Wallan Structure Plan

Executive Thesis

  • Wallan is a fast-urbanising southern Mitchell township where structure planning must reconcile Melbourne growth pressure, commuter transport, floodplains, volcanic landforms, Wurundjeri cultural values, biodiversity protection, sports-field demand, town-centre identity and long-term Council asset liabilities. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Wallan is forecast to grow from 18,758 people in 2025 to 49,123 people in 2045, a 161.9 percent increase. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
  • The Council and Health Plan gives Wallan a 2036 forecast of 29,601 people and a 2046 forecast of 51,539 people. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • An older forecast in the regional-park report had Wallan growing from 12,924 people in 2019 to 43,712 people in 2041, an increase of 238 percent. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Mitchell Shire is forecast in the Asset Plan to grow from 64,175 people in 2025 to 209,508 people in 2045, a 226.5 percent increase. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
  • The Health Profile states that Mitchell had an estimated resident population of 53,723 in 2023 and is projected to reach 176,261 by 2041. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
  • Most Mitchell growth is identified as occurring in the southern townships of Beveridge, Kilmore and Wallan. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
  • The core planning problem is therefore not whether Wallan grows, but whether infrastructure, services, conservation land and transport capacity are sequenced before growth converts into congestion, heat, flood exposure, social-service lag and renewal liabilities. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Mechanism: Population growth creates lot demand, which creates roads, drainage, parks, paths and buildings; those assets may be funded upfront by developers, grants and borrowing, but Council inherits maintenance and renewal obligations. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Dependency: Wallan feasibility depends on PSP timing, infrastructure contribution plans, developer delivery, State transport investment, Melbourne Water flood modelling, Wurundjeri cultural-values work and Council lifecycle budgeting. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Evidence Base And Corpus Limits

  • The requested file /c/pi/schema/CLAUDE.md was not present at C:\pi\schema\CLAUDE.md during drafting. (Source: local workspace check)
  • The current Wallan Structure Plan page did not exist before drafting. (Source: local workspace check)
  • No standalone original Wallan Structure Plan PDF, panel report or submission set was found in the extracted Mitchell corpus. (Source: local corpus search)
  • The deepest Wallan-specific spatial source in the corpus is the 2022 wallan wallan Regional Park feasibility report. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • The strongest current strategic source is the 2025-2029 Council and Health Plan because it gives population forecasts and initiatives for structure plans, transport, open space, community hubs and town centres. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • The strongest fiscal source is the 2025-2035 Asset Plan because it quantifies capital allocation, growth funding, renewal pressure and Wallan growth. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
  • The strongest social source is the 2024 Health Profile because it quantifies population, housing, homelessness, health risks, family violence and emergency-preparedness indicators. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
  • The strongest contestation source is the 2025 deliberative engagement report because it records community concerns about roads, Wallan-to-Epping traffic, Hume Freeway duplication, assets, consultation trust, aquatics, Wallan quarry and growth. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
  • The strongest recreation-planning source is the 2014 Sports Field Feasibility Study because it focuses on greenfield sports infrastructure in Mitchell South and the Wallan/Beveridge sub-region. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
  • The strongest township-identity source is the Wallan and Surrounds Visitor Guide because it identifies Wallan history, Hadfield Park, High Street, the Mechanics Institute, Taylors Creek and travel distances. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)

Spatial Frame

  • Wallan is located in the south of Mitchell Shire. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
  • Wallan and surrounds are just under one hour north of Melbourne by the Hume Freeway or V/Line train service. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
  • The visitor guide gives Wallan to Melbourne as 61.8 kilometres and 52 minutes. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
  • The visitor guide gives Wallan to Albury as 269.6 kilometres and 2 hours 39 minutes. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
  • The visitor guide gives Wallan to Bendigo as 108.5 kilometres and 1 hour 20 minutes. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
  • The visitor guide gives Wallan to Shepparton as 131.5 kilometres and 1 hour 24 minutes. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
  • The visitor guide gives Wallan to Ballarat as 131.7 kilometres and 1 hour 38 minutes. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
  • Historically, Wallan was a rural village used as a rest stop before travellers climbed Pretty Sally Hill and crossed the Great Dividing Range. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
  • The regional-park study area is primarily in Mitchell Shire and includes a south-eastern portion in the City of Whittlesea. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • The study area is on Wurundjeri Woi-wurrung land and the entire area is culturally significant. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • The study area includes Mt Fraser, Spring Hill and Green Hill. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • The study area includes Herne Swamp, Meade Swamp and burrung buluk, formerly Hanna Swamp. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • The study area includes the northern reaches of Merri Creek, whose headwaters are further north at Heathcote Junction. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • The study area includes the buffer around the Wallan sewage treatment facility. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • The study area includes flood-mitigation land in the upper Merri catchment. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • The study area includes wooded slopes west of Wallan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Growth Arithmetic

  • Wallan 2025 population is 18,758. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
  • Wallan 2045 population is 49,123. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
  • Wallan 2025-to-2045 growth is 161.9 percent. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
  • Wallan 2036 population is 29,601 in the Council and Health Plan. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • Wallan 2046 population is 51,539 in the Council and Health Plan. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • Beveridge 2025 population is 9,082. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
  • Beveridge 2045 population is 104,066. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
  • Beveridge 2025-to-2045 growth is 1,045.9 percent. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
  • Kilmore-Kilmore East grows from 12,269 people in 2025 to 24,000 people in 2045. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
  • Mitchell Shire grows from 64,175 people in 2025 to 209,508 people in 2045. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
  • The Council and Health Plan expects Mitchell to reach 221,638 people by 2046. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • Mitchell had about 14 babies born per week in 2023-2024. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
  • Mitchell is expected to have around 36 babies born per week by 2041. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)

Structure Plan Mechanism

  • The Growth Corridor Plans guide residential districts, industrial and employment areas, and open-space networks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • The Growth Corridor Plans identify areas of high environmental or landscape value that must be protected from development. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • The Growth Corridor Plans identify constrained land, including flood-prone land, not expected to be developable. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • The Growth Corridor Plans define integrated open-space networks for amenity, recreation, natural-feature protection, heritage, biodiversity and healthy waterways. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • The three relevant Growth Corridor Plan principles are high amenity and character, protection of biodiversity-waterways-cultural heritage, and integrated open-space networks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Approved precinct structure plans in the study context include Lockerbie, Lockerbie North and Beveridge Central. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Precincts undergoing PSP planning in the study context include Beveridge North West, Wallan South and Wallan East part 1. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Precincts yet to undergo PSP planning in the study context include Wallan East part 2, Merrifield North, Beveridge South West, Northern Freight and Beveridge North East. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Council Plan initiative 3.4.2 is to review and implement township structure plans as required. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)

