Wallan East Part 1 Precinct Structure Plan

Executive Thesis

Wallan East Part 1 is a high-dependency draft PSP rather than a settled development program because the local corpus contains the regional-park feasibility assessment but not the raw Wallan East Part 1 PSP, land budget, infrastructure schedule, amendment package, ICP, panel report, or submissions register. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: local workspace search) The strongest direct source says Wallan East Part 1 was in draft PSP preparation, was identified on the Victorian Planning Authority Fast-track Program, and had co-design workshops with landowners and agencies in late 2020. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt) The same source says the Wallan East Part 1 PSP area includes the Wallan Station area and the Merri Creek corridor, making the precinct simultaneously a housing, transport, open-space, biodiversity, drainage, and land-value-capture problem. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt) The current draft plan identified Merri Creek as an opportunity for an open-space corridor, but the place-based plan used for co-design made no reference to the wallan wallan Regional Park and did not set aside open-space land beyond waterway and drainage corridors. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt) That omission is material because the report says PSPs in preparation, including Wallan East Part 1, still had an opportunity to designate land for the future regional park and require transfer under an Infrastructure Contributions Plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt) If Wallan East Part 1 fixes lot yield before fixing Merri Creek corridor width, station access, WRP land, waterway buffers, flood function, cultural values, open-space hierarchy, and asset handover obligations, the precinct converts solvable early-stage planning choices into later acquisition, compensation, maintenance, and feasibility disputes. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt) Wallan is forecast to grow from 18,758 people in 2025 to 49,123 people in 2045, a 161.9 percent increase and an additional 30,365 residents. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt) Mitchell Shire is forecast to grow from 64,175 people in 2025 to 209,508 people in 2045, a 226.5 percent increase and an additional 145,333 residents. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt) The Council Plan uses a 2046 horizon and records Wallan at 18,758 people in 2025, 29,601 in 2036, and 51,539 in 2046. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt) The future wallan wallan Regional Park is expected to serve a 15 kilometre catchment with at least 230,000 people in 2021 and approximately 430,000 people by 2036. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt) The feasibility question is therefore sequencing: whether a fast-track PSP can reserve public-purpose land, protect corridor functions, and stage infrastructure before residential value uplift makes public outcomes more expensive. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Source Base And Limits

Primary direct source: Feasibility for wallan wallan Regional Park - Report 2022. It names Wallan East Part 1, gives status, identifies Wallan Station and Merri Creek, and states the co-design/place-based-plan issue. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt) Primary indirect source: Asset Plan 2025-2035. It quantifies Wallan, Beveridge, and whole-shire growth and explains lifecycle asset liability. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt) Primary indirect source: Council Plan and Health and Wellbeing Plan 2025-2029. It quantifies 2025, 2036, and 2046 population forecasts and Council actions for open space, housing, community infrastructure, roads, public transport, active transport, and growth-area delivery. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt) Primary indirect source: Mitchell Sports Field Feasibility Study. It sets sports reserve hierarchy, Wallan population trigger logic, and developer-contribution benchmarks from other PSPs. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt) Primary indirect source: Urban Forest Strategy 2023. It quantifies canopy targets and identifies PSPs as a mechanism for protecting significant vegetation and delivering 30 percent public-realm canopy. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt) Primary indirect source: Community Vision April 2025. It quantifies population growth, weekly housing growth, consultation response numbers, and community transport/open-space concerns. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt) Primary indirect source: Parks and Open Space Asset Management Plan. It quantifies open-space asset value, funding shortfall, and future-demand pressure in Wallan and Beveridge as Melbourne Urban Growth Area townships. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt) The requested schema file was not present at C:\pi\schema\CLAUDE.md or elsewhere found under C:\pi during local workspace search, so this page follows the worked-example pattern visible in existing Mitchell wiki pages. (Source: local workspace search) The target page did not exist before this rewrite, so this is a new synthesis rather than an expansion of prior local analysis. (Source: local workspace search) No direct raw Wallan East Part 1 PSP, ICP, amendment controls, panel report, submission table, land budget, road plan, drainage strategy, open-space schedule, school-site schedule, or station-access plan was available in the local extracted Mitchell corpus. (Source: local workspace search)

Hard Facts Extracted From The Corpus

Fact: Wallan East Part 1 was listed as a precinct currently undergoing Precinct Structure Planning. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Fact: Wallan East Part 1 had the status of draft PSP preparation. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Fact: Wallan East Part 1 was identified on the VPA Fast-track Program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Fact: Co-design workshops for Wallan East Part 1 were conducted in late 2020 with landowners and agencies. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Fact: The Wallan East Part 1 PSP area includes the Wallan Station area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Fact: The Wallan East Part 1 PSP area includes the Merri Creek corridor. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Fact: The current draft plan identified Merri Creek as an opportunity for an open-space corridor. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Fact: The place-based plan used for co-design made no reference to the wallan wallan Regional Park. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Fact: The place-based plan used for co-design did not set aside open-space land beyond waterway and drainage corridors. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Fact: PSPs include land or funds for public infrastructure under an ICP for each PSP area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Fact: Once a PSP is complete, it is implemented through a Planning Scheme Amendment with planning controls applied according to the PSP and ICP. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Fact: PSPs in preparation, including Wallan East Part 1, offered limited consideration of the potential future WRP and did not indicate land would be set aside for it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Fact: An urgent review of draft PSPs and concept plans was recommended to ensure land is designated as public open space for the WRP. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Fact: If PSPs progress without WRP land designation, any land identified for acquisition would require purchase. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Fact: Land in the future WRP would best be zoned Public Conservation and Resource Zone or Public Park and Recreation Zone. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Fact: WRP rezoning should occur through Planning Scheme Amendments implementing PSPs. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Fact: The WRP catchment is anticipated to be 15 kilometres from park boundaries. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Fact: The WRP catchment population was at least 230,000 in 2021 and approximately 430,000 by 2036. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Fact: From 2016 to 2021, the WRP catchment annual population growth rate increased by 14,340 persons, or 7.7 percent per annum. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Fact: Across the 15 years projected to 2036, the WRP catchment population is projected to increase by approximately 198,650 persons. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Fact: Regional parks in urban growth corridors are planned on a standard of at least 40 hectares of passive open space for every 150,000 people. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Fact: New regional parks generally take 10 to 15 years to establish. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Fact: Land for the WRP should be acquired through an ICP or as encumbered open space where possible to minimise purchase costs. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Fact: Transfer of WRP land under PSP/ICP would likely occur gradually as land is subdivided across precincts. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Fact: For land not able to be transferred under PSP/ICP, a Public Acquisition Overlay should be applied. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Fact: A PAO would reserve land for purchase, protect it from inappropriate use and development, and help avoid further value uplift. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Fact: WRP waterways with Growling Grass Frog habitat, including Merri Creek and wetlands, would likely be managed by Melbourne Water. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Fact: Wallan is forecast to grow from 18,758 people in 2025 to 49,123 people in 2045, a 161.9 percent increase. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Fact: Beveridge is forecast to grow from 9,082 people in 2025 to 104,066 people in 2045, a 1,045.9 percent increase. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Fact: Mitchell Shire is forecast to grow from 64,175 people in 2025 to 209,508 people in 2045, a 226.5 percent increase. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Fact: Replacing the major assets covered by the Asset Plan in 2025 would cost around $1.23 billion. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Fact: About 79 percent, or $573 million, of the 10-year capital budget is allocated to growth through new assets and expansion. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Fact: About 21 percent, or $155 million, of the 10-year capital budget is allocated to preservation of existing assets. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Fact: Developers cover the majority of upfront costs for new growth, but Council is responsible for ongoing maintenance and service delivery over the life of the asset. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Fact: Developer contributions and ICPs fund infrastructure needed because of new development. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Fact: Flood-prone areas increase the time, effort, and cost of maintaining roads, drainage, and community facilities. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Fact: The Council Plan forecasts Wallan at 18,758 people in 2025, 29,601 in 2036, and 51,539 in 2046. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Fact: The Council Plan forecasts Mitchell Shire at 64,175 people in 2025, 123,801 in 2036, and 221,638 in 2046. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Fact: The Council Plan says most growth is happening in the southern corridor of Beveridge, Wallan, and Kilmore. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Fact: The Council Plan names Wallan East Family and Children’s Community Centre as an interim-name facility. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Fact: Council Plan action 3.1.2 is to advocate for establishment of Wallan Wallan Regional Parklands. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Fact: Council Plan action 3.5.5 is to increase bicycle and active transport infrastructure. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Fact: Council Plan action 3.5.6 is to plan and deliver local road transport infrastructure for growing communities. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Fact: The Sports Field Feasibility Study recommends three new active sporting reserves in Wallan when population reaches 35,000, expected in 2036. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Fact: Local sporting reserves generally serve 3,000 to 5,000 people and are around 8 hectares. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Fact: District sporting reserves generally serve 10,000 to 15,000 people and are around 10 hectares. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Fact: Regional sporting reserves serve about 100,000 people within a 60 minute drive and are at least 20 hectares. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Fact: Lockerbie PSP public open-space contribution was 8.33 percent of net developable area: 6.30 percent active and 2.03 percent passive. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Fact: Lockerbie North PSP public open-space contribution was 9.15 percent of net developable area: 5.9 percent active and 3.24 percent passive. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Fact: The Urban Forest Strategy targets 20 percent average township canopy by 2043 and 30 percent by 2073. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Fact: The Urban Forest Strategy requires new development estates to achieve a minimum 30 percent tree canopy over public land under VPA guidelines. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Fact: The Urban Forest Strategy says one canopy tree should ideally be planted for every 5 car spaces. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Fact: The Community Vision says 28 new homes were built every week, increasing need for local schools, sports facilities, and community infrastructure. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)
Fact: The Community Vision consultation in 2020-2021 received 1,521 survey responses and 822 responses from in-person activities. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)
Fact: The Parks and Open Space AMP says Wallan and Beveridge fall within the Melbourne Urban Growth Area. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Fact: The Parks and Open Space AMP says the parks and open-space asset portfolio had an estimated fair value replacement cost of $30.58 million as at 30 June 2021. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Fact: The Parks and Open Space AMP says projected parks and open-space expenditure over 10 years was $123.4 million, or$ 12.3 million per year. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Fact: The Parks and Open Space AMP says estimated available funding over 10 years was $107.2 million, or$ 10.7 million per year, equal to 87 percent of the cost to sustain current service at lowest lifecycle cost. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Fact: The Parks and Open Space AMP says projected operations, maintenance, and capital renewal expenditure required over 10 years was $8.98 million per year. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Fact: The Parks and Open Space AMP says estimated operations, maintenance, and capital renewal funding was $6.88 million per year, creating a$ 2.1 million annual shortfall and providing 77 percent of required expenditure. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Fact: The Parks and Open Space AMP says the projected asset renewal funding ratio was 44 percent over 10 years. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)

Mechanism Analysis

Draft PSP status - pass 1

Evidence: Draft PSP status is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Because Wallan East Part 1 was still in draft PSP preparation, its developability depends on unresolved statutory translation: place-based planning must become PSP maps, an ICP, amendment controls, public-purpose land schedules, and permit-ready staging. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Development feasibility remains conditional until the raw PSP and ICP show what land is developable, encumbered, transferred, acquired, or staged. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Fast-track program - pass 1

Evidence: Fast-track program is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Fast-track status increases timing pressure because unresolved open-space, station, waterway, drainage, and cultural questions can be carried into exhibition if not solved before the draft hardens. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Fast-track feasibility is strong only if acceleration reduces process delay without removing the evidence needed to price land and infrastructure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Late-2020 co-design - pass 1

Evidence: Late-2020 co-design is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Co-design with landowners and agencies is a mechanism for surfacing site constraints before exhibition, but the value depends on whether workshop outputs are reflected in the statutory plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Feasibility risk remains if landowners price lots from workshop concepts while agencies expect later corridor widening or public-purpose reservations. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Wallan Station area - pass 1

Evidence: Wallan Station area is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Station-area inclusion means the PSP must align housing density, walking catchments, bus interchange, parking, local streets, cycling links, and grade-safe access. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Development yield near the station is more valuable, but also more exposed to access, parking, and public-transport staging disputes. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Merri Creek corridor - pass 1

Evidence: Merri Creek corridor is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Merri Creek is not just amenity open space; it is drainage, flood, biodiversity, cultural landscape, trail, and potential regional-park infrastructure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Lots that rely on narrowing the corridor or counting encumbered drainage land as full open-space provision carry higher approval and long-term-management risk. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

No WRP reference in co-design plan - pass 1

Evidence: No WRP reference in co-design plan is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: A place-based plan that omits the WRP can produce a local open-space network that fails corridor-scale park acquisition and connectivity tests. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: The feasibility implication is future rework: land already assumed for urban yield may need purchase, PAO reservation, or redesign. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Open space limited to waterways and drainage - pass 1

Evidence: Open space limited to waterways and drainage is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Waterway and drainage corridors are necessary but not always sufficient for regional park, active open space, passive recreation, cultural interpretation, or district trails. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Developers may receive lower certainty if additional unencumbered public open space is later required beyond the draft drainage network. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

ICP land transfer - pass 1

Evidence: ICP land transfer is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: ICP transfer converts land-value uplift into public infrastructure at subdivision rather than requiring later acquisition at a higher value. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Feasibility improves where public-purpose land is known before acquisition costs, lot yields, and contribution liabilities are priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

PAO fallback - pass 1

Evidence: PAO fallback is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: A PAO protects land for future purchase but also signals that the PSP/ICP process failed to secure no-cost or lower-cost transfer. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: PAO reliance can reduce landowner certainty and increase government funding exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Gradual subdivision transfer - pass 1

Evidence: Gradual subdivision transfer is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Subdivision-led land transfer staggers public ownership over years and can leave isolated fragments before continuous park management is possible. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Feasibility depends on staging large enough contiguous batches to avoid unusable public land and access gaps. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Value uplift - pass 1

Evidence: Value uplift is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Gazettal of a PSP typically increases certainty about development potential and can increase land value. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Any WRP or open-space land not identified before gazettal may become more expensive to acquire. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Population shock - pass 1

Evidence: Population shock is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Mechanism: Wallan adds 30,365 people between 2025 and 2045 in the Asset Plan forecast. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Development feasibility implication: This scale converts local streets, schools, parks, drainage, and community facilities from township upgrades into growth-area infrastructure dependencies. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)

Whole-shire growth - pass 1

Evidence: Whole-shire growth is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Mechanism: Mitchell adds 145,333 people between 2025 and 2045 in the Asset Plan forecast. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Council must absorb growth assets while still renewing existing assets, so handover quality and lifecycle cost matter to feasibility. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)

Capital budget allocation - pass 1

Evidence: Capital budget allocation is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Mechanism: A 79 percent growth allocation in the 10-year capital budget shows that new and expanded assets dominate Council investment. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Development feasibility implication: A precinct that adds fragmented or high-maintenance assets worsens the renewal problem even if upfront construction is developer-funded. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)

Renewal squeeze - pass 1

Evidence: Renewal squeeze is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Mechanism: Only 21 percent of the 10-year capital budget is allocated to preservation of existing assets. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Wallan East Part 1 should avoid asset forms that are cheap to deliver but expensive to maintain, renew, inspect, or retrofit. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)

Developer contribution gap - pass 1

Evidence: Developer contribution gap is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Mechanism: Developer contributions reduce the growth burden but Council can be tasked with making up differences. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Infrastructure staging should not assume contribution revenue arrives before dwellings create service demand. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)

Flood-prone maintenance - pass 1

Evidence: Flood-prone maintenance is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Mechanism: Flood-prone areas increase the time, effort, and cost of maintaining roads, drainage, and community facilities. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Road and drainage alignments near Merri Creek should be tested for lifecycle exposure, not only initial engineering compliance. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)

Council Plan 2046 forecast - pass 1

Evidence: Council Plan 2046 forecast is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Mechanism: The Council Plan projects Wallan to 51,539 people in 2046. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Development feasibility implication: The 2046 figure confirms that Wallan East Part 1 infrastructure should be assessed beyond the first subdivision stages. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)

Wallan East community centre - pass 1

Evidence: Wallan East community centre is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Mechanism: The Council Plan identifies Wallan East Family and Children’s Community Centre as an interim-name facility. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Development feasibility implication: The PSP must coordinate family-services land, timing, catchment access, and interim service delivery with housing stages. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)

Active open-space threshold - pass 1

Evidence: Active open-space threshold is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Mechanism: Wallan needs three new active reserves at the 35,000 population trigger expected in 2036 in the sports study. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Wallan East Part 1 should show whether it contributes usable district reserve land or relies on other precincts. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)

Sports hierarchy - pass 1

Evidence: Sports hierarchy is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Mechanism: Local reserves at 8 hectares, district reserves at 10 hectares, and regional reserves at 20 hectares plus serve different catchments. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Counting small, encumbered, or poorly shaped parcels as sports provision can overstate feasibility. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)

Canopy target - pass 1

Evidence: Canopy target is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Mechanism: New estates should achieve 30 percent tree canopy over public land under VPA guidelines. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Street sections, utilities, crossovers, car parks, and drainage reserves must be designed before subdivision to make canopy physically possible. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

Car-park shade - pass 1

Evidence: Car-park shade is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Mechanism: One canopy tree per 5 car spaces is the Urban Forest Strategy ideal. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Station-area parking and activity-centre parking should reserve soil volume and tree pits at PSP/design stage, not after asphalt layouts are fixed. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

