Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan

Mitchell Shire Beveridge Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan Wallan South PSP Wallan Wallan Regional Park Merri Creek Bald Hill North Growth Corridor Development Contributions Plan

Analytical Position

Lockerbie is best understood as an approved northern-growth-area town-centre and open-space precinct whose development feasibility depends on three linked systems: the PSP land-use framework, the DCP funding pipeline, and the timing of developer-delivered works-in-kind. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)

The extracted corpus does not contain the core Lockerbie PSP document or the core Lockerbie DCP document as standalone files, so this page triangulates Lockerbie from council infrastructure plans, regional open-space feasibility work, and sports-field planning. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

The strongest quantified PSP fact in the available corpus is the public-open-space contribution: Lockerbie requires public open space equal to 8.33% of Net Developable Area, split into 6.30% active open space and 2.03% passive open space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)

The strongest quantified spatial fact in the available corpus is the active-open-space allocation: Lockerbie allocates 43.5 hectares of active open space, including three designated active reserves of about 9 hectares and a 15 hectare regional sports precinct. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)

The strongest quantified delivery fact in the available corpus is the DCP community-facility pipeline: Council budgets $249,000 for Lockerbie DCP Community Centre CI02i planning in 2025-2026,$ 1.913 million for Lockerbie DCP Community Centre CI02ii design in 2026-2027, $10.247 million for Lockerbie DCP Community Facility CI02iii construction year 1 in 2027-2028, and$ 10.247 million for Lockerbie DCP Community Centre CI02iv construction year 2 in 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)

The strongest quantified active-open-space delivery fact in the available corpus is the AR01 sequence: Council budgets $151,000 for Lockerbie Active Open Space AR01i planning in 2027-2028 and$ 1.081 million for Lockerbie Active Open Space AR01ii design in 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)

Corpus Status

Core Lockerbie PSP standalone document: not present in the extracted Mitchell filename matches requested for this task; implication: direct confirmation of PSP area, dwelling yield, town-centre floor space, road hierarchy, and amendment controls remains missing. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Core Lockerbie DCP standalone document: not present in the extracted Mitchell filename matches requested for this task; implication: direct confirmation of charge areas, indexed levies, apportionment, and project IDs remains missing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Sports-field feasibility study: present as a Mitchell source and explicitly discusses Lockerbie PSP open-space quantities; implication: active-open-space hectares, reserve functions, and developer-contribution proportions can be used. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Budget 2025-2026: present as a Mitchell source and explicitly discusses development-contribution mechanics and capital projects; implication: cash-flow risk, DCP project timing, and funding-source constraints can be used. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Financial Plan 2025-2026 to 2034-2035: present as a Mitchell source and explicitly lists Lockerbie and Lockerbie North DCP projects; implication: multi-year staging, reserve funding, grants, and WIK exposure can be used. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Wallan Regional Park feasibility report: present as a Mitchell source and explicitly references Lockerbie PSP dated May 2012; implication: regional-park, Merri Creek, and PSP-status context can be used. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Baseline Facts

Lockerbie is listed among approved Precinct Structure Plans in the Wallan Regional Park feasibility study. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Lockerbie North is also listed among approved Precinct Structure Plans in the same regional-park planning context. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Beveridge Central is listed as an approved Precinct Structure Plan beside Lockerbie and Lockerbie North. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Beveridge North West, Wallan South, and Wallan East part 1 were identified as precincts undergoing Precinct Structure Planning in the regional-park study context. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Wallan East part 2, Merrifield North, Beveridge South West, Northern Freight, and Beveridge North East were identified as precincts yet to undergo Precinct Structure Planning. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
The Urban Growth Zone manages the transition of non-urban land into urban land in accordance with a PSP. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
The Urban Growth Zone provides for use and development generally in accordance with a PSP. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
The Urban Growth Zone contains urban use and development to areas identified for urban development in a PSP. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
The Urban Growth Zone continues non-urban use until urban development in accordance with a PSP occurs. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
The Urban Growth Zone seeks to prevent use or development before a PSP is applied where that would prejudice future urban development. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Lockerbie PSP is dated May 2012 in the regional-park policy table. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Lockerbie North PSP is dated March 2012 in the regional-park policy table. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
The regional-park policy table describes Lockerbie PSP as guiding use and development where a planning permit is required under the Urban Growth Zone or another zone that references the structure plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
The same table states that a regional park will be provided where the east-west Main Street and Merri Creek meet. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
The same table states that the regional park will provide a green nodal point. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
The same table states that the regional park will act as the main gateway between Merri Creek and the town-centre core. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
The same table states that the regional park will provide opportunities for picnics, outdoor group recreation, large outdoor community celebrations, and festivals. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Bald Hill is within the Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan area. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Mount Fraser is outside the Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
A proportion of Mount Fraser is protected by a Heritage Overlay. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
The Melbourne North Growth Corridor Plan recommended retention of an inter-urban break between the northern edge of the North Growth Corridor and Wallan. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Other investigations recommended establishment of a regional park in this vicinity to protect areas of environmental significance. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
A southern-growth-area regional park could potentially encompass Bald Hill, Mount Fraser, Spring Hill, Green Hill, and Hernes Swamp. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Lockerbie and Lockerbie North were the two approved PSPs affecting parts of Mitchell Shire identified by the sports-field feasibility study. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Beveridge Central and Beveridge North West were identified as PSPs in progress by the sports-field feasibility study. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Completed PSPs impacting Mitchell Shire identified future community-infrastructure requirements and guided the sports-field feasibility study. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie PSP allocates 43.5 hectares of active open space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie PSP includes three designated active reserves of approximately 9 hectares. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie PSP includes a regional sports precinct of 15 hectares. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
The three Lockerbie active reserves are designed for Australian Rules football, cricket, tennis, soccer, and associated amenities. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie PSP public-open-space contribution is 8.33% of Net Developable Area. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie PSP active-open-space contribution is 6.30% of Net Developable Area. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie PSP passive-open-space contribution is 2.03% of Net Developable Area. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie North public-open-space contribution is 9.15% of Net Developable Area. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie North active-open-space contribution is 5.9% of Net Developable Area. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie North passive-open-space contribution is 3.24% of Net Developable Area. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie North PSP includes 17.5 hectares of active playing space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie North includes one 8 hectare reserve. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
The Lockerbie North 8 hectare reserve includes two full-size Australian Rules football/cricket ovals, cricket nets, and a playground. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
The Lockerbie North 8 hectare reserve is to be located with an indoor recreation facility and a state primary/secondary school. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie North includes a separate 9.5 hectare southern reserve. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
The 9.5 hectare Lockerbie North reserve includes two full-size Australian Rules football/cricket ovals or three full-size soccer fields. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
The 9.5 hectare Lockerbie North reserve includes cricket nets, six tennis courts, two netball courts, and a playground. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
The 9.5 hectare Lockerbie North reserve will be co-located with a state primary school and a potential non-government school. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Donnybrook PSP includes a small area of Mitchell Shire and will join future Lockerbie and Lockerbie North developments. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
When Donnybrook, Lockerbie, and Lockerbie North are fully developed, residents are expected to share facilities and services across municipal boundaries. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
The existing railway line is identified as a physical barrier that will need to be resolved. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Mitchell Shire was described in the 2025-2026 Budget as one of Victoria’s fastest-growing outer-metropolitan municipalities. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Mitchell Shire had a current population greater than 64,000 in the 2025-2026 Budget context. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Mitchell Shire expected more than 221,000 residents by 2046. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Mitchell Shire expected continued growth beyond 2046 toward 250,000 residents. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
The Budget says most growth is anticipated around Beveridge, Wallan, Kilmore, and Seymour. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
The Budget uses known development-contribution projections to inform capital-works planning and delivery scheduling. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
The Budget says development contributions are collected as development proceeds. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
The Budget identifies cash-flow challenges because contributions are collected as development proceeds. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
The Budget identifies borrowings, partnerships, works-in-kind processes, and grant advocacy as mitigation measures for development-contribution cash-flow challenges. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
The Budget says development contributions rarely provide sufficient funding for the infrastructure identified. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
The Budget says delays between contribution collection and infrastructure delivery can exacerbate the funding gap. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
The Budget says development contributions and infrastructure funding depend on market conditions and development timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
The Budget forecasts 2025-2026 population growth of 7.34%. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
The Budget forecasts 2026-2027 population growth of 7.47%. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
The Budget forecasts 2027-2028 population growth of 7.16%. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
The Budget forecasts 2028-2029 population growth of 7.12%. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
The Budget forecasts developer contributions of $27.056 million in 2025-2026. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
The Budget forecasts developer contributions of $27.524 million in 2026-2027. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
The Budget forecasts developer contributions of $30.047 million in 2027-2028. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
The Budget forecasts developer contributions of $19.367 million in 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
The Budget forecasts non-monetary contributions of $60.859 million in 2025-2026. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
The Budget forecasts non-monetary contributions of $123.668 million in 2026-2027. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
The Budget forecasts non-monetary contributions of $59.247 million in 2027-2028. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
The Budget forecasts non-monetary contributions of $68.419 million in 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
The Financial Plan forecasts developer contributions of $27.056 million in 2025-2026. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
The Financial Plan forecasts developer contributions of $21.775 million in 2034-2035. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
The Financial Plan forecasts non-monetary contributions of $60.859 million in 2025-2026. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
The Financial Plan forecasts non-monetary contributions of $42.135 million in 2034-2035. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
The Financial Plan says developer contributions often require Council to outlay funds before receiving developer contributions. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
The Financial Plan says developer contributions are transferred to restricted reserves until used for specific capital-works purposes. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
The Financial Plan forecasts $28.00 million of non-monetary asset handovers in 2025-2026. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
The Financial Plan forecasts non-monetary asset handovers increasing by $2.00 million each year for six subsequent financial years. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
The Financial Plan forecasts those asset handovers reaching $40.00 million by 2031-2032. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
The Financial Plan forecasts works-in-kind non-monetary contributions of $32.86 million in 2025-2026. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
The Financial Plan attributes the 2026-2027 WIK spike to $93.66 million of anticipated developer-delivered WIK, predominantly in Beveridge Central, Beveridge North West, Kilmore South East, Lockerbie, and Lockerbie North. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
The Budget funds a Bald Hill to Merri Creek Landscape Masterplan as a key initiative. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
The Bald Hill to Merri Creek Landscape Masterplan focuses on pathways linking Bald Hill to Merri Creek. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
The Bald Hill to Merri Creek Landscape Masterplan focuses on connecting people to unique landscape setting and cultural historical importance. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
The Beveridge Central Active Open Space Master Plan says the Beveridge Central PSP, Beveridge Township Development Plan, and Lockerbie North PSP most influence locally accessible sporting facilities for Beveridge in the medium term. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
The Beveridge Central Active Open Space Master Plan identifies the Lockerbie North northern active open space as 8.0 hectares. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
The Beveridge Central Active Open Space Master Plan identifies the Lockerbie North southern active open space as 9.5 hectares. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
The Beveridge Central Active Open Space Master Plan says planned Lockerbie North active open spaces will partially meet demand for cricket ovals. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
The Beveridge Central Active Open Space Master Plan says tennis will be catered for through new Lockerbie North active-open-space facilities. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