Infrastructure Funding

  • The ten-year Asset Plan allocates approximately 79 percent, or $573 million, of capital budget to growth-supporting investment. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
  • The ten-year Asset Plan allocates 21 percent, or $155 million, to preserving existing assets. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
  • The capital program includes 528 million for new assets, 155 million for renewal and $45 million for upgrade and expansion. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
  • Annual renewal investment rises from 9.7 million in 2025-2026 to 19.1 million in 2034-2035. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
  • Growth-related investments are funded predominantly by grants, developer contributions and borrowing, with minimal reliance on Council cash. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
  • Developers cover the majority of upfront costs for new growth. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
  • Council is responsible for ongoing maintenance and service delivery over the asset life. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
  • Growth, asset renewal and geography are the top three challenges in the Asset Plan. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)

Regional Park

  • The Victorian Government committed in 2018 to a feasibility study for a regional park in Wallan within the Northern Growth Corridor. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • The wallan wallan Regional Park feasibility project was led by the Department of Energy, Environment and Climate Action. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • The Wurundjeri Woi-wurrung name for the Wallan region is wallan wallan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • The future park name will be determined by Wurundjeri Woi-wurrung people. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Regional parks are large open spaces with natural or semi-natural surroundings near urban environments. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Regional parks have high landscape, biodiversity and cultural values. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Regional parks provide passive recreation, education and tourism opportunities. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • The future park has an anticipated catchment of 15 kilometres from park boundaries. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • The 15 kilometre catchment would serve at least 230,000 people in 2021. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • The 15 kilometre catchment would serve approximately 430,000 people by 2036. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Growth-corridor regional park planning uses at least 40 hectares of passive open space for every 150,000 people. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • New regional parks generally take 10 to 15 years to establish. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • The potential park may be as large as 1,000 hectares. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Council Plan initiative 3.1.2 advocates for Wallan Wallan Regional Parklands. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • The park should incorporate representative elements of Wallan environmental character. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • The park should protect environmental values through conservation outcomes. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • The park should reflect the cultural landscape and areas of high cultural heritage significance. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • The park should respond to anticipated 100 ARI flood levels. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • The park should connect different features into an immersive park-user experience. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • The park should connect with other regional open space. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • The park should respond to anticipated future urban growth form and activity. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • The park should recognise future transport access potential and barriers. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • The park should recognise utility service corridors and asset locations. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • The park should respond to accessibility requirements of a diverse community. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Flood And Water

  • Study-area waterways include upper Merri Creek, Kalkallo Creek, Strathaird Creek and Taylors Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Merri Creek upper reaches, Taylors Creek, Strathaird Creek and Kalkallo Creek have been channelised. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Herne Swamp, burrung buluk and Meade Swamp are seasonal or ephemeral wetlands. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • The wetlands have been drained for agriculture but low-lying areas remain subject to inundation during heavy rainfall. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • The full extent of wetlands remains to be determined through separate investigation. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Herne Swamp is hydrologically constrained because new and proposed urban development occupies part of the former swamp footprint. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • There is an opportunity to fully restore burrung buluk and Meade Swamp with original waterway alignments. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Restoring burrung buluk and Meade Swamp would require significant hydrological restoration works. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Melbourne Water prepared additional 100 ARI flood modelling during the feasibility study. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • The 100 ARI flood extent aligns with the historic extent of Herne Swamp according to Nature Glenelg Trust modelling. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Land in a floodway or subject to 100 ARI inundation is constrained for urban development unless major works are undertaken. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Flood-constrained land can retain capacity for open space, biodiversity and conservation uses. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Urbanisation will increase stormwater runoff and flood risk. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Improved natural water regime and stormwater management can reduce flooding downstream in Merri and Darebin Creeks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Soils

  • Sodic soils are strongly present across the study area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Sodic soils have low strength in water and create compaction, weak foundation, tunnel erosion and gully erosion risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • The Wallan floodplain formed over alluvial floodplain deposits. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • The Quaternary volcanic plain formed over Newer Volcanic deposits. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Subsoils over alluvial floodplain deposits in the Wallan Wetlands have high dispersibility. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Subsoils over volcanic deposits have low dispersibility. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Dispersive soils may be encountered over a large proportion of the study area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Biodiversity

  • Nature Advisory undertook a biodiversity overview assessment in 2020. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Alluvium prepared a Wallan-Beveridge Waterway Assessment for Melbourne Water in 2021. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • The 2005 current extent of pre-1750 EVCs is severely diminished. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Most study-area vegetation communities are Endangered or Vulnerable in Victorian conservation status. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • The EPBC Act lists five threatened ecological communities in the study area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Victorian Biodiversity Atlas records indicate 12 EPBC Act listed species and 10 FFG Act listed species in the study area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Species records occur mainly near the Melbourne-Seymour railway line and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Golden Sun Moth records occur in the north-western portion of the study area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Native vegetation is present around Spring Hill, Camerons Lane, Hume Freeway, Merri Creek, the north-west study area and the railway line. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Herb-rich Foothill Forest and Grassy Dry Forest remnants in the north-west are conservation-value remnants. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Scattered River Red Gums occur in paddocks at the north-western foothills. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Plains Grassy Wetland occurs in burrung buluk. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • The southern portion of burrung buluk qualifies as very high quality Seasonal Herbaceous Wetland. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Merri Creek is important Growling Grass Frog and Golden Sun Moth habitat under the Melbourne Strategic Assessment. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Meade Swamp contains medium-quality Plains Grassy Wetland. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Latham’s Snipe was observed at Meade Swamp in October 2020. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Wallan South ecological assessment found 134.586 hectares of native vegetation. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Wallan South ecological assessment found 180 scattered trees. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Wallan South native vegetation covered seven EVCs. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Wallan South proposed a 228 hectare retention area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • 15.334 hectares of native vegetation sit outside the Wallan South retention area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • 131 scattered trees sit outside the Wallan South retention area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • 2.226 hectares of Golden Sun Moth habitat sit outside the Wallan South retention area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Cultural Heritage

  • The Cultural Heritage Sensitivity Overlay does not accurately represent Wurundjeri Woi-wurrung cultural values. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Further investigation is required to understand Wurundjeri Woi-wurrung cultural values. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • A detailed Cultural Values Study by WWCHAC is needed to identify significant Aboriginal cultural places and objects. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • The visitor guide acknowledges Wurundjeri People as Traditional Owners of Wallan and surrounds. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
  • The Council and Health Plan states Mitchell Shire is on Taungurung and Wurundjeri Woi-wurrung traditional lands. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)

