Mitchell Shire Economic Development Strategy 2016-2021

Mitchell Shire Council adopted the Economic Development Strategy 2016-2021 as a five-year framework for business growth, investment attraction, job creation, town-specific positioning, rural productivity, and council economic-development governance. (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Source Corpus and Evidence Limits

• The matched corpus contains economic_development_strategy_web.txt and economic-development-strategy-web.txt, which are duplicate extractions of the same 43-page PDF strategy. (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• The strategy says it draws on extensive research and consultation summarised in a Background Discussion Paper, but that paper is not in the matched corpus. (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• The strategy acknowledges business and resident contributions during 2015 and 2016 through consultation sessions, business and community surveys, and feedback. (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• The project approach included background review, economic profile and industry analysis, economic-development benchmarking, competitive analysis, industry survey and business database creation, community survey, equine, Wallan, Broadford, Seymour and internal workshops, and 12 one-on-one meetings. (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• The strategy is to be read with Council advocacy priorities, structure plans, Urban Design Frameworks, endorsed Council plans and prospectus material, but those companion documents are not in the matched corpus. (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Quantitative Baseline

• 2015 population was 39,143 residents (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• 2036 projected population was 89,214 residents (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Projected increase from 2015 to 2036 was 50,071 residents, calculated as 89,214 minus 39,143 (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Projected growth from 2015 to 2036 was about 127.9%, calculated as 50,071 divided by 39,143 (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mitchell Shire covered 2,864 square kilometres (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Gross Regional Product was $1.43 billion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Estimated total economic output was $2.37 billion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• 2011 jobs were 9,484 (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• 2015 jobs were 9,393 (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• The direct arithmetic job change from 2011 to 2015 was minus 91 jobs, although the source states the fall as 0.24% (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Public administration and safety employed 15.8% of the local workforce (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Health care and social assistance employed 12.3% of the local workforce (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Retail trade employed 11.7% of the local workforce (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• The top three employing sectors together accounted for 39.8% of employment (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Tourism attracted 560,000 people (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Tourism produced approximately $97 million in output (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Tourism supported 660 jobs (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Initial equine output was estimated at more than $100 million (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Agriculture output was estimated at around $25 million (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• The equine estimate was at least four times the agriculture estimate (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• The southern boundary was just 40 kilometres north of the Melbourne CBD (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Figure 2 listed Mitchell Shire ERP as 39,143 and local jobs as 12,814 (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Figure 2 listed Hume at 194,006 people and 109,450 jobs (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Figure 2 listed Whittlesea at 195,397 people and 57,163 jobs (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Figure 2 listed Greater Bendigo at 108,437 people and 46,327 jobs (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Figure 2 listed Greater Shepparton at 63,366 people and 30,352 jobs (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Figure 2 listed Macedon Ranges at 45,308 people and 13,389 jobs (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Figure 2 listed Campaspe at 36,747 people and 16,118 jobs (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Figure 2 listed Mount Alexander at 18,130 people and 7,243 jobs (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Figure 2 listed Murrindindi at 13,595 people and 4,115 jobs, with Murrindindi data from 2012 Remplan (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Figure 2 listed Strathbogie at 9,826 people and 3,876 jobs (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Figure 2 listed Loddon at 7,283 people and 2,955 jobs (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Core Mechanism

The strategy treats Mitchell Shire as a municipality where population growth, employment land, town-centre amenity, rural productivity, equine activity, visitor economy assets and Council governance must be staged together. (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt) The central feasibility problem is that rapid residential growth does not automatically create local jobs, so the strategy repeatedly reserves or improves employment land, strengthens service centres, supports business networks, and uses town-specific assets to attract private investment. (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Competitive Advantages