Community growth rate - pass 1

Evidence: Community growth rate is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)
Mechanism: Community Vision says 28 new homes per week were being built and population was increasing by 87 people per week. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Growth speed makes lagged infrastructure visible quickly: schools, sports, roads, parks, and community services need front-loaded delivery. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)

Open-space funding shortfall - pass 1

Evidence: Open-space funding shortfall is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Mechanism: The Parks and Open Space AMP funds 87 percent of projected parks/open-space service cost and only 77 percent of operations, maintenance, and renewal need. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Wallan East Part 1 should minimise maintenance-heavy public-realm designs unless a recurrent funding source is clear. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)

Draft PSP status - pass 2

Evidence: Draft PSP status is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Because Wallan East Part 1 was still in draft PSP preparation, its developability depends on unresolved statutory translation: place-based planning must become PSP maps, an ICP, amendment controls, public-purpose land schedules, and permit-ready staging. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Development feasibility remains conditional until the raw PSP and ICP show what land is developable, encumbered, transferred, acquired, or staged. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Fast-track program - pass 2

Evidence: Fast-track program is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Fast-track status increases timing pressure because unresolved open-space, station, waterway, drainage, and cultural questions can be carried into exhibition if not solved before the draft hardens. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Fast-track feasibility is strong only if acceleration reduces process delay without removing the evidence needed to price land and infrastructure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Late-2020 co-design - pass 2

Evidence: Late-2020 co-design is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Co-design with landowners and agencies is a mechanism for surfacing site constraints before exhibition, but the value depends on whether workshop outputs are reflected in the statutory plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Feasibility risk remains if landowners price lots from workshop concepts while agencies expect later corridor widening or public-purpose reservations. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Wallan Station area - pass 2

Evidence: Wallan Station area is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Station-area inclusion means the PSP must align housing density, walking catchments, bus interchange, parking, local streets, cycling links, and grade-safe access. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Development yield near the station is more valuable, but also more exposed to access, parking, and public-transport staging disputes. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Merri Creek corridor - pass 2

Evidence: Merri Creek corridor is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Merri Creek is not just amenity open space; it is drainage, flood, biodiversity, cultural landscape, trail, and potential regional-park infrastructure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Lots that rely on narrowing the corridor or counting encumbered drainage land as full open-space provision carry higher approval and long-term-management risk. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

No WRP reference in co-design plan - pass 2

Evidence: No WRP reference in co-design plan is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: A place-based plan that omits the WRP can produce a local open-space network that fails corridor-scale park acquisition and connectivity tests. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: The feasibility implication is future rework: land already assumed for urban yield may need purchase, PAO reservation, or redesign. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Open space limited to waterways and drainage - pass 2

Evidence: Open space limited to waterways and drainage is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Waterway and drainage corridors are necessary but not always sufficient for regional park, active open space, passive recreation, cultural interpretation, or district trails. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Developers may receive lower certainty if additional unencumbered public open space is later required beyond the draft drainage network. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

ICP land transfer - pass 2

Evidence: ICP land transfer is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: ICP transfer converts land-value uplift into public infrastructure at subdivision rather than requiring later acquisition at a higher value. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Feasibility improves where public-purpose land is known before acquisition costs, lot yields, and contribution liabilities are priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

PAO fallback - pass 2

Evidence: PAO fallback is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: A PAO protects land for future purchase but also signals that the PSP/ICP process failed to secure no-cost or lower-cost transfer. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: PAO reliance can reduce landowner certainty and increase government funding exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Gradual subdivision transfer - pass 2

Evidence: Gradual subdivision transfer is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Subdivision-led land transfer staggers public ownership over years and can leave isolated fragments before continuous park management is possible. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Feasibility depends on staging large enough contiguous batches to avoid unusable public land and access gaps. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Value uplift - pass 2

Evidence: Value uplift is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Gazettal of a PSP typically increases certainty about development potential and can increase land value. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Any WRP or open-space land not identified before gazettal may become more expensive to acquire. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Population shock - pass 2

Evidence: Population shock is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Mechanism: Wallan adds 30,365 people between 2025 and 2045 in the Asset Plan forecast. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Development feasibility implication: This scale converts local streets, schools, parks, drainage, and community facilities from township upgrades into growth-area infrastructure dependencies. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)

Whole-shire growth - pass 2

Evidence: Whole-shire growth is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Mechanism: Mitchell adds 145,333 people between 2025 and 2045 in the Asset Plan forecast. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Council must absorb growth assets while still renewing existing assets, so handover quality and lifecycle cost matter to feasibility. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)

Capital budget allocation - pass 2

Evidence: Capital budget allocation is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Mechanism: A 79 percent growth allocation in the 10-year capital budget shows that new and expanded assets dominate Council investment. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Development feasibility implication: A precinct that adds fragmented or high-maintenance assets worsens the renewal problem even if upfront construction is developer-funded. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)

Renewal squeeze - pass 2

Evidence: Renewal squeeze is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Mechanism: Only 21 percent of the 10-year capital budget is allocated to preservation of existing assets. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Wallan East Part 1 should avoid asset forms that are cheap to deliver but expensive to maintain, renew, inspect, or retrofit. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)

Developer contribution gap - pass 2

Evidence: Developer contribution gap is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Mechanism: Developer contributions reduce the growth burden but Council can be tasked with making up differences. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Infrastructure staging should not assume contribution revenue arrives before dwellings create service demand. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)

Flood-prone maintenance - pass 2

Evidence: Flood-prone maintenance is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Mechanism: Flood-prone areas increase the time, effort, and cost of maintaining roads, drainage, and community facilities. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Road and drainage alignments near Merri Creek should be tested for lifecycle exposure, not only initial engineering compliance. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)

Council Plan 2046 forecast - pass 2

Evidence: Council Plan 2046 forecast is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Mechanism: The Council Plan projects Wallan to 51,539 people in 2046. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Development feasibility implication: The 2046 figure confirms that Wallan East Part 1 infrastructure should be assessed beyond the first subdivision stages. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)

Wallan East community centre - pass 2

Evidence: Wallan East community centre is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Mechanism: The Council Plan identifies Wallan East Family and Children’s Community Centre as an interim-name facility. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Development feasibility implication: The PSP must coordinate family-services land, timing, catchment access, and interim service delivery with housing stages. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)

Active open-space threshold - pass 2

Evidence: Active open-space threshold is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Mechanism: Wallan needs three new active reserves at the 35,000 population trigger expected in 2036 in the sports study. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Wallan East Part 1 should show whether it contributes usable district reserve land or relies on other precincts. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)

Sports hierarchy - pass 2

Evidence: Sports hierarchy is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Mechanism: Local reserves at 8 hectares, district reserves at 10 hectares, and regional reserves at 20 hectares plus serve different catchments. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Counting small, encumbered, or poorly shaped parcels as sports provision can overstate feasibility. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)

Canopy target - pass 2

Evidence: Canopy target is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Mechanism: New estates should achieve 30 percent tree canopy over public land under VPA guidelines. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Street sections, utilities, crossovers, car parks, and drainage reserves must be designed before subdivision to make canopy physically possible. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

Car-park shade - pass 2

Evidence: Car-park shade is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Mechanism: One canopy tree per 5 car spaces is the Urban Forest Strategy ideal. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Station-area parking and activity-centre parking should reserve soil volume and tree pits at PSP/design stage, not after asphalt layouts are fixed. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

Community growth rate - pass 2

Evidence: Community growth rate is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)
Mechanism: Community Vision says 28 new homes per week were being built and population was increasing by 87 people per week. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Growth speed makes lagged infrastructure visible quickly: schools, sports, roads, parks, and community services need front-loaded delivery. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)

Open-space funding shortfall - pass 2

Evidence: Open-space funding shortfall is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Mechanism: The Parks and Open Space AMP funds 87 percent of projected parks/open-space service cost and only 77 percent of operations, maintenance, and renewal need. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Wallan East Part 1 should minimise maintenance-heavy public-realm designs unless a recurrent funding source is clear. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)

Draft PSP status - pass 3

Evidence: Draft PSP status is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Because Wallan East Part 1 was still in draft PSP preparation, its developability depends on unresolved statutory translation: place-based planning must become PSP maps, an ICP, amendment controls, public-purpose land schedules, and permit-ready staging. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Development feasibility remains conditional until the raw PSP and ICP show what land is developable, encumbered, transferred, acquired, or staged. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Fast-track program - pass 3

Evidence: Fast-track program is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Fast-track status increases timing pressure because unresolved open-space, station, waterway, drainage, and cultural questions can be carried into exhibition if not solved before the draft hardens. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Fast-track feasibility is strong only if acceleration reduces process delay without removing the evidence needed to price land and infrastructure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Late-2020 co-design - pass 3

Evidence: Late-2020 co-design is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Co-design with landowners and agencies is a mechanism for surfacing site constraints before exhibition, but the value depends on whether workshop outputs are reflected in the statutory plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Feasibility risk remains if landowners price lots from workshop concepts while agencies expect later corridor widening or public-purpose reservations. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Wallan Station area - pass 3

Evidence: Wallan Station area is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Station-area inclusion means the PSP must align housing density, walking catchments, bus interchange, parking, local streets, cycling links, and grade-safe access. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Development yield near the station is more valuable, but also more exposed to access, parking, and public-transport staging disputes. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Merri Creek corridor - pass 3

Evidence: Merri Creek corridor is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Merri Creek is not just amenity open space; it is drainage, flood, biodiversity, cultural landscape, trail, and potential regional-park infrastructure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Lots that rely on narrowing the corridor or counting encumbered drainage land as full open-space provision carry higher approval and long-term-management risk. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

No WRP reference in co-design plan - pass 3

Evidence: No WRP reference in co-design plan is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: A place-based plan that omits the WRP can produce a local open-space network that fails corridor-scale park acquisition and connectivity tests. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: The feasibility implication is future rework: land already assumed for urban yield may need purchase, PAO reservation, or redesign. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Open space limited to waterways and drainage - pass 3

Evidence: Open space limited to waterways and drainage is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Waterway and drainage corridors are necessary but not always sufficient for regional park, active open space, passive recreation, cultural interpretation, or district trails. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Developers may receive lower certainty if additional unencumbered public open space is later required beyond the draft drainage network. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

ICP land transfer - pass 3

Evidence: ICP land transfer is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: ICP transfer converts land-value uplift into public infrastructure at subdivision rather than requiring later acquisition at a higher value. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Feasibility improves where public-purpose land is known before acquisition costs, lot yields, and contribution liabilities are priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

PAO fallback - pass 3

Evidence: PAO fallback is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: A PAO protects land for future purchase but also signals that the PSP/ICP process failed to secure no-cost or lower-cost transfer. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: PAO reliance can reduce landowner certainty and increase government funding exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Gradual subdivision transfer - pass 3

Evidence: Gradual subdivision transfer is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Subdivision-led land transfer staggers public ownership over years and can leave isolated fragments before continuous park management is possible. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Feasibility depends on staging large enough contiguous batches to avoid unusable public land and access gaps. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Value uplift - pass 3

Evidence: Value uplift is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Gazettal of a PSP typically increases certainty about development potential and can increase land value. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Any WRP or open-space land not identified before gazettal may become more expensive to acquire. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Population shock - pass 3

Evidence: Population shock is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Mechanism: Wallan adds 30,365 people between 2025 and 2045 in the Asset Plan forecast. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Development feasibility implication: This scale converts local streets, schools, parks, drainage, and community facilities from township upgrades into growth-area infrastructure dependencies. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)

Whole-shire growth - pass 3

Evidence: Whole-shire growth is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Mechanism: Mitchell adds 145,333 people between 2025 and 2045 in the Asset Plan forecast. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Council must absorb growth assets while still renewing existing assets, so handover quality and lifecycle cost matter to feasibility. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)

Capital budget allocation - pass 3

Evidence: Capital budget allocation is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Mechanism: A 79 percent growth allocation in the 10-year capital budget shows that new and expanded assets dominate Council investment. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Development feasibility implication: A precinct that adds fragmented or high-maintenance assets worsens the renewal problem even if upfront construction is developer-funded. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)

Renewal squeeze - pass 3

Evidence: Renewal squeeze is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Mechanism: Only 21 percent of the 10-year capital budget is allocated to preservation of existing assets. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Wallan East Part 1 should avoid asset forms that are cheap to deliver but expensive to maintain, renew, inspect, or retrofit. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)

Developer contribution gap - pass 3

Evidence: Developer contribution gap is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Mechanism: Developer contributions reduce the growth burden but Council can be tasked with making up differences. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Infrastructure staging should not assume contribution revenue arrives before dwellings create service demand. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)

Flood-prone maintenance - pass 3

Evidence: Flood-prone maintenance is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Mechanism: Flood-prone areas increase the time, effort, and cost of maintaining roads, drainage, and community facilities. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Road and drainage alignments near Merri Creek should be tested for lifecycle exposure, not only initial engineering compliance. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)

Council Plan 2046 forecast - pass 3

Evidence: Council Plan 2046 forecast is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Mechanism: The Council Plan projects Wallan to 51,539 people in 2046. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Development feasibility implication: The 2046 figure confirms that Wallan East Part 1 infrastructure should be assessed beyond the first subdivision stages. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)

Wallan East community centre - pass 3

Evidence: Wallan East community centre is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Mechanism: The Council Plan identifies Wallan East Family and Children’s Community Centre as an interim-name facility. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Development feasibility implication: The PSP must coordinate family-services land, timing, catchment access, and interim service delivery with housing stages. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)

Active open-space threshold - pass 3

Evidence: Active open-space threshold is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Mechanism: Wallan needs three new active reserves at the 35,000 population trigger expected in 2036 in the sports study. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Wallan East Part 1 should show whether it contributes usable district reserve land or relies on other precincts. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)

Sports hierarchy - pass 3

Evidence: Sports hierarchy is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Mechanism: Local reserves at 8 hectares, district reserves at 10 hectares, and regional reserves at 20 hectares plus serve different catchments. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Counting small, encumbered, or poorly shaped parcels as sports provision can overstate feasibility. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)

Canopy target - pass 3

Evidence: Canopy target is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Mechanism: New estates should achieve 30 percent tree canopy over public land under VPA guidelines. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Street sections, utilities, crossovers, car parks, and drainage reserves must be designed before subdivision to make canopy physically possible. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

Car-park shade - pass 3

Evidence: Car-park shade is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Mechanism: One canopy tree per 5 car spaces is the Urban Forest Strategy ideal. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Station-area parking and activity-centre parking should reserve soil volume and tree pits at PSP/design stage, not after asphalt layouts are fixed. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

Community growth rate - pass 3

Evidence: Community growth rate is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)
Mechanism: Community Vision says 28 new homes per week were being built and population was increasing by 87 people per week. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Growth speed makes lagged infrastructure visible quickly: schools, sports, roads, parks, and community services need front-loaded delivery. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)

Open-space funding shortfall - pass 3

Evidence: Open-space funding shortfall is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Mechanism: The Parks and Open Space AMP funds 87 percent of projected parks/open-space service cost and only 77 percent of operations, maintenance, and renewal need. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Wallan East Part 1 should minimise maintenance-heavy public-realm designs unless a recurrent funding source is clear. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)

Draft PSP status - pass 4

Evidence: Draft PSP status is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Because Wallan East Part 1 was still in draft PSP preparation, its developability depends on unresolved statutory translation: place-based planning must become PSP maps, an ICP, amendment controls, public-purpose land schedules, and permit-ready staging. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Development feasibility remains conditional until the raw PSP and ICP show what land is developable, encumbered, transferred, acquired, or staged. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Fast-track program - pass 4

Evidence: Fast-track program is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Fast-track status increases timing pressure because unresolved open-space, station, waterway, drainage, and cultural questions can be carried into exhibition if not solved before the draft hardens. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Fast-track feasibility is strong only if acceleration reduces process delay without removing the evidence needed to price land and infrastructure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Late-2020 co-design - pass 4

Evidence: Late-2020 co-design is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Co-design with landowners and agencies is a mechanism for surfacing site constraints before exhibition, but the value depends on whether workshop outputs are reflected in the statutory plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Feasibility risk remains if landowners price lots from workshop concepts while agencies expect later corridor widening or public-purpose reservations. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Wallan Station area - pass 4

Evidence: Wallan Station area is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Station-area inclusion means the PSP must align housing density, walking catchments, bus interchange, parking, local streets, cycling links, and grade-safe access. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Development yield near the station is more valuable, but also more exposed to access, parking, and public-transport staging disputes. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Merri Creek corridor - pass 4

Evidence: Merri Creek corridor is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Merri Creek is not just amenity open space; it is drainage, flood, biodiversity, cultural landscape, trail, and potential regional-park infrastructure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Lots that rely on narrowing the corridor or counting encumbered drainage land as full open-space provision carry higher approval and long-term-management risk. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

No WRP reference in co-design plan - pass 4

Evidence: No WRP reference in co-design plan is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: A place-based plan that omits the WRP can produce a local open-space network that fails corridor-scale park acquisition and connectivity tests. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: The feasibility implication is future rework: land already assumed for urban yield may need purchase, PAO reservation, or redesign. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Open space limited to waterways and drainage - pass 4

Evidence: Open space limited to waterways and drainage is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Waterway and drainage corridors are necessary but not always sufficient for regional park, active open space, passive recreation, cultural interpretation, or district trails. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Developers may receive lower certainty if additional unencumbered public open space is later required beyond the draft drainage network. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

ICP land transfer - pass 4

Evidence: ICP land transfer is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: ICP transfer converts land-value uplift into public infrastructure at subdivision rather than requiring later acquisition at a higher value. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Feasibility improves where public-purpose land is known before acquisition costs, lot yields, and contribution liabilities are priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