Mechanism Map

Land-use permission: Urban Growth Zone controls defer urban development until the PSP logic is in place; this prevents premature uses that could block roads, town-centre land, open-space corridors, or utility alignments. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Open-space extraction: The 8.33% NDA public-open-space requirement converts developable land into active and passive public assets; this reduces saleable area but creates the social infrastructure needed for a dense growth-area population. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Active-sport catchment: The 43.5 hectare active-open-space allocation creates a sport network rather than a single reserve; three local active reserves and a 15 hectare regional sports precinct distribute everyday sport and higher-order events. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
DCP cash flow: The DCP pipeline depends on contributions that are collected as development proceeds, so early infrastructure can require Council borrowing, reserve use, grants, or works-in-kind before all liable development has paid in. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Works in kind: Developer-delivered WIK substitutes physical delivery for monetary collection; the 2026-2027 $93.66 million WIK spike shows why timing and developer capacity matter as much as the nominal DCP project list. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Regional-park gateway: The Merri Creek/Main Street regional park operates as both ecological edge and town-centre threshold; its mechanism is place-making through a green node rather than only land reservation. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Landscape identity: Bald Hill gives Lockerbie a landscape anchor inside the PSP area, so development form must preserve view, access, and cultural-historical interpretation rather than treating the hill as residual open space. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Cross-boundary service sharing: Donnybrook, Lockerbie, and Lockerbie North residents are expected to share facilities across councils, so railway crossings and municipal service agreements become practical determinants of amenity. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Population pressure: Mitchell growth from more than 64,000 residents toward more than 221,000 by 2046 means infrastructure under-delivery compounds annually; a one-year delay occurs against a 7% annual growth assumption in the budget period. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Reserve maintenance burden: Non-monetary handovers such as roads, drainage, and open space transfer assets to Council for ongoing maintenance; the capital asset may be delivered by development, but the lifecycle cost moves to the municipal budget. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)

Staging Sequence

2012-03: Lockerbie North PSP dated March 2012 in the regional-park policy table. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
2012-05: Lockerbie PSP dated May 2012 in the regional-park policy table. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
2013-10: Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies Bald Hill within the Lockerbie PSP area and points to regional-park potential in the southern growth area. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
2014-05: Sports Field Feasibility Study uses completed Lockerbie and Lockerbie North PSPs to guide future sport infrastructure planning. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
2022: Wallan Wallan Regional Park feasibility work reads Lockerbie as an approved PSP and identifies the Merri Creek/Main Street regional-park gateway role. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
2025-2026: Council budgets $249,000 for Lockerbie DCP Community Centre CI02i planning. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
2026-2027: Council plans $1.913 million for Lockerbie DCP Community Centre CI02ii design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
2026-2027: Council expects a $93.66 million WIK spike predominantly across Beveridge Central, Beveridge North West, Kilmore South East, Lockerbie, and Lockerbie North. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
2027-2028: Council plans $10.247 million for Lockerbie DCP Community Facility CI02iii construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
2027-2028: Council plans $151,000 for Lockerbie Active Open Space AR01i planning. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
2028-2029: Council plans $10.247 million for Lockerbie DCP Community Centre CI02iv construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
2028-2029: Council plans $1.081 million for Lockerbie Active Open Space AR01ii design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)

Development Feasibility Implications

Feasibility is not only a land-value question; it is a timing question because community-centre construction is staged over at least 2025-2026 to 2028-2029 in the available capital program. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
The open-space contribution of 8.33% of NDA is a direct land take from developable land, so gross-to-net yield assumptions must explicitly include 6.30% active and 2.03% passive open space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
The 43.5 hectare active-open-space allocation is a large land and embellishment obligation, and its feasibility depends on DCP funding, reserve delivery timing, and Council capacity to maintain delivered assets. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
The 15 hectare regional sports precinct creates higher-order amenity but also concentrates capital cost, car-parking demand, traffic generation, lighting, irrigation, and pavilion obligations. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
The Merri Creek/Main Street regional park can increase development value near the town-centre edge, but it also imposes design obligations around floodplain, habitat, access, and large-event management that are not costless. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Bald Hill is a differentiator for place value, but the Budget-funded Bald Hill to Merri Creek pathway masterplan implies that access and interpretation still need design work. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
The expected sharing of Donnybrook, Lockerbie, and Lockerbie North facilities raises a feasibility dependency on railway-barrier resolution; a facility may be close in straight-line distance but functionally remote if crossings are poor. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Council warns that development contributions rarely provide sufficient funding for identified infrastructure, so developer feasibility cannot assume the DCP charge fully solves delivery risk. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Council warns that contribution timing depends on market conditions and development timing, so slower sales can delay infrastructure and faster sales can bring forward service-demand pressure. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Works-in-kind can unlock earlier delivery where a capable developer controls the relevant land, but WIK also shifts sequencing risk to negotiated agreements and developer balance sheets. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)

Contested And Unresolved Issues

Missing PSP evidence: The available corpus confirms Lockerbie PSP exists and is approved, but the core PSP document is absent, leaving dwelling yield, employment land, street hierarchy, schools, utilities, biodiversity offsets, and permit conditions unverified. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Missing DCP evidence: The available corpus lists DCP projects but not the full DCP schedule, so charge areas, indexed costs, apportionment shares, collection triggers, and project land values remain unverified. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Open-space sufficiency: The sports-field source records 8.33% NDA open-space contribution for Lockerbie and 43.5 hectares active open space, but the corpus does not provide current population yield to test hectares per 1,000 residents. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Regional-park interface: The regional-park source identifies a Merri Creek/Main Street green node, but the corpus does not include detailed flood, ecology, land ownership, or embellishment costing for that specific node. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Railway barrier: The sports-field source states the railway barrier must be resolved for shared services, but the corpus does not include a funded crossing project for Lockerbie. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
DCP funding gap: The Budget states development contributions rarely fully fund identified infrastructure, but the corpus does not quantify the Lockerbie-specific residual funding gap. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
WIK timing: The Financial Plan forecasts a 2026-2027 WIK spike across several precincts including Lockerbie, but it does not allocate the $93.66 million by individual Lockerbie project in the extracted text. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Landscape protection: Bald Hill is inside the Lockerbie PSP area, but the corpus does not provide the exact overlay controls, ownership pattern, or access easement structure. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)

