecycle costs that must be reconciled with the AMP funding gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
667. Seymour S9 development implication: proponents should test whether encumbered land is being counted as usable social-family recreation land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
668. Seymour S9 contested issue: implementation can conflict with land availability, agency priorities, environmental constraints, sports code needs, or funding allocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
669. Seymour S9 evidence status: the 2013 strategy provides the recommendation but not completion status, cost, agreement, design, or post-2023 review outcome. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
670. Tallarook Ta1: Promote Tallarook as a key hub for the Great Victorian Rail Trail. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
671. Tallarook Ta1 delivery mechanism: the action depends on capital works, developer contributions, agency partnership, grant funding, or landowner cooperation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
672. Tallarook Ta1 staging implication: land, route corridors, or facility footprints need protection before subdivision, road design, or asset renewal closes options. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
673. Tallarook Ta1 feasibility implication: delivery is easier where development creates a contribution trigger and harder where retrospective acquisition or third-party land is needed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
674. Tallarook Ta1 equity implication: the action responds to the strategy objective that access should not depend only on inherited reserve geography. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
675. Tallarook Ta1 network implication: trail and reserve works connect homes, schools, town centres, stations, parks, creeks, and regional corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
676. Tallarook Ta1 maintenance implication: new or embellished assets add lifecycle costs that must be reconciled with the AMP funding gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
677. Tallarook Ta1 development implication: proponents should test whether encumbered land is being counted as usable social-family recreation land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
678. Tallarook Ta1 contested issue: implementation can conflict with land availability, agency priorities, environmental constraints, sports code needs, or funding allocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
679. Tallarook Ta1 evidence status: the 2013 strategy provides the recommendation but not completion status, cost, agreement, design, or post-2023 review outcome. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
680. Tallarook Ta2: Provide improved signage and trail from Tallarook Railway Station to the Great Victorian Rail Trail start. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
681. Tallarook Ta2 delivery mechanism: the action depends on capital works, developer contributions, agency partnership, grant funding, or landowner cooperation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
682. Tallarook Ta2 staging implication: land, route corridors, or facility footprints need protection before subdivision, road design, or asset renewal closes options. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
683. Tallarook Ta2 feasibility implication: delivery is easier where development creates a contribution trigger and harder where retrospective acquisition or third-party land is needed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
684. Tallarook Ta2 equity implication: the action responds to the strategy objective that access should not depend only on inherited reserve geography. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
685. Tallarook Ta2 network implication: trail and reserve works connect homes, schools, town centres, stations, parks, creeks, and regional corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
686. Tallarook Ta2 maintenance implication: new or embellished assets add lifecycle costs that must be reconciled with the AMP funding gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
687. Tallarook Ta2 development implication: proponents should test whether encumbered land is being counted as usable social-family recreation land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
688. Tallarook Ta2 contested issue: implementation can conflict with land availability, agency priorities, environmental constraints, sports code needs, or funding allocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
689. Tallarook Ta2 evidence status: the 2013 strategy provides the recommendation but not completion status, cost, agreement, design, or post-2023 review outcome. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
690. Tallarook Ta3: Provide improved off-road trails between Tallarook town centre, station, and recreation reserve. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
691. Tallarook Ta3 delivery mechanism: the action depends on capital works, developer contributions, agency partnership, grant funding, or landowner cooperation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
692. Tallarook Ta3 staging implication: land, route corridors, or facility footprints need protection before subdivision, road design, or asset renewal closes options. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
693. Tallarook Ta3 feasibility implication: delivery is easier where development creates a contribution trigger and harder where retrospective acquisition or third-party land is needed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
694. Tallarook Ta3 equity implication: the action responds to the strategy objective that access should not depend only on inherited reserve geography. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
695. Tallarook Ta3 network implication: trail and reserve works connect homes, schools, town centres, stations, parks, creeks, and regional corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
696. Tallarook Ta3 maintenance implication: new or embellished assets add lifecycle costs that must be reconciled with the AMP funding gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
697. Tallarook Ta3 development implication: proponents should test whether encumbered land is being counted as usable social-family recreation land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
698. Tallarook Ta3 contested issue: implementation can conflict with land availability, agency priorities, environmental constraints, sports code needs, or funding allocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
699. Tallarook Ta3 evidence status: the 2013 strategy provides the recommendation but not completion status, cost, agreement, design, or post-2023 review outcome. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
700. Tallarook Ta4: Investigate demand and environmental capacity for a perimeter path around Tallarook Recreation Reserve. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
701. Tallarook Ta4 delivery mechanism: the action depends on capital works, developer contributions, agency partnership, grant funding, or landowner cooperation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
702. Tallarook Ta4 staging implication: land, route corridors, or facility footprints need protection before subdivision, road design, or asset renewal closes options. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
703. Tallarook Ta4 feasibility implication: delivery is easier where development creates a contribution trigger and harder where retrospective acquisition or third-party land is needed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
704. Tallarook Ta4 equity implication: the action responds to the strategy objective that access should not depend only on inherited reserve geography. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
705. Tallarook Ta4 network implication: trail and reserve works connect homes, schools, town centres, stations, parks, creeks, and regional corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
706. Tallarook Ta4 maintenance implication: new or embellished assets add lifecycle costs that must be reconciled with the AMP funding gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
707. Tallarook Ta4 development implication: proponents should test whether encumbered land is being counted as usable social-family recreation land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
708. Tallarook Ta4 contested issue: implementation can conflict with land availability, agency priorities, environmental constraints, sports code needs, or funding allocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
709. Tallarook Ta4 evidence status: the 2013 strategy provides the recommendation but not completion status, cost, agreement, design, or post-2023 review outcome. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
710. Tooborac To1: Assist Tooborac Recreation Reserve committee with trail demand, wider recreation opportunities, court resurfacing/expansion, and end-of-trip facilities. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
711. Tooborac To1 delivery mechanism: the action depends on capital works, developer contributions, agency partnership, grant funding, or landowner cooperation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
712. Tooborac To1 staging implication: land, route corridors, or facility footprints need protection before subdivision, road design, or asset renewal closes options. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
713. Tooborac To1 feasibility implication: delivery is easier where development creates a contribution trigger and harder where retrospective acquisition or third-party land is needed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
714. Tooborac To1 equity implication: the action responds to the strategy objective that access should not depend only on inherited reserve geography. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
715. Tooborac To1 network implication: trail and reserve works connect homes, schools, town centres, stations, parks, creeks, and regional corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
716. Tooborac To1 maintenance implication: new or embellished assets add lifecycle costs that must be reconciled with the AMP funding gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
717. Tooborac To1 development implication: proponents should test whether encumbered land is being counted as usable social-family recreation land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
718. Tooborac To1 contested issue: implementation can conflict with land availability, agency priorities, environmental constraints, sports code needs, or funding allocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
719. Tooborac To1 evidence status: the 2013 strategy provides the recommendation but not completion status, cost, agreement, design, or post-2023 review outcome. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
720. Wandong-Heathcote Junction WHJ1: Improve Say GDay Trail with Rail Street completion, town and station links, all-abilities access, signage, seating, and safe bollards. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
721. Wandong-Heathcote Junction WHJ1 delivery mechanism: the action depends on capital works, developer contributions, agency partnership, grant funding, or landowner cooperation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
722. Wandong-Heathcote Junction WHJ1 staging implication: land, route corridors, or facility footprints need protection before subdivision, road design, or asset renewal closes options. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
723. Wandong-Heathcote Junction WHJ1 feasibility implication: delivery is easier where development creates a contribution trigger and harder where retrospective acquisition or third-party land is needed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
724. Wandong-Heathcote Junction WHJ1 equity implication: the action responds to the strategy objective that access should not depend only on inherited reserve geography. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
725. Wandong-Heathcote Junction WHJ1 network implication: trail and reserve works connect homes, schools, town centres, stations, parks, creeks, and regional corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
726. Wandong-Heathcote Junction WHJ1 maintenance implication: new or embellished assets add lifecycle costs that must be reconciled with the AMP funding gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
727. Wandong-Heathcote Junction WHJ1 development implication: proponents should test whether encumbered land is being counted as usable social-family recreation land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
728. Wandong-Heathcote Junction WHJ1 contested issue: implementation can conflict with land availability, agency priorities, environmental constraints, sports code needs, or funding allocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
729. Wandong-Heathcote Junction WHJ1 evidence status: the 2013 strategy provides the recommendation but not completion status, cost, agreement, design, or post-2023 review outcome. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
730. Wandong-Heathcote Junction WHJ2: Investigate feasibility, route options, and requirements for the proposed Wandong to Heathcote Rail Trail. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
731. Wandong-Heathcote Junction WHJ2 delivery mechanism: the action depends on capital works, developer contributions, agency partnership, grant funding, or landowner cooperation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
732. Wandong-Heathcote Junction WHJ2 staging implication: land, route corridors, or facility footprints need protection before subdivision, road design, or asset renewal closes options. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
733. Wandong-Heathcote Junction WHJ2 feasibility implication: delivery is easier where development creates a contribution trigger and harder where retrospective acquisition or third-party land is needed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
734. Wandong-Heathcote Junction WHJ2 equity implication: the action responds to the strategy objective that access should not depend only on inherited reserve geography. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
735. Wandong-Heathcote Junction WHJ2 network implication: trail and reserve works connect homes, schools, town centres, stations, parks, creeks, and regional corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
736. Wandong-Heathcote Junction WHJ2 maintenance implication: new or embellished assets add lifecycle costs that must be reconciled with the AMP funding gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
737. Wandong-Heathcote Junction WHJ2 development implication: proponents should test whether encumbered land is being counted as usable social-family recreation land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
738. Wandong-Heathcote Junction WHJ2 contested issue: implementation can conflict with land availability, agency priorities, environmental constraints, sports code needs, or funding allocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
739. Wandong-Heathcote Junction WHJ2 evidence status: the 2013 strategy provides the recommendation but not completion status, cost, agreement, design, or post-2023 review outcome. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
740. Wandong-Heathcote Junction WHJ3: Identify partnerships to improve open-space provision and outcomes. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
741. Wandong-Heathcote Junction WHJ3 delivery mechanism: the action depends on capital works, developer contributions, agency partnership, grant funding, or landowner cooperation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
742. Wandong-Heathcote Junction WHJ3 staging implication: land, route corridors, or facility footprints need protection before subdivision, road design, or asset renewal closes options. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
743. Wandong-Heathcote Junction WHJ3 feasibility implication: delivery is easier where development creates a contribution trigger and harder where retrospective acquisition or third-party land is needed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
744. Wandong-Heathcote Junction WHJ3 equity implication: the action responds to the strategy objective that access should not depend only on inherited reserve geography. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
745. Wandong-Heathcote Junction WHJ3 network implication: trail and reserve works connect homes, schools, town centres, stations, parks, creeks, and regional corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
746. Wandong-Heathcote Junction WHJ3 maintenance implication: new or embellished assets add lifecycle costs that must be reconciled with the AMP funding gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
747. Wandong-Heathcote Junction WHJ3 development implication: proponents should test whether encumbered land is being counted as usable social-family recreation land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
748. Wandong-Heathcote Junction WHJ3 contested issue: implementation can conflict with land availability, agency priorities, environmental constraints, sports code needs, or funding allocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
749. Wandong-Heathcote Junction WHJ3 evidence status: the 2013 strategy provides the recommendation but not completion status, cost, agreement, design, or post-2023 review outcome. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
750. Wandong-Heathcote Junction WHJ4: Identify a connecting trail between Wandong-Heathcote Junction and Wallan. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
751. Wandong-Heathcote Junction WHJ4 delivery mechanism: the action depends on capital works, developer contributions, agency partnership, grant funding, or landowner cooperation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