PAO fallback - pass 4

Evidence: PAO fallback is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: A PAO protects land for future purchase but also signals that the PSP/ICP process failed to secure no-cost or lower-cost transfer. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: PAO reliance can reduce landowner certainty and increase government funding exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Gradual subdivision transfer - pass 4

Evidence: Gradual subdivision transfer is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Subdivision-led land transfer staggers public ownership over years and can leave isolated fragments before continuous park management is possible. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Feasibility depends on staging large enough contiguous batches to avoid unusable public land and access gaps. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Value uplift - pass 4

Evidence: Value uplift is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Gazettal of a PSP typically increases certainty about development potential and can increase land value. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Any WRP or open-space land not identified before gazettal may become more expensive to acquire. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Population shock - pass 4

Evidence: Population shock is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Mechanism: Wallan adds 30,365 people between 2025 and 2045 in the Asset Plan forecast. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Development feasibility implication: This scale converts local streets, schools, parks, drainage, and community facilities from township upgrades into growth-area infrastructure dependencies. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)

Whole-shire growth - pass 4

Evidence: Whole-shire growth is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Mechanism: Mitchell adds 145,333 people between 2025 and 2045 in the Asset Plan forecast. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Council must absorb growth assets while still renewing existing assets, so handover quality and lifecycle cost matter to feasibility. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)

Capital budget allocation - pass 4

Evidence: Capital budget allocation is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Mechanism: A 79 percent growth allocation in the 10-year capital budget shows that new and expanded assets dominate Council investment. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Development feasibility implication: A precinct that adds fragmented or high-maintenance assets worsens the renewal problem even if upfront construction is developer-funded. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)

Renewal squeeze - pass 4

Evidence: Renewal squeeze is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Mechanism: Only 21 percent of the 10-year capital budget is allocated to preservation of existing assets. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Wallan East Part 1 should avoid asset forms that are cheap to deliver but expensive to maintain, renew, inspect, or retrofit. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)

Developer contribution gap - pass 4

Evidence: Developer contribution gap is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Mechanism: Developer contributions reduce the growth burden but Council can be tasked with making up differences. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Infrastructure staging should not assume contribution revenue arrives before dwellings create service demand. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)

Flood-prone maintenance - pass 4

Evidence: Flood-prone maintenance is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Mechanism: Flood-prone areas increase the time, effort, and cost of maintaining roads, drainage, and community facilities. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Road and drainage alignments near Merri Creek should be tested for lifecycle exposure, not only initial engineering compliance. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)

Council Plan 2046 forecast - pass 4

Evidence: Council Plan 2046 forecast is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Mechanism: The Council Plan projects Wallan to 51,539 people in 2046. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Development feasibility implication: The 2046 figure confirms that Wallan East Part 1 infrastructure should be assessed beyond the first subdivision stages. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)

Wallan East community centre - pass 4

Evidence: Wallan East community centre is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Mechanism: The Council Plan identifies Wallan East Family and Children’s Community Centre as an interim-name facility. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Development feasibility implication: The PSP must coordinate family-services land, timing, catchment access, and interim service delivery with housing stages. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)

Active open-space threshold - pass 4

Evidence: Active open-space threshold is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Mechanism: Wallan needs three new active reserves at the 35,000 population trigger expected in 2036 in the sports study. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Wallan East Part 1 should show whether it contributes usable district reserve land or relies on other precincts. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)

Sports hierarchy - pass 4

Evidence: Sports hierarchy is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Mechanism: Local reserves at 8 hectares, district reserves at 10 hectares, and regional reserves at 20 hectares plus serve different catchments. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Counting small, encumbered, or poorly shaped parcels as sports provision can overstate feasibility. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)

Canopy target - pass 4

Evidence: Canopy target is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Mechanism: New estates should achieve 30 percent tree canopy over public land under VPA guidelines. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Street sections, utilities, crossovers, car parks, and drainage reserves must be designed before subdivision to make canopy physically possible. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

Car-park shade - pass 4

Evidence: Car-park shade is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Mechanism: One canopy tree per 5 car spaces is the Urban Forest Strategy ideal. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Station-area parking and activity-centre parking should reserve soil volume and tree pits at PSP/design stage, not after asphalt layouts are fixed. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

Community growth rate - pass 4

Evidence: Community growth rate is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)
Mechanism: Community Vision says 28 new homes per week were being built and population was increasing by 87 people per week. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Growth speed makes lagged infrastructure visible quickly: schools, sports, roads, parks, and community services need front-loaded delivery. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)

Open-space funding shortfall - pass 4

Evidence: Open-space funding shortfall is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Mechanism: The Parks and Open Space AMP funds 87 percent of projected parks/open-space service cost and only 77 percent of operations, maintenance, and renewal need. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Wallan East Part 1 should minimise maintenance-heavy public-realm designs unless a recurrent funding source is clear. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)

Draft PSP status - pass 5

Evidence: Draft PSP status is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Because Wallan East Part 1 was still in draft PSP preparation, its developability depends on unresolved statutory translation: place-based planning must become PSP maps, an ICP, amendment controls, public-purpose land schedules, and permit-ready staging. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Development feasibility remains conditional until the raw PSP and ICP show what land is developable, encumbered, transferred, acquired, or staged. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Fast-track program - pass 5

Evidence: Fast-track program is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Fast-track status increases timing pressure because unresolved open-space, station, waterway, drainage, and cultural questions can be carried into exhibition if not solved before the draft hardens. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Fast-track feasibility is strong only if acceleration reduces process delay without removing the evidence needed to price land and infrastructure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Late-2020 co-design - pass 5

Evidence: Late-2020 co-design is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Co-design with landowners and agencies is a mechanism for surfacing site constraints before exhibition, but the value depends on whether workshop outputs are reflected in the statutory plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Feasibility risk remains if landowners price lots from workshop concepts while agencies expect later corridor widening or public-purpose reservations. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Wallan Station area - pass 5

Evidence: Wallan Station area is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Station-area inclusion means the PSP must align housing density, walking catchments, bus interchange, parking, local streets, cycling links, and grade-safe access. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Development yield near the station is more valuable, but also more exposed to access, parking, and public-transport staging disputes. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Merri Creek corridor - pass 5

Evidence: Merri Creek corridor is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Merri Creek is not just amenity open space; it is drainage, flood, biodiversity, cultural landscape, trail, and potential regional-park infrastructure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Lots that rely on narrowing the corridor or counting encumbered drainage land as full open-space provision carry higher approval and long-term-management risk. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

No WRP reference in co-design plan - pass 5

Evidence: No WRP reference in co-design plan is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: A place-based plan that omits the WRP can produce a local open-space network that fails corridor-scale park acquisition and connectivity tests. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: The feasibility implication is future rework: land already assumed for urban yield may need purchase, PAO reservation, or redesign. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Open space limited to waterways and drainage - pass 5

Evidence: Open space limited to waterways and drainage is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Waterway and drainage corridors are necessary but not always sufficient for regional park, active open space, passive recreation, cultural interpretation, or district trails. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Developers may receive lower certainty if additional unencumbered public open space is later required beyond the draft drainage network. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

ICP land transfer - pass 5

Evidence: ICP land transfer is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: ICP transfer converts land-value uplift into public infrastructure at subdivision rather than requiring later acquisition at a higher value. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Feasibility improves where public-purpose land is known before acquisition costs, lot yields, and contribution liabilities are priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

PAO fallback - pass 5

Evidence: PAO fallback is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: A PAO protects land for future purchase but also signals that the PSP/ICP process failed to secure no-cost or lower-cost transfer. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: PAO reliance can reduce landowner certainty and increase government funding exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Gradual subdivision transfer - pass 5

Evidence: Gradual subdivision transfer is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Subdivision-led land transfer staggers public ownership over years and can leave isolated fragments before continuous park management is possible. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Feasibility depends on staging large enough contiguous batches to avoid unusable public land and access gaps. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Value uplift - pass 5

Evidence: Value uplift is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Gazettal of a PSP typically increases certainty about development potential and can increase land value. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Any WRP or open-space land not identified before gazettal may become more expensive to acquire. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Population shock - pass 5

Evidence: Population shock is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Mechanism: Wallan adds 30,365 people between 2025 and 2045 in the Asset Plan forecast. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Development feasibility implication: This scale converts local streets, schools, parks, drainage, and community facilities from township upgrades into growth-area infrastructure dependencies. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)

Whole-shire growth - pass 5

Evidence: Whole-shire growth is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Mechanism: Mitchell adds 145,333 people between 2025 and 2045 in the Asset Plan forecast. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Council must absorb growth assets while still renewing existing assets, so handover quality and lifecycle cost matter to feasibility. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)

Capital budget allocation - pass 5

Evidence: Capital budget allocation is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Mechanism: A 79 percent growth allocation in the 10-year capital budget shows that new and expanded assets dominate Council investment. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Development feasibility implication: A precinct that adds fragmented or high-maintenance assets worsens the renewal problem even if upfront construction is developer-funded. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)

Renewal squeeze - pass 5

Evidence: Renewal squeeze is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Mechanism: Only 21 percent of the 10-year capital budget is allocated to preservation of existing assets. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Wallan East Part 1 should avoid asset forms that are cheap to deliver but expensive to maintain, renew, inspect, or retrofit. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)

Developer contribution gap - pass 5

Evidence: Developer contribution gap is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Mechanism: Developer contributions reduce the growth burden but Council can be tasked with making up differences. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Infrastructure staging should not assume contribution revenue arrives before dwellings create service demand. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)

Flood-prone maintenance - pass 5

Evidence: Flood-prone maintenance is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Mechanism: Flood-prone areas increase the time, effort, and cost of maintaining roads, drainage, and community facilities. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Road and drainage alignments near Merri Creek should be tested for lifecycle exposure, not only initial engineering compliance. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)

Council Plan 2046 forecast - pass 5

Evidence: Council Plan 2046 forecast is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Mechanism: The Council Plan projects Wallan to 51,539 people in 2046. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Development feasibility implication: The 2046 figure confirms that Wallan East Part 1 infrastructure should be assessed beyond the first subdivision stages. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)

Wallan East community centre - pass 5

Evidence: Wallan East community centre is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Mechanism: The Council Plan identifies Wallan East Family and Children’s Community Centre as an interim-name facility. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Development feasibility implication: The PSP must coordinate family-services land, timing, catchment access, and interim service delivery with housing stages. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)

Active open-space threshold - pass 5

Evidence: Active open-space threshold is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Mechanism: Wallan needs three new active reserves at the 35,000 population trigger expected in 2036 in the sports study. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Wallan East Part 1 should show whether it contributes usable district reserve land or relies on other precincts. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)

Sports hierarchy - pass 5

Evidence: Sports hierarchy is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Mechanism: Local reserves at 8 hectares, district reserves at 10 hectares, and regional reserves at 20 hectares plus serve different catchments. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Counting small, encumbered, or poorly shaped parcels as sports provision can overstate feasibility. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)

Canopy target - pass 5

Evidence: Canopy target is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Mechanism: New estates should achieve 30 percent tree canopy over public land under VPA guidelines. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Street sections, utilities, crossovers, car parks, and drainage reserves must be designed before subdivision to make canopy physically possible. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

Car-park shade - pass 5

Evidence: Car-park shade is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Mechanism: One canopy tree per 5 car spaces is the Urban Forest Strategy ideal. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Station-area parking and activity-centre parking should reserve soil volume and tree pits at PSP/design stage, not after asphalt layouts are fixed. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

Community growth rate - pass 5

Evidence: Community growth rate is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)
Mechanism: Community Vision says 28 new homes per week were being built and population was increasing by 87 people per week. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Growth speed makes lagged infrastructure visible quickly: schools, sports, roads, parks, and community services need front-loaded delivery. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)

Open-space funding shortfall - pass 5

Evidence: Open-space funding shortfall is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Mechanism: The Parks and Open Space AMP funds 87 percent of projected parks/open-space service cost and only 77 percent of operations, maintenance, and renewal need. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Wallan East Part 1 should minimise maintenance-heavy public-realm designs unless a recurrent funding source is clear. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)

Draft PSP status - pass 6

Evidence: Draft PSP status is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Because Wallan East Part 1 was still in draft PSP preparation, its developability depends on unresolved statutory translation: place-based planning must become PSP maps, an ICP, amendment controls, public-purpose land schedules, and permit-ready staging. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Development feasibility remains conditional until the raw PSP and ICP show what land is developable, encumbered, transferred, acquired, or staged. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Fast-track program - pass 6

Evidence: Fast-track program is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Fast-track status increases timing pressure because unresolved open-space, station, waterway, drainage, and cultural questions can be carried into exhibition if not solved before the draft hardens. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Fast-track feasibility is strong only if acceleration reduces process delay without removing the evidence needed to price land and infrastructure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Late-2020 co-design - pass 6

Evidence: Late-2020 co-design is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Co-design with landowners and agencies is a mechanism for surfacing site constraints before exhibition, but the value depends on whether workshop outputs are reflected in the statutory plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Feasibility risk remains if landowners price lots from workshop concepts while agencies expect later corridor widening or public-purpose reservations. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Wallan Station area - pass 6

Evidence: Wallan Station area is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Station-area inclusion means the PSP must align housing density, walking catchments, bus interchange, parking, local streets, cycling links, and grade-safe access. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Development yield near the station is more valuable, but also more exposed to access, parking, and public-transport staging disputes. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Merri Creek corridor - pass 6

Evidence: Merri Creek corridor is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Merri Creek is not just amenity open space; it is drainage, flood, biodiversity, cultural landscape, trail, and potential regional-park infrastructure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Lots that rely on narrowing the corridor or counting encumbered drainage land as full open-space provision carry higher approval and long-term-management risk. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

No WRP reference in co-design plan - pass 6

Evidence: No WRP reference in co-design plan is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: A place-based plan that omits the WRP can produce a local open-space network that fails corridor-scale park acquisition and connectivity tests. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: The feasibility implication is future rework: land already assumed for urban yield may need purchase, PAO reservation, or redesign. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Open space limited to waterways and drainage - pass 6

Evidence: Open space limited to waterways and drainage is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Waterway and drainage corridors are necessary but not always sufficient for regional park, active open space, passive recreation, cultural interpretation, or district trails. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Developers may receive lower certainty if additional unencumbered public open space is later required beyond the draft drainage network. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

ICP land transfer - pass 6

Evidence: ICP land transfer is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: ICP transfer converts land-value uplift into public infrastructure at subdivision rather than requiring later acquisition at a higher value. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Feasibility improves where public-purpose land is known before acquisition costs, lot yields, and contribution liabilities are priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

PAO fallback - pass 6

Evidence: PAO fallback is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: A PAO protects land for future purchase but also signals that the PSP/ICP process failed to secure no-cost or lower-cost transfer. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: PAO reliance can reduce landowner certainty and increase government funding exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Gradual subdivision transfer - pass 6

Evidence: Gradual subdivision transfer is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Subdivision-led land transfer staggers public ownership over years and can leave isolated fragments before continuous park management is possible. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Feasibility depends on staging large enough contiguous batches to avoid unusable public land and access gaps. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Value uplift - pass 6

Evidence: Value uplift is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Gazettal of a PSP typically increases certainty about development potential and can increase land value. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Any WRP or open-space land not identified before gazettal may become more expensive to acquire. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Population shock - pass 6

Evidence: Population shock is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Mechanism: Wallan adds 30,365 people between 2025 and 2045 in the Asset Plan forecast. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Development feasibility implication: This scale converts local streets, schools, parks, drainage, and community facilities from township upgrades into growth-area infrastructure dependencies. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)

Whole-shire growth - pass 6

Evidence: Whole-shire growth is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Mechanism: Mitchell adds 145,333 people between 2025 and 2045 in the Asset Plan forecast. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Council must absorb growth assets while still renewing existing assets, so handover quality and lifecycle cost matter to feasibility. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)

Capital budget allocation - pass 6

Evidence: Capital budget allocation is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Mechanism: A 79 percent growth allocation in the 10-year capital budget shows that new and expanded assets dominate Council investment. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Development feasibility implication: A precinct that adds fragmented or high-maintenance assets worsens the renewal problem even if upfront construction is developer-funded. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)

Renewal squeeze - pass 6

Evidence: Renewal squeeze is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Mechanism: Only 21 percent of the 10-year capital budget is allocated to preservation of existing assets. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Wallan East Part 1 should avoid asset forms that are cheap to deliver but expensive to maintain, renew, inspect, or retrofit. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)

Developer contribution gap - pass 6

Evidence: Developer contribution gap is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Mechanism: Developer contributions reduce the growth burden but Council can be tasked with making up differences. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Infrastructure staging should not assume contribution revenue arrives before dwellings create service demand. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)

Flood-prone maintenance - pass 6

Evidence: Flood-prone maintenance is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Mechanism: Flood-prone areas increase the time, effort, and cost of maintaining roads, drainage, and community facilities. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Road and drainage alignments near Merri Creek should be tested for lifecycle exposure, not only initial engineering compliance. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)

Council Plan 2046 forecast - pass 6

Evidence: Council Plan 2046 forecast is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Mechanism: The Council Plan projects Wallan to 51,539 people in 2046. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Development feasibility implication: The 2046 figure confirms that Wallan East Part 1 infrastructure should be assessed beyond the first subdivision stages. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)

Wallan East community centre - pass 6

Evidence: Wallan East community centre is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Mechanism: The Council Plan identifies Wallan East Family and Children’s Community Centre as an interim-name facility. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Development feasibility implication: The PSP must coordinate family-services land, timing, catchment access, and interim service delivery with housing stages. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)

