title: Beveridge North West Infrastructure Contributions Plan council: mitchell state: vic category: infrastructure classification: MAJOR status: approved last_compiled: 2026-05-31 source_docs:
- Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf
- Beveridge-North-West-PSP-Infrastructure-Designs-and-Costings-Cardno-November-2021_Part-1.pdf
- Beveridge-North-West-PSP-Infrastructure-Designs-and-Costings-Cardno-November-2021_Part-5_Appendix-B_Tables.pdf
- Beveridge-North-West-PSP-ICP-VCAT-Part-A-Submission-April-2022.pdf
Beveridge North West Infrastructure Contributions Plan
The Beveridge North West Infrastructure Contributions Plan is the statutory funding mechanism for core transport, community, recreation and public purpose land infrastructure in the Beveridge North West Precinct Structure Plan area. It applies to 1,279.35 hectares, imposes contributions on 768.18 net developable hectares, and raises a total monetary component of 242.542 million through a combined residential levy of 315,734.55 per net developable hectare. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, pp.1, 4, 20)
The plan matters because the precinct has a high infrastructure burden: only 60.04 percent of the total precinct is net developable area, while 400.37 hectares is open space, waterway, drainage or landscape-value land and 124.70 hectares is credited public purpose land. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, pp.17, 28) The supplementary levy is not a discretionary funding layer; it exists because sodic and dispersive soils increase the cost of transport infrastructure beyond what the standard levy can collect. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, p.1)
Background
The ICP was prepared by the Victorian Planning Authority with Mitchell Shire Council, service authorities and other stakeholders, and it has been incorporated into the Mitchell Planning Scheme to impose infrastructure contributions for works, services, facilities and public purpose land. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, p.3) It is implemented through Schedule 3 to Clause 45.11, the Infrastructure Contributions Overlay, and is listed as an incorporated document under Clause 72.04. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, p.3)
The statutory pathway followed a longer PSP and quarry-related process. In April 2022, the VPA described draft Amendment C158mith as the amendment to incorporate the Beveridge North West PSP and rezone land, and draft Amendment C161mith as the amendment to incorporate the supplementary levy ICP. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-PSP-ICP-VCAT-Part-A-Submission-April-2022.pdf, p.11) The same submission stated that the draft amendments covered approximately 1,279.35 hectares in the Northern Growth Corridor and were intended to support approximately 16,000 dwellings and 1,800 jobs. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-PSP-ICP-VCAT-Part-A-Submission-April-2022.pdf, p.8)
The ICP has a 30-year projected life after gazettal, or until development in the ICP area is complete or the ICP is removed from the Mitchell Planning Scheme. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, p.4) The document states that it is expected to be reviewed every five years, or more frequently if required. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, p.4)
Analysis
Contribution Mechanism and Levy Burden
The monetary component has two layers: a standard levy and a supplementary levy, both calculated by multiplying net developable area by the relevant levy rate. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, p.1) For residential development, the standard levy is 256,650 per net developable hectare and raises 197.154 million across 768.18 net developable hectares. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, p.1) The supplementary levy is 59,085 per net developable hectare and raises 45.388 million across the same net developable area. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, p.1) The combined residential monetary levy is therefore 315,735 per net developable hectare in the summary table, and 315,734.55 per net developable hectare in the detailed levy table. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, pp.1, 20)
The standard levy is split between 109,088 per net developable hectare for community and recreation construction and 147,562 per net developable hectare for transport construction. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, p.20) The supplementary levy is entirely assigned to transport construction at 59,084.55 per net developable hectare. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, p.20) This means transport infrastructure accounts for 206,646.55 per net developable hectare, or approximately 65.45 percent of the total monetary levy. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, p.20)
The land component operates differently from the monetary component. The monetary component is payable on net developable area, while the land component is calculated on contribution land. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, p.4) The ICP identifies 892.88 hectares of contribution land and applies a residential land contribution percentage of 13.97 percent. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, pp.2, 17) This produces 124.70 hectares of public purpose land for equalisation purposes, consisting of 34.97 hectares of transport public purpose land and 89.73 hectares of residential community and recreation public purpose land. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, p.17)