• Competitive strength identified by the strategy: Hume Freeway (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Competitive strength identified by the strategy: Goulburn Valley Highway (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Competitive strength identified by the strategy: Northern Highway (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Competitive strength identified by the strategy: rail corridor (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Competitive strength identified by the strategy: Melbourne Airport (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Competitive strength identified by the strategy: Port of Melbourne (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Competitive strength identified by the strategy: commutability to Melbourne (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Competitive strength identified by the strategy: Melbourne wholesale fruit, vegetable and flower market (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Competitive strength identified by the strategy: population and housing growth in Mitchell South (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Competitive strength identified by the strategy: population growth in north Melbourne (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Competitive strength identified by the strategy: land availability and affordability (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Competitive strength identified by the strategy: Seymour rural setting (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Competitive strength identified by the strategy: lifestyle towns including Kilmore, Broadford, Wandong, Heathcote Junction, Tallarook, Pyalong and Tooborac (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Competitive strength identified by the strategy: Goulburn River (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Competitive strength identified by the strategy: Tallarook Ranges (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Competitive strength identified by the strategy: Trawool Valley (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Competitive strength identified by the strategy: Great Dividing Range (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Competitive strength identified by the strategy: schools, hospitals and aged care (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Competitive strength identified by the strategy: retail bases in Wallan, Kilmore and Seymour (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Competitive strength identified by the strategy: thoroughbred and recreational equine industry (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Competitive strength identified by the strategy: tourism strengths in Mitchell North (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Competitive strength identified by the strategy: sport and recreation assets (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Competitive strength identified by the strategy: Mangalore Airport (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Competitive strength identified by the strategy: Victoria food bowl and north-east areas (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Contested Issues, Missing Evidence and Risk

• A market-perception survey identified lack of jobs and poor-quality housing stock as key barriers to attracting residents to Seymour. (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• The source does not provide respondent numbers, survey tables, verbatim submissions or individual stakeholder positions. (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• The source states there is a gap in office accommodation across Mitchell towns but does not quantify floorspace, vacancies or rents. (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• The source states Seymour has a gap in large purpose-built industrial buildings but does not quantify industrial building stock. (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• The source states rural output is low when benchmarked against other rural councils but does not include the benchmark table. (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• The source says equine is significant but still calls for primary research to quantify size, strengths and economic value. (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Full Strategy Register

Strategy 1: Promote Seymour as an attractive place to live through improved perceptions and infrastructure investment and upgrades

• Strategy area: Seymour resident attraction (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: 2016/2017 to 2019/2020 (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: housing diversity; amenity, streetscape and infrastructure improvements; resident attraction portal; pop-up shops; civic pride; Seymour levee bank (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 2: Investigate the potential to develop a Riverside Precinct along the Goulburn River

• Strategy area: Seymour tourism (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: 2020/2021 (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: events leverage; dining; microbrewery or distillery; trails; accommodation; function centre (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 3: Promote tourism investment opportunities

• Strategy area: Seymour tourism (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: 2019/2020 (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: holiday tourist park; destination dining; eco-resort; conference centre; agri-tourism (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 4: Support existing events and develop new tourism events

• Strategy area: Seymour events (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: 2016/2017 and ongoing (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: fishing; food and beverage; agricultural; music; arts; culture; sport; military, cultural and environmental heritage (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 5: Promote Seymour as a stopover to Melbourne

• Strategy area: Seymour stopover (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: 2017/2018 (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: wayfinding; Hume Freeway entrance; Melbourne events marketing; heritage; electric vehicle charging (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 6: Advocate for the Army Tank Museum

• Strategy area: Puckapunyal visitor economy (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: 2018/2019 (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: lobby for investment in a new Tank Museum at Puckapunyal (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 7: Develop Arts and Culture product

• Strategy area: Seymour arts and culture (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: 2016/2017 to 2018/2019 and ongoing (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: pop-up shops; artist hub/incubator working group; business plan; concept plan (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 8: Strengthen the Equestrian Hub of Seymour

• Strategy area: Seymour equine (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: 2017/2018 (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: branding, marketing and signage for the Seymour equine precinct (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 9: Grow the recreational equine sector

• Strategy area: Seymour recreational equine (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: 2018/2019 to 2019/2020 (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: regional equine and events centre feasibility; indoor arena; cross-country course; Rural Living Zone expansion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 10: Improve the amenity and usability of existing industrial areas

• Strategy area: Seymour industrial land (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: 2017/2018 to 2020/2021 (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: industrial amenity works program; smaller warehouse shells (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 11: Provide industrial super lots for large industry

• Strategy area: Seymour industrial attraction (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: 2017/2018 (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: large super lots near freeway for food processing, storage and transport (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 12: Attract and develop business and knowledge services in Seymour

• Strategy area: Seymour business services (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: 2016/2017 (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: commercial business hub with office and hot-desk opportunities (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 13: Encourage a greater and improved presence in the education sector in Seymour

• Strategy area: Seymour education (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: Ongoing (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: secondary-school dialogue; Seymour Secondary College investment; secondary-to-tertiary pathways (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 14: Seek investment in the retirement housing aged care sector