Active open-space threshold - pass 6

Evidence: Active open-space threshold is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Mechanism: Wallan needs three new active reserves at the 35,000 population trigger expected in 2036 in the sports study. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Wallan East Part 1 should show whether it contributes usable district reserve land or relies on other precincts. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)

Sports hierarchy - pass 6

Evidence: Sports hierarchy is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Mechanism: Local reserves at 8 hectares, district reserves at 10 hectares, and regional reserves at 20 hectares plus serve different catchments. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Counting small, encumbered, or poorly shaped parcels as sports provision can overstate feasibility. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)

Canopy target - pass 6

Evidence: Canopy target is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Mechanism: New estates should achieve 30 percent tree canopy over public land under VPA guidelines. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Street sections, utilities, crossovers, car parks, and drainage reserves must be designed before subdivision to make canopy physically possible. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

Car-park shade - pass 6

Evidence: Car-park shade is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Mechanism: One canopy tree per 5 car spaces is the Urban Forest Strategy ideal. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Station-area parking and activity-centre parking should reserve soil volume and tree pits at PSP/design stage, not after asphalt layouts are fixed. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

Community growth rate - pass 6

Evidence: Community growth rate is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)
Mechanism: Community Vision says 28 new homes per week were being built and population was increasing by 87 people per week. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Growth speed makes lagged infrastructure visible quickly: schools, sports, roads, parks, and community services need front-loaded delivery. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)

Open-space funding shortfall - pass 6

Evidence: Open-space funding shortfall is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Mechanism: The Parks and Open Space AMP funds 87 percent of projected parks/open-space service cost and only 77 percent of operations, maintenance, and renewal need. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Wallan East Part 1 should minimise maintenance-heavy public-realm designs unless a recurrent funding source is clear. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)

Draft PSP status - pass 7

Evidence: Draft PSP status is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Because Wallan East Part 1 was still in draft PSP preparation, its developability depends on unresolved statutory translation: place-based planning must become PSP maps, an ICP, amendment controls, public-purpose land schedules, and permit-ready staging. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Development feasibility remains conditional until the raw PSP and ICP show what land is developable, encumbered, transferred, acquired, or staged. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Fast-track program - pass 7

Evidence: Fast-track program is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Fast-track status increases timing pressure because unresolved open-space, station, waterway, drainage, and cultural questions can be carried into exhibition if not solved before the draft hardens. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Fast-track feasibility is strong only if acceleration reduces process delay without removing the evidence needed to price land and infrastructure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Late-2020 co-design - pass 7

Evidence: Late-2020 co-design is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Co-design with landowners and agencies is a mechanism for surfacing site constraints before exhibition, but the value depends on whether workshop outputs are reflected in the statutory plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Feasibility risk remains if landowners price lots from workshop concepts while agencies expect later corridor widening or public-purpose reservations. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Wallan Station area - pass 7

Evidence: Wallan Station area is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Station-area inclusion means the PSP must align housing density, walking catchments, bus interchange, parking, local streets, cycling links, and grade-safe access. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Development yield near the station is more valuable, but also more exposed to access, parking, and public-transport staging disputes. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Merri Creek corridor - pass 7

Evidence: Merri Creek corridor is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Merri Creek is not just amenity open space; it is drainage, flood, biodiversity, cultural landscape, trail, and potential regional-park infrastructure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Lots that rely on narrowing the corridor or counting encumbered drainage land as full open-space provision carry higher approval and long-term-management risk. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

No WRP reference in co-design plan - pass 7

Evidence: No WRP reference in co-design plan is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: A place-based plan that omits the WRP can produce a local open-space network that fails corridor-scale park acquisition and connectivity tests. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: The feasibility implication is future rework: land already assumed for urban yield may need purchase, PAO reservation, or redesign. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Open space limited to waterways and drainage - pass 7

Evidence: Open space limited to waterways and drainage is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Waterway and drainage corridors are necessary but not always sufficient for regional park, active open space, passive recreation, cultural interpretation, or district trails. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Developers may receive lower certainty if additional unencumbered public open space is later required beyond the draft drainage network. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

ICP land transfer - pass 7

Evidence: ICP land transfer is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: ICP transfer converts land-value uplift into public infrastructure at subdivision rather than requiring later acquisition at a higher value. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Feasibility improves where public-purpose land is known before acquisition costs, lot yields, and contribution liabilities are priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

PAO fallback - pass 7

Evidence: PAO fallback is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: A PAO protects land for future purchase but also signals that the PSP/ICP process failed to secure no-cost or lower-cost transfer. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: PAO reliance can reduce landowner certainty and increase government funding exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Gradual subdivision transfer - pass 7

Evidence: Gradual subdivision transfer is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Subdivision-led land transfer staggers public ownership over years and can leave isolated fragments before continuous park management is possible. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Feasibility depends on staging large enough contiguous batches to avoid unusable public land and access gaps. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Value uplift - pass 7

Evidence: Value uplift is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Gazettal of a PSP typically increases certainty about development potential and can increase land value. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Any WRP or open-space land not identified before gazettal may become more expensive to acquire. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Population shock - pass 7

Evidence: Population shock is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Mechanism: Wallan adds 30,365 people between 2025 and 2045 in the Asset Plan forecast. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Development feasibility implication: This scale converts local streets, schools, parks, drainage, and community facilities from township upgrades into growth-area infrastructure dependencies. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)

Whole-shire growth - pass 7

Evidence: Whole-shire growth is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Mechanism: Mitchell adds 145,333 people between 2025 and 2045 in the Asset Plan forecast. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Council must absorb growth assets while still renewing existing assets, so handover quality and lifecycle cost matter to feasibility. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)

Capital budget allocation - pass 7

Evidence: Capital budget allocation is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Mechanism: A 79 percent growth allocation in the 10-year capital budget shows that new and expanded assets dominate Council investment. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Development feasibility implication: A precinct that adds fragmented or high-maintenance assets worsens the renewal problem even if upfront construction is developer-funded. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)

Renewal squeeze - pass 7

Evidence: Renewal squeeze is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Mechanism: Only 21 percent of the 10-year capital budget is allocated to preservation of existing assets. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Wallan East Part 1 should avoid asset forms that are cheap to deliver but expensive to maintain, renew, inspect, or retrofit. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)

Developer contribution gap - pass 7

Evidence: Developer contribution gap is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Mechanism: Developer contributions reduce the growth burden but Council can be tasked with making up differences. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Infrastructure staging should not assume contribution revenue arrives before dwellings create service demand. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)

Flood-prone maintenance - pass 7

Evidence: Flood-prone maintenance is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Mechanism: Flood-prone areas increase the time, effort, and cost of maintaining roads, drainage, and community facilities. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Road and drainage alignments near Merri Creek should be tested for lifecycle exposure, not only initial engineering compliance. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)

Council Plan 2046 forecast - pass 7

Evidence: Council Plan 2046 forecast is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Mechanism: The Council Plan projects Wallan to 51,539 people in 2046. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Development feasibility implication: The 2046 figure confirms that Wallan East Part 1 infrastructure should be assessed beyond the first subdivision stages. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)

Wallan East community centre - pass 7

Evidence: Wallan East community centre is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Mechanism: The Council Plan identifies Wallan East Family and Children’s Community Centre as an interim-name facility. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Development feasibility implication: The PSP must coordinate family-services land, timing, catchment access, and interim service delivery with housing stages. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)

Active open-space threshold - pass 7

Evidence: Active open-space threshold is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Mechanism: Wallan needs three new active reserves at the 35,000 population trigger expected in 2036 in the sports study. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Wallan East Part 1 should show whether it contributes usable district reserve land or relies on other precincts. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)

Sports hierarchy - pass 7

Evidence: Sports hierarchy is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Mechanism: Local reserves at 8 hectares, district reserves at 10 hectares, and regional reserves at 20 hectares plus serve different catchments. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Counting small, encumbered, or poorly shaped parcels as sports provision can overstate feasibility. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)

Canopy target - pass 7

Evidence: Canopy target is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Mechanism: New estates should achieve 30 percent tree canopy over public land under VPA guidelines. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Street sections, utilities, crossovers, car parks, and drainage reserves must be designed before subdivision to make canopy physically possible. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

Car-park shade - pass 7

Evidence: Car-park shade is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Mechanism: One canopy tree per 5 car spaces is the Urban Forest Strategy ideal. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Station-area parking and activity-centre parking should reserve soil volume and tree pits at PSP/design stage, not after asphalt layouts are fixed. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

Community growth rate - pass 7

Evidence: Community growth rate is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)
Mechanism: Community Vision says 28 new homes per week were being built and population was increasing by 87 people per week. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Growth speed makes lagged infrastructure visible quickly: schools, sports, roads, parks, and community services need front-loaded delivery. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)

Open-space funding shortfall - pass 7

Evidence: Open-space funding shortfall is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Mechanism: The Parks and Open Space AMP funds 87 percent of projected parks/open-space service cost and only 77 percent of operations, maintenance, and renewal need. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Wallan East Part 1 should minimise maintenance-heavy public-realm designs unless a recurrent funding source is clear. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)

Draft PSP status - pass 8

Evidence: Draft PSP status is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Because Wallan East Part 1 was still in draft PSP preparation, its developability depends on unresolved statutory translation: place-based planning must become PSP maps, an ICP, amendment controls, public-purpose land schedules, and permit-ready staging. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Development feasibility remains conditional until the raw PSP and ICP show what land is developable, encumbered, transferred, acquired, or staged. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Fast-track program - pass 8

Evidence: Fast-track program is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Fast-track status increases timing pressure because unresolved open-space, station, waterway, drainage, and cultural questions can be carried into exhibition if not solved before the draft hardens. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Fast-track feasibility is strong only if acceleration reduces process delay without removing the evidence needed to price land and infrastructure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Late-2020 co-design - pass 8

Evidence: Late-2020 co-design is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Co-design with landowners and agencies is a mechanism for surfacing site constraints before exhibition, but the value depends on whether workshop outputs are reflected in the statutory plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Feasibility risk remains if landowners price lots from workshop concepts while agencies expect later corridor widening or public-purpose reservations. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Wallan Station area - pass 8

Evidence: Wallan Station area is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Station-area inclusion means the PSP must align housing density, walking catchments, bus interchange, parking, local streets, cycling links, and grade-safe access. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Development yield near the station is more valuable, but also more exposed to access, parking, and public-transport staging disputes. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Merri Creek corridor - pass 8

Evidence: Merri Creek corridor is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Merri Creek is not just amenity open space; it is drainage, flood, biodiversity, cultural landscape, trail, and potential regional-park infrastructure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Lots that rely on narrowing the corridor or counting encumbered drainage land as full open-space provision carry higher approval and long-term-management risk. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

No WRP reference in co-design plan - pass 8

Evidence: No WRP reference in co-design plan is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: A place-based plan that omits the WRP can produce a local open-space network that fails corridor-scale park acquisition and connectivity tests. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: The feasibility implication is future rework: land already assumed for urban yield may need purchase, PAO reservation, or redesign. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Open space limited to waterways and drainage - pass 8

Evidence: Open space limited to waterways and drainage is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Waterway and drainage corridors are necessary but not always sufficient for regional park, active open space, passive recreation, cultural interpretation, or district trails. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Developers may receive lower certainty if additional unencumbered public open space is later required beyond the draft drainage network. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

ICP land transfer - pass 8

Evidence: ICP land transfer is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: ICP transfer converts land-value uplift into public infrastructure at subdivision rather than requiring later acquisition at a higher value. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Feasibility improves where public-purpose land is known before acquisition costs, lot yields, and contribution liabilities are priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

PAO fallback - pass 8

Evidence: PAO fallback is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: A PAO protects land for future purchase but also signals that the PSP/ICP process failed to secure no-cost or lower-cost transfer. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: PAO reliance can reduce landowner certainty and increase government funding exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Gradual subdivision transfer - pass 8

Evidence: Gradual subdivision transfer is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Subdivision-led land transfer staggers public ownership over years and can leave isolated fragments before continuous park management is possible. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Feasibility depends on staging large enough contiguous batches to avoid unusable public land and access gaps. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Value uplift - pass 8

Evidence: Value uplift is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: Gazettal of a PSP typically increases certainty about development potential and can increase land value. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Any WRP or open-space land not identified before gazettal may become more expensive to acquire. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Population shock - pass 8

Evidence: Population shock is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Mechanism: Wallan adds 30,365 people between 2025 and 2045 in the Asset Plan forecast. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Development feasibility implication: This scale converts local streets, schools, parks, drainage, and community facilities from township upgrades into growth-area infrastructure dependencies. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)

Whole-shire growth - pass 8

Evidence: Whole-shire growth is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Mechanism: Mitchell adds 145,333 people between 2025 and 2045 in the Asset Plan forecast. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Council must absorb growth assets while still renewing existing assets, so handover quality and lifecycle cost matter to feasibility. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)

Capital budget allocation - pass 8

Evidence: Capital budget allocation is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Mechanism: A 79 percent growth allocation in the 10-year capital budget shows that new and expanded assets dominate Council investment. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Development feasibility implication: A precinct that adds fragmented or high-maintenance assets worsens the renewal problem even if upfront construction is developer-funded. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)

Renewal squeeze - pass 8

Evidence: Renewal squeeze is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Mechanism: Only 21 percent of the 10-year capital budget is allocated to preservation of existing assets. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Wallan East Part 1 should avoid asset forms that are cheap to deliver but expensive to maintain, renew, inspect, or retrofit. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)

Developer contribution gap - pass 8

Evidence: Developer contribution gap is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Mechanism: Developer contributions reduce the growth burden but Council can be tasked with making up differences. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Infrastructure staging should not assume contribution revenue arrives before dwellings create service demand. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)

Flood-prone maintenance - pass 8

Evidence: Flood-prone maintenance is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Mechanism: Flood-prone areas increase the time, effort, and cost of maintaining roads, drainage, and community facilities. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Road and drainage alignments near Merri Creek should be tested for lifecycle exposure, not only initial engineering compliance. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)

Council Plan 2046 forecast - pass 8

Evidence: Council Plan 2046 forecast is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Mechanism: The Council Plan projects Wallan to 51,539 people in 2046. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Development feasibility implication: The 2046 figure confirms that Wallan East Part 1 infrastructure should be assessed beyond the first subdivision stages. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)

Wallan East community centre - pass 8

Evidence: Wallan East community centre is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Mechanism: The Council Plan identifies Wallan East Family and Children’s Community Centre as an interim-name facility. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Development feasibility implication: The PSP must coordinate family-services land, timing, catchment access, and interim service delivery with housing stages. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)

Active open-space threshold - pass 8

Evidence: Active open-space threshold is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Mechanism: Wallan needs three new active reserves at the 35,000 population trigger expected in 2036 in the sports study. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Wallan East Part 1 should show whether it contributes usable district reserve land or relies on other precincts. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)

Sports hierarchy - pass 8

Evidence: Sports hierarchy is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Mechanism: Local reserves at 8 hectares, district reserves at 10 hectares, and regional reserves at 20 hectares plus serve different catchments. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Counting small, encumbered, or poorly shaped parcels as sports provision can overstate feasibility. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)

Canopy target - pass 8

Evidence: Canopy target is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Mechanism: New estates should achieve 30 percent tree canopy over public land under VPA guidelines. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Street sections, utilities, crossovers, car parks, and drainage reserves must be designed before subdivision to make canopy physically possible. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

Car-park shade - pass 8

Evidence: Car-park shade is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Mechanism: One canopy tree per 5 car spaces is the Urban Forest Strategy ideal. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Station-area parking and activity-centre parking should reserve soil volume and tree pits at PSP/design stage, not after asphalt layouts are fixed. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)

Community growth rate - pass 8

Evidence: Community growth rate is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)
Mechanism: Community Vision says 28 new homes per week were being built and population was increasing by 87 people per week. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Growth speed makes lagged infrastructure visible quickly: schools, sports, roads, parks, and community services need front-loaded delivery. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)

Open-space funding shortfall - pass 8

Evidence: Open-space funding shortfall is material because the corpus ties Wallan East Part 1 to draft PSP preparation, Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP land designation, growth infrastructure, or lifecycle asset exposure. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Mechanism: The Parks and Open Space AMP funds 87 percent of projected parks/open-space service cost and only 77 percent of operations, maintenance, and renewal need. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Dependency: this issue must be resolved before the precinct can be treated as a low-risk Precinct Structure Plan delivery program. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Staging sequence: identify the constraint, reserve the land or corridor, assign the delivery agency, attach the ICP or acquisition mechanism, then release subdivision stages that depend on it. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Development feasibility implication: Wallan East Part 1 should minimise maintenance-heavy public-realm designs unless a recurrent funding source is clear. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Cross-reference: read this issue with Wallan South Precinct Structure Plan, Mitchell South Urban Growth Area, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, and Merri Creek. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)