Infrastructure Ledger

Lockerbie DCP Community Centre CI02i planning: cost $249,000; timing 2025-2026; asset type new asset; funding source reserves$ 249,000. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Lockerbie DCP Community Centre CI02ii design: cost $1.913 million; timing 2026-2027; asset type new asset; funding source confirmed grants/contributions$ 1.564 million and reserves $349,000. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Lockerbie DCP Community Facility CI02iii construction year 1: cost $10.247 million; timing 2027-2028; asset type new asset; funding source confirmed grants/contributions$ 7.735 million and reserves $2.512 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Lockerbie DCP Community Centre CI02iv construction year 2: cost $10.247 million; timing 2028-2029; asset type new asset; funding source confirmed grants/contributions$ 7.735 million and reserves $2.512 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Lockerbie Active Open Space AR01i planning: cost $151,000; timing 2027-2028; asset type new asset; funding source reserves$ 151,000. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Lockerbie Active Open Space AR01ii design: cost $1.081 million; timing 2028-2029; asset type new asset; funding source reserves$ 1.081 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Lockerbie DCP Sports Pavilion AR03i design and construction: cost $1.550 million; timing later financial-plan year in extracted 10-year program; asset type new asset; funding source reserves$ 1.550 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Lockerbie DCP Sports Pavilion AR02i design and construction: cost $286,000; timing later financial-plan year in extracted 10-year program; asset type new asset; funding source reserves$ 286,000. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)

Analytical Ledger

Ledger 001: Open-space land take

Evidence: Lockerbie requires 8.33% of NDA for public open space, split 6.30% active and 2.03% passive. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is a gross-to-net conversion: land that could otherwise carry lots or roads is reserved for public use. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is lower saleable yield but higher amenity and statutory compliance. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 002: Active-sport scale

Evidence: Lockerbie allocates 43.5 hectares of active open space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is precinct-wide sport distribution across local active reserves and a regional sports precinct. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is a large embellishment and maintenance task that must be staged with population. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 003: Regional sports precinct

Evidence: Lockerbie includes a 15 hectare regional sports precinct. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is higher-order provision serving beyond a walkable neighbourhood catchment. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is traffic, lighting, pavilion, irrigation, and car-parking pressure near a concentrated destination. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 004: Local active reserves

Evidence: Lockerbie includes three designated active reserves of approximately 9 hectares. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is local access to football, cricket, tennis, soccer, and associated amenities. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that subdivision staging must protect reserve parcels before fragmented ownership makes assembly difficult. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 005: Merri Creek gateway

Evidence: Lockerbie PSP is described as providing a regional park where Main Street and Merri Creek meet. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is a green nodal point joining town-centre movement with creek open space. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that retail-core value depends partly on creek-edge public-realm quality. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 006: Bald Hill identity

Evidence: Bald Hill is within the Lockerbie PSP area. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is landscape identity: the volcanic cone anchors views, trails, and cultural-historical interpretation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that hill access and visual protection become value-creating constraints rather than leftover land issues. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 007: DCP planning step

Evidence: Council budgets $249,000 for Lockerbie DCP Community Centre CI02i planning in 2025-2026. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is staged project definition before design and construction funding. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that community-centre delivery is not immediate even where the PSP is approved. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 008: DCP design step

Evidence: Council plans $1.913 million for Lockerbie DCP Community Centre CI02ii design in 2026-2027. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is a second-stage commitment that moves from concept into design documentation. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that delivery depends on retaining grant/contribution and reserve settings through budget cycles. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 009: DCP construction step one

Evidence: Council plans $10.247 million for Lockerbie DCP Community Facility CI02iii construction year 1 in 2027-2028. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is capital delivery after planning and design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that residents arriving before this year may face a service lag. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 010: DCP construction step two

Evidence: Council plans $10.247 million for Lockerbie DCP Community Centre CI02iv construction year 2 in 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is multi-year construction rather than a single-year asset purchase. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is exposure to escalation, grant timing, and reserve drawdown across more than one budget. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 011: Active-open-space planning

Evidence: Council plans $151,000 for Lockerbie Active Open Space AR01i planning in 2027-2028. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is early reserve project scoping before design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that the 43.5 hectare sport network has a staged delivery path, not a single trigger. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 012: Active-open-space design

Evidence: Council plans $1.081 million for Lockerbie Active Open Space AR01ii design in 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is design expenditure that precedes construction and embellishment. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that reserve usability depends on later capital works not shown for AR01 construction in the four-year budget extract. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 013: Developer-contribution timing

Evidence: Council says development contributions are collected as development proceeds. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is market-dependent cash inflow tied to subdivision and development activity. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that infrastructure can be underfunded when lots sell slower than service demand arrives. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 014: Funding gap

Evidence: Council says development contributions rarely provide sufficient funding for identified infrastructure. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is mismatch between indexed project costs, contribution rates, timing, and scope creep. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that grants, borrowings, reserves, or scope changes may be needed even when a DCP exists. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 015: Works in kind

Evidence: Council forecasts a $93.66 million WIK spike in 2026-2027 across several precincts including Lockerbie. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is developers delivering infrastructure instead of paying equivalent cash contributions. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that developer capability and agreement timing become delivery risks. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 016: Asset handover

Evidence: The Financial Plan treats roads, drainage, and open space handed to Council as non-monetary contributions. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is transfer of completed assets from developers to Council after permit-conditioned delivery. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is a lifecycle maintenance burden after initial capital delivery. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 017: Population pressure

Evidence: Mitchell expected more than 221,000 residents by 2046 from more than 64,000 in the budget context. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is rapid household growth in southern and central townships including Beveridge and Wallan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that delays compound against a fast-growing service base. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 018: Railway barrier

Evidence: The sports-field source says the existing railway line is a physical barrier that must be resolved for shared facilities. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is severance: straight-line proximity does not equal usable access. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that cross-corridor permeability can determine whether duplicated infrastructure is needed. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 019: Regional-park acquisition risk

Evidence: The regional-park study warns that PSPs progressing without appropriate public-open-space designation can require land purchase. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is loss of acquisition leverage once land is not designated or transferred through subdivision. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is higher public acquisition cost and weaker open-space continuity. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 020: Open-space expectations

Evidence: The Open Space Strategy says new southern residential areas will have demand for more public open space closer to home because private open space will be limited. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is higher density and smaller private yards shifting recreation demand into public reserves. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that passive-open-space quality matters even where active-sport hectares are large. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 021: Open-space land take

Evidence: Lockerbie requires 8.33% of NDA for public open space, split 6.30% active and 2.03% passive. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is a gross-to-net conversion: land that could otherwise carry lots or roads is reserved for public use. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is lower saleable yield but higher amenity and statutory compliance. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 022: Active-sport scale

Evidence: Lockerbie allocates 43.5 hectares of active open space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is precinct-wide sport distribution across local active reserves and a regional sports precinct. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is a large embellishment and maintenance task that must be staged with population. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 023: Regional sports precinct

Evidence: Lockerbie includes a 15 hectare regional sports precinct. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is higher-order provision serving beyond a walkable neighbourhood catchment. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is traffic, lighting, pavilion, irrigation, and car-parking pressure near a concentrated destination. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 024: Local active reserves

Evidence: Lockerbie includes three designated active reserves of approximately 9 hectares. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is local access to football, cricket, tennis, soccer, and associated amenities. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that subdivision staging must protect reserve parcels before fragmented ownership makes assembly difficult. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 025: Merri Creek gateway

Evidence: Lockerbie PSP is described as providing a regional park where Main Street and Merri Creek meet. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is a green nodal point joining town-centre movement with creek open space. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that retail-core value depends partly on creek-edge public-realm quality. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 026: Bald Hill identity

Evidence: Bald Hill is within the Lockerbie PSP area. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is landscape identity: the volcanic cone anchors views, trails, and cultural-historical interpretation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that hill access and visual protection become value-creating constraints rather than leftover land issues. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 027: DCP planning step

Evidence: Council budgets $249,000 for Lockerbie DCP Community Centre CI02i planning in 2025-2026. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is staged project definition before design and construction funding. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that community-centre delivery is not immediate even where the PSP is approved. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 028: DCP design step

Evidence: Council plans $1.913 million for Lockerbie DCP Community Centre CI02ii design in 2026-2027. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is a second-stage commitment that moves from concept into design documentation. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that delivery depends on retaining grant/contribution and reserve settings through budget cycles. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 029: DCP construction step one

Evidence: Council plans $10.247 million for Lockerbie DCP Community Facility CI02iii construction year 1 in 2027-2028. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is capital delivery after planning and design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that residents arriving before this year may face a service lag. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 030: DCP construction step two

Evidence: Council plans $10.247 million for Lockerbie DCP Community Centre CI02iv construction year 2 in 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is multi-year construction rather than a single-year asset purchase. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is exposure to escalation, grant timing, and reserve drawdown across more than one budget. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 031: Active-open-space planning

Evidence: Council plans $151,000 for Lockerbie Active Open Space AR01i planning in 2027-2028. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is early reserve project scoping before design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that the 43.5 hectare sport network has a staged delivery path, not a single trigger. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 032: Active-open-space design

Evidence: Council plans $1.081 million for Lockerbie Active Open Space AR01ii design in 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is design expenditure that precedes construction and embellishment. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that reserve usability depends on later capital works not shown for AR01 construction in the four-year budget extract. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 033: Developer-contribution timing