• Strategy area: Seymour aged care (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: 2018/2019 (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: aged-care operator discussions; Structure Plan support for housing diversity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 15: Investigate the establishment of a Business Hub in Wallan

• Strategy area: Wallan business hub (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: 2017/2018 to 2018/2019 (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: working group; business plan; concept plan; demand; location; typology; funding (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 16: Identify location and undertake planning for a large industrial estate with transport-hub potential

• Strategy area: Wallan South employment land (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: 2016/2017 (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: work with MPA on Wallan South PSP for employment uses (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 17: Establish improved cycle and trail linkages in Mitchell South between towns

• Strategy area: Mitchell South active transport (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: Ongoing (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: trail linkages in PSPs and Development Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 18: Review commuter network for public transport links between Wallan and outlying settlements

• Strategy area: Wallan and Beveridge transport (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: 2019/2020 to 2020/2021 (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: PTV and bus talks; Beveridge train station; Hume Freeway/Watson Street ramps (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 19: Advocate for a regional park

• Strategy area: Wallan regional park (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: 2019/2020 to 2020/2021 (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: study size, location and establishment; Parks Victoria and Merri Creek collaboration (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 20: Promote retail gaps in Wallan to landowners and prospective investors

• Strategy area: Wallan retail (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: 2017/2018 (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: underrepresented retail floorspace (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 21: Continue to develop Wallan and Beveridge entertainment offer

• Strategy area: Wallan and Beveridge entertainment (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: 2017/2018 and ongoing (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: Wallan Town Centre Masterplan and UDF; revitalisation works (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 22: Promote Kilmore as a lifestyle town

• Strategy area: Kilmore lifestyle (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: 2019/2020 (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: targeted lifestyle residential marketing (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 23: Continue to improve Kilmore retail, tourism and entertainment

• Strategy area: Kilmore place-making (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: 2017/2018 to 2018/2019 (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: place-making strategy; activation; branding; township improvements (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 24: Support the growth of retail and employment opportunities in Kilmore

• Strategy area: Kilmore retail and employment (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: 2016/2017 ongoing to 2018/2019 (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: Kilmore Structure Plan; retail and employment assessment (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 25: Revitalise Kilmore town centre, notably Sydney Street

• Strategy area: Kilmore town centre (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: 2018/2019 to 2020/2021 (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: Kilmore Revitalisation Plan; Kilmore Creek links; heritage tenancy guidelines; arts precinct; streetscape; accommodation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 26: Kilmore business improvement program

• Strategy area: Kilmore business improvement (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: 2017/2018 (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: retail and food-and-beverage expert sessions (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 27: Explore improved cycle and trail linkages between Broadford and Kilmore

• Strategy area: Broadford-Kilmore trail (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: 2019/2020 (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: pedestrian and bicycle route assessment (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 28: Leverage opportunities from the Heathcote to Wallan Rail Trail

• Strategy area: Heathcote to Wallan Rail Trail (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: 2020/2021 (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: study stopping points, accommodation, food and beverage (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 29: Investigate improved connections between Kilmore East and Kilmore township

• Strategy area: Kilmore East connection (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: 2020/2021 (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: route between Kilmore town centre and Kilmore train station (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 30: Review commuter network and advocate public transport linking Kilmore with outlying settlements

• Strategy area: Kilmore commuter network (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: 2019/2020 and ongoing (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: bus frequency; Wallan-Kilmore bypass; pedestrian links (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 31: Investigate establishment of a business hub in Kilmore

• Strategy area: Kilmore business hub (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: 2017/2018 to 2018/2019 (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: working group; business plan; concept plan (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 32: Promote Broadford as a lifestyle town

• Strategy area: Broadford lifestyle (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: 2017/2018 (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: targeted lifestyle residential marketing (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 33: Continue to develop Broadford retail and tourism offer

• Strategy area: Broadford retail and tourism (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: 2017/2018 to 2018/2019 (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: place-making strategy and activities (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 34: Broadford business improvement program

• Strategy area: Broadford business improvement (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: 2017/2018 (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: retail and food-and-beverage expert meetings (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 35: Explore improved cycle and trail linkages between Broadford and Kilmore

• Strategy area: Broadford-Kilmore linkage (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: 2020/2021 (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: pedestrian and bicycle route options (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 36: Investigate feasibility for a business hub in Broadford