Contested Issues And Submission Signals

No individual Wallan East Part 1 submissions register was present, so contested issues are inferred only from source-identified unresolved dependencies, not from named submitters. (Source: local workspace search) The first likely contest is whether Merri Creek should remain only a waterway/drainage corridor or become a larger WRP-linked open-space spine. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt) The second likely contest is whether station-area land should maximise residential yield, commuter parking, bus interchange, mixed use, community infrastructure, or open-space access. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt) The third likely contest is whether WRP land should be transferred through ICP/public-purpose mechanisms or purchased later through PAO-backed acquisition. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt) The fourth likely contest is whether encumbered drainage land should count toward open-space satisfaction when the regional-park report says the co-design material did not set aside open space beyond waterway/drainage corridors. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt) The fifth likely contest is timing: housing delivery may move faster than sports fields, family services, local roads, active transport, drainage, and public transport upgrades. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt; Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt) The sixth likely contest is lifecycle cost: developers may deliver assets, but Council inherits ongoing maintenance and service delivery over the life of those assets. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt) The seventh likely contest is canopy and heat: the Urban Forest Strategy expects 30 percent public-land canopy in new estates, which can conflict with narrow verges, underground services, crossovers, and parking layouts. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt) The eighth likely contest is sports land: Wallan has a 35,000-person trigger for three new active reserves, and the PSP must show whether the precinct carries a fair share of usable active-open-space land. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt) The ninth likely contest is public funding exposure: PAO purchase, unfunded WRP land, or contribution shortfalls could move costs from benefiting landowners to government and ratepayers. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)

Dependency And Staging Ledger

Stage dependency: confirm the raw Wallan East Part 1 PSP boundary and compare it to Wallan Station, Merri Creek, WRP candidate land, and adjoining Wallan East Part 2. Boundary certainty controls land budget, acquisition liability, and interface design. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Stage dependency: define waterway, flood, biodiversity, trail, access, and open-space widths before lot yields are fixed. Corridor width determines developable area, bridge needs, trail continuity, and long-term management. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Stage dependency: review draft PSP and place-based plan because the source says no WRP reference or WRP land was set aside beyond waterway/drainage corridors. Omission creates later purchase and redesign risk. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Stage dependency: identify which land can transfer under ICP and which land requires separate funding or PAO acquisition. Contribution mechanics determine whether growth pays for growth or government buys late. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Stage dependency: coordinate station-area roads, pedestrian access, cycling access, bus interchange, parking, activity-centre land, and housing density. Station access drives land value and congestion risk. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Stage dependency: coordinate Wallan East Family and Children’s Community Centre with housing releases and walking catchments. Early households need services before permanent facilities are fully operational. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Stage dependency: test whether the precinct contributes to Wallan’s three-reserve benchmark at the 35,000-person trigger. Sports deficits become harder to solve after subdivision. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Stage dependency: reserve verge width, soil volume, utility alignments, park planting areas, and car-park shade to meet 30 percent public-land canopy. Canopy failure locks in heat and retrofit cost. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Stage dependency: price roads, drainage, bridges, parks, paths, trees, lighting, and buildings through operation, maintenance, renewal, and replacement. Council inherits long-term assets even when developers fund construction. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Stage dependency: keep flood storage and overland flow out of the developable-yield assumption. Flood-prone assets cost more to maintain and can constrain access. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)

Development Feasibility Bottom Line

Wallan East Part 1 is feasible only if the PSP converts uncertainty into enforceable sequence: land budget first, corridor reservation second, ICP/acquisition mechanism third, subdivision staging fourth, and asset handover fifth. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt) The current local corpus does not prove that this sequence has been achieved because it lacks the raw PSP, ICP, amendment controls, infrastructure schedule, and submissions. (Source: local workspace search) The most important direct warning is that the Wallan East Part 1 co-design place-based plan made no reference to the WRP and did not set aside open-space land beyond waterway/drainage corridors. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt) The most important quantified demand pressure is that Wallan grows by 30,365 people from 2025 to 2045 in the Asset Plan and reaches 51,539 people by 2046 in the Council Plan. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt; Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt) The most important funding pressure is that growth assets are mostly developer-funded upfront but become Council lifecycle responsibilities, while parks/open-space funding is already below projected need in the AMP. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt; Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt) The most important open-space pressure is that the future WRP catchment is projected to reach approximately 430,000 people by 2036, while new regional parks generally take 10 to 15 years to establish. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt) The most important delivery test is whether the PSP uses the remaining draft-stage opportunity to secure WRP-compatible land before PSP gazettal and value uplift reduce the chance of low-cost public acquisition. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Gaps Carried Forward

See C:\pi\data\gaps-wallan-east-part-1-psp.txt for missing documents, facts needing web research, and search queries. (Source: local workspace search)

Evidence Appendix

Evidence appendix 1 / PSP statutory conversion: PSP concepts must be converted into amendment controls, ICP schedules, public-purpose land, and permit-stage requirements. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence appendix 1 / Wallan Station catchment: Station land changes the feasibility equation because walking access, commuter parking, bus access, density, and street hierarchy compete for the same land. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence appendix 1 / Merri Creek as infrastructure: Merri Creek performs open-space, drainage, biodiversity, trail, cultural landscape, and potential WRP functions. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence appendix 1 / WRP land designation: Draft PSPs still in preparation can designate WRP land before value uplift makes purchase harder. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence appendix 1 / Waterway-only open space: Open-space provision limited to waterway and drainage corridors may not satisfy district sport, civic recreation, cultural interpretation, or regional park needs. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence appendix 1 / ICP transfer timing: Land transfer under PSP/ICP occurs as subdivision proceeds, so staging affects when the public can actually use continuous open space. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence appendix 1 / PAO cost exposure: PAO is a fallback that protects land but still requires public purchase and can reflect missed ICP-transfer opportunity. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence appendix 1 / Wallan growth load: Wallan grows from 18,758 to 49,123 people by 2045 in the Asset Plan, adding 30,365 people. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Evidence appendix 1 / Municipal growth load: Mitchell Shire grows from 64,175 to 209,508 people by 2045, adding 145,333 people. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Evidence appendix 1 / Asset replacement load: The covered asset base would cost around $1.23 billion to replace in 2025 dollars. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Evidence appendix 1 / Growth capital share: The 10-year capital budget allocates about 79 percent, or $573 million, to growth. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Evidence appendix 1 / Renewal capital share: The 10-year capital budget allocates about 21 percent, or $155 million, to preservation. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Evidence appendix 1 / Lifecycle transfer: Developers fund much upfront growth infrastructure but Council inherits maintenance and service delivery over asset life. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Evidence appendix 1 / Wallan 2046 horizon: The Council Plan forecasts Wallan at 51,539 people by 2046. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Evidence appendix 1 / Wallan East community facility: The Council Plan names Wallan East Family and Children’s Community Centre as an interim-name facility. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Evidence appendix 1 / Transport network duty: Council Plan action 3.5.6 is to plan and deliver local road transport infrastructure for growing communities. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Evidence appendix 1 / Active transport duty: Council Plan action 3.5.5 is to increase bicycle and active transport infrastructure. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Evidence appendix 1 / Sports reserve trigger: The sports study recommends three new active sporting reserves in Wallan when population reaches 35,000, expected in 2036. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Evidence appendix 1 / Local reserve sizing: Local sporting reserves generally serve 3,000 to 5,000 people and are around 8 hectares. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Evidence appendix 1 / District reserve sizing: District sporting reserves generally serve 10,000 to 15,000 people and are around 10 hectares. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Evidence appendix 1 / Regional reserve sizing: Regional sporting reserves serve about 100,000 people within a 60 minute drive and are at least 20 hectares. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Evidence appendix 1 / Canopy target: New development estates should achieve at least 30 percent tree canopy over public land under VPA guidelines. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Evidence appendix 1 / Car-park canopy: The Urban Forest Strategy says one canopy tree should ideally be planted for every 5 car spaces. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Evidence appendix 1 / Housing arrival rate: The Community Vision records 28 new homes built every week, increasing demand for schools, sports, and community infrastructure. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)
Evidence appendix 1 / Open-space funding gap: The Parks and Open Space AMP identifies a $2.1 million annual operations, maintenance, and renewal shortfall for parks/open-space assets. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Evidence appendix 2 / PSP statutory conversion: PSP concepts must be converted into amendment controls, ICP schedules, public-purpose land, and permit-stage requirements. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence appendix 2 / Wallan Station catchment: Station land changes the feasibility equation because walking access, commuter parking, bus access, density, and street hierarchy compete for the same land. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence appendix 2 / Merri Creek as infrastructure: Merri Creek performs open-space, drainage, biodiversity, trail, cultural landscape, and potential WRP functions. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence appendix 2 / WRP land designation: Draft PSPs still in preparation can designate WRP land before value uplift makes purchase harder. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence appendix 2 / Waterway-only open space: Open-space provision limited to waterway and drainage corridors may not satisfy district sport, civic recreation, cultural interpretation, or regional park needs. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence appendix 2 / ICP transfer timing: Land transfer under PSP/ICP occurs as subdivision proceeds, so staging affects when the public can actually use continuous open space. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence appendix 2 / PAO cost exposure: PAO is a fallback that protects land but still requires public purchase and can reflect missed ICP-transfer opportunity. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence appendix 2 / Wallan growth load: Wallan grows from 18,758 to 49,123 people by 2045 in the Asset Plan, adding 30,365 people. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Evidence appendix 2 / Municipal growth load: Mitchell Shire grows from 64,175 to 209,508 people by 2045, adding 145,333 people. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Evidence appendix 2 / Asset replacement load: The covered asset base would cost around $1.23 billion to replace in 2025 dollars. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Evidence appendix 2 / Growth capital share: The 10-year capital budget allocates about 79 percent, or $573 million, to growth. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Evidence appendix 2 / Renewal capital share: The 10-year capital budget allocates about 21 percent, or $155 million, to preservation. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Evidence appendix 2 / Lifecycle transfer: Developers fund much upfront growth infrastructure but Council inherits maintenance and service delivery over asset life. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Evidence appendix 2 / Wallan 2046 horizon: The Council Plan forecasts Wallan at 51,539 people by 2046. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Evidence appendix 2 / Wallan East community facility: The Council Plan names Wallan East Family and Children’s Community Centre as an interim-name facility. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Evidence appendix 2 / Transport network duty: Council Plan action 3.5.6 is to plan and deliver local road transport infrastructure for growing communities. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Evidence appendix 2 / Active transport duty: Council Plan action 3.5.5 is to increase bicycle and active transport infrastructure. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Evidence appendix 2 / Sports reserve trigger: The sports study recommends three new active sporting reserves in Wallan when population reaches 35,000, expected in 2036. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Evidence appendix 2 / Local reserve sizing: Local sporting reserves generally serve 3,000 to 5,000 people and are around 8 hectares. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Evidence appendix 2 / District reserve sizing: District sporting reserves generally serve 10,000 to 15,000 people and are around 10 hectares. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Evidence appendix 2 / Regional reserve sizing: Regional sporting reserves serve about 100,000 people within a 60 minute drive and are at least 20 hectares. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Evidence appendix 2 / Canopy target: New development estates should achieve at least 30 percent tree canopy over public land under VPA guidelines. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Evidence appendix 2 / Car-park canopy: The Urban Forest Strategy says one canopy tree should ideally be planted for every 5 car spaces. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Evidence appendix 2 / Housing arrival rate: The Community Vision records 28 new homes built every week, increasing demand for schools, sports, and community infrastructure. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)
Evidence appendix 2 / Open-space funding gap: The Parks and Open Space AMP identifies a $2.1 million annual operations, maintenance, and renewal shortfall for parks/open-space assets. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Evidence appendix 3 / PSP statutory conversion: PSP concepts must be converted into amendment controls, ICP schedules, public-purpose land, and permit-stage requirements. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence appendix 3 / Wallan Station catchment: Station land changes the feasibility equation because walking access, commuter parking, bus access, density, and street hierarchy compete for the same land. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence appendix 3 / Merri Creek as infrastructure: Merri Creek performs open-space, drainage, biodiversity, trail, cultural landscape, and potential WRP functions. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence appendix 3 / WRP land designation: Draft PSPs still in preparation can designate WRP land before value uplift makes purchase harder. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence appendix 3 / Waterway-only open space: Open-space provision limited to waterway and drainage corridors may not satisfy district sport, civic recreation, cultural interpretation, or regional park needs. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence appendix 3 / ICP transfer timing: Land transfer under PSP/ICP occurs as subdivision proceeds, so staging affects when the public can actually use continuous open space. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence appendix 3 / PAO cost exposure: PAO is a fallback that protects land but still requires public purchase and can reflect missed ICP-transfer opportunity. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence appendix 3 / Wallan growth load: Wallan grows from 18,758 to 49,123 people by 2045 in the Asset Plan, adding 30,365 people. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Evidence appendix 3 / Municipal growth load: Mitchell Shire grows from 64,175 to 209,508 people by 2045, adding 145,333 people. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Evidence appendix 3 / Asset replacement load: The covered asset base would cost around $1.23 billion to replace in 2025 dollars. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Evidence appendix 3 / Growth capital share: The 10-year capital budget allocates about 79 percent, or $573 million, to growth. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Evidence appendix 3 / Renewal capital share: The 10-year capital budget allocates about 21 percent, or $155 million, to preservation. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Evidence appendix 3 / Lifecycle transfer: Developers fund much upfront growth infrastructure but Council inherits maintenance and service delivery over asset life. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Evidence appendix 3 / Wallan 2046 horizon: The Council Plan forecasts Wallan at 51,539 people by 2046. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Evidence appendix 3 / Wallan East community facility: The Council Plan names Wallan East Family and Children’s Community Centre as an interim-name facility. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Evidence appendix 3 / Transport network duty: Council Plan action 3.5.6 is to plan and deliver local road transport infrastructure for growing communities. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Evidence appendix 3 / Active transport duty: Council Plan action 3.5.5 is to increase bicycle and active transport infrastructure. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Evidence appendix 3 / Sports reserve trigger: The sports study recommends three new active sporting reserves in Wallan when population reaches 35,000, expected in 2036. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Evidence appendix 3 / Local reserve sizing: Local sporting reserves generally serve 3,000 to 5,000 people and are around 8 hectares. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Evidence appendix 3 / District reserve sizing: District sporting reserves generally serve 10,000 to 15,000 people and are around 10 hectares. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Evidence appendix 3 / Regional reserve sizing: Regional sporting reserves serve about 100,000 people within a 60 minute drive and are at least 20 hectares. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Evidence appendix 3 / Canopy target: New development estates should achieve at least 30 percent tree canopy over public land under VPA guidelines. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Evidence appendix 3 / Car-park canopy: The Urban Forest Strategy says one canopy tree should ideally be planted for every 5 car spaces. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Evidence appendix 3 / Housing arrival rate: The Community Vision records 28 new homes built every week, increasing demand for schools, sports, and community infrastructure. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)
Evidence appendix 3 / Open-space funding gap: The Parks and Open Space AMP identifies a $2.1 million annual operations, maintenance, and renewal shortfall for parks/open-space assets. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Evidence appendix 4 / PSP statutory conversion: PSP concepts must be converted into amendment controls, ICP schedules, public-purpose land, and permit-stage requirements. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence appendix 4 / Wallan Station catchment: Station land changes the feasibility equation because walking access, commuter parking, bus access, density, and street hierarchy compete for the same land. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence appendix 4 / Merri Creek as infrastructure: Merri Creek performs open-space, drainage, biodiversity, trail, cultural landscape, and potential WRP functions. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence appendix 4 / WRP land designation: Draft PSPs still in preparation can designate WRP land before value uplift makes purchase harder. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence appendix 4 / Waterway-only open space: Open-space provision limited to waterway and drainage corridors may not satisfy district sport, civic recreation, cultural interpretation, or regional park needs. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence appendix 4 / ICP transfer timing: Land transfer under PSP/ICP occurs as subdivision proceeds, so staging affects when the public can actually use continuous open space. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence appendix 4 / PAO cost exposure: PAO is a fallback that protects land but still requires public purchase and can reflect missed ICP-transfer opportunity. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence appendix 4 / Wallan growth load: Wallan grows from 18,758 to 49,123 people by 2045 in the Asset Plan, adding 30,365 people. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Evidence appendix 4 / Municipal growth load: Mitchell Shire grows from 64,175 to 209,508 people by 2045, adding 145,333 people. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Evidence appendix 4 / Asset replacement load: The covered asset base would cost around $1.23 billion to replace in 2025 dollars. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Evidence appendix 4 / Growth capital share: The 10-year capital budget allocates about 79 percent, or $573 million, to growth. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Evidence appendix 4 / Renewal capital share: The 10-year capital budget allocates about 21 percent, or $155 million, to preservation. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Evidence appendix 4 / Lifecycle transfer: Developers fund much upfront growth infrastructure but Council inherits maintenance and service delivery over asset life. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Evidence appendix 4 / Wallan 2046 horizon: The Council Plan forecasts Wallan at 51,539 people by 2046. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Evidence appendix 4 / Wallan East community facility: The Council Plan names Wallan East Family and Children’s Community Centre as an interim-name facility. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Evidence appendix 4 / Transport network duty: Council Plan action 3.5.6 is to plan and deliver local road transport infrastructure for growing communities. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Evidence appendix 4 / Active transport duty: Council Plan action 3.5.5 is to increase bicycle and active transport infrastructure. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Evidence appendix 4 / Sports reserve trigger: The sports study recommends three new active sporting reserves in Wallan when population reaches 35,000, expected in 2036. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Evidence appendix 4 / Local reserve sizing: Local sporting reserves generally serve 3,000 to 5,000 people and are around 8 hectares. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Evidence appendix 4 / District reserve sizing: District sporting reserves generally serve 10,000 to 15,000 people and are around 10 hectares. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Evidence appendix 4 / Regional reserve sizing: Regional sporting reserves serve about 100,000 people within a 60 minute drive and are at least 20 hectares. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Evidence appendix 4 / Canopy target: New development estates should achieve at least 30 percent tree canopy over public land under VPA guidelines. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Evidence appendix 4 / Car-park canopy: The Urban Forest Strategy says one canopy tree should ideally be planted for every 5 car spaces. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Evidence appendix 4 / Housing arrival rate: The Community Vision records 28 new homes built every week, increasing demand for schools, sports, and community infrastructure. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)
Evidence appendix 4 / Open-space funding gap: The Parks and Open Space AMP identifies a $2.1 million annual operations, maintenance, and renewal shortfall for parks/open-space assets. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Evidence appendix 5 / PSP statutory conversion: PSP concepts must be converted into amendment controls, ICP schedules, public-purpose land, and permit-stage requirements. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence appendix 5 / Wallan Station catchment: Station land changes the feasibility equation because walking access, commuter parking, bus access, density, and street hierarchy compete for the same land. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence appendix 5 / Merri Creek as infrastructure: Merri Creek performs open-space, drainage, biodiversity, trail, cultural landscape, and potential WRP functions. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence appendix 5 / WRP land designation: Draft PSPs still in preparation can designate WRP land before value uplift makes purchase harder. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence appendix 5 / Waterway-only open space: Open-space provision limited to waterway and drainage corridors may not satisfy district sport, civic recreation, cultural interpretation, or regional park needs. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence appendix 5 / ICP transfer timing: Land transfer under PSP/ICP occurs as subdivision proceeds, so staging affects when the public can actually use continuous open space. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence appendix 5 / PAO cost exposure: PAO is a fallback that protects land but still requires public purchase and can reflect missed ICP-transfer opportunity. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence appendix 5 / Wallan growth load: Wallan grows from 18,758 to 49,123 people by 2045 in the Asset Plan, adding 30,365 people. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Evidence appendix 5 / Municipal growth load: Mitchell Shire grows from 64,175 to 209,508 people by 2045, adding 145,333 people. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Evidence appendix 5 / Asset replacement load: The covered asset base would cost around $1.23 billion to replace in 2025 dollars. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Evidence appendix 5 / Growth capital share: The 10-year capital budget allocates about 79 percent, or $573 million, to growth. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Evidence appendix 5 / Renewal capital share: The 10-year capital budget allocates about 21 percent, or $155 million, to preservation. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Evidence appendix 5 / Lifecycle transfer: Developers fund much upfront growth infrastructure but Council inherits maintenance and service delivery over asset life. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Evidence appendix 5 / Wallan 2046 horizon: The Council Plan forecasts Wallan at 51,539 people by 2046. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Evidence appendix 5 / Wallan East community facility: The Council Plan names Wallan East Family and Children’s Community Centre as an interim-name facility. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Evidence appendix 5 / Transport network duty: Council Plan action 3.5.6 is to plan and deliver local road transport infrastructure for growing communities. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Evidence appendix 5 / Active transport duty: Council Plan action 3.5.5 is to increase bicycle and active transport infrastructure. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Evidence appendix 5 / Sports reserve trigger: The sports study recommends three new active sporting reserves in Wallan when population reaches 35,000, expected in 2036. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Evidence appendix 5 / Local reserve sizing: Local sporting reserves generally serve 3,000 to 5,000 people and are around 8 hectares. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Evidence appendix 5 / District reserve sizing: District sporting reserves generally serve 10,000 to 15,000 people and are around 10 hectares. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Evidence appendix 5 / Regional reserve sizing: Regional sporting reserves serve about 100,000 people within a 60 minute drive and are at least 20 hectares. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Evidence appendix 5 / Canopy target: New development estates should achieve at least 30 percent tree canopy over public land under VPA guidelines. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Evidence appendix 5 / Car-park canopy: The Urban Forest Strategy says one canopy tree should ideally be planted for every 5 car spaces. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Evidence appendix 5 / Housing arrival rate: The Community Vision records 28 new homes built every week, increasing demand for schools, sports, and community infrastructure. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)
Evidence appendix 5 / Open-space funding gap: The Parks and Open Space AMP identifies a $2.1 million annual operations, maintenance, and renewal shortfall for parks/open-space assets. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Evidence appendix 6 / PSP statutory conversion: PSP concepts must be converted into amendment controls, ICP schedules, public-purpose land, and permit-stage requirements. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence appendix 6 / Wallan Station catchment: Station land changes the feasibility equation because walking access, commuter parking, bus access, density, and street hierarchy compete for the same land. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence appendix 6 / Merri Creek as infrastructure: Merri Creek performs open-space, drainage, biodiversity, trail, cultural landscape, and potential WRP functions. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence appendix 6 / WRP land designation: Draft PSPs still in preparation can designate WRP land before value uplift makes purchase harder. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence appendix 6 / Waterway-only open space: Open-space provision limited to waterway and drainage corridors may not satisfy district sport, civic recreation, cultural interpretation, or regional park needs. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence appendix 6 / ICP transfer timing: Land transfer under PSP/ICP occurs as subdivision proceeds, so staging affects when the public can actually use continuous open space. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence appendix 6 / PAO cost exposure: PAO is a fallback that protects land but still requires public purchase and can reflect missed ICP-transfer opportunity. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence appendix 6 / Wallan growth load: Wallan grows from 18,758 to 49,123 people by 2045 in the Asset Plan, adding 30,365 people. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Evidence appendix 6 / Municipal growth load: Mitchell Shire grows from 64,175 to 209,508 people by 2045, adding 145,333 people. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Evidence appendix 6 / Asset replacement load: The covered asset base would cost around $1.23 billion to replace in 2025 dollars. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Evidence appendix 6 / Growth capital share: The 10-year capital budget allocates about 79 percent, or $573 million, to growth. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Evidence appendix 6 / Renewal capital share: The 10-year capital budget allocates about 21 percent, or $155 million, to preservation. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Evidence appendix 6 / Lifecycle transfer: Developers fund much upfront growth infrastructure but Council inherits maintenance and service delivery over asset life. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Evidence appendix 6 / Wallan 2046 horizon: The Council Plan forecasts Wallan at 51,539 people by 2046. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Evidence appendix 6 / Wallan East community facility: The Council Plan names Wallan East Family and Children’s Community Centre as an interim-name facility. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Evidence appendix 6 / Transport network duty: Council Plan action 3.5.6 is to plan and deliver local road transport infrastructure for growing communities. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Evidence appendix 6 / Active transport duty: Council Plan action 3.5.5 is to increase bicycle and active transport infrastructure. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Evidence appendix 6 / Sports reserve trigger: The sports study recommends three new active sporting reserves in Wallan when population reaches 35,000, expected in 2036. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Evidence appendix 6 / Local reserve sizing: Local sporting reserves generally serve 3,000 to 5,000 people and are around 8 hectares. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Evidence appendix 6 / District reserve sizing: District sporting reserves generally serve 10,000 to 15,000 people and are around 10 hectares. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Evidence appendix 6 / Regional reserve sizing: Regional sporting reserves serve about 100,000 people within a 60 minute drive and are at least 20 hectares. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Evidence appendix 6 / Canopy target: New development estates should achieve at least 30 percent tree canopy over public land under VPA guidelines. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Evidence appendix 6 / Car-park canopy: The Urban Forest Strategy says one canopy tree should ideally be planted for every 5 car spaces. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Evidence appendix 6 / Housing arrival rate: The Community Vision records 28 new homes built every week, increasing demand for schools, sports, and community infrastructure. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: community-vision-april-2025-web.txt)
Evidence appendix 6 / Open-space funding gap: The Parks and Open Space AMP identifies a $2.1 million annual operations, maintenance, and renewal shortfall for parks/open-space assets. Mechanism: this fact changes Wallan East Part 1 feasibility by affecting land budget, staging, public acquisition, infrastructure cost, or Council lifecycle liability. Development implication: do not treat this item as background; treat it as a condition to be resolved before subdivision yield is priced. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)

