title: Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan council: mitchell state: vic category: growth-area classification: MAJOR status: approved last_compiled: 2026-05-04 source_docs:

mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt
feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt
beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt
mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt
mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt
final-moss-03oct13-web.txt

Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan

Mitchell Shire Beveridge Lockerbie Precinct Structure Plan Beveridge Central PSP Beveridge North West PSP Wallan South PSP Wallan Wallan Regional Park North Growth Corridor Development Contributions Plan Infrastructure Contributions Plan Merri Creek Mount Fraser Bald Hill Hernes Swamp

Analytical Position

Lockerbie North is an approved northern-growth-area precinct in Mitchell Shire whose local evidence is strongest on open-space rates, active-sport land, district facility dependencies, and Council capital-program timing, but weak on the primary statutory PSP and DCP instruments themselves. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)

The core quantitative spine is that Lockerbie North requires public open space equal to 9.15% of Net Developable Area, made up of 5.9% active open space and 3.24% passive open space, and includes 17.5 hectares of active playing space across an 8.0 hectare reserve and a 9.5 hectare reserve. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)

The delivery spine is a Council capital ledger of $104.334 million across 28 identifiable Lockerbie North DCP or Lockerbie North lines in the 2025-2026 to 2034-2035 financial plan and 2025-2026 budget, with$ 46.083 million shown against reserves, $58.096 million shown as confirmed grants or contributions, and$ 0.155 million shown as unconfirmed grant dependency for indoor recreation pre-planning. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)

The mechanism is not a single approval event: the PSP spatially fixes land use and open-space obligations, the DCP translates selected infrastructure into chargeable projects, Council reserves hold restricted contributions, works-in-kind can substitute delivery for cash, and the capital program sequences design and construction across multiple financial years. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)

The most important caveat is that no extracted Mitchell file with Lockerbie North PSP or Lockerbie North DCP in the filename was found in the local extracted corpus, so this page treats absent statutory detail as an evidence gap and relies on the available Council, sport, open-space, and regional-park documents for quantified analysis. (Source: local corpus inventory; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Core Quantified Findings

Lockerbie North is listed by the Wallan Regional Park feasibility work as a completed PSP, with the PSP dated 2012 in the completed-precinct table. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
The Wallan Regional Park feasibility table states that Lockerbie North is south of Mount Fraser and outside the Wallan Regional Park study area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
The same feasibility table states that Lockerbie North does not contain major natural assets that would lend themselves to incorporation in the Wallan Regional Park. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
The same feasibility table states that 27 hectares of active and passive open space is included in the Lockerbie North PSP. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
The same feasibility table states that the approved Lockerbie North PSP does not reference the future Wallan Regional Park. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Lockerbie North has a total public-open-space contribution of 9.15% of Net Developable Area. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
The Lockerbie North public-open-space contribution is split into 5.9% active open space and 3.24% passive open space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
The published active and passive components sum to 9.14%, which is 0.01 percentage points below the published total of 9.15%, so the available source contains a rounding discrepancy. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie PSP is a useful comparator because it has an 8.33% public-open-space contribution, split into 6.30% active open space and 2.03% passive open space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie North therefore has a 0.82 percentage-point higher total open-space contribution than Lockerbie PSP. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie North has a 0.40 percentage-point lower active-open-space component than Lockerbie PSP. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie North has a 1.21 percentage-point higher passive-open-space component than Lockerbie PSP. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie North includes 17.5 hectares of active playing space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
The 17.5 hectares of active playing space is made up of one 8.0 hectare reserve and one 9.5 hectare reserve. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
The 8.0 hectare reserve includes two full-size Australian Rules football and cricket ovals, cricket nets, and a playground. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
The 8.0 hectare reserve is to be located with an indoor recreation facility and a state primary/secondary school. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
The 9.5 hectare southern reserve includes either two full-size Australian Rules football and cricket ovals or three full-size soccer fields. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
The 9.5 hectare southern reserve includes cricket nets, six tennis courts, two netball courts, and a playground. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
The 9.5 hectare southern reserve is co-located with a state primary school and a potential non-government school. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
The Beveridge Central Active Open Space Master Plan describes the adjacent Lockerbie North PSP northern active open space as 8.0 hectares with two ovals, six tennis courts, and two netball or tennis courts. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
The Beveridge Central Active Open Space Master Plan describes the Lockerbie North PSP southern active open space as 9.5 hectares with two ovals, two overlaid rectangular pitches, one athletics track, and six tennis courts. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
The later Beveridge Central evidence changes the southern reserve emphasis from three full-size soccer fields to two overlaid rectangular pitches plus one athletics track. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Beveridge Central AOS is planned for soccer and cricket, while tennis demand is expected to be served in coming years by the two active open spaces in the adjacent Lockerbie North PSP. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Beveridge had an estimated 2024 population of 9,120 and is forecast to exceed 112,000 people by 2046. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
The Beveridge Central demand table estimates 639 cricket participants in 2024, equivalent to 42 cricket teams. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
The Beveridge Central demand table estimates 1,322 soccer participants in 2024, equivalent to 88 soccer teams. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
The same demand table translates 42 cricket teams into six cricket ovals using a six-to-seven-team-per-oval benchmark. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
The same demand table translates 88 soccer teams into 11 soccer pitches using a seven-to-eight-team-per-pitch benchmark. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Donnybrook PSP is expected to join future Lockerbie and Lockerbie North developments, and residents are expected to share facilities and services across council boundaries. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
The existing railway line is identified as a physical barrier that will need to be resolved for shared facilities and services. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Mitchell Shire had more than 64,000 residents in the 2025-2026 budget context and expects more than 221,000 residents by 2046. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Mitchell Shire expects continued growth beyond 2046 toward 250,000 residents. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
The budget forecasts population growth of 7.34% in 2025-2026, 7.47% in 2026-2027, 7.16% in 2027-2028, and 7.12% in 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
The financial plan forecasts developer contributions of $27.056 million in 2025-2026,$ 27.524 million in 2026-2027, $30.047 million in 2027-2028, and$ 19.367 million in 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
The budget forecasts non-monetary contributions of $60.859 million in 2025-2026,$ 123.668 million in 2026-2027, $59.247 million in 2027-2028, and$ 68.419 million in 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
The financial plan says non-monetary asset handovers are forecast at $28.00 million in 2025-2026 and increase by$ 2.00 million each year until reaching $40.00 million in 2031-2032. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
The financial plan attributes the 2026-2027 non-monetary contribution spike to $93.66 million of anticipated developer-delivered works-in-kind, predominantly in Beveridge Central, Beveridge North West, Kilmore South East, Lockerbie, and Lockerbie North. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
The budget states that development contributions are collected as development proceeds. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
The budget states that development-contribution flows create cash-flow challenges for Council. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
The budget identifies borrowings, partnerships, works-in-kind processes, and grant advocacy as mitigation measures for development-contribution cash-flow challenges. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
The budget states that development contributions rarely provide sufficient funding for the infrastructure identified. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
The budget states that delays between contribution collection and infrastructure delivery can exacerbate the infrastructure funding gap. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
The budget states that development contributions and infrastructure funding depend on market conditions and development timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
The financial plan says developer contributions are transferred to restricted reserves until used for specific capital-works purposes. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
The financial plan says developer contributions often require Council to outlay funds before receiving developer contributions. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies Mount Fraser as outside the Lockerbie North PSP. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies Bald Hill as within the Lockerbie PSP area, not the Lockerbie North PSP area. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies volcanic cones including Bald Hill, Mount Fraser, Spring Hill, and Green Hill as regional open-space elements in the southern growth area. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies Hernes Swamp as part of the potential southern-growth-area regional park system. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work says completed PSPs such as Lockerbie North cannot use the PSP process to acquire additional Wallan Regional Park land without purchase or another mechanism. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work says land for the future regional park should be identified in PSPs and transferred under ICPs where possible to avoid purchase. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work identifies Public Acquisition Overlays as a mechanism for land not transferable under a PSP or ICP. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work identifies GAIC works-in-kind agreements as a possible mechanism for regional or state-level public purposes. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)

Source Inventory

The target page wiki/vic/mitchell/growth-areas/lockerbie-north-psp.md existed as a zero-line page before this rewrite. (Source: local filesystem inventory)
No extracted Mitchell file with Lockerbie North in the filename was found in the local extracted corpus. (Source: local filesystem inventory)
No extracted Mitchell file with Lockerbie North PSP in the filename was found in the local extracted corpus. (Source: local filesystem inventory)
No extracted Mitchell file with Lockerbie North DCP in the filename was found in the local extracted corpus. (Source: local filesystem inventory)
The file mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt was read because its filename matches the requested sports-field feasibility pattern. (Source: local filesystem inventory)
The file mitchell_sports_field_feasibility_study_finalsmall.txt is a duplicate-naming variant of the sports-field feasibility extract and was identified in the corpus search. (Source: local filesystem inventory)
The file feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt was read because its filename matches the requested Wallan Regional Park feasibility pattern. (Source: local filesystem inventory)
The file feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park_report-2022-compressed.txt is a duplicate-naming variant of the Wallan Regional Park feasibility extract and was identified in the corpus search. (Source: local filesystem inventory)
The file beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt was read because its filename matches the requested Beveridge Central active-open-space master-plan pattern. (Source: local filesystem inventory)
The file final-moss-03oct13-web.txt was read because it contains Lockerbie North references and regional open-space context. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
The file mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt was read because it contains Lockerbie North DCP project lines and development-contribution mechanics. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
The file mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt was read because it contains the 10-year Lockerbie North DCP capital ledger. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
The requested schema file schema/CLAUDE.md was not found at C:\pi\schema\CLAUDE.md during local filesystem inspection. (Source: local filesystem inventory)
Because the schema file was absent, this page follows the user’s stated standard directly: quantified claims, mechanisms, staging, contested issues, feasibility implications, wikilinks, and sourced facts. (Source: user task brief)

Quantified Capital Ledger

Ledger item 1: IT08i pedestrian signals

Year: 2025-2026. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Category: transport pedestrian signals. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Project cost: $0.311 million, converted from Council tables expressed in$ 000. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Reserve funding: $0.311 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Confirmed grants or contributions: $0.000 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Unconfirmed grant dependency: $0.000 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Phase meaning: the line is a delivery of pedestrian-signal infrastructure step rather than a complete precinct-wide obligation. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Mechanism: the project converts a DCP or Lockerbie North infrastructure item into a timed capital-work step, so delivery depends on the listed funding source being available in 2025-2026. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Development-feasibility implication: subdivision yield and sales timing must carry the risk that this item is funded through restricted reserves, confirmed contributions, or unconfirmed grant exposure rather than through ordinary rates alone. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging implication: later phases should not be treated as available until prior planning, design, or construction-year lines have occurred. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: this item affects Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Development Contributions Plan, and Mitchell Shire capital sequencing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)

Ledger item 2: C02i community centre planning

Year: 2026-2027. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Category: community centre. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Project cost: $0.249 million, converted from Council tables expressed in$ 000. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Reserve funding: $0.249 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Confirmed grants or contributions: $0.000 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Unconfirmed grant dependency: $0.000 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Phase meaning: the line is a planning step rather than a complete precinct-wide obligation. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Mechanism: the project converts a DCP or Lockerbie North infrastructure item into a timed capital-work step, so delivery depends on the listed funding source being available in 2026-2027. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Development-feasibility implication: subdivision yield and sales timing must carry the risk that this item is funded through restricted reserves, confirmed contributions, or unconfirmed grant exposure rather than through ordinary rates alone. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging implication: later phases should not be treated as available until prior planning, design, or construction-year lines have occurred. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: this item affects Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Development Contributions Plan, and Mitchell Shire capital sequencing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)

Ledger item 3: OS02i sports pavilion design

Year: 2026-2027. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Category: sports pavilion. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Project cost: $0.216 million, converted from Council tables expressed in$ 000. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Reserve funding: $0.216 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Confirmed grants or contributions: $0.000 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Unconfirmed grant dependency: $0.000 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Phase meaning: the line is a design step rather than a complete precinct-wide obligation. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Mechanism: the project converts a DCP or Lockerbie North infrastructure item into a timed capital-work step, so delivery depends on the listed funding source being available in 2026-2027. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Development-feasibility implication: subdivision yield and sales timing must carry the risk that this item is funded through restricted reserves, confirmed contributions, or unconfirmed grant exposure rather than through ordinary rates alone. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging implication: later phases should not be treated as available until prior planning, design, or construction-year lines have occurred. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: this item affects Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Development Contributions Plan, and Mitchell Shire capital sequencing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)

Ledger item 4: OS01i active open space design

Year: 2026-2027. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Category: active open space. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Project cost: $1.053 million, converted from Council tables expressed in$ 000. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Reserve funding: $1.053 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Confirmed grants or contributions: $0.000 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Unconfirmed grant dependency: $0.000 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Phase meaning: the line is a design step rather than a complete precinct-wide obligation. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Mechanism: the project converts a DCP or Lockerbie North infrastructure item into a timed capital-work step, so delivery depends on the listed funding source being available in 2026-2027. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Development-feasibility implication: subdivision yield and sales timing must carry the risk that this item is funded through restricted reserves, confirmed contributions, or unconfirmed grant exposure rather than through ordinary rates alone. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging implication: later phases should not be treated as available until prior planning, design, or construction-year lines have occurred. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: this item affects Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Development Contributions Plan, and Mitchell Shire capital sequencing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)

Ledger item 5: C02ii community centre design and construction year 1

Year: 2027-2028. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Category: community centre. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Project cost: $5.185 million, converted from Council tables expressed in$ 000. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Reserve funding: $5.185 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Confirmed grants or contributions: $0.000 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Unconfirmed grant dependency: $0.000 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Phase meaning: the line is a design and construction year 1 step rather than a complete precinct-wide obligation. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Mechanism: the project converts a DCP or Lockerbie North infrastructure item into a timed capital-work step, so delivery depends on the listed funding source being available in 2027-2028. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Development-feasibility implication: subdivision yield and sales timing must carry the risk that this item is funded through restricted reserves, confirmed contributions, or unconfirmed grant exposure rather than through ordinary rates alone. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging implication: later phases should not be treated as available until prior planning, design, or construction-year lines have occurred. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: this item affects Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Development Contributions Plan, and Mitchell Shire capital sequencing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)

Ledger item 6: OS02ii sports pavilion construction year 1

Year: 2027-2028. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Category: sports pavilion. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Project cost: $0.971 million, converted from Council tables expressed in$ 000. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Reserve funding: $0.971 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Confirmed grants or contributions: $0.000 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Unconfirmed grant dependency: $0.000 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Phase meaning: the line is a construction year 1 step rather than a complete precinct-wide obligation. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Mechanism: the project converts a DCP or Lockerbie North infrastructure item into a timed capital-work step, so delivery depends on the listed funding source being available in 2027-2028. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Development-feasibility implication: subdivision yield and sales timing must carry the risk that this item is funded through restricted reserves, confirmed contributions, or unconfirmed grant exposure rather than through ordinary rates alone. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging implication: later phases should not be treated as available until prior planning, design, or construction-year lines have occurred. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: this item affects Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Development Contributions Plan, and Mitchell Shire capital sequencing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)

Ledger item 7: OS01ii active open space construction year 1

Year: 2027-2028. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Category: active open space. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Project cost: $4.739 million, converted from Council tables expressed in$ 000. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Reserve funding: $4.739 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Confirmed grants or contributions: $0.000 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Unconfirmed grant dependency: $0.000 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Phase meaning: the line is a construction year 1 step rather than a complete precinct-wide obligation. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Mechanism: the project converts a DCP or Lockerbie North infrastructure item into a timed capital-work step, so delivery depends on the listed funding source being available in 2027-2028. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Development-feasibility implication: subdivision yield and sales timing must carry the risk that this item is funded through restricted reserves, confirmed contributions, or unconfirmed grant exposure rather than through ordinary rates alone. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging implication: later phases should not be treated as available until prior planning, design, or construction-year lines have occurred. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: this item affects Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Development Contributions Plan, and Mitchell Shire capital sequencing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)

Ledger item 8: C02iii community centre construction year 2

Year: 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Category: community centre. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Project cost: $20.493 million, converted from Council tables expressed in$ 000. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Reserve funding: $2.144 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Confirmed grants or contributions: $18.349 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Unconfirmed grant dependency: $0.000 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Phase meaning: the line is a construction year 2 step rather than a complete precinct-wide obligation. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Mechanism: the project converts a DCP or Lockerbie North infrastructure item into a timed capital-work step, so delivery depends on the listed funding source being available in 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Development-feasibility implication: subdivision yield and sales timing must carry the risk that this item is funded through restricted reserves, confirmed contributions, or unconfirmed grant exposure rather than through ordinary rates alone. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging implication: later phases should not be treated as available until prior planning, design, or construction-year lines have occurred. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: this item affects Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Development Contributions Plan, and Mitchell Shire capital sequencing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)

Ledger item 9: OS02iii sports pavilion construction year 2

Year: 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Category: sports pavilion. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Project cost: $0.971 million, converted from Council tables expressed in$ 000. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Reserve funding: $0.971 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Confirmed grants or contributions: $0.000 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Unconfirmed grant dependency: $0.000 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Phase meaning: the line is a construction year 2 step rather than a complete precinct-wide obligation. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Mechanism: the project converts a DCP or Lockerbie North infrastructure item into a timed capital-work step, so delivery depends on the listed funding source being available in 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Development-feasibility implication: subdivision yield and sales timing must carry the risk that this item is funded through restricted reserves, confirmed contributions, or unconfirmed grant exposure rather than through ordinary rates alone. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging implication: later phases should not be treated as available until prior planning, design, or construction-year lines have occurred. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: this item affects Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Development Contributions Plan, and Mitchell Shire capital sequencing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)

Ledger item 10: OS01iii active open space construction year 2

Year: 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Category: active open space. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Project cost: $4.739 million, converted from Council tables expressed in$ 000. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Reserve funding: $4.739 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Confirmed grants or contributions: $0.000 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Unconfirmed grant dependency: $0.000 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Phase meaning: the line is a construction year 2 step rather than a complete precinct-wide obligation. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Mechanism: the project converts a DCP or Lockerbie North infrastructure item into a timed capital-work step, so delivery depends on the listed funding source being available in 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Development-feasibility implication: subdivision yield and sales timing must carry the risk that this item is funded through restricted reserves, confirmed contributions, or unconfirmed grant exposure rather than through ordinary rates alone. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging implication: later phases should not be treated as available until prior planning, design, or construction-year lines have occurred. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: this item affects Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Development Contributions Plan, and Mitchell Shire capital sequencing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)

Ledger item 11: C02iv community centre construction year 3

Year: 2029-2030. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Category: community centre. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Project cost: $20.493 million, converted from Council tables expressed in$ 000. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Reserve funding: $2.144 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Confirmed grants or contributions: $18.349 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Unconfirmed grant dependency: $0.000 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Phase meaning: the line is a construction year 3 step rather than a complete precinct-wide obligation. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Mechanism: the project converts a DCP or Lockerbie North infrastructure item into a timed capital-work step, so delivery depends on the listed funding source being available in 2029-2030. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Development-feasibility implication: subdivision yield and sales timing must carry the risk that this item is funded through restricted reserves, confirmed contributions, or unconfirmed grant exposure rather than through ordinary rates alone. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging implication: later phases should not be treated as available until prior planning, design, or construction-year lines have occurred. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: this item affects Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Development Contributions Plan, and Mitchell Shire capital sequencing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)

Ledger item 12: OS04i sports pavilion planning and design year 1

Year: 2029-2030. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Category: sports pavilion. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Project cost: $0.032 million, converted from Council tables expressed in$ 000. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Reserve funding: $0.032 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Confirmed grants or contributions: $0.000 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Unconfirmed grant dependency: $0.000 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Phase meaning: the line is a planning and design year 1 step rather than a complete precinct-wide obligation. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Mechanism: the project converts a DCP or Lockerbie North infrastructure item into a timed capital-work step, so delivery depends on the listed funding source being available in 2029-2030. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Development-feasibility implication: subdivision yield and sales timing must carry the risk that this item is funded through restricted reserves, confirmed contributions, or unconfirmed grant exposure rather than through ordinary rates alone. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging implication: later phases should not be treated as available until prior planning, design, or construction-year lines have occurred. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: this item affects Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Development Contributions Plan, and Mitchell Shire capital sequencing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)

Ledger item 13: OS05i sports pavilion planning and design year 1

Year: 2029-2030. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Category: sports pavilion. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Project cost: $0.025 million, converted from Council tables expressed in$ 000. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Reserve funding: $0.025 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Confirmed grants or contributions: $0.000 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Unconfirmed grant dependency: $0.000 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Phase meaning: the line is a planning and design year 1 step rather than a complete precinct-wide obligation. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Mechanism: the project converts a DCP or Lockerbie North infrastructure item into a timed capital-work step, so delivery depends on the listed funding source being available in 2029-2030. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Development-feasibility implication: subdivision yield and sales timing must carry the risk that this item is funded through restricted reserves, confirmed contributions, or unconfirmed grant exposure rather than through ordinary rates alone. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging implication: later phases should not be treated as available until prior planning, design, or construction-year lines have occurred. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: this item affects Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Development Contributions Plan, and Mitchell Shire capital sequencing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)

Ledger item 14: OS03i active open space planning and design

Year: 2029-2030. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Category: active open space. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Project cost: $0.205 million, converted from Council tables expressed in$ 000. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Reserve funding: $0.205 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Confirmed grants or contributions: $0.000 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Unconfirmed grant dependency: $0.000 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Phase meaning: the line is a planning and design step rather than a complete precinct-wide obligation. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Mechanism: the project converts a DCP or Lockerbie North infrastructure item into a timed capital-work step, so delivery depends on the listed funding source being available in 2029-2030. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Development-feasibility implication: subdivision yield and sales timing must carry the risk that this item is funded through restricted reserves, confirmed contributions, or unconfirmed grant exposure rather than through ordinary rates alone. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging implication: later phases should not be treated as available until prior planning, design, or construction-year lines have occurred. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: this item affects Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Development Contributions Plan, and Mitchell Shire capital sequencing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)

Ledger item 15: C03i community centre planning

Year: 2030-2031. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Category: community centre. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Project cost: $0.295 million, converted from Council tables expressed in$ 000. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Reserve funding: $0.295 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Confirmed grants or contributions: $0.000 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Unconfirmed grant dependency: $0.000 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Phase meaning: the line is a planning step rather than a complete precinct-wide obligation. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Mechanism: the project converts a DCP or Lockerbie North infrastructure item into a timed capital-work step, so delivery depends on the listed funding source being available in 2030-2031. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Development-feasibility implication: subdivision yield and sales timing must carry the risk that this item is funded through restricted reserves, confirmed contributions, or unconfirmed grant exposure rather than through ordinary rates alone. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging implication: later phases should not be treated as available until prior planning, design, or construction-year lines have occurred. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: this item affects Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Development Contributions Plan, and Mitchell Shire capital sequencing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)

Ledger item 16: OS04ii sports pavilion planning and design year 2

Year: 2030-2031. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Category: sports pavilion. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Project cost: $0.302 million, converted from Council tables expressed in$ 000. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Reserve funding: $0.302 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Confirmed grants or contributions: $0.000 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Unconfirmed grant dependency: $0.000 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Phase meaning: the line is a planning and design year 2 step rather than a complete precinct-wide obligation. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Mechanism: the project converts a DCP or Lockerbie North infrastructure item into a timed capital-work step, so delivery depends on the listed funding source being available in 2030-2031. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Development-feasibility implication: subdivision yield and sales timing must carry the risk that this item is funded through restricted reserves, confirmed contributions, or unconfirmed grant exposure rather than through ordinary rates alone. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging implication: later phases should not be treated as available until prior planning, design, or construction-year lines have occurred. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: this item affects Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Development Contributions Plan, and Mitchell Shire capital sequencing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)

Ledger item 17: OS05ii sports pavilion planning and design year 2

Year: 2030-2031. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Category: sports pavilion. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Project cost: $0.229 million, converted from Council tables expressed in$ 000. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Reserve funding: $0.229 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Confirmed grants or contributions: $0.000 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Unconfirmed grant dependency: $0.000 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Phase meaning: the line is a planning and design year 2 step rather than a complete precinct-wide obligation. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Mechanism: the project converts a DCP or Lockerbie North infrastructure item into a timed capital-work step, so delivery depends on the listed funding source being available in 2030-2031. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Development-feasibility implication: subdivision yield and sales timing must carry the risk that this item is funded through restricted reserves, confirmed contributions, or unconfirmed grant exposure rather than through ordinary rates alone. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging implication: later phases should not be treated as available until prior planning, design, or construction-year lines have occurred. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: this item affects Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Development Contributions Plan, and Mitchell Shire capital sequencing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)

Ledger item 18: OS03ii active open space construction year 1

Year: 2030-2031. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Category: active open space. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Project cost: $1.913 million, converted from Council tables expressed in$ 000. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Reserve funding: $1.913 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Confirmed grants or contributions: $0.000 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Unconfirmed grant dependency: $0.000 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Phase meaning: the line is a construction year 1 step rather than a complete precinct-wide obligation. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Mechanism: the project converts a DCP or Lockerbie North infrastructure item into a timed capital-work step, so delivery depends on the listed funding source being available in 2030-2031. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Development-feasibility implication: subdivision yield and sales timing must carry the risk that this item is funded through restricted reserves, confirmed contributions, or unconfirmed grant exposure rather than through ordinary rates alone. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging implication: later phases should not be treated as available until prior planning, design, or construction-year lines have occurred. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: this item affects Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Development Contributions Plan, and Mitchell Shire capital sequencing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)

Ledger item 19: C03ii community centre design

Year: 2031-2032. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Category: community centre. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Project cost: $0.826 million, converted from Council tables expressed in$ 000. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Reserve funding: $0.826 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Confirmed grants or contributions: $0.000 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Unconfirmed grant dependency: $0.000 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Phase meaning: the line is a design step rather than a complete precinct-wide obligation. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Mechanism: the project converts a DCP or Lockerbie North infrastructure item into a timed capital-work step, so delivery depends on the listed funding source being available in 2031-2032. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Development-feasibility implication: subdivision yield and sales timing must carry the risk that this item is funded through restricted reserves, confirmed contributions, or unconfirmed grant exposure rather than through ordinary rates alone. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging implication: later phases should not be treated as available until prior planning, design, or construction-year lines have occurred. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: this item affects Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Development Contributions Plan, and Mitchell Shire capital sequencing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)

Ledger item 20: OS04iii sports pavilion construction year 1

Year: 2031-2032. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Category: sports pavilion. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Project cost: $0.911 million, converted from Council tables expressed in$ 000. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Reserve funding: $0.911 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Confirmed grants or contributions: $0.000 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Unconfirmed grant dependency: $0.000 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Phase meaning: the line is a construction year 1 step rather than a complete precinct-wide obligation. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Mechanism: the project converts a DCP or Lockerbie North infrastructure item into a timed capital-work step, so delivery depends on the listed funding source being available in 2031-2032. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Development-feasibility implication: subdivision yield and sales timing must carry the risk that this item is funded through restricted reserves, confirmed contributions, or unconfirmed grant exposure rather than through ordinary rates alone. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging implication: later phases should not be treated as available until prior planning, design, or construction-year lines have occurred. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: this item affects Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Development Contributions Plan, and Mitchell Shire capital sequencing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)

Ledger item 21: OS05iii sports pavilion construction year 1

Year: 2031-2032. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Category: sports pavilion. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Project cost: $0.692 million, converted from Council tables expressed in$ 000. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Reserve funding: $0.692 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Confirmed grants or contributions: $0.000 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Unconfirmed grant dependency: $0.000 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Phase meaning: the line is a construction year 1 step rather than a complete precinct-wide obligation. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Mechanism: the project converts a DCP or Lockerbie North infrastructure item into a timed capital-work step, so delivery depends on the listed funding source being available in 2031-2032. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Development-feasibility implication: subdivision yield and sales timing must carry the risk that this item is funded through restricted reserves, confirmed contributions, or unconfirmed grant exposure rather than through ordinary rates alone. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging implication: later phases should not be treated as available until prior planning, design, or construction-year lines have occurred. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: this item affects Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Development Contributions Plan, and Mitchell Shire capital sequencing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)

Ledger item 22: OS03iii active open space construction year 1

Year: 2031-2032. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Category: active open space. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Project cost: $8.616 million, converted from Council tables expressed in$ 000. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Reserve funding: $5.773 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Confirmed grants or contributions: $2.843 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Unconfirmed grant dependency: $0.000 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Phase meaning: the line is a construction year 1 step rather than a complete precinct-wide obligation. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Mechanism: the project converts a DCP or Lockerbie North infrastructure item into a timed capital-work step, so delivery depends on the listed funding source being available in 2031-2032. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Development-feasibility implication: subdivision yield and sales timing must carry the risk that this item is funded through restricted reserves, confirmed contributions, or unconfirmed grant exposure rather than through ordinary rates alone. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging implication: later phases should not be treated as available until prior planning, design, or construction-year lines have occurred. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: this item affects Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Development Contributions Plan, and Mitchell Shire capital sequencing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)

Ledger item 23: C03iii community centre construction year 1

Year: 2031-2032. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Category: community centre. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Project cost: $10.247 million, converted from Council tables expressed in$ 000. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Reserve funding: $2.391 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Confirmed grants or contributions: $7.856 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Unconfirmed grant dependency: $0.000 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Phase meaning: the line is a construction year 1 step rather than a complete precinct-wide obligation. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Mechanism: the project converts a DCP or Lockerbie North infrastructure item into a timed capital-work step, so delivery depends on the listed funding source being available in 2031-2032. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Development-feasibility implication: subdivision yield and sales timing must carry the risk that this item is funded through restricted reserves, confirmed contributions, or unconfirmed grant exposure rather than through ordinary rates alone. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging implication: later phases should not be treated as available until prior planning, design, or construction-year lines have occurred. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: this item affects Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Development Contributions Plan, and Mitchell Shire capital sequencing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)

Ledger item 24: OS04iv sports pavilion construction year 2

Year: 2032-2033. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Category: sports pavilion. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Project cost: $0.911 million, converted from Council tables expressed in$ 000. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Reserve funding: $0.911 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Confirmed grants or contributions: $0.000 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Unconfirmed grant dependency: $0.000 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Phase meaning: the line is a construction year 2 step rather than a complete precinct-wide obligation. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Mechanism: the project converts a DCP or Lockerbie North infrastructure item into a timed capital-work step, so delivery depends on the listed funding source being available in 2032-2033. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Development-feasibility implication: subdivision yield and sales timing must carry the risk that this item is funded through restricted reserves, confirmed contributions, or unconfirmed grant exposure rather than through ordinary rates alone. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging implication: later phases should not be treated as available until prior planning, design, or construction-year lines have occurred. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: this item affects Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Development Contributions Plan, and Mitchell Shire capital sequencing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)

Ledger item 25: OS05iv sports pavilion construction year 2

Year: 2032-2033. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Category: sports pavilion. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Project cost: $0.692 million, converted from Council tables expressed in$ 000. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Reserve funding: $0.692 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Confirmed grants or contributions: $0.000 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Unconfirmed grant dependency: $0.000 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Phase meaning: the line is a construction year 2 step rather than a complete precinct-wide obligation. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Mechanism: the project converts a DCP or Lockerbie North infrastructure item into a timed capital-work step, so delivery depends on the listed funding source being available in 2032-2033. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Development-feasibility implication: subdivision yield and sales timing must carry the risk that this item is funded through restricted reserves, confirmed contributions, or unconfirmed grant exposure rather than through ordinary rates alone. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging implication: later phases should not be treated as available until prior planning, design, or construction-year lines have occurred. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: this item affects Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Development Contributions Plan, and Mitchell Shire capital sequencing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)

Ledger item 26: OS03iv active open space construction year 2

Year: 2032-2033. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Category: active open space. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Project cost: $8.616 million, converted from Council tables expressed in$ 000. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Reserve funding: $5.773 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Confirmed grants or contributions: $2.843 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Unconfirmed grant dependency: $0.000 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Phase meaning: the line is a construction year 2 step rather than a complete precinct-wide obligation. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Mechanism: the project converts a DCP or Lockerbie North infrastructure item into a timed capital-work step, so delivery depends on the listed funding source being available in 2032-2033. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Development-feasibility implication: subdivision yield and sales timing must carry the risk that this item is funded through restricted reserves, confirmed contributions, or unconfirmed grant exposure rather than through ordinary rates alone. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging implication: later phases should not be treated as available until prior planning, design, or construction-year lines have occurred. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: this item affects Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Development Contributions Plan, and Mitchell Shire capital sequencing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)

Ledger item 27: C03iv community centre construction year 2

Year: 2033-2034. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Category: community centre. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Project cost: $10.247 million, converted from Council tables expressed in$ 000. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Reserve funding: $2.391 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Confirmed grants or contributions: $7.856 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Unconfirmed grant dependency: $0.000 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Phase meaning: the line is a construction year 2 step rather than a complete precinct-wide obligation. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Mechanism: the project converts a DCP or Lockerbie North infrastructure item into a timed capital-work step, so delivery depends on the listed funding source being available in 2033-2034. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Development-feasibility implication: subdivision yield and sales timing must carry the risk that this item is funded through restricted reserves, confirmed contributions, or unconfirmed grant exposure rather than through ordinary rates alone. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging implication: later phases should not be treated as available until prior planning, design, or construction-year lines have occurred. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: this item affects Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Development Contributions Plan, and Mitchell Shire capital sequencing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)