Evidence: Council says development contributions are collected as development proceeds. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is market-dependent cash inflow tied to subdivision and development activity. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that infrastructure can be underfunded when lots sell slower than service demand arrives. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 034: Funding gap

Evidence: Council says development contributions rarely provide sufficient funding for identified infrastructure. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is mismatch between indexed project costs, contribution rates, timing, and scope creep. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that grants, borrowings, reserves, or scope changes may be needed even when a DCP exists. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 035: Works in kind

Evidence: Council forecasts a $93.66 million WIK spike in 2026-2027 across several precincts including Lockerbie. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is developers delivering infrastructure instead of paying equivalent cash contributions. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that developer capability and agreement timing become delivery risks. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 036: Asset handover

Evidence: The Financial Plan treats roads, drainage, and open space handed to Council as non-monetary contributions. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is transfer of completed assets from developers to Council after permit-conditioned delivery. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is a lifecycle maintenance burden after initial capital delivery. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 037: Population pressure

Evidence: Mitchell expected more than 221,000 residents by 2046 from more than 64,000 in the budget context. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is rapid household growth in southern and central townships including Beveridge and Wallan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that delays compound against a fast-growing service base. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 038: Railway barrier

Evidence: The sports-field source says the existing railway line is a physical barrier that must be resolved for shared facilities. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is severance: straight-line proximity does not equal usable access. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that cross-corridor permeability can determine whether duplicated infrastructure is needed. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 039: Regional-park acquisition risk

Evidence: The regional-park study warns that PSPs progressing without appropriate public-open-space designation can require land purchase. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is loss of acquisition leverage once land is not designated or transferred through subdivision. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is higher public acquisition cost and weaker open-space continuity. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 040: Open-space expectations

Evidence: The Open Space Strategy says new southern residential areas will have demand for more public open space closer to home because private open space will be limited. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is higher density and smaller private yards shifting recreation demand into public reserves. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that passive-open-space quality matters even where active-sport hectares are large. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 041: Open-space land take

Evidence: Lockerbie requires 8.33% of NDA for public open space, split 6.30% active and 2.03% passive. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is a gross-to-net conversion: land that could otherwise carry lots or roads is reserved for public use. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is lower saleable yield but higher amenity and statutory compliance. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 042: Active-sport scale

Evidence: Lockerbie allocates 43.5 hectares of active open space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is precinct-wide sport distribution across local active reserves and a regional sports precinct. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is a large embellishment and maintenance task that must be staged with population. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 043: Regional sports precinct

Evidence: Lockerbie includes a 15 hectare regional sports precinct. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is higher-order provision serving beyond a walkable neighbourhood catchment. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is traffic, lighting, pavilion, irrigation, and car-parking pressure near a concentrated destination. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 044: Local active reserves

Evidence: Lockerbie includes three designated active reserves of approximately 9 hectares. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is local access to football, cricket, tennis, soccer, and associated amenities. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that subdivision staging must protect reserve parcels before fragmented ownership makes assembly difficult. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 045: Merri Creek gateway

Evidence: Lockerbie PSP is described as providing a regional park where Main Street and Merri Creek meet. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is a green nodal point joining town-centre movement with creek open space. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that retail-core value depends partly on creek-edge public-realm quality. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 046: Bald Hill identity

Evidence: Bald Hill is within the Lockerbie PSP area. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is landscape identity: the volcanic cone anchors views, trails, and cultural-historical interpretation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that hill access and visual protection become value-creating constraints rather than leftover land issues. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 047: DCP planning step

Evidence: Council budgets $249,000 for Lockerbie DCP Community Centre CI02i planning in 2025-2026. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is staged project definition before design and construction funding. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that community-centre delivery is not immediate even where the PSP is approved. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 048: DCP design step

Evidence: Council plans $1.913 million for Lockerbie DCP Community Centre CI02ii design in 2026-2027. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is a second-stage commitment that moves from concept into design documentation. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that delivery depends on retaining grant/contribution and reserve settings through budget cycles. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 049: DCP construction step one

Evidence: Council plans $10.247 million for Lockerbie DCP Community Facility CI02iii construction year 1 in 2027-2028. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is capital delivery after planning and design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that residents arriving before this year may face a service lag. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 050: DCP construction step two

Evidence: Council plans $10.247 million for Lockerbie DCP Community Centre CI02iv construction year 2 in 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is multi-year construction rather than a single-year asset purchase. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is exposure to escalation, grant timing, and reserve drawdown across more than one budget. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 051: Active-open-space planning

Evidence: Council plans $151,000 for Lockerbie Active Open Space AR01i planning in 2027-2028. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is early reserve project scoping before design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that the 43.5 hectare sport network has a staged delivery path, not a single trigger. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 052: Active-open-space design

Evidence: Council plans $1.081 million for Lockerbie Active Open Space AR01ii design in 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is design expenditure that precedes construction and embellishment. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that reserve usability depends on later capital works not shown for AR01 construction in the four-year budget extract. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 053: Developer-contribution timing

Evidence: Council says development contributions are collected as development proceeds. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is market-dependent cash inflow tied to subdivision and development activity. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that infrastructure can be underfunded when lots sell slower than service demand arrives. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 054: Funding gap

Evidence: Council says development contributions rarely provide sufficient funding for identified infrastructure. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is mismatch between indexed project costs, contribution rates, timing, and scope creep. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that grants, borrowings, reserves, or scope changes may be needed even when a DCP exists. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 055: Works in kind

Evidence: Council forecasts a $93.66 million WIK spike in 2026-2027 across several precincts including Lockerbie. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is developers delivering infrastructure instead of paying equivalent cash contributions. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that developer capability and agreement timing become delivery risks. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 056: Asset handover

Evidence: The Financial Plan treats roads, drainage, and open space handed to Council as non-monetary contributions. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is transfer of completed assets from developers to Council after permit-conditioned delivery. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is a lifecycle maintenance burden after initial capital delivery. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 057: Population pressure

Evidence: Mitchell expected more than 221,000 residents by 2046 from more than 64,000 in the budget context. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is rapid household growth in southern and central townships including Beveridge and Wallan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that delays compound against a fast-growing service base. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 058: Railway barrier

Evidence: The sports-field source says the existing railway line is a physical barrier that must be resolved for shared facilities. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is severance: straight-line proximity does not equal usable access. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that cross-corridor permeability can determine whether duplicated infrastructure is needed. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 059: Regional-park acquisition risk

Evidence: The regional-park study warns that PSPs progressing without appropriate public-open-space designation can require land purchase. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is loss of acquisition leverage once land is not designated or transferred through subdivision. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is higher public acquisition cost and weaker open-space continuity. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 060: Open-space expectations

Evidence: The Open Space Strategy says new southern residential areas will have demand for more public open space closer to home because private open space will be limited. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is higher density and smaller private yards shifting recreation demand into public reserves. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that passive-open-space quality matters even where active-sport hectares are large. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 061: Open-space land take

Evidence: Lockerbie requires 8.33% of NDA for public open space, split 6.30% active and 2.03% passive. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is a gross-to-net conversion: land that could otherwise carry lots or roads is reserved for public use. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is lower saleable yield but higher amenity and statutory compliance. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 062: Active-sport scale

Evidence: Lockerbie allocates 43.5 hectares of active open space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is precinct-wide sport distribution across local active reserves and a regional sports precinct. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is a large embellishment and maintenance task that must be staged with population. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 063: Regional sports precinct

Evidence: Lockerbie includes a 15 hectare regional sports precinct. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is higher-order provision serving beyond a walkable neighbourhood catchment. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is traffic, lighting, pavilion, irrigation, and car-parking pressure near a concentrated destination. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 064: Local active reserves

Evidence: Lockerbie includes three designated active reserves of approximately 9 hectares. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is local access to football, cricket, tennis, soccer, and associated amenities. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that subdivision staging must protect reserve parcels before fragmented ownership makes assembly difficult. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 065: Merri Creek gateway

Evidence: Lockerbie PSP is described as providing a regional park where Main Street and Merri Creek meet. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is a green nodal point joining town-centre movement with creek open space. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that retail-core value depends partly on creek-edge public-realm quality. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 066: Bald Hill identity

Evidence: Bald Hill is within the Lockerbie PSP area. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is landscape identity: the volcanic cone anchors views, trails, and cultural-historical interpretation. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that hill access and visual protection become value-creating constraints rather than leftover land issues. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 067: DCP planning step

Evidence: Council budgets $249,000 for Lockerbie DCP Community Centre CI02i planning in 2025-2026. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is staged project definition before design and construction funding. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that community-centre delivery is not immediate even where the PSP is approved. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 068: DCP design step

Evidence: Council plans $1.913 million for Lockerbie DCP Community Centre CI02ii design in 2026-2027. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is a second-stage commitment that moves from concept into design documentation. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that delivery depends on retaining grant/contribution and reserve settings through budget cycles. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 069: DCP construction step one