The land equalisation mechanism is material because public purpose land is unevenly distributed across parcels. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, pp.17-19) The ICP identifies 33.57 hectares of inner public purpose land above the contribution percentage and assigns a total land credit/equalisation value of 65.659 million. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, p.17) The equalisation rate is 1.956 million per hectare. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, p.17)
The largest land credit positions sit on BN-04 and BN-13. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, pp.18-19) BN-04 has 31.35 hectares of public purpose land against a 15.00 hectare contribution requirement and receives a land credit of 30.663 million. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, p.18) BN-13 has 26.90 hectares of public purpose land against a 12.31 hectare contribution requirement and receives a land credit of 29.929 million. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, p.19) The largest land equalisation payment positions include BN-06 at 13.501 million, BN-05 at 13.361 million and BN-11 at $11.381 million. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, pp.2, 18-19)
Transport Infrastructure and Cost Drivers
The ICP funds 23 standard transport construction items and 5 supplementary transport construction items. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, pp.8-10) Standard transport items have a total cost of 145.995 million, with 112.405 million apportioned to the ICP, equal to 146,325.23 per net developable hectare. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, p.9) Supplementary transport items have a total cost of 49.638 million, with 45.388 million apportioned to the ICP, equal to 59,085 per net developable hectare. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, p.10)
The main standard transport cost items include BN-RD-03c at 15.515 million, BN-IN-05 at 9.242 million, BN-IN-04 at 8.947 million, BN-IN-03 at 8.203 million apportioned to the ICP, and BN-IN-01 at 7.481 million apportioned to the ICP. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, pp.8-9) The main supplementary transport cost items are BN-IN-06 at 14.226 million, the supplementary portion of BN-IN-07 at 10.802 million, BN-RD-02 at 8.967 million and BN-BR-03 at $8.638 million. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, p.10)
The supplementary levy is caused by site conditions rather than by an expanded project list. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, p.1) Cardno reported that the whole site is affected by sodic soils, with the western portion particularly affected. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-PSP-Infrastructure-Designs-and-Costings-Cardno-November-2021_Part-1.pdf, p.2) Cardno also identified creek-bed areas, steep-gradient areas and places where water can congregate as high-sensitivity erosion areas. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-PSP-Infrastructure-Designs-and-Costings-Cardno-November-2021_Part-1.pdf, p.3)
The mechanism is direct: sodic soils require extra construction treatments, and those treatments increase road, intersection and bridge costs. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-PSP-Infrastructure-Designs-and-Costings-Cardno-November-2021_Part-1.pdf, pp.4, 8-9) Cardno allowed for measures including a 200 millimetre capping layer under pavement, batter protection matting, erosion protection for utilities, staging inefficiency costs, lime stabilisation, geotextile matting and gypsum stabilisation. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-PSP-Infrastructure-Designs-and-Costings-Cardno-November-2021_Part-1.pdf, p.4) In the western section, Cardno also costed swale lining and rock protection near creek areas. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-PSP-Infrastructure-Designs-and-Costings-Cardno-November-2021_Part-1.pdf, p.4)
The cost uplift is visible in the comparison tables. RD-03 section 4 had a benchmark P90 cost of 10.312 million and an estimated P90 cost of 16.515 million. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-PSP-Infrastructure-Designs-and-Costings-Cardno-November-2021_Part-1.pdf, p.8) IN-06 had a benchmark P90 cost of 4.674 million and an estimated P90 cost of 10.143 million. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-PSP-Infrastructure-Designs-and-Costings-Cardno-November-2021_Part-1.pdf, p.8) IN-04 had a benchmark P90 cost of 4.674 million and an estimated P90 cost of 10.062 million. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-PSP-Infrastructure-Designs-and-Costings-Cardno-November-2021_Part-1.pdf, p.10) These comparisons show that soil treatment and earthworks are central cost drivers for the ICP. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-PSP-Infrastructure-Designs-and-Costings-Cardno-November-2021_Part-1.pdf, pp.8-10)
Community, Recreation and the Standard Levy Cap
The ICP funds five multi-purpose community centres and four sports reserve projects through the standard community and recreation levy. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, pp.11-12) The five community centres are CI-01, CI-02, CI-03, CI-04 and CI-06, each including provision for four kindergarten rooms. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, pp.11-12) The four sports reserve projects are SR-01, SR-02, SR-03 and SR-04, each including a pavilion and sports fields or hard courts. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, p.12)