Transport

  • Mitchell has a high commuter workforce relying heavily on regional rail and road networks. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
  • Many people still commute to Melbourne for work, especially from southern growth areas. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • Around 15 percent of residents now work from home. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • Council Plan initiative 3.5.1 advocates for critical road infrastructure and upgrades. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • Council Plan initiative 3.5.2 advocates for critical public transport infrastructure including Beveridge Train Station. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • Council Plan initiative 3.5.3 is to maintain and renew local roads. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • Council Plan initiative 3.5.4 continues Missing Links footpaths and shared paths. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • Council Plan initiative 3.5.5 increases bicycle and active transport infrastructure. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • Council Plan initiative 3.5.6 plans and delivers local road transport infrastructure for growing communities. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • Engagement participants called for Hume Freeway duplication and lane alternatives. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
  • An engagement participant said traffic from Wallan to Epping is a nightmare. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
  • An engagement participant called for lane alternatives on Old Sydney Road and Merriang Road. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)

Town Centre

  • The Wallan Free Library and Mechanics Institute Hall sits in Wallan’s town heart outside Hadfield Park. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
  • The Mechanics Institute building was established in 1877. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
  • The Mechanics Institute building remains used by the local community. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
  • Hadfield Park contains the Community Bank Adventure Playground and Splash Park. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
  • The Hadfield Park adventure playground includes a five-storey tower. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
  • The Hadfield Park splash park is fully accessible, open in summer and free. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
  • Wallan Olde Time Market runs on the second Saturday of each month from Hadfield Park. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
  • Wallan Craft Market runs with the Wallan Olde Time Market. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
  • Wallan World War One Memorial is a grey granite monolith. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
  • Wallan Avenue of Honour originally commemorated 53 veterans. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
  • Taylors Creek Walking Track runs from King William Drive to Taylors Lane. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
  • Taylors Creek hosts a playground at Lisa Place. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
  • Taylors Creek is a tributary of Merri Creek. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
  • Taylors Creek rises on the southern slopes of Pretty Sally. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
  • Taylors Creek flows through Wallan’s rapidly developing northern fringe. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
  • Taylors Creek flows through swamps before joining Merri Creek. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
  • Council Plan objective 5.1 is attractive town centres that are safe and vibrant. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • Council Plan initiative 5.1.1 is to activate and revitalise town centres and increase tenancy. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)

Housing

  • The Affordable Housing Strategy states that thousands of Mitchell households are in housing stress. (Source: msc-affordable-housing-strategy-final-oct-2023.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-affordable-housing-strategy-final-oct-2023.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-affordable-housing-strategy-final-oct-2023.txt)
  • Housing stress leaves less for transport, education supplies, health, food and utilities. (Source: msc-affordable-housing-strategy-final-oct-2023.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-affordable-housing-strategy-final-oct-2023.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-affordable-housing-strategy-final-oct-2023.txt)
  • Affordable-housing demand will increase as Mitchell grows. (Source: msc-affordable-housing-strategy-final-oct-2023.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-affordable-housing-strategy-final-oct-2023.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-affordable-housing-strategy-final-oct-2023.txt)
  • Council wants affordable housing in townships and suburbs with access to services and social infrastructure. (Source: msc-affordable-housing-strategy-final-oct-2023.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-affordable-housing-strategy-final-oct-2023.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-affordable-housing-strategy-final-oct-2023.txt)
  • Council wants affordable housing to be well-designed with good amenity and urban design outcomes. (Source: msc-affordable-housing-strategy-final-oct-2023.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-affordable-housing-strategy-final-oct-2023.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-affordable-housing-strategy-final-oct-2023.txt)
  • Council wants affordable housing connected to support services in vibrant and cohesive communities. (Source: msc-affordable-housing-strategy-final-oct-2023.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-affordable-housing-strategy-final-oct-2023.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-affordable-housing-strategy-final-oct-2023.txt)
  • Affordable Housing is housing, including social housing, for very low, low and moderate income households. (Source: msc-affordable-housing-strategy-final-oct-2023.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-affordable-housing-strategy-final-oct-2023.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-affordable-housing-strategy-final-oct-2023.txt)
  • 72 percent of Mitchell households were purchasing or fully owned their home. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
  • 17.8 percent of Mitchell households were renting privately. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
  • 2.0 percent of Mitchell households were living in social housing. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
  • Households increased by 3,281 between 2016 and 2021. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
  • Couples with children increased by 1,193 households from 2016 to 2021. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
  • Couples without children increased by 954 households from 2016 to 2021. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
  • Lone-person households increased by 769 from 2016 to 2021. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
  • One-parent family households increased by 417 from 2016 to 2021. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
  • There were 117 people experiencing homelessness in Mitchell Shire. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
  • 13.7 percent of people experiencing homelessness were living in improvised dwellings, tents or sleeping out. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)

Health

  • 22.3 percent of Mitchell residents experience high or very high psychological distress, compared with 19.1 percent in Victoria. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
  • 26.1 percent of Mitchell residents experience loneliness, compared with 23.3 percent in Victoria. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
  • 66.5 percent of Mitchell residents have BMI over 25, compared with 54.4 percent in Victoria. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
  • 33.2 percent of Mitchell residents have BMI over 30, compared with 23.0 percent in Victoria. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
  • 21.6 percent of Mitchell residents get no physical activity, compared with 16.8 percent in Victoria. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
  • 43.3 percent of Mitchell residents consume sugar-sweetened beverages daily or several times per week, compared with 34.4 percent in Victoria. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
  • 8.0 percent of Mitchell residents vape daily, compared with 4.5 percent in Victoria. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
  • 13.6 percent of Mitchell residents smoke daily, compared with 10 percent in Victoria. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
  • 8.0 percent of Mitchell residents ran out of food and could not afford more. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
  • 11.2 percent of Mitchell residents worried about running out of money to buy food. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
  • Mitchell family-violence rate is 2,371 per 100,000, compared with 1,418 per 100,000 in Victoria. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
  • 60 percent of Mitchell residents feel prepared to cope with extreme weather events. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)

Community Infrastructure

  • Council Plan initiative 3.2.2 continues the Community Infrastructure Program for community hubs and sports/recreation facilities in growth areas and townships. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • Council Plan initiative 3.2.4 participates in Northern Corridor health services and infrastructure planning. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • Council Plan initiative 3.2.5 protects and supports expansion of health and community services. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • Council Plan initiative 3.2.6 facilitates three- and four-year-old kindergarten reforms with a focus on infrastructure and service provision. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • The Council and Health Plan references Wallan East Family and Children’s Community Centre. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)