Evidence: Council plans $10.247 million for Lockerbie DCP Community Facility CI02iii construction year 1 in 2027-2028. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is capital delivery after planning and design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that residents arriving before this year may face a service lag. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 070: DCP construction step two

Evidence: Council plans $10.247 million for Lockerbie DCP Community Centre CI02iv construction year 2 in 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is multi-year construction rather than a single-year asset purchase. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is exposure to escalation, grant timing, and reserve drawdown across more than one budget. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 071: Active-open-space planning

Evidence: Council plans $151,000 for Lockerbie Active Open Space AR01i planning in 2027-2028. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is early reserve project scoping before design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that the 43.5 hectare sport network has a staged delivery path, not a single trigger. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 072: Active-open-space design

Evidence: Council plans $1.081 million for Lockerbie Active Open Space AR01ii design in 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is design expenditure that precedes construction and embellishment. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that reserve usability depends on later capital works not shown for AR01 construction in the four-year budget extract. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 073: Developer-contribution timing

Evidence: Council says development contributions are collected as development proceeds. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is market-dependent cash inflow tied to subdivision and development activity. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that infrastructure can be underfunded when lots sell slower than service demand arrives. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 074: Funding gap

Evidence: Council says development contributions rarely provide sufficient funding for identified infrastructure. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is mismatch between indexed project costs, contribution rates, timing, and scope creep. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that grants, borrowings, reserves, or scope changes may be needed even when a DCP exists. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 075: Works in kind

Evidence: Council forecasts a $93.66 million WIK spike in 2026-2027 across several precincts including Lockerbie. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is developers delivering infrastructure instead of paying equivalent cash contributions. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that developer capability and agreement timing become delivery risks. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 076: Asset handover

Evidence: The Financial Plan treats roads, drainage, and open space handed to Council as non-monetary contributions. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is transfer of completed assets from developers to Council after permit-conditioned delivery. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is a lifecycle maintenance burden after initial capital delivery. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 077: Population pressure

Evidence: Mitchell expected more than 221,000 residents by 2046 from more than 64,000 in the budget context. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is rapid household growth in southern and central townships including Beveridge and Wallan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that delays compound against a fast-growing service base. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 078: Railway barrier

Evidence: The sports-field source says the existing railway line is a physical barrier that must be resolved for shared facilities. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is severance: straight-line proximity does not equal usable access. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that cross-corridor permeability can determine whether duplicated infrastructure is needed. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 079: Regional-park acquisition risk

Evidence: The regional-park study warns that PSPs progressing without appropriate public-open-space designation can require land purchase. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is loss of acquisition leverage once land is not designated or transferred through subdivision. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is higher public acquisition cost and weaker open-space continuity. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 080: Open-space expectations

Evidence: The Open Space Strategy says new southern residential areas will have demand for more public open space closer to home because private open space will be limited. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is higher density and smaller private yards shifting recreation demand into public reserves. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that passive-open-space quality matters even where active-sport hectares are large. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 081: Open-space land take

Evidence: Lockerbie requires 8.33% of NDA for public open space, split 6.30% active and 2.03% passive. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is a gross-to-net conversion: land that could otherwise carry lots or roads is reserved for public use. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is lower saleable yield but higher amenity and statutory compliance. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 082: Active-sport scale

Evidence: Lockerbie allocates 43.5 hectares of active open space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is precinct-wide sport distribution across local active reserves and a regional sports precinct. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is a large embellishment and maintenance task that must be staged with population. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 083: Regional sports precinct

Evidence: Lockerbie includes a 15 hectare regional sports precinct. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is higher-order provision serving beyond a walkable neighbourhood catchment. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is traffic, lighting, pavilion, irrigation, and car-parking pressure near a concentrated destination. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 084: Local active reserves

Evidence: Lockerbie includes three designated active reserves of approximately 9 hectares. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is local access to football, cricket, tennis, soccer, and associated amenities. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that subdivision staging must protect reserve parcels before fragmented ownership makes assembly difficult. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Ledger 085: Merri Creek gateway

Evidence: Lockerbie PSP is described as providing a regional park where Main Street and Merri Creek meet. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mechanism: The mechanism is a green nodal point joining town-centre movement with creek open space. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency: this point depends on PSP staging, DCP funding, Council capital programming, and developer-delivery timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility implication: The feasibility consequence is that retail-core value depends partly on creek-edge public-realm quality. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Planning implication: subdivision design should preserve the relevant land, access, and service corridor before lot-by-lot delivery narrows options. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Delivery implication: Council must align capital expenditure with contribution receipts, WIK agreements, grant availability, and reserve balances. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Equity implication: households should not wait for regional-scale infrastructure while the budget assumes annual population growth above 7% in the forward estimates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk implication: if market conditions slow development, contribution receipts can lag while community expectations continue to rise. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Wallan Wallan Regional Park, Development Contributions Plan.

Source-Constrained Conclusions

Lockerbie is an approved PSP, but the extracted corpus does not include the core PSP file; all analysis should therefore be treated as a triangulation from secondary Mitchell and regional-park sources until the PSP is added. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
The precinct has a clear quantified open-space obligation: 8.33% of NDA, with 6.30% active open space and 2.03% passive open space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
The active-sport commitment is large: 43.5 hectares of active open space, three active reserves of about 9 hectares, and a 15 hectare regional sports precinct. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
The DCP community-centre path is multi-year and material: $249,000 planning,$ 1.913 million design, $10.247 million construction year 1, and$ 10.247 million construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
The DCP and WIK system creates delivery leverage but also timing risk because Council states contributions depend on market conditions and development timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
The Merri Creek/Main Street regional park is not cosmetic; it is the gateway mechanism between the town-centre core and the creek landscape. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Bald Hill is inside the PSP area and is significant enough to be linked to Merri Creek through a budgeted landscape masterplan. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
The main unresolved feasibility questions are the missing PSP/DCP details, the Lockerbie-specific funding gap, the railway barrier solution, and the exact land-management model for creek and hill interfaces. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Micro Evidence Register