The community and recreation project list has a total cost of 115.375 million, but the capped levy shown in the table is 101,299 per net developable hectare. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, p.12) The detailed levy table later identifies the community and recreation standard levy as $109,088 per net developable hectare. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, p.20) This apparent difference is likely due to indexation or table timing, but the source documents do not provide a reconciliation between the two figures. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, pp.12, 20)
The April 2022 VPA submission explains an earlier community infrastructure issue. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-PSP-ICP-VCAT-Part-A-Submission-April-2022.pdf, p.71) The VPA stated that an earlier ICP version included CI-07 for otherwise unallocated community and recreation levy funds, but a spreadsheet error had omitted open-space construction line items for SR-01 to SR-04. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-PSP-ICP-VCAT-Part-A-Submission-April-2022.pdf, p.71) The VPA stated that the error had no material impact because the community and recreation levy was capped. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-PSP-ICP-VCAT-Part-A-Submission-April-2022.pdf, p.71) Mitchell Shire Council submitted that the capped levy would leave a shortfall for community infrastructure, and the VPA stated that the Ministerial Direction did not provide a supplementary levy for community and recreation projects. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-PSP-ICP-VCAT-Part-A-Submission-April-2022.pdf, p.71)
Land Budget and Development Capacity
The precinct has a total area of 1,279.35 hectares and a total net developable area of 768.18 hectares. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, p.28) The net developable area is 60.04 percent of the total precinct. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, p.28) The land budget identifies 64.82 hectares for transport, 45.98 hectares for community and education, 321.24 hectares for uncredited open space and regional open space, and 79.13 hectares for credited open space. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, p.28)
The largest single land-budget constraint is landscape values at 195.26 hectares, representing 15.26 percent of the precinct. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, p.28) Waterway and drainage reserve land totals 125.98 hectares, representing 9.85 percent of the precinct. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, p.28) Together, these two uncredited open-space categories account for 321.24 hectares, or 25.11 percent of the precinct. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, p.28)
The parcel-specific budget shows uneven development capacity. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, p.29) BN-11 has the largest net developable area at 96.14 hectares, followed by BN-06 at 91.26 hectares, BN-01 at 77.63 hectares, BN-04 at 76.03 hectares and BN-15 at 74.00 hectares. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, p.29) Some parcels have large gross areas but sharply reduced net developable areas because of landscape, drainage or public purpose land; for example, BN-01 has a gross area of 178.38 hectares but a net developable area of 77.63 hectares. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, p.29)
Staging and Delivery Risk
The ICP assigns infrastructure staging as short term for approximately 0-7 years, medium term for approximately 7-15 years and long term for approximately 15 years and beyond. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, p.6) Early transport items include BN-RD-02 as short term and several Camerons Lane or southern access intersections as short-to-medium term. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, pp.8, 10) Many northern and internal arterial items are medium-to-long term, including BN-RD-03a, BN-RD-03b, BN-RD-03c, BN-RD-04, BN-RD-04a, BN-IN-05, BN-IN-06, BN-IN-07, BN-IN-08, BN-IN-09, BN-IN-10, BN-IN-11, BN-IN-12 and BN-IN-13. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, pp.8-10)
The collecting and development agencies can consider alternative staging where works-in-kind are agreed, transport priorities require earlier delivery, or community needs require different timing for community facilities or open space. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, p.13) Mitchell Shire Council is both the collecting agency and the development agency under the ICP. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, p.20) This means council carries both the revenue administration role and the infrastructure delivery role for the listed projects. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, p.20)
There is a practical timing risk where infrastructure needs arise before contribution revenue is collected. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, p.13) The 2022 VPA submission identified the quarry and buffer land as a particular timing issue, because submissions argued that approximately $57 million in contributions would not be collected until quarry completion and buffer release. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-PSP-ICP-VCAT-Part-A-Submission-April-2022.pdf, p.65) The VPA position was that quarry and buffer land should remain in the ICP and pay contributions when developed for residential purposes after rehabilitation. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-PSP-ICP-VCAT-Part-A-Submission-April-2022.pdf, p.65)