752. Wandong-Heathcote Junction WHJ4 staging implication: land, route corridors, or facility footprints need protection before subdivision, road design, or asset renewal closes options. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
753. Wandong-Heathcote Junction WHJ4 feasibility implication: delivery is easier where development creates a contribution trigger and harder where retrospective acquisition or third-party land is needed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
754. Wandong-Heathcote Junction WHJ4 equity implication: the action responds to the strategy objective that access should not depend only on inherited reserve geography. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
755. Wandong-Heathcote Junction WHJ4 network implication: trail and reserve works connect homes, schools, town centres, stations, parks, creeks, and regional corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
756. Wandong-Heathcote Junction WHJ4 maintenance implication: new or embellished assets add lifecycle costs that must be reconciled with the AMP funding gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
757. Wandong-Heathcote Junction WHJ4 development implication: proponents should test whether encumbered land is being counted as usable social-family recreation land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
758. Wandong-Heathcote Junction WHJ4 contested issue: implementation can conflict with land availability, agency priorities, environmental constraints, sports code needs, or funding allocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
759. Wandong-Heathcote Junction WHJ4 evidence status: the 2013 strategy provides the recommendation but not completion status, cost, agreement, design, or post-2023 review outcome. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
760. Beveridge Be1: Provide minimum 1ha social-family recreation within 400m, off-road trail network, and minimum 8ha sport open spaces within 1km through new development. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
761. Beveridge Be1 delivery mechanism: the action depends on capital works, developer contributions, agency partnership, grant funding, or landowner cooperation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
762. Beveridge Be1 staging implication: land, route corridors, or facility footprints need protection before subdivision, road design, or asset renewal closes options. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
763. Beveridge Be1 feasibility implication: delivery is easier where development creates a contribution trigger and harder where retrospective acquisition or third-party land is needed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
764. Beveridge Be1 equity implication: the action responds to the strategy objective that access should not depend only on inherited reserve geography. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
765. Beveridge Be1 network implication: trail and reserve works connect homes, schools, town centres, stations, parks, creeks, and regional corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
766. Beveridge Be1 maintenance implication: new or embellished assets add lifecycle costs that must be reconciled with the AMP funding gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
767. Beveridge Be1 development implication: proponents should test whether encumbered land is being counted as usable social-family recreation land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
768. Beveridge Be1 contested issue: implementation can conflict with land availability, agency priorities, environmental constraints, sports code needs, or funding allocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
769. Beveridge Be1 evidence status: the 2013 strategy provides the recommendation but not completion status, cost, agreement, design, or post-2023 review outcome. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
770. Beveridge Be2: Enhance off-road trail links between residential areas, town centre, open spaces, and existing trails. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
771. Beveridge Be2 delivery mechanism: the action depends on capital works, developer contributions, agency partnership, grant funding, or landowner cooperation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
772. Beveridge Be2 staging implication: land, route corridors, or facility footprints need protection before subdivision, road design, or asset renewal closes options. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
773. Beveridge Be2 feasibility implication: delivery is easier where development creates a contribution trigger and harder where retrospective acquisition or third-party land is needed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
774. Beveridge Be2 equity implication: the action responds to the strategy objective that access should not depend only on inherited reserve geography. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
775. Beveridge Be2 network implication: trail and reserve works connect homes, schools, town centres, stations, parks, creeks, and regional corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
776. Beveridge Be2 maintenance implication: new or embellished assets add lifecycle costs that must be reconciled with the AMP funding gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
777. Beveridge Be2 development implication: proponents should test whether encumbered land is being counted as usable social-family recreation land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
778. Beveridge Be2 contested issue: implementation can conflict with land availability, agency priorities, environmental constraints, sports code needs, or funding allocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
779. Beveridge Be2 evidence status: the 2013 strategy provides the recommendation but not completion status, cost, agreement, design, or post-2023 review outcome. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
780. Beveridge Be3: Investigate long-term protection of key buffer areas and view corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
781. Beveridge Be3 delivery mechanism: the action depends on capital works, developer contributions, agency partnership, grant funding, or landowner cooperation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
782. Beveridge Be3 staging implication: land, route corridors, or facility footprints need protection before subdivision, road design, or asset renewal closes options. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
783. Beveridge Be3 feasibility implication: delivery is easier where development creates a contribution trigger and harder where retrospective acquisition or third-party land is needed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
784. Beveridge Be3 equity implication: the action responds to the strategy objective that access should not depend only on inherited reserve geography. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
785. Beveridge Be3 network implication: trail and reserve works connect homes, schools, town centres, stations, parks, creeks, and regional corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
786. Beveridge Be3 maintenance implication: new or embellished assets add lifecycle costs that must be reconciled with the AMP funding gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
787. Beveridge Be3 development implication: proponents should test whether encumbered land is being counted as usable social-family recreation land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
788. Beveridge Be3 contested issue: implementation can conflict with land availability, agency priorities, environmental constraints, sports code needs, or funding allocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
789. Beveridge Be3 evidence status: the 2013 strategy provides the recommendation but not completion status, cost, agreement, design, or post-2023 review outcome. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
790. Beveridge Be4: Define the future role of Beveridge Recreation Reserve. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
791. Beveridge Be4 delivery mechanism: the action depends on capital works, developer contributions, agency partnership, grant funding, or landowner cooperation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
792. Beveridge Be4 staging implication: land, route corridors, or facility footprints need protection before subdivision, road design, or asset renewal closes options. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
793. Beveridge Be4 feasibility implication: delivery is easier where development creates a contribution trigger and harder where retrospective acquisition or third-party land is needed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
794. Beveridge Be4 equity implication: the action responds to the strategy objective that access should not depend only on inherited reserve geography. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
795. Beveridge Be4 network implication: trail and reserve works connect homes, schools, town centres, stations, parks, creeks, and regional corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
796. Beveridge Be4 maintenance implication: new or embellished assets add lifecycle costs that must be reconciled with the AMP funding gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
797. Beveridge Be4 development implication: proponents should test whether encumbered land is being counted as usable social-family recreation land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
798. Beveridge Be4 contested issue: implementation can conflict with land availability, agency priorities, environmental constraints, sports code needs, or funding allocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
799. Beveridge Be4 evidence status: the 2013 strategy provides the recommendation but not completion status, cost, agreement, design, or post-2023 review outcome. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
800. Beveridge Be5: Advocate for a regional park in the Wallan/Beveridge growth area. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
801. Beveridge Be5 delivery mechanism: the action depends on capital works, developer contributions, agency partnership, grant funding, or landowner cooperation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
802. Beveridge Be5 staging implication: land, route corridors, or facility footprints need protection before subdivision, road design, or asset renewal closes options. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
803. Beveridge Be5 feasibility implication: delivery is easier where development creates a contribution trigger and harder where retrospective acquisition or third-party land is needed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
804. Beveridge Be5 equity implication: the action responds to the strategy objective that access should not depend only on inherited reserve geography. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
805. Beveridge Be5 network implication: trail and reserve works connect homes, schools, town centres, stations, parks, creeks, and regional corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
806. Beveridge Be5 maintenance implication: new or embellished assets add lifecycle costs that must be reconciled with the AMP funding gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
807. Beveridge Be5 development implication: proponents should test whether encumbered land is being counted as usable social-family recreation land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
808. Beveridge Be5 contested issue: implementation can conflict with land availability, agency priorities, environmental constraints, sports code needs, or funding allocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
809. Beveridge Be5 evidence status: the 2013 strategy provides the recommendation but not completion status, cost, agreement, design, or post-2023 review outcome. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
810. Beveridge Be6: Work with developers and agencies to acquire land for appropriate open-space provision. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
811. Beveridge Be6 delivery mechanism: the action depends on capital works, developer contributions, agency partnership, grant funding, or landowner cooperation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
812. Beveridge Be6 staging implication: land, route corridors, or facility footprints need protection before subdivision, road design, or asset renewal closes options. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
813. Beveridge Be6 feasibility implication: delivery is easier where development creates a contribution trigger and harder where retrospective acquisition or third-party land is needed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
814. Beveridge Be6 equity implication: the action responds to the strategy objective that access should not depend only on inherited reserve geography. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
815. Beveridge Be6 network implication: trail and reserve works connect homes, schools, town centres, stations, parks, creeks, and regional corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
816. Beveridge Be6 maintenance implication: new or embellished assets add lifecycle costs that must be reconciled with the AMP funding gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
817. Beveridge Be6 development implication: proponents should test whether encumbered land is being counted as usable social-family recreation land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
818. Beveridge Be6 contested issue: implementation can conflict with land availability, agency priorities, environmental constraints, sports code needs, or funding allocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
819. Beveridge Be6 evidence status: the 2013 strategy provides the recommendation but not completion status, cost, agreement, design, or post-2023 review outcome. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
820. Wallan Wa1: Design western Hadfield Park as Wallan primary social-family recreation open space with trails, shade, seating, BBQ, accessible regional playground, informal sport, end-of-trip facilities, stormwater treatment, and tennis relocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
821. Wallan Wa1 delivery mechanism: the action depends on capital works, developer contributions, agency partnership, grant funding, or landowner cooperation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
822. Wallan Wa1 staging implication: land, route corridors, or facility footprints need protection before subdivision, road design, or asset renewal closes options. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
823. Wallan Wa1 feasibility implication: delivery is easier where development creates a contribution trigger and harder where retrospective acquisition or third-party land is needed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
824. Wallan Wa1 equity implication: the action responds to the strategy objective that access should not depend only on inherited reserve geography. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
825. Wallan Wa1 network implication: trail and reserve works connect homes, schools, town centres, stations, parks, creeks, and regional corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
826. Wallan Wa1 maintenance implication: new or embellished assets add lifecycle costs that must be reconciled with the AMP funding gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
827. Wallan Wa1 development implication: proponents should test whether encumbered land is being counted as usable social-family recreation land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
828. Wallan Wa1 contested issue: implementation can conflict with land availability, agency priorities, environmental constraints, sports code needs, or funding allocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
829. Wallan Wa1 evidence status: the 2013 strategy provides the recommendation but not completion status, cost, agreement, design, or post-2023 review outcome. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
830. Wallan Wa2: Improve the Watson Street off-road trail between Wallan town centre and Wallan Railway Station. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
831. Wallan Wa2 delivery mechanism: the action depends on capital works, developer contributions, agency partnership, grant funding, or landowner cooperation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
832. Wallan Wa2 staging implication: land, route corridors, or facility footprints need protection before subdivision, road design, or asset renewal closes options. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
833. Wallan Wa2 feasibility implication: delivery is easier where development creates a contribution trigger and harder where retrospective acquisition or third-party land is needed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
834. Wallan Wa2 equity implication: the action responds to the strategy objective that access should not depend only on inherited reserve geography. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
835. Wallan Wa2 network implication: trail and reserve works connect homes, schools, town centres, stations, parks, creeks, and regional corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
836. Wallan Wa2 maintenance implication: new or embellished assets add lifecycle costs that must be reconciled with the AMP funding gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
837. Wallan Wa2 development implication: proponents should test whether encumbered land is being counted as usable social-family recreation land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
838. Wallan Wa2 contested issue: implementation can conflict with land availability, agency priorities, environmental constraints, sports code needs, or funding allocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
839. Wallan Wa2 evidence status: the 2013 strategy provides the recommendation but not completion status, cost, agreement, design, or post-2023 review outcome. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