Ledger item 28: Indoor Recreation (F) pre-planning

Year: 2026-2027. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Category: indoor recreation. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Project cost: $0.155 million, converted from Council tables expressed in$ 000. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Reserve funding: $0.000 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Confirmed grants or contributions: $0.000 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Unconfirmed grant dependency: $0.155 million. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Phase meaning: the line is a pre-planning step rather than a complete precinct-wide obligation. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Mechanism: the project converts a DCP or Lockerbie North infrastructure item into a timed capital-work step, so delivery depends on the listed funding source being available in 2026-2027. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Development-feasibility implication: subdivision yield and sales timing must carry the risk that this item is funded through restricted reserves, confirmed contributions, or unconfirmed grant exposure rather than through ordinary rates alone. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging implication: later phases should not be treated as available until prior planning, design, or construction-year lines have occurred. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-reference: this item affects Lockerbie North Precinct Structure Plan, Development Contributions Plan, and Mitchell Shire capital sequencing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)

Category Totals

active open space: $29.881 million total,$ 24.195 million reserves, $5.686 million confirmed grants or contributions, and$ 0.000 million unconfirmed grant dependency. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
community centre: $68.035 million total,$ 15.625 million reserves, $52.410 million confirmed grants or contributions, and$ 0.000 million unconfirmed grant dependency. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
indoor recreation: $0.155 million total,$ 0.000 million reserves, $0.000 million confirmed grants or contributions, and$ 0.155 million unconfirmed grant dependency. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
sports pavilion: $5.952 million total,$ 5.952 million reserves, $0.000 million confirmed grants or contributions, and$ 0.000 million unconfirmed grant dependency. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
transport pedestrian signals: $0.311 million total,$ 0.311 million reserves, $0.000 million confirmed grants or contributions, and$ 0.000 million unconfirmed grant dependency. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)

Mechanism Map

Urban-growth sequencing: the Wallan Regional Park feasibility report describes PSPs as the primary mechanism for designating future land uses in growth areas such as Wallan-Beveridge, including subdivision form and long-term development guidance. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Infrastructure-plan coupling: the same report states that PSPs include provision of land or funds for public infrastructure under an Infrastructure Contributions Plan for each PSP area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Completed-PSP lock-in: once a PSP is complete, the report says there is no longer the opportunity to acquire land through that PSP process, so alternative compulsory acquisition would be required. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Open-space land take: a 9.15% public-open-space contribution removes part of the Net Developable Area from saleable development and converts it into public active and passive open space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Active-open-space intensity: 17.5 hectares across two reserves creates a dual-reserve sports network rather than a single oval, which changes maintenance, pavilion, lighting, parking, and school-interface requirements. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Co-location mechanism: the 8.0 hectare reserve is tied to an indoor recreation facility and a state primary/secondary school, so its feasibility depends on school-site and indoor-recreation staging as well as reserve construction. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Education interface: the 9.5 hectare reserve is tied to a state primary school and potential non-government school, so shared access, traffic peaks, and safety interfaces become development-sequencing issues. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Cross-precinct service sharing: Donnybrook, Lockerbie, and Lockerbie North are expected to share facilities and services, which makes railway-line resolution a practical condition of service equity. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
DCP cash-flow mechanism: the budget says contributions are collected as development proceeds, so early works may occur before all liable land has paid its share. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Restricted-reserve mechanism: the financial plan says developer contributions are transferred to restricted reserves until used for specific capital-works purposes. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Works-in-kind mechanism: the financial plan distinguishes gifted assets from infrastructure delivered by developers as works-in-kind agreed before Council receives contributions and delivers works itself. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Funding-gap mechanism: the budget says development contributions rarely provide sufficient funding for identified infrastructure, which creates a structural gap between DCP schedules and actual delivery costs. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Market-timing mechanism: the budget says development contributions and infrastructure funding depend on market conditions and development timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Grant-risk mechanism: the indoor recreation pre-planning line is $0.155 million and is listed as unconfirmed grant dependent, so it is not equivalent to a fully funded project. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Regional-park exclusion mechanism: Lockerbie North is outside the WRP study area and has no major natural assets identified for WRP inclusion, so its regional-open-space role is indirect rather than land-supply based. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Landscape-context mechanism: Mount Fraser being outside the Lockerbie North PSP means volcanic-cone protection and interpretation sit in adjacent precinct and regional-park planning rather than inside Lockerbie North land budgets. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Beveridge-service mechanism: Beveridge Central defers tennis provision to Lockerbie North facilities, which means Lockerbie North tennis delivery affects Beveridge Central service adequacy. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Sports-demand mechanism: Beveridge Central calculates 42 cricket teams and 88 soccer teams in 2024, so active-open-space delivery is driven by participation conversion, not only population totals. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Facility-capacity mechanism: the benchmark of six to seven cricket teams per oval and seven to eight soccer teams per pitch translates participation counts into land and field requirements. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Capital-stage mechanism: planning, design, construction year 1, construction year 2, and construction year 3 lines show that a DCP item becomes useful only after a multi-year project lifecycle. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)

Staging Sequence

2012: Lockerbie North is treated as a completed PSP in the Wallan Regional Park feasibility table. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
2013: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies Mount Fraser as outside the Lockerbie North PSP and identifies southern-growth-area regional-park opportunities. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
2014: The Sports Field Feasibility Study identifies Lockerbie and Lockerbie North as the two approved PSPs affecting parts of Mitchell Shire in this growth area. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
2014: The Sports Field Feasibility Study records Lockerbie North public open space at 9.15% of Net Developable Area. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
2014: The Sports Field Feasibility Study records 17.5 hectares of active playing space in Lockerbie North. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
2022: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work states that Lockerbie North is approved, south of Mount Fraser, and outside the WRP study area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
2024: Beveridge Central AOS uses estimated 2024 Beveridge population of 9,120 to calculate current sport demand. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
2025-2026: Council schedules $0.311 million for Lockerbie North IT08i pedestrian signals. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
2026-2027: Council schedules $0.249 million for Lockerbie North C02i community centre planning. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
2026-2027: Council schedules $0.216 million for Lockerbie North OS02i sports pavilion design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
2026-2027: Council schedules $1.053 million for Lockerbie North OS01i active open space design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
2027-2028: Council schedules $5.185 million for Lockerbie North C02ii community centre design and construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
2027-2028: Council schedules $0.971 million for Lockerbie North OS02ii sports pavilion construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
2027-2028: Council schedules $4.739 million for Lockerbie North OS01ii active open space construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
2028-2029: Council schedules $20.493 million for Lockerbie North C02iii community centre construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
2028-2029: Council schedules $0.971 million for Lockerbie North OS02iii sports pavilion construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
2028-2029: Council schedules $4.739 million for Lockerbie North OS01iii active open space construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
2029-2030: Council schedules $20.493 million for Lockerbie North C02iv community centre construction year 3. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
2029-2030: Council schedules $0.032 million for Lockerbie North OS04i sports pavilion planning and design year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
2029-2030: Council schedules $0.025 million for Lockerbie North OS05i sports pavilion planning and design year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
2029-2030: Council schedules $0.205 million for Lockerbie North OS03i active open space planning and design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
2030-2031: Council schedules $0.295 million for Lockerbie North C03i community centre planning. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
2030-2031: Council schedules $0.302 million for Lockerbie North OS04ii sports pavilion planning and design year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
2030-2031: Council schedules $0.229 million for Lockerbie North OS05ii sports pavilion planning and design year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
2030-2031: Council schedules $1.913 million for Lockerbie North OS03ii active open space construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
2031-2032: Council schedules $0.826 million for Lockerbie North C03ii community centre design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
2031-2032: Council schedules $0.911 million for Lockerbie North OS04iii sports pavilion construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
2031-2032: Council schedules $0.692 million for Lockerbie North OS05iii sports pavilion construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
2031-2032: Council schedules $8.616 million for Lockerbie North OS03iii active open space construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
2031-2032: Council schedules $10.247 million for Lockerbie North C03iii community centre construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
2032-2033: Council schedules $0.911 million for Lockerbie North OS04iv sports pavilion construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
2032-2033: Council schedules $0.692 million for Lockerbie North OS05iv sports pavilion construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
2032-2033: Council schedules $8.616 million for Lockerbie North OS03iv active open space construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
2033-2034: Council schedules $10.247 million for Lockerbie North C03iv community centre construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
2026-2027: Council schedules $0.155 million for Lockerbie North Indoor Recreation (F) pre-planning. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)

Development Feasibility Implications

Gross-to-net feasibility must subtract the 9.15% public-open-space contribution from Net Developable Area assumptions before residual land-value testing. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
The 5.9% active-open-space component is not interchangeable with passive open space because it must accommodate sports fields, courts, pavilions, lighting, and high-use turf or synthetic-surface decisions. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
The 3.24% passive-open-space component matters for walkability and neighbourhood amenity but does not by itself satisfy the 17.5 hectare active-playing-space program. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Because the 8.0 hectare reserve is co-located with an indoor recreation facility and a school, delivery risk includes education-land timing and indoor-recreation funding risk. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Because the 9.5 hectare reserve is co-located with schools and court-based sport, feasibility includes peak traffic, safe access, car parking, lighting spill, and shared-use governance. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
The $104.334 million Lockerbie North ledger shows that development feasibility is exposed to municipal capital timing as well as private subdivision timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
The $58.096 million confirmed-contribution component reduces but does not eliminate delivery risk because confirmed contributions still have to arrive on the schedule assumed by Council. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
The $46.083 million reserve-funded component depends on restricted reserves being sufficient and available for the specific project purposes. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
The $0.155 million indoor recreation pre-planning item is a small dollar amount relative to the ledger but a large dependency signal because it is fully unconfirmed grant dependent. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
The budget warning that development contributions rarely fully fund identified infrastructure means DCP feasibility should include escalation and funding-gap sensitivity tests. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
The budget warning that market conditions affect contribution flows means slower lot sales can delay infrastructure that later residents still need. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
The financial-plan expectation of $93.66 million in 2026-2027 works-in-kind across several growth areas means developer capacity and agreement timing are material to Council-wide delivery. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
The Beveridge Central reliance on Lockerbie North tennis facilities means delay in Lockerbie North courts can produce service deficits outside the Lockerbie North boundary. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
The projected Beveridge growth to 112,187 people by 2046 means active-open-space under-delivery compounds across a much larger future catchment than the 2024 population of 9,120. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
The 2024 demand estimate of 42 cricket teams and 88 soccer teams means field demand is already measurable before the full 2046 population is reached. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
The railway-line barrier between Donnybrook, Lockerbie, and Lockerbie North means cross-boundary service sharing is only feasible if physical access is resolved. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Lockerbie North being outside the Wallan Regional Park study area means developers should not assume future regional-park land acquisition will directly offset local open-space obligations. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Mount Fraser being outside Lockerbie North means the precinct cannot claim Mount Fraser as an internal open-space asset even though it shapes the broader landscape identity. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
The completed status of Lockerbie North reduces planning uncertainty but increases the importance of the approved DCP, because later additions to regional open space would generally require purchase or another acquisition mechanism. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
The absence of the primary PSP and DCP documents in the local corpus prevents verification of charge areas, dwelling yield, road hierarchy, drainage obligations, and parcel-specific staging. (Source: local corpus inventory)

Contested Issues And Evidence Limits

No primary submissions on the Lockerbie North PSP were located in the requested extracted Mitchell corpus. (Source: local corpus inventory)
No planning panel report for Lockerbie North was located in the requested extracted Mitchell corpus. (Source: local corpus inventory)
No advisory committee report specific to Lockerbie North was located in the requested extracted Mitchell corpus. (Source: local corpus inventory)
No primary DCP charge table for Lockerbie North was located in the requested extracted Mitchell corpus. (Source: local corpus inventory)
The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work records contested quarry issues in nearby precincts, including proposed quarry impacts around Spring Hill, but not inside the completed Lockerbie North PSP. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work states that the completed Lockerbie North PSP did not reference the future WRP, which creates a policy coordination issue rather than a submission issue in the available corpus. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
The Beveridge Central master plan shows a facility-program shift from tennis at Beveridge Central toward small-sided soccer, with tennis provision relying on Lockerbie North active open spaces. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
The sports-field study and Beveridge Central master plan describe different southern Lockerbie North reserve mixes, so the final statutory reserve program requires primary PSP or later Council confirmation. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
The 9.15% total open-space rate and 5.9% plus 3.24% component rates contain a 0.01 percentage-point arithmetic discrepancy, so downstream calculations should use the published total unless the primary DCP confirms otherwise. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
The budget states that development-contribution funding depends on market timing, so the capital ledger should be read as a programmed sequence rather than a guarantee of actual completion dates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
The financial plan separates confirmed and unconfirmed grants or contributions, so items with unconfirmed funding should not be treated as fully funded. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
The local corpus contains duplicate-named extracts for the Wallan Regional Park feasibility report and the Mitchell sports-field feasibility study, so duplicate evidence should not be double counted. (Source: local filesystem inventory)

Detailed Fact Register

Land-use reading

Land-use reading: Lockerbie North is listed by the Wallan Regional Park feasibility work as a completed PSP, with the PSP dated 2012 in the completed-precinct table. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Land-use reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility table states that Lockerbie North is south of Mount Fraser and outside the Wallan Regional Park study area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Land-use reading: The same feasibility table states that Lockerbie North does not contain major natural assets that would lend themselves to incorporation in the Wallan Regional Park. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Land-use reading: The same feasibility table states that 27 hectares of active and passive open space is included in the Lockerbie North PSP. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Land-use reading: The same feasibility table states that the approved Lockerbie North PSP does not reference the future Wallan Regional Park. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Land-use reading: Lockerbie North has a total public-open-space contribution of 9.15% of Net Developable Area. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Land-use reading: The Lockerbie North public-open-space contribution is split into 5.9% active open space and 3.24% passive open space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Land-use reading: The published active and passive components sum to 9.14%, which is 0.01 percentage points below the published total of 9.15%, so the available source contains a rounding discrepancy. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Land-use reading: Lockerbie PSP is a useful comparator because it has an 8.33% public-open-space contribution, split into 6.30% active open space and 2.03% passive open space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Land-use reading: Lockerbie North therefore has a 0.82 percentage-point higher total open-space contribution than Lockerbie PSP. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Land-use reading: Lockerbie North has a 0.40 percentage-point lower active-open-space component than Lockerbie PSP. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Land-use reading: Lockerbie North has a 1.21 percentage-point higher passive-open-space component than Lockerbie PSP. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Land-use reading: Lockerbie North includes 17.5 hectares of active playing space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Land-use reading: The 17.5 hectares of active playing space is made up of one 8.0 hectare reserve and one 9.5 hectare reserve. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Land-use reading: The 8.0 hectare reserve includes two full-size Australian Rules football and cricket ovals, cricket nets, and a playground. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Land-use reading: The 8.0 hectare reserve is to be located with an indoor recreation facility and a state primary/secondary school. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Land-use reading: The 9.5 hectare southern reserve includes either two full-size Australian Rules football and cricket ovals or three full-size soccer fields. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Land-use reading: The 9.5 hectare southern reserve includes cricket nets, six tennis courts, two netball courts, and a playground. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Land-use reading: The 9.5 hectare southern reserve is co-located with a state primary school and a potential non-government school. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Land-use reading: The Beveridge Central Active Open Space Master Plan describes the adjacent Lockerbie North PSP northern active open space as 8.0 hectares with two ovals, six tennis courts, and two netball or tennis courts. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Land-use reading: The Beveridge Central Active Open Space Master Plan describes the Lockerbie North PSP southern active open space as 9.5 hectares with two ovals, two overlaid rectangular pitches, one athletics track, and six tennis courts. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Land-use reading: The later Beveridge Central evidence changes the southern reserve emphasis from three full-size soccer fields to two overlaid rectangular pitches plus one athletics track. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Land-use reading: Beveridge Central AOS is planned for soccer and cricket, while tennis demand is expected to be served in coming years by the two active open spaces in the adjacent Lockerbie North PSP. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Land-use reading: Beveridge had an estimated 2024 population of 9,120 and is forecast to exceed 112,000 people by 2046. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Land-use reading: The Beveridge Central demand table estimates 639 cricket participants in 2024, equivalent to 42 cricket teams. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Land-use reading: The Beveridge Central demand table estimates 1,322 soccer participants in 2024, equivalent to 88 soccer teams. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Land-use reading: The same demand table translates 42 cricket teams into six cricket ovals using a six-to-seven-team-per-oval benchmark. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Land-use reading: The same demand table translates 88 soccer teams into 11 soccer pitches using a seven-to-eight-team-per-pitch benchmark. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Land-use reading: Donnybrook PSP is expected to join future Lockerbie and Lockerbie North developments, and residents are expected to share facilities and services across council boundaries. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Land-use reading: The existing railway line is identified as a physical barrier that will need to be resolved for shared facilities and services. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Land-use reading: Mitchell Shire had more than 64,000 residents in the 2025-2026 budget context and expects more than 221,000 residents by 2046. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Land-use reading: Mitchell Shire expects continued growth beyond 2046 toward 250,000 residents. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Land-use reading: The budget forecasts population growth of 7.34% in 2025-2026, 7.47% in 2026-2027, 7.16% in 2027-2028, and 7.12% in 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Land-use reading: The financial plan forecasts developer contributions of $27.056 million in 2025-2026,$ 27.524 million in 2026-2027, $30.047 million in 2027-2028, and$ 19.367 million in 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Land-use reading: The budget forecasts non-monetary contributions of $60.859 million in 2025-2026,$ 123.668 million in 2026-2027, $59.247 million in 2027-2028, and$ 68.419 million in 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Land-use reading: The financial plan says non-monetary asset handovers are forecast at $28.00 million in 2025-2026 and increase by$ 2.00 million each year until reaching $40.00 million in 2031-2032. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Land-use reading: The financial plan attributes the 2026-2027 non-monetary contribution spike to $93.66 million of anticipated developer-delivered works-in-kind, predominantly in Beveridge Central, Beveridge North West, Kilmore South East, Lockerbie, and Lockerbie North. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Land-use reading: The budget states that development contributions are collected as development proceeds. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Land-use reading: The budget states that development-contribution flows create cash-flow challenges for Council. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Land-use reading: The budget identifies borrowings, partnerships, works-in-kind processes, and grant advocacy as mitigation measures for development-contribution cash-flow challenges. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Land-use reading: The budget states that development contributions rarely provide sufficient funding for the infrastructure identified. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Land-use reading: The budget states that delays between contribution collection and infrastructure delivery can exacerbate the infrastructure funding gap. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Land-use reading: The budget states that development contributions and infrastructure funding depend on market conditions and development timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Land-use reading: The financial plan says developer contributions are transferred to restricted reserves until used for specific capital-works purposes. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Land-use reading: The financial plan says developer contributions often require Council to outlay funds before receiving developer contributions. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Land-use reading: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies Mount Fraser as outside the Lockerbie North PSP. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Land-use reading: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies Bald Hill as within the Lockerbie PSP area, not the Lockerbie North PSP area. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Land-use reading: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies volcanic cones including Bald Hill, Mount Fraser, Spring Hill, and Green Hill as regional open-space elements in the southern growth area. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Land-use reading: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies Hernes Swamp as part of the potential southern-growth-area regional park system. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Land-use reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work says completed PSPs such as Lockerbie North cannot use the PSP process to acquire additional Wallan Regional Park land without purchase or another mechanism. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Land-use reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work says land for the future regional park should be identified in PSPs and transferred under ICPs where possible to avoid purchase. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Land-use reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work identifies Public Acquisition Overlays as a mechanism for land not transferable under a PSP or ICP. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Land-use reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work identifies GAIC works-in-kind agreements as a possible mechanism for regional or state-level public purposes. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Land-use reading: Urban-growth sequencing: the Wallan Regional Park feasibility report describes PSPs as the primary mechanism for designating future land uses in growth areas such as Wallan-Beveridge, including subdivision form and long-term development guidance. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Land-use reading: Infrastructure-plan coupling: the same report states that PSPs include provision of land or funds for public infrastructure under an Infrastructure Contributions Plan for each PSP area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Land-use reading: Completed-PSP lock-in: once a PSP is complete, the report says there is no longer the opportunity to acquire land through that PSP process, so alternative compulsory acquisition would be required. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Land-use reading: Open-space land take: a 9.15% public-open-space contribution removes part of the Net Developable Area from saleable development and converts it into public active and passive open space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Land-use reading: Active-open-space intensity: 17.5 hectares across two reserves creates a dual-reserve sports network rather than a single oval, which changes maintenance, pavilion, lighting, parking, and school-interface requirements. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Land-use reading: Co-location mechanism: the 8.0 hectare reserve is tied to an indoor recreation facility and a state primary/secondary school, so its feasibility depends on school-site and indoor-recreation staging as well as reserve construction. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Land-use reading: Education interface: the 9.5 hectare reserve is tied to a state primary school and potential non-government school, so shared access, traffic peaks, and safety interfaces become development-sequencing issues. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Land-use reading: Cross-precinct service sharing: Donnybrook, Lockerbie, and Lockerbie North are expected to share facilities and services, which makes railway-line resolution a practical condition of service equity. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Land-use reading: DCP cash-flow mechanism: the budget says contributions are collected as development proceeds, so early works may occur before all liable land has paid its share. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Land-use reading: Restricted-reserve mechanism: the financial plan says developer contributions are transferred to restricted reserves until used for specific capital-works purposes. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Land-use reading: Works-in-kind mechanism: the financial plan distinguishes gifted assets from infrastructure delivered by developers as works-in-kind agreed before Council receives contributions and delivers works itself. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Land-use reading: Funding-gap mechanism: the budget says development contributions rarely provide sufficient funding for identified infrastructure, which creates a structural gap between DCP schedules and actual delivery costs. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Land-use reading: Market-timing mechanism: the budget says development contributions and infrastructure funding depend on market conditions and development timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Land-use reading: Grant-risk mechanism: the indoor recreation pre-planning line is $0.155 million and is listed as unconfirmed grant dependent, so it is not equivalent to a fully funded project. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Land-use reading: Regional-park exclusion mechanism: Lockerbie North is outside the WRP study area and has no major natural assets identified for WRP inclusion, so its regional-open-space role is indirect rather than land-supply based. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Land-use reading: Landscape-context mechanism: Mount Fraser being outside the Lockerbie North PSP means volcanic-cone protection and interpretation sit in adjacent precinct and regional-park planning rather than inside Lockerbie North land budgets. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Land-use reading: Beveridge-service mechanism: Beveridge Central defers tennis provision to Lockerbie North facilities, which means Lockerbie North tennis delivery affects Beveridge Central service adequacy. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Land-use reading: Sports-demand mechanism: Beveridge Central calculates 42 cricket teams and 88 soccer teams in 2024, so active-open-space delivery is driven by participation conversion, not only population totals. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Land-use reading: Facility-capacity mechanism: the benchmark of six to seven cricket teams per oval and seven to eight soccer teams per pitch translates participation counts into land and field requirements. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Land-use reading: Capital-stage mechanism: planning, design, construction year 1, construction year 2, and construction year 3 lines show that a DCP item becomes useful only after a multi-year project lifecycle. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Land-use reading: 2012: Lockerbie North is treated as a completed PSP in the Wallan Regional Park feasibility table. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Land-use reading: 2013: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies Mount Fraser as outside the Lockerbie North PSP and identifies southern-growth-area regional-park opportunities. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Land-use reading: 2014: The Sports Field Feasibility Study identifies Lockerbie and Lockerbie North as the two approved PSPs affecting parts of Mitchell Shire in this growth area. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Land-use reading: 2014: The Sports Field Feasibility Study records Lockerbie North public open space at 9.15% of Net Developable Area. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Land-use reading: 2014: The Sports Field Feasibility Study records 17.5 hectares of active playing space in Lockerbie North. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Land-use reading: 2022: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work states that Lockerbie North is approved, south of Mount Fraser, and outside the WRP study area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Land-use reading: 2024: Beveridge Central AOS uses estimated 2024 Beveridge population of 9,120 to calculate current sport demand. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Land-use reading: 2025-2026: Council schedules $0.311 million for Lockerbie North IT08i pedestrian signals. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Land-use reading: 2026-2027: Council schedules $0.249 million for Lockerbie North C02i community centre planning. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Land-use reading: 2026-2027: Council schedules $0.216 million for Lockerbie North OS02i sports pavilion design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Land-use reading: 2026-2027: Council schedules $1.053 million for Lockerbie North OS01i active open space design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Land-use reading: 2027-2028: Council schedules $5.185 million for Lockerbie North C02ii community centre design and construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Land-use reading: 2027-2028: Council schedules $0.971 million for Lockerbie North OS02ii sports pavilion construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Land-use reading: 2027-2028: Council schedules $4.739 million for Lockerbie North OS01ii active open space construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Land-use reading: 2028-2029: Council schedules $20.493 million for Lockerbie North C02iii community centre construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Land-use reading: 2028-2029: Council schedules $0.971 million for Lockerbie North OS02iii sports pavilion construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Land-use reading: 2028-2029: Council schedules $4.739 million for Lockerbie North OS01iii active open space construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Land-use reading: 2029-2030: Council schedules $20.493 million for Lockerbie North C02iv community centre construction year 3. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Land-use reading: 2029-2030: Council schedules $0.032 million for Lockerbie North OS04i sports pavilion planning and design year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Land-use reading: 2029-2030: Council schedules $0.025 million for Lockerbie North OS05i sports pavilion planning and design year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Land-use reading: 2029-2030: Council schedules $0.205 million for Lockerbie North OS03i active open space planning and design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Land-use reading: 2030-2031: Council schedules $0.295 million for Lockerbie North C03i community centre planning. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Land-use reading: 2030-2031: Council schedules $0.302 million for Lockerbie North OS04ii sports pavilion planning and design year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Land-use reading: 2030-2031: Council schedules $0.229 million for Lockerbie North OS05ii sports pavilion planning and design year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Land-use reading: 2030-2031: Council schedules $1.913 million for Lockerbie North OS03ii active open space construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Land-use reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $0.826 million for Lockerbie North C03ii community centre design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Land-use reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $0.911 million for Lockerbie North OS04iii sports pavilion construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Land-use reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $0.692 million for Lockerbie North OS05iii sports pavilion construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Land-use reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $8.616 million for Lockerbie North OS03iii active open space construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Land-use reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $10.247 million for Lockerbie North C03iii community centre construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Land-use reading: 2032-2033: Council schedules $0.911 million for Lockerbie North OS04iv sports pavilion construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Land-use reading: 2032-2033: Council schedules $0.692 million for Lockerbie North OS05iv sports pavilion construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Land-use reading: 2032-2033: Council schedules $8.616 million for Lockerbie North OS03iv active open space construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Land-use reading: 2033-2034: Council schedules $10.247 million for Lockerbie North C03iv community centre construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Land-use reading: 2026-2027: Council schedules $0.155 million for Lockerbie North Indoor Recreation (F) pre-planning. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Land-use reading: Gross-to-net feasibility must subtract the 9.15% public-open-space contribution from Net Developable Area assumptions before residual land-value testing. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Land-use reading: The 5.9% active-open-space component is not interchangeable with passive open space because it must accommodate sports fields, courts, pavilions, lighting, and high-use turf or synthetic-surface decisions. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Land-use reading: The 3.24% passive-open-space component matters for walkability and neighbourhood amenity but does not by itself satisfy the 17.5 hectare active-playing-space program. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Land-use reading: Because the 8.0 hectare reserve is co-located with an indoor recreation facility and a school, delivery risk includes education-land timing and indoor-recreation funding risk. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Land-use reading: Because the 9.5 hectare reserve is co-located with schools and court-based sport, feasibility includes peak traffic, safe access, car parking, lighting spill, and shared-use governance. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Land-use reading: The $104.334 million Lockerbie North ledger shows that development feasibility is exposed to municipal capital timing as well as private subdivision timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Land-use reading: The $58.096 million confirmed-contribution component reduces but does not eliminate delivery risk because confirmed contributions still have to arrive on the schedule assumed by Council. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Land-use reading: The $46.083 million reserve-funded component depends on restricted reserves being sufficient and available for the specific project purposes. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Land-use reading: The $0.155 million indoor recreation pre-planning item is a small dollar amount relative to the ledger but a large dependency signal because it is fully unconfirmed grant dependent. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Land-use reading: The budget warning that development contributions rarely fully fund identified infrastructure means DCP feasibility should include escalation and funding-gap sensitivity tests. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Land-use reading: The budget warning that market conditions affect contribution flows means slower lot sales can delay infrastructure that later residents still need. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Land-use reading: The financial-plan expectation of $93.66 million in 2026-2027 works-in-kind across several growth areas means developer capacity and agreement timing are material to Council-wide delivery. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Land-use reading: The Beveridge Central reliance on Lockerbie North tennis facilities means delay in Lockerbie North courts can produce service deficits outside the Lockerbie North boundary. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Land-use reading: The projected Beveridge growth to 112,187 people by 2046 means active-open-space under-delivery compounds across a much larger future catchment than the 2024 population of 9,120. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Land-use reading: The 2024 demand estimate of 42 cricket teams and 88 soccer teams means field demand is already measurable before the full 2046 population is reached. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Land-use reading: The railway-line barrier between Donnybrook, Lockerbie, and Lockerbie North means cross-boundary service sharing is only feasible if physical access is resolved. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Land-use reading: Lockerbie North being outside the Wallan Regional Park study area means developers should not assume future regional-park land acquisition will directly offset local open-space obligations. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Land-use reading: Mount Fraser being outside Lockerbie North means the precinct cannot claim Mount Fraser as an internal open-space asset even though it shapes the broader landscape identity. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Land-use reading: The completed status of Lockerbie North reduces planning uncertainty but increases the importance of the approved DCP, because later additions to regional open space would generally require purchase or another acquisition mechanism. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Land-use reading: The absence of the primary PSP and DCP documents in the local corpus prevents verification of charge areas, dwelling yield, road hierarchy, drainage obligations, and parcel-specific staging. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Land-use reading: No primary submissions on the Lockerbie North PSP were located in the requested extracted Mitchell corpus. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Land-use reading: No planning panel report for Lockerbie North was located in the requested extracted Mitchell corpus. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Land-use reading: No advisory committee report specific to Lockerbie North was located in the requested extracted Mitchell corpus. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Land-use reading: No primary DCP charge table for Lockerbie North was located in the requested extracted Mitchell corpus. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Land-use reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work records contested quarry issues in nearby precincts, including proposed quarry impacts around Spring Hill, but not inside the completed Lockerbie North PSP. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Land-use reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work states that the completed Lockerbie North PSP did not reference the future WRP, which creates a policy coordination issue rather than a submission issue in the available corpus. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Land-use reading: The Beveridge Central master plan shows a facility-program shift from tennis at Beveridge Central toward small-sided soccer, with tennis provision relying on Lockerbie North active open spaces. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Land-use reading: The sports-field study and Beveridge Central master plan describe different southern Lockerbie North reserve mixes, so the final statutory reserve program requires primary PSP or later Council confirmation. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Land-use reading: The 9.15% total open-space rate and 5.9% plus 3.24% component rates contain a 0.01 percentage-point arithmetic discrepancy, so downstream calculations should use the published total unless the primary DCP confirms otherwise. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Land-use reading: The budget states that development-contribution funding depends on market timing, so the capital ledger should be read as a programmed sequence rather than a guarantee of actual completion dates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Land-use reading: The financial plan separates confirmed and unconfirmed grants or contributions, so items with unconfirmed funding should not be treated as fully funded. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Land-use reading: The local corpus contains duplicate-named extracts for the Wallan Regional Park feasibility report and the Mitchell sports-field feasibility study, so duplicate evidence should not be double counted. (Source: local filesystem inventory)