Sport

  • The Sports Field Feasibility Study guides active sporting reserves and supporting infrastructure. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
  • The sports study focused on greenfield sites in Mitchell South facing significant growth in the next 5 to 10 years. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
  • The sports study expected most twenty-year growth to occur in Wallan and Beveridge. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
  • The sports study expected more young families in new Wallan and Beveridge housing estates. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
  • The sports study expected more diverse sport and recreation needs. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
  • The sports study said Australian Rules, netball and cricket may be challenged by emerging sports such as soccer. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
  • The sports study developed concept plans for the Wallan/Beveridge sub-region. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
  • New sports fields should be zoned Public Park and Recreation Zone or be on school land. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
  • Sports fields should use the adopted hierarchy to guide land, amenities, car parking, location and planning triggers. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
  • Sports facilities should be on unencumbered land in visible locations with good public transport and compatible adjacent uses. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
  • Sports facility design should promote open access, visibility, multiple street frontages and passive surveillance. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
  • Sports facility design should incorporate universal, environmentally sustainable and water-sensitive urban design. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
  • Playing surfaces should optimise training, competition and casual use through surface, irrigation, drainage and lighting. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
  • Sports facilities should remain flexible for medium- and long-term changes in community needs. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
  • Council Plan initiative 3.1.5 is fair and equitable access to aquatic facilities. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • Council Plan initiative 3.1.6 is to plan and deliver recreation facilities for growing communities. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • Engagement submissions called for a swimming leisure centre at Wallan. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
  • Engagement submissions said Wallan and Beveridge need a new indoor/outdoor pool. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)

Economy

  • More than 14,000 local jobs are supported across construction, healthcare, education, retail, public safety and manufacturing. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • Mitchell has over 4,300 registered businesses. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • Council Plan initiative 1.1.2 ensures sufficient and appropriate industrial and employment land. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • Council Plan initiative 1.2.1 supports local employment and education pathways. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • Council Plan initiative 1.2.2 partners on opportunities related to the Beveridge Intermodal Precinct. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • Council Plan initiative 1.4.1 supports employment precinct partnerships including Hilldene, Broadford Industrial, Merrifield Employment PSP and Northern Freight PSP. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • Engagement participants called for business hubs and better working conditions in Wallan. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)

Contested Issues

  • Panel members were divided over whether the Community Vision should be aspirational or rewritten to reflect health statistics and Council capacity. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
  • Some panel members wanted farms and farming to have greater emphasis. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
  • Panel messages showed tension between preserving older assets and developing assets to attract investment and growth. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
  • Panel messages called for public assets to be protected and upgraded. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
  • Panel messages said older assets can create tourism draw and be maintained by community groups. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
  • Panel messages asked Council to investigate a separate asset fund funded by a rates surcharge. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
  • Panel messages asked for transparency about assets that cost the most and generate least. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
  • Panel messages said leisure services may not be big earners but are vital for health and connection. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
  • Panel messages called for consultation before Council removes or alters assets. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
  • Panel messages repeatedly prioritised roads. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
  • Panel messages called for a link bus between townships for business, youth, older residents and tourism. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
  • Panel messages called for more recreation, leisure and community activities. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
  • Panel messages called for support for local business, tourism, activities and events. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
  • Panel messages called for clear, honest and timely Council information. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
  • Panel messages said consultation is good but there is little evidence Council takes notice. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
  • Panel messages called for engagement with Aboriginal community members living in the Shire. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
  • A submission raised health concerns from dust if the Wallan quarry proceeds. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
  • A submission referred to Wallan Quarry and 20 workers if it proceeds. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
  • Submissions raised water, infrastructure and power for high-growth, high-density areas. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
  • A submission said retaining country feel is impossible with growth. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)

Delivery

  • Park land should transfer through an Infrastructure Contribution Plan or as encumbered open space where possible. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • The ICP system is specific about what land can be public-purpose land. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • A large portion of the regional park will be environmentally encumbered land. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Park land transfer under PSP/ICP would likely be gradual as land is subdivided across precincts. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Batches of large continuous land transfers would avoid connectivity and access issues for land managers. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Land not transferable under PSP/ICP should be reserved with a Public Acquisition Overlay. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • A Public Acquisition Overlay would protect land from inappropriate use and development and avoid value uplift. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • GAIC works-in-kind should be explored for transfer of land from developers to the State. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • GAIC works-in-kind will not fund works outside the Urban Growth Boundary. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Land identified for the park should be zoned through the PSP process and transferred under ICPs where possible. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Any land Victorian Government must purchase should be purchased as soon as practicable to avoid value uplift. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Quarry sites require rehabilitation before incorporation into the park. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Quarry rehabilitation plans must consult Wurundjeri Woi-wurrung people. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Most future park land will be managed by Parks Victoria and WWCHAC. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Waterways with Growling Grass Frog habitat will likely be managed by Melbourne Water. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This evidence changes Wallan planning by altering land budget, infrastructure sequencing, public-land need, service timing, movement demand, environmental risk, social licence or lifecycle cost. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Development feasibility implication: The structure plan should convert this evidence into mapped controls, delivery triggers, contribution items, design standards, advocacy priorities, monitoring requirements or explicit residual risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Staging Logic

    1. Evidence lock: Confirm the missing original Wallan Structure Plan, Wallan South PSP, Wallan East PSP documents, amendments, panel reports and submission summaries. (Source: local corpus search)
    • Dependency: Each stage changes developable area, infrastructure cost, ownership, social licence, sequencing or service timing. (Source: local corpus search)
    1. Cultural values: Complete WWCHAC cultural-values work before fixing park boundaries, drainage corridors and road alignments. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Dependency: Each stage changes developable area, infrastructure cost, ownership, social licence, sequencing or service timing. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    1. Flood baseline: Use Melbourne Water 100 ARI modelling and wetland extents as hard inputs to land budget and road/drainage design. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Dependency: Each stage changes developable area, infrastructure cost, ownership, social licence, sequencing or service timing. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    1. Biodiversity surveys: Update private-land biodiversity assessments because the 2020 survey was limited to publicly accessible roads. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Dependency: Each stage changes developable area, infrastructure cost, ownership, social licence, sequencing or service timing. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    1. Park assembly: Identify ICP land, encumbered open space, PAO land and possible GAIC works-in-kind land before subdivision fragments ownership. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Dependency: Each stage changes developable area, infrastructure cost, ownership, social licence, sequencing or service timing. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    1. Transport triggers: Tie housing release to road, public transport and active-transport milestones because commuter pressure is already contested. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Dependency: Each stage changes developable area, infrastructure cost, ownership, social licence, sequencing or service timing. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    1. Community infrastructure: Reserve land and funding for hubs, sport, kindergarten, aquatics and health before Wallan reaches 29,601 people by 2036. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Dependency: Each stage changes developable area, infrastructure cost, ownership, social licence, sequencing or service timing. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    1. Town-centre integration: Connect new estates to High Street, Hadfield Park, Taylors Creek and station access so growth reinforces Wallan’s centre. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Dependency: Each stage changes developable area, infrastructure cost, ownership, social licence, sequencing or service timing. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    1. Lifecycle budget: Model maintenance and renewal before accepting new roads, parks, paths, drains, buildings and sports fields. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Dependency: Each stage changes developable area, infrastructure cost, ownership, social licence, sequencing or service timing. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    1. Structure-plan review: Use Council Plan initiative 3.4.2 to review and implement township structure plans as required. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Dependency: Each stage changes developable area, infrastructure cost, ownership, social licence, sequencing or service timing. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)