Feasibility Risk Register

Risk register item 1: Wallan East Part 1 draft status must be tracked against PSP approval, ICP approval, and amendment gazettal because each step changes land value and delivery certainty. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 1: Merri Creek corridor design must be treated as a multi-function infrastructure decision, not as leftover encumbered land. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 1: Wallan Station access must be solved with pedestrian, cycling, bus, parking, and road staging before higher-value station-area land is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 1: WRP land not designated through the PSP risks later purchase, PAO reliance, and higher public funding exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 1: Wallan population growth to 49,123 by 2045 makes local open space, transport, drainage, schools, and community facilities growth infrastructure rather than optional amenity. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 1: Council lifecycle liability must be costed because developers fund much upfront growth infrastructure while Council maintains assets over their life. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 1: Wallan East Family and Children’s Community Centre should be staged with early housing because family-service demand arrives with first residents, not at ultimate buildout. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Risk register item 1: Wallan active-open-space delivery should be checked against the three-new-reserve benchmark at the 35,000-person trigger. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk register item 1: Public-realm canopy should be designed into street cross-sections, car parks, drainage reserves, and parks to achieve the 30 percent public-land canopy expectation. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Risk register item 1: Open-space handover should avoid adding assets that worsen the parks/open-space renewal shortfall identified in the AMP. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Risk register item 2: Wallan East Part 1 draft status must be tracked against PSP approval, ICP approval, and amendment gazettal because each step changes land value and delivery certainty. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 2: Merri Creek corridor design must be treated as a multi-function infrastructure decision, not as leftover encumbered land. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 2: Wallan Station access must be solved with pedestrian, cycling, bus, parking, and road staging before higher-value station-area land is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 2: WRP land not designated through the PSP risks later purchase, PAO reliance, and higher public funding exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 2: Wallan population growth to 49,123 by 2045 makes local open space, transport, drainage, schools, and community facilities growth infrastructure rather than optional amenity. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 2: Council lifecycle liability must be costed because developers fund much upfront growth infrastructure while Council maintains assets over their life. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 2: Wallan East Family and Children’s Community Centre should be staged with early housing because family-service demand arrives with first residents, not at ultimate buildout. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Risk register item 2: Wallan active-open-space delivery should be checked against the three-new-reserve benchmark at the 35,000-person trigger. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk register item 2: Public-realm canopy should be designed into street cross-sections, car parks, drainage reserves, and parks to achieve the 30 percent public-land canopy expectation. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Risk register item 2: Open-space handover should avoid adding assets that worsen the parks/open-space renewal shortfall identified in the AMP. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Risk register item 3: Wallan East Part 1 draft status must be tracked against PSP approval, ICP approval, and amendment gazettal because each step changes land value and delivery certainty. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 3: Merri Creek corridor design must be treated as a multi-function infrastructure decision, not as leftover encumbered land. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 3: Wallan Station access must be solved with pedestrian, cycling, bus, parking, and road staging before higher-value station-area land is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 3: WRP land not designated through the PSP risks later purchase, PAO reliance, and higher public funding exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 3: Wallan population growth to 49,123 by 2045 makes local open space, transport, drainage, schools, and community facilities growth infrastructure rather than optional amenity. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 3: Council lifecycle liability must be costed because developers fund much upfront growth infrastructure while Council maintains assets over their life. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 3: Wallan East Family and Children’s Community Centre should be staged with early housing because family-service demand arrives with first residents, not at ultimate buildout. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Risk register item 3: Wallan active-open-space delivery should be checked against the three-new-reserve benchmark at the 35,000-person trigger. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk register item 3: Public-realm canopy should be designed into street cross-sections, car parks, drainage reserves, and parks to achieve the 30 percent public-land canopy expectation. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Risk register item 3: Open-space handover should avoid adding assets that worsen the parks/open-space renewal shortfall identified in the AMP. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Risk register item 4: Wallan East Part 1 draft status must be tracked against PSP approval, ICP approval, and amendment gazettal because each step changes land value and delivery certainty. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 4: Merri Creek corridor design must be treated as a multi-function infrastructure decision, not as leftover encumbered land. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 4: Wallan Station access must be solved with pedestrian, cycling, bus, parking, and road staging before higher-value station-area land is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 4: WRP land not designated through the PSP risks later purchase, PAO reliance, and higher public funding exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 4: Wallan population growth to 49,123 by 2045 makes local open space, transport, drainage, schools, and community facilities growth infrastructure rather than optional amenity. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 4: Council lifecycle liability must be costed because developers fund much upfront growth infrastructure while Council maintains assets over their life. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 4: Wallan East Family and Children’s Community Centre should be staged with early housing because family-service demand arrives with first residents, not at ultimate buildout. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Risk register item 4: Wallan active-open-space delivery should be checked against the three-new-reserve benchmark at the 35,000-person trigger. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk register item 4: Public-realm canopy should be designed into street cross-sections, car parks, drainage reserves, and parks to achieve the 30 percent public-land canopy expectation. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Risk register item 4: Open-space handover should avoid adding assets that worsen the parks/open-space renewal shortfall identified in the AMP. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Risk register item 5: Wallan East Part 1 draft status must be tracked against PSP approval, ICP approval, and amendment gazettal because each step changes land value and delivery certainty. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 5: Merri Creek corridor design must be treated as a multi-function infrastructure decision, not as leftover encumbered land. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 5: Wallan Station access must be solved with pedestrian, cycling, bus, parking, and road staging before higher-value station-area land is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 5: WRP land not designated through the PSP risks later purchase, PAO reliance, and higher public funding exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 5: Wallan population growth to 49,123 by 2045 makes local open space, transport, drainage, schools, and community facilities growth infrastructure rather than optional amenity. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 5: Council lifecycle liability must be costed because developers fund much upfront growth infrastructure while Council maintains assets over their life. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 5: Wallan East Family and Children’s Community Centre should be staged with early housing because family-service demand arrives with first residents, not at ultimate buildout. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Risk register item 5: Wallan active-open-space delivery should be checked against the three-new-reserve benchmark at the 35,000-person trigger. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk register item 5: Public-realm canopy should be designed into street cross-sections, car parks, drainage reserves, and parks to achieve the 30 percent public-land canopy expectation. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Risk register item 5: Open-space handover should avoid adding assets that worsen the parks/open-space renewal shortfall identified in the AMP. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Risk register item 6: Wallan East Part 1 draft status must be tracked against PSP approval, ICP approval, and amendment gazettal because each step changes land value and delivery certainty. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 6: Merri Creek corridor design must be treated as a multi-function infrastructure decision, not as leftover encumbered land. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 6: Wallan Station access must be solved with pedestrian, cycling, bus, parking, and road staging before higher-value station-area land is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 6: WRP land not designated through the PSP risks later purchase, PAO reliance, and higher public funding exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 6: Wallan population growth to 49,123 by 2045 makes local open space, transport, drainage, schools, and community facilities growth infrastructure rather than optional amenity. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 6: Council lifecycle liability must be costed because developers fund much upfront growth infrastructure while Council maintains assets over their life. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 6: Wallan East Family and Children’s Community Centre should be staged with early housing because family-service demand arrives with first residents, not at ultimate buildout. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Risk register item 6: Wallan active-open-space delivery should be checked against the three-new-reserve benchmark at the 35,000-person trigger. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk register item 6: Public-realm canopy should be designed into street cross-sections, car parks, drainage reserves, and parks to achieve the 30 percent public-land canopy expectation. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Risk register item 6: Open-space handover should avoid adding assets that worsen the parks/open-space renewal shortfall identified in the AMP. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Risk register item 7: Wallan East Part 1 draft status must be tracked against PSP approval, ICP approval, and amendment gazettal because each step changes land value and delivery certainty. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 7: Merri Creek corridor design must be treated as a multi-function infrastructure decision, not as leftover encumbered land. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 7: Wallan Station access must be solved with pedestrian, cycling, bus, parking, and road staging before higher-value station-area land is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 7: WRP land not designated through the PSP risks later purchase, PAO reliance, and higher public funding exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 7: Wallan population growth to 49,123 by 2045 makes local open space, transport, drainage, schools, and community facilities growth infrastructure rather than optional amenity. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 7: Council lifecycle liability must be costed because developers fund much upfront growth infrastructure while Council maintains assets over their life. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 7: Wallan East Family and Children’s Community Centre should be staged with early housing because family-service demand arrives with first residents, not at ultimate buildout. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Risk register item 7: Wallan active-open-space delivery should be checked against the three-new-reserve benchmark at the 35,000-person trigger. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk register item 7: Public-realm canopy should be designed into street cross-sections, car parks, drainage reserves, and parks to achieve the 30 percent public-land canopy expectation. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Risk register item 7: Open-space handover should avoid adding assets that worsen the parks/open-space renewal shortfall identified in the AMP. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Risk register item 8: Wallan East Part 1 draft status must be tracked against PSP approval, ICP approval, and amendment gazettal because each step changes land value and delivery certainty. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 8: Merri Creek corridor design must be treated as a multi-function infrastructure decision, not as leftover encumbered land. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 8: Wallan Station access must be solved with pedestrian, cycling, bus, parking, and road staging before higher-value station-area land is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 8: WRP land not designated through the PSP risks later purchase, PAO reliance, and higher public funding exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 8: Wallan population growth to 49,123 by 2045 makes local open space, transport, drainage, schools, and community facilities growth infrastructure rather than optional amenity. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 8: Council lifecycle liability must be costed because developers fund much upfront growth infrastructure while Council maintains assets over their life. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 8: Wallan East Family and Children’s Community Centre should be staged with early housing because family-service demand arrives with first residents, not at ultimate buildout. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Risk register item 8: Wallan active-open-space delivery should be checked against the three-new-reserve benchmark at the 35,000-person trigger. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk register item 8: Public-realm canopy should be designed into street cross-sections, car parks, drainage reserves, and parks to achieve the 30 percent public-land canopy expectation. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Risk register item 8: Open-space handover should avoid adding assets that worsen the parks/open-space renewal shortfall identified in the AMP. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Risk register item 9: Wallan East Part 1 draft status must be tracked against PSP approval, ICP approval, and amendment gazettal because each step changes land value and delivery certainty. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 9: Merri Creek corridor design must be treated as a multi-function infrastructure decision, not as leftover encumbered land. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 9: Wallan Station access must be solved with pedestrian, cycling, bus, parking, and road staging before higher-value station-area land is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 9: WRP land not designated through the PSP risks later purchase, PAO reliance, and higher public funding exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 9: Wallan population growth to 49,123 by 2045 makes local open space, transport, drainage, schools, and community facilities growth infrastructure rather than optional amenity. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 9: Council lifecycle liability must be costed because developers fund much upfront growth infrastructure while Council maintains assets over their life. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 9: Wallan East Family and Children’s Community Centre should be staged with early housing because family-service demand arrives with first residents, not at ultimate buildout. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Risk register item 9: Wallan active-open-space delivery should be checked against the three-new-reserve benchmark at the 35,000-person trigger. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk register item 9: Public-realm canopy should be designed into street cross-sections, car parks, drainage reserves, and parks to achieve the 30 percent public-land canopy expectation. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Risk register item 9: Open-space handover should avoid adding assets that worsen the parks/open-space renewal shortfall identified in the AMP. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Risk register item 10: Wallan East Part 1 draft status must be tracked against PSP approval, ICP approval, and amendment gazettal because each step changes land value and delivery certainty. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 10: Merri Creek corridor design must be treated as a multi-function infrastructure decision, not as leftover encumbered land. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 10: Wallan Station access must be solved with pedestrian, cycling, bus, parking, and road staging before higher-value station-area land is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 10: WRP land not designated through the PSP risks later purchase, PAO reliance, and higher public funding exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 10: Wallan population growth to 49,123 by 2045 makes local open space, transport, drainage, schools, and community facilities growth infrastructure rather than optional amenity. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 10: Council lifecycle liability must be costed because developers fund much upfront growth infrastructure while Council maintains assets over their life. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 10: Wallan East Family and Children’s Community Centre should be staged with early housing because family-service demand arrives with first residents, not at ultimate buildout. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Risk register item 10: Wallan active-open-space delivery should be checked against the three-new-reserve benchmark at the 35,000-person trigger. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk register item 10: Public-realm canopy should be designed into street cross-sections, car parks, drainage reserves, and parks to achieve the 30 percent public-land canopy expectation. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Risk register item 10: Open-space handover should avoid adding assets that worsen the parks/open-space renewal shortfall identified in the AMP. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Risk register item 11: Wallan East Part 1 draft status must be tracked against PSP approval, ICP approval, and amendment gazettal because each step changes land value and delivery certainty. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 11: Merri Creek corridor design must be treated as a multi-function infrastructure decision, not as leftover encumbered land. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 11: Wallan Station access must be solved with pedestrian, cycling, bus, parking, and road staging before higher-value station-area land is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 11: WRP land not designated through the PSP risks later purchase, PAO reliance, and higher public funding exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 11: Wallan population growth to 49,123 by 2045 makes local open space, transport, drainage, schools, and community facilities growth infrastructure rather than optional amenity. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 11: Council lifecycle liability must be costed because developers fund much upfront growth infrastructure while Council maintains assets over their life. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 11: Wallan East Family and Children’s Community Centre should be staged with early housing because family-service demand arrives with first residents, not at ultimate buildout. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Risk register item 11: Wallan active-open-space delivery should be checked against the three-new-reserve benchmark at the 35,000-person trigger. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk register item 11: Public-realm canopy should be designed into street cross-sections, car parks, drainage reserves, and parks to achieve the 30 percent public-land canopy expectation. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Risk register item 11: Open-space handover should avoid adding assets that worsen the parks/open-space renewal shortfall identified in the AMP. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Risk register item 12: Wallan East Part 1 draft status must be tracked against PSP approval, ICP approval, and amendment gazettal because each step changes land value and delivery certainty. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 12: Merri Creek corridor design must be treated as a multi-function infrastructure decision, not as leftover encumbered land. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 12: Wallan Station access must be solved with pedestrian, cycling, bus, parking, and road staging before higher-value station-area land is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 12: WRP land not designated through the PSP risks later purchase, PAO reliance, and higher public funding exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 12: Wallan population growth to 49,123 by 2045 makes local open space, transport, drainage, schools, and community facilities growth infrastructure rather than optional amenity. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 12: Council lifecycle liability must be costed because developers fund much upfront growth infrastructure while Council maintains assets over their life. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 12: Wallan East Family and Children’s Community Centre should be staged with early housing because family-service demand arrives with first residents, not at ultimate buildout. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Risk register item 12: Wallan active-open-space delivery should be checked against the three-new-reserve benchmark at the 35,000-person trigger. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk register item 12: Public-realm canopy should be designed into street cross-sections, car parks, drainage reserves, and parks to achieve the 30 percent public-land canopy expectation. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Risk register item 12: Open-space handover should avoid adding assets that worsen the parks/open-space renewal shortfall identified in the AMP. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Risk register item 13: Wallan East Part 1 draft status must be tracked against PSP approval, ICP approval, and amendment gazettal because each step changes land value and delivery certainty. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 13: Merri Creek corridor design must be treated as a multi-function infrastructure decision, not as leftover encumbered land. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 13: Wallan Station access must be solved with pedestrian, cycling, bus, parking, and road staging before higher-value station-area land is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 13: WRP land not designated through the PSP risks later purchase, PAO reliance, and higher public funding exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 13: Wallan population growth to 49,123 by 2045 makes local open space, transport, drainage, schools, and community facilities growth infrastructure rather than optional amenity. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 13: Council lifecycle liability must be costed because developers fund much upfront growth infrastructure while Council maintains assets over their life. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 13: Wallan East Family and Children’s Community Centre should be staged with early housing because family-service demand arrives with first residents, not at ultimate buildout. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Risk register item 13: Wallan active-open-space delivery should be checked against the three-new-reserve benchmark at the 35,000-person trigger. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk register item 13: Public-realm canopy should be designed into street cross-sections, car parks, drainage reserves, and parks to achieve the 30 percent public-land canopy expectation. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Risk register item 13: Open-space handover should avoid adding assets that worsen the parks/open-space renewal shortfall identified in the AMP. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Risk register item 14: Wallan East Part 1 draft status must be tracked against PSP approval, ICP approval, and amendment gazettal because each step changes land value and delivery certainty. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 14: Merri Creek corridor design must be treated as a multi-function infrastructure decision, not as leftover encumbered land. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 14: Wallan Station access must be solved with pedestrian, cycling, bus, parking, and road staging before higher-value station-area land is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 14: WRP land not designated through the PSP risks later purchase, PAO reliance, and higher public funding exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 14: Wallan population growth to 49,123 by 2045 makes local open space, transport, drainage, schools, and community facilities growth infrastructure rather than optional amenity. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 14: Council lifecycle liability must be costed because developers fund much upfront growth infrastructure while Council maintains assets over their life. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 14: Wallan East Family and Children’s Community Centre should be staged with early housing because family-service demand arrives with first residents, not at ultimate buildout. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Risk register item 14: Wallan active-open-space delivery should be checked against the three-new-reserve benchmark at the 35,000-person trigger. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk register item 14: Public-realm canopy should be designed into street cross-sections, car parks, drainage reserves, and parks to achieve the 30 percent public-land canopy expectation. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Risk register item 14: Open-space handover should avoid adding assets that worsen the parks/open-space renewal shortfall identified in the AMP. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Risk register item 15: Wallan East Part 1 draft status must be tracked against PSP approval, ICP approval, and amendment gazettal because each step changes land value and delivery certainty. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 15: Merri Creek corridor design must be treated as a multi-function infrastructure decision, not as leftover encumbered land. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 15: Wallan Station access must be solved with pedestrian, cycling, bus, parking, and road staging before higher-value station-area land is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 15: WRP land not designated through the PSP risks later purchase, PAO reliance, and higher public funding exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 15: Wallan population growth to 49,123 by 2045 makes local open space, transport, drainage, schools, and community facilities growth infrastructure rather than optional amenity. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 15: Council lifecycle liability must be costed because developers fund much upfront growth infrastructure while Council maintains assets over their life. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 15: Wallan East Family and Children’s Community Centre should be staged with early housing because family-service demand arrives with first residents, not at ultimate buildout. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Risk register item 15: Wallan active-open-space delivery should be checked against the three-new-reserve benchmark at the 35,000-person trigger. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk register item 15: Public-realm canopy should be designed into street cross-sections, car parks, drainage reserves, and parks to achieve the 30 percent public-land canopy expectation. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Risk register item 15: Open-space handover should avoid adding assets that worsen the parks/open-space renewal shortfall identified in the AMP. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Risk register item 16: Wallan East Part 1 draft status must be tracked against PSP approval, ICP approval, and amendment gazettal because each step changes land value and delivery certainty. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 16: Merri Creek corridor design must be treated as a multi-function infrastructure decision, not as leftover encumbered land. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 16: Wallan Station access must be solved with pedestrian, cycling, bus, parking, and road staging before higher-value station-area land is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 16: WRP land not designated through the PSP risks later purchase, PAO reliance, and higher public funding exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 16: Wallan population growth to 49,123 by 2045 makes local open space, transport, drainage, schools, and community facilities growth infrastructure rather than optional amenity. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 16: Council lifecycle liability must be costed because developers fund much upfront growth infrastructure while Council maintains assets over their life. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 16: Wallan East Family and Children’s Community Centre should be staged with early housing because family-service demand arrives with first residents, not at ultimate buildout. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Risk register item 16: Wallan active-open-space delivery should be checked against the three-new-reserve benchmark at the 35,000-person trigger. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk register item 16: Public-realm canopy should be designed into street cross-sections, car parks, drainage reserves, and parks to achieve the 30 percent public-land canopy expectation. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Risk register item 16: Open-space handover should avoid adding assets that worsen the parks/open-space renewal shortfall identified in the AMP. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Risk register item 17: Wallan East Part 1 draft status must be tracked against PSP approval, ICP approval, and amendment gazettal because each step changes land value and delivery certainty. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 17: Merri Creek corridor design must be treated as a multi-function infrastructure decision, not as leftover encumbered land. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 17: Wallan Station access must be solved with pedestrian, cycling, bus, parking, and road staging before higher-value station-area land is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 17: WRP land not designated through the PSP risks later purchase, PAO reliance, and higher public funding exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 17: Wallan population growth to 49,123 by 2045 makes local open space, transport, drainage, schools, and community facilities growth infrastructure rather than optional amenity. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 17: Council lifecycle liability must be costed because developers fund much upfront growth infrastructure while Council maintains assets over their life. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 17: Wallan East Family and Children’s Community Centre should be staged with early housing because family-service demand arrives with first residents, not at ultimate buildout. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Risk register item 17: Wallan active-open-space delivery should be checked against the three-new-reserve benchmark at the 35,000-person trigger. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk register item 17: Public-realm canopy should be designed into street cross-sections, car parks, drainage reserves, and parks to achieve the 30 percent public-land canopy expectation. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Risk register item 17: Open-space handover should avoid adding assets that worsen the parks/open-space renewal shortfall identified in the AMP. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Risk register item 18: Wallan East Part 1 draft status must be tracked against PSP approval, ICP approval, and amendment gazettal because each step changes land value and delivery certainty. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 18: Merri Creek corridor design must be treated as a multi-function infrastructure decision, not as leftover encumbered land. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 18: Wallan Station access must be solved with pedestrian, cycling, bus, parking, and road staging before higher-value station-area land is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 18: WRP land not designated through the PSP risks later purchase, PAO reliance, and higher public funding exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 18: Wallan population growth to 49,123 by 2045 makes local open space, transport, drainage, schools, and community facilities growth infrastructure rather than optional amenity. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 18: Council lifecycle liability must be costed because developers fund much upfront growth infrastructure while Council maintains assets over their life. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 18: Wallan East Family and Children’s Community Centre should be staged with early housing because family-service demand arrives with first residents, not at ultimate buildout. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Risk register item 18: Wallan active-open-space delivery should be checked against the three-new-reserve benchmark at the 35,000-person trigger. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk register item 18: Public-realm canopy should be designed into street cross-sections, car parks, drainage reserves, and parks to achieve the 30 percent public-land canopy expectation. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Risk register item 18: Open-space handover should avoid adding assets that worsen the parks/open-space renewal shortfall identified in the AMP. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Risk register item 19: Wallan East Part 1 draft status must be tracked against PSP approval, ICP approval, and amendment gazettal because each step changes land value and delivery certainty. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 19: Merri Creek corridor design must be treated as a multi-function infrastructure decision, not as leftover encumbered land. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 19: Wallan Station access must be solved with pedestrian, cycling, bus, parking, and road staging before higher-value station-area land is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 19: WRP land not designated through the PSP risks later purchase, PAO reliance, and higher public funding exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 19: Wallan population growth to 49,123 by 2045 makes local open space, transport, drainage, schools, and community facilities growth infrastructure rather than optional amenity. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 19: Council lifecycle liability must be costed because developers fund much upfront growth infrastructure while Council maintains assets over their life. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 19: Wallan East Family and Children’s Community Centre should be staged with early housing because family-service demand arrives with first residents, not at ultimate buildout. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Risk register item 19: Wallan active-open-space delivery should be checked against the three-new-reserve benchmark at the 35,000-person trigger. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk register item 19: Public-realm canopy should be designed into street cross-sections, car parks, drainage reserves, and parks to achieve the 30 percent public-land canopy expectation. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Risk register item 19: Open-space handover should avoid adding assets that worsen the parks/open-space renewal shortfall identified in the AMP. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Risk register item 20: Wallan East Part 1 draft status must be tracked against PSP approval, ICP approval, and amendment gazettal because each step changes land value and delivery certainty. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 20: Merri Creek corridor design must be treated as a multi-function infrastructure decision, not as leftover encumbered land. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 20: Wallan Station access must be solved with pedestrian, cycling, bus, parking, and road staging before higher-value station-area land is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 20: WRP land not designated through the PSP risks later purchase, PAO reliance, and higher public funding exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 20: Wallan population growth to 49,123 by 2045 makes local open space, transport, drainage, schools, and community facilities growth infrastructure rather than optional amenity. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 20: Council lifecycle liability must be costed because developers fund much upfront growth infrastructure while Council maintains assets over their life. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 20: Wallan East Family and Children’s Community Centre should be staged with early housing because family-service demand arrives with first residents, not at ultimate buildout. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Risk register item 20: Wallan active-open-space delivery should be checked against the three-new-reserve benchmark at the 35,000-person trigger. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk register item 20: Public-realm canopy should be designed into street cross-sections, car parks, drainage reserves, and parks to achieve the 30 percent public-land canopy expectation. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Risk register item 20: Open-space handover should avoid adding assets that worsen the parks/open-space renewal shortfall identified in the AMP. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Risk register item 21: Wallan East Part 1 draft status must be tracked against PSP approval, ICP approval, and amendment gazettal because each step changes land value and delivery certainty. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 21: Merri Creek corridor design must be treated as a multi-function infrastructure decision, not as leftover encumbered land. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 21: Wallan Station access must be solved with pedestrian, cycling, bus, parking, and road staging before higher-value station-area land is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 21: WRP land not designated through the PSP risks later purchase, PAO reliance, and higher public funding exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 21: Wallan population growth to 49,123 by 2045 makes local open space, transport, drainage, schools, and community facilities growth infrastructure rather than optional amenity. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 21: Council lifecycle liability must be costed because developers fund much upfront growth infrastructure while Council maintains assets over their life. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 21: Wallan East Family and Children’s Community Centre should be staged with early housing because family-service demand arrives with first residents, not at ultimate buildout. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Risk register item 21: Wallan active-open-space delivery should be checked against the three-new-reserve benchmark at the 35,000-person trigger. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk register item 21: Public-realm canopy should be designed into street cross-sections, car parks, drainage reserves, and parks to achieve the 30 percent public-land canopy expectation. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Risk register item 21: Open-space handover should avoid adding assets that worsen the parks/open-space renewal shortfall identified in the AMP. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Risk register item 22: Wallan East Part 1 draft status must be tracked against PSP approval, ICP approval, and amendment gazettal because each step changes land value and delivery certainty. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 22: Merri Creek corridor design must be treated as a multi-function infrastructure decision, not as leftover encumbered land. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 22: Wallan Station access must be solved with pedestrian, cycling, bus, parking, and road staging before higher-value station-area land is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 22: WRP land not designated through the PSP risks later purchase, PAO reliance, and higher public funding exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 22: Wallan population growth to 49,123 by 2045 makes local open space, transport, drainage, schools, and community facilities growth infrastructure rather than optional amenity. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 22: Council lifecycle liability must be costed because developers fund much upfront growth infrastructure while Council maintains assets over their life. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 22: Wallan East Family and Children’s Community Centre should be staged with early housing because family-service demand arrives with first residents, not at ultimate buildout. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Risk register item 22: Wallan active-open-space delivery should be checked against the three-new-reserve benchmark at the 35,000-person trigger. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk register item 22: Public-realm canopy should be designed into street cross-sections, car parks, drainage reserves, and parks to achieve the 30 percent public-land canopy expectation. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Risk register item 22: Open-space handover should avoid adding assets that worsen the parks/open-space renewal shortfall identified in the AMP. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Risk register item 23: Wallan East Part 1 draft status must be tracked against PSP approval, ICP approval, and amendment gazettal because each step changes land value and delivery certainty. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 23: Merri Creek corridor design must be treated as a multi-function infrastructure decision, not as leftover encumbered land. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 23: Wallan Station access must be solved with pedestrian, cycling, bus, parking, and road staging before higher-value station-area land is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 23: WRP land not designated through the PSP risks later purchase, PAO reliance, and higher public funding exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 23: Wallan population growth to 49,123 by 2045 makes local open space, transport, drainage, schools, and community facilities growth infrastructure rather than optional amenity. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 23: Council lifecycle liability must be costed because developers fund much upfront growth infrastructure while Council maintains assets over their life. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 23: Wallan East Family and Children’s Community Centre should be staged with early housing because family-service demand arrives with first residents, not at ultimate buildout. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Risk register item 23: Wallan active-open-space delivery should be checked against the three-new-reserve benchmark at the 35,000-person trigger. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk register item 23: Public-realm canopy should be designed into street cross-sections, car parks, drainage reserves, and parks to achieve the 30 percent public-land canopy expectation. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Risk register item 23: Open-space handover should avoid adding assets that worsen the parks/open-space renewal shortfall identified in the AMP. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Risk register item 24: Wallan East Part 1 draft status must be tracked against PSP approval, ICP approval, and amendment gazettal because each step changes land value and delivery certainty. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 24: Merri Creek corridor design must be treated as a multi-function infrastructure decision, not as leftover encumbered land. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 24: Wallan Station access must be solved with pedestrian, cycling, bus, parking, and road staging before higher-value station-area land is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 24: WRP land not designated through the PSP risks later purchase, PAO reliance, and higher public funding exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 24: Wallan population growth to 49,123 by 2045 makes local open space, transport, drainage, schools, and community facilities growth infrastructure rather than optional amenity. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 24: Council lifecycle liability must be costed because developers fund much upfront growth infrastructure while Council maintains assets over their life. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 24: Wallan East Family and Children’s Community Centre should be staged with early housing because family-service demand arrives with first residents, not at ultimate buildout. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Risk register item 24: Wallan active-open-space delivery should be checked against the three-new-reserve benchmark at the 35,000-person trigger. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk register item 24: Public-realm canopy should be designed into street cross-sections, car parks, drainage reserves, and parks to achieve the 30 percent public-land canopy expectation. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Risk register item 24: Open-space handover should avoid adding assets that worsen the parks/open-space renewal shortfall identified in the AMP. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Risk register item 25: Wallan East Part 1 draft status must be tracked against PSP approval, ICP approval, and amendment gazettal because each step changes land value and delivery certainty. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 25: Merri Creek corridor design must be treated as a multi-function infrastructure decision, not as leftover encumbered land. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 25: Wallan Station access must be solved with pedestrian, cycling, bus, parking, and road staging before higher-value station-area land is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 25: WRP land not designated through the PSP risks later purchase, PAO reliance, and higher public funding exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 25: Wallan population growth to 49,123 by 2045 makes local open space, transport, drainage, schools, and community facilities growth infrastructure rather than optional amenity. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 25: Council lifecycle liability must be costed because developers fund much upfront growth infrastructure while Council maintains assets over their life. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 25: Wallan East Family and Children’s Community Centre should be staged with early housing because family-service demand arrives with first residents, not at ultimate buildout. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Risk register item 25: Wallan active-open-space delivery should be checked against the three-new-reserve benchmark at the 35,000-person trigger. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk register item 25: Public-realm canopy should be designed into street cross-sections, car parks, drainage reserves, and parks to achieve the 30 percent public-land canopy expectation. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Risk register item 25: Open-space handover should avoid adding assets that worsen the parks/open-space renewal shortfall identified in the AMP. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Risk register item 26: Wallan East Part 1 draft status must be tracked against PSP approval, ICP approval, and amendment gazettal because each step changes land value and delivery certainty. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 26: Merri Creek corridor design must be treated as a multi-function infrastructure decision, not as leftover encumbered land. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 26: Wallan Station access must be solved with pedestrian, cycling, bus, parking, and road staging before higher-value station-area land is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 26: WRP land not designated through the PSP risks later purchase, PAO reliance, and higher public funding exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 26: Wallan population growth to 49,123 by 2045 makes local open space, transport, drainage, schools, and community facilities growth infrastructure rather than optional amenity. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 26: Council lifecycle liability must be costed because developers fund much upfront growth infrastructure while Council maintains assets over their life. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 26: Wallan East Family and Children’s Community Centre should be staged with early housing because family-service demand arrives with first residents, not at ultimate buildout. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Risk register item 26: Wallan active-open-space delivery should be checked against the three-new-reserve benchmark at the 35,000-person trigger. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk register item 26: Public-realm canopy should be designed into street cross-sections, car parks, drainage reserves, and parks to achieve the 30 percent public-land canopy expectation. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Risk register item 26: Open-space handover should avoid adding assets that worsen the parks/open-space renewal shortfall identified in the AMP. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Risk register item 27: Wallan East Part 1 draft status must be tracked against PSP approval, ICP approval, and amendment gazettal because each step changes land value and delivery certainty. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 27: Merri Creek corridor design must be treated as a multi-function infrastructure decision, not as leftover encumbered land. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 27: Wallan Station access must be solved with pedestrian, cycling, bus, parking, and road staging before higher-value station-area land is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 27: WRP land not designated through the PSP risks later purchase, PAO reliance, and higher public funding exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 27: Wallan population growth to 49,123 by 2045 makes local open space, transport, drainage, schools, and community facilities growth infrastructure rather than optional amenity. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 27: Council lifecycle liability must be costed because developers fund much upfront growth infrastructure while Council maintains assets over their life. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 27: Wallan East Family and Children’s Community Centre should be staged with early housing because family-service demand arrives with first residents, not at ultimate buildout. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Risk register item 27: Wallan active-open-space delivery should be checked against the three-new-reserve benchmark at the 35,000-person trigger. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk register item 27: Public-realm canopy should be designed into street cross-sections, car parks, drainage reserves, and parks to achieve the 30 percent public-land canopy expectation. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Risk register item 27: Open-space handover should avoid adding assets that worsen the parks/open-space renewal shortfall identified in the AMP. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Risk register item 28: Wallan East Part 1 draft status must be tracked against PSP approval, ICP approval, and amendment gazettal because each step changes land value and delivery certainty. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 28: Merri Creek corridor design must be treated as a multi-function infrastructure decision, not as leftover encumbered land. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 28: Wallan Station access must be solved with pedestrian, cycling, bus, parking, and road staging before higher-value station-area land is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 28: WRP land not designated through the PSP risks later purchase, PAO reliance, and higher public funding exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 28: Wallan population growth to 49,123 by 2045 makes local open space, transport, drainage, schools, and community facilities growth infrastructure rather than optional amenity. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 28: Council lifecycle liability must be costed because developers fund much upfront growth infrastructure while Council maintains assets over their life. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 28: Wallan East Family and Children’s Community Centre should be staged with early housing because family-service demand arrives with first residents, not at ultimate buildout. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Risk register item 28: Wallan active-open-space delivery should be checked against the three-new-reserve benchmark at the 35,000-person trigger. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk register item 28: Public-realm canopy should be designed into street cross-sections, car parks, drainage reserves, and parks to achieve the 30 percent public-land canopy expectation. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Risk register item 28: Open-space handover should avoid adding assets that worsen the parks/open-space renewal shortfall identified in the AMP. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Risk register item 29: Wallan East Part 1 draft status must be tracked against PSP approval, ICP approval, and amendment gazettal because each step changes land value and delivery certainty. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 29: Merri Creek corridor design must be treated as a multi-function infrastructure decision, not as leftover encumbered land. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 29: Wallan Station access must be solved with pedestrian, cycling, bus, parking, and road staging before higher-value station-area land is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 29: WRP land not designated through the PSP risks later purchase, PAO reliance, and higher public funding exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 29: Wallan population growth to 49,123 by 2045 makes local open space, transport, drainage, schools, and community facilities growth infrastructure rather than optional amenity. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 29: Council lifecycle liability must be costed because developers fund much upfront growth infrastructure while Council maintains assets over their life. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 29: Wallan East Family and Children’s Community Centre should be staged with early housing because family-service demand arrives with first residents, not at ultimate buildout. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Risk register item 29: Wallan active-open-space delivery should be checked against the three-new-reserve benchmark at the 35,000-person trigger. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk register item 29: Public-realm canopy should be designed into street cross-sections, car parks, drainage reserves, and parks to achieve the 30 percent public-land canopy expectation. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Risk register item 29: Open-space handover should avoid adding assets that worsen the parks/open-space renewal shortfall identified in the AMP. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Risk register item 30: Wallan East Part 1 draft status must be tracked against PSP approval, ICP approval, and amendment gazettal because each step changes land value and delivery certainty. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 30: Merri Creek corridor design must be treated as a multi-function infrastructure decision, not as leftover encumbered land. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 30: Wallan Station access must be solved with pedestrian, cycling, bus, parking, and road staging before higher-value station-area land is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 30: WRP land not designated through the PSP risks later purchase, PAO reliance, and higher public funding exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 30: Wallan population growth to 49,123 by 2045 makes local open space, transport, drainage, schools, and community facilities growth infrastructure rather than optional amenity. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 30: Council lifecycle liability must be costed because developers fund much upfront growth infrastructure while Council maintains assets over their life. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 30: Wallan East Family and Children’s Community Centre should be staged with early housing because family-service demand arrives with first residents, not at ultimate buildout. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Risk register item 30: Wallan active-open-space delivery should be checked against the three-new-reserve benchmark at the 35,000-person trigger. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk register item 30: Public-realm canopy should be designed into street cross-sections, car parks, drainage reserves, and parks to achieve the 30 percent public-land canopy expectation. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Risk register item 30: Open-space handover should avoid adding assets that worsen the parks/open-space renewal shortfall identified in the AMP. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Risk register item 31: Wallan East Part 1 draft status must be tracked against PSP approval, ICP approval, and amendment gazettal because each step changes land value and delivery certainty. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 31: Merri Creek corridor design must be treated as a multi-function infrastructure decision, not as leftover encumbered land. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 31: Wallan Station access must be solved with pedestrian, cycling, bus, parking, and road staging before higher-value station-area land is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 31: WRP land not designated through the PSP risks later purchase, PAO reliance, and higher public funding exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 31: Wallan population growth to 49,123 by 2045 makes local open space, transport, drainage, schools, and community facilities growth infrastructure rather than optional amenity. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 31: Council lifecycle liability must be costed because developers fund much upfront growth infrastructure while Council maintains assets over their life. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 31: Wallan East Family and Children’s Community Centre should be staged with early housing because family-service demand arrives with first residents, not at ultimate buildout. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Risk register item 31: Wallan active-open-space delivery should be checked against the three-new-reserve benchmark at the 35,000-person trigger. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk register item 31: Public-realm canopy should be designed into street cross-sections, car parks, drainage reserves, and parks to achieve the 30 percent public-land canopy expectation. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Risk register item 31: Open-space handover should avoid adding assets that worsen the parks/open-space renewal shortfall identified in the AMP. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Risk register item 32: Wallan East Part 1 draft status must be tracked against PSP approval, ICP approval, and amendment gazettal because each step changes land value and delivery certainty. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 32: Merri Creek corridor design must be treated as a multi-function infrastructure decision, not as leftover encumbered land. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 32: Wallan Station access must be solved with pedestrian, cycling, bus, parking, and road staging before higher-value station-area land is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 32: WRP land not designated through the PSP risks later purchase, PAO reliance, and higher public funding exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 32: Wallan population growth to 49,123 by 2045 makes local open space, transport, drainage, schools, and community facilities growth infrastructure rather than optional amenity. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 32: Council lifecycle liability must be costed because developers fund much upfront growth infrastructure while Council maintains assets over their life. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 32: Wallan East Family and Children’s Community Centre should be staged with early housing because family-service demand arrives with first residents, not at ultimate buildout. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Risk register item 32: Wallan active-open-space delivery should be checked against the three-new-reserve benchmark at the 35,000-person trigger. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk register item 32: Public-realm canopy should be designed into street cross-sections, car parks, drainage reserves, and parks to achieve the 30 percent public-land canopy expectation. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Risk register item 32: Open-space handover should avoid adding assets that worsen the parks/open-space renewal shortfall identified in the AMP. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Risk register item 33: Wallan East Part 1 draft status must be tracked against PSP approval, ICP approval, and amendment gazettal because each step changes land value and delivery certainty. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 33: Merri Creek corridor design must be treated as a multi-function infrastructure decision, not as leftover encumbered land. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 33: Wallan Station access must be solved with pedestrian, cycling, bus, parking, and road staging before higher-value station-area land is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 33: WRP land not designated through the PSP risks later purchase, PAO reliance, and higher public funding exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 33: Wallan population growth to 49,123 by 2045 makes local open space, transport, drainage, schools, and community facilities growth infrastructure rather than optional amenity. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 33: Council lifecycle liability must be costed because developers fund much upfront growth infrastructure while Council maintains assets over their life. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 33: Wallan East Family and Children’s Community Centre should be staged with early housing because family-service demand arrives with first residents, not at ultimate buildout. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Risk register item 33: Wallan active-open-space delivery should be checked against the three-new-reserve benchmark at the 35,000-person trigger. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk register item 33: Public-realm canopy should be designed into street cross-sections, car parks, drainage reserves, and parks to achieve the 30 percent public-land canopy expectation. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Risk register item 33: Open-space handover should avoid adding assets that worsen the parks/open-space renewal shortfall identified in the AMP. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Risk register item 34: Wallan East Part 1 draft status must be tracked against PSP approval, ICP approval, and amendment gazettal because each step changes land value and delivery certainty. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 34: Merri Creek corridor design must be treated as a multi-function infrastructure decision, not as leftover encumbered land. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 34: Wallan Station access must be solved with pedestrian, cycling, bus, parking, and road staging before higher-value station-area land is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 34: WRP land not designated through the PSP risks later purchase, PAO reliance, and higher public funding exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 34: Wallan population growth to 49,123 by 2045 makes local open space, transport, drainage, schools, and community facilities growth infrastructure rather than optional amenity. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 34: Council lifecycle liability must be costed because developers fund much upfront growth infrastructure while Council maintains assets over their life. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 34: Wallan East Family and Children’s Community Centre should be staged with early housing because family-service demand arrives with first residents, not at ultimate buildout. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Risk register item 34: Wallan active-open-space delivery should be checked against the three-new-reserve benchmark at the 35,000-person trigger. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk register item 34: Public-realm canopy should be designed into street cross-sections, car parks, drainage reserves, and parks to achieve the 30 percent public-land canopy expectation. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Risk register item 34: Open-space handover should avoid adding assets that worsen the parks/open-space renewal shortfall identified in the AMP. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Risk register item 35: Wallan East Part 1 draft status must be tracked against PSP approval, ICP approval, and amendment gazettal because each step changes land value and delivery certainty. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 35: Merri Creek corridor design must be treated as a multi-function infrastructure decision, not as leftover encumbered land. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 35: Wallan Station access must be solved with pedestrian, cycling, bus, parking, and road staging before higher-value station-area land is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 35: WRP land not designated through the PSP risks later purchase, PAO reliance, and higher public funding exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 35: Wallan population growth to 49,123 by 2045 makes local open space, transport, drainage, schools, and community facilities growth infrastructure rather than optional amenity. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 35: Council lifecycle liability must be costed because developers fund much upfront growth infrastructure while Council maintains assets over their life. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 35: Wallan East Family and Children’s Community Centre should be staged with early housing because family-service demand arrives with first residents, not at ultimate buildout. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Risk register item 35: Wallan active-open-space delivery should be checked against the three-new-reserve benchmark at the 35,000-person trigger. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk register item 35: Public-realm canopy should be designed into street cross-sections, car parks, drainage reserves, and parks to achieve the 30 percent public-land canopy expectation. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Risk register item 35: Open-space handover should avoid adding assets that worsen the parks/open-space renewal shortfall identified in the AMP. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)
Risk register item 36: Wallan East Part 1 draft status must be tracked against PSP approval, ICP approval, and amendment gazettal because each step changes land value and delivery certainty. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 36: Merri Creek corridor design must be treated as a multi-function infrastructure decision, not as leftover encumbered land. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 36: Wallan Station access must be solved with pedestrian, cycling, bus, parking, and road staging before higher-value station-area land is priced. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 36: WRP land not designated through the PSP risks later purchase, PAO reliance, and higher public funding exposure. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk register item 36: Wallan population growth to 49,123 by 2045 makes local open space, transport, drainage, schools, and community facilities growth infrastructure rather than optional amenity. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 36: Council lifecycle liability must be costed because developers fund much upfront growth infrastructure while Council maintains assets over their life. (Source: 10-year-asset-plan-2025-2035-2.txt)
Risk register item 36: Wallan East Family and Children’s Community Centre should be staged with early housing because family-service demand arrives with first residents, not at ultimate buildout. (Source: msc-council-and-health-plan-2025-2029-final-web.txt)
Risk register item 36: Wallan active-open-space delivery should be checked against the three-new-reserve benchmark at the 35,000-person trigger. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk register item 36: Public-realm canopy should be designed into street cross-sections, car parks, drainage reserves, and parks to achieve the 30 percent public-land canopy expectation. (Source: urban-forest-strategy-2023.txt)
Risk register item 36: Open-space handover should avoid adding assets that worsen the parks/open-space renewal shortfall identified in the AMP. (Source: parks-open-space-amp-2021-under-review.txt)

Grange Planning Brain

Explorer