Infrastructure reading

Infrastructure reading: Lockerbie North is listed by the Wallan Regional Park feasibility work as a completed PSP, with the PSP dated 2012 in the completed-precinct table. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility table states that Lockerbie North is south of Mount Fraser and outside the Wallan Regional Park study area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The same feasibility table states that Lockerbie North does not contain major natural assets that would lend themselves to incorporation in the Wallan Regional Park. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The same feasibility table states that 27 hectares of active and passive open space is included in the Lockerbie North PSP. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The same feasibility table states that the approved Lockerbie North PSP does not reference the future Wallan Regional Park. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Infrastructure reading: Lockerbie North has a total public-open-space contribution of 9.15% of Net Developable Area. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The Lockerbie North public-open-space contribution is split into 5.9% active open space and 3.24% passive open space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The published active and passive components sum to 9.14%, which is 0.01 percentage points below the published total of 9.15%, so the available source contains a rounding discrepancy. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Infrastructure reading: Lockerbie PSP is a useful comparator because it has an 8.33% public-open-space contribution, split into 6.30% active open space and 2.03% passive open space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Infrastructure reading: Lockerbie North therefore has a 0.82 percentage-point higher total open-space contribution than Lockerbie PSP. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Infrastructure reading: Lockerbie North has a 0.40 percentage-point lower active-open-space component than Lockerbie PSP. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Infrastructure reading: Lockerbie North has a 1.21 percentage-point higher passive-open-space component than Lockerbie PSP. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Infrastructure reading: Lockerbie North includes 17.5 hectares of active playing space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The 17.5 hectares of active playing space is made up of one 8.0 hectare reserve and one 9.5 hectare reserve. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The 8.0 hectare reserve includes two full-size Australian Rules football and cricket ovals, cricket nets, and a playground. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The 8.0 hectare reserve is to be located with an indoor recreation facility and a state primary/secondary school. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The 9.5 hectare southern reserve includes either two full-size Australian Rules football and cricket ovals or three full-size soccer fields. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The 9.5 hectare southern reserve includes cricket nets, six tennis courts, two netball courts, and a playground. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The 9.5 hectare southern reserve is co-located with a state primary school and a potential non-government school. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The Beveridge Central Active Open Space Master Plan describes the adjacent Lockerbie North PSP northern active open space as 8.0 hectares with two ovals, six tennis courts, and two netball or tennis courts. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The Beveridge Central Active Open Space Master Plan describes the Lockerbie North PSP southern active open space as 9.5 hectares with two ovals, two overlaid rectangular pitches, one athletics track, and six tennis courts. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The later Beveridge Central evidence changes the southern reserve emphasis from three full-size soccer fields to two overlaid rectangular pitches plus one athletics track. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Infrastructure reading: Beveridge Central AOS is planned for soccer and cricket, while tennis demand is expected to be served in coming years by the two active open spaces in the adjacent Lockerbie North PSP. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Infrastructure reading: Beveridge had an estimated 2024 population of 9,120 and is forecast to exceed 112,000 people by 2046. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The Beveridge Central demand table estimates 639 cricket participants in 2024, equivalent to 42 cricket teams. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The Beveridge Central demand table estimates 1,322 soccer participants in 2024, equivalent to 88 soccer teams. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The same demand table translates 42 cricket teams into six cricket ovals using a six-to-seven-team-per-oval benchmark. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The same demand table translates 88 soccer teams into 11 soccer pitches using a seven-to-eight-team-per-pitch benchmark. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Infrastructure reading: Donnybrook PSP is expected to join future Lockerbie and Lockerbie North developments, and residents are expected to share facilities and services across council boundaries. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The existing railway line is identified as a physical barrier that will need to be resolved for shared facilities and services. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Infrastructure reading: Mitchell Shire had more than 64,000 residents in the 2025-2026 budget context and expects more than 221,000 residents by 2046. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Infrastructure reading: Mitchell Shire expects continued growth beyond 2046 toward 250,000 residents. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The budget forecasts population growth of 7.34% in 2025-2026, 7.47% in 2026-2027, 7.16% in 2027-2028, and 7.12% in 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The financial plan forecasts developer contributions of $27.056 million in 2025-2026,$ 27.524 million in 2026-2027, $30.047 million in 2027-2028, and$ 19.367 million in 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The budget forecasts non-monetary contributions of $60.859 million in 2025-2026,$ 123.668 million in 2026-2027, $59.247 million in 2027-2028, and$ 68.419 million in 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The financial plan says non-monetary asset handovers are forecast at $28.00 million in 2025-2026 and increase by$ 2.00 million each year until reaching $40.00 million in 2031-2032. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The financial plan attributes the 2026-2027 non-monetary contribution spike to $93.66 million of anticipated developer-delivered works-in-kind, predominantly in Beveridge Central, Beveridge North West, Kilmore South East, Lockerbie, and Lockerbie North. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The budget states that development contributions are collected as development proceeds. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The budget states that development-contribution flows create cash-flow challenges for Council. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The budget identifies borrowings, partnerships, works-in-kind processes, and grant advocacy as mitigation measures for development-contribution cash-flow challenges. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The budget states that development contributions rarely provide sufficient funding for the infrastructure identified. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The budget states that delays between contribution collection and infrastructure delivery can exacerbate the infrastructure funding gap. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The budget states that development contributions and infrastructure funding depend on market conditions and development timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The financial plan says developer contributions are transferred to restricted reserves until used for specific capital-works purposes. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The financial plan says developer contributions often require Council to outlay funds before receiving developer contributions. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies Mount Fraser as outside the Lockerbie North PSP. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies Bald Hill as within the Lockerbie PSP area, not the Lockerbie North PSP area. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies volcanic cones including Bald Hill, Mount Fraser, Spring Hill, and Green Hill as regional open-space elements in the southern growth area. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies Hernes Swamp as part of the potential southern-growth-area regional park system. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work says completed PSPs such as Lockerbie North cannot use the PSP process to acquire additional Wallan Regional Park land without purchase or another mechanism. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work says land for the future regional park should be identified in PSPs and transferred under ICPs where possible to avoid purchase. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work identifies Public Acquisition Overlays as a mechanism for land not transferable under a PSP or ICP. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work identifies GAIC works-in-kind agreements as a possible mechanism for regional or state-level public purposes. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Infrastructure reading: Urban-growth sequencing: the Wallan Regional Park feasibility report describes PSPs as the primary mechanism for designating future land uses in growth areas such as Wallan-Beveridge, including subdivision form and long-term development guidance. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Infrastructure reading: Infrastructure-plan coupling: the same report states that PSPs include provision of land or funds for public infrastructure under an Infrastructure Contributions Plan for each PSP area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Infrastructure reading: Completed-PSP lock-in: once a PSP is complete, the report says there is no longer the opportunity to acquire land through that PSP process, so alternative compulsory acquisition would be required. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Infrastructure reading: Open-space land take: a 9.15% public-open-space contribution removes part of the Net Developable Area from saleable development and converts it into public active and passive open space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Infrastructure reading: Active-open-space intensity: 17.5 hectares across two reserves creates a dual-reserve sports network rather than a single oval, which changes maintenance, pavilion, lighting, parking, and school-interface requirements. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Infrastructure reading: Co-location mechanism: the 8.0 hectare reserve is tied to an indoor recreation facility and a state primary/secondary school, so its feasibility depends on school-site and indoor-recreation staging as well as reserve construction. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Infrastructure reading: Education interface: the 9.5 hectare reserve is tied to a state primary school and potential non-government school, so shared access, traffic peaks, and safety interfaces become development-sequencing issues. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Infrastructure reading: Cross-precinct service sharing: Donnybrook, Lockerbie, and Lockerbie North are expected to share facilities and services, which makes railway-line resolution a practical condition of service equity. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Infrastructure reading: DCP cash-flow mechanism: the budget says contributions are collected as development proceeds, so early works may occur before all liable land has paid its share. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Infrastructure reading: Restricted-reserve mechanism: the financial plan says developer contributions are transferred to restricted reserves until used for specific capital-works purposes. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Infrastructure reading: Works-in-kind mechanism: the financial plan distinguishes gifted assets from infrastructure delivered by developers as works-in-kind agreed before Council receives contributions and delivers works itself. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Infrastructure reading: Funding-gap mechanism: the budget says development contributions rarely provide sufficient funding for identified infrastructure, which creates a structural gap between DCP schedules and actual delivery costs. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Infrastructure reading: Market-timing mechanism: the budget says development contributions and infrastructure funding depend on market conditions and development timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Infrastructure reading: Grant-risk mechanism: the indoor recreation pre-planning line is $0.155 million and is listed as unconfirmed grant dependent, so it is not equivalent to a fully funded project. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Infrastructure reading: Regional-park exclusion mechanism: Lockerbie North is outside the WRP study area and has no major natural assets identified for WRP inclusion, so its regional-open-space role is indirect rather than land-supply based. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Infrastructure reading: Landscape-context mechanism: Mount Fraser being outside the Lockerbie North PSP means volcanic-cone protection and interpretation sit in adjacent precinct and regional-park planning rather than inside Lockerbie North land budgets. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Infrastructure reading: Beveridge-service mechanism: Beveridge Central defers tennis provision to Lockerbie North facilities, which means Lockerbie North tennis delivery affects Beveridge Central service adequacy. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Infrastructure reading: Sports-demand mechanism: Beveridge Central calculates 42 cricket teams and 88 soccer teams in 2024, so active-open-space delivery is driven by participation conversion, not only population totals. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Infrastructure reading: Facility-capacity mechanism: the benchmark of six to seven cricket teams per oval and seven to eight soccer teams per pitch translates participation counts into land and field requirements. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Infrastructure reading: Capital-stage mechanism: planning, design, construction year 1, construction year 2, and construction year 3 lines show that a DCP item becomes useful only after a multi-year project lifecycle. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Infrastructure reading: 2012: Lockerbie North is treated as a completed PSP in the Wallan Regional Park feasibility table. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Infrastructure reading: 2013: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies Mount Fraser as outside the Lockerbie North PSP and identifies southern-growth-area regional-park opportunities. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Infrastructure reading: 2014: The Sports Field Feasibility Study identifies Lockerbie and Lockerbie North as the two approved PSPs affecting parts of Mitchell Shire in this growth area. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Infrastructure reading: 2014: The Sports Field Feasibility Study records Lockerbie North public open space at 9.15% of Net Developable Area. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Infrastructure reading: 2014: The Sports Field Feasibility Study records 17.5 hectares of active playing space in Lockerbie North. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Infrastructure reading: 2022: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work states that Lockerbie North is approved, south of Mount Fraser, and outside the WRP study area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Infrastructure reading: 2024: Beveridge Central AOS uses estimated 2024 Beveridge population of 9,120 to calculate current sport demand. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Infrastructure reading: 2025-2026: Council schedules $0.311 million for Lockerbie North IT08i pedestrian signals. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Infrastructure reading: 2026-2027: Council schedules $0.249 million for Lockerbie North C02i community centre planning. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Infrastructure reading: 2026-2027: Council schedules $0.216 million for Lockerbie North OS02i sports pavilion design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Infrastructure reading: 2026-2027: Council schedules $1.053 million for Lockerbie North OS01i active open space design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Infrastructure reading: 2027-2028: Council schedules $5.185 million for Lockerbie North C02ii community centre design and construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Infrastructure reading: 2027-2028: Council schedules $0.971 million for Lockerbie North OS02ii sports pavilion construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Infrastructure reading: 2027-2028: Council schedules $4.739 million for Lockerbie North OS01ii active open space construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Infrastructure reading: 2028-2029: Council schedules $20.493 million for Lockerbie North C02iii community centre construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Infrastructure reading: 2028-2029: Council schedules $0.971 million for Lockerbie North OS02iii sports pavilion construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Infrastructure reading: 2028-2029: Council schedules $4.739 million for Lockerbie North OS01iii active open space construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Infrastructure reading: 2029-2030: Council schedules $20.493 million for Lockerbie North C02iv community centre construction year 3. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Infrastructure reading: 2029-2030: Council schedules $0.032 million for Lockerbie North OS04i sports pavilion planning and design year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Infrastructure reading: 2029-2030: Council schedules $0.025 million for Lockerbie North OS05i sports pavilion planning and design year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Infrastructure reading: 2029-2030: Council schedules $0.205 million for Lockerbie North OS03i active open space planning and design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Infrastructure reading: 2030-2031: Council schedules $0.295 million for Lockerbie North C03i community centre planning. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Infrastructure reading: 2030-2031: Council schedules $0.302 million for Lockerbie North OS04ii sports pavilion planning and design year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Infrastructure reading: 2030-2031: Council schedules $0.229 million for Lockerbie North OS05ii sports pavilion planning and design year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Infrastructure reading: 2030-2031: Council schedules $1.913 million for Lockerbie North OS03ii active open space construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Infrastructure reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $0.826 million for Lockerbie North C03ii community centre design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Infrastructure reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $0.911 million for Lockerbie North OS04iii sports pavilion construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Infrastructure reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $0.692 million for Lockerbie North OS05iii sports pavilion construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Infrastructure reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $8.616 million for Lockerbie North OS03iii active open space construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Infrastructure reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $10.247 million for Lockerbie North C03iii community centre construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Infrastructure reading: 2032-2033: Council schedules $0.911 million for Lockerbie North OS04iv sports pavilion construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Infrastructure reading: 2032-2033: Council schedules $0.692 million for Lockerbie North OS05iv sports pavilion construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Infrastructure reading: 2032-2033: Council schedules $8.616 million for Lockerbie North OS03iv active open space construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Infrastructure reading: 2033-2034: Council schedules $10.247 million for Lockerbie North C03iv community centre construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Infrastructure reading: 2026-2027: Council schedules $0.155 million for Lockerbie North Indoor Recreation (F) pre-planning. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Infrastructure reading: Gross-to-net feasibility must subtract the 9.15% public-open-space contribution from Net Developable Area assumptions before residual land-value testing. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The 5.9% active-open-space component is not interchangeable with passive open space because it must accommodate sports fields, courts, pavilions, lighting, and high-use turf or synthetic-surface decisions. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The 3.24% passive-open-space component matters for walkability and neighbourhood amenity but does not by itself satisfy the 17.5 hectare active-playing-space program. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Infrastructure reading: Because the 8.0 hectare reserve is co-located with an indoor recreation facility and a school, delivery risk includes education-land timing and indoor-recreation funding risk. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Infrastructure reading: Because the 9.5 hectare reserve is co-located with schools and court-based sport, feasibility includes peak traffic, safe access, car parking, lighting spill, and shared-use governance. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The $104.334 million Lockerbie North ledger shows that development feasibility is exposed to municipal capital timing as well as private subdivision timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The $58.096 million confirmed-contribution component reduces but does not eliminate delivery risk because confirmed contributions still have to arrive on the schedule assumed by Council. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The $46.083 million reserve-funded component depends on restricted reserves being sufficient and available for the specific project purposes. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The $0.155 million indoor recreation pre-planning item is a small dollar amount relative to the ledger but a large dependency signal because it is fully unconfirmed grant dependent. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The budget warning that development contributions rarely fully fund identified infrastructure means DCP feasibility should include escalation and funding-gap sensitivity tests. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The budget warning that market conditions affect contribution flows means slower lot sales can delay infrastructure that later residents still need. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The financial-plan expectation of $93.66 million in 2026-2027 works-in-kind across several growth areas means developer capacity and agreement timing are material to Council-wide delivery. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The Beveridge Central reliance on Lockerbie North tennis facilities means delay in Lockerbie North courts can produce service deficits outside the Lockerbie North boundary. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The projected Beveridge growth to 112,187 people by 2046 means active-open-space under-delivery compounds across a much larger future catchment than the 2024 population of 9,120. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The 2024 demand estimate of 42 cricket teams and 88 soccer teams means field demand is already measurable before the full 2046 population is reached. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The railway-line barrier between Donnybrook, Lockerbie, and Lockerbie North means cross-boundary service sharing is only feasible if physical access is resolved. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Infrastructure reading: Lockerbie North being outside the Wallan Regional Park study area means developers should not assume future regional-park land acquisition will directly offset local open-space obligations. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Infrastructure reading: Mount Fraser being outside Lockerbie North means the precinct cannot claim Mount Fraser as an internal open-space asset even though it shapes the broader landscape identity. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The completed status of Lockerbie North reduces planning uncertainty but increases the importance of the approved DCP, because later additions to regional open space would generally require purchase or another acquisition mechanism. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The absence of the primary PSP and DCP documents in the local corpus prevents verification of charge areas, dwelling yield, road hierarchy, drainage obligations, and parcel-specific staging. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Infrastructure reading: No primary submissions on the Lockerbie North PSP were located in the requested extracted Mitchell corpus. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Infrastructure reading: No planning panel report for Lockerbie North was located in the requested extracted Mitchell corpus. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Infrastructure reading: No advisory committee report specific to Lockerbie North was located in the requested extracted Mitchell corpus. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Infrastructure reading: No primary DCP charge table for Lockerbie North was located in the requested extracted Mitchell corpus. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Infrastructure reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work records contested quarry issues in nearby precincts, including proposed quarry impacts around Spring Hill, but not inside the completed Lockerbie North PSP. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work states that the completed Lockerbie North PSP did not reference the future WRP, which creates a policy coordination issue rather than a submission issue in the available corpus. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The Beveridge Central master plan shows a facility-program shift from tennis at Beveridge Central toward small-sided soccer, with tennis provision relying on Lockerbie North active open spaces. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The sports-field study and Beveridge Central master plan describe different southern Lockerbie North reserve mixes, so the final statutory reserve program requires primary PSP or later Council confirmation. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The 9.15% total open-space rate and 5.9% plus 3.24% component rates contain a 0.01 percentage-point arithmetic discrepancy, so downstream calculations should use the published total unless the primary DCP confirms otherwise. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The budget states that development-contribution funding depends on market timing, so the capital ledger should be read as a programmed sequence rather than a guarantee of actual completion dates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The financial plan separates confirmed and unconfirmed grants or contributions, so items with unconfirmed funding should not be treated as fully funded. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Infrastructure reading: The local corpus contains duplicate-named extracts for the Wallan Regional Park feasibility report and the Mitchell sports-field feasibility study, so duplicate evidence should not be double counted. (Source: local filesystem inventory)

Open-space reading

Open-space reading: Lockerbie North is listed by the Wallan Regional Park feasibility work as a completed PSP, with the PSP dated 2012 in the completed-precinct table. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Open-space reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility table states that Lockerbie North is south of Mount Fraser and outside the Wallan Regional Park study area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Open-space reading: The same feasibility table states that Lockerbie North does not contain major natural assets that would lend themselves to incorporation in the Wallan Regional Park. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Open-space reading: The same feasibility table states that 27 hectares of active and passive open space is included in the Lockerbie North PSP. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Open-space reading: The same feasibility table states that the approved Lockerbie North PSP does not reference the future Wallan Regional Park. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Open-space reading: Lockerbie North has a total public-open-space contribution of 9.15% of Net Developable Area. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Open-space reading: The Lockerbie North public-open-space contribution is split into 5.9% active open space and 3.24% passive open space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Open-space reading: The published active and passive components sum to 9.14%, which is 0.01 percentage points below the published total of 9.15%, so the available source contains a rounding discrepancy. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Open-space reading: Lockerbie PSP is a useful comparator because it has an 8.33% public-open-space contribution, split into 6.30% active open space and 2.03% passive open space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Open-space reading: Lockerbie North therefore has a 0.82 percentage-point higher total open-space contribution than Lockerbie PSP. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Open-space reading: Lockerbie North has a 0.40 percentage-point lower active-open-space component than Lockerbie PSP. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Open-space reading: Lockerbie North has a 1.21 percentage-point higher passive-open-space component than Lockerbie PSP. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Open-space reading: Lockerbie North includes 17.5 hectares of active playing space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Open-space reading: The 17.5 hectares of active playing space is made up of one 8.0 hectare reserve and one 9.5 hectare reserve. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Open-space reading: The 8.0 hectare reserve includes two full-size Australian Rules football and cricket ovals, cricket nets, and a playground. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Open-space reading: The 8.0 hectare reserve is to be located with an indoor recreation facility and a state primary/secondary school. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Open-space reading: The 9.5 hectare southern reserve includes either two full-size Australian Rules football and cricket ovals or three full-size soccer fields. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Open-space reading: The 9.5 hectare southern reserve includes cricket nets, six tennis courts, two netball courts, and a playground. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Open-space reading: The 9.5 hectare southern reserve is co-located with a state primary school and a potential non-government school. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Open-space reading: The Beveridge Central Active Open Space Master Plan describes the adjacent Lockerbie North PSP northern active open space as 8.0 hectares with two ovals, six tennis courts, and two netball or tennis courts. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Open-space reading: The Beveridge Central Active Open Space Master Plan describes the Lockerbie North PSP southern active open space as 9.5 hectares with two ovals, two overlaid rectangular pitches, one athletics track, and six tennis courts. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Open-space reading: The later Beveridge Central evidence changes the southern reserve emphasis from three full-size soccer fields to two overlaid rectangular pitches plus one athletics track. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Open-space reading: Beveridge Central AOS is planned for soccer and cricket, while tennis demand is expected to be served in coming years by the two active open spaces in the adjacent Lockerbie North PSP. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Open-space reading: Beveridge had an estimated 2024 population of 9,120 and is forecast to exceed 112,000 people by 2046. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Open-space reading: The Beveridge Central demand table estimates 639 cricket participants in 2024, equivalent to 42 cricket teams. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Open-space reading: The Beveridge Central demand table estimates 1,322 soccer participants in 2024, equivalent to 88 soccer teams. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Open-space reading: The same demand table translates 42 cricket teams into six cricket ovals using a six-to-seven-team-per-oval benchmark. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Open-space reading: The same demand table translates 88 soccer teams into 11 soccer pitches using a seven-to-eight-team-per-pitch benchmark. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Open-space reading: Donnybrook PSP is expected to join future Lockerbie and Lockerbie North developments, and residents are expected to share facilities and services across council boundaries. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Open-space reading: The existing railway line is identified as a physical barrier that will need to be resolved for shared facilities and services. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Open-space reading: Mitchell Shire had more than 64,000 residents in the 2025-2026 budget context and expects more than 221,000 residents by 2046. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Open-space reading: Mitchell Shire expects continued growth beyond 2046 toward 250,000 residents. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Open-space reading: The budget forecasts population growth of 7.34% in 2025-2026, 7.47% in 2026-2027, 7.16% in 2027-2028, and 7.12% in 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Open-space reading: The financial plan forecasts developer contributions of $27.056 million in 2025-2026,$ 27.524 million in 2026-2027, $30.047 million in 2027-2028, and$ 19.367 million in 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Open-space reading: The budget forecasts non-monetary contributions of $60.859 million in 2025-2026,$ 123.668 million in 2026-2027, $59.247 million in 2027-2028, and$ 68.419 million in 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Open-space reading: The financial plan says non-monetary asset handovers are forecast at $28.00 million in 2025-2026 and increase by$ 2.00 million each year until reaching $40.00 million in 2031-2032. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Open-space reading: The financial plan attributes the 2026-2027 non-monetary contribution spike to $93.66 million of anticipated developer-delivered works-in-kind, predominantly in Beveridge Central, Beveridge North West, Kilmore South East, Lockerbie, and Lockerbie North. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Open-space reading: The budget states that development contributions are collected as development proceeds. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Open-space reading: The budget states that development-contribution flows create cash-flow challenges for Council. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Open-space reading: The budget identifies borrowings, partnerships, works-in-kind processes, and grant advocacy as mitigation measures for development-contribution cash-flow challenges. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Open-space reading: The budget states that development contributions rarely provide sufficient funding for the infrastructure identified. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Open-space reading: The budget states that delays between contribution collection and infrastructure delivery can exacerbate the infrastructure funding gap. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Open-space reading: The budget states that development contributions and infrastructure funding depend on market conditions and development timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Open-space reading: The financial plan says developer contributions are transferred to restricted reserves until used for specific capital-works purposes. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Open-space reading: The financial plan says developer contributions often require Council to outlay funds before receiving developer contributions. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Open-space reading: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies Mount Fraser as outside the Lockerbie North PSP. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Open-space reading: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies Bald Hill as within the Lockerbie PSP area, not the Lockerbie North PSP area. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Open-space reading: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies volcanic cones including Bald Hill, Mount Fraser, Spring Hill, and Green Hill as regional open-space elements in the southern growth area. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Open-space reading: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies Hernes Swamp as part of the potential southern-growth-area regional park system. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Open-space reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work says completed PSPs such as Lockerbie North cannot use the PSP process to acquire additional Wallan Regional Park land without purchase or another mechanism. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Open-space reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work says land for the future regional park should be identified in PSPs and transferred under ICPs where possible to avoid purchase. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Open-space reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work identifies Public Acquisition Overlays as a mechanism for land not transferable under a PSP or ICP. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Open-space reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work identifies GAIC works-in-kind agreements as a possible mechanism for regional or state-level public purposes. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Open-space reading: Urban-growth sequencing: the Wallan Regional Park feasibility report describes PSPs as the primary mechanism for designating future land uses in growth areas such as Wallan-Beveridge, including subdivision form and long-term development guidance. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Open-space reading: Infrastructure-plan coupling: the same report states that PSPs include provision of land or funds for public infrastructure under an Infrastructure Contributions Plan for each PSP area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Open-space reading: Completed-PSP lock-in: once a PSP is complete, the report says there is no longer the opportunity to acquire land through that PSP process, so alternative compulsory acquisition would be required. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Open-space reading: Open-space land take: a 9.15% public-open-space contribution removes part of the Net Developable Area from saleable development and converts it into public active and passive open space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Open-space reading: Active-open-space intensity: 17.5 hectares across two reserves creates a dual-reserve sports network rather than a single oval, which changes maintenance, pavilion, lighting, parking, and school-interface requirements. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Open-space reading: Co-location mechanism: the 8.0 hectare reserve is tied to an indoor recreation facility and a state primary/secondary school, so its feasibility depends on school-site and indoor-recreation staging as well as reserve construction. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Open-space reading: Education interface: the 9.5 hectare reserve is tied to a state primary school and potential non-government school, so shared access, traffic peaks, and safety interfaces become development-sequencing issues. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Open-space reading: Cross-precinct service sharing: Donnybrook, Lockerbie, and Lockerbie North are expected to share facilities and services, which makes railway-line resolution a practical condition of service equity. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Open-space reading: DCP cash-flow mechanism: the budget says contributions are collected as development proceeds, so early works may occur before all liable land has paid its share. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Open-space reading: Restricted-reserve mechanism: the financial plan says developer contributions are transferred to restricted reserves until used for specific capital-works purposes. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Open-space reading: Works-in-kind mechanism: the financial plan distinguishes gifted assets from infrastructure delivered by developers as works-in-kind agreed before Council receives contributions and delivers works itself. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Open-space reading: Funding-gap mechanism: the budget says development contributions rarely provide sufficient funding for identified infrastructure, which creates a structural gap between DCP schedules and actual delivery costs. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Open-space reading: Market-timing mechanism: the budget says development contributions and infrastructure funding depend on market conditions and development timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Open-space reading: Grant-risk mechanism: the indoor recreation pre-planning line is $0.155 million and is listed as unconfirmed grant dependent, so it is not equivalent to a fully funded project. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Open-space reading: Regional-park exclusion mechanism: Lockerbie North is outside the WRP study area and has no major natural assets identified for WRP inclusion, so its regional-open-space role is indirect rather than land-supply based. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Open-space reading: Landscape-context mechanism: Mount Fraser being outside the Lockerbie North PSP means volcanic-cone protection and interpretation sit in adjacent precinct and regional-park planning rather than inside Lockerbie North land budgets. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Open-space reading: Beveridge-service mechanism: Beveridge Central defers tennis provision to Lockerbie North facilities, which means Lockerbie North tennis delivery affects Beveridge Central service adequacy. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Open-space reading: Sports-demand mechanism: Beveridge Central calculates 42 cricket teams and 88 soccer teams in 2024, so active-open-space delivery is driven by participation conversion, not only population totals. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Open-space reading: Facility-capacity mechanism: the benchmark of six to seven cricket teams per oval and seven to eight soccer teams per pitch translates participation counts into land and field requirements. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Open-space reading: Capital-stage mechanism: planning, design, construction year 1, construction year 2, and construction year 3 lines show that a DCP item becomes useful only after a multi-year project lifecycle. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Open-space reading: 2012: Lockerbie North is treated as a completed PSP in the Wallan Regional Park feasibility table. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Open-space reading: 2013: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies Mount Fraser as outside the Lockerbie North PSP and identifies southern-growth-area regional-park opportunities. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Open-space reading: 2014: The Sports Field Feasibility Study identifies Lockerbie and Lockerbie North as the two approved PSPs affecting parts of Mitchell Shire in this growth area. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Open-space reading: 2014: The Sports Field Feasibility Study records Lockerbie North public open space at 9.15% of Net Developable Area. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Open-space reading: 2014: The Sports Field Feasibility Study records 17.5 hectares of active playing space in Lockerbie North. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Open-space reading: 2022: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work states that Lockerbie North is approved, south of Mount Fraser, and outside the WRP study area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Open-space reading: 2024: Beveridge Central AOS uses estimated 2024 Beveridge population of 9,120 to calculate current sport demand. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Open-space reading: 2025-2026: Council schedules $0.311 million for Lockerbie North IT08i pedestrian signals. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Open-space reading: 2026-2027: Council schedules $0.249 million for Lockerbie North C02i community centre planning. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Open-space reading: 2026-2027: Council schedules $0.216 million for Lockerbie North OS02i sports pavilion design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Open-space reading: 2026-2027: Council schedules $1.053 million for Lockerbie North OS01i active open space design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Open-space reading: 2027-2028: Council schedules $5.185 million for Lockerbie North C02ii community centre design and construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Open-space reading: 2027-2028: Council schedules $0.971 million for Lockerbie North OS02ii sports pavilion construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Open-space reading: 2027-2028: Council schedules $4.739 million for Lockerbie North OS01ii active open space construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Open-space reading: 2028-2029: Council schedules $20.493 million for Lockerbie North C02iii community centre construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Open-space reading: 2028-2029: Council schedules $0.971 million for Lockerbie North OS02iii sports pavilion construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Open-space reading: 2028-2029: Council schedules $4.739 million for Lockerbie North OS01iii active open space construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Open-space reading: 2029-2030: Council schedules $20.493 million for Lockerbie North C02iv community centre construction year 3. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Open-space reading: 2029-2030: Council schedules $0.032 million for Lockerbie North OS04i sports pavilion planning and design year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Open-space reading: 2029-2030: Council schedules $0.025 million for Lockerbie North OS05i sports pavilion planning and design year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Open-space reading: 2029-2030: Council schedules $0.205 million for Lockerbie North OS03i active open space planning and design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Open-space reading: 2030-2031: Council schedules $0.295 million for Lockerbie North C03i community centre planning. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Open-space reading: 2030-2031: Council schedules $0.302 million for Lockerbie North OS04ii sports pavilion planning and design year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Open-space reading: 2030-2031: Council schedules $0.229 million for Lockerbie North OS05ii sports pavilion planning and design year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Open-space reading: 2030-2031: Council schedules $1.913 million for Lockerbie North OS03ii active open space construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Open-space reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $0.826 million for Lockerbie North C03ii community centre design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Open-space reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $0.911 million for Lockerbie North OS04iii sports pavilion construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Open-space reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $0.692 million for Lockerbie North OS05iii sports pavilion construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Open-space reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $8.616 million for Lockerbie North OS03iii active open space construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Open-space reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $10.247 million for Lockerbie North C03iii community centre construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Open-space reading: 2032-2033: Council schedules $0.911 million for Lockerbie North OS04iv sports pavilion construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Open-space reading: 2032-2033: Council schedules $0.692 million for Lockerbie North OS05iv sports pavilion construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Open-space reading: 2032-2033: Council schedules $8.616 million for Lockerbie North OS03iv active open space construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Open-space reading: 2033-2034: Council schedules $10.247 million for Lockerbie North C03iv community centre construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Open-space reading: 2026-2027: Council schedules $0.155 million for Lockerbie North Indoor Recreation (F) pre-planning. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Open-space reading: Gross-to-net feasibility must subtract the 9.15% public-open-space contribution from Net Developable Area assumptions before residual land-value testing. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Open-space reading: The 5.9% active-open-space component is not interchangeable with passive open space because it must accommodate sports fields, courts, pavilions, lighting, and high-use turf or synthetic-surface decisions. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Open-space reading: The 3.24% passive-open-space component matters for walkability and neighbourhood amenity but does not by itself satisfy the 17.5 hectare active-playing-space program. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Open-space reading: Because the 8.0 hectare reserve is co-located with an indoor recreation facility and a school, delivery risk includes education-land timing and indoor-recreation funding risk. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Open-space reading: Because the 9.5 hectare reserve is co-located with schools and court-based sport, feasibility includes peak traffic, safe access, car parking, lighting spill, and shared-use governance. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Open-space reading: The $104.334 million Lockerbie North ledger shows that development feasibility is exposed to municipal capital timing as well as private subdivision timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Open-space reading: The $58.096 million confirmed-contribution component reduces but does not eliminate delivery risk because confirmed contributions still have to arrive on the schedule assumed by Council. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Open-space reading: The $46.083 million reserve-funded component depends on restricted reserves being sufficient and available for the specific project purposes. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Open-space reading: The $0.155 million indoor recreation pre-planning item is a small dollar amount relative to the ledger but a large dependency signal because it is fully unconfirmed grant dependent. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Open-space reading: The budget warning that development contributions rarely fully fund identified infrastructure means DCP feasibility should include escalation and funding-gap sensitivity tests. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Open-space reading: The budget warning that market conditions affect contribution flows means slower lot sales can delay infrastructure that later residents still need. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Open-space reading: The financial-plan expectation of $93.66 million in 2026-2027 works-in-kind across several growth areas means developer capacity and agreement timing are material to Council-wide delivery. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Open-space reading: The Beveridge Central reliance on Lockerbie North tennis facilities means delay in Lockerbie North courts can produce service deficits outside the Lockerbie North boundary. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Open-space reading: The projected Beveridge growth to 112,187 people by 2046 means active-open-space under-delivery compounds across a much larger future catchment than the 2024 population of 9,120. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Open-space reading: The 2024 demand estimate of 42 cricket teams and 88 soccer teams means field demand is already measurable before the full 2046 population is reached. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Open-space reading: The railway-line barrier between Donnybrook, Lockerbie, and Lockerbie North means cross-boundary service sharing is only feasible if physical access is resolved. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Open-space reading: Lockerbie North being outside the Wallan Regional Park study area means developers should not assume future regional-park land acquisition will directly offset local open-space obligations. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Open-space reading: Mount Fraser being outside Lockerbie North means the precinct cannot claim Mount Fraser as an internal open-space asset even though it shapes the broader landscape identity. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Open-space reading: The completed status of Lockerbie North reduces planning uncertainty but increases the importance of the approved DCP, because later additions to regional open space would generally require purchase or another acquisition mechanism. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Open-space reading: The absence of the primary PSP and DCP documents in the local corpus prevents verification of charge areas, dwelling yield, road hierarchy, drainage obligations, and parcel-specific staging. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Open-space reading: No primary submissions on the Lockerbie North PSP were located in the requested extracted Mitchell corpus. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Open-space reading: No planning panel report for Lockerbie North was located in the requested extracted Mitchell corpus. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Open-space reading: No advisory committee report specific to Lockerbie North was located in the requested extracted Mitchell corpus. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Open-space reading: No primary DCP charge table for Lockerbie North was located in the requested extracted Mitchell corpus. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Open-space reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work records contested quarry issues in nearby precincts, including proposed quarry impacts around Spring Hill, but not inside the completed Lockerbie North PSP. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Open-space reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work states that the completed Lockerbie North PSP did not reference the future WRP, which creates a policy coordination issue rather than a submission issue in the available corpus. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Open-space reading: The Beveridge Central master plan shows a facility-program shift from tennis at Beveridge Central toward small-sided soccer, with tennis provision relying on Lockerbie North active open spaces. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Open-space reading: The sports-field study and Beveridge Central master plan describe different southern Lockerbie North reserve mixes, so the final statutory reserve program requires primary PSP or later Council confirmation. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Open-space reading: The 9.15% total open-space rate and 5.9% plus 3.24% component rates contain a 0.01 percentage-point arithmetic discrepancy, so downstream calculations should use the published total unless the primary DCP confirms otherwise. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Open-space reading: The budget states that development-contribution funding depends on market timing, so the capital ledger should be read as a programmed sequence rather than a guarantee of actual completion dates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Open-space reading: The financial plan separates confirmed and unconfirmed grants or contributions, so items with unconfirmed funding should not be treated as fully funded. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Open-space reading: The local corpus contains duplicate-named extracts for the Wallan Regional Park feasibility report and the Mitchell sports-field feasibility study, so duplicate evidence should not be double counted. (Source: local filesystem inventory)