Contested Issues and Changes Through the Process
The ICP was contested through the broader C158mith and C161mith process. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-PSP-ICP-VCAT-Part-A-Submission-April-2022.pdf, pp.8, 65-71) Public consultation on the draft amendments began on 16 November 2021, was extended to 31 January 2022, and had received 1,065 submissions by the date of the VPA Part A submission. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-PSP-ICP-VCAT-Part-A-Submission-April-2022.pdf, p.8) The VPA noted that there was uncertainty about whether some quarry-related submissions concerned the planning scheme amendments or the called-in quarry permit application. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-PSP-ICP-VCAT-Part-A-Submission-April-2022.pdf, p.8)
Several ICP issues were raised in submissions. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-PSP-ICP-VCAT-Part-A-Submission-April-2022.pdf, pp.65-71) These included whether to excise quarry land and buffers from the Infrastructure Contributions Overlay, whether to extend the ICP timeframe from 20 to 30 years, whether to explain the standard and supplementary levy allocation, how interim non-residential uses should be treated, whether Old Sydney Road should be included, whether RD-05 should be added, whether RD-03 and RD-04 alignments should change, whether extra Camerons Lane culverts should be added, and whether additional pedestrian or bridge items should be funded. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-PSP-ICP-VCAT-Part-A-Submission-April-2022.pdf, pp.65-71)
The VPA supported adding RD-05 as a local access street to provide an underpass connection along Murray Street between Beveridge Central and Beveridge North West. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-PSP-ICP-VCAT-Part-A-Submission-April-2022.pdf, p.68) The VPA did not support including Old Sydney Road as an ICP project. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-PSP-ICP-VCAT-Part-A-Submission-April-2022.pdf, p.68) The VPA also did not support including the east-west connector between IN-07 and IN-10 because it considered that road to be developer-related works rather than an ICP-funded item. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-PSP-ICP-VCAT-Part-A-Submission-April-2022.pdf, p.69)
The final November 2024 ICP shows changes from the exhibited 2021 project list. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, pp.8-10; Source: Beveridge-North-West-PSP-ICP-VCAT-Part-A-Submission-April-2022.pdf, pp.63-64) For example, the 2022 submission described the exhibited supplementary levy rate as 69,065.13 per hectare, while the final 2024 ICP sets the supplementary transport levy at 59,084.55 per hectare. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-PSP-ICP-VCAT-Part-A-Submission-April-2022.pdf, p.12; Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, p.20) The 2022 submission identified BR-01 as a supplementary bridge item, while the final 2024 ICP says BN-BR-01 is not needed and has been replaced with culvert BN-CU-04. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-PSP-ICP-VCAT-Part-A-Submission-April-2022.pdf, p.64; Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, p.9)
Cross-Precinct Apportionment
The ICP is connected to surrounding growth-area infrastructure funding. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, pp.8-10) BN-RD-01 is apportioned 50 percent to the ICP, with Beveridge Central ICP identified as the external funding source for the balance. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, p.8) BN-IN-01 is apportioned 75 percent to the ICP, with Beveridge Central ICP identified as the external funding source for the balance. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, p.8) BN-IN-03 is apportioned 75 percent to the ICP, with Beveridge South West ICP identified as the external funding source for the balance. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, p.8) BN-IN-08 and BN-IN-09 are each apportioned 25 percent to the ICP, with Wallan South ICP identified as the external funding source. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, p.9)
The 2022 VPA submission explains the policy logic for this apportionment. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-PSP-ICP-VCAT-Part-A-Submission-April-2022.pdf, pp.63-64) It states that some items are apportioned to future Wallan South ICP, the gazetted Beveridge Central ICP and the Merrifield ICP yet to be developed. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-PSP-ICP-VCAT-Part-A-Submission-April-2022.pdf, p.63) The submission also records the C106 Panel view that allocating Camerons Lane to Beveridge North West and Hadfield Road to Wallan South was pragmatic and consistent with VPA practice in the growth corridor. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-PSP-ICP-VCAT-Part-A-Submission-April-2022.pdf, p.63)
Current Status
The November 2024 ICP states that it has been incorporated into the Mitchell Planning Scheme and is implemented through Schedule 3 to Clause 45.11. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, p.3) The status of this page is therefore treated as approved for wiki purposes. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, p.3) The ICP will remain active until development in the ICP area is complete, projected to be 30 years after gazettal, or until the ICP is removed from the Mitchell Planning Scheme. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, p.4)