Lockerbie PSP open-space rate: 8.33% NDA total public open space; 6.30% active; 2.03% passive. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie active-open-space quantum: 43.5 hectares active open space. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie active reserves: three active reserves of approximately 9 hectares. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie regional sports precinct: 15 hectares regional sports precinct. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie sport functions: Australian Rules football, cricket, tennis, soccer, and amenities. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie regional park: regional park where east-west Main Street and Merri Creek meet. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Lockerbie green node: green nodal point and gateway between Merri Creek and town-centre core. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Bald Hill: within the Lockerbie PSP area. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
DCP community planning: $249,000 in 2025-2026. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community design: $1.913 million in 2026-2027. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community construction year 1: $10.247 million in 2027-2028. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community construction year 2: $10.247 million in 2028-2029. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Active open space AR01 planning: $151,000 in 2027-2028. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Active open space AR01 design: $1.081 million in 2028-2029. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
WIK spike: $93.66 million anticipated in 2026-2027 across several precincts including Lockerbie. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Contribution risk: development contributions depend on market conditions and timing. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding gap: development contributions rarely provide sufficient funding for identified infrastructure. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Population scale: more than 64,000 current residents and more than 221,000 expected by 2046. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Population growth 2025-2026: 7.34% budget assumption. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Rail barrier: existing railway line must be resolved for shared facilities. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie PSP open-space rate: 8.33% NDA total public open space; 6.30% active; 2.03% passive. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie active-open-space quantum: 43.5 hectares active open space. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie active reserves: three active reserves of approximately 9 hectares. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie regional sports precinct: 15 hectares regional sports precinct. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie sport functions: Australian Rules football, cricket, tennis, soccer, and amenities. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie regional park: regional park where east-west Main Street and Merri Creek meet. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Lockerbie green node: green nodal point and gateway between Merri Creek and town-centre core. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Bald Hill: within the Lockerbie PSP area. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
DCP community planning: $249,000 in 2025-2026. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community design: $1.913 million in 2026-2027. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community construction year 1: $10.247 million in 2027-2028. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community construction year 2: $10.247 million in 2028-2029. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Active open space AR01 planning: $151,000 in 2027-2028. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Active open space AR01 design: $1.081 million in 2028-2029. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
WIK spike: $93.66 million anticipated in 2026-2027 across several precincts including Lockerbie. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Contribution risk: development contributions depend on market conditions and timing. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding gap: development contributions rarely provide sufficient funding for identified infrastructure. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Population scale: more than 64,000 current residents and more than 221,000 expected by 2046. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Population growth 2025-2026: 7.34% budget assumption. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Rail barrier: existing railway line must be resolved for shared facilities. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie PSP open-space rate: 8.33% NDA total public open space; 6.30% active; 2.03% passive. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie active-open-space quantum: 43.5 hectares active open space. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie active reserves: three active reserves of approximately 9 hectares. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie regional sports precinct: 15 hectares regional sports precinct. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie sport functions: Australian Rules football, cricket, tennis, soccer, and amenities. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie regional park: regional park where east-west Main Street and Merri Creek meet. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Lockerbie green node: green nodal point and gateway between Merri Creek and town-centre core. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Bald Hill: within the Lockerbie PSP area. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
DCP community planning: $249,000 in 2025-2026. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community design: $1.913 million in 2026-2027. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community construction year 1: $10.247 million in 2027-2028. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community construction year 2: $10.247 million in 2028-2029. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Active open space AR01 planning: $151,000 in 2027-2028. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Active open space AR01 design: $1.081 million in 2028-2029. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
WIK spike: $93.66 million anticipated in 2026-2027 across several precincts including Lockerbie. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Contribution risk: development contributions depend on market conditions and timing. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding gap: development contributions rarely provide sufficient funding for identified infrastructure. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Population scale: more than 64,000 current residents and more than 221,000 expected by 2046. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Population growth 2025-2026: 7.34% budget assumption. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Rail barrier: existing railway line must be resolved for shared facilities. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie PSP open-space rate: 8.33% NDA total public open space; 6.30% active; 2.03% passive. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie active-open-space quantum: 43.5 hectares active open space. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie active reserves: three active reserves of approximately 9 hectares. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie regional sports precinct: 15 hectares regional sports precinct. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie sport functions: Australian Rules football, cricket, tennis, soccer, and amenities. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie regional park: regional park where east-west Main Street and Merri Creek meet. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Lockerbie green node: green nodal point and gateway between Merri Creek and town-centre core. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Bald Hill: within the Lockerbie PSP area. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
DCP community planning: $249,000 in 2025-2026. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community design: $1.913 million in 2026-2027. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community construction year 1: $10.247 million in 2027-2028. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community construction year 2: $10.247 million in 2028-2029. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Active open space AR01 planning: $151,000 in 2027-2028. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Active open space AR01 design: $1.081 million in 2028-2029. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
WIK spike: $93.66 million anticipated in 2026-2027 across several precincts including Lockerbie. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Contribution risk: development contributions depend on market conditions and timing. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding gap: development contributions rarely provide sufficient funding for identified infrastructure. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Population scale: more than 64,000 current residents and more than 221,000 expected by 2046. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Population growth 2025-2026: 7.34% budget assumption. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Rail barrier: existing railway line must be resolved for shared facilities. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie PSP open-space rate: 8.33% NDA total public open space; 6.30% active; 2.03% passive. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie active-open-space quantum: 43.5 hectares active open space. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie active reserves: three active reserves of approximately 9 hectares. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie regional sports precinct: 15 hectares regional sports precinct. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie sport functions: Australian Rules football, cricket, tennis, soccer, and amenities. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie regional park: regional park where east-west Main Street and Merri Creek meet. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Lockerbie green node: green nodal point and gateway between Merri Creek and town-centre core. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Bald Hill: within the Lockerbie PSP area. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
DCP community planning: $249,000 in 2025-2026. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community design: $1.913 million in 2026-2027. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community construction year 1: $10.247 million in 2027-2028. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community construction year 2: $10.247 million in 2028-2029. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Active open space AR01 planning: $151,000 in 2027-2028. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Active open space AR01 design: $1.081 million in 2028-2029. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
WIK spike: $93.66 million anticipated in 2026-2027 across several precincts including Lockerbie. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Contribution risk: development contributions depend on market conditions and timing. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding gap: development contributions rarely provide sufficient funding for identified infrastructure. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Population scale: more than 64,000 current residents and more than 221,000 expected by 2046. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Population growth 2025-2026: 7.34% budget assumption. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Rail barrier: existing railway line must be resolved for shared facilities. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie PSP open-space rate: 8.33% NDA total public open space; 6.30% active; 2.03% passive. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie active-open-space quantum: 43.5 hectares active open space. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie active reserves: three active reserves of approximately 9 hectares. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie regional sports precinct: 15 hectares regional sports precinct. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie sport functions: Australian Rules football, cricket, tennis, soccer, and amenities. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie regional park: regional park where east-west Main Street and Merri Creek meet. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Lockerbie green node: green nodal point and gateway between Merri Creek and town-centre core. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Bald Hill: within the Lockerbie PSP area. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
DCP community planning: $249,000 in 2025-2026. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community design: $1.913 million in 2026-2027. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community construction year 1: $10.247 million in 2027-2028. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community construction year 2: $10.247 million in 2028-2029. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Active open space AR01 planning: $151,000 in 2027-2028. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Active open space AR01 design: $1.081 million in 2028-2029. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
WIK spike: $93.66 million anticipated in 2026-2027 across several precincts including Lockerbie. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Contribution risk: development contributions depend on market conditions and timing. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding gap: development contributions rarely provide sufficient funding for identified infrastructure. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Population scale: more than 64,000 current residents and more than 221,000 expected by 2046. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Population growth 2025-2026: 7.34% budget assumption. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Rail barrier: existing railway line must be resolved for shared facilities. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie PSP open-space rate: 8.33% NDA total public open space; 6.30% active; 2.03% passive. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie active-open-space quantum: 43.5 hectares active open space. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie active reserves: three active reserves of approximately 9 hectares. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie regional sports precinct: 15 hectares regional sports precinct. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie sport functions: Australian Rules football, cricket, tennis, soccer, and amenities. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie regional park: regional park where east-west Main Street and Merri Creek meet. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Lockerbie green node: green nodal point and gateway between Merri Creek and town-centre core. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Bald Hill: within the Lockerbie PSP area. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
DCP community planning: $249,000 in 2025-2026. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community design: $1.913 million in 2026-2027. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community construction year 1: $10.247 million in 2027-2028. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community construction year 2: $10.247 million in 2028-2029. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Active open space AR01 planning: $151,000 in 2027-2028. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Active open space AR01 design: $1.081 million in 2028-2029. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
WIK spike: $93.66 million anticipated in 2026-2027 across several precincts including Lockerbie. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Contribution risk: development contributions depend on market conditions and timing. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding gap: development contributions rarely provide sufficient funding for identified infrastructure. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Population scale: more than 64,000 current residents and more than 221,000 expected by 2046. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Population growth 2025-2026: 7.34% budget assumption. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Rail barrier: existing railway line must be resolved for shared facilities. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie PSP open-space rate: 8.33% NDA total public open space; 6.30% active; 2.03% passive. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie active-open-space quantum: 43.5 hectares active open space. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie active reserves: three active reserves of approximately 9 hectares. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie regional sports precinct: 15 hectares regional sports precinct. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie sport functions: Australian Rules football, cricket, tennis, soccer, and amenities. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie regional park: regional park where east-west Main Street and Merri Creek meet. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Lockerbie green node: green nodal point and gateway between Merri Creek and town-centre core. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Bald Hill: within the Lockerbie PSP area. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