Funding reading

Funding reading: Lockerbie North is listed by the Wallan Regional Park feasibility work as a completed PSP, with the PSP dated 2012 in the completed-precinct table. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Funding reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility table states that Lockerbie North is south of Mount Fraser and outside the Wallan Regional Park study area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Funding reading: The same feasibility table states that Lockerbie North does not contain major natural assets that would lend themselves to incorporation in the Wallan Regional Park. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Funding reading: The same feasibility table states that 27 hectares of active and passive open space is included in the Lockerbie North PSP. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Funding reading: The same feasibility table states that the approved Lockerbie North PSP does not reference the future Wallan Regional Park. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Funding reading: Lockerbie North has a total public-open-space contribution of 9.15% of Net Developable Area. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Funding reading: The Lockerbie North public-open-space contribution is split into 5.9% active open space and 3.24% passive open space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Funding reading: The published active and passive components sum to 9.14%, which is 0.01 percentage points below the published total of 9.15%, so the available source contains a rounding discrepancy. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Funding reading: Lockerbie PSP is a useful comparator because it has an 8.33% public-open-space contribution, split into 6.30% active open space and 2.03% passive open space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Funding reading: Lockerbie North therefore has a 0.82 percentage-point higher total open-space contribution than Lockerbie PSP. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Funding reading: Lockerbie North has a 0.40 percentage-point lower active-open-space component than Lockerbie PSP. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Funding reading: Lockerbie North has a 1.21 percentage-point higher passive-open-space component than Lockerbie PSP. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Funding reading: Lockerbie North includes 17.5 hectares of active playing space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Funding reading: The 17.5 hectares of active playing space is made up of one 8.0 hectare reserve and one 9.5 hectare reserve. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Funding reading: The 8.0 hectare reserve includes two full-size Australian Rules football and cricket ovals, cricket nets, and a playground. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Funding reading: The 8.0 hectare reserve is to be located with an indoor recreation facility and a state primary/secondary school. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Funding reading: The 9.5 hectare southern reserve includes either two full-size Australian Rules football and cricket ovals or three full-size soccer fields. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Funding reading: The 9.5 hectare southern reserve includes cricket nets, six tennis courts, two netball courts, and a playground. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Funding reading: The 9.5 hectare southern reserve is co-located with a state primary school and a potential non-government school. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Funding reading: The Beveridge Central Active Open Space Master Plan describes the adjacent Lockerbie North PSP northern active open space as 8.0 hectares with two ovals, six tennis courts, and two netball or tennis courts. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Funding reading: The Beveridge Central Active Open Space Master Plan describes the Lockerbie North PSP southern active open space as 9.5 hectares with two ovals, two overlaid rectangular pitches, one athletics track, and six tennis courts. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Funding reading: The later Beveridge Central evidence changes the southern reserve emphasis from three full-size soccer fields to two overlaid rectangular pitches plus one athletics track. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Funding reading: Beveridge Central AOS is planned for soccer and cricket, while tennis demand is expected to be served in coming years by the two active open spaces in the adjacent Lockerbie North PSP. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Funding reading: Beveridge had an estimated 2024 population of 9,120 and is forecast to exceed 112,000 people by 2046. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Funding reading: The Beveridge Central demand table estimates 639 cricket participants in 2024, equivalent to 42 cricket teams. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Funding reading: The Beveridge Central demand table estimates 1,322 soccer participants in 2024, equivalent to 88 soccer teams. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Funding reading: The same demand table translates 42 cricket teams into six cricket ovals using a six-to-seven-team-per-oval benchmark. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Funding reading: The same demand table translates 88 soccer teams into 11 soccer pitches using a seven-to-eight-team-per-pitch benchmark. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Funding reading: Donnybrook PSP is expected to join future Lockerbie and Lockerbie North developments, and residents are expected to share facilities and services across council boundaries. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Funding reading: The existing railway line is identified as a physical barrier that will need to be resolved for shared facilities and services. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Funding reading: Mitchell Shire had more than 64,000 residents in the 2025-2026 budget context and expects more than 221,000 residents by 2046. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding reading: Mitchell Shire expects continued growth beyond 2046 toward 250,000 residents. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding reading: The budget forecasts population growth of 7.34% in 2025-2026, 7.47% in 2026-2027, 7.16% in 2027-2028, and 7.12% in 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding reading: The financial plan forecasts developer contributions of $27.056 million in 2025-2026,$ 27.524 million in 2026-2027, $30.047 million in 2027-2028, and$ 19.367 million in 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Funding reading: The budget forecasts non-monetary contributions of $60.859 million in 2025-2026,$ 123.668 million in 2026-2027, $59.247 million in 2027-2028, and$ 68.419 million in 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding reading: The financial plan says non-monetary asset handovers are forecast at $28.00 million in 2025-2026 and increase by$ 2.00 million each year until reaching $40.00 million in 2031-2032. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Funding reading: The financial plan attributes the 2026-2027 non-monetary contribution spike to $93.66 million of anticipated developer-delivered works-in-kind, predominantly in Beveridge Central, Beveridge North West, Kilmore South East, Lockerbie, and Lockerbie North. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Funding reading: The budget states that development contributions are collected as development proceeds. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding reading: The budget states that development-contribution flows create cash-flow challenges for Council. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding reading: The budget identifies borrowings, partnerships, works-in-kind processes, and grant advocacy as mitigation measures for development-contribution cash-flow challenges. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding reading: The budget states that development contributions rarely provide sufficient funding for the infrastructure identified. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding reading: The budget states that delays between contribution collection and infrastructure delivery can exacerbate the infrastructure funding gap. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding reading: The budget states that development contributions and infrastructure funding depend on market conditions and development timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding reading: The financial plan says developer contributions are transferred to restricted reserves until used for specific capital-works purposes. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Funding reading: The financial plan says developer contributions often require Council to outlay funds before receiving developer contributions. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Funding reading: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies Mount Fraser as outside the Lockerbie North PSP. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Funding reading: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies Bald Hill as within the Lockerbie PSP area, not the Lockerbie North PSP area. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Funding reading: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies volcanic cones including Bald Hill, Mount Fraser, Spring Hill, and Green Hill as regional open-space elements in the southern growth area. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Funding reading: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies Hernes Swamp as part of the potential southern-growth-area regional park system. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Funding reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work says completed PSPs such as Lockerbie North cannot use the PSP process to acquire additional Wallan Regional Park land without purchase or another mechanism. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Funding reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work says land for the future regional park should be identified in PSPs and transferred under ICPs where possible to avoid purchase. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Funding reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work identifies Public Acquisition Overlays as a mechanism for land not transferable under a PSP or ICP. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Funding reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work identifies GAIC works-in-kind agreements as a possible mechanism for regional or state-level public purposes. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Funding reading: Urban-growth sequencing: the Wallan Regional Park feasibility report describes PSPs as the primary mechanism for designating future land uses in growth areas such as Wallan-Beveridge, including subdivision form and long-term development guidance. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Funding reading: Infrastructure-plan coupling: the same report states that PSPs include provision of land or funds for public infrastructure under an Infrastructure Contributions Plan for each PSP area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Funding reading: Completed-PSP lock-in: once a PSP is complete, the report says there is no longer the opportunity to acquire land through that PSP process, so alternative compulsory acquisition would be required. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Funding reading: Open-space land take: a 9.15% public-open-space contribution removes part of the Net Developable Area from saleable development and converts it into public active and passive open space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Funding reading: Active-open-space intensity: 17.5 hectares across two reserves creates a dual-reserve sports network rather than a single oval, which changes maintenance, pavilion, lighting, parking, and school-interface requirements. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Funding reading: Co-location mechanism: the 8.0 hectare reserve is tied to an indoor recreation facility and a state primary/secondary school, so its feasibility depends on school-site and indoor-recreation staging as well as reserve construction. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Funding reading: Education interface: the 9.5 hectare reserve is tied to a state primary school and potential non-government school, so shared access, traffic peaks, and safety interfaces become development-sequencing issues. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Funding reading: Cross-precinct service sharing: Donnybrook, Lockerbie, and Lockerbie North are expected to share facilities and services, which makes railway-line resolution a practical condition of service equity. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Funding reading: DCP cash-flow mechanism: the budget says contributions are collected as development proceeds, so early works may occur before all liable land has paid its share. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding reading: Restricted-reserve mechanism: the financial plan says developer contributions are transferred to restricted reserves until used for specific capital-works purposes. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Funding reading: Works-in-kind mechanism: the financial plan distinguishes gifted assets from infrastructure delivered by developers as works-in-kind agreed before Council receives contributions and delivers works itself. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Funding reading: Funding-gap mechanism: the budget says development contributions rarely provide sufficient funding for identified infrastructure, which creates a structural gap between DCP schedules and actual delivery costs. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding reading: Market-timing mechanism: the budget says development contributions and infrastructure funding depend on market conditions and development timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding reading: Grant-risk mechanism: the indoor recreation pre-planning line is $0.155 million and is listed as unconfirmed grant dependent, so it is not equivalent to a fully funded project. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Funding reading: Regional-park exclusion mechanism: Lockerbie North is outside the WRP study area and has no major natural assets identified for WRP inclusion, so its regional-open-space role is indirect rather than land-supply based. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Funding reading: Landscape-context mechanism: Mount Fraser being outside the Lockerbie North PSP means volcanic-cone protection and interpretation sit in adjacent precinct and regional-park planning rather than inside Lockerbie North land budgets. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Funding reading: Beveridge-service mechanism: Beveridge Central defers tennis provision to Lockerbie North facilities, which means Lockerbie North tennis delivery affects Beveridge Central service adequacy. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Funding reading: Sports-demand mechanism: Beveridge Central calculates 42 cricket teams and 88 soccer teams in 2024, so active-open-space delivery is driven by participation conversion, not only population totals. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Funding reading: Facility-capacity mechanism: the benchmark of six to seven cricket teams per oval and seven to eight soccer teams per pitch translates participation counts into land and field requirements. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Funding reading: Capital-stage mechanism: planning, design, construction year 1, construction year 2, and construction year 3 lines show that a DCP item becomes useful only after a multi-year project lifecycle. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Funding reading: 2012: Lockerbie North is treated as a completed PSP in the Wallan Regional Park feasibility table. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Funding reading: 2013: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies Mount Fraser as outside the Lockerbie North PSP and identifies southern-growth-area regional-park opportunities. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Funding reading: 2014: The Sports Field Feasibility Study identifies Lockerbie and Lockerbie North as the two approved PSPs affecting parts of Mitchell Shire in this growth area. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Funding reading: 2014: The Sports Field Feasibility Study records Lockerbie North public open space at 9.15% of Net Developable Area. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Funding reading: 2014: The Sports Field Feasibility Study records 17.5 hectares of active playing space in Lockerbie North. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Funding reading: 2022: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work states that Lockerbie North is approved, south of Mount Fraser, and outside the WRP study area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Funding reading: 2024: Beveridge Central AOS uses estimated 2024 Beveridge population of 9,120 to calculate current sport demand. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Funding reading: 2025-2026: Council schedules $0.311 million for Lockerbie North IT08i pedestrian signals. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding reading: 2026-2027: Council schedules $0.249 million for Lockerbie North C02i community centre planning. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding reading: 2026-2027: Council schedules $0.216 million for Lockerbie North OS02i sports pavilion design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding reading: 2026-2027: Council schedules $1.053 million for Lockerbie North OS01i active open space design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding reading: 2027-2028: Council schedules $5.185 million for Lockerbie North C02ii community centre design and construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding reading: 2027-2028: Council schedules $0.971 million for Lockerbie North OS02ii sports pavilion construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding reading: 2027-2028: Council schedules $4.739 million for Lockerbie North OS01ii active open space construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding reading: 2028-2029: Council schedules $20.493 million for Lockerbie North C02iii community centre construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding reading: 2028-2029: Council schedules $0.971 million for Lockerbie North OS02iii sports pavilion construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding reading: 2028-2029: Council schedules $4.739 million for Lockerbie North OS01iii active open space construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding reading: 2029-2030: Council schedules $20.493 million for Lockerbie North C02iv community centre construction year 3. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding reading: 2029-2030: Council schedules $0.032 million for Lockerbie North OS04i sports pavilion planning and design year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding reading: 2029-2030: Council schedules $0.025 million for Lockerbie North OS05i sports pavilion planning and design year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding reading: 2029-2030: Council schedules $0.205 million for Lockerbie North OS03i active open space planning and design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding reading: 2030-2031: Council schedules $0.295 million for Lockerbie North C03i community centre planning. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding reading: 2030-2031: Council schedules $0.302 million for Lockerbie North OS04ii sports pavilion planning and design year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding reading: 2030-2031: Council schedules $0.229 million for Lockerbie North OS05ii sports pavilion planning and design year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding reading: 2030-2031: Council schedules $1.913 million for Lockerbie North OS03ii active open space construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $0.826 million for Lockerbie North C03ii community centre design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $0.911 million for Lockerbie North OS04iii sports pavilion construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $0.692 million for Lockerbie North OS05iii sports pavilion construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $8.616 million for Lockerbie North OS03iii active open space construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $10.247 million for Lockerbie North C03iii community centre construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding reading: 2032-2033: Council schedules $0.911 million for Lockerbie North OS04iv sports pavilion construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding reading: 2032-2033: Council schedules $0.692 million for Lockerbie North OS05iv sports pavilion construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding reading: 2032-2033: Council schedules $8.616 million for Lockerbie North OS03iv active open space construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding reading: 2033-2034: Council schedules $10.247 million for Lockerbie North C03iv community centre construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding reading: 2026-2027: Council schedules $0.155 million for Lockerbie North Indoor Recreation (F) pre-planning. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding reading: Gross-to-net feasibility must subtract the 9.15% public-open-space contribution from Net Developable Area assumptions before residual land-value testing. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Funding reading: The 5.9% active-open-space component is not interchangeable with passive open space because it must accommodate sports fields, courts, pavilions, lighting, and high-use turf or synthetic-surface decisions. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Funding reading: The 3.24% passive-open-space component matters for walkability and neighbourhood amenity but does not by itself satisfy the 17.5 hectare active-playing-space program. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Funding reading: Because the 8.0 hectare reserve is co-located with an indoor recreation facility and a school, delivery risk includes education-land timing and indoor-recreation funding risk. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding reading: Because the 9.5 hectare reserve is co-located with schools and court-based sport, feasibility includes peak traffic, safe access, car parking, lighting spill, and shared-use governance. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Funding reading: The $104.334 million Lockerbie North ledger shows that development feasibility is exposed to municipal capital timing as well as private subdivision timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Funding reading: The $58.096 million confirmed-contribution component reduces but does not eliminate delivery risk because confirmed contributions still have to arrive on the schedule assumed by Council. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Funding reading: The $46.083 million reserve-funded component depends on restricted reserves being sufficient and available for the specific project purposes. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Funding reading: The $0.155 million indoor recreation pre-planning item is a small dollar amount relative to the ledger but a large dependency signal because it is fully unconfirmed grant dependent. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding reading: The budget warning that development contributions rarely fully fund identified infrastructure means DCP feasibility should include escalation and funding-gap sensitivity tests. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding reading: The budget warning that market conditions affect contribution flows means slower lot sales can delay infrastructure that later residents still need. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding reading: The financial-plan expectation of $93.66 million in 2026-2027 works-in-kind across several growth areas means developer capacity and agreement timing are material to Council-wide delivery. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Funding reading: The Beveridge Central reliance on Lockerbie North tennis facilities means delay in Lockerbie North courts can produce service deficits outside the Lockerbie North boundary. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Funding reading: The projected Beveridge growth to 112,187 people by 2046 means active-open-space under-delivery compounds across a much larger future catchment than the 2024 population of 9,120. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Funding reading: The 2024 demand estimate of 42 cricket teams and 88 soccer teams means field demand is already measurable before the full 2046 population is reached. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Funding reading: The railway-line barrier between Donnybrook, Lockerbie, and Lockerbie North means cross-boundary service sharing is only feasible if physical access is resolved. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Funding reading: Lockerbie North being outside the Wallan Regional Park study area means developers should not assume future regional-park land acquisition will directly offset local open-space obligations. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Funding reading: Mount Fraser being outside Lockerbie North means the precinct cannot claim Mount Fraser as an internal open-space asset even though it shapes the broader landscape identity. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Funding reading: The completed status of Lockerbie North reduces planning uncertainty but increases the importance of the approved DCP, because later additions to regional open space would generally require purchase or another acquisition mechanism. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Funding reading: The absence of the primary PSP and DCP documents in the local corpus prevents verification of charge areas, dwelling yield, road hierarchy, drainage obligations, and parcel-specific staging. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Funding reading: No primary submissions on the Lockerbie North PSP were located in the requested extracted Mitchell corpus. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Funding reading: No planning panel report for Lockerbie North was located in the requested extracted Mitchell corpus. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Funding reading: No advisory committee report specific to Lockerbie North was located in the requested extracted Mitchell corpus. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Funding reading: No primary DCP charge table for Lockerbie North was located in the requested extracted Mitchell corpus. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Funding reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work records contested quarry issues in nearby precincts, including proposed quarry impacts around Spring Hill, but not inside the completed Lockerbie North PSP. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Funding reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work states that the completed Lockerbie North PSP did not reference the future WRP, which creates a policy coordination issue rather than a submission issue in the available corpus. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Funding reading: The Beveridge Central master plan shows a facility-program shift from tennis at Beveridge Central toward small-sided soccer, with tennis provision relying on Lockerbie North active open spaces. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Funding reading: The sports-field study and Beveridge Central master plan describe different southern Lockerbie North reserve mixes, so the final statutory reserve program requires primary PSP or later Council confirmation. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Funding reading: The 9.15% total open-space rate and 5.9% plus 3.24% component rates contain a 0.01 percentage-point arithmetic discrepancy, so downstream calculations should use the published total unless the primary DCP confirms otherwise. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Funding reading: The budget states that development-contribution funding depends on market timing, so the capital ledger should be read as a programmed sequence rather than a guarantee of actual completion dates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Funding reading: The financial plan separates confirmed and unconfirmed grants or contributions, so items with unconfirmed funding should not be treated as fully funded. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Funding reading: The local corpus contains duplicate-named extracts for the Wallan Regional Park feasibility report and the Mitchell sports-field feasibility study, so duplicate evidence should not be double counted. (Source: local filesystem inventory)

Staging reading

Staging reading: Lockerbie North is listed by the Wallan Regional Park feasibility work as a completed PSP, with the PSP dated 2012 in the completed-precinct table. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility table states that Lockerbie North is south of Mount Fraser and outside the Wallan Regional Park study area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging reading: The same feasibility table states that Lockerbie North does not contain major natural assets that would lend themselves to incorporation in the Wallan Regional Park. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging reading: The same feasibility table states that 27 hectares of active and passive open space is included in the Lockerbie North PSP. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging reading: The same feasibility table states that the approved Lockerbie North PSP does not reference the future Wallan Regional Park. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging reading: Lockerbie North has a total public-open-space contribution of 9.15% of Net Developable Area. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Staging reading: The Lockerbie North public-open-space contribution is split into 5.9% active open space and 3.24% passive open space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Staging reading: The published active and passive components sum to 9.14%, which is 0.01 percentage points below the published total of 9.15%, so the available source contains a rounding discrepancy. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Staging reading: Lockerbie PSP is a useful comparator because it has an 8.33% public-open-space contribution, split into 6.30% active open space and 2.03% passive open space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Staging reading: Lockerbie North therefore has a 0.82 percentage-point higher total open-space contribution than Lockerbie PSP. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Staging reading: Lockerbie North has a 0.40 percentage-point lower active-open-space component than Lockerbie PSP. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Staging reading: Lockerbie North has a 1.21 percentage-point higher passive-open-space component than Lockerbie PSP. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Staging reading: Lockerbie North includes 17.5 hectares of active playing space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Staging reading: The 17.5 hectares of active playing space is made up of one 8.0 hectare reserve and one 9.5 hectare reserve. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Staging reading: The 8.0 hectare reserve includes two full-size Australian Rules football and cricket ovals, cricket nets, and a playground. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Staging reading: The 8.0 hectare reserve is to be located with an indoor recreation facility and a state primary/secondary school. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Staging reading: The 9.5 hectare southern reserve includes either two full-size Australian Rules football and cricket ovals or three full-size soccer fields. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Staging reading: The 9.5 hectare southern reserve includes cricket nets, six tennis courts, two netball courts, and a playground. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Staging reading: The 9.5 hectare southern reserve is co-located with a state primary school and a potential non-government school. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Staging reading: The Beveridge Central Active Open Space Master Plan describes the adjacent Lockerbie North PSP northern active open space as 8.0 hectares with two ovals, six tennis courts, and two netball or tennis courts. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Staging reading: The Beveridge Central Active Open Space Master Plan describes the Lockerbie North PSP southern active open space as 9.5 hectares with two ovals, two overlaid rectangular pitches, one athletics track, and six tennis courts. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Staging reading: The later Beveridge Central evidence changes the southern reserve emphasis from three full-size soccer fields to two overlaid rectangular pitches plus one athletics track. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Staging reading: Beveridge Central AOS is planned for soccer and cricket, while tennis demand is expected to be served in coming years by the two active open spaces in the adjacent Lockerbie North PSP. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Staging reading: Beveridge had an estimated 2024 population of 9,120 and is forecast to exceed 112,000 people by 2046. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Staging reading: The Beveridge Central demand table estimates 639 cricket participants in 2024, equivalent to 42 cricket teams. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Staging reading: The Beveridge Central demand table estimates 1,322 soccer participants in 2024, equivalent to 88 soccer teams. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Staging reading: The same demand table translates 42 cricket teams into six cricket ovals using a six-to-seven-team-per-oval benchmark. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Staging reading: The same demand table translates 88 soccer teams into 11 soccer pitches using a seven-to-eight-team-per-pitch benchmark. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Staging reading: Donnybrook PSP is expected to join future Lockerbie and Lockerbie North developments, and residents are expected to share facilities and services across council boundaries. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Staging reading: The existing railway line is identified as a physical barrier that will need to be resolved for shared facilities and services. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Staging reading: Mitchell Shire had more than 64,000 residents in the 2025-2026 budget context and expects more than 221,000 residents by 2046. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging reading: Mitchell Shire expects continued growth beyond 2046 toward 250,000 residents. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging reading: The budget forecasts population growth of 7.34% in 2025-2026, 7.47% in 2026-2027, 7.16% in 2027-2028, and 7.12% in 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging reading: The financial plan forecasts developer contributions of $27.056 million in 2025-2026,$ 27.524 million in 2026-2027, $30.047 million in 2027-2028, and$ 19.367 million in 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Staging reading: The budget forecasts non-monetary contributions of $60.859 million in 2025-2026,$ 123.668 million in 2026-2027, $59.247 million in 2027-2028, and$ 68.419 million in 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging reading: The financial plan says non-monetary asset handovers are forecast at $28.00 million in 2025-2026 and increase by$ 2.00 million each year until reaching $40.00 million in 2031-2032. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Staging reading: The financial plan attributes the 2026-2027 non-monetary contribution spike to $93.66 million of anticipated developer-delivered works-in-kind, predominantly in Beveridge Central, Beveridge North West, Kilmore South East, Lockerbie, and Lockerbie North. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Staging reading: The budget states that development contributions are collected as development proceeds. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging reading: The budget states that development-contribution flows create cash-flow challenges for Council. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging reading: The budget identifies borrowings, partnerships, works-in-kind processes, and grant advocacy as mitigation measures for development-contribution cash-flow challenges. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging reading: The budget states that development contributions rarely provide sufficient funding for the infrastructure identified. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging reading: The budget states that delays between contribution collection and infrastructure delivery can exacerbate the infrastructure funding gap. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging reading: The budget states that development contributions and infrastructure funding depend on market conditions and development timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging reading: The financial plan says developer contributions are transferred to restricted reserves until used for specific capital-works purposes. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Staging reading: The financial plan says developer contributions often require Council to outlay funds before receiving developer contributions. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Staging reading: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies Mount Fraser as outside the Lockerbie North PSP. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Staging reading: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies Bald Hill as within the Lockerbie PSP area, not the Lockerbie North PSP area. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Staging reading: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies volcanic cones including Bald Hill, Mount Fraser, Spring Hill, and Green Hill as regional open-space elements in the southern growth area. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Staging reading: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies Hernes Swamp as part of the potential southern-growth-area regional park system. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Staging reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work says completed PSPs such as Lockerbie North cannot use the PSP process to acquire additional Wallan Regional Park land without purchase or another mechanism. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work says land for the future regional park should be identified in PSPs and transferred under ICPs where possible to avoid purchase. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work identifies Public Acquisition Overlays as a mechanism for land not transferable under a PSP or ICP. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work identifies GAIC works-in-kind agreements as a possible mechanism for regional or state-level public purposes. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging reading: Urban-growth sequencing: the Wallan Regional Park feasibility report describes PSPs as the primary mechanism for designating future land uses in growth areas such as Wallan-Beveridge, including subdivision form and long-term development guidance. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging reading: Infrastructure-plan coupling: the same report states that PSPs include provision of land or funds for public infrastructure under an Infrastructure Contributions Plan for each PSP area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging reading: Completed-PSP lock-in: once a PSP is complete, the report says there is no longer the opportunity to acquire land through that PSP process, so alternative compulsory acquisition would be required. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging reading: Open-space land take: a 9.15% public-open-space contribution removes part of the Net Developable Area from saleable development and converts it into public active and passive open space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Staging reading: Active-open-space intensity: 17.5 hectares across two reserves creates a dual-reserve sports network rather than a single oval, which changes maintenance, pavilion, lighting, parking, and school-interface requirements. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Staging reading: Co-location mechanism: the 8.0 hectare reserve is tied to an indoor recreation facility and a state primary/secondary school, so its feasibility depends on school-site and indoor-recreation staging as well as reserve construction. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Staging reading: Education interface: the 9.5 hectare reserve is tied to a state primary school and potential non-government school, so shared access, traffic peaks, and safety interfaces become development-sequencing issues. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Staging reading: Cross-precinct service sharing: Donnybrook, Lockerbie, and Lockerbie North are expected to share facilities and services, which makes railway-line resolution a practical condition of service equity. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Staging reading: DCP cash-flow mechanism: the budget says contributions are collected as development proceeds, so early works may occur before all liable land has paid its share. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging reading: Restricted-reserve mechanism: the financial plan says developer contributions are transferred to restricted reserves until used for specific capital-works purposes. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Staging reading: Works-in-kind mechanism: the financial plan distinguishes gifted assets from infrastructure delivered by developers as works-in-kind agreed before Council receives contributions and delivers works itself. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Staging reading: Funding-gap mechanism: the budget says development contributions rarely provide sufficient funding for identified infrastructure, which creates a structural gap between DCP schedules and actual delivery costs. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging reading: Market-timing mechanism: the budget says development contributions and infrastructure funding depend on market conditions and development timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging reading: Grant-risk mechanism: the indoor recreation pre-planning line is $0.155 million and is listed as unconfirmed grant dependent, so it is not equivalent to a fully funded project. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Staging reading: Regional-park exclusion mechanism: Lockerbie North is outside the WRP study area and has no major natural assets identified for WRP inclusion, so its regional-open-space role is indirect rather than land-supply based. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging reading: Landscape-context mechanism: Mount Fraser being outside the Lockerbie North PSP means volcanic-cone protection and interpretation sit in adjacent precinct and regional-park planning rather than inside Lockerbie North land budgets. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Staging reading: Beveridge-service mechanism: Beveridge Central defers tennis provision to Lockerbie North facilities, which means Lockerbie North tennis delivery affects Beveridge Central service adequacy. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Staging reading: Sports-demand mechanism: Beveridge Central calculates 42 cricket teams and 88 soccer teams in 2024, so active-open-space delivery is driven by participation conversion, not only population totals. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Staging reading: Facility-capacity mechanism: the benchmark of six to seven cricket teams per oval and seven to eight soccer teams per pitch translates participation counts into land and field requirements. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Staging reading: Capital-stage mechanism: planning, design, construction year 1, construction year 2, and construction year 3 lines show that a DCP item becomes useful only after a multi-year project lifecycle. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Staging reading: 2012: Lockerbie North is treated as a completed PSP in the Wallan Regional Park feasibility table. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging reading: 2013: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies Mount Fraser as outside the Lockerbie North PSP and identifies southern-growth-area regional-park opportunities. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Staging reading: 2014: The Sports Field Feasibility Study identifies Lockerbie and Lockerbie North as the two approved PSPs affecting parts of Mitchell Shire in this growth area. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Staging reading: 2014: The Sports Field Feasibility Study records Lockerbie North public open space at 9.15% of Net Developable Area. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Staging reading: 2014: The Sports Field Feasibility Study records 17.5 hectares of active playing space in Lockerbie North. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Staging reading: 2022: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work states that Lockerbie North is approved, south of Mount Fraser, and outside the WRP study area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging reading: 2024: Beveridge Central AOS uses estimated 2024 Beveridge population of 9,120 to calculate current sport demand. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Staging reading: 2025-2026: Council schedules $0.311 million for Lockerbie North IT08i pedestrian signals. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging reading: 2026-2027: Council schedules $0.249 million for Lockerbie North C02i community centre planning. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging reading: 2026-2027: Council schedules $0.216 million for Lockerbie North OS02i sports pavilion design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging reading: 2026-2027: Council schedules $1.053 million for Lockerbie North OS01i active open space design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging reading: 2027-2028: Council schedules $5.185 million for Lockerbie North C02ii community centre design and construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging reading: 2027-2028: Council schedules $0.971 million for Lockerbie North OS02ii sports pavilion construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging reading: 2027-2028: Council schedules $4.739 million for Lockerbie North OS01ii active open space construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging reading: 2028-2029: Council schedules $20.493 million for Lockerbie North C02iii community centre construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging reading: 2028-2029: Council schedules $0.971 million for Lockerbie North OS02iii sports pavilion construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging reading: 2028-2029: Council schedules $4.739 million for Lockerbie North OS01iii active open space construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging reading: 2029-2030: Council schedules $20.493 million for Lockerbie North C02iv community centre construction year 3. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging reading: 2029-2030: Council schedules $0.032 million for Lockerbie North OS04i sports pavilion planning and design year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging reading: 2029-2030: Council schedules $0.025 million for Lockerbie North OS05i sports pavilion planning and design year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging reading: 2029-2030: Council schedules $0.205 million for Lockerbie North OS03i active open space planning and design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging reading: 2030-2031: Council schedules $0.295 million for Lockerbie North C03i community centre planning. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging reading: 2030-2031: Council schedules $0.302 million for Lockerbie North OS04ii sports pavilion planning and design year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging reading: 2030-2031: Council schedules $0.229 million for Lockerbie North OS05ii sports pavilion planning and design year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging reading: 2030-2031: Council schedules $1.913 million for Lockerbie North OS03ii active open space construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $0.826 million for Lockerbie North C03ii community centre design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $0.911 million for Lockerbie North OS04iii sports pavilion construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $0.692 million for Lockerbie North OS05iii sports pavilion construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $8.616 million for Lockerbie North OS03iii active open space construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $10.247 million for Lockerbie North C03iii community centre construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging reading: 2032-2033: Council schedules $0.911 million for Lockerbie North OS04iv sports pavilion construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging reading: 2032-2033: Council schedules $0.692 million for Lockerbie North OS05iv sports pavilion construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging reading: 2032-2033: Council schedules $8.616 million for Lockerbie North OS03iv active open space construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging reading: 2033-2034: Council schedules $10.247 million for Lockerbie North C03iv community centre construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging reading: 2026-2027: Council schedules $0.155 million for Lockerbie North Indoor Recreation (F) pre-planning. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging reading: Gross-to-net feasibility must subtract the 9.15% public-open-space contribution from Net Developable Area assumptions before residual land-value testing. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Staging reading: The 5.9% active-open-space component is not interchangeable with passive open space because it must accommodate sports fields, courts, pavilions, lighting, and high-use turf or synthetic-surface decisions. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Staging reading: The 3.24% passive-open-space component matters for walkability and neighbourhood amenity but does not by itself satisfy the 17.5 hectare active-playing-space program. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Staging reading: Because the 8.0 hectare reserve is co-located with an indoor recreation facility and a school, delivery risk includes education-land timing and indoor-recreation funding risk. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging reading: Because the 9.5 hectare reserve is co-located with schools and court-based sport, feasibility includes peak traffic, safe access, car parking, lighting spill, and shared-use governance. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Staging reading: The $104.334 million Lockerbie North ledger shows that development feasibility is exposed to municipal capital timing as well as private subdivision timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Staging reading: The $58.096 million confirmed-contribution component reduces but does not eliminate delivery risk because confirmed contributions still have to arrive on the schedule assumed by Council. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Staging reading: The $46.083 million reserve-funded component depends on restricted reserves being sufficient and available for the specific project purposes. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Staging reading: The $0.155 million indoor recreation pre-planning item is a small dollar amount relative to the ledger but a large dependency signal because it is fully unconfirmed grant dependent. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging reading: The budget warning that development contributions rarely fully fund identified infrastructure means DCP feasibility should include escalation and funding-gap sensitivity tests. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging reading: The budget warning that market conditions affect contribution flows means slower lot sales can delay infrastructure that later residents still need. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging reading: The financial-plan expectation of $93.66 million in 2026-2027 works-in-kind across several growth areas means developer capacity and agreement timing are material to Council-wide delivery. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Staging reading: The Beveridge Central reliance on Lockerbie North tennis facilities means delay in Lockerbie North courts can produce service deficits outside the Lockerbie North boundary. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Staging reading: The projected Beveridge growth to 112,187 people by 2046 means active-open-space under-delivery compounds across a much larger future catchment than the 2024 population of 9,120. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Staging reading: The 2024 demand estimate of 42 cricket teams and 88 soccer teams means field demand is already measurable before the full 2046 population is reached. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Staging reading: The railway-line barrier between Donnybrook, Lockerbie, and Lockerbie North means cross-boundary service sharing is only feasible if physical access is resolved. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Staging reading: Lockerbie North being outside the Wallan Regional Park study area means developers should not assume future regional-park land acquisition will directly offset local open-space obligations. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging reading: Mount Fraser being outside Lockerbie North means the precinct cannot claim Mount Fraser as an internal open-space asset even though it shapes the broader landscape identity. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Staging reading: The completed status of Lockerbie North reduces planning uncertainty but increases the importance of the approved DCP, because later additions to regional open space would generally require purchase or another acquisition mechanism. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging reading: The absence of the primary PSP and DCP documents in the local corpus prevents verification of charge areas, dwelling yield, road hierarchy, drainage obligations, and parcel-specific staging. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Staging reading: No primary submissions on the Lockerbie North PSP were located in the requested extracted Mitchell corpus. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Staging reading: No planning panel report for Lockerbie North was located in the requested extracted Mitchell corpus. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Staging reading: No advisory committee report specific to Lockerbie North was located in the requested extracted Mitchell corpus. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Staging reading: No primary DCP charge table for Lockerbie North was located in the requested extracted Mitchell corpus. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Staging reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work records contested quarry issues in nearby precincts, including proposed quarry impacts around Spring Hill, but not inside the completed Lockerbie North PSP. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work states that the completed Lockerbie North PSP did not reference the future WRP, which creates a policy coordination issue rather than a submission issue in the available corpus. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Staging reading: The Beveridge Central master plan shows a facility-program shift from tennis at Beveridge Central toward small-sided soccer, with tennis provision relying on Lockerbie North active open spaces. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Staging reading: The sports-field study and Beveridge Central master plan describe different southern Lockerbie North reserve mixes, so the final statutory reserve program requires primary PSP or later Council confirmation. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Staging reading: The 9.15% total open-space rate and 5.9% plus 3.24% component rates contain a 0.01 percentage-point arithmetic discrepancy, so downstream calculations should use the published total unless the primary DCP confirms otherwise. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Staging reading: The budget states that development-contribution funding depends on market timing, so the capital ledger should be read as a programmed sequence rather than a guarantee of actual completion dates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Staging reading: The financial plan separates confirmed and unconfirmed grants or contributions, so items with unconfirmed funding should not be treated as fully funded. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Staging reading: The local corpus contains duplicate-named extracts for the Wallan Regional Park feasibility report and the Mitchell sports-field feasibility study, so duplicate evidence should not be double counted. (Source: local filesystem inventory)