Cross References

Evidence Ledger

  • Ledger 1.818: Spatial Frame — Wallan is located in the south of Mitchell Shire. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
  • Ledger 1.821: Spatial Frame — Wallan and surrounds are just under one hour north of Melbourne by the Hume Freeway or V/Line train service. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
  • Ledger 1.824: Spatial Frame — The visitor guide gives Wallan to Melbourne as 61.8 kilometres and 52 minutes. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
  • Ledger 1.827: Spatial Frame — The visitor guide gives Wallan to Albury as 269.6 kilometres and 2 hours 39 minutes. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
  • Ledger 1.830: Spatial Frame — The visitor guide gives Wallan to Bendigo as 108.5 kilometres and 1 hour 20 minutes. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
  • Ledger 1.833: Spatial Frame — The visitor guide gives Wallan to Shepparton as 131.5 kilometres and 1 hour 24 minutes. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
  • Ledger 1.836: Spatial Frame — The visitor guide gives Wallan to Ballarat as 131.7 kilometres and 1 hour 38 minutes. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
  • Ledger 1.839: Spatial Frame — Historically, Wallan was a rural village used as a rest stop before travellers climbed Pretty Sally Hill and crossed the Great Dividing Range. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
  • Ledger 1.842: Spatial Frame — The regional-park study area is primarily in Mitchell Shire and includes a south-eastern portion in the City of Whittlesea. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.845: Spatial Frame — The study area is on Wurundjeri Woi-wurrung land and the entire area is culturally significant. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.848: Spatial Frame — The study area includes Mt Fraser, Spring Hill and Green Hill. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.851: Spatial Frame — The study area includes Herne Swamp, Meade Swamp and burrung buluk, formerly Hanna Swamp. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.854: Spatial Frame — The study area includes the northern reaches of Merri Creek, whose headwaters are further north at Heathcote Junction. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.857: Spatial Frame — The study area includes the buffer around the Wallan sewage treatment facility. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.860: Spatial Frame — The study area includes flood-mitigation land in the upper Merri catchment. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.863: Spatial Frame — The study area includes wooded slopes west of Wallan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.866: Growth Arithmetic — Wallan 2025 population is 18,758. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
  • Ledger 1.869: Growth Arithmetic — Wallan 2045 population is 49,123. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
  • Ledger 1.872: Growth Arithmetic — Wallan 2025-to-2045 growth is 161.9 percent. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
  • Ledger 1.875: Growth Arithmetic — Wallan 2036 population is 29,601 in the Council and Health Plan. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • Ledger 1.878: Growth Arithmetic — Wallan 2046 population is 51,539 in the Council and Health Plan. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • Ledger 1.881: Growth Arithmetic — Beveridge 2025 population is 9,082. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
  • Ledger 1.884: Growth Arithmetic — Beveridge 2045 population is 104,066. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
  • Ledger 1.887: Growth Arithmetic — Beveridge 2025-to-2045 growth is 1,045.9 percent. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
  • Ledger 1.890: Growth Arithmetic — Kilmore-Kilmore East grows from 12,269 people in 2025 to 24,000 people in 2045. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
  • Ledger 1.893: Growth Arithmetic — Mitchell Shire grows from 64,175 people in 2025 to 209,508 people in 2045. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
  • Ledger 1.896: Growth Arithmetic — The Council and Health Plan expects Mitchell to reach 221,638 people by 2046. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • Ledger 1.899: Growth Arithmetic — Mitchell had about 14 babies born per week in 2023-2024. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
  • Ledger 1.902: Growth Arithmetic — Mitchell is expected to have around 36 babies born per week by 2041. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
  • Ledger 1.905: Structure Plan Mechanism — The Growth Corridor Plans guide residential districts, industrial and employment areas, and open-space networks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.908: Structure Plan Mechanism — The Growth Corridor Plans identify areas of high environmental or landscape value that must be protected from development. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.911: Structure Plan Mechanism — The Growth Corridor Plans identify constrained land, including flood-prone land, not expected to be developable. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.914: Structure Plan Mechanism — The Growth Corridor Plans define integrated open-space networks for amenity, recreation, natural-feature protection, heritage, biodiversity and healthy waterways. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.917: Structure Plan Mechanism — The three relevant Growth Corridor Plan principles are high amenity and character, protection of biodiversity-waterways-cultural heritage, and integrated open-space networks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.920: Structure Plan Mechanism — Approved precinct structure plans in the study context include Lockerbie, Lockerbie North and Beveridge Central. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.923: Structure Plan Mechanism — Precincts undergoing PSP planning in the study context include Beveridge North West, Wallan South and Wallan East part 1. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.926: Structure Plan Mechanism — Precincts yet to undergo PSP planning in the study context include Wallan East part 2, Merrifield North, Beveridge South West, Northern Freight and Beveridge North East. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.929: Structure Plan Mechanism — Council Plan initiative 3.4.2 is to review and implement township structure plans as required. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • Ledger 1.932: Infrastructure Funding — The ten-year Asset Plan allocates approximately 79 percent, or $573 million, of capital budget to growth-supporting investment. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
  • Ledger 1.935: Infrastructure Funding — The ten-year Asset Plan allocates 21 percent, or $155 million, to preserving existing assets. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
  • Ledger 1.938: Infrastructure Funding — The capital program includes 528 million for new assets, 155 million for renewal and $45 million for upgrade and expansion. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
  • Ledger 1.941: Infrastructure Funding — Annual renewal investment rises from 9.7 million in 2025-2026 to 19.1 million in 2034-2035. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
  • Ledger 1.944: Infrastructure Funding — Growth-related investments are funded predominantly by grants, developer contributions and borrowing, with minimal reliance on Council cash. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
  • Ledger 1.947: Infrastructure Funding — Developers cover the majority of upfront costs for new growth. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
  • Ledger 1.950: Infrastructure Funding — Council is responsible for ongoing maintenance and service delivery over the asset life. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
  • Ledger 1.953: Infrastructure Funding — Growth, asset renewal and geography are the top three challenges in the Asset Plan. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
  • Ledger 1.956: Regional Park — The Victorian Government committed in 2018 to a feasibility study for a regional park in Wallan within the Northern Growth Corridor. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.959: Regional Park — The wallan wallan Regional Park feasibility project was led by the Department of Energy, Environment and Climate Action. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.962: Regional Park — The Wurundjeri Woi-wurrung name for the Wallan region is wallan wallan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.965: Regional Park — The future park name will be determined by Wurundjeri Woi-wurrung people. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.968: Regional Park — Regional parks are large open spaces with natural or semi-natural surroundings near urban environments. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.971: Regional Park — Regional parks have high landscape, biodiversity and cultural values. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.974: Regional Park — Regional parks provide passive recreation, education and tourism opportunities. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.977: Regional Park — The future park has an anticipated catchment of 15 kilometres from park boundaries. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.980: Regional Park — The 15 kilometre catchment would serve at least 230,000 people in 2021. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.983: Regional Park — The 15 kilometre catchment would serve approximately 430,000 people by 2036. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.986: Regional Park — Growth-corridor regional park planning uses at least 40 hectares of passive open space for every 150,000 people. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.989: Regional Park — New regional parks generally take 10 to 15 years to establish. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.992: Regional Park — The potential park may be as large as 1,000 hectares. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.995: Regional Park — Council Plan initiative 3.1.2 advocates for Wallan Wallan Regional Parklands. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • Ledger 1.998: Regional Park — The park should incorporate representative elements of Wallan environmental character. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1001: Regional Park — The park should protect environmental values through conservation outcomes. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1004: Regional Park — The park should reflect the cultural landscape and areas of high cultural heritage significance. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1007: Regional Park — The park should respond to anticipated 100 ARI flood levels. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1010: Regional Park — The park should connect different features into an immersive park-user experience. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1013: Regional Park — The park should connect with other regional open space. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1016: Regional Park — The park should respond to anticipated future urban growth form and activity. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1019: Regional Park — The park should recognise future transport access potential and barriers. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1022: Regional Park — The park should recognise utility service corridors and asset locations. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1025: Regional Park — The park should respond to accessibility requirements of a diverse community. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1028: Flood And Water — Study-area waterways include upper Merri Creek, Kalkallo Creek, Strathaird Creek and Taylors Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1031: Flood And Water — Merri Creek upper reaches, Taylors Creek, Strathaird Creek and Kalkallo Creek have been channelised. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1034: Flood And Water — Herne Swamp, burrung buluk and Meade Swamp are seasonal or ephemeral wetlands. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1037: Flood And Water — The wetlands have been drained for agriculture but low-lying areas remain subject to inundation during heavy rainfall. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1040: Flood And Water — The full extent of wetlands remains to be determined through separate investigation. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1043: Flood And Water — Herne Swamp is hydrologically constrained because new and proposed urban development occupies part of the former swamp footprint. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1046: Flood And Water — There is an opportunity to fully restore burrung buluk and Meade Swamp with original waterway alignments. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1049: Flood And Water — Restoring burrung buluk and Meade Swamp would require significant hydrological restoration works. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1052: Flood And Water — Melbourne Water prepared additional 100 ARI flood modelling during the feasibility study. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1055: Flood And Water — The 100 ARI flood extent aligns with the historic extent of Herne Swamp according to Nature Glenelg Trust modelling. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1058: Flood And Water — Land in a floodway or subject to 100 ARI inundation is constrained for urban development unless major works are undertaken. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1061: Flood And Water — Flood-constrained land can retain capacity for open space, biodiversity and conservation uses. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1064: Flood And Water — Urbanisation will increase stormwater runoff and flood risk. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1067: Flood And Water — Improved natural water regime and stormwater management can reduce flooding downstream in Merri and Darebin Creeks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1070: Soils — Sodic soils are strongly present across the study area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1073: Soils — Sodic soils have low strength in water and create compaction, weak foundation, tunnel erosion and gully erosion risks. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1076: Soils — The Wallan floodplain formed over alluvial floodplain deposits. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1079: Soils — The Quaternary volcanic plain formed over Newer Volcanic deposits. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1082: Soils — Subsoils over alluvial floodplain deposits in the Wallan Wetlands have high dispersibility. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1085: Soils — Subsoils over volcanic deposits have low dispersibility. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1088: Soils — Dispersive soils may be encountered over a large proportion of the study area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1091: Biodiversity — Nature Advisory undertook a biodiversity overview assessment in 2020. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1094: Biodiversity — Alluvium prepared a Wallan-Beveridge Waterway Assessment for Melbourne Water in 2021. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1097: Biodiversity — The 2005 current extent of pre-1750 EVCs is severely diminished. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1100: Biodiversity — Most study-area vegetation communities are Endangered or Vulnerable in Victorian conservation status. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1103: Biodiversity — The EPBC Act lists five threatened ecological communities in the study area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1106: Biodiversity — Victorian Biodiversity Atlas records indicate 12 EPBC Act listed species and 10 FFG Act listed species in the study area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1109: Biodiversity — Species records occur mainly near the Melbourne-Seymour railway line and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1112: Biodiversity — Golden Sun Moth records occur in the north-western portion of the study area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1115: Biodiversity — Native vegetation is present around Spring Hill, Camerons Lane, Hume Freeway, Merri Creek, the north-west study area and the railway line. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1118: Biodiversity — Herb-rich Foothill Forest and Grassy Dry Forest remnants in the north-west are conservation-value remnants. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1121: Biodiversity — Scattered River Red Gums occur in paddocks at the north-western foothills. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1124: Biodiversity — Plains Grassy Wetland occurs in burrung buluk. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1127: Biodiversity — The southern portion of burrung buluk qualifies as very high quality Seasonal Herbaceous Wetland. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1130: Biodiversity — Merri Creek is important Growling Grass Frog and Golden Sun Moth habitat under the Melbourne Strategic Assessment. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1133: Biodiversity — Meade Swamp contains medium-quality Plains Grassy Wetland. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1136: Biodiversity — Latham’s Snipe was observed at Meade Swamp in October 2020. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1139: Biodiversity — Wallan South ecological assessment found 134.586 hectares of native vegetation. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1142: Biodiversity — Wallan South ecological assessment found 180 scattered trees. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1145: Biodiversity — Wallan South native vegetation covered seven EVCs. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1148: Biodiversity — Wallan South proposed a 228 hectare retention area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1151: Biodiversity — 15.334 hectares of native vegetation sit outside the Wallan South retention area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1154: Biodiversity — 131 scattered trees sit outside the Wallan South retention area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1157: Biodiversity — 2.226 hectares of Golden Sun Moth habitat sit outside the Wallan South retention area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1160: Cultural Heritage — The Cultural Heritage Sensitivity Overlay does not accurately represent Wurundjeri Woi-wurrung cultural values. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1163: Cultural Heritage — Further investigation is required to understand Wurundjeri Woi-wurrung cultural values. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1166: Cultural Heritage — A detailed Cultural Values Study by WWCHAC is needed to identify significant Aboriginal cultural places and objects. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1169: Cultural Heritage — The visitor guide acknowledges Wurundjeri People as Traditional Owners of Wallan and surrounds. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1172: Cultural Heritage — The Council and Health Plan states Mitchell Shire is on Taungurung and Wurundjeri Woi-wurrung traditional lands. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1175: Transport — Mitchell has a high commuter workforce relying heavily on regional rail and road networks. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1178: Transport — Many people still commute to Melbourne for work, especially from southern growth areas. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1181: Transport — Around 15 percent of residents now work from home. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1184: Transport — Council Plan initiative 3.5.1 advocates for critical road infrastructure and upgrades. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1187: Transport — Council Plan initiative 3.5.2 advocates for critical public transport infrastructure including Beveridge Train Station. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1190: Transport — Council Plan initiative 3.5.3 is to maintain and renew local roads. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1193: Transport — Council Plan initiative 3.5.4 continues Missing Links footpaths and shared paths. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1196: Transport — Council Plan initiative 3.5.5 increases bicycle and active transport infrastructure. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1199: Transport — Council Plan initiative 3.5.6 plans and delivers local road transport infrastructure for growing communities. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1202: Transport — Engagement participants called for Hume Freeway duplication and lane alternatives. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1205: Transport — An engagement participant said traffic from Wallan to Epping is a nightmare. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1208: Transport — An engagement participant called for lane alternatives on Old Sydney Road and Merriang Road. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1211: Town Centre — The Wallan Free Library and Mechanics Institute Hall sits in Wallan’s town heart outside Hadfield Park. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1214: Town Centre — The Mechanics Institute building was established in 1877. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1217: Town Centre — The Mechanics Institute building remains used by the local community. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1220: Town Centre — Hadfield Park contains the Community Bank Adventure Playground and Splash Park. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1223: Town Centre — The Hadfield Park adventure playground includes a five-storey tower. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1226: Town Centre — The Hadfield Park splash park is fully accessible, open in summer and free. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1229: Town Centre — Wallan Olde Time Market runs on the second Saturday of each month from Hadfield Park. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1232: Town Centre — Wallan Craft Market runs with the Wallan Olde Time Market. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1235: Town Centre — Wallan World War One Memorial is a grey granite monolith. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1238: Town Centre — Wallan Avenue of Honour originally commemorated 53 veterans. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1241: Town Centre — Taylors Creek Walking Track runs from King William Drive to Taylors Lane. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1244: Town Centre — Taylors Creek hosts a playground at Lisa Place. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1247: Town Centre — Taylors Creek is a tributary of Merri Creek. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1250: Town Centre — Taylors Creek rises on the southern slopes of Pretty Sally. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1253: Town Centre — Taylors Creek flows through Wallan’s rapidly developing northern fringe. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1256: Town Centre — Taylors Creek flows through swamps before joining Merri Creek. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1259: Town Centre — Council Plan objective 5.1 is attractive town centres that are safe and vibrant. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1262: Town Centre — Council Plan initiative 5.1.1 is to activate and revitalise town centres and increase tenancy. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1265: Housing — The Affordable Housing Strategy states that thousands of Mitchell households are in housing stress. (Source: msc-affordable-housing-strategy-final-oct-2023.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-affordable-housing-strategy-final-oct-2023.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-affordable-housing-strategy-final-oct-2023.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1268: Housing — Housing stress leaves less for transport, education supplies, health, food and utilities. (Source: msc-affordable-housing-strategy-final-oct-2023.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-affordable-housing-strategy-final-oct-2023.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-affordable-housing-strategy-final-oct-2023.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1271: Housing — Affordable-housing demand will increase as Mitchell grows. (Source: msc-affordable-housing-strategy-final-oct-2023.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-affordable-housing-strategy-final-oct-2023.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-affordable-housing-strategy-final-oct-2023.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1274: Housing — Council wants affordable housing in townships and suburbs with access to services and social infrastructure. (Source: msc-affordable-housing-strategy-final-oct-2023.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-affordable-housing-strategy-final-oct-2023.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-affordable-housing-strategy-final-oct-2023.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1277: Housing — Council wants affordable housing to be well-designed with good amenity and urban design outcomes. (Source: msc-affordable-housing-strategy-final-oct-2023.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-affordable-housing-strategy-final-oct-2023.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-affordable-housing-strategy-final-oct-2023.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1280: Housing — Council wants affordable housing connected to support services in vibrant and cohesive communities. (Source: msc-affordable-housing-strategy-final-oct-2023.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-affordable-housing-strategy-final-oct-2023.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-affordable-housing-strategy-final-oct-2023.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1283: Housing — Affordable Housing is housing, including social housing, for very low, low and moderate income households. (Source: msc-affordable-housing-strategy-final-oct-2023.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-affordable-housing-strategy-final-oct-2023.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-affordable-housing-strategy-final-oct-2023.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1286: Housing — 72 percent of Mitchell households were purchasing or fully owned their home. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1289: Housing — 17.8 percent of Mitchell households were renting privately. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1292: Housing — 2.0 percent of Mitchell households were living in social housing. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1295: Housing — Households increased by 3,281 between 2016 and 2021. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1298: Housing — Couples with children increased by 1,193 households from 2016 to 2021. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1301: Housing — Couples without children increased by 954 households from 2016 to 2021. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1304: Housing — Lone-person households increased by 769 from 2016 to 2021. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1307: Housing — One-parent family households increased by 417 from 2016 to 2021. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1310: Housing — There were 117 people experiencing homelessness in Mitchell Shire. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1313: Housing — 13.7 percent of people experiencing homelessness were living in improvised dwellings, tents or sleeping out. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1316: Health — 22.3 percent of Mitchell residents experience high or very high psychological distress, compared with 19.1 percent in Victoria. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1319: Health — 26.1 percent of Mitchell residents experience loneliness, compared with 23.3 percent in Victoria. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1322: Health — 66.5 percent of Mitchell residents have BMI over 25, compared with 54.4 percent in Victoria. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1325: Health — 33.2 percent of Mitchell residents have BMI over 30, compared with 23.0 percent in Victoria. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1328: Health — 21.6 percent of Mitchell residents get no physical activity, compared with 16.8 percent in Victoria. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1331: Health — 43.3 percent of Mitchell residents consume sugar-sweetened beverages daily or several times per week, compared with 34.4 percent in Victoria. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1334: Health — 8.0 percent of Mitchell residents vape daily, compared with 4.5 percent in Victoria. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1337: Health — 13.6 percent of Mitchell residents smoke daily, compared with 10 percent in Victoria. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1340: Health — 8.0 percent of Mitchell residents ran out of food and could not afford more. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1343: Health — 11.2 percent of Mitchell residents worried about running out of money to buy food. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1346: Health — Mitchell family-violence rate is 2,371 per 100,000, compared with 1,418 per 100,000 in Victoria. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1349: Health — 60 percent of Mitchell residents feel prepared to cope with extreme weather events. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-health-profile-28-05-2025-1.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1352: Community Infrastructure — Council Plan initiative 3.2.2 continues the Community Infrastructure Program for community hubs and sports/recreation facilities in growth areas and townships. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1355: Community Infrastructure — Council Plan initiative 3.2.4 participates in Northern Corridor health services and infrastructure planning. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1358: Community Infrastructure — Council Plan initiative 3.2.5 protects and supports expansion of health and community services. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1361: Community Infrastructure — Council Plan initiative 3.2.6 facilitates three- and four-year-old kindergarten reforms with a focus on infrastructure and service provision. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1364: Community Infrastructure — The Council and Health Plan references Wallan East Family and Children’s Community Centre. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1367: Sport — The Sports Field Feasibility Study guides active sporting reserves and supporting infrastructure. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1370: Sport — The sports study focused on greenfield sites in Mitchell South facing significant growth in the next 5 to 10 years. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1373: Sport — The sports study expected most twenty-year growth to occur in Wallan and Beveridge. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1376: Sport — The sports study expected more young families in new Wallan and Beveridge housing estates. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1379: Sport — The sports study expected more diverse sport and recreation needs. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1382: Sport — The sports study said Australian Rules, netball and cricket may be challenged by emerging sports such as soccer. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1385: Sport — The sports study developed concept plans for the Wallan/Beveridge sub-region. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1388: Sport — New sports fields should be zoned Public Park and Recreation Zone or be on school land. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1391: Sport — Sports fields should use the adopted hierarchy to guide land, amenities, car parking, location and planning triggers. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1394: Sport — Sports facilities should be on unencumbered land in visible locations with good public transport and compatible adjacent uses. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1397: Sport — Sports facility design should promote open access, visibility, multiple street frontages and passive surveillance. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1400: Sport — Sports facility design should incorporate universal, environmentally sustainable and water-sensitive urban design. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1403: Sport — Playing surfaces should optimise training, competition and casual use through surface, irrigation, drainage and lighting. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1406: Sport — Sports facilities should remain flexible for medium- and long-term changes in community needs. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1409: Sport — Council Plan initiative 3.1.5 is fair and equitable access to aquatic facilities. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1412: Sport — Council Plan initiative 3.1.6 is to plan and deliver recreation facilities for growing communities. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1415: Sport — Engagement submissions called for a swimming leisure centre at Wallan. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1418: Sport — Engagement submissions said Wallan and Beveridge need a new indoor/outdoor pool. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1421: Economy — More than 14,000 local jobs are supported across construction, healthcare, education, retail, public safety and manufacturing. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1424: Economy — Mitchell has over 4,300 registered businesses. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1427: Economy — Council Plan initiative 1.1.2 ensures sufficient and appropriate industrial and employment land. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1430: Economy — Council Plan initiative 1.2.1 supports local employment and education pathways. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1433: Economy — Council Plan initiative 1.2.2 partners on opportunities related to the Beveridge Intermodal Precinct. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1436: Economy — Council Plan initiative 1.4.1 supports employment precinct partnerships including Hilldene, Broadford Industrial, Merrifield Employment PSP and Northern Freight PSP. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc_council-and-health-plan-2025-2029_final_web.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1439: Economy — Engagement participants called for business hubs and better working conditions in Wallan. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1442: Contested Issues — Panel members were divided over whether the Community Vision should be aspirational or rewritten to reflect health statistics and Council capacity. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1445: Contested Issues — Some panel members wanted farms and farming to have greater emphasis. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1448: Contested Issues — Panel messages showed tension between preserving older assets and developing assets to attract investment and growth. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1451: Contested Issues — Panel messages called for public assets to be protected and upgraded. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1454: Contested Issues — Panel messages said older assets can create tourism draw and be maintained by community groups. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1457: Contested Issues — Panel messages asked Council to investigate a separate asset fund funded by a rates surcharge. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1460: Contested Issues — Panel messages asked for transparency about assets that cost the most and generate least. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1463: Contested Issues — Panel messages said leisure services may not be big earners but are vital for health and connection. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1466: Contested Issues — Panel messages called for consultation before Council removes or alters assets. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1469: Contested Issues — Panel messages repeatedly prioritised roads. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1472: Contested Issues — Panel messages called for a link bus between townships for business, youth, older residents and tourism. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1475: Contested Issues — Panel messages called for more recreation, leisure and community activities. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1478: Contested Issues — Panel messages called for support for local business, tourism, activities and events. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1481: Contested Issues — Panel messages called for clear, honest and timely Council information. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1484: Contested Issues — Panel messages said consultation is good but there is little evidence Council takes notice. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1487: Contested Issues — Panel messages called for engagement with Aboriginal community members living in the Shire. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1490: Contested Issues — A submission raised health concerns from dust if the Wallan quarry proceeds. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1493: Contested Issues — A submission referred to Wallan Quarry and 20 workers if it proceeds. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1496: Contested Issues — Submissions raised water, infrastructure and power for high-growth, high-density areas. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1499: Contested Issues — A submission said retaining country feel is impossible with growth. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: msc-2025-deliberative-engagement-report-final-240425-1.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1502: Delivery — Park land should transfer through an Infrastructure Contribution Plan or as encumbered open space where possible. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1505: Delivery — The ICP system is specific about what land can be public-purpose land. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1508: Delivery — A large portion of the regional park will be environmentally encumbered land. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1511: Delivery — Park land transfer under PSP/ICP would likely be gradual as land is subdivided across precincts. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1514: Delivery — Batches of large continuous land transfers would avoid connectivity and access issues for land managers. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1517: Delivery — Land not transferable under PSP/ICP should be reserved with a Public Acquisition Overlay. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1520: Delivery — A Public Acquisition Overlay would protect land from inappropriate use and development and avoid value uplift. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1523: Delivery — GAIC works-in-kind should be explored for transfer of land from developers to the State. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1526: Delivery — GAIC works-in-kind will not fund works outside the Urban Growth Boundary. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1529: Delivery — Land identified for the park should be zoned through the PSP process and transferred under ICPs where possible. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1532: Delivery — Any land Victorian Government must purchase should be purchased as soon as practicable to avoid value uplift. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1535: Delivery — Quarry sites require rehabilitation before incorporation into the park. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1538: Delivery — Quarry rehabilitation plans must consult Wurundjeri Woi-wurrung people. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1541: Delivery — Most future park land will be managed by Parks Victoria and WWCHAC. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 1.1544: Delivery — Waterways with Growling Grass Frog habitat will likely be managed by Melbourne Water. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
  • Ledger 2.1547: Spatial Frame — Wallan is located in the south of Mitchell Shire. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Mechanism: This ledger item affects at least one of growth capacity, land constraint, staging, infrastructure cost, service equity, environmental risk, social licence, transport pressure or asset renewal. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)
    • Feasibility implication: The Wallan Structure Plan should make this item operational through a mapped control, trigger, contribution, advocacy project, design standard, delivery sequence or stated gap. (Source: 3323-ms-visitor-guides-wallan-and-surrounds-web.txt)