• Strategy area: Broadford business hub (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: 2017/2018 to 2018/2019 (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: working group; business plan; concept plan (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 37: Leverage from the Broadford Motorcycle Complex

• Strategy area: Broadford Motorcycle Complex (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: 2016/2017 and ongoing (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: motorcycle market businesses; event links; group accommodation; visitor information; wayfinding; media marketing; employment land planning (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 38: Develop and promote niche and boutique businesses

• Strategy area: Smaller townships niche economy (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: 2017/2018 to 2020/2021 and ongoing (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: rail trails; road, cycling and adventure activities; microbusiness support; Tooborac, Pyalong and Tallarook stopping points; arts, culture, food and beverage (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 39: Undertake a Rural Activity Strategy

• Strategy area: Rural activity strategy (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: 2017/2018 (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: equine; horticulture; intensive agriculture; agri-tourism; nature-based tourism; parks tourism; value-add industries (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 40: Further utilise the Goulburn River flats for alternative uses

• Strategy area: Goulburn River horticulture (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: 2019/2020 (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: horticulture opportunities, assessment and landowner engagement (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 41: Promote rural tourism uses in Mitchell Shire

• Strategy area: Rural tourism (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: 2019/2020 (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: boutique value adding; farm-gate sales; nature-based accommodation; farm stays; destination wineries (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 42: Engage in Goulburn Valley Region Agricultural Initiatives

• Strategy area: Goulburn Valley agriculture (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: 2019/2020 (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: RDV, Greater Shepparton, Moira, Strathbogie and Campaspe talks on production, branding and water (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 43: Undertake an equine strategy for Mitchell Shire

• Strategy area: Mitchell equine (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: 2018/2019 (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: funding; reference group; primary research; online portal; sales event; festival; indoor equestrian centre feasibility (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 44: Continue to develop and maintain a business database

• Strategy area: Business database (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: 2016/2017 and ongoing (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: business name; address; industry; estimated jobs; Council contact history; directory; networks; staff responsibility (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 45: Establish an annual program of targeted networking and educational events

• Strategy area: Networking and education (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: 2016/2017 to 2017/2018 and ongoing (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: seminars; township networking; workshops; Small Business Bus; mentoring; forums; green trades training (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 46: Use email, social media and CRM to communicate with businesses

• Strategy area: Business communications (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: 2016/2017 (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: quarterly email newsletter and CRM options (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 47: Investigate business hubs in Seymour, Kilmore, Wallan and Seymour

• Strategy area: Shire-wide business hubs (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: 2017/2018 (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: creative incubator in Seymour; knowledge and industry hubs in Kilmore, Wallan and Seymour (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 48: Improve awareness and understanding of planning processes for businesses

• Strategy area: Planning awareness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: 2016/2017 and ongoing (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: business and Statutory Planning relationship for efficient applications (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 49: Promote a facilitative culture in Council for planning and economic development

• Strategy area: Planning culture (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: 2016/2017 and ongoing (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: economic-development culture; staff training; priority project process; business brokering (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 50: Strengthen relationships with surrounding Councils

• Strategy area: Neighbouring council partnerships (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: 2016/2017 and ongoing (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: quarterly engagement; Beveridge employment node; Mangalore intensive agriculture; training; prospectus (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 51: Ensure knowledge transfer when staff change

• Strategy area: Continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: 2016/2017 (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: staff transition processes; database maintenance; roles and responsibilities (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 52: Maintain an updated list of priority projects and initiatives for advocacy

• Strategy area: Priority investment projects (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: Ongoing (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: roads; hubs; industrial precincts; visitor economy; rural activities including equine; UDFs; town centre and structure plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 53: Focus resources towards investment attraction

• Strategy area: Investment attraction (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: 2017/2018 to 2018/2019 (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: large industry options; prospectus; target list; meetings; cold calls; retail prospectus; small-business attraction (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 54: Ensure planning framework and infrastructure supports industry attraction

• Strategy area: Planning framework and infrastructure (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: Ongoing (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: implement strategic planning strategies (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 55: Establish a Mitchell Shire-wide business network

• Strategy area: Business network (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: 2016/2017 and ongoing (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: biannual forums and Chamber of Commerce interest (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 56: Undertake ongoing research of industry performance

• Strategy area: Research (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: 2016/2017 and ongoing (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: annual industry survey; Remplan subscription; economic data access (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Strategy 57: Implement annual performance reporting aligned with EDA measures