Feasibility reading

Feasibility reading: Lockerbie North is listed by the Wallan Regional Park feasibility work as a completed PSP, with the PSP dated 2012 in the completed-precinct table. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Feasibility reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility table states that Lockerbie North is south of Mount Fraser and outside the Wallan Regional Park study area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Feasibility reading: The same feasibility table states that Lockerbie North does not contain major natural assets that would lend themselves to incorporation in the Wallan Regional Park. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Feasibility reading: The same feasibility table states that 27 hectares of active and passive open space is included in the Lockerbie North PSP. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Feasibility reading: The same feasibility table states that the approved Lockerbie North PSP does not reference the future Wallan Regional Park. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Feasibility reading: Lockerbie North has a total public-open-space contribution of 9.15% of Net Developable Area. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Feasibility reading: The Lockerbie North public-open-space contribution is split into 5.9% active open space and 3.24% passive open space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Feasibility reading: The published active and passive components sum to 9.14%, which is 0.01 percentage points below the published total of 9.15%, so the available source contains a rounding discrepancy. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Feasibility reading: Lockerbie PSP is a useful comparator because it has an 8.33% public-open-space contribution, split into 6.30% active open space and 2.03% passive open space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Feasibility reading: Lockerbie North therefore has a 0.82 percentage-point higher total open-space contribution than Lockerbie PSP. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Feasibility reading: Lockerbie North has a 0.40 percentage-point lower active-open-space component than Lockerbie PSP. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Feasibility reading: Lockerbie North has a 1.21 percentage-point higher passive-open-space component than Lockerbie PSP. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Feasibility reading: Lockerbie North includes 17.5 hectares of active playing space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Feasibility reading: The 17.5 hectares of active playing space is made up of one 8.0 hectare reserve and one 9.5 hectare reserve. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Feasibility reading: The 8.0 hectare reserve includes two full-size Australian Rules football and cricket ovals, cricket nets, and a playground. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Feasibility reading: The 8.0 hectare reserve is to be located with an indoor recreation facility and a state primary/secondary school. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Feasibility reading: The 9.5 hectare southern reserve includes either two full-size Australian Rules football and cricket ovals or three full-size soccer fields. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Feasibility reading: The 9.5 hectare southern reserve includes cricket nets, six tennis courts, two netball courts, and a playground. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Feasibility reading: The 9.5 hectare southern reserve is co-located with a state primary school and a potential non-government school. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Feasibility reading: The Beveridge Central Active Open Space Master Plan describes the adjacent Lockerbie North PSP northern active open space as 8.0 hectares with two ovals, six tennis courts, and two netball or tennis courts. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Feasibility reading: The Beveridge Central Active Open Space Master Plan describes the Lockerbie North PSP southern active open space as 9.5 hectares with two ovals, two overlaid rectangular pitches, one athletics track, and six tennis courts. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Feasibility reading: The later Beveridge Central evidence changes the southern reserve emphasis from three full-size soccer fields to two overlaid rectangular pitches plus one athletics track. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Feasibility reading: Beveridge Central AOS is planned for soccer and cricket, while tennis demand is expected to be served in coming years by the two active open spaces in the adjacent Lockerbie North PSP. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Feasibility reading: Beveridge had an estimated 2024 population of 9,120 and is forecast to exceed 112,000 people by 2046. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Feasibility reading: The Beveridge Central demand table estimates 639 cricket participants in 2024, equivalent to 42 cricket teams. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Feasibility reading: The Beveridge Central demand table estimates 1,322 soccer participants in 2024, equivalent to 88 soccer teams. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Feasibility reading: The same demand table translates 42 cricket teams into six cricket ovals using a six-to-seven-team-per-oval benchmark. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Feasibility reading: The same demand table translates 88 soccer teams into 11 soccer pitches using a seven-to-eight-team-per-pitch benchmark. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Feasibility reading: Donnybrook PSP is expected to join future Lockerbie and Lockerbie North developments, and residents are expected to share facilities and services across council boundaries. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Feasibility reading: The existing railway line is identified as a physical barrier that will need to be resolved for shared facilities and services. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Feasibility reading: Mitchell Shire had more than 64,000 residents in the 2025-2026 budget context and expects more than 221,000 residents by 2046. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Feasibility reading: Mitchell Shire expects continued growth beyond 2046 toward 250,000 residents. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Feasibility reading: The budget forecasts population growth of 7.34% in 2025-2026, 7.47% in 2026-2027, 7.16% in 2027-2028, and 7.12% in 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Feasibility reading: The financial plan forecasts developer contributions of $27.056 million in 2025-2026,$ 27.524 million in 2026-2027, $30.047 million in 2027-2028, and$ 19.367 million in 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility reading: The budget forecasts non-monetary contributions of $60.859 million in 2025-2026,$ 123.668 million in 2026-2027, $59.247 million in 2027-2028, and$ 68.419 million in 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Feasibility reading: The financial plan says non-monetary asset handovers are forecast at $28.00 million in 2025-2026 and increase by$ 2.00 million each year until reaching $40.00 million in 2031-2032. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility reading: The financial plan attributes the 2026-2027 non-monetary contribution spike to $93.66 million of anticipated developer-delivered works-in-kind, predominantly in Beveridge Central, Beveridge North West, Kilmore South East, Lockerbie, and Lockerbie North. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility reading: The budget states that development contributions are collected as development proceeds. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Feasibility reading: The budget states that development-contribution flows create cash-flow challenges for Council. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Feasibility reading: The budget identifies borrowings, partnerships, works-in-kind processes, and grant advocacy as mitigation measures for development-contribution cash-flow challenges. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Feasibility reading: The budget states that development contributions rarely provide sufficient funding for the infrastructure identified. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Feasibility reading: The budget states that delays between contribution collection and infrastructure delivery can exacerbate the infrastructure funding gap. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Feasibility reading: The budget states that development contributions and infrastructure funding depend on market conditions and development timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Feasibility reading: The financial plan says developer contributions are transferred to restricted reserves until used for specific capital-works purposes. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility reading: The financial plan says developer contributions often require Council to outlay funds before receiving developer contributions. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility reading: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies Mount Fraser as outside the Lockerbie North PSP. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Feasibility reading: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies Bald Hill as within the Lockerbie PSP area, not the Lockerbie North PSP area. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Feasibility reading: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies volcanic cones including Bald Hill, Mount Fraser, Spring Hill, and Green Hill as regional open-space elements in the southern growth area. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Feasibility reading: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies Hernes Swamp as part of the potential southern-growth-area regional park system. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Feasibility reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work says completed PSPs such as Lockerbie North cannot use the PSP process to acquire additional Wallan Regional Park land without purchase or another mechanism. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Feasibility reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work says land for the future regional park should be identified in PSPs and transferred under ICPs where possible to avoid purchase. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Feasibility reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work identifies Public Acquisition Overlays as a mechanism for land not transferable under a PSP or ICP. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Feasibility reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work identifies GAIC works-in-kind agreements as a possible mechanism for regional or state-level public purposes. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Feasibility reading: Urban-growth sequencing: the Wallan Regional Park feasibility report describes PSPs as the primary mechanism for designating future land uses in growth areas such as Wallan-Beveridge, including subdivision form and long-term development guidance. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Feasibility reading: Infrastructure-plan coupling: the same report states that PSPs include provision of land or funds for public infrastructure under an Infrastructure Contributions Plan for each PSP area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Feasibility reading: Completed-PSP lock-in: once a PSP is complete, the report says there is no longer the opportunity to acquire land through that PSP process, so alternative compulsory acquisition would be required. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Feasibility reading: Open-space land take: a 9.15% public-open-space contribution removes part of the Net Developable Area from saleable development and converts it into public active and passive open space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Feasibility reading: Active-open-space intensity: 17.5 hectares across two reserves creates a dual-reserve sports network rather than a single oval, which changes maintenance, pavilion, lighting, parking, and school-interface requirements. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Feasibility reading: Co-location mechanism: the 8.0 hectare reserve is tied to an indoor recreation facility and a state primary/secondary school, so its feasibility depends on school-site and indoor-recreation staging as well as reserve construction. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Feasibility reading: Education interface: the 9.5 hectare reserve is tied to a state primary school and potential non-government school, so shared access, traffic peaks, and safety interfaces become development-sequencing issues. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Feasibility reading: Cross-precinct service sharing: Donnybrook, Lockerbie, and Lockerbie North are expected to share facilities and services, which makes railway-line resolution a practical condition of service equity. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Feasibility reading: DCP cash-flow mechanism: the budget says contributions are collected as development proceeds, so early works may occur before all liable land has paid its share. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Feasibility reading: Restricted-reserve mechanism: the financial plan says developer contributions are transferred to restricted reserves until used for specific capital-works purposes. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility reading: Works-in-kind mechanism: the financial plan distinguishes gifted assets from infrastructure delivered by developers as works-in-kind agreed before Council receives contributions and delivers works itself. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility reading: Funding-gap mechanism: the budget says development contributions rarely provide sufficient funding for identified infrastructure, which creates a structural gap between DCP schedules and actual delivery costs. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Feasibility reading: Market-timing mechanism: the budget says development contributions and infrastructure funding depend on market conditions and development timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Feasibility reading: Grant-risk mechanism: the indoor recreation pre-planning line is $0.155 million and is listed as unconfirmed grant dependent, so it is not equivalent to a fully funded project. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility reading: Regional-park exclusion mechanism: Lockerbie North is outside the WRP study area and has no major natural assets identified for WRP inclusion, so its regional-open-space role is indirect rather than land-supply based. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Feasibility reading: Landscape-context mechanism: Mount Fraser being outside the Lockerbie North PSP means volcanic-cone protection and interpretation sit in adjacent precinct and regional-park planning rather than inside Lockerbie North land budgets. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Feasibility reading: Beveridge-service mechanism: Beveridge Central defers tennis provision to Lockerbie North facilities, which means Lockerbie North tennis delivery affects Beveridge Central service adequacy. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Feasibility reading: Sports-demand mechanism: Beveridge Central calculates 42 cricket teams and 88 soccer teams in 2024, so active-open-space delivery is driven by participation conversion, not only population totals. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Feasibility reading: Facility-capacity mechanism: the benchmark of six to seven cricket teams per oval and seven to eight soccer teams per pitch translates participation counts into land and field requirements. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Feasibility reading: Capital-stage mechanism: planning, design, construction year 1, construction year 2, and construction year 3 lines show that a DCP item becomes useful only after a multi-year project lifecycle. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility reading: 2012: Lockerbie North is treated as a completed PSP in the Wallan Regional Park feasibility table. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Feasibility reading: 2013: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies Mount Fraser as outside the Lockerbie North PSP and identifies southern-growth-area regional-park opportunities. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Feasibility reading: 2014: The Sports Field Feasibility Study identifies Lockerbie and Lockerbie North as the two approved PSPs affecting parts of Mitchell Shire in this growth area. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Feasibility reading: 2014: The Sports Field Feasibility Study records Lockerbie North public open space at 9.15% of Net Developable Area. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Feasibility reading: 2014: The Sports Field Feasibility Study records 17.5 hectares of active playing space in Lockerbie North. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Feasibility reading: 2022: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work states that Lockerbie North is approved, south of Mount Fraser, and outside the WRP study area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Feasibility reading: 2024: Beveridge Central AOS uses estimated 2024 Beveridge population of 9,120 to calculate current sport demand. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Feasibility reading: 2025-2026: Council schedules $0.311 million for Lockerbie North IT08i pedestrian signals. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Feasibility reading: 2026-2027: Council schedules $0.249 million for Lockerbie North C02i community centre planning. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Feasibility reading: 2026-2027: Council schedules $0.216 million for Lockerbie North OS02i sports pavilion design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Feasibility reading: 2026-2027: Council schedules $1.053 million for Lockerbie North OS01i active open space design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Feasibility reading: 2027-2028: Council schedules $5.185 million for Lockerbie North C02ii community centre design and construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Feasibility reading: 2027-2028: Council schedules $0.971 million for Lockerbie North OS02ii sports pavilion construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Feasibility reading: 2027-2028: Council schedules $4.739 million for Lockerbie North OS01ii active open space construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Feasibility reading: 2028-2029: Council schedules $20.493 million for Lockerbie North C02iii community centre construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Feasibility reading: 2028-2029: Council schedules $0.971 million for Lockerbie North OS02iii sports pavilion construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Feasibility reading: 2028-2029: Council schedules $4.739 million for Lockerbie North OS01iii active open space construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Feasibility reading: 2029-2030: Council schedules $20.493 million for Lockerbie North C02iv community centre construction year 3. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Feasibility reading: 2029-2030: Council schedules $0.032 million for Lockerbie North OS04i sports pavilion planning and design year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Feasibility reading: 2029-2030: Council schedules $0.025 million for Lockerbie North OS05i sports pavilion planning and design year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Feasibility reading: 2029-2030: Council schedules $0.205 million for Lockerbie North OS03i active open space planning and design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Feasibility reading: 2030-2031: Council schedules $0.295 million for Lockerbie North C03i community centre planning. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Feasibility reading: 2030-2031: Council schedules $0.302 million for Lockerbie North OS04ii sports pavilion planning and design year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Feasibility reading: 2030-2031: Council schedules $0.229 million for Lockerbie North OS05ii sports pavilion planning and design year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Feasibility reading: 2030-2031: Council schedules $1.913 million for Lockerbie North OS03ii active open space construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Feasibility reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $0.826 million for Lockerbie North C03ii community centre design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Feasibility reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $0.911 million for Lockerbie North OS04iii sports pavilion construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Feasibility reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $0.692 million for Lockerbie North OS05iii sports pavilion construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Feasibility reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $8.616 million for Lockerbie North OS03iii active open space construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Feasibility reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $10.247 million for Lockerbie North C03iii community centre construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Feasibility reading: 2032-2033: Council schedules $0.911 million for Lockerbie North OS04iv sports pavilion construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Feasibility reading: 2032-2033: Council schedules $0.692 million for Lockerbie North OS05iv sports pavilion construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Feasibility reading: 2032-2033: Council schedules $8.616 million for Lockerbie North OS03iv active open space construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Feasibility reading: 2033-2034: Council schedules $10.247 million for Lockerbie North C03iv community centre construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Feasibility reading: 2026-2027: Council schedules $0.155 million for Lockerbie North Indoor Recreation (F) pre-planning. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Feasibility reading: Gross-to-net feasibility must subtract the 9.15% public-open-space contribution from Net Developable Area assumptions before residual land-value testing. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Feasibility reading: The 5.9% active-open-space component is not interchangeable with passive open space because it must accommodate sports fields, courts, pavilions, lighting, and high-use turf or synthetic-surface decisions. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Feasibility reading: The 3.24% passive-open-space component matters for walkability and neighbourhood amenity but does not by itself satisfy the 17.5 hectare active-playing-space program. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Feasibility reading: Because the 8.0 hectare reserve is co-located with an indoor recreation facility and a school, delivery risk includes education-land timing and indoor-recreation funding risk. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Feasibility reading: Because the 9.5 hectare reserve is co-located with schools and court-based sport, feasibility includes peak traffic, safe access, car parking, lighting spill, and shared-use governance. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Feasibility reading: The $104.334 million Lockerbie North ledger shows that development feasibility is exposed to municipal capital timing as well as private subdivision timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility reading: The $58.096 million confirmed-contribution component reduces but does not eliminate delivery risk because confirmed contributions still have to arrive on the schedule assumed by Council. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility reading: The $46.083 million reserve-funded component depends on restricted reserves being sufficient and available for the specific project purposes. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility reading: The $0.155 million indoor recreation pre-planning item is a small dollar amount relative to the ledger but a large dependency signal because it is fully unconfirmed grant dependent. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Feasibility reading: The budget warning that development contributions rarely fully fund identified infrastructure means DCP feasibility should include escalation and funding-gap sensitivity tests. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Feasibility reading: The budget warning that market conditions affect contribution flows means slower lot sales can delay infrastructure that later residents still need. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Feasibility reading: The financial-plan expectation of $93.66 million in 2026-2027 works-in-kind across several growth areas means developer capacity and agreement timing are material to Council-wide delivery. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility reading: The Beveridge Central reliance on Lockerbie North tennis facilities means delay in Lockerbie North courts can produce service deficits outside the Lockerbie North boundary. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Feasibility reading: The projected Beveridge growth to 112,187 people by 2046 means active-open-space under-delivery compounds across a much larger future catchment than the 2024 population of 9,120. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Feasibility reading: The 2024 demand estimate of 42 cricket teams and 88 soccer teams means field demand is already measurable before the full 2046 population is reached. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Feasibility reading: The railway-line barrier between Donnybrook, Lockerbie, and Lockerbie North means cross-boundary service sharing is only feasible if physical access is resolved. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Feasibility reading: Lockerbie North being outside the Wallan Regional Park study area means developers should not assume future regional-park land acquisition will directly offset local open-space obligations. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Feasibility reading: Mount Fraser being outside Lockerbie North means the precinct cannot claim Mount Fraser as an internal open-space asset even though it shapes the broader landscape identity. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Feasibility reading: The completed status of Lockerbie North reduces planning uncertainty but increases the importance of the approved DCP, because later additions to regional open space would generally require purchase or another acquisition mechanism. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Feasibility reading: The absence of the primary PSP and DCP documents in the local corpus prevents verification of charge areas, dwelling yield, road hierarchy, drainage obligations, and parcel-specific staging. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Feasibility reading: No primary submissions on the Lockerbie North PSP were located in the requested extracted Mitchell corpus. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Feasibility reading: No planning panel report for Lockerbie North was located in the requested extracted Mitchell corpus. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Feasibility reading: No advisory committee report specific to Lockerbie North was located in the requested extracted Mitchell corpus. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Feasibility reading: No primary DCP charge table for Lockerbie North was located in the requested extracted Mitchell corpus. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Feasibility reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work records contested quarry issues in nearby precincts, including proposed quarry impacts around Spring Hill, but not inside the completed Lockerbie North PSP. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Feasibility reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work states that the completed Lockerbie North PSP did not reference the future WRP, which creates a policy coordination issue rather than a submission issue in the available corpus. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Feasibility reading: The Beveridge Central master plan shows a facility-program shift from tennis at Beveridge Central toward small-sided soccer, with tennis provision relying on Lockerbie North active open spaces. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Feasibility reading: The sports-field study and Beveridge Central master plan describe different southern Lockerbie North reserve mixes, so the final statutory reserve program requires primary PSP or later Council confirmation. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Feasibility reading: The 9.15% total open-space rate and 5.9% plus 3.24% component rates contain a 0.01 percentage-point arithmetic discrepancy, so downstream calculations should use the published total unless the primary DCP confirms otherwise. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Feasibility reading: The budget states that development-contribution funding depends on market timing, so the capital ledger should be read as a programmed sequence rather than a guarantee of actual completion dates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Feasibility reading: The financial plan separates confirmed and unconfirmed grants or contributions, so items with unconfirmed funding should not be treated as fully funded. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Feasibility reading: The local corpus contains duplicate-named extracts for the Wallan Regional Park feasibility report and the Mitchell sports-field feasibility study, so duplicate evidence should not be double counted. (Source: local filesystem inventory)

Risk reading

Risk reading: Lockerbie North is listed by the Wallan Regional Park feasibility work as a completed PSP, with the PSP dated 2012 in the completed-precinct table. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility table states that Lockerbie North is south of Mount Fraser and outside the Wallan Regional Park study area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk reading: The same feasibility table states that Lockerbie North does not contain major natural assets that would lend themselves to incorporation in the Wallan Regional Park. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk reading: The same feasibility table states that 27 hectares of active and passive open space is included in the Lockerbie North PSP. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk reading: The same feasibility table states that the approved Lockerbie North PSP does not reference the future Wallan Regional Park. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk reading: Lockerbie North has a total public-open-space contribution of 9.15% of Net Developable Area. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk reading: The Lockerbie North public-open-space contribution is split into 5.9% active open space and 3.24% passive open space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk reading: The published active and passive components sum to 9.14%, which is 0.01 percentage points below the published total of 9.15%, so the available source contains a rounding discrepancy. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk reading: Lockerbie PSP is a useful comparator because it has an 8.33% public-open-space contribution, split into 6.30% active open space and 2.03% passive open space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk reading: Lockerbie North therefore has a 0.82 percentage-point higher total open-space contribution than Lockerbie PSP. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk reading: Lockerbie North has a 0.40 percentage-point lower active-open-space component than Lockerbie PSP. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk reading: Lockerbie North has a 1.21 percentage-point higher passive-open-space component than Lockerbie PSP. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk reading: Lockerbie North includes 17.5 hectares of active playing space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk reading: The 17.5 hectares of active playing space is made up of one 8.0 hectare reserve and one 9.5 hectare reserve. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk reading: The 8.0 hectare reserve includes two full-size Australian Rules football and cricket ovals, cricket nets, and a playground. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk reading: The 8.0 hectare reserve is to be located with an indoor recreation facility and a state primary/secondary school. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk reading: The 9.5 hectare southern reserve includes either two full-size Australian Rules football and cricket ovals or three full-size soccer fields. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk reading: The 9.5 hectare southern reserve includes cricket nets, six tennis courts, two netball courts, and a playground. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk reading: The 9.5 hectare southern reserve is co-located with a state primary school and a potential non-government school. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk reading: The Beveridge Central Active Open Space Master Plan describes the adjacent Lockerbie North PSP northern active open space as 8.0 hectares with two ovals, six tennis courts, and two netball or tennis courts. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Risk reading: The Beveridge Central Active Open Space Master Plan describes the Lockerbie North PSP southern active open space as 9.5 hectares with two ovals, two overlaid rectangular pitches, one athletics track, and six tennis courts. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Risk reading: The later Beveridge Central evidence changes the southern reserve emphasis from three full-size soccer fields to two overlaid rectangular pitches plus one athletics track. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Risk reading: Beveridge Central AOS is planned for soccer and cricket, while tennis demand is expected to be served in coming years by the two active open spaces in the adjacent Lockerbie North PSP. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Risk reading: Beveridge had an estimated 2024 population of 9,120 and is forecast to exceed 112,000 people by 2046. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Risk reading: The Beveridge Central demand table estimates 639 cricket participants in 2024, equivalent to 42 cricket teams. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Risk reading: The Beveridge Central demand table estimates 1,322 soccer participants in 2024, equivalent to 88 soccer teams. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Risk reading: The same demand table translates 42 cricket teams into six cricket ovals using a six-to-seven-team-per-oval benchmark. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Risk reading: The same demand table translates 88 soccer teams into 11 soccer pitches using a seven-to-eight-team-per-pitch benchmark. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Risk reading: Donnybrook PSP is expected to join future Lockerbie and Lockerbie North developments, and residents are expected to share facilities and services across council boundaries. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk reading: The existing railway line is identified as a physical barrier that will need to be resolved for shared facilities and services. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk reading: Mitchell Shire had more than 64,000 residents in the 2025-2026 budget context and expects more than 221,000 residents by 2046. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk reading: Mitchell Shire expects continued growth beyond 2046 toward 250,000 residents. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk reading: The budget forecasts population growth of 7.34% in 2025-2026, 7.47% in 2026-2027, 7.16% in 2027-2028, and 7.12% in 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk reading: The financial plan forecasts developer contributions of $27.056 million in 2025-2026,$ 27.524 million in 2026-2027, $30.047 million in 2027-2028, and$ 19.367 million in 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Risk reading: The budget forecasts non-monetary contributions of $60.859 million in 2025-2026,$ 123.668 million in 2026-2027, $59.247 million in 2027-2028, and$ 68.419 million in 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk reading: The financial plan says non-monetary asset handovers are forecast at $28.00 million in 2025-2026 and increase by$ 2.00 million each year until reaching $40.00 million in 2031-2032. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Risk reading: The financial plan attributes the 2026-2027 non-monetary contribution spike to $93.66 million of anticipated developer-delivered works-in-kind, predominantly in Beveridge Central, Beveridge North West, Kilmore South East, Lockerbie, and Lockerbie North. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Risk reading: The budget states that development contributions are collected as development proceeds. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk reading: The budget states that development-contribution flows create cash-flow challenges for Council. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk reading: The budget identifies borrowings, partnerships, works-in-kind processes, and grant advocacy as mitigation measures for development-contribution cash-flow challenges. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk reading: The budget states that development contributions rarely provide sufficient funding for the infrastructure identified. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk reading: The budget states that delays between contribution collection and infrastructure delivery can exacerbate the infrastructure funding gap. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk reading: The budget states that development contributions and infrastructure funding depend on market conditions and development timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk reading: The financial plan says developer contributions are transferred to restricted reserves until used for specific capital-works purposes. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Risk reading: The financial plan says developer contributions often require Council to outlay funds before receiving developer contributions. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Risk reading: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies Mount Fraser as outside the Lockerbie North PSP. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Risk reading: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies Bald Hill as within the Lockerbie PSP area, not the Lockerbie North PSP area. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Risk reading: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies volcanic cones including Bald Hill, Mount Fraser, Spring Hill, and Green Hill as regional open-space elements in the southern growth area. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Risk reading: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies Hernes Swamp as part of the potential southern-growth-area regional park system. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Risk reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work says completed PSPs such as Lockerbie North cannot use the PSP process to acquire additional Wallan Regional Park land without purchase or another mechanism. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work says land for the future regional park should be identified in PSPs and transferred under ICPs where possible to avoid purchase. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work identifies Public Acquisition Overlays as a mechanism for land not transferable under a PSP or ICP. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work identifies GAIC works-in-kind agreements as a possible mechanism for regional or state-level public purposes. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk reading: Urban-growth sequencing: the Wallan Regional Park feasibility report describes PSPs as the primary mechanism for designating future land uses in growth areas such as Wallan-Beveridge, including subdivision form and long-term development guidance. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk reading: Infrastructure-plan coupling: the same report states that PSPs include provision of land or funds for public infrastructure under an Infrastructure Contributions Plan for each PSP area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk reading: Completed-PSP lock-in: once a PSP is complete, the report says there is no longer the opportunity to acquire land through that PSP process, so alternative compulsory acquisition would be required. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk reading: Open-space land take: a 9.15% public-open-space contribution removes part of the Net Developable Area from saleable development and converts it into public active and passive open space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk reading: Active-open-space intensity: 17.5 hectares across two reserves creates a dual-reserve sports network rather than a single oval, which changes maintenance, pavilion, lighting, parking, and school-interface requirements. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk reading: Co-location mechanism: the 8.0 hectare reserve is tied to an indoor recreation facility and a state primary/secondary school, so its feasibility depends on school-site and indoor-recreation staging as well as reserve construction. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk reading: Education interface: the 9.5 hectare reserve is tied to a state primary school and potential non-government school, so shared access, traffic peaks, and safety interfaces become development-sequencing issues. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk reading: Cross-precinct service sharing: Donnybrook, Lockerbie, and Lockerbie North are expected to share facilities and services, which makes railway-line resolution a practical condition of service equity. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk reading: DCP cash-flow mechanism: the budget says contributions are collected as development proceeds, so early works may occur before all liable land has paid its share. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk reading: Restricted-reserve mechanism: the financial plan says developer contributions are transferred to restricted reserves until used for specific capital-works purposes. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Risk reading: Works-in-kind mechanism: the financial plan distinguishes gifted assets from infrastructure delivered by developers as works-in-kind agreed before Council receives contributions and delivers works itself. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Risk reading: Funding-gap mechanism: the budget says development contributions rarely provide sufficient funding for identified infrastructure, which creates a structural gap between DCP schedules and actual delivery costs. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk reading: Market-timing mechanism: the budget says development contributions and infrastructure funding depend on market conditions and development timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk reading: Grant-risk mechanism: the indoor recreation pre-planning line is $0.155 million and is listed as unconfirmed grant dependent, so it is not equivalent to a fully funded project. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Risk reading: Regional-park exclusion mechanism: Lockerbie North is outside the WRP study area and has no major natural assets identified for WRP inclusion, so its regional-open-space role is indirect rather than land-supply based. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk reading: Landscape-context mechanism: Mount Fraser being outside the Lockerbie North PSP means volcanic-cone protection and interpretation sit in adjacent precinct and regional-park planning rather than inside Lockerbie North land budgets. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Risk reading: Beveridge-service mechanism: Beveridge Central defers tennis provision to Lockerbie North facilities, which means Lockerbie North tennis delivery affects Beveridge Central service adequacy. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Risk reading: Sports-demand mechanism: Beveridge Central calculates 42 cricket teams and 88 soccer teams in 2024, so active-open-space delivery is driven by participation conversion, not only population totals. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Risk reading: Facility-capacity mechanism: the benchmark of six to seven cricket teams per oval and seven to eight soccer teams per pitch translates participation counts into land and field requirements. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Risk reading: Capital-stage mechanism: planning, design, construction year 1, construction year 2, and construction year 3 lines show that a DCP item becomes useful only after a multi-year project lifecycle. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Risk reading: 2012: Lockerbie North is treated as a completed PSP in the Wallan Regional Park feasibility table. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk reading: 2013: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies Mount Fraser as outside the Lockerbie North PSP and identifies southern-growth-area regional-park opportunities. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Risk reading: 2014: The Sports Field Feasibility Study identifies Lockerbie and Lockerbie North as the two approved PSPs affecting parts of Mitchell Shire in this growth area. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk reading: 2014: The Sports Field Feasibility Study records Lockerbie North public open space at 9.15% of Net Developable Area. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk reading: 2014: The Sports Field Feasibility Study records 17.5 hectares of active playing space in Lockerbie North. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk reading: 2022: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work states that Lockerbie North is approved, south of Mount Fraser, and outside the WRP study area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk reading: 2024: Beveridge Central AOS uses estimated 2024 Beveridge population of 9,120 to calculate current sport demand. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Risk reading: 2025-2026: Council schedules $0.311 million for Lockerbie North IT08i pedestrian signals. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk reading: 2026-2027: Council schedules $0.249 million for Lockerbie North C02i community centre planning. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk reading: 2026-2027: Council schedules $0.216 million for Lockerbie North OS02i sports pavilion design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk reading: 2026-2027: Council schedules $1.053 million for Lockerbie North OS01i active open space design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk reading: 2027-2028: Council schedules $5.185 million for Lockerbie North C02ii community centre design and construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk reading: 2027-2028: Council schedules $0.971 million for Lockerbie North OS02ii sports pavilion construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk reading: 2027-2028: Council schedules $4.739 million for Lockerbie North OS01ii active open space construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk reading: 2028-2029: Council schedules $20.493 million for Lockerbie North C02iii community centre construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk reading: 2028-2029: Council schedules $0.971 million for Lockerbie North OS02iii sports pavilion construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk reading: 2028-2029: Council schedules $4.739 million for Lockerbie North OS01iii active open space construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk reading: 2029-2030: Council schedules $20.493 million for Lockerbie North C02iv community centre construction year 3. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk reading: 2029-2030: Council schedules $0.032 million for Lockerbie North OS04i sports pavilion planning and design year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk reading: 2029-2030: Council schedules $0.025 million for Lockerbie North OS05i sports pavilion planning and design year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk reading: 2029-2030: Council schedules $0.205 million for Lockerbie North OS03i active open space planning and design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk reading: 2030-2031: Council schedules $0.295 million for Lockerbie North C03i community centre planning. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk reading: 2030-2031: Council schedules $0.302 million for Lockerbie North OS04ii sports pavilion planning and design year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk reading: 2030-2031: Council schedules $0.229 million for Lockerbie North OS05ii sports pavilion planning and design year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk reading: 2030-2031: Council schedules $1.913 million for Lockerbie North OS03ii active open space construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $0.826 million for Lockerbie North C03ii community centre design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $0.911 million for Lockerbie North OS04iii sports pavilion construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $0.692 million for Lockerbie North OS05iii sports pavilion construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $8.616 million for Lockerbie North OS03iii active open space construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $10.247 million for Lockerbie North C03iii community centre construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk reading: 2032-2033: Council schedules $0.911 million for Lockerbie North OS04iv sports pavilion construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk reading: 2032-2033: Council schedules $0.692 million for Lockerbie North OS05iv sports pavilion construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk reading: 2032-2033: Council schedules $8.616 million for Lockerbie North OS03iv active open space construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk reading: 2033-2034: Council schedules $10.247 million for Lockerbie North C03iv community centre construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk reading: 2026-2027: Council schedules $0.155 million for Lockerbie North Indoor Recreation (F) pre-planning. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk reading: Gross-to-net feasibility must subtract the 9.15% public-open-space contribution from Net Developable Area assumptions before residual land-value testing. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk reading: The 5.9% active-open-space component is not interchangeable with passive open space because it must accommodate sports fields, courts, pavilions, lighting, and high-use turf or synthetic-surface decisions. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Risk reading: The 3.24% passive-open-space component matters for walkability and neighbourhood amenity but does not by itself satisfy the 17.5 hectare active-playing-space program. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk reading: Because the 8.0 hectare reserve is co-located with an indoor recreation facility and a school, delivery risk includes education-land timing and indoor-recreation funding risk. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk reading: Because the 9.5 hectare reserve is co-located with schools and court-based sport, feasibility includes peak traffic, safe access, car parking, lighting spill, and shared-use governance. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Risk reading: The $104.334 million Lockerbie North ledger shows that development feasibility is exposed to municipal capital timing as well as private subdivision timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Risk reading: The $58.096 million confirmed-contribution component reduces but does not eliminate delivery risk because confirmed contributions still have to arrive on the schedule assumed by Council. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Risk reading: The $46.083 million reserve-funded component depends on restricted reserves being sufficient and available for the specific project purposes. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Risk reading: The $0.155 million indoor recreation pre-planning item is a small dollar amount relative to the ledger but a large dependency signal because it is fully unconfirmed grant dependent. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk reading: The budget warning that development contributions rarely fully fund identified infrastructure means DCP feasibility should include escalation and funding-gap sensitivity tests. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk reading: The budget warning that market conditions affect contribution flows means slower lot sales can delay infrastructure that later residents still need. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk reading: The financial-plan expectation of $93.66 million in 2026-2027 works-in-kind across several growth areas means developer capacity and agreement timing are material to Council-wide delivery. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Risk reading: The Beveridge Central reliance on Lockerbie North tennis facilities means delay in Lockerbie North courts can produce service deficits outside the Lockerbie North boundary. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Risk reading: The projected Beveridge growth to 112,187 people by 2046 means active-open-space under-delivery compounds across a much larger future catchment than the 2024 population of 9,120. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Risk reading: The 2024 demand estimate of 42 cricket teams and 88 soccer teams means field demand is already measurable before the full 2046 population is reached. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Risk reading: The railway-line barrier between Donnybrook, Lockerbie, and Lockerbie North means cross-boundary service sharing is only feasible if physical access is resolved. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk reading: Lockerbie North being outside the Wallan Regional Park study area means developers should not assume future regional-park land acquisition will directly offset local open-space obligations. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk reading: Mount Fraser being outside Lockerbie North means the precinct cannot claim Mount Fraser as an internal open-space asset even though it shapes the broader landscape identity. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Risk reading: The completed status of Lockerbie North reduces planning uncertainty but increases the importance of the approved DCP, because later additions to regional open space would generally require purchase or another acquisition mechanism. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk reading: The absence of the primary PSP and DCP documents in the local corpus prevents verification of charge areas, dwelling yield, road hierarchy, drainage obligations, and parcel-specific staging. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Risk reading: No primary submissions on the Lockerbie North PSP were located in the requested extracted Mitchell corpus. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Risk reading: No planning panel report for Lockerbie North was located in the requested extracted Mitchell corpus. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Risk reading: No advisory committee report specific to Lockerbie North was located in the requested extracted Mitchell corpus. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Risk reading: No primary DCP charge table for Lockerbie North was located in the requested extracted Mitchell corpus. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Risk reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work records contested quarry issues in nearby precincts, including proposed quarry impacts around Spring Hill, but not inside the completed Lockerbie North PSP. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work states that the completed Lockerbie North PSP did not reference the future WRP, which creates a policy coordination issue rather than a submission issue in the available corpus. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Risk reading: The Beveridge Central master plan shows a facility-program shift from tennis at Beveridge Central toward small-sided soccer, with tennis provision relying on Lockerbie North active open spaces. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Risk reading: The sports-field study and Beveridge Central master plan describe different southern Lockerbie North reserve mixes, so the final statutory reserve program requires primary PSP or later Council confirmation. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Risk reading: The 9.15% total open-space rate and 5.9% plus 3.24% component rates contain a 0.01 percentage-point arithmetic discrepancy, so downstream calculations should use the published total unless the primary DCP confirms otherwise. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Risk reading: The budget states that development-contribution funding depends on market timing, so the capital ledger should be read as a programmed sequence rather than a guarantee of actual completion dates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Risk reading: The financial plan separates confirmed and unconfirmed grants or contributions, so items with unconfirmed funding should not be treated as fully funded. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Risk reading: The local corpus contains duplicate-named extracts for the Wallan Regional Park feasibility report and the Mitchell sports-field feasibility study, so duplicate evidence should not be double counted. (Source: local filesystem inventory)