Dependencies
- Blocks: Urban development in the ICP area requires payment of the monetary component and provision or equalisation of public purpose land where the Infrastructure Contributions Overlay applies. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, pp.3-4, 20)
- Blocked by: Delivery can be constrained by the timing of contribution receipts, works-in-kind agreements, council delivery capacity and delayed residential conversion of quarry-affected land. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, p.13; Source: Beveridge-North-West-PSP-ICP-VCAT-Part-A-Submission-April-2022.pdf, p.65)
- Informed by: The ICP was informed by the PSP, Cardno infrastructure designs and costings, the Ministerial Direction on ICPs, VPA benchmark cost estimates and sodic soils evidence. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, pp.3-4; Source: Beveridge-North-West-PSP-ICP-VCAT-Part-A-Submission-April-2022.pdf, p.63)
- Implements: The ICP implements the infrastructure and public purpose land funding component of the Beveridge North West PSP. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, p.3)
- Conflicts with: The main identified tension is between time-limited quarry operation and the timing of ICP contribution collection for land ultimately planned for residential development. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-PSP-ICP-VCAT-Part-A-Submission-April-2022.pdf, pp.65-66)
Cross-Jurisdictional Links
The ICP has direct relationships with adjacent or nearby ICP areas because some transport items are apportioned beyond Beveridge North West. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, pp.8-10) Beveridge Central ICP is identified as an apportionment source for BN-RD-01 and BN-IN-01. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, p.8) Beveridge South West ICP is identified as an apportionment source for BN-IN-03. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, p.8) Wallan South ICP is identified as an apportionment source for BN-IN-08 and BN-IN-09. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, p.9)
The Wallan South relationship is particularly important because the 2022 VPA submission records debate about Hadfield Road, Hanna Swamp or Burrung Buluk, and the apportionment of northern boundary intersections. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-PSP-ICP-VCAT-Part-A-Submission-April-2022.pdf, pp.63, 70) The VPA maintained that IN-08 and IN-09 should remain apportioned 50 percent between Beveridge North West and future Wallan South despite possible alignment changes. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-PSP-ICP-VCAT-Part-A-Submission-April-2022.pdf, p.70)
Gaps in This Analysis
The manifest includes the final ICP, the Cardno costings report, the Cardno appendix tables and the 2022 VPA Part A submission, but it does not include the final Beveridge North West PSP, the final C158mith/C161mith approval documentation, the C106 Panel report, the Advisory Committee report, the Jacobs sodic soils assessment, the transport modelling report or the full set of public submissions. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, p.3; Source: Beveridge-North-West-PSP-ICP-VCAT-Part-A-Submission-April-2022.pdf, pp.19, 63) This limits analysis of final dwelling yield, final road hierarchy, final quarry controls, detailed submission weighting and the technical evidence behind the final supplementary levy. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-PSP-ICP-VCAT-Part-A-Submission-April-2022.pdf, pp.8, 63-71)
The Cardno appendix tables source appears to contain concept design drawings and includes a disclaimer that the geometric design is concept-only and not for construction. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-PSP-Infrastructure-Designs-and-Costings-Cardno-November-2021_Part-5_Appendix-B_Tables.pdf) This means the appendix supports understanding of costing assumptions but should not be treated as final construction design. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-PSP-Infrastructure-Designs-and-Costings-Cardno-November-2021_Part-5_Appendix-B_Tables.pdf)
There is also an internal numeric issue that should be checked against the final PDF tables. Table 8 lists total inner public purpose land as 129.05 hectares, while Table 9 lists total public purpose land for contribution-percentage purposes as 124.70 hectares. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, pp.16-17) The likely explanation is that some listed land, including CI-05 or other land categories, is not credited in the same way as contribution land, but the extracted source does not provide a clear reconciliation. (Source: Beveridge-North-West-Infrastructure-Contributions-Plan-November-2024.pdf, pp.12, 16-17)
Resolved-Versus-Residual Gap Rule
The presence of a PSP or ICP page means the instrument is no longer treated as wholly missing. Residual gaps are narrower and must be named precisely: final levy tables, apportionment schedules, agency referral conditions, construction timing, land equalisation evidence, cost escalation and post-approval delivery monitoring. This page must not describe Beveridge North West ICP or Donnybrook-Woodstock ICP as absent when sibling pages now exist in the wiki.