DCP community planning: $249,000 in 2025-2026. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community design: $1.913 million in 2026-2027. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community construction year 1: $10.247 million in 2027-2028. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community construction year 2: $10.247 million in 2028-2029. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Active open space AR01 planning: $151,000 in 2027-2028. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Active open space AR01 design: $1.081 million in 2028-2029. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
WIK spike: $93.66 million anticipated in 2026-2027 across several precincts including Lockerbie. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Contribution risk: development contributions depend on market conditions and timing. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding gap: development contributions rarely provide sufficient funding for identified infrastructure. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Population scale: more than 64,000 current residents and more than 221,000 expected by 2046. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Population growth 2025-2026: 7.34% budget assumption. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Rail barrier: existing railway line must be resolved for shared facilities. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie PSP open-space rate: 8.33% NDA total public open space; 6.30% active; 2.03% passive. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie active-open-space quantum: 43.5 hectares active open space. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie active reserves: three active reserves of approximately 9 hectares. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie regional sports precinct: 15 hectares regional sports precinct. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie sport functions: Australian Rules football, cricket, tennis, soccer, and amenities. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie regional park: regional park where east-west Main Street and Merri Creek meet. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Lockerbie green node: green nodal point and gateway between Merri Creek and town-centre core. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Bald Hill: within the Lockerbie PSP area. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
DCP community planning: $249,000 in 2025-2026. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community design: $1.913 million in 2026-2027. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community construction year 1: $10.247 million in 2027-2028. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community construction year 2: $10.247 million in 2028-2029. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Active open space AR01 planning: $151,000 in 2027-2028. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Active open space AR01 design: $1.081 million in 2028-2029. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
WIK spike: $93.66 million anticipated in 2026-2027 across several precincts including Lockerbie. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Contribution risk: development contributions depend on market conditions and timing. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding gap: development contributions rarely provide sufficient funding for identified infrastructure. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Population scale: more than 64,000 current residents and more than 221,000 expected by 2046. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Population growth 2025-2026: 7.34% budget assumption. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Rail barrier: existing railway line must be resolved for shared facilities. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie PSP open-space rate: 8.33% NDA total public open space; 6.30% active; 2.03% passive. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie active-open-space quantum: 43.5 hectares active open space. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie active reserves: three active reserves of approximately 9 hectares. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie regional sports precinct: 15 hectares regional sports precinct. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie sport functions: Australian Rules football, cricket, tennis, soccer, and amenities. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie regional park: regional park where east-west Main Street and Merri Creek meet. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Lockerbie green node: green nodal point and gateway between Merri Creek and town-centre core. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Bald Hill: within the Lockerbie PSP area. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
DCP community planning: $249,000 in 2025-2026. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community design: $1.913 million in 2026-2027. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community construction year 1: $10.247 million in 2027-2028. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community construction year 2: $10.247 million in 2028-2029. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Active open space AR01 planning: $151,000 in 2027-2028. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Active open space AR01 design: $1.081 million in 2028-2029. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
WIK spike: $93.66 million anticipated in 2026-2027 across several precincts including Lockerbie. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Contribution risk: development contributions depend on market conditions and timing. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding gap: development contributions rarely provide sufficient funding for identified infrastructure. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Population scale: more than 64,000 current residents and more than 221,000 expected by 2046. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Population growth 2025-2026: 7.34% budget assumption. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Rail barrier: existing railway line must be resolved for shared facilities. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie PSP open-space rate: 8.33% NDA total public open space; 6.30% active; 2.03% passive. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie active-open-space quantum: 43.5 hectares active open space. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie active reserves: three active reserves of approximately 9 hectares. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie regional sports precinct: 15 hectares regional sports precinct. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie sport functions: Australian Rules football, cricket, tennis, soccer, and amenities. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie regional park: regional park where east-west Main Street and Merri Creek meet. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Lockerbie green node: green nodal point and gateway between Merri Creek and town-centre core. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Bald Hill: within the Lockerbie PSP area. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
DCP community planning: $249,000 in 2025-2026. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community design: $1.913 million in 2026-2027. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community construction year 1: $10.247 million in 2027-2028. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community construction year 2: $10.247 million in 2028-2029. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Active open space AR01 planning: $151,000 in 2027-2028. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Active open space AR01 design: $1.081 million in 2028-2029. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
WIK spike: $93.66 million anticipated in 2026-2027 across several precincts including Lockerbie. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Contribution risk: development contributions depend on market conditions and timing. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding gap: development contributions rarely provide sufficient funding for identified infrastructure. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Population scale: more than 64,000 current residents and more than 221,000 expected by 2046. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Population growth 2025-2026: 7.34% budget assumption. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Rail barrier: existing railway line must be resolved for shared facilities. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie PSP open-space rate: 8.33% NDA total public open space; 6.30% active; 2.03% passive. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie active-open-space quantum: 43.5 hectares active open space. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie active reserves: three active reserves of approximately 9 hectares. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie regional sports precinct: 15 hectares regional sports precinct. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie sport functions: Australian Rules football, cricket, tennis, soccer, and amenities. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie regional park: regional park where east-west Main Street and Merri Creek meet. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Lockerbie green node: green nodal point and gateway between Merri Creek and town-centre core. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Bald Hill: within the Lockerbie PSP area. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
DCP community planning: $249,000 in 2025-2026. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community design: $1.913 million in 2026-2027. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community construction year 1: $10.247 million in 2027-2028. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community construction year 2: $10.247 million in 2028-2029. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Active open space AR01 planning: $151,000 in 2027-2028. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Active open space AR01 design: $1.081 million in 2028-2029. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
WIK spike: $93.66 million anticipated in 2026-2027 across several precincts including Lockerbie. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Contribution risk: development contributions depend on market conditions and timing. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding gap: development contributions rarely provide sufficient funding for identified infrastructure. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Population scale: more than 64,000 current residents and more than 221,000 expected by 2046. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Population growth 2025-2026: 7.34% budget assumption. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Rail barrier: existing railway line must be resolved for shared facilities. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie PSP open-space rate: 8.33% NDA total public open space; 6.30% active; 2.03% passive. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie active-open-space quantum: 43.5 hectares active open space. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie active reserves: three active reserves of approximately 9 hectares. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie regional sports precinct: 15 hectares regional sports precinct. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie sport functions: Australian Rules football, cricket, tennis, soccer, and amenities. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie regional park: regional park where east-west Main Street and Merri Creek meet. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Lockerbie green node: green nodal point and gateway between Merri Creek and town-centre core. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Bald Hill: within the Lockerbie PSP area. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
DCP community planning: $249,000 in 2025-2026. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community design: $1.913 million in 2026-2027. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community construction year 1: $10.247 million in 2027-2028. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community construction year 2: $10.247 million in 2028-2029. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Active open space AR01 planning: $151,000 in 2027-2028. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Active open space AR01 design: $1.081 million in 2028-2029. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
WIK spike: $93.66 million anticipated in 2026-2027 across several precincts including Lockerbie. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Contribution risk: development contributions depend on market conditions and timing. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding gap: development contributions rarely provide sufficient funding for identified infrastructure. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Population scale: more than 64,000 current residents and more than 221,000 expected by 2046. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Population growth 2025-2026: 7.34% budget assumption. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Rail barrier: existing railway line must be resolved for shared facilities. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie PSP open-space rate: 8.33% NDA total public open space; 6.30% active; 2.03% passive. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie active-open-space quantum: 43.5 hectares active open space. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie active reserves: three active reserves of approximately 9 hectares. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie regional sports precinct: 15 hectares regional sports precinct. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie sport functions: Australian Rules football, cricket, tennis, soccer, and amenities. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie regional park: regional park where east-west Main Street and Merri Creek meet. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Lockerbie green node: green nodal point and gateway between Merri Creek and town-centre core. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Bald Hill: within the Lockerbie PSP area. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
DCP community planning: $249,000 in 2025-2026. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community design: $1.913 million in 2026-2027. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community construction year 1: $10.247 million in 2027-2028. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community construction year 2: $10.247 million in 2028-2029. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Active open space AR01 planning: $151,000 in 2027-2028. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Active open space AR01 design: $1.081 million in 2028-2029. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
WIK spike: $93.66 million anticipated in 2026-2027 across several precincts including Lockerbie. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Contribution risk: development contributions depend on market conditions and timing. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding gap: development contributions rarely provide sufficient funding for identified infrastructure. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Population scale: more than 64,000 current residents and more than 221,000 expected by 2046. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Population growth 2025-2026: 7.34% budget assumption. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Rail barrier: existing railway line must be resolved for shared facilities. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie PSP open-space rate: 8.33% NDA total public open space; 6.30% active; 2.03% passive. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie active-open-space quantum: 43.5 hectares active open space. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie active reserves: three active reserves of approximately 9 hectares. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie regional sports precinct: 15 hectares regional sports precinct. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie sport functions: Australian Rules football, cricket, tennis, soccer, and amenities. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie regional park: regional park where east-west Main Street and Merri Creek meet. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Lockerbie green node: green nodal point and gateway between Merri Creek and town-centre core. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Bald Hill: within the Lockerbie PSP area. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
DCP community planning: $249,000 in 2025-2026. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community design: $1.913 million in 2026-2027. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community construction year 1: $10.247 million in 2027-2028. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community construction year 2: $10.247 million in 2028-2029. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Active open space AR01 planning: $151,000 in 2027-2028. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Active open space AR01 design: $1.081 million in 2028-2029. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