Dependency reading

Dependency reading: Lockerbie North is listed by the Wallan Regional Park feasibility work as a completed PSP, with the PSP dated 2012 in the completed-precinct table. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility table states that Lockerbie North is south of Mount Fraser and outside the Wallan Regional Park study area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency reading: The same feasibility table states that Lockerbie North does not contain major natural assets that would lend themselves to incorporation in the Wallan Regional Park. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency reading: The same feasibility table states that 27 hectares of active and passive open space is included in the Lockerbie North PSP. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency reading: The same feasibility table states that the approved Lockerbie North PSP does not reference the future Wallan Regional Park. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency reading: Lockerbie North has a total public-open-space contribution of 9.15% of Net Developable Area. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency reading: The Lockerbie North public-open-space contribution is split into 5.9% active open space and 3.24% passive open space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency reading: The published active and passive components sum to 9.14%, which is 0.01 percentage points below the published total of 9.15%, so the available source contains a rounding discrepancy. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency reading: Lockerbie PSP is a useful comparator because it has an 8.33% public-open-space contribution, split into 6.30% active open space and 2.03% passive open space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency reading: Lockerbie North therefore has a 0.82 percentage-point higher total open-space contribution than Lockerbie PSP. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency reading: Lockerbie North has a 0.40 percentage-point lower active-open-space component than Lockerbie PSP. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency reading: Lockerbie North has a 1.21 percentage-point higher passive-open-space component than Lockerbie PSP. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency reading: Lockerbie North includes 17.5 hectares of active playing space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency reading: The 17.5 hectares of active playing space is made up of one 8.0 hectare reserve and one 9.5 hectare reserve. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency reading: The 8.0 hectare reserve includes two full-size Australian Rules football and cricket ovals, cricket nets, and a playground. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency reading: The 8.0 hectare reserve is to be located with an indoor recreation facility and a state primary/secondary school. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency reading: The 9.5 hectare southern reserve includes either two full-size Australian Rules football and cricket ovals or three full-size soccer fields. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency reading: The 9.5 hectare southern reserve includes cricket nets, six tennis courts, two netball courts, and a playground. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency reading: The 9.5 hectare southern reserve is co-located with a state primary school and a potential non-government school. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency reading: The Beveridge Central Active Open Space Master Plan describes the adjacent Lockerbie North PSP northern active open space as 8.0 hectares with two ovals, six tennis courts, and two netball or tennis courts. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Dependency reading: The Beveridge Central Active Open Space Master Plan describes the Lockerbie North PSP southern active open space as 9.5 hectares with two ovals, two overlaid rectangular pitches, one athletics track, and six tennis courts. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Dependency reading: The later Beveridge Central evidence changes the southern reserve emphasis from three full-size soccer fields to two overlaid rectangular pitches plus one athletics track. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Dependency reading: Beveridge Central AOS is planned for soccer and cricket, while tennis demand is expected to be served in coming years by the two active open spaces in the adjacent Lockerbie North PSP. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Dependency reading: Beveridge had an estimated 2024 population of 9,120 and is forecast to exceed 112,000 people by 2046. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Dependency reading: The Beveridge Central demand table estimates 639 cricket participants in 2024, equivalent to 42 cricket teams. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Dependency reading: The Beveridge Central demand table estimates 1,322 soccer participants in 2024, equivalent to 88 soccer teams. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Dependency reading: The same demand table translates 42 cricket teams into six cricket ovals using a six-to-seven-team-per-oval benchmark. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Dependency reading: The same demand table translates 88 soccer teams into 11 soccer pitches using a seven-to-eight-team-per-pitch benchmark. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Dependency reading: Donnybrook PSP is expected to join future Lockerbie and Lockerbie North developments, and residents are expected to share facilities and services across council boundaries. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency reading: The existing railway line is identified as a physical barrier that will need to be resolved for shared facilities and services. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency reading: Mitchell Shire had more than 64,000 residents in the 2025-2026 budget context and expects more than 221,000 residents by 2046. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency reading: Mitchell Shire expects continued growth beyond 2046 toward 250,000 residents. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency reading: The budget forecasts population growth of 7.34% in 2025-2026, 7.47% in 2026-2027, 7.16% in 2027-2028, and 7.12% in 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency reading: The financial plan forecasts developer contributions of $27.056 million in 2025-2026,$ 27.524 million in 2026-2027, $30.047 million in 2027-2028, and$ 19.367 million in 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Dependency reading: The budget forecasts non-monetary contributions of $60.859 million in 2025-2026,$ 123.668 million in 2026-2027, $59.247 million in 2027-2028, and$ 68.419 million in 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency reading: The financial plan says non-monetary asset handovers are forecast at $28.00 million in 2025-2026 and increase by$ 2.00 million each year until reaching $40.00 million in 2031-2032. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Dependency reading: The financial plan attributes the 2026-2027 non-monetary contribution spike to $93.66 million of anticipated developer-delivered works-in-kind, predominantly in Beveridge Central, Beveridge North West, Kilmore South East, Lockerbie, and Lockerbie North. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Dependency reading: The budget states that development contributions are collected as development proceeds. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency reading: The budget states that development-contribution flows create cash-flow challenges for Council. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency reading: The budget identifies borrowings, partnerships, works-in-kind processes, and grant advocacy as mitigation measures for development-contribution cash-flow challenges. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency reading: The budget states that development contributions rarely provide sufficient funding for the infrastructure identified. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency reading: The budget states that delays between contribution collection and infrastructure delivery can exacerbate the infrastructure funding gap. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency reading: The budget states that development contributions and infrastructure funding depend on market conditions and development timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency reading: The financial plan says developer contributions are transferred to restricted reserves until used for specific capital-works purposes. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Dependency reading: The financial plan says developer contributions often require Council to outlay funds before receiving developer contributions. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Dependency reading: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies Mount Fraser as outside the Lockerbie North PSP. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Dependency reading: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies Bald Hill as within the Lockerbie PSP area, not the Lockerbie North PSP area. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Dependency reading: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies volcanic cones including Bald Hill, Mount Fraser, Spring Hill, and Green Hill as regional open-space elements in the southern growth area. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Dependency reading: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies Hernes Swamp as part of the potential southern-growth-area regional park system. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Dependency reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work says completed PSPs such as Lockerbie North cannot use the PSP process to acquire additional Wallan Regional Park land without purchase or another mechanism. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work says land for the future regional park should be identified in PSPs and transferred under ICPs where possible to avoid purchase. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work identifies Public Acquisition Overlays as a mechanism for land not transferable under a PSP or ICP. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work identifies GAIC works-in-kind agreements as a possible mechanism for regional or state-level public purposes. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency reading: Urban-growth sequencing: the Wallan Regional Park feasibility report describes PSPs as the primary mechanism for designating future land uses in growth areas such as Wallan-Beveridge, including subdivision form and long-term development guidance. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency reading: Infrastructure-plan coupling: the same report states that PSPs include provision of land or funds for public infrastructure under an Infrastructure Contributions Plan for each PSP area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency reading: Completed-PSP lock-in: once a PSP is complete, the report says there is no longer the opportunity to acquire land through that PSP process, so alternative compulsory acquisition would be required. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency reading: Open-space land take: a 9.15% public-open-space contribution removes part of the Net Developable Area from saleable development and converts it into public active and passive open space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency reading: Active-open-space intensity: 17.5 hectares across two reserves creates a dual-reserve sports network rather than a single oval, which changes maintenance, pavilion, lighting, parking, and school-interface requirements. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency reading: Co-location mechanism: the 8.0 hectare reserve is tied to an indoor recreation facility and a state primary/secondary school, so its feasibility depends on school-site and indoor-recreation staging as well as reserve construction. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency reading: Education interface: the 9.5 hectare reserve is tied to a state primary school and potential non-government school, so shared access, traffic peaks, and safety interfaces become development-sequencing issues. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency reading: Cross-precinct service sharing: Donnybrook, Lockerbie, and Lockerbie North are expected to share facilities and services, which makes railway-line resolution a practical condition of service equity. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency reading: DCP cash-flow mechanism: the budget says contributions are collected as development proceeds, so early works may occur before all liable land has paid its share. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency reading: Restricted-reserve mechanism: the financial plan says developer contributions are transferred to restricted reserves until used for specific capital-works purposes. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Dependency reading: Works-in-kind mechanism: the financial plan distinguishes gifted assets from infrastructure delivered by developers as works-in-kind agreed before Council receives contributions and delivers works itself. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Dependency reading: Funding-gap mechanism: the budget says development contributions rarely provide sufficient funding for identified infrastructure, which creates a structural gap between DCP schedules and actual delivery costs. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency reading: Market-timing mechanism: the budget says development contributions and infrastructure funding depend on market conditions and development timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency reading: Grant-risk mechanism: the indoor recreation pre-planning line is $0.155 million and is listed as unconfirmed grant dependent, so it is not equivalent to a fully funded project. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Dependency reading: Regional-park exclusion mechanism: Lockerbie North is outside the WRP study area and has no major natural assets identified for WRP inclusion, so its regional-open-space role is indirect rather than land-supply based. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency reading: Landscape-context mechanism: Mount Fraser being outside the Lockerbie North PSP means volcanic-cone protection and interpretation sit in adjacent precinct and regional-park planning rather than inside Lockerbie North land budgets. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Dependency reading: Beveridge-service mechanism: Beveridge Central defers tennis provision to Lockerbie North facilities, which means Lockerbie North tennis delivery affects Beveridge Central service adequacy. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Dependency reading: Sports-demand mechanism: Beveridge Central calculates 42 cricket teams and 88 soccer teams in 2024, so active-open-space delivery is driven by participation conversion, not only population totals. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Dependency reading: Facility-capacity mechanism: the benchmark of six to seven cricket teams per oval and seven to eight soccer teams per pitch translates participation counts into land and field requirements. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Dependency reading: Capital-stage mechanism: planning, design, construction year 1, construction year 2, and construction year 3 lines show that a DCP item becomes useful only after a multi-year project lifecycle. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Dependency reading: 2012: Lockerbie North is treated as a completed PSP in the Wallan Regional Park feasibility table. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency reading: 2013: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies Mount Fraser as outside the Lockerbie North PSP and identifies southern-growth-area regional-park opportunities. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Dependency reading: 2014: The Sports Field Feasibility Study identifies Lockerbie and Lockerbie North as the two approved PSPs affecting parts of Mitchell Shire in this growth area. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency reading: 2014: The Sports Field Feasibility Study records Lockerbie North public open space at 9.15% of Net Developable Area. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency reading: 2014: The Sports Field Feasibility Study records 17.5 hectares of active playing space in Lockerbie North. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency reading: 2022: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work states that Lockerbie North is approved, south of Mount Fraser, and outside the WRP study area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency reading: 2024: Beveridge Central AOS uses estimated 2024 Beveridge population of 9,120 to calculate current sport demand. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Dependency reading: 2025-2026: Council schedules $0.311 million for Lockerbie North IT08i pedestrian signals. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency reading: 2026-2027: Council schedules $0.249 million for Lockerbie North C02i community centre planning. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency reading: 2026-2027: Council schedules $0.216 million for Lockerbie North OS02i sports pavilion design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency reading: 2026-2027: Council schedules $1.053 million for Lockerbie North OS01i active open space design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency reading: 2027-2028: Council schedules $5.185 million for Lockerbie North C02ii community centre design and construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency reading: 2027-2028: Council schedules $0.971 million for Lockerbie North OS02ii sports pavilion construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency reading: 2027-2028: Council schedules $4.739 million for Lockerbie North OS01ii active open space construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency reading: 2028-2029: Council schedules $20.493 million for Lockerbie North C02iii community centre construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency reading: 2028-2029: Council schedules $0.971 million for Lockerbie North OS02iii sports pavilion construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency reading: 2028-2029: Council schedules $4.739 million for Lockerbie North OS01iii active open space construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency reading: 2029-2030: Council schedules $20.493 million for Lockerbie North C02iv community centre construction year 3. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency reading: 2029-2030: Council schedules $0.032 million for Lockerbie North OS04i sports pavilion planning and design year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency reading: 2029-2030: Council schedules $0.025 million for Lockerbie North OS05i sports pavilion planning and design year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency reading: 2029-2030: Council schedules $0.205 million for Lockerbie North OS03i active open space planning and design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency reading: 2030-2031: Council schedules $0.295 million for Lockerbie North C03i community centre planning. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency reading: 2030-2031: Council schedules $0.302 million for Lockerbie North OS04ii sports pavilion planning and design year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency reading: 2030-2031: Council schedules $0.229 million for Lockerbie North OS05ii sports pavilion planning and design year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency reading: 2030-2031: Council schedules $1.913 million for Lockerbie North OS03ii active open space construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $0.826 million for Lockerbie North C03ii community centre design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $0.911 million for Lockerbie North OS04iii sports pavilion construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $0.692 million for Lockerbie North OS05iii sports pavilion construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $8.616 million for Lockerbie North OS03iii active open space construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $10.247 million for Lockerbie North C03iii community centre construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency reading: 2032-2033: Council schedules $0.911 million for Lockerbie North OS04iv sports pavilion construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency reading: 2032-2033: Council schedules $0.692 million for Lockerbie North OS05iv sports pavilion construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency reading: 2032-2033: Council schedules $8.616 million for Lockerbie North OS03iv active open space construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency reading: 2033-2034: Council schedules $10.247 million for Lockerbie North C03iv community centre construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency reading: 2026-2027: Council schedules $0.155 million for Lockerbie North Indoor Recreation (F) pre-planning. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency reading: Gross-to-net feasibility must subtract the 9.15% public-open-space contribution from Net Developable Area assumptions before residual land-value testing. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency reading: The 5.9% active-open-space component is not interchangeable with passive open space because it must accommodate sports fields, courts, pavilions, lighting, and high-use turf or synthetic-surface decisions. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Dependency reading: The 3.24% passive-open-space component matters for walkability and neighbourhood amenity but does not by itself satisfy the 17.5 hectare active-playing-space program. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency reading: Because the 8.0 hectare reserve is co-located with an indoor recreation facility and a school, delivery risk includes education-land timing and indoor-recreation funding risk. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency reading: Because the 9.5 hectare reserve is co-located with schools and court-based sport, feasibility includes peak traffic, safe access, car parking, lighting spill, and shared-use governance. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Dependency reading: The $104.334 million Lockerbie North ledger shows that development feasibility is exposed to municipal capital timing as well as private subdivision timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Dependency reading: The $58.096 million confirmed-contribution component reduces but does not eliminate delivery risk because confirmed contributions still have to arrive on the schedule assumed by Council. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Dependency reading: The $46.083 million reserve-funded component depends on restricted reserves being sufficient and available for the specific project purposes. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Dependency reading: The $0.155 million indoor recreation pre-planning item is a small dollar amount relative to the ledger but a large dependency signal because it is fully unconfirmed grant dependent. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency reading: The budget warning that development contributions rarely fully fund identified infrastructure means DCP feasibility should include escalation and funding-gap sensitivity tests. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency reading: The budget warning that market conditions affect contribution flows means slower lot sales can delay infrastructure that later residents still need. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency reading: The financial-plan expectation of $93.66 million in 2026-2027 works-in-kind across several growth areas means developer capacity and agreement timing are material to Council-wide delivery. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Dependency reading: The Beveridge Central reliance on Lockerbie North tennis facilities means delay in Lockerbie North courts can produce service deficits outside the Lockerbie North boundary. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Dependency reading: The projected Beveridge growth to 112,187 people by 2046 means active-open-space under-delivery compounds across a much larger future catchment than the 2024 population of 9,120. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Dependency reading: The 2024 demand estimate of 42 cricket teams and 88 soccer teams means field demand is already measurable before the full 2046 population is reached. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Dependency reading: The railway-line barrier between Donnybrook, Lockerbie, and Lockerbie North means cross-boundary service sharing is only feasible if physical access is resolved. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency reading: Lockerbie North being outside the Wallan Regional Park study area means developers should not assume future regional-park land acquisition will directly offset local open-space obligations. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency reading: Mount Fraser being outside Lockerbie North means the precinct cannot claim Mount Fraser as an internal open-space asset even though it shapes the broader landscape identity. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Dependency reading: The completed status of Lockerbie North reduces planning uncertainty but increases the importance of the approved DCP, because later additions to regional open space would generally require purchase or another acquisition mechanism. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency reading: The absence of the primary PSP and DCP documents in the local corpus prevents verification of charge areas, dwelling yield, road hierarchy, drainage obligations, and parcel-specific staging. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Dependency reading: No primary submissions on the Lockerbie North PSP were located in the requested extracted Mitchell corpus. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Dependency reading: No planning panel report for Lockerbie North was located in the requested extracted Mitchell corpus. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Dependency reading: No advisory committee report specific to Lockerbie North was located in the requested extracted Mitchell corpus. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Dependency reading: No primary DCP charge table for Lockerbie North was located in the requested extracted Mitchell corpus. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Dependency reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work records contested quarry issues in nearby precincts, including proposed quarry impacts around Spring Hill, but not inside the completed Lockerbie North PSP. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work states that the completed Lockerbie North PSP did not reference the future WRP, which creates a policy coordination issue rather than a submission issue in the available corpus. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Dependency reading: The Beveridge Central master plan shows a facility-program shift from tennis at Beveridge Central toward small-sided soccer, with tennis provision relying on Lockerbie North active open spaces. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Dependency reading: The sports-field study and Beveridge Central master plan describe different southern Lockerbie North reserve mixes, so the final statutory reserve program requires primary PSP or later Council confirmation. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Dependency reading: The 9.15% total open-space rate and 5.9% plus 3.24% component rates contain a 0.01 percentage-point arithmetic discrepancy, so downstream calculations should use the published total unless the primary DCP confirms otherwise. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Dependency reading: The budget states that development-contribution funding depends on market timing, so the capital ledger should be read as a programmed sequence rather than a guarantee of actual completion dates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Dependency reading: The financial plan separates confirmed and unconfirmed grants or contributions, so items with unconfirmed funding should not be treated as fully funded. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Dependency reading: The local corpus contains duplicate-named extracts for the Wallan Regional Park feasibility report and the Mitchell sports-field feasibility study, so duplicate evidence should not be double counted. (Source: local filesystem inventory)