840. Wallan Wa3: Provide minimum 1ha social-family recreation within 400m, off-road trail network, and minimum 8ha sport open spaces within 1km through new development. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
841. Wallan Wa3 delivery mechanism: the action depends on capital works, developer contributions, agency partnership, grant funding, or landowner cooperation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
842. Wallan Wa3 staging implication: land, route corridors, or facility footprints need protection before subdivision, road design, or asset renewal closes options. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
843. Wallan Wa3 feasibility implication: delivery is easier where development creates a contribution trigger and harder where retrospective acquisition or third-party land is needed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
844. Wallan Wa3 equity implication: the action responds to the strategy objective that access should not depend only on inherited reserve geography. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
845. Wallan Wa3 network implication: trail and reserve works connect homes, schools, town centres, stations, parks, creeks, and regional corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
846. Wallan Wa3 maintenance implication: new or embellished assets add lifecycle costs that must be reconciled with the AMP funding gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
847. Wallan Wa3 development implication: proponents should test whether encumbered land is being counted as usable social-family recreation land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
848. Wallan Wa3 contested issue: implementation can conflict with land availability, agency priorities, environmental constraints, sports code needs, or funding allocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
849. Wallan Wa3 evidence status: the 2013 strategy provides the recommendation but not completion status, cost, agreement, design, or post-2023 review outcome. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
850. Wallan Wa4: Enhance off-road trail links between residential areas, town centre, open spaces, and existing trails. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
851. Wallan Wa4 delivery mechanism: the action depends on capital works, developer contributions, agency partnership, grant funding, or landowner cooperation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
852. Wallan Wa4 staging implication: land, route corridors, or facility footprints need protection before subdivision, road design, or asset renewal closes options. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
853. Wallan Wa4 feasibility implication: delivery is easier where development creates a contribution trigger and harder where retrospective acquisition or third-party land is needed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
854. Wallan Wa4 equity implication: the action responds to the strategy objective that access should not depend only on inherited reserve geography. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
855. Wallan Wa4 network implication: trail and reserve works connect homes, schools, town centres, stations, parks, creeks, and regional corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
856. Wallan Wa4 maintenance implication: new or embellished assets add lifecycle costs that must be reconciled with the AMP funding gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
857. Wallan Wa4 development implication: proponents should test whether encumbered land is being counted as usable social-family recreation land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
858. Wallan Wa4 contested issue: implementation can conflict with land availability, agency priorities, environmental constraints, sports code needs, or funding allocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
859. Wallan Wa4 evidence status: the 2013 strategy provides the recommendation but not completion status, cost, agreement, design, or post-2023 review outcome. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
860. Wallan Wa5: Protect key buffer areas and view corridors through planning controls. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
861. Wallan Wa5 delivery mechanism: the action depends on capital works, developer contributions, agency partnership, grant funding, or landowner cooperation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
862. Wallan Wa5 staging implication: land, route corridors, or facility footprints need protection before subdivision, road design, or asset renewal closes options. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
863. Wallan Wa5 feasibility implication: delivery is easier where development creates a contribution trigger and harder where retrospective acquisition or third-party land is needed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
864. Wallan Wa5 equity implication: the action responds to the strategy objective that access should not depend only on inherited reserve geography. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
865. Wallan Wa5 network implication: trail and reserve works connect homes, schools, town centres, stations, parks, creeks, and regional corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
866. Wallan Wa5 maintenance implication: new or embellished assets add lifecycle costs that must be reconciled with the AMP funding gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
867. Wallan Wa5 development implication: proponents should test whether encumbered land is being counted as usable social-family recreation land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
868. Wallan Wa5 contested issue: implementation can conflict with land availability, agency priorities, environmental constraints, sports code needs, or funding allocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
869. Wallan Wa5 evidence status: the 2013 strategy provides the recommendation but not completion status, cost, agreement, design, or post-2023 review outcome. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
870. Wallan Wa6: Advocate for a regional park in the northern growth corridor within the Wallan/Beveridge area. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
871. Wallan Wa6 delivery mechanism: the action depends on capital works, developer contributions, agency partnership, grant funding, or landowner cooperation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
872. Wallan Wa6 staging implication: land, route corridors, or facility footprints need protection before subdivision, road design, or asset renewal closes options. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
873. Wallan Wa6 feasibility implication: delivery is easier where development creates a contribution trigger and harder where retrospective acquisition or third-party land is needed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
874. Wallan Wa6 equity implication: the action responds to the strategy objective that access should not depend only on inherited reserve geography. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
875. Wallan Wa6 network implication: trail and reserve works connect homes, schools, town centres, stations, parks, creeks, and regional corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
876. Wallan Wa6 maintenance implication: new or embellished assets add lifecycle costs that must be reconciled with the AMP funding gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
877. Wallan Wa6 development implication: proponents should test whether encumbered land is being counted as usable social-family recreation land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
878. Wallan Wa6 contested issue: implementation can conflict with land availability, agency priorities, environmental constraints, sports code needs, or funding allocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
879. Wallan Wa6 evidence status: the 2013 strategy provides the recommendation but not completion status, cost, agreement, design, or post-2023 review outcome. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
880. Wallan Wa7: Improve trails from Hidden Valley to Wallan, Spring Ridge to Wallan, and Taylors Creek Reserve. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
881. Wallan Wa7 delivery mechanism: the action depends on capital works, developer contributions, agency partnership, grant funding, or landowner cooperation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
882. Wallan Wa7 staging implication: land, route corridors, or facility footprints need protection before subdivision, road design, or asset renewal closes options. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
883. Wallan Wa7 feasibility implication: delivery is easier where development creates a contribution trigger and harder where retrospective acquisition or third-party land is needed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
884. Wallan Wa7 equity implication: the action responds to the strategy objective that access should not depend only on inherited reserve geography. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
885. Wallan Wa7 network implication: trail and reserve works connect homes, schools, town centres, stations, parks, creeks, and regional corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
886. Wallan Wa7 maintenance implication: new or embellished assets add lifecycle costs that must be reconciled with the AMP funding gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
887. Wallan Wa7 development implication: proponents should test whether encumbered land is being counted as usable social-family recreation land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
888. Wallan Wa7 contested issue: implementation can conflict with land availability, agency priorities, environmental constraints, sports code needs, or funding allocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
889. Wallan Wa7 evidence status: the 2013 strategy provides the recommendation but not completion status, cost, agreement, design, or post-2023 review outcome. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
890. Wallan Wa8: Undertake a development plan for Green Hill Reserve. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
891. Wallan Wa8 delivery mechanism: the action depends on capital works, developer contributions, agency partnership, grant funding, or landowner cooperation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
892. Wallan Wa8 staging implication: land, route corridors, or facility footprints need protection before subdivision, road design, or asset renewal closes options. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
893. Wallan Wa8 feasibility implication: delivery is easier where development creates a contribution trigger and harder where retrospective acquisition or third-party land is needed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
894. Wallan Wa8 equity implication: the action responds to the strategy objective that access should not depend only on inherited reserve geography. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
895. Wallan Wa8 network implication: trail and reserve works connect homes, schools, town centres, stations, parks, creeks, and regional corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
896. Wallan Wa8 maintenance implication: new or embellished assets add lifecycle costs that must be reconciled with the AMP funding gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
897. Wallan Wa8 development implication: proponents should test whether encumbered land is being counted as usable social-family recreation land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
898. Wallan Wa8 contested issue: implementation can conflict with land availability, agency priorities, environmental constraints, sports code needs, or funding allocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
899. Wallan Wa8 evidence status: the 2013 strategy provides the recommendation but not completion status, cost, agreement, design, or post-2023 review outcome. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
900. Wallan Wa9: Undertake land acquisition as resources allow to improve aggregate open-space provision. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
901. Wallan Wa9 delivery mechanism: the action depends on capital works, developer contributions, agency partnership, grant funding, or landowner cooperation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
902. Wallan Wa9 staging implication: land, route corridors, or facility footprints need protection before subdivision, road design, or asset renewal closes options. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
903. Wallan Wa9 feasibility implication: delivery is easier where development creates a contribution trigger and harder where retrospective acquisition or third-party land is needed. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
904. Wallan Wa9 equity implication: the action responds to the strategy objective that access should not depend only on inherited reserve geography. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
905. Wallan Wa9 network implication: trail and reserve works connect homes, schools, town centres, stations, parks, creeks, and regional corridors. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
906. Wallan Wa9 maintenance implication: new or embellished assets add lifecycle costs that must be reconciled with the AMP funding gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
907. Wallan Wa9 development implication: proponents should test whether encumbered land is being counted as usable social-family recreation land. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
908. Wallan Wa9 contested issue: implementation can conflict with land availability, agency priorities, environmental constraints, sports code needs, or funding allocation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
909. Wallan Wa9 evidence status: the 2013 strategy provides the recommendation but not completion status, cost, agreement, design, or post-2023 review outcome. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)

Asset Management and Financial Feasibility

910. The AMP covers playgrounds. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
911. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
912. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
913. The AMP covers BMX and skate park facilities. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
914. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
915. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
916. The AMP covers public and sports lighting. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
917. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
918. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
919. The AMP covers open-space furniture. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
920. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
921. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
922. The AMP covers outdoor tennis and netball courts. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
923. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
924. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
925. The AMP covers sporting ovals. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
926. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
927. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
928. The AMP covers memorials and statues. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
929. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
930. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
931. The AMP covers irrigation. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
932. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
933. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
934. The AMP covers fencing, walls, and gates. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
935. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
936. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
937. The AMP covers signage. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
938. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
939. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
940. The AMP excludes aquatic facilities because pools are included in a separate buildings plan. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
941. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
942. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
943. The AMP states most of the portfolio is in Very Good or better condition. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
944. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
945. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
946. The AMP states that the condition finding requires further validation. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
947. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
948. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
949. The AMP gives estimated fair value replacement cost as $30.58 million as at 30 June 2021. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
950. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
951. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
952. Gross Replacement Cost is $30,589,920. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
953. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
954. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
955. Depreciable Amount is $30,589,920. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
956. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
957. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
958. Depreciated Replacement Cost is $21,414,307. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
959. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
960. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
961. Annual Average Asset Consumption is $961,507. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
962. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
963. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
964. Council was developing comprehensive levels of service for parks and open space. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
965. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
966. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
967. Current management was based on budget and resource allocations. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
968. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
969. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
970. Current management was based on community feedback. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
971. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
972. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
973. Current management was based on active monitoring. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
974. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
975. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
976. Current management was based on reactive responses to community concerns. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
977. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
978. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
979. Present funding levels were insufficient to continue existing services at current levels in the medium term. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
980. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
981. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
982. Deteriorating assets were identified as a service consequence. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
983. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
984. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
985. An increasing asset renewal gap was identified as a sustainability consequence. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
986. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
987. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
988. Generational cost shifting was identified as a consequence. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
989. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
990. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
991. Inability to meet demand for new services was identified as a consequence. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
992. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
993. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
994. Wallan falls within the Melbourne Urban Growth Area. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
995. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
996. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
997. Beveridge falls within the Melbourne Urban Growth Area. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
998. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
999. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1000. Wallan and Beveridge were experiencing rapid change. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1001. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1002. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1003. Current service gaps were being exacerbated in Wallan and Beveridge. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1004. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1005. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1006. Kilmore was growing rapidly. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1007. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1008. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1009. Broadford was growing rapidly. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1010. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1011. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1012. Kilmore services were being stretched by population pressure and ageing assets. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1013. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1014. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1015. Broadford services were being stretched by population pressure and ageing assets. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1016. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1017. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1018. Other townships were characterised by ageing infrastructure that may no longer be fit for purpose. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1019. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1020. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1021. Future demands include differing community groups. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1022. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1023. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1024. Future demands include changing demographics. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1025. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1026. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1027. Future demands include diverse geography. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1028. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1029. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1030. Future demands include expectations that new-estate service levels will be replicated in older estates. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1031. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1032. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1033. Future demands include ageing and inadequate infrastructure. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1034. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1035. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1036. Future demands include accessibility and inclusivity. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1037. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1038. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1039. Future demands include changing organised-sport participation. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1040. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1041. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1042. Future demands include climate resilience. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1043. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1044. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1045. Demand management includes managing existing assets. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1046. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1047. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1048. Demand management includes upgrading existing assets. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1049. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1050. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1051. Demand management includes providing new assets. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1052. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1053. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1054. Demand management includes non-asset solutions. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1055. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1056. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1057. Demand management includes insurance against risks. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1058. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1059. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1060. Demand management includes managing failures. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1061. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1062. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1063. Demand management includes formal planning and community consultation. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1064. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1065. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1066. Demand management includes regular asset inspection. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1067. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1068. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1069. Demand management includes advocacy for government grants. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1070. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1071. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1072. Demand management includes shared use of facilities. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1073. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1074. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1075. Demand management includes relationships with non-Council asset owners. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1076. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1077. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1078. Estimated available 10-year parks/open-space operating and capital funding was $107.2 million. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1079. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1080. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1081. The 107.2 million estimate equals 10.7 million average per year. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1082. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1083. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1084. The $107.2 million estimate is 87% of the cost to sustain current service level at lowest lifecycle cost. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1085. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1086. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1087. Council did not allocate enough funding to sustain all services at desired standard. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1088. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1089. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1090. Council did not allocate enough funding to provide all new services sought. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1091. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1092. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1093. Insufficient funding creates risk of deterioration below acceptable service standards. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1094. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1095. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1096. Insufficient funding creates climate-related asset and service risks. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1097. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1098. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1099. Insufficient funding creates risk that service provision does not meet projected demand. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1100. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1101. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1102. The AMP identifies Conquest III as the asset management system. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1103. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1104. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1105. The AMP identifies RapidMap as parks and open-space maintenance data infrastructure. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1106. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1107. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1108. Targeted customer research had not been undertaken for parks and open-space assets at that stage. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1109. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1110. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1111. The 2020 satisfaction survey indicated moderate satisfaction with parks and open-space services. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1112. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1113. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1114. Satisfaction declined from the previous year. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1115. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1116. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1117. The Open Space Strategy was the key instrument defining service levels for parks and open space. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1118. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1119. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1120. The Open Space Strategy was planned to be reviewed and updated. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1121. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1122. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1123. Review funding implications should inform AMP and Long Term Financial Plan projections. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1124. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1125. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1126. The Open Space Strategy and AMP inform long-term financial planning. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1127. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1128. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1129. Projected upgrade/new asset expenditure was drawn from the Long-Term Financial Plan. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1130. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1131. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1132. Projected upgrade/new asset expenditure was drawn from the Recreation and Open Space 10-year capital works program. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1133. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1134. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1135. Projected upgrade/new asset expenditure was drawn from developer contribution projections. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1136. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1137. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1138. Adequate overall lifecycle funding existed in the first four years of the plan. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1139. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1140. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1141. Major projects continued beyond the first four years. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1142. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1143. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1144. State and Federal Government funding was expected to achieve shortfalls. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1145. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1146. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1147. Council faced a shortfall in predicted asset renewal and maintenance demand. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1148. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1149. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1150. Maintenance and operations requirements will increase as the asset base grows. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1151. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1152. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1153. The growing asset base contributes significantly to the lifecycle funding gap. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1154. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1155. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1156. The Open Space Strategy and service plans should identify assets no longer supporting core service delivery. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1157. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1158. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1159. No critical assets and failure modes had been identified for that AMP. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1160. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1161. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1162. Future risk assessment should identify and prioritise critical park and open-space assets. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1163. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1164. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1165. Lack of funding resulting in reduced service levels was identified as a very high risk before treatment. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1166. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1167. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1168. Impacts to services and assets due to changing climate were identified as a risk. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1169. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1170. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1171. Service provision that does not meet projected demand was identified as a risk. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1172. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1173. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1174. The asset renewal funding ratio was 44%. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1175. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1176. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1177. The 44% ratio means Council expected 44% of required optimal renewal/replacement funds over 10 years. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1178. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1179. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1180. Required operations, maintenance, and capital renewal expenditure was $8.98 million average per year. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1181. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1182. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1183. Budgeted operations, maintenance, and capital renewal funding was $6.88 million average per year. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1184. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1185. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1186. The 10-year funding shortfall was $2.1 million per year. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1187. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1188. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1189. Budgeted funding represented 77% of projected expenditure needed for documented services. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1190. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1191. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1192. The 77% figure excludes new and upgraded assets. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1193. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1194. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1195. Total 2022-2031 renewal expenditure was $5.8065 million. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1196. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1197. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1198. Total 2022-2031 upgrade/new/expansion expenditure was $37.747501 million. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1199. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1200. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1201. Total 2022-2031 maintenance and operations expenditure was $62.554689 million. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1202. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1203. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1204. Operations and maintenance funding comes from Council own-source revenue. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1205. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1206. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1207. Renewal funding comes from Council own-source revenue. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1208. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1209. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1210. Capital improvement funding can come from Council own-source revenue. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1211. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1212. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1213. Capital improvement funding can come from external grants. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1214. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1215. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1216. Capital improvement funding can come from developer contributions and Open Space Reserve. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1217. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1218. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1219. Capital improvement funding can come from donated assets. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1220. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1221. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1222. Financial projections were in present-day dollars as at 30 June 2021. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1223. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1224. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1225. The AMP assumed staffing needs were adequately resourced. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1226. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1227. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1228. The AMP assumed current service levels reflected current community needs unless a revised strategy and capital works program were adopted. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1229. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1230. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1231. The AMP assumed the current operating budget was optimal for operations and maintenance. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1232. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1233. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1234. Projected renewal was to achieve overall asset condition grade of Poor or better. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1235. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1236. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1237. Average growth in replacement value of the asset base was assumed at 9.1% per annum. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1238. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1239. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1240. The 9.1% assumption was based on capital new/expansion forecasts and projected developer contributions. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1241. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1242. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1243. Forecasts must be reviewed after the Open Space Strategy review and service-level requirements are updated. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1244. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1245. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1246. Data confidence was C - Uncertain. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1247. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1248. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1249. Uncertainty reflected limited quality of parks/open-space inventory and condition data. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1250. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1251. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1252. No sensitivity analysis had been applied to deterioration trends, renewal trends, upgrade allocation, funding, service-level changes, or robust condition data. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1253. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1254. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1255. The AMP is a living document. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1256. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1257. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1258. Council should undertake a service-level review to understand current and future customer needs. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1259. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1260. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1261. The AMP is a 4-year plan with a 10-year outlook. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1262. Mechanism: this converts open-space planning into asset funding, renewal, maintenance, and risk management. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
1263. Development feasibility implication: new reserves, trails, lights, play spaces, trees, or pavilions add recurring lifecycle demand to an already constrained funding model. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)

Beveridge Central and the Draft 2024 Review Signal

1264. Mitchell Shire is described as one of Victorias fastest-growing municipalities. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1265. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1266. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1267. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1268. Beveridge is in the southern growth area. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1269. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1270. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1271. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1272. Beveridge estimated population in 2024 was 9,120. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1273. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1274. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1275. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1276. Beveridge is projected to become Mitchell Shires largest population centre by 2046. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1277. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1278. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1279. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1280. Beveridge is forecast to grow to more than 112,000 people by 2046. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1281. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1282. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1283. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1284. The Shire is forecast to reach more than 221,000 people by 2046. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1285. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1286. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1287. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1288. Beveridge is projected to grow from 4,243 people in 2021 to 112,187 in 2046. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1289. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1290. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1291. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1292. The 2021-2046 Beveridge increase is stated as 2,545% over 25 years. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1293. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1294. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1295. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1296. By 2046, 26.3% of Beveridge population is projected to be aged over 50 years. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1297. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1298. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1299. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1300. Beveridge currently had no sports fields in the master plan baseline. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1301. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1302. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1303. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1304. Beveridge Recreation Reserve includes two tennis courts with a netball overlay. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1305. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1306. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1307. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1308. Mandalay Estate includes an adjoining 18-hole golf course. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1309. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1310. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1311. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1312. The Beveridge Central PSP identifies a 6.79ha active open-space site. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1313. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1314. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1315. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1316. The Beveridge Central AOS master plan study was commissioned in March 2024. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1317. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1318. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1319. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1320. The site is at Patterson Road and Lithgow Street. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1321. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1322. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1323. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1324. The site comprises three Council-owned land parcels. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1325. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1326. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1327. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1328. Land Parcel 1 is 2.29ha at 34 Lithgow Street. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1329. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1330. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1331. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1332. Land Parcel 2 is 2.33ha at 72 Lithgow Street. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1333. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1334. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1335. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1336. Land Parcel 3 is 2.48ha at 86 Patterson Road. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1337. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1338. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1339. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1340. A 0.32ha portion is required for Patterson Road duplication and Lithgow Street intersection expansion. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1341. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1342. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1343. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1344. The developable sport and recreation area is 6.47ha. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1345. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1346. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1347. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1348. The site falls from northwest to southeast. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1349. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1350. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1351. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1352. The site has a 6.4m overall drop. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1353. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1354. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1355. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1356. The 6.4m drop equates to an average grade of 1:60. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1357. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1358. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1359. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1360. The grade requires significant earthworks and retaining walls for sports facility development. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1361. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1362. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1363. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1364. Basalt bedrock in the western section is predominantly within the top half metre. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1365. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1366. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1367. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1368. Shallow basalt can slow excavation and increase costs. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1369. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1370. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1371. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1372. Depth to bedrock increases to about 2m in the southwest corner. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1373. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1374. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1375. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1376. Basalt location influenced the master plan to contain construction costs. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1377. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1378. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1379. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1380. The site contains 86 trees. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1381. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1382. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1383. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1384. The site has 21 street trees outside the boundary. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1385. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1386. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1387. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1388. The master plan shows all street trees retained. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1389. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1390. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1391. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1392. An arborist assessed 18 trees as High Retention Value. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1393. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1394. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1395. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1396. All 18 High Retention Value trees are in Land Parcel 2. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1397. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1398. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1399. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1400. The executive summary says six High Retention Value trees are retained. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1401. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1402. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1403. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1404. The cricket practice nets area allows retention of four High Retention Value trees. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1405. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1406. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1407. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1408. Cricket-net tree retention needs further design testing because shadows could affect batting safety. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1409. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1410. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1411. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1412. Offset planting is supported to compensate for tree loss. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1413. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1414. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1415. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1416. The site is planned for soccer and cricket needs. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1417. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1418. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1419. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1420. Tennis was initially identified in the PSP. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1421. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1422. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1423. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1424. Small-sided soccer pitches are preferred to tennis courts in the master plan. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1425. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1426. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1427. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1428. The soccer focus is consistent with Draft Open Space Strategy 2024 directions. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1429. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1430. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1431. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1432. The Draft Open Space Strategy 2024 nominates 3 rectangular pitches and 1 cricket oval overlay for the site. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1433. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1434. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1435. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1436. Tennis is expected through Lockerbie North PSP active open spaces and other longer-term PSP active open spaces. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1437. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1438. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1439. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1440. The master plan includes one enclosed main soccer pitch. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1441. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1442. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1443. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1444. The master plan includes two soccer pitches with cricket oval overlay. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1445. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1446. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1447. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1448. The master plan includes four cricket practice nets. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1449. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1450. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1451. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1452. The master plan includes four synthetic small-sided soccer pitches. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1453. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1454. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1455. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1456. The master plan includes one community facility. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1457. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1458. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1459. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1460. The master plan includes district-level play space with picnic tables, BBQ, and shelter. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1461. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1462. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1463. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1464. The master plan includes car parking. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1465. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1466. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1467. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1468. The master plan includes shared paths, tree planting, and landscaping. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1469. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1470. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1471. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1472. All sports facilities are to have north-south orientation. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1473. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1474. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1475. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1476. Design had to reduce impacts of lighting, noise, and traffic on current and future dwellings. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1477. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1478. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1479. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1480. Council preferred car park ingress and egress from Lithgow Street and Patterson Road. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1481. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1482. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1483. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1484. The reserve interface with Melaleuca Boulevard and the future eastern road had to remain welcoming and open. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1485. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1486. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1487. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1488. The draft master plan was exhibited from 21 February to 24 March 2025. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1489. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1490. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1491. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1492. Community and stakeholder feedback contributed to finalisation. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1493. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1494. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1495. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1496. The road reserve is for future Patterson Road duplication and signalisation. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1497. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1498. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1499. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1500. The car park provides approximately 200 spaces in the report narrative. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1501. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1502. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1503. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1504. The cost plan appendix refers to approximately 190 car spaces. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1505. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1506. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1507. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1508. The master plan requires left-in/left-out turns at Lithgow Street and Patterson Road. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1509. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1510. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1511. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1512. Patterson Road left-in/left-out is required because Patterson Road will become a four-lane road. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1513. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1514. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1515. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1516. Lithgow Street right turns are constrained by the expanded intersection, slip lanes, and right-turn lanes. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1517. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1518. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1519. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1520. The master plan includes three car and bus drop-off/pick-up zones. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1521. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1522. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1523. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1524. The main soccer pitch is a high-performance soccer pitch. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1525. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1526. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1527. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1528. The main soccer pitch includes a perimeter fence. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1529. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1530. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1531. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1532. The main soccer pitch includes technical boxes. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1533. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1534. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1535. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1536. The main soccer pitch includes player shelters. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1537. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1538. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1539. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1540. The main soccer pitch includes 500 lux sports lighting. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1541. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1542. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1543. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1544. The main soccer pitch uses a hybrid surface. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1545. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1546. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1547. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1548. The hybrid surface combines natural grass and reinforcing synthetic fibres. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1549. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1550. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1551. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1552. The hybrid surface improves durability and grass-profile stability. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1553. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1554. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1555. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1556. The pitch has capacity for temporary tiered spectator seating north and northwest of the pitch. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1557. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1558. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1559. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1560. The community facility is shared use. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1561. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1562. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1563. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1564. The community facility is two storeys. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1565. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1566. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1567. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1568. The community facility includes reception. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1569. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1570. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1571. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1572. The community facility includes a cafe. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1573. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1574. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1575. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1576. The community facility includes administration. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1577. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1578. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1579. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1580. The community facility includes a family room. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1581. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1582. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1583. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1584. The community facility includes a multi-faith room. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1585. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1586. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1587. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1588. The community facility includes stair and lift access. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1589. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1590. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1591. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1592. The community facility includes high-performance change rooms and amenities. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1593. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1594. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1595. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1596. The community facility includes a coach change room. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1597. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1598. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1599. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1600. The community facility includes a theatrette. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1601. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1602. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1603. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1604. The community facility includes internal store. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1605. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1606. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1607. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1608. The community facility includes four change rooms for the two soccer pitches and cricket oval. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1609. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1610. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1611. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1612. The community facility includes undercover seating for 200 people. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1613. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1614. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1615. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1616. The small-sided soccer pitches are two banks of two pitches. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1617. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1618. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1619. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1620. The small-sided pitches are enclosed with chain-mesh side fencing. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1621. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1622. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1623. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1624. The small-sided pitches have roof netting. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1625. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1626. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1627. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1628. Flexible netting can retract to create a half-pitch soccer training facility. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1629. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1630. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1631. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1632. The community soccer pitches include a cricket oval overlay. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1633. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1634. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1635. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1636. The cricket overlay uses a synthetic centre pitch. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1637. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1638. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1639. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1640. The community pitches support year-round soccer and summer cricket. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1641. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1642. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1643. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1644. The cricket practice nets contain four lanes. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1645. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1646. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1647. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1648. The cricket nets are fully enclosed to retain balls. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1649. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1650. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1651. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1652. The district play space includes BBQ, picnic tables, and shelter. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1653. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1654. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1655. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1656. The master plan includes one set of AFL goals north of the play space. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1657. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1658. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1659. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1660. The future eastern road may include angled or parallel car parking. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1661. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1662. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1663. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1664. Total master plan implementation cost is $34.790 million ex GST. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1665. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1666. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1667. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1668. Implementation is divided into Stage A and Stage B. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1669. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1670. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1671. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1672. Stage A enables community soccer, cricket, some high-performance soccer, and the play space. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1673. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1674. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1675. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1676. Stage B depends on funding, Council priorities, stakeholder priorities, and broader community need. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1677. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1678. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1679. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1680. Cost estimates include 10% design and construction contingencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1681. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1682. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1683. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1684. Cost estimates include 10% professional fees. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1685. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1686. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1687. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1688. Cost estimates include 1% permits and authority fees. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1689. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1690. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1691. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1692. Cost estimates include escalation to July 2025. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1693. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1694. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1695. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1696. Cost exclusions include GST. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1697. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1698. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1699. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1700. Cost exclusions include contaminated soil removal if encountered. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1701. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1702. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1703. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1704. The car park costs $2.230 million. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1705. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1706. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1707. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1708. The drop-off/pick-up zones cost $545,000. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1709. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1710. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1711. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1712. The main soccer pitch costs $2.405 million. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1713. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1714. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1715. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1716. The shared-use pavilion costs $14.715 million. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1717. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1718. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1719. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1720. Pavilion Stage A costs $6.105 million. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1721. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1722. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1723. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1724. Pavilion Stage B costs $8.610 million. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1725. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1726. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1727. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1728. The assembly and activation space costs $195,000. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1729. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1730. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1731. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1732. The four synthetic small-sided courts cost $2.650 million. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1733. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1734. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1735. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1736. The east-west pedestrian boulevard costs $290,000. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1737. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1738. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1739. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1740. Terraced seating and sports-field access cost $485,000. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1741. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1742. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1743. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1744. The two soccer pitches with cricket overlay cost $2.865 million. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1745. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1746. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1747. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1748. The soccer goal storage compound costs $45,000. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1749. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1750. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1751. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1752. The enclosed cricket practice nets cost $295,000. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1753. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1754. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1755. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1756. The district play space plus BBQ, picnic tables, and shelter costs $1.025 million. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1757. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1758. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1759. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1760. The ephemeral wetland costs $195,000. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1761. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1762. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1763. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1764. Facilities and infrastructure subtotal is $27.940 million. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1765. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1766. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1767. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1768. Service connections cost $1.255 million. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1769. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1770. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1771. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1772. Reserve perimeter fence costs $475,000. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1773. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1774. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1775. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1776. Grassing non-sport and non-paved areas costs $610,000. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1777. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1778. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1779. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1780. New sealed paths cost $405,000. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1781. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1782. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1783. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1784. Park furniture includes 20 bench seats, 10 bins, and 4 drinking fountains. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1785. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1786. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1787. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1788. Park furniture costs $200,000. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1789. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1790. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1791. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1792. Tree planting allowance covers 150 trees. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1793. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1794. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1795. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1796. Tree planting allowance costs $75,000. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1797. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1798. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1799. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1800. General landscaping allowance costs $255,000. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1801. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1802. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1803. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1804. Directional and regulatory signage allowance covers 10 signs. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1805. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1806. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1807. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1808. Directional and regulatory signage costs $75,000. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1809. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1810. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1811. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1812. Other master plan recommendations subtotal is $3.350 million. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1813. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1814. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1815. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1816. Stage A total cost is $18.850 million ex GST. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1817. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1818. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1819. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1820. Stage B total cost is $15.940 million ex GST. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1821. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1822. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1823. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1824. The cost appendix base scheme is approximately $34.365 million excluding GST. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1825. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1826. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1827. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1828. The hybrid main-pitch premium is $425,000. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1829. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1830. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1831. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1832. The cost appendix recommends 4% per annum escalation allowance to construction. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1833. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1834. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1835. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1836. The cost appendix excludes land acquisition costs. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1837. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1838. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1839. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1840. The cost appendix excludes contaminated soil removal if encountered. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1841. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1842. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1843. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1844. The master plan references 12% canopy coverage in the Urban Forest Strategy context. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1845. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1846. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1847. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1848. The master plan references an estimated 41,000 street trees. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1849. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1850. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1851. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1852. The master plan references an estimated 15,000 park trees. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1853. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1854. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1855. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1856. The master plan references a target to increase canopy coverage to 30% by 2073. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1857. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1858. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1859. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1860. Buildings above $15 million construction cost must be minimum 5 Star Green Star compliant under Council building policy. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1861. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1862. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1863. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1864. The Gender Impact Assessment applies a gender lens to reserve design. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1865. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1866. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1867. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1868. The Gender Impact Assessment records concern about places feeling uncared for. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1869. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1870. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1871. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1872. The Gender Impact Assessment records concern about places feeling isolated. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1873. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1874. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1875. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1876. The Gender Impact Assessment records concern about poor surveillance. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1877. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1878. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1879. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1880. The Gender Impact Assessment records concern about lighting. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1881. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1882. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1883. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1884. The Gender Impact Assessment records concern about poor visibility. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1885. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1886. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1887. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1888. The design response includes wide and generally straight paths. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1889. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1890. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1891. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1892. The design response includes canopied trees. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1893. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1894. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1895. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1896. The design response includes lighting. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1897. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1898. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1899. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1900. The design response includes natural surveillance. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1901. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1902. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1903. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1904. The design response includes accessible facilities. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1905. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1906. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1907. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1908. Small-sided soccer pitches provide team-based competitions. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1909. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1910. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1911. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1912. Small-sided soccer pitches provide social soccer opportunities. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1913. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1914. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1915. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1916. Site visits in 2024 informed small-sided soccer facility learnings. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1917. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1918. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1919. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1920. Seven-a-side courts may be more in demand as supplementary soccer training facilities than five-a-side courts. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1921. Mechanism: this shows how the Draft 2024 review and PSP reserve become a concrete active-open-space delivery program. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1922. Staging implication: road land, basalt, grade, tree retention, lighting, car parking, sport geometry, and pavilion stages create hard delivery dependencies. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1923. Development feasibility implication: each hectare, pitch, tree, light level, access movement, and building stage changes cost and service capacity. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