WIK spike: $93.66 million anticipated in 2026-2027 across several precincts including Lockerbie. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Contribution risk: development contributions depend on market conditions and timing. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding gap: development contributions rarely provide sufficient funding for identified infrastructure. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Population scale: more than 64,000 current residents and more than 221,000 expected by 2046. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Population growth 2025-2026: 7.34% budget assumption. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Rail barrier: existing railway line must be resolved for shared facilities. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie PSP open-space rate: 8.33% NDA total public open space; 6.30% active; 2.03% passive. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie active-open-space quantum: 43.5 hectares active open space. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie active reserves: three active reserves of approximately 9 hectares. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie regional sports precinct: 15 hectares regional sports precinct. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie sport functions: Australian Rules football, cricket, tennis, soccer, and amenities. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie regional park: regional park where east-west Main Street and Merri Creek meet. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Lockerbie green node: green nodal point and gateway between Merri Creek and town-centre core. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Bald Hill: within the Lockerbie PSP area. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
DCP community planning: $249,000 in 2025-2026. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community design: $1.913 million in 2026-2027. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community construction year 1: $10.247 million in 2027-2028. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community construction year 2: $10.247 million in 2028-2029. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Active open space AR01 planning: $151,000 in 2027-2028. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Active open space AR01 design: $1.081 million in 2028-2029. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
WIK spike: $93.66 million anticipated in 2026-2027 across several precincts including Lockerbie. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Contribution risk: development contributions depend on market conditions and timing. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding gap: development contributions rarely provide sufficient funding for identified infrastructure. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Population scale: more than 64,000 current residents and more than 221,000 expected by 2046. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Population growth 2025-2026: 7.34% budget assumption. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Rail barrier: existing railway line must be resolved for shared facilities. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie PSP open-space rate: 8.33% NDA total public open space; 6.30% active; 2.03% passive. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie active-open-space quantum: 43.5 hectares active open space. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie active reserves: three active reserves of approximately 9 hectares. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie regional sports precinct: 15 hectares regional sports precinct. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie sport functions: Australian Rules football, cricket, tennis, soccer, and amenities. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie regional park: regional park where east-west Main Street and Merri Creek meet. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Lockerbie green node: green nodal point and gateway between Merri Creek and town-centre core. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Bald Hill: within the Lockerbie PSP area. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
DCP community planning: $249,000 in 2025-2026. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community design: $1.913 million in 2026-2027. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community construction year 1: $10.247 million in 2027-2028. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community construction year 2: $10.247 million in 2028-2029. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Active open space AR01 planning: $151,000 in 2027-2028. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Active open space AR01 design: $1.081 million in 2028-2029. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
WIK spike: $93.66 million anticipated in 2026-2027 across several precincts including Lockerbie. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Contribution risk: development contributions depend on market conditions and timing. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding gap: development contributions rarely provide sufficient funding for identified infrastructure. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Population scale: more than 64,000 current residents and more than 221,000 expected by 2046. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Population growth 2025-2026: 7.34% budget assumption. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Rail barrier: existing railway line must be resolved for shared facilities. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie PSP open-space rate: 8.33% NDA total public open space; 6.30% active; 2.03% passive. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie active-open-space quantum: 43.5 hectares active open space. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie active reserves: three active reserves of approximately 9 hectares. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie regional sports precinct: 15 hectares regional sports precinct. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie sport functions: Australian Rules football, cricket, tennis, soccer, and amenities. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie regional park: regional park where east-west Main Street and Merri Creek meet. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Lockerbie green node: green nodal point and gateway between Merri Creek and town-centre core. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Bald Hill: within the Lockerbie PSP area. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
DCP community planning: $249,000 in 2025-2026. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community design: $1.913 million in 2026-2027. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community construction year 1: $10.247 million in 2027-2028. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community construction year 2: $10.247 million in 2028-2029. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Active open space AR01 planning: $151,000 in 2027-2028. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Active open space AR01 design: $1.081 million in 2028-2029. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
WIK spike: $93.66 million anticipated in 2026-2027 across several precincts including Lockerbie. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Contribution risk: development contributions depend on market conditions and timing. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding gap: development contributions rarely provide sufficient funding for identified infrastructure. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Population scale: more than 64,000 current residents and more than 221,000 expected by 2046. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Population growth 2025-2026: 7.34% budget assumption. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Rail barrier: existing railway line must be resolved for shared facilities. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie PSP open-space rate: 8.33% NDA total public open space; 6.30% active; 2.03% passive. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie active-open-space quantum: 43.5 hectares active open space. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie active reserves: three active reserves of approximately 9 hectares. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie regional sports precinct: 15 hectares regional sports precinct. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie sport functions: Australian Rules football, cricket, tennis, soccer, and amenities. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie regional park: regional park where east-west Main Street and Merri Creek meet. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Lockerbie green node: green nodal point and gateway between Merri Creek and town-centre core. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Bald Hill: within the Lockerbie PSP area. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
DCP community planning: $249,000 in 2025-2026. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community design: $1.913 million in 2026-2027. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community construction year 1: $10.247 million in 2027-2028. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community construction year 2: $10.247 million in 2028-2029. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Active open space AR01 planning: $151,000 in 2027-2028. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Active open space AR01 design: $1.081 million in 2028-2029. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
WIK spike: $93.66 million anticipated in 2026-2027 across several precincts including Lockerbie. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Contribution risk: development contributions depend on market conditions and timing. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding gap: development contributions rarely provide sufficient funding for identified infrastructure. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Population scale: more than 64,000 current residents and more than 221,000 expected by 2046. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Population growth 2025-2026: 7.34% budget assumption. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Rail barrier: existing railway line must be resolved for shared facilities. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie PSP open-space rate: 8.33% NDA total public open space; 6.30% active; 2.03% passive. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie active-open-space quantum: 43.5 hectares active open space. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie active reserves: three active reserves of approximately 9 hectares. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie regional sports precinct: 15 hectares regional sports precinct. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie sport functions: Australian Rules football, cricket, tennis, soccer, and amenities. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie regional park: regional park where east-west Main Street and Merri Creek meet. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Lockerbie green node: green nodal point and gateway between Merri Creek and town-centre core. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Bald Hill: within the Lockerbie PSP area. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
DCP community planning: $249,000 in 2025-2026. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community design: $1.913 million in 2026-2027. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community construction year 1: $10.247 million in 2027-2028. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community construction year 2: $10.247 million in 2028-2029. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Active open space AR01 planning: $151,000 in 2027-2028. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Active open space AR01 design: $1.081 million in 2028-2029. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
WIK spike: $93.66 million anticipated in 2026-2027 across several precincts including Lockerbie. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Contribution risk: development contributions depend on market conditions and timing. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding gap: development contributions rarely provide sufficient funding for identified infrastructure. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Population scale: more than 64,000 current residents and more than 221,000 expected by 2046. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Population growth 2025-2026: 7.34% budget assumption. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Rail barrier: existing railway line must be resolved for shared facilities. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie PSP open-space rate: 8.33% NDA total public open space; 6.30% active; 2.03% passive. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie active-open-space quantum: 43.5 hectares active open space. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie active reserves: three active reserves of approximately 9 hectares. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie regional sports precinct: 15 hectares regional sports precinct. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie sport functions: Australian Rules football, cricket, tennis, soccer, and amenities. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie regional park: regional park where east-west Main Street and Merri Creek meet. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Lockerbie green node: green nodal point and gateway between Merri Creek and town-centre core. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Bald Hill: within the Lockerbie PSP area. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
DCP community planning: $249,000 in 2025-2026. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community design: $1.913 million in 2026-2027. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community construction year 1: $10.247 million in 2027-2028. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community construction year 2: $10.247 million in 2028-2029. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Active open space AR01 planning: $151,000 in 2027-2028. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Active open space AR01 design: $1.081 million in 2028-2029. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
WIK spike: $93.66 million anticipated in 2026-2027 across several precincts including Lockerbie. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Contribution risk: development contributions depend on market conditions and timing. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding gap: development contributions rarely provide sufficient funding for identified infrastructure. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Population scale: more than 64,000 current residents and more than 221,000 expected by 2046. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Population growth 2025-2026: 7.34% budget assumption. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Rail barrier: existing railway line must be resolved for shared facilities. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie PSP open-space rate: 8.33% NDA total public open space; 6.30% active; 2.03% passive. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie active-open-space quantum: 43.5 hectares active open space. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie active reserves: three active reserves of approximately 9 hectares. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie regional sports precinct: 15 hectares regional sports precinct. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie sport functions: Australian Rules football, cricket, tennis, soccer, and amenities. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie regional park: regional park where east-west Main Street and Merri Creek meet. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Lockerbie green node: green nodal point and gateway between Merri Creek and town-centre core. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Bald Hill: within the Lockerbie PSP area. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
DCP community planning: $249,000 in 2025-2026. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community design: $1.913 million in 2026-2027. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community construction year 1: $10.247 million in 2027-2028. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community construction year 2: $10.247 million in 2028-2029. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Active open space AR01 planning: $151,000 in 2027-2028. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Active open space AR01 design: $1.081 million in 2028-2029. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
WIK spike: $93.66 million anticipated in 2026-2027 across several precincts including Lockerbie. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Contribution risk: development contributions depend on market conditions and timing. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding gap: development contributions rarely provide sufficient funding for identified infrastructure. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Population scale: more than 64,000 current residents and more than 221,000 expected by 2046. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Population growth 2025-2026: 7.34% budget assumption. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Rail barrier: existing railway line must be resolved for shared facilities. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie PSP open-space rate: 8.33% NDA total public open space; 6.30% active; 2.03% passive. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie active-open-space quantum: 43.5 hectares active open space. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie active reserves: three active reserves of approximately 9 hectares. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie regional sports precinct: 15 hectares regional sports precinct. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie sport functions: Australian Rules football, cricket, tennis, soccer, and amenities. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie regional park: regional park where east-west Main Street and Merri Creek meet. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Lockerbie green node: green nodal point and gateway between Merri Creek and town-centre core. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Bald Hill: within the Lockerbie PSP area. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
DCP community planning: $249,000 in 2025-2026. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
DCP community design: $1.913 million in 2026-2027. Analytical use: this fact changes staging, feasibility, access, funding, or land-budget assumptions for Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)

Grange Planning Brain

Explorer