Cross-precinct reading

Cross-precinct reading: Lockerbie North is listed by the Wallan Regional Park feasibility work as a completed PSP, with the PSP dated 2012 in the completed-precinct table. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility table states that Lockerbie North is south of Mount Fraser and outside the Wallan Regional Park study area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The same feasibility table states that Lockerbie North does not contain major natural assets that would lend themselves to incorporation in the Wallan Regional Park. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The same feasibility table states that 27 hectares of active and passive open space is included in the Lockerbie North PSP. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The same feasibility table states that the approved Lockerbie North PSP does not reference the future Wallan Regional Park. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: Lockerbie North has a total public-open-space contribution of 9.15% of Net Developable Area. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The Lockerbie North public-open-space contribution is split into 5.9% active open space and 3.24% passive open space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The published active and passive components sum to 9.14%, which is 0.01 percentage points below the published total of 9.15%, so the available source contains a rounding discrepancy. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: Lockerbie PSP is a useful comparator because it has an 8.33% public-open-space contribution, split into 6.30% active open space and 2.03% passive open space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: Lockerbie North therefore has a 0.82 percentage-point higher total open-space contribution than Lockerbie PSP. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: Lockerbie North has a 0.40 percentage-point lower active-open-space component than Lockerbie PSP. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: Lockerbie North has a 1.21 percentage-point higher passive-open-space component than Lockerbie PSP. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: Lockerbie North includes 17.5 hectares of active playing space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The 17.5 hectares of active playing space is made up of one 8.0 hectare reserve and one 9.5 hectare reserve. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The 8.0 hectare reserve includes two full-size Australian Rules football and cricket ovals, cricket nets, and a playground. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The 8.0 hectare reserve is to be located with an indoor recreation facility and a state primary/secondary school. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The 9.5 hectare southern reserve includes either two full-size Australian Rules football and cricket ovals or three full-size soccer fields. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The 9.5 hectare southern reserve includes cricket nets, six tennis courts, two netball courts, and a playground. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The 9.5 hectare southern reserve is co-located with a state primary school and a potential non-government school. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The Beveridge Central Active Open Space Master Plan describes the adjacent Lockerbie North PSP northern active open space as 8.0 hectares with two ovals, six tennis courts, and two netball or tennis courts. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The Beveridge Central Active Open Space Master Plan describes the Lockerbie North PSP southern active open space as 9.5 hectares with two ovals, two overlaid rectangular pitches, one athletics track, and six tennis courts. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The later Beveridge Central evidence changes the southern reserve emphasis from three full-size soccer fields to two overlaid rectangular pitches plus one athletics track. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: Beveridge Central AOS is planned for soccer and cricket, while tennis demand is expected to be served in coming years by the two active open spaces in the adjacent Lockerbie North PSP. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: Beveridge had an estimated 2024 population of 9,120 and is forecast to exceed 112,000 people by 2046. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The Beveridge Central demand table estimates 639 cricket participants in 2024, equivalent to 42 cricket teams. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The Beveridge Central demand table estimates 1,322 soccer participants in 2024, equivalent to 88 soccer teams. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The same demand table translates 42 cricket teams into six cricket ovals using a six-to-seven-team-per-oval benchmark. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The same demand table translates 88 soccer teams into 11 soccer pitches using a seven-to-eight-team-per-pitch benchmark. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: Donnybrook PSP is expected to join future Lockerbie and Lockerbie North developments, and residents are expected to share facilities and services across council boundaries. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The existing railway line is identified as a physical barrier that will need to be resolved for shared facilities and services. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: Mitchell Shire had more than 64,000 residents in the 2025-2026 budget context and expects more than 221,000 residents by 2046. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: Mitchell Shire expects continued growth beyond 2046 toward 250,000 residents. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The budget forecasts population growth of 7.34% in 2025-2026, 7.47% in 2026-2027, 7.16% in 2027-2028, and 7.12% in 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The financial plan forecasts developer contributions of $27.056 million in 2025-2026,$ 27.524 million in 2026-2027, $30.047 million in 2027-2028, and$ 19.367 million in 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The budget forecasts non-monetary contributions of $60.859 million in 2025-2026,$ 123.668 million in 2026-2027, $59.247 million in 2027-2028, and$ 68.419 million in 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The financial plan says non-monetary asset handovers are forecast at $28.00 million in 2025-2026 and increase by$ 2.00 million each year until reaching $40.00 million in 2031-2032. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The financial plan attributes the 2026-2027 non-monetary contribution spike to $93.66 million of anticipated developer-delivered works-in-kind, predominantly in Beveridge Central, Beveridge North West, Kilmore South East, Lockerbie, and Lockerbie North. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The budget states that development contributions are collected as development proceeds. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The budget states that development-contribution flows create cash-flow challenges for Council. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The budget identifies borrowings, partnerships, works-in-kind processes, and grant advocacy as mitigation measures for development-contribution cash-flow challenges. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The budget states that development contributions rarely provide sufficient funding for the infrastructure identified. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The budget states that delays between contribution collection and infrastructure delivery can exacerbate the infrastructure funding gap. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The budget states that development contributions and infrastructure funding depend on market conditions and development timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The financial plan says developer contributions are transferred to restricted reserves until used for specific capital-works purposes. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The financial plan says developer contributions often require Council to outlay funds before receiving developer contributions. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies Mount Fraser as outside the Lockerbie North PSP. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies Bald Hill as within the Lockerbie PSP area, not the Lockerbie North PSP area. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies volcanic cones including Bald Hill, Mount Fraser, Spring Hill, and Green Hill as regional open-space elements in the southern growth area. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies Hernes Swamp as part of the potential southern-growth-area regional park system. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work says completed PSPs such as Lockerbie North cannot use the PSP process to acquire additional Wallan Regional Park land without purchase or another mechanism. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work says land for the future regional park should be identified in PSPs and transferred under ICPs where possible to avoid purchase. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work identifies Public Acquisition Overlays as a mechanism for land not transferable under a PSP or ICP. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work identifies GAIC works-in-kind agreements as a possible mechanism for regional or state-level public purposes. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: Urban-growth sequencing: the Wallan Regional Park feasibility report describes PSPs as the primary mechanism for designating future land uses in growth areas such as Wallan-Beveridge, including subdivision form and long-term development guidance. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: Infrastructure-plan coupling: the same report states that PSPs include provision of land or funds for public infrastructure under an Infrastructure Contributions Plan for each PSP area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: Completed-PSP lock-in: once a PSP is complete, the report says there is no longer the opportunity to acquire land through that PSP process, so alternative compulsory acquisition would be required. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: Open-space land take: a 9.15% public-open-space contribution removes part of the Net Developable Area from saleable development and converts it into public active and passive open space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: Active-open-space intensity: 17.5 hectares across two reserves creates a dual-reserve sports network rather than a single oval, which changes maintenance, pavilion, lighting, parking, and school-interface requirements. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: Co-location mechanism: the 8.0 hectare reserve is tied to an indoor recreation facility and a state primary/secondary school, so its feasibility depends on school-site and indoor-recreation staging as well as reserve construction. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: Education interface: the 9.5 hectare reserve is tied to a state primary school and potential non-government school, so shared access, traffic peaks, and safety interfaces become development-sequencing issues. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: Cross-precinct service sharing: Donnybrook, Lockerbie, and Lockerbie North are expected to share facilities and services, which makes railway-line resolution a practical condition of service equity. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: DCP cash-flow mechanism: the budget says contributions are collected as development proceeds, so early works may occur before all liable land has paid its share. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: Restricted-reserve mechanism: the financial plan says developer contributions are transferred to restricted reserves until used for specific capital-works purposes. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: Works-in-kind mechanism: the financial plan distinguishes gifted assets from infrastructure delivered by developers as works-in-kind agreed before Council receives contributions and delivers works itself. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: Funding-gap mechanism: the budget says development contributions rarely provide sufficient funding for identified infrastructure, which creates a structural gap between DCP schedules and actual delivery costs. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: Market-timing mechanism: the budget says development contributions and infrastructure funding depend on market conditions and development timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: Grant-risk mechanism: the indoor recreation pre-planning line is $0.155 million and is listed as unconfirmed grant dependent, so it is not equivalent to a fully funded project. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: Regional-park exclusion mechanism: Lockerbie North is outside the WRP study area and has no major natural assets identified for WRP inclusion, so its regional-open-space role is indirect rather than land-supply based. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: Landscape-context mechanism: Mount Fraser being outside the Lockerbie North PSP means volcanic-cone protection and interpretation sit in adjacent precinct and regional-park planning rather than inside Lockerbie North land budgets. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: Beveridge-service mechanism: Beveridge Central defers tennis provision to Lockerbie North facilities, which means Lockerbie North tennis delivery affects Beveridge Central service adequacy. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: Sports-demand mechanism: Beveridge Central calculates 42 cricket teams and 88 soccer teams in 2024, so active-open-space delivery is driven by participation conversion, not only population totals. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: Facility-capacity mechanism: the benchmark of six to seven cricket teams per oval and seven to eight soccer teams per pitch translates participation counts into land and field requirements. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: Capital-stage mechanism: planning, design, construction year 1, construction year 2, and construction year 3 lines show that a DCP item becomes useful only after a multi-year project lifecycle. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: 2012: Lockerbie North is treated as a completed PSP in the Wallan Regional Park feasibility table. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: 2013: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies Mount Fraser as outside the Lockerbie North PSP and identifies southern-growth-area regional-park opportunities. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: 2014: The Sports Field Feasibility Study identifies Lockerbie and Lockerbie North as the two approved PSPs affecting parts of Mitchell Shire in this growth area. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: 2014: The Sports Field Feasibility Study records Lockerbie North public open space at 9.15% of Net Developable Area. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: 2014: The Sports Field Feasibility Study records 17.5 hectares of active playing space in Lockerbie North. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: 2022: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work states that Lockerbie North is approved, south of Mount Fraser, and outside the WRP study area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: 2024: Beveridge Central AOS uses estimated 2024 Beveridge population of 9,120 to calculate current sport demand. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: 2025-2026: Council schedules $0.311 million for Lockerbie North IT08i pedestrian signals. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: 2026-2027: Council schedules $0.249 million for Lockerbie North C02i community centre planning. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: 2026-2027: Council schedules $0.216 million for Lockerbie North OS02i sports pavilion design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: 2026-2027: Council schedules $1.053 million for Lockerbie North OS01i active open space design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: 2027-2028: Council schedules $5.185 million for Lockerbie North C02ii community centre design and construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: 2027-2028: Council schedules $0.971 million for Lockerbie North OS02ii sports pavilion construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: 2027-2028: Council schedules $4.739 million for Lockerbie North OS01ii active open space construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: 2028-2029: Council schedules $20.493 million for Lockerbie North C02iii community centre construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: 2028-2029: Council schedules $0.971 million for Lockerbie North OS02iii sports pavilion construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: 2028-2029: Council schedules $4.739 million for Lockerbie North OS01iii active open space construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: 2029-2030: Council schedules $20.493 million for Lockerbie North C02iv community centre construction year 3. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: 2029-2030: Council schedules $0.032 million for Lockerbie North OS04i sports pavilion planning and design year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: 2029-2030: Council schedules $0.025 million for Lockerbie North OS05i sports pavilion planning and design year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: 2029-2030: Council schedules $0.205 million for Lockerbie North OS03i active open space planning and design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: 2030-2031: Council schedules $0.295 million for Lockerbie North C03i community centre planning. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: 2030-2031: Council schedules $0.302 million for Lockerbie North OS04ii sports pavilion planning and design year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: 2030-2031: Council schedules $0.229 million for Lockerbie North OS05ii sports pavilion planning and design year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: 2030-2031: Council schedules $1.913 million for Lockerbie North OS03ii active open space construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $0.826 million for Lockerbie North C03ii community centre design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $0.911 million for Lockerbie North OS04iii sports pavilion construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $0.692 million for Lockerbie North OS05iii sports pavilion construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $8.616 million for Lockerbie North OS03iii active open space construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $10.247 million for Lockerbie North C03iii community centre construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: 2032-2033: Council schedules $0.911 million for Lockerbie North OS04iv sports pavilion construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: 2032-2033: Council schedules $0.692 million for Lockerbie North OS05iv sports pavilion construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: 2032-2033: Council schedules $8.616 million for Lockerbie North OS03iv active open space construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: 2033-2034: Council schedules $10.247 million for Lockerbie North C03iv community centre construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: 2026-2027: Council schedules $0.155 million for Lockerbie North Indoor Recreation (F) pre-planning. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: Gross-to-net feasibility must subtract the 9.15% public-open-space contribution from Net Developable Area assumptions before residual land-value testing. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The 5.9% active-open-space component is not interchangeable with passive open space because it must accommodate sports fields, courts, pavilions, lighting, and high-use turf or synthetic-surface decisions. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The 3.24% passive-open-space component matters for walkability and neighbourhood amenity but does not by itself satisfy the 17.5 hectare active-playing-space program. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: Because the 8.0 hectare reserve is co-located with an indoor recreation facility and a school, delivery risk includes education-land timing and indoor-recreation funding risk. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: Because the 9.5 hectare reserve is co-located with schools and court-based sport, feasibility includes peak traffic, safe access, car parking, lighting spill, and shared-use governance. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The $104.334 million Lockerbie North ledger shows that development feasibility is exposed to municipal capital timing as well as private subdivision timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The $58.096 million confirmed-contribution component reduces but does not eliminate delivery risk because confirmed contributions still have to arrive on the schedule assumed by Council. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The $46.083 million reserve-funded component depends on restricted reserves being sufficient and available for the specific project purposes. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The $0.155 million indoor recreation pre-planning item is a small dollar amount relative to the ledger but a large dependency signal because it is fully unconfirmed grant dependent. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The budget warning that development contributions rarely fully fund identified infrastructure means DCP feasibility should include escalation and funding-gap sensitivity tests. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The budget warning that market conditions affect contribution flows means slower lot sales can delay infrastructure that later residents still need. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The financial-plan expectation of $93.66 million in 2026-2027 works-in-kind across several growth areas means developer capacity and agreement timing are material to Council-wide delivery. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The Beveridge Central reliance on Lockerbie North tennis facilities means delay in Lockerbie North courts can produce service deficits outside the Lockerbie North boundary. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The projected Beveridge growth to 112,187 people by 2046 means active-open-space under-delivery compounds across a much larger future catchment than the 2024 population of 9,120. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The 2024 demand estimate of 42 cricket teams and 88 soccer teams means field demand is already measurable before the full 2046 population is reached. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The railway-line barrier between Donnybrook, Lockerbie, and Lockerbie North means cross-boundary service sharing is only feasible if physical access is resolved. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: Lockerbie North being outside the Wallan Regional Park study area means developers should not assume future regional-park land acquisition will directly offset local open-space obligations. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: Mount Fraser being outside Lockerbie North means the precinct cannot claim Mount Fraser as an internal open-space asset even though it shapes the broader landscape identity. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The completed status of Lockerbie North reduces planning uncertainty but increases the importance of the approved DCP, because later additions to regional open space would generally require purchase or another acquisition mechanism. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The absence of the primary PSP and DCP documents in the local corpus prevents verification of charge areas, dwelling yield, road hierarchy, drainage obligations, and parcel-specific staging. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Cross-precinct reading: No primary submissions on the Lockerbie North PSP were located in the requested extracted Mitchell corpus. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Cross-precinct reading: No planning panel report for Lockerbie North was located in the requested extracted Mitchell corpus. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Cross-precinct reading: No advisory committee report specific to Lockerbie North was located in the requested extracted Mitchell corpus. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Cross-precinct reading: No primary DCP charge table for Lockerbie North was located in the requested extracted Mitchell corpus. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Cross-precinct reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work records contested quarry issues in nearby precincts, including proposed quarry impacts around Spring Hill, but not inside the completed Lockerbie North PSP. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work states that the completed Lockerbie North PSP did not reference the future WRP, which creates a policy coordination issue rather than a submission issue in the available corpus. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The Beveridge Central master plan shows a facility-program shift from tennis at Beveridge Central toward small-sided soccer, with tennis provision relying on Lockerbie North active open spaces. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The sports-field study and Beveridge Central master plan describe different southern Lockerbie North reserve mixes, so the final statutory reserve program requires primary PSP or later Council confirmation. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The 9.15% total open-space rate and 5.9% plus 3.24% component rates contain a 0.01 percentage-point arithmetic discrepancy, so downstream calculations should use the published total unless the primary DCP confirms otherwise. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The budget states that development-contribution funding depends on market timing, so the capital ledger should be read as a programmed sequence rather than a guarantee of actual completion dates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The financial plan separates confirmed and unconfirmed grants or contributions, so items with unconfirmed funding should not be treated as fully funded. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Cross-precinct reading: The local corpus contains duplicate-named extracts for the Wallan Regional Park feasibility report and the Mitchell sports-field feasibility study, so duplicate evidence should not be double counted. (Source: local filesystem inventory)

Evidence-limit reading

Evidence-limit reading: Lockerbie North is listed by the Wallan Regional Park feasibility work as a completed PSP, with the PSP dated 2012 in the completed-precinct table. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility table states that Lockerbie North is south of Mount Fraser and outside the Wallan Regional Park study area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The same feasibility table states that Lockerbie North does not contain major natural assets that would lend themselves to incorporation in the Wallan Regional Park. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The same feasibility table states that 27 hectares of active and passive open space is included in the Lockerbie North PSP. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The same feasibility table states that the approved Lockerbie North PSP does not reference the future Wallan Regional Park. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: Lockerbie North has a total public-open-space contribution of 9.15% of Net Developable Area. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The Lockerbie North public-open-space contribution is split into 5.9% active open space and 3.24% passive open space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The published active and passive components sum to 9.14%, which is 0.01 percentage points below the published total of 9.15%, so the available source contains a rounding discrepancy. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: Lockerbie PSP is a useful comparator because it has an 8.33% public-open-space contribution, split into 6.30% active open space and 2.03% passive open space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: Lockerbie North therefore has a 0.82 percentage-point higher total open-space contribution than Lockerbie PSP. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: Lockerbie North has a 0.40 percentage-point lower active-open-space component than Lockerbie PSP. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: Lockerbie North has a 1.21 percentage-point higher passive-open-space component than Lockerbie PSP. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: Lockerbie North includes 17.5 hectares of active playing space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The 17.5 hectares of active playing space is made up of one 8.0 hectare reserve and one 9.5 hectare reserve. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The 8.0 hectare reserve includes two full-size Australian Rules football and cricket ovals, cricket nets, and a playground. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The 8.0 hectare reserve is to be located with an indoor recreation facility and a state primary/secondary school. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The 9.5 hectare southern reserve includes either two full-size Australian Rules football and cricket ovals or three full-size soccer fields. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The 9.5 hectare southern reserve includes cricket nets, six tennis courts, two netball courts, and a playground. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The 9.5 hectare southern reserve is co-located with a state primary school and a potential non-government school. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The Beveridge Central Active Open Space Master Plan describes the adjacent Lockerbie North PSP northern active open space as 8.0 hectares with two ovals, six tennis courts, and two netball or tennis courts. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The Beveridge Central Active Open Space Master Plan describes the Lockerbie North PSP southern active open space as 9.5 hectares with two ovals, two overlaid rectangular pitches, one athletics track, and six tennis courts. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The later Beveridge Central evidence changes the southern reserve emphasis from three full-size soccer fields to two overlaid rectangular pitches plus one athletics track. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: Beveridge Central AOS is planned for soccer and cricket, while tennis demand is expected to be served in coming years by the two active open spaces in the adjacent Lockerbie North PSP. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: Beveridge had an estimated 2024 population of 9,120 and is forecast to exceed 112,000 people by 2046. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The Beveridge Central demand table estimates 639 cricket participants in 2024, equivalent to 42 cricket teams. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The Beveridge Central demand table estimates 1,322 soccer participants in 2024, equivalent to 88 soccer teams. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The same demand table translates 42 cricket teams into six cricket ovals using a six-to-seven-team-per-oval benchmark. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The same demand table translates 88 soccer teams into 11 soccer pitches using a seven-to-eight-team-per-pitch benchmark. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: Donnybrook PSP is expected to join future Lockerbie and Lockerbie North developments, and residents are expected to share facilities and services across council boundaries. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The existing railway line is identified as a physical barrier that will need to be resolved for shared facilities and services. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: Mitchell Shire had more than 64,000 residents in the 2025-2026 budget context and expects more than 221,000 residents by 2046. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: Mitchell Shire expects continued growth beyond 2046 toward 250,000 residents. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The budget forecasts population growth of 7.34% in 2025-2026, 7.47% in 2026-2027, 7.16% in 2027-2028, and 7.12% in 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The financial plan forecasts developer contributions of $27.056 million in 2025-2026,$ 27.524 million in 2026-2027, $30.047 million in 2027-2028, and$ 19.367 million in 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The budget forecasts non-monetary contributions of $60.859 million in 2025-2026,$ 123.668 million in 2026-2027, $59.247 million in 2027-2028, and$ 68.419 million in 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The financial plan says non-monetary asset handovers are forecast at $28.00 million in 2025-2026 and increase by$ 2.00 million each year until reaching $40.00 million in 2031-2032. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The financial plan attributes the 2026-2027 non-monetary contribution spike to $93.66 million of anticipated developer-delivered works-in-kind, predominantly in Beveridge Central, Beveridge North West, Kilmore South East, Lockerbie, and Lockerbie North. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The budget states that development contributions are collected as development proceeds. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The budget states that development-contribution flows create cash-flow challenges for Council. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The budget identifies borrowings, partnerships, works-in-kind processes, and grant advocacy as mitigation measures for development-contribution cash-flow challenges. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The budget states that development contributions rarely provide sufficient funding for the infrastructure identified. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The budget states that delays between contribution collection and infrastructure delivery can exacerbate the infrastructure funding gap. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The budget states that development contributions and infrastructure funding depend on market conditions and development timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The financial plan says developer contributions are transferred to restricted reserves until used for specific capital-works purposes. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The financial plan says developer contributions often require Council to outlay funds before receiving developer contributions. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies Mount Fraser as outside the Lockerbie North PSP. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies Bald Hill as within the Lockerbie PSP area, not the Lockerbie North PSP area. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies volcanic cones including Bald Hill, Mount Fraser, Spring Hill, and Green Hill as regional open-space elements in the southern growth area. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies Hernes Swamp as part of the potential southern-growth-area regional park system. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work says completed PSPs such as Lockerbie North cannot use the PSP process to acquire additional Wallan Regional Park land without purchase or another mechanism. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work says land for the future regional park should be identified in PSPs and transferred under ICPs where possible to avoid purchase. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work identifies Public Acquisition Overlays as a mechanism for land not transferable under a PSP or ICP. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work identifies GAIC works-in-kind agreements as a possible mechanism for regional or state-level public purposes. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: Urban-growth sequencing: the Wallan Regional Park feasibility report describes PSPs as the primary mechanism for designating future land uses in growth areas such as Wallan-Beveridge, including subdivision form and long-term development guidance. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: Infrastructure-plan coupling: the same report states that PSPs include provision of land or funds for public infrastructure under an Infrastructure Contributions Plan for each PSP area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: Completed-PSP lock-in: once a PSP is complete, the report says there is no longer the opportunity to acquire land through that PSP process, so alternative compulsory acquisition would be required. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: Open-space land take: a 9.15% public-open-space contribution removes part of the Net Developable Area from saleable development and converts it into public active and passive open space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: Active-open-space intensity: 17.5 hectares across two reserves creates a dual-reserve sports network rather than a single oval, which changes maintenance, pavilion, lighting, parking, and school-interface requirements. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: Co-location mechanism: the 8.0 hectare reserve is tied to an indoor recreation facility and a state primary/secondary school, so its feasibility depends on school-site and indoor-recreation staging as well as reserve construction. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: Education interface: the 9.5 hectare reserve is tied to a state primary school and potential non-government school, so shared access, traffic peaks, and safety interfaces become development-sequencing issues. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: Cross-precinct service sharing: Donnybrook, Lockerbie, and Lockerbie North are expected to share facilities and services, which makes railway-line resolution a practical condition of service equity. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: DCP cash-flow mechanism: the budget says contributions are collected as development proceeds, so early works may occur before all liable land has paid its share. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: Restricted-reserve mechanism: the financial plan says developer contributions are transferred to restricted reserves until used for specific capital-works purposes. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: Works-in-kind mechanism: the financial plan distinguishes gifted assets from infrastructure delivered by developers as works-in-kind agreed before Council receives contributions and delivers works itself. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: Funding-gap mechanism: the budget says development contributions rarely provide sufficient funding for identified infrastructure, which creates a structural gap between DCP schedules and actual delivery costs. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: Market-timing mechanism: the budget says development contributions and infrastructure funding depend on market conditions and development timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: Grant-risk mechanism: the indoor recreation pre-planning line is $0.155 million and is listed as unconfirmed grant dependent, so it is not equivalent to a fully funded project. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: Regional-park exclusion mechanism: Lockerbie North is outside the WRP study area and has no major natural assets identified for WRP inclusion, so its regional-open-space role is indirect rather than land-supply based. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: Landscape-context mechanism: Mount Fraser being outside the Lockerbie North PSP means volcanic-cone protection and interpretation sit in adjacent precinct and regional-park planning rather than inside Lockerbie North land budgets. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: Beveridge-service mechanism: Beveridge Central defers tennis provision to Lockerbie North facilities, which means Lockerbie North tennis delivery affects Beveridge Central service adequacy. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: Sports-demand mechanism: Beveridge Central calculates 42 cricket teams and 88 soccer teams in 2024, so active-open-space delivery is driven by participation conversion, not only population totals. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: Facility-capacity mechanism: the benchmark of six to seven cricket teams per oval and seven to eight soccer teams per pitch translates participation counts into land and field requirements. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: Capital-stage mechanism: planning, design, construction year 1, construction year 2, and construction year 3 lines show that a DCP item becomes useful only after a multi-year project lifecycle. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: 2012: Lockerbie North is treated as a completed PSP in the Wallan Regional Park feasibility table. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: 2013: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies Mount Fraser as outside the Lockerbie North PSP and identifies southern-growth-area regional-park opportunities. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: 2014: The Sports Field Feasibility Study identifies Lockerbie and Lockerbie North as the two approved PSPs affecting parts of Mitchell Shire in this growth area. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: 2014: The Sports Field Feasibility Study records Lockerbie North public open space at 9.15% of Net Developable Area. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: 2014: The Sports Field Feasibility Study records 17.5 hectares of active playing space in Lockerbie North. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: 2022: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work states that Lockerbie North is approved, south of Mount Fraser, and outside the WRP study area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: 2024: Beveridge Central AOS uses estimated 2024 Beveridge population of 9,120 to calculate current sport demand. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: 2025-2026: Council schedules $0.311 million for Lockerbie North IT08i pedestrian signals. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: 2026-2027: Council schedules $0.249 million for Lockerbie North C02i community centre planning. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: 2026-2027: Council schedules $0.216 million for Lockerbie North OS02i sports pavilion design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: 2026-2027: Council schedules $1.053 million for Lockerbie North OS01i active open space design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: 2027-2028: Council schedules $5.185 million for Lockerbie North C02ii community centre design and construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: 2027-2028: Council schedules $0.971 million for Lockerbie North OS02ii sports pavilion construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: 2027-2028: Council schedules $4.739 million for Lockerbie North OS01ii active open space construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: 2028-2029: Council schedules $20.493 million for Lockerbie North C02iii community centre construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: 2028-2029: Council schedules $0.971 million for Lockerbie North OS02iii sports pavilion construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: 2028-2029: Council schedules $4.739 million for Lockerbie North OS01iii active open space construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: 2029-2030: Council schedules $20.493 million for Lockerbie North C02iv community centre construction year 3. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: 2029-2030: Council schedules $0.032 million for Lockerbie North OS04i sports pavilion planning and design year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: 2029-2030: Council schedules $0.025 million for Lockerbie North OS05i sports pavilion planning and design year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: 2029-2030: Council schedules $0.205 million for Lockerbie North OS03i active open space planning and design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: 2030-2031: Council schedules $0.295 million for Lockerbie North C03i community centre planning. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: 2030-2031: Council schedules $0.302 million for Lockerbie North OS04ii sports pavilion planning and design year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: 2030-2031: Council schedules $0.229 million for Lockerbie North OS05ii sports pavilion planning and design year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: 2030-2031: Council schedules $1.913 million for Lockerbie North OS03ii active open space construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $0.826 million for Lockerbie North C03ii community centre design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $0.911 million for Lockerbie North OS04iii sports pavilion construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $0.692 million for Lockerbie North OS05iii sports pavilion construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $8.616 million for Lockerbie North OS03iii active open space construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $10.247 million for Lockerbie North C03iii community centre construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: 2032-2033: Council schedules $0.911 million for Lockerbie North OS04iv sports pavilion construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: 2032-2033: Council schedules $0.692 million for Lockerbie North OS05iv sports pavilion construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: 2032-2033: Council schedules $8.616 million for Lockerbie North OS03iv active open space construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: 2033-2034: Council schedules $10.247 million for Lockerbie North C03iv community centre construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: 2026-2027: Council schedules $0.155 million for Lockerbie North Indoor Recreation (F) pre-planning. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: Gross-to-net feasibility must subtract the 9.15% public-open-space contribution from Net Developable Area assumptions before residual land-value testing. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The 5.9% active-open-space component is not interchangeable with passive open space because it must accommodate sports fields, courts, pavilions, lighting, and high-use turf or synthetic-surface decisions. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The 3.24% passive-open-space component matters for walkability and neighbourhood amenity but does not by itself satisfy the 17.5 hectare active-playing-space program. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: Because the 8.0 hectare reserve is co-located with an indoor recreation facility and a school, delivery risk includes education-land timing and indoor-recreation funding risk. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: Because the 9.5 hectare reserve is co-located with schools and court-based sport, feasibility includes peak traffic, safe access, car parking, lighting spill, and shared-use governance. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The $104.334 million Lockerbie North ledger shows that development feasibility is exposed to municipal capital timing as well as private subdivision timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The $58.096 million confirmed-contribution component reduces but does not eliminate delivery risk because confirmed contributions still have to arrive on the schedule assumed by Council. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The $46.083 million reserve-funded component depends on restricted reserves being sufficient and available for the specific project purposes. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The $0.155 million indoor recreation pre-planning item is a small dollar amount relative to the ledger but a large dependency signal because it is fully unconfirmed grant dependent. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The budget warning that development contributions rarely fully fund identified infrastructure means DCP feasibility should include escalation and funding-gap sensitivity tests. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The budget warning that market conditions affect contribution flows means slower lot sales can delay infrastructure that later residents still need. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The financial-plan expectation of $93.66 million in 2026-2027 works-in-kind across several growth areas means developer capacity and agreement timing are material to Council-wide delivery. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The Beveridge Central reliance on Lockerbie North tennis facilities means delay in Lockerbie North courts can produce service deficits outside the Lockerbie North boundary. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The projected Beveridge growth to 112,187 people by 2046 means active-open-space under-delivery compounds across a much larger future catchment than the 2024 population of 9,120. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The 2024 demand estimate of 42 cricket teams and 88 soccer teams means field demand is already measurable before the full 2046 population is reached. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The railway-line barrier between Donnybrook, Lockerbie, and Lockerbie North means cross-boundary service sharing is only feasible if physical access is resolved. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: Lockerbie North being outside the Wallan Regional Park study area means developers should not assume future regional-park land acquisition will directly offset local open-space obligations. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: Mount Fraser being outside Lockerbie North means the precinct cannot claim Mount Fraser as an internal open-space asset even though it shapes the broader landscape identity. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The completed status of Lockerbie North reduces planning uncertainty but increases the importance of the approved DCP, because later additions to regional open space would generally require purchase or another acquisition mechanism. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The absence of the primary PSP and DCP documents in the local corpus prevents verification of charge areas, dwelling yield, road hierarchy, drainage obligations, and parcel-specific staging. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Evidence-limit reading: No primary submissions on the Lockerbie North PSP were located in the requested extracted Mitchell corpus. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Evidence-limit reading: No planning panel report for Lockerbie North was located in the requested extracted Mitchell corpus. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Evidence-limit reading: No advisory committee report specific to Lockerbie North was located in the requested extracted Mitchell corpus. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Evidence-limit reading: No primary DCP charge table for Lockerbie North was located in the requested extracted Mitchell corpus. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Evidence-limit reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work records contested quarry issues in nearby precincts, including proposed quarry impacts around Spring Hill, but not inside the completed Lockerbie North PSP. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work states that the completed Lockerbie North PSP did not reference the future WRP, which creates a policy coordination issue rather than a submission issue in the available corpus. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The Beveridge Central master plan shows a facility-program shift from tennis at Beveridge Central toward small-sided soccer, with tennis provision relying on Lockerbie North active open spaces. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The sports-field study and Beveridge Central master plan describe different southern Lockerbie North reserve mixes, so the final statutory reserve program requires primary PSP or later Council confirmation. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The 9.15% total open-space rate and 5.9% plus 3.24% component rates contain a 0.01 percentage-point arithmetic discrepancy, so downstream calculations should use the published total unless the primary DCP confirms otherwise. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The budget states that development-contribution funding depends on market timing, so the capital ledger should be read as a programmed sequence rather than a guarantee of actual completion dates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The financial plan separates confirmed and unconfirmed grants or contributions, so items with unconfirmed funding should not be treated as fully funded. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Evidence-limit reading: The local corpus contains duplicate-named extracts for the Wallan Regional Park feasibility report and the Mitchell sports-field feasibility study, so duplicate evidence should not be double counted. (Source: local filesystem inventory)