Contested Issues, Mechanisms, and Feasibility Tests

1924. Tennis versus soccer at Beveridge Central shows that PSP facility assumptions can be revised when demand, partnership opportunity, and draft strategy direction change. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1925. Implication: Council and proponents should document the trade-off, affected stakeholders, funding pathway, staging dependency, and residual service risk. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1926. Gross hectares versus developable hectares shows why 6.79ha of PSP land cannot be treated as 6.79ha of usable active open space. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1927. Implication: Council and proponents should document the trade-off, affected stakeholders, funding pathway, staging dependency, and residual service risk. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1928. Tree retention versus sport geometry shows that high-retention trees can conflict with pitch footprints, cricket-net safety, parking, and synthetic-surface maintenance. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1929. Implication: Council and proponents should document the trade-off, affected stakeholders, funding pathway, staging dependency, and residual service risk. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1930. Capital delivery versus operating sustainability shows that grants or contributions can build facilities without solving renewal and maintenance. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1931. Implication: Council and proponents should document the trade-off, affected stakeholders, funding pathway, staging dependency, and residual service risk. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1932. Growth-area provision versus established-township retrofit shows why greenfield PSP reservation is easier than later acquisition. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1933. Implication: Council and proponents should document the trade-off, affected stakeholders, funding pathway, staging dependency, and residual service risk. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1934. Local access versus regional reliance shows why Crown and state regional land cannot replace 400m and 1km neighbourhood access standards. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1935. Implication: Council and proponents should document the trade-off, affected stakeholders, funding pathway, staging dependency, and residual service risk. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1936. Climate adaptation versus active-sport openness shows why shade, canopy, sightlines, pitch surfaces, and lighting must be balanced. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1937. Implication: Council and proponents should document the trade-off, affected stakeholders, funding pathway, staging dependency, and residual service risk. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1938. Road access versus park amenity shows why transport upgrades can remove reserve land and dictate car-park movements. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1939. Implication: Council and proponents should document the trade-off, affected stakeholders, funding pathway, staging dependency, and residual service risk. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1940. High-performance soccer versus community sport shows why Beveridge Central must stage elite, community, cricket, and play-space functions. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1941. Implication: Council and proponents should document the trade-off, affected stakeholders, funding pathway, staging dependency, and residual service risk. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1942. Fenced sport versus open parkland shows why security, ticketing, and ball containment can conflict with permeability and neighbourhood interface. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1943. Implication: Council and proponents should document the trade-off, affected stakeholders, funding pathway, staging dependency, and residual service risk. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1944. Cost certainty versus exclusions shows why GST, land acquisition, contamination, and escalation need separate feasibility allowances. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1945. Implication: Council and proponents should document the trade-off, affected stakeholders, funding pathway, staging dependency, and residual service risk. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1946. Service-level expectations in new estates versus older estates show why open-space equity is both a capital and political issue. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1947. Implication: Council and proponents should document the trade-off, affected stakeholders, funding pathway, staging dependency, and residual service risk. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1948. Data-driven asset management versus uncertain data shows why C - Uncertain inventory confidence limits precision. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1949. Implication: Council and proponents should document the trade-off, affected stakeholders, funding pathway, staging dependency, and residual service risk. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1950. Aspirational action lists versus delivery evidence show why post-2013 completion reporting is essential. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1951. Implication: Council and proponents should document the trade-off, affected stakeholders, funding pathway, staging dependency, and residual service risk. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1952. Draft 2024 review evidence versus absent draft text shows why the full review document is a priority gap. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1953. Implication: Council and proponents should document the trade-off, affected stakeholders, funding pathway, staging dependency, and residual service risk. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1954. Does each growth-area dwelling sit within 400m of social-family recreation open space? (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1955. Implication: Council and proponents should document the trade-off, affected stakeholders, funding pathway, staging dependency, and residual service risk. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1956. Does each growth-area dwelling sit within 1km of sport open space? (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1957. Implication: Council and proponents should document the trade-off, affected stakeholders, funding pathway, staging dependency, and residual service risk. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1958. Is social-family recreation land at least 1ha where the strategy requires that standard? (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1959. Implication: Council and proponents should document the trade-off, affected stakeholders, funding pathway, staging dependency, and residual service risk. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1960. Is sport open space at least 8ha where the strategy requires that standard? (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1961. Implication: Council and proponents should document the trade-off, affected stakeholders, funding pathway, staging dependency, and residual service risk. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1962. Is the land unencumbered, or is drainage/utility land being over-counted? (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1963. Implication: Council and proponents should document the trade-off, affected stakeholders, funding pathway, staging dependency, and residual service risk. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1964. Are trails continuous to schools, town centres, stations, reserves, and regional corridors? (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1965. Implication: Council and proponents should document the trade-off, affected stakeholders, funding pathway, staging dependency, and residual service risk. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1966. Has future road widening been deducted from reserve area? (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1967. Implication: Council and proponents should document the trade-off, affected stakeholders, funding pathway, staging dependency, and residual service risk. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1968. Has geotechnical risk been costed before layout is fixed? (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1969. Implication: Council and proponents should document the trade-off, affected stakeholders, funding pathway, staging dependency, and residual service risk. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1970. Has tree-retention value been mapped before pitch and car-park design? (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1971. Implication: Council and proponents should document the trade-off, affected stakeholders, funding pathway, staging dependency, and residual service risk. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1972. Have sports-lighting lux levels been tested against residential interfaces? (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1973. Implication: Council and proponents should document the trade-off, affected stakeholders, funding pathway, staging dependency, and residual service risk. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1974. Has car-park access been tested against future road hierarchy? (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1975. Implication: Council and proponents should document the trade-off, affected stakeholders, funding pathway, staging dependency, and residual service risk. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1976. Has Stage A been defined as a minimum community-service package? (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1977. Implication: Council and proponents should document the trade-off, affected stakeholders, funding pathway, staging dependency, and residual service risk. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1978. Has Stage B been tied to funding and demand triggers? (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1979. Implication: Council and proponents should document the trade-off, affected stakeholders, funding pathway, staging dependency, and residual service risk. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1980. Has each new asset been added to lifecycle maintenance and renewal modelling? (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1981. Implication: Council and proponents should document the trade-off, affected stakeholders, funding pathway, staging dependency, and residual service risk. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1982. Has funding source been identified for each asset? (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1983. Implication: Council and proponents should document the trade-off, affected stakeholders, funding pathway, staging dependency, and residual service risk. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1984. Has grant reliance been treated as a timing risk? (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1985. Implication: Council and proponents should document the trade-off, affected stakeholders, funding pathway, staging dependency, and residual service risk. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1986. Has accessibility for older adults, disabled residents, teenagers, children, and lower-income households been tested? (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1987. Implication: Council and proponents should document the trade-off, affected stakeholders, funding pathway, staging dependency, and residual service risk. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1988. Has gender-impact design tested surveillance, lighting, visibility, amenities, and direct routes? (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1989. Implication: Council and proponents should document the trade-off, affected stakeholders, funding pathway, staging dependency, and residual service risk. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1990. Has climate adaptation been designed through canopy, shade, WSUD, irrigation, and stormwater treatment? (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1991. Implication: Council and proponents should document the trade-off, affected stakeholders, funding pathway, staging dependency, and residual service risk. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1992. Has first cost been separated from operating cost? (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1993. Implication: Council and proponents should document the trade-off, affected stakeholders, funding pathway, staging dependency, and residual service risk. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1994. Has escalation been included? (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1995. Implication: Council and proponents should document the trade-off, affected stakeholders, funding pathway, staging dependency, and residual service risk. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1996. Has GST been excluded or included explicitly? (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1997. Implication: Council and proponents should document the trade-off, affected stakeholders, funding pathway, staging dependency, and residual service risk. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1998. Has contamination risk been priced or excluded explicitly? (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
1999. Implication: Council and proponents should document the trade-off, affected stakeholders, funding pathway, staging dependency, and residual service risk. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
2000. Has land acquisition been priced or excluded explicitly? (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
2001. Implication: Council and proponents should document the trade-off, affected stakeholders, funding pathway, staging dependency, and residual service risk. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
2002. Has the 2024 draft review changed the 2013 facility hierarchy? (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
2003. Implication: Council and proponents should document the trade-off, affected stakeholders, funding pathway, staging dependency, and residual service risk. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
2004. Have 2013 locality actions been completed, superseded, or carried forward? (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
2005. Implication: Council and proponents should document the trade-off, affected stakeholders, funding pathway, staging dependency, and residual service risk. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
2006. Has regional open-space reliance been tested against ownership and management responsibility? (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
2007. Implication: Council and proponents should document the trade-off, affected stakeholders, funding pathway, staging dependency, and residual service risk. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
2008. Is the future asset Council-owned, Council-managed, committee-managed, school-shared, Crown-managed, or privately maintained? (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
2009. Implication: Council and proponents should document the trade-off, affected stakeholders, funding pathway, staging dependency, and residual service risk. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
2010. Is the action a minimum service standard or an aspirational action dependent on future funding? (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
2011. Implication: Council and proponents should document the trade-off, affected stakeholders, funding pathway, staging dependency, and residual service risk. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
2012. Has operating cost been quantified for every pitch, pavilion, light, path, playground, tree, bin, seat, fence, and sign? (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
2013. Implication: Council and proponents should document the trade-off, affected stakeholders, funding pathway, staging dependency, and residual service risk. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

Bottom Line

2014. The Mitchell open-space framework is a chain: forecast growth creates access standards; access standards create land reservations; land reservations create capital works; capital works create maintenance and renewal liabilities; liabilities create funding and service-level risk; and funding risk feeds back into what can actually be promised to residents. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
2015. Beveridge Central is the clearest worked example: a 6.79ha PSP reserve becomes 6.47ha developable active open space, must absorb soccer, cricket, play, path, tree, traffic, safety, stormwater, and community-facility requirements, and costs $34.790 million ex GST before GST, contamination, and land-acquisition exclusions. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
2016. The feasibility question is not whether open space appears on a plan; it is whether the land is usable, connected, funded, staged, and maintainable across the asset life. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt; beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)