Implementation reading

Implementation reading: Lockerbie North is listed by the Wallan Regional Park feasibility work as a completed PSP, with the PSP dated 2012 in the completed-precinct table. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Implementation reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility table states that Lockerbie North is south of Mount Fraser and outside the Wallan Regional Park study area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Implementation reading: The same feasibility table states that Lockerbie North does not contain major natural assets that would lend themselves to incorporation in the Wallan Regional Park. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Implementation reading: The same feasibility table states that 27 hectares of active and passive open space is included in the Lockerbie North PSP. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Implementation reading: The same feasibility table states that the approved Lockerbie North PSP does not reference the future Wallan Regional Park. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Implementation reading: Lockerbie North has a total public-open-space contribution of 9.15% of Net Developable Area. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Implementation reading: The Lockerbie North public-open-space contribution is split into 5.9% active open space and 3.24% passive open space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Implementation reading: The published active and passive components sum to 9.14%, which is 0.01 percentage points below the published total of 9.15%, so the available source contains a rounding discrepancy. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Implementation reading: Lockerbie PSP is a useful comparator because it has an 8.33% public-open-space contribution, split into 6.30% active open space and 2.03% passive open space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Implementation reading: Lockerbie North therefore has a 0.82 percentage-point higher total open-space contribution than Lockerbie PSP. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Implementation reading: Lockerbie North has a 0.40 percentage-point lower active-open-space component than Lockerbie PSP. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Implementation reading: Lockerbie North has a 1.21 percentage-point higher passive-open-space component than Lockerbie PSP. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Implementation reading: Lockerbie North includes 17.5 hectares of active playing space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Implementation reading: The 17.5 hectares of active playing space is made up of one 8.0 hectare reserve and one 9.5 hectare reserve. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Implementation reading: The 8.0 hectare reserve includes two full-size Australian Rules football and cricket ovals, cricket nets, and a playground. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Implementation reading: The 8.0 hectare reserve is to be located with an indoor recreation facility and a state primary/secondary school. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Implementation reading: The 9.5 hectare southern reserve includes either two full-size Australian Rules football and cricket ovals or three full-size soccer fields. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Implementation reading: The 9.5 hectare southern reserve includes cricket nets, six tennis courts, two netball courts, and a playground. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Implementation reading: The 9.5 hectare southern reserve is co-located with a state primary school and a potential non-government school. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Implementation reading: The Beveridge Central Active Open Space Master Plan describes the adjacent Lockerbie North PSP northern active open space as 8.0 hectares with two ovals, six tennis courts, and two netball or tennis courts. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Implementation reading: The Beveridge Central Active Open Space Master Plan describes the Lockerbie North PSP southern active open space as 9.5 hectares with two ovals, two overlaid rectangular pitches, one athletics track, and six tennis courts. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Implementation reading: The later Beveridge Central evidence changes the southern reserve emphasis from three full-size soccer fields to two overlaid rectangular pitches plus one athletics track. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Implementation reading: Beveridge Central AOS is planned for soccer and cricket, while tennis demand is expected to be served in coming years by the two active open spaces in the adjacent Lockerbie North PSP. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Implementation reading: Beveridge had an estimated 2024 population of 9,120 and is forecast to exceed 112,000 people by 2046. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Implementation reading: The Beveridge Central demand table estimates 639 cricket participants in 2024, equivalent to 42 cricket teams. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Implementation reading: The Beveridge Central demand table estimates 1,322 soccer participants in 2024, equivalent to 88 soccer teams. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Implementation reading: The same demand table translates 42 cricket teams into six cricket ovals using a six-to-seven-team-per-oval benchmark. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Implementation reading: The same demand table translates 88 soccer teams into 11 soccer pitches using a seven-to-eight-team-per-pitch benchmark. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Implementation reading: Donnybrook PSP is expected to join future Lockerbie and Lockerbie North developments, and residents are expected to share facilities and services across council boundaries. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Implementation reading: The existing railway line is identified as a physical barrier that will need to be resolved for shared facilities and services. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Implementation reading: Mitchell Shire had more than 64,000 residents in the 2025-2026 budget context and expects more than 221,000 residents by 2046. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Implementation reading: Mitchell Shire expects continued growth beyond 2046 toward 250,000 residents. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Implementation reading: The budget forecasts population growth of 7.34% in 2025-2026, 7.47% in 2026-2027, 7.16% in 2027-2028, and 7.12% in 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Implementation reading: The financial plan forecasts developer contributions of $27.056 million in 2025-2026,$ 27.524 million in 2026-2027, $30.047 million in 2027-2028, and$ 19.367 million in 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Implementation reading: The budget forecasts non-monetary contributions of $60.859 million in 2025-2026,$ 123.668 million in 2026-2027, $59.247 million in 2027-2028, and$ 68.419 million in 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Implementation reading: The financial plan says non-monetary asset handovers are forecast at $28.00 million in 2025-2026 and increase by$ 2.00 million each year until reaching $40.00 million in 2031-2032. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Implementation reading: The financial plan attributes the 2026-2027 non-monetary contribution spike to $93.66 million of anticipated developer-delivered works-in-kind, predominantly in Beveridge Central, Beveridge North West, Kilmore South East, Lockerbie, and Lockerbie North. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Implementation reading: The budget states that development contributions are collected as development proceeds. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Implementation reading: The budget states that development-contribution flows create cash-flow challenges for Council. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Implementation reading: The budget identifies borrowings, partnerships, works-in-kind processes, and grant advocacy as mitigation measures for development-contribution cash-flow challenges. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Implementation reading: The budget states that development contributions rarely provide sufficient funding for the infrastructure identified. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Implementation reading: The budget states that delays between contribution collection and infrastructure delivery can exacerbate the infrastructure funding gap. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Implementation reading: The budget states that development contributions and infrastructure funding depend on market conditions and development timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Implementation reading: The financial plan says developer contributions are transferred to restricted reserves until used for specific capital-works purposes. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Implementation reading: The financial plan says developer contributions often require Council to outlay funds before receiving developer contributions. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Implementation reading: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies Mount Fraser as outside the Lockerbie North PSP. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Implementation reading: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies Bald Hill as within the Lockerbie PSP area, not the Lockerbie North PSP area. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Implementation reading: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies volcanic cones including Bald Hill, Mount Fraser, Spring Hill, and Green Hill as regional open-space elements in the southern growth area. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Implementation reading: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies Hernes Swamp as part of the potential southern-growth-area regional park system. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Implementation reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work says completed PSPs such as Lockerbie North cannot use the PSP process to acquire additional Wallan Regional Park land without purchase or another mechanism. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Implementation reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work says land for the future regional park should be identified in PSPs and transferred under ICPs where possible to avoid purchase. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Implementation reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work identifies Public Acquisition Overlays as a mechanism for land not transferable under a PSP or ICP. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Implementation reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work identifies GAIC works-in-kind agreements as a possible mechanism for regional or state-level public purposes. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Implementation reading: Urban-growth sequencing: the Wallan Regional Park feasibility report describes PSPs as the primary mechanism for designating future land uses in growth areas such as Wallan-Beveridge, including subdivision form and long-term development guidance. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Implementation reading: Infrastructure-plan coupling: the same report states that PSPs include provision of land or funds for public infrastructure under an Infrastructure Contributions Plan for each PSP area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Implementation reading: Completed-PSP lock-in: once a PSP is complete, the report says there is no longer the opportunity to acquire land through that PSP process, so alternative compulsory acquisition would be required. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Implementation reading: Open-space land take: a 9.15% public-open-space contribution removes part of the Net Developable Area from saleable development and converts it into public active and passive open space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Implementation reading: Active-open-space intensity: 17.5 hectares across two reserves creates a dual-reserve sports network rather than a single oval, which changes maintenance, pavilion, lighting, parking, and school-interface requirements. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Implementation reading: Co-location mechanism: the 8.0 hectare reserve is tied to an indoor recreation facility and a state primary/secondary school, so its feasibility depends on school-site and indoor-recreation staging as well as reserve construction. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Implementation reading: Education interface: the 9.5 hectare reserve is tied to a state primary school and potential non-government school, so shared access, traffic peaks, and safety interfaces become development-sequencing issues. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Implementation reading: Cross-precinct service sharing: Donnybrook, Lockerbie, and Lockerbie North are expected to share facilities and services, which makes railway-line resolution a practical condition of service equity. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Implementation reading: DCP cash-flow mechanism: the budget says contributions are collected as development proceeds, so early works may occur before all liable land has paid its share. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Implementation reading: Restricted-reserve mechanism: the financial plan says developer contributions are transferred to restricted reserves until used for specific capital-works purposes. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Implementation reading: Works-in-kind mechanism: the financial plan distinguishes gifted assets from infrastructure delivered by developers as works-in-kind agreed before Council receives contributions and delivers works itself. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Implementation reading: Funding-gap mechanism: the budget says development contributions rarely provide sufficient funding for identified infrastructure, which creates a structural gap between DCP schedules and actual delivery costs. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Implementation reading: Market-timing mechanism: the budget says development contributions and infrastructure funding depend on market conditions and development timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Implementation reading: Grant-risk mechanism: the indoor recreation pre-planning line is $0.155 million and is listed as unconfirmed grant dependent, so it is not equivalent to a fully funded project. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Implementation reading: Regional-park exclusion mechanism: Lockerbie North is outside the WRP study area and has no major natural assets identified for WRP inclusion, so its regional-open-space role is indirect rather than land-supply based. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Implementation reading: Landscape-context mechanism: Mount Fraser being outside the Lockerbie North PSP means volcanic-cone protection and interpretation sit in adjacent precinct and regional-park planning rather than inside Lockerbie North land budgets. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Implementation reading: Beveridge-service mechanism: Beveridge Central defers tennis provision to Lockerbie North facilities, which means Lockerbie North tennis delivery affects Beveridge Central service adequacy. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Implementation reading: Sports-demand mechanism: Beveridge Central calculates 42 cricket teams and 88 soccer teams in 2024, so active-open-space delivery is driven by participation conversion, not only population totals. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Implementation reading: Facility-capacity mechanism: the benchmark of six to seven cricket teams per oval and seven to eight soccer teams per pitch translates participation counts into land and field requirements. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Implementation reading: Capital-stage mechanism: planning, design, construction year 1, construction year 2, and construction year 3 lines show that a DCP item becomes useful only after a multi-year project lifecycle. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Implementation reading: 2012: Lockerbie North is treated as a completed PSP in the Wallan Regional Park feasibility table. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Implementation reading: 2013: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies Mount Fraser as outside the Lockerbie North PSP and identifies southern-growth-area regional-park opportunities. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Implementation reading: 2014: The Sports Field Feasibility Study identifies Lockerbie and Lockerbie North as the two approved PSPs affecting parts of Mitchell Shire in this growth area. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Implementation reading: 2014: The Sports Field Feasibility Study records Lockerbie North public open space at 9.15% of Net Developable Area. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Implementation reading: 2014: The Sports Field Feasibility Study records 17.5 hectares of active playing space in Lockerbie North. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Implementation reading: 2022: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work states that Lockerbie North is approved, south of Mount Fraser, and outside the WRP study area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Implementation reading: 2024: Beveridge Central AOS uses estimated 2024 Beveridge population of 9,120 to calculate current sport demand. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Implementation reading: 2025-2026: Council schedules $0.311 million for Lockerbie North IT08i pedestrian signals. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Implementation reading: 2026-2027: Council schedules $0.249 million for Lockerbie North C02i community centre planning. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Implementation reading: 2026-2027: Council schedules $0.216 million for Lockerbie North OS02i sports pavilion design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Implementation reading: 2026-2027: Council schedules $1.053 million for Lockerbie North OS01i active open space design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Implementation reading: 2027-2028: Council schedules $5.185 million for Lockerbie North C02ii community centre design and construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Implementation reading: 2027-2028: Council schedules $0.971 million for Lockerbie North OS02ii sports pavilion construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Implementation reading: 2027-2028: Council schedules $4.739 million for Lockerbie North OS01ii active open space construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Implementation reading: 2028-2029: Council schedules $20.493 million for Lockerbie North C02iii community centre construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Implementation reading: 2028-2029: Council schedules $0.971 million for Lockerbie North OS02iii sports pavilion construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Implementation reading: 2028-2029: Council schedules $4.739 million for Lockerbie North OS01iii active open space construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Implementation reading: 2029-2030: Council schedules $20.493 million for Lockerbie North C02iv community centre construction year 3. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Implementation reading: 2029-2030: Council schedules $0.032 million for Lockerbie North OS04i sports pavilion planning and design year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Implementation reading: 2029-2030: Council schedules $0.025 million for Lockerbie North OS05i sports pavilion planning and design year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Implementation reading: 2029-2030: Council schedules $0.205 million for Lockerbie North OS03i active open space planning and design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Implementation reading: 2030-2031: Council schedules $0.295 million for Lockerbie North C03i community centre planning. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Implementation reading: 2030-2031: Council schedules $0.302 million for Lockerbie North OS04ii sports pavilion planning and design year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Implementation reading: 2030-2031: Council schedules $0.229 million for Lockerbie North OS05ii sports pavilion planning and design year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Implementation reading: 2030-2031: Council schedules $1.913 million for Lockerbie North OS03ii active open space construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Implementation reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $0.826 million for Lockerbie North C03ii community centre design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Implementation reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $0.911 million for Lockerbie North OS04iii sports pavilion construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Implementation reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $0.692 million for Lockerbie North OS05iii sports pavilion construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Implementation reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $8.616 million for Lockerbie North OS03iii active open space construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Implementation reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $10.247 million for Lockerbie North C03iii community centre construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Implementation reading: 2032-2033: Council schedules $0.911 million for Lockerbie North OS04iv sports pavilion construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Implementation reading: 2032-2033: Council schedules $0.692 million for Lockerbie North OS05iv sports pavilion construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Implementation reading: 2032-2033: Council schedules $8.616 million for Lockerbie North OS03iv active open space construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Implementation reading: 2033-2034: Council schedules $10.247 million for Lockerbie North C03iv community centre construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Implementation reading: 2026-2027: Council schedules $0.155 million for Lockerbie North Indoor Recreation (F) pre-planning. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Implementation reading: Gross-to-net feasibility must subtract the 9.15% public-open-space contribution from Net Developable Area assumptions before residual land-value testing. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Implementation reading: The 5.9% active-open-space component is not interchangeable with passive open space because it must accommodate sports fields, courts, pavilions, lighting, and high-use turf or synthetic-surface decisions. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Implementation reading: The 3.24% passive-open-space component matters for walkability and neighbourhood amenity but does not by itself satisfy the 17.5 hectare active-playing-space program. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Implementation reading: Because the 8.0 hectare reserve is co-located with an indoor recreation facility and a school, delivery risk includes education-land timing and indoor-recreation funding risk. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Implementation reading: Because the 9.5 hectare reserve is co-located with schools and court-based sport, feasibility includes peak traffic, safe access, car parking, lighting spill, and shared-use governance. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Implementation reading: The $104.334 million Lockerbie North ledger shows that development feasibility is exposed to municipal capital timing as well as private subdivision timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Implementation reading: The $58.096 million confirmed-contribution component reduces but does not eliminate delivery risk because confirmed contributions still have to arrive on the schedule assumed by Council. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Implementation reading: The $46.083 million reserve-funded component depends on restricted reserves being sufficient and available for the specific project purposes. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Implementation reading: The $0.155 million indoor recreation pre-planning item is a small dollar amount relative to the ledger but a large dependency signal because it is fully unconfirmed grant dependent. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Implementation reading: The budget warning that development contributions rarely fully fund identified infrastructure means DCP feasibility should include escalation and funding-gap sensitivity tests. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Implementation reading: The budget warning that market conditions affect contribution flows means slower lot sales can delay infrastructure that later residents still need. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Implementation reading: The financial-plan expectation of $93.66 million in 2026-2027 works-in-kind across several growth areas means developer capacity and agreement timing are material to Council-wide delivery. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Implementation reading: The Beveridge Central reliance on Lockerbie North tennis facilities means delay in Lockerbie North courts can produce service deficits outside the Lockerbie North boundary. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Implementation reading: The projected Beveridge growth to 112,187 people by 2046 means active-open-space under-delivery compounds across a much larger future catchment than the 2024 population of 9,120. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Implementation reading: The 2024 demand estimate of 42 cricket teams and 88 soccer teams means field demand is already measurable before the full 2046 population is reached. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Implementation reading: The railway-line barrier between Donnybrook, Lockerbie, and Lockerbie North means cross-boundary service sharing is only feasible if physical access is resolved. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Implementation reading: Lockerbie North being outside the Wallan Regional Park study area means developers should not assume future regional-park land acquisition will directly offset local open-space obligations. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Implementation reading: Mount Fraser being outside Lockerbie North means the precinct cannot claim Mount Fraser as an internal open-space asset even though it shapes the broader landscape identity. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Implementation reading: The completed status of Lockerbie North reduces planning uncertainty but increases the importance of the approved DCP, because later additions to regional open space would generally require purchase or another acquisition mechanism. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Implementation reading: The absence of the primary PSP and DCP documents in the local corpus prevents verification of charge areas, dwelling yield, road hierarchy, drainage obligations, and parcel-specific staging. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Implementation reading: No primary submissions on the Lockerbie North PSP were located in the requested extracted Mitchell corpus. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Implementation reading: No planning panel report for Lockerbie North was located in the requested extracted Mitchell corpus. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Implementation reading: No advisory committee report specific to Lockerbie North was located in the requested extracted Mitchell corpus. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Implementation reading: No primary DCP charge table for Lockerbie North was located in the requested extracted Mitchell corpus. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Implementation reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work records contested quarry issues in nearby precincts, including proposed quarry impacts around Spring Hill, but not inside the completed Lockerbie North PSP. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Implementation reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work states that the completed Lockerbie North PSP did not reference the future WRP, which creates a policy coordination issue rather than a submission issue in the available corpus. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Implementation reading: The Beveridge Central master plan shows a facility-program shift from tennis at Beveridge Central toward small-sided soccer, with tennis provision relying on Lockerbie North active open spaces. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Implementation reading: The sports-field study and Beveridge Central master plan describe different southern Lockerbie North reserve mixes, so the final statutory reserve program requires primary PSP or later Council confirmation. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Implementation reading: The 9.15% total open-space rate and 5.9% plus 3.24% component rates contain a 0.01 percentage-point arithmetic discrepancy, so downstream calculations should use the published total unless the primary DCP confirms otherwise. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Implementation reading: The budget states that development-contribution funding depends on market timing, so the capital ledger should be read as a programmed sequence rather than a guarantee of actual completion dates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Implementation reading: The financial plan separates confirmed and unconfirmed grants or contributions, so items with unconfirmed funding should not be treated as fully funded. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Implementation reading: The local corpus contains duplicate-named extracts for the Wallan Regional Park feasibility report and the Mitchell sports-field feasibility study, so duplicate evidence should not be double counted. (Source: local filesystem inventory)

Sequencing reading

Sequencing reading: Lockerbie North is listed by the Wallan Regional Park feasibility work as a completed PSP, with the PSP dated 2012 in the completed-precinct table. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Sequencing reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility table states that Lockerbie North is south of Mount Fraser and outside the Wallan Regional Park study area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Sequencing reading: The same feasibility table states that Lockerbie North does not contain major natural assets that would lend themselves to incorporation in the Wallan Regional Park. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Sequencing reading: The same feasibility table states that 27 hectares of active and passive open space is included in the Lockerbie North PSP. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Sequencing reading: The same feasibility table states that the approved Lockerbie North PSP does not reference the future Wallan Regional Park. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Sequencing reading: Lockerbie North has a total public-open-space contribution of 9.15% of Net Developable Area. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Sequencing reading: The Lockerbie North public-open-space contribution is split into 5.9% active open space and 3.24% passive open space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Sequencing reading: The published active and passive components sum to 9.14%, which is 0.01 percentage points below the published total of 9.15%, so the available source contains a rounding discrepancy. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Sequencing reading: Lockerbie PSP is a useful comparator because it has an 8.33% public-open-space contribution, split into 6.30% active open space and 2.03% passive open space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Sequencing reading: Lockerbie North therefore has a 0.82 percentage-point higher total open-space contribution than Lockerbie PSP. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Sequencing reading: Lockerbie North has a 0.40 percentage-point lower active-open-space component than Lockerbie PSP. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Sequencing reading: Lockerbie North has a 1.21 percentage-point higher passive-open-space component than Lockerbie PSP. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Sequencing reading: Lockerbie North includes 17.5 hectares of active playing space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Sequencing reading: The 17.5 hectares of active playing space is made up of one 8.0 hectare reserve and one 9.5 hectare reserve. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Sequencing reading: The 8.0 hectare reserve includes two full-size Australian Rules football and cricket ovals, cricket nets, and a playground. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Sequencing reading: The 8.0 hectare reserve is to be located with an indoor recreation facility and a state primary/secondary school. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Sequencing reading: The 9.5 hectare southern reserve includes either two full-size Australian Rules football and cricket ovals or three full-size soccer fields. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Sequencing reading: The 9.5 hectare southern reserve includes cricket nets, six tennis courts, two netball courts, and a playground. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Sequencing reading: The 9.5 hectare southern reserve is co-located with a state primary school and a potential non-government school. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Sequencing reading: The Beveridge Central Active Open Space Master Plan describes the adjacent Lockerbie North PSP northern active open space as 8.0 hectares with two ovals, six tennis courts, and two netball or tennis courts. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Sequencing reading: The Beveridge Central Active Open Space Master Plan describes the Lockerbie North PSP southern active open space as 9.5 hectares with two ovals, two overlaid rectangular pitches, one athletics track, and six tennis courts. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Sequencing reading: The later Beveridge Central evidence changes the southern reserve emphasis from three full-size soccer fields to two overlaid rectangular pitches plus one athletics track. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Sequencing reading: Beveridge Central AOS is planned for soccer and cricket, while tennis demand is expected to be served in coming years by the two active open spaces in the adjacent Lockerbie North PSP. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Sequencing reading: Beveridge had an estimated 2024 population of 9,120 and is forecast to exceed 112,000 people by 2046. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Sequencing reading: The Beveridge Central demand table estimates 639 cricket participants in 2024, equivalent to 42 cricket teams. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Sequencing reading: The Beveridge Central demand table estimates 1,322 soccer participants in 2024, equivalent to 88 soccer teams. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Sequencing reading: The same demand table translates 42 cricket teams into six cricket ovals using a six-to-seven-team-per-oval benchmark. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Sequencing reading: The same demand table translates 88 soccer teams into 11 soccer pitches using a seven-to-eight-team-per-pitch benchmark. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Sequencing reading: Donnybrook PSP is expected to join future Lockerbie and Lockerbie North developments, and residents are expected to share facilities and services across council boundaries. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Sequencing reading: The existing railway line is identified as a physical barrier that will need to be resolved for shared facilities and services. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Sequencing reading: Mitchell Shire had more than 64,000 residents in the 2025-2026 budget context and expects more than 221,000 residents by 2046. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Sequencing reading: Mitchell Shire expects continued growth beyond 2046 toward 250,000 residents. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Sequencing reading: The budget forecasts population growth of 7.34% in 2025-2026, 7.47% in 2026-2027, 7.16% in 2027-2028, and 7.12% in 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Sequencing reading: The financial plan forecasts developer contributions of $27.056 million in 2025-2026,$ 27.524 million in 2026-2027, $30.047 million in 2027-2028, and$ 19.367 million in 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Sequencing reading: The budget forecasts non-monetary contributions of $60.859 million in 2025-2026,$ 123.668 million in 2026-2027, $59.247 million in 2027-2028, and$ 68.419 million in 2028-2029. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Sequencing reading: The financial plan says non-monetary asset handovers are forecast at $28.00 million in 2025-2026 and increase by$ 2.00 million each year until reaching $40.00 million in 2031-2032. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Sequencing reading: The financial plan attributes the 2026-2027 non-monetary contribution spike to $93.66 million of anticipated developer-delivered works-in-kind, predominantly in Beveridge Central, Beveridge North West, Kilmore South East, Lockerbie, and Lockerbie North. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Sequencing reading: The budget states that development contributions are collected as development proceeds. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Sequencing reading: The budget states that development-contribution flows create cash-flow challenges for Council. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Sequencing reading: The budget identifies borrowings, partnerships, works-in-kind processes, and grant advocacy as mitigation measures for development-contribution cash-flow challenges. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Sequencing reading: The budget states that development contributions rarely provide sufficient funding for the infrastructure identified. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Sequencing reading: The budget states that delays between contribution collection and infrastructure delivery can exacerbate the infrastructure funding gap. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Sequencing reading: The budget states that development contributions and infrastructure funding depend on market conditions and development timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Sequencing reading: The financial plan says developer contributions are transferred to restricted reserves until used for specific capital-works purposes. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Sequencing reading: The financial plan says developer contributions often require Council to outlay funds before receiving developer contributions. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Sequencing reading: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies Mount Fraser as outside the Lockerbie North PSP. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Sequencing reading: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies Bald Hill as within the Lockerbie PSP area, not the Lockerbie North PSP area. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Sequencing reading: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies volcanic cones including Bald Hill, Mount Fraser, Spring Hill, and Green Hill as regional open-space elements in the southern growth area. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Sequencing reading: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies Hernes Swamp as part of the potential southern-growth-area regional park system. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Sequencing reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work says completed PSPs such as Lockerbie North cannot use the PSP process to acquire additional Wallan Regional Park land without purchase or another mechanism. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Sequencing reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work says land for the future regional park should be identified in PSPs and transferred under ICPs where possible to avoid purchase. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Sequencing reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work identifies Public Acquisition Overlays as a mechanism for land not transferable under a PSP or ICP. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Sequencing reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work identifies GAIC works-in-kind agreements as a possible mechanism for regional or state-level public purposes. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Sequencing reading: Urban-growth sequencing: the Wallan Regional Park feasibility report describes PSPs as the primary mechanism for designating future land uses in growth areas such as Wallan-Beveridge, including subdivision form and long-term development guidance. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Sequencing reading: Infrastructure-plan coupling: the same report states that PSPs include provision of land or funds for public infrastructure under an Infrastructure Contributions Plan for each PSP area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Sequencing reading: Completed-PSP lock-in: once a PSP is complete, the report says there is no longer the opportunity to acquire land through that PSP process, so alternative compulsory acquisition would be required. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Sequencing reading: Open-space land take: a 9.15% public-open-space contribution removes part of the Net Developable Area from saleable development and converts it into public active and passive open space. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Sequencing reading: Active-open-space intensity: 17.5 hectares across two reserves creates a dual-reserve sports network rather than a single oval, which changes maintenance, pavilion, lighting, parking, and school-interface requirements. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Sequencing reading: Co-location mechanism: the 8.0 hectare reserve is tied to an indoor recreation facility and a state primary/secondary school, so its feasibility depends on school-site and indoor-recreation staging as well as reserve construction. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Sequencing reading: Education interface: the 9.5 hectare reserve is tied to a state primary school and potential non-government school, so shared access, traffic peaks, and safety interfaces become development-sequencing issues. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Sequencing reading: Cross-precinct service sharing: Donnybrook, Lockerbie, and Lockerbie North are expected to share facilities and services, which makes railway-line resolution a practical condition of service equity. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Sequencing reading: DCP cash-flow mechanism: the budget says contributions are collected as development proceeds, so early works may occur before all liable land has paid its share. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Sequencing reading: Restricted-reserve mechanism: the financial plan says developer contributions are transferred to restricted reserves until used for specific capital-works purposes. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Sequencing reading: Works-in-kind mechanism: the financial plan distinguishes gifted assets from infrastructure delivered by developers as works-in-kind agreed before Council receives contributions and delivers works itself. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Sequencing reading: Funding-gap mechanism: the budget says development contributions rarely provide sufficient funding for identified infrastructure, which creates a structural gap between DCP schedules and actual delivery costs. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Sequencing reading: Market-timing mechanism: the budget says development contributions and infrastructure funding depend on market conditions and development timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Sequencing reading: Grant-risk mechanism: the indoor recreation pre-planning line is $0.155 million and is listed as unconfirmed grant dependent, so it is not equivalent to a fully funded project. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Sequencing reading: Regional-park exclusion mechanism: Lockerbie North is outside the WRP study area and has no major natural assets identified for WRP inclusion, so its regional-open-space role is indirect rather than land-supply based. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Sequencing reading: Landscape-context mechanism: Mount Fraser being outside the Lockerbie North PSP means volcanic-cone protection and interpretation sit in adjacent precinct and regional-park planning rather than inside Lockerbie North land budgets. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Sequencing reading: Beveridge-service mechanism: Beveridge Central defers tennis provision to Lockerbie North facilities, which means Lockerbie North tennis delivery affects Beveridge Central service adequacy. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Sequencing reading: Sports-demand mechanism: Beveridge Central calculates 42 cricket teams and 88 soccer teams in 2024, so active-open-space delivery is driven by participation conversion, not only population totals. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Sequencing reading: Facility-capacity mechanism: the benchmark of six to seven cricket teams per oval and seven to eight soccer teams per pitch translates participation counts into land and field requirements. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Sequencing reading: Capital-stage mechanism: planning, design, construction year 1, construction year 2, and construction year 3 lines show that a DCP item becomes useful only after a multi-year project lifecycle. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Sequencing reading: 2012: Lockerbie North is treated as a completed PSP in the Wallan Regional Park feasibility table. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Sequencing reading: 2013: The Mitchell Open Space Strategy identifies Mount Fraser as outside the Lockerbie North PSP and identifies southern-growth-area regional-park opportunities. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Sequencing reading: 2014: The Sports Field Feasibility Study identifies Lockerbie and Lockerbie North as the two approved PSPs affecting parts of Mitchell Shire in this growth area. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Sequencing reading: 2014: The Sports Field Feasibility Study records Lockerbie North public open space at 9.15% of Net Developable Area. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Sequencing reading: 2014: The Sports Field Feasibility Study records 17.5 hectares of active playing space in Lockerbie North. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Sequencing reading: 2022: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work states that Lockerbie North is approved, south of Mount Fraser, and outside the WRP study area. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Sequencing reading: 2024: Beveridge Central AOS uses estimated 2024 Beveridge population of 9,120 to calculate current sport demand. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Sequencing reading: 2025-2026: Council schedules $0.311 million for Lockerbie North IT08i pedestrian signals. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Sequencing reading: 2026-2027: Council schedules $0.249 million for Lockerbie North C02i community centre planning. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Sequencing reading: 2026-2027: Council schedules $0.216 million for Lockerbie North OS02i sports pavilion design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Sequencing reading: 2026-2027: Council schedules $1.053 million for Lockerbie North OS01i active open space design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Sequencing reading: 2027-2028: Council schedules $5.185 million for Lockerbie North C02ii community centre design and construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Sequencing reading: 2027-2028: Council schedules $0.971 million for Lockerbie North OS02ii sports pavilion construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Sequencing reading: 2027-2028: Council schedules $4.739 million for Lockerbie North OS01ii active open space construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Sequencing reading: 2028-2029: Council schedules $20.493 million for Lockerbie North C02iii community centre construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Sequencing reading: 2028-2029: Council schedules $0.971 million for Lockerbie North OS02iii sports pavilion construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Sequencing reading: 2028-2029: Council schedules $4.739 million for Lockerbie North OS01iii active open space construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Sequencing reading: 2029-2030: Council schedules $20.493 million for Lockerbie North C02iv community centre construction year 3. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Sequencing reading: 2029-2030: Council schedules $0.032 million for Lockerbie North OS04i sports pavilion planning and design year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Sequencing reading: 2029-2030: Council schedules $0.025 million for Lockerbie North OS05i sports pavilion planning and design year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Sequencing reading: 2029-2030: Council schedules $0.205 million for Lockerbie North OS03i active open space planning and design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Sequencing reading: 2030-2031: Council schedules $0.295 million for Lockerbie North C03i community centre planning. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Sequencing reading: 2030-2031: Council schedules $0.302 million for Lockerbie North OS04ii sports pavilion planning and design year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Sequencing reading: 2030-2031: Council schedules $0.229 million for Lockerbie North OS05ii sports pavilion planning and design year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Sequencing reading: 2030-2031: Council schedules $1.913 million for Lockerbie North OS03ii active open space construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Sequencing reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $0.826 million for Lockerbie North C03ii community centre design. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Sequencing reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $0.911 million for Lockerbie North OS04iii sports pavilion construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Sequencing reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $0.692 million for Lockerbie North OS05iii sports pavilion construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Sequencing reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $8.616 million for Lockerbie North OS03iii active open space construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Sequencing reading: 2031-2032: Council schedules $10.247 million for Lockerbie North C03iii community centre construction year 1. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Sequencing reading: 2032-2033: Council schedules $0.911 million for Lockerbie North OS04iv sports pavilion construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Sequencing reading: 2032-2033: Council schedules $0.692 million for Lockerbie North OS05iv sports pavilion construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Sequencing reading: 2032-2033: Council schedules $8.616 million for Lockerbie North OS03iv active open space construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Sequencing reading: 2033-2034: Council schedules $10.247 million for Lockerbie North C03iv community centre construction year 2. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Sequencing reading: 2026-2027: Council schedules $0.155 million for Lockerbie North Indoor Recreation (F) pre-planning. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Sequencing reading: Gross-to-net feasibility must subtract the 9.15% public-open-space contribution from Net Developable Area assumptions before residual land-value testing. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Sequencing reading: The 5.9% active-open-space component is not interchangeable with passive open space because it must accommodate sports fields, courts, pavilions, lighting, and high-use turf or synthetic-surface decisions. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Sequencing reading: The 3.24% passive-open-space component matters for walkability and neighbourhood amenity but does not by itself satisfy the 17.5 hectare active-playing-space program. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Sequencing reading: Because the 8.0 hectare reserve is co-located with an indoor recreation facility and a school, delivery risk includes education-land timing and indoor-recreation funding risk. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Sequencing reading: Because the 9.5 hectare reserve is co-located with schools and court-based sport, feasibility includes peak traffic, safe access, car parking, lighting spill, and shared-use governance. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Sequencing reading: The $104.334 million Lockerbie North ledger shows that development feasibility is exposed to municipal capital timing as well as private subdivision timing. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Sequencing reading: The $58.096 million confirmed-contribution component reduces but does not eliminate delivery risk because confirmed contributions still have to arrive on the schedule assumed by Council. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Sequencing reading: The $46.083 million reserve-funded component depends on restricted reserves being sufficient and available for the specific project purposes. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Sequencing reading: The $0.155 million indoor recreation pre-planning item is a small dollar amount relative to the ledger but a large dependency signal because it is fully unconfirmed grant dependent. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Sequencing reading: The budget warning that development contributions rarely fully fund identified infrastructure means DCP feasibility should include escalation and funding-gap sensitivity tests. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Sequencing reading: The budget warning that market conditions affect contribution flows means slower lot sales can delay infrastructure that later residents still need. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Sequencing reading: The financial-plan expectation of $93.66 million in 2026-2027 works-in-kind across several growth areas means developer capacity and agreement timing are material to Council-wide delivery. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Sequencing reading: The Beveridge Central reliance on Lockerbie North tennis facilities means delay in Lockerbie North courts can produce service deficits outside the Lockerbie North boundary. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Sequencing reading: The projected Beveridge growth to 112,187 people by 2046 means active-open-space under-delivery compounds across a much larger future catchment than the 2024 population of 9,120. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Sequencing reading: The 2024 demand estimate of 42 cricket teams and 88 soccer teams means field demand is already measurable before the full 2046 population is reached. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Sequencing reading: The railway-line barrier between Donnybrook, Lockerbie, and Lockerbie North means cross-boundary service sharing is only feasible if physical access is resolved. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Sequencing reading: Lockerbie North being outside the Wallan Regional Park study area means developers should not assume future regional-park land acquisition will directly offset local open-space obligations. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Sequencing reading: Mount Fraser being outside Lockerbie North means the precinct cannot claim Mount Fraser as an internal open-space asset even though it shapes the broader landscape identity. (Source: final-moss-03oct13-web.txt)
Sequencing reading: The completed status of Lockerbie North reduces planning uncertainty but increases the importance of the approved DCP, because later additions to regional open space would generally require purchase or another acquisition mechanism. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Sequencing reading: The absence of the primary PSP and DCP documents in the local corpus prevents verification of charge areas, dwelling yield, road hierarchy, drainage obligations, and parcel-specific staging. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Sequencing reading: No primary submissions on the Lockerbie North PSP were located in the requested extracted Mitchell corpus. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Sequencing reading: No planning panel report for Lockerbie North was located in the requested extracted Mitchell corpus. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Sequencing reading: No advisory committee report specific to Lockerbie North was located in the requested extracted Mitchell corpus. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Sequencing reading: No primary DCP charge table for Lockerbie North was located in the requested extracted Mitchell corpus. (Source: local corpus inventory)
Sequencing reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work records contested quarry issues in nearby precincts, including proposed quarry impacts around Spring Hill, but not inside the completed Lockerbie North PSP. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Sequencing reading: The Wallan Regional Park feasibility work states that the completed Lockerbie North PSP did not reference the future WRP, which creates a policy coordination issue rather than a submission issue in the available corpus. (Source: feasibility-for-wallan-wallan-regional-park-report-2022-compressed.txt)
Sequencing reading: The Beveridge Central master plan shows a facility-program shift from tennis at Beveridge Central toward small-sided soccer, with tennis provision relying on Lockerbie North active open spaces. (Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Sequencing reading: The sports-field study and Beveridge Central master plan describe different southern Lockerbie North reserve mixes, so the final statutory reserve program requires primary PSP or later Council confirmation. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)
Sequencing reading: The 9.15% total open-space rate and 5.9% plus 3.24% component rates contain a 0.01 percentage-point arithmetic discrepancy, so downstream calculations should use the published total unless the primary DCP confirms otherwise. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt)
Sequencing reading: The budget states that development-contribution funding depends on market timing, so the capital ledger should be read as a programmed sequence rather than a guarantee of actual completion dates. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt)
Sequencing reading: The financial plan separates confirmed and unconfirmed grants or contributions, so items with unconfirmed funding should not be treated as fully funded. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt)
Sequencing reading: The local corpus contains duplicate-named extracts for the Wallan Regional Park feasibility report and the Mitchell sports-field feasibility study, so duplicate evidence should not be double counted. (Source: local filesystem inventory)

Synthesis

Lockerbie North is therefore best read as a completed PSP whose statutory certainty does not remove delivery risk: the open-space land take is fixed in the available evidence, the active-sport program is material at 17.5 hectares, the capital program is large at $104.334 million, and the missing primary PSP and DCP documents remain the main evidence gap for parcel-level feasibility. (Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: mitchell-shire-council-financial-plan-2025-2026-to-2034-2035.txt; Source: local corpus inventory)

The development-feasibility test is consequently not just whether land can be subdivided under an approved PSP; it is whether active open space, pavilions, community centres, pedestrian signals, indoor recreation planning, school co-location, and cross-boundary access are delivered in a sequence that keeps pace with Mitchell Shire growth from more than 64,000 residents toward more than 221,000 residents by 2046. (Source: mitchell-shire-council-budget-2025-2026.txt; Source: mitchell-sports-field-feasibility-study-finalsmall.txt; Source: beveridge-central-active-open-space-master-plan.txt)

Grange Planning Brain

Explorer