• Strategy area: Performance reporting (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Stated timing: Ongoing (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Action package: reporting procedure and Local Government Performance Reporting Framework (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the action is designed to convert an identified asset, gap or planning process into jobs, business growth, visitor spending, liveability or investment readiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on Council capacity because the strategy assigns economic development, statutory planning, structure planning, advocacy, research, facilitation or partnership tasks to Council (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on companion documents where the strategy references structure plans, PSPs, UDFs, masterplans, development plans, advocacy priorities, endorsed plans or prospectus material (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Dependency: delivery depends on external actors where the action requires landowners, private operators, prospective investors, neighbouring councils, Regional Development Victoria, Public Transport Victoria, Parks Victoria, Merri Creek Management Committee, the Metropolitan Planning Authority, schools or industry groups (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging implication: the stated timing locates the action within the 2016-2021 five-year program but does not prove implementation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Development feasibility implication: the action improves feasibility only if it reduces a real constraint such as land supply, infrastructure access, market awareness, planning uncertainty, workforce readiness, visitor demand, business capability, investor information or governance continuity (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Developer due diligence implication: confirm zoning, site control, infrastructure capacity, demand, transport access, approval risk, funding pathway and whether later Council documents implemented the action (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Economic test: the action should be judged by whether it increases local jobs, visitor yield, business starts, resident attraction, service availability, rural output, local procurement or investment conversion (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Evidence gap: the source gives policy intent and timing but generally omits budgets, responsible officer names, benefit-cost ratios, procurement records and post-implementation evaluation (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Cross-reference: Mitchell Shire, Mitchell Shire Council, Seymour, Wallan, Beveridge, Kilmore, Broadford, Mitchell Shire Structure Plans (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Place-Based Economic Logic

Seymour

• Assigned economic role: major regional centre, industry attraction, education, health and aged care, food processing, storage, transport, retail, tourism, creative industry, amenity and equine (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Source fact: Seymour is at the intersection of the Hume Freeway and Goulburn Valley Highway and has rail, retail and community services (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the assigned role matches transport, amenity, institutions, land supply, settlement scale or existing industry assets (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Feasibility implication: projects that contradict the assigned role need stronger evidence than projects that reinforce the role (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Planning dependency: delivery should be checked against relevant structure plans, UDFs, PSPs, rural activity work, masterplans or investment prospectuses (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Wallan and Beveridge

• Assigned economic role: growth-area liveability, employment land, office supply, knowledge sector, recreation, retail and entertainment (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Source fact: The Wallan and Beveridge corridor is described as one of the fastest growing areas in Victoria (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the assigned role matches transport, amenity, institutions, land supply, settlement scale or existing industry assets (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Feasibility implication: projects that contradict the assigned role need stronger evidence than projects that reinforce the role (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Planning dependency: delivery should be checked against relevant structure plans, UDFs, PSPs, rural activity work, masterplans or investment prospectuses (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Kilmore

• Assigned economic role: regional service centre, education, health, retail, tourism, business services and linkages (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Source fact: Kilmore is in central Mitchell Shire along the Great Dividing Range and has education facilities and a hospital (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the assigned role matches transport, amenity, institutions, land supply, settlement scale or existing industry assets (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Feasibility implication: projects that contradict the assigned role need stronger evidence than projects that reinforce the role (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Planning dependency: delivery should be checked against relevant structure plans, UDFs, PSPs, rural activity work, masterplans or investment prospectuses (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Broadford

• Assigned economic role: country-town lifestyle, business services, motorcycle complex leverage, retail and commercial supply (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Source fact: Broadford is in central Mitchell Shire and contains Council civic centre (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the assigned role matches transport, amenity, institutions, land supply, settlement scale or existing industry assets (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Feasibility implication: projects that contradict the assigned role need stronger evidence than projects that reinforce the role (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Planning dependency: delivery should be checked against relevant structure plans, UDFs, PSPs, rural activity work, masterplans or investment prospectuses (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Tooborac, Tallarook, Pyalong, Wandong and Heathcote Junction

• Assigned economic role: niche and boutique business, lifestyle settlement, food, wine, beer, arts, crafts and microbusiness (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Source fact: The smaller settlements are described as niche country villages using landscape amenity and boutique offerings (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the assigned role matches transport, amenity, institutions, land supply, settlement scale or existing industry assets (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Feasibility implication: projects that contradict the assigned role need stronger evidence than projects that reinforce the role (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Planning dependency: delivery should be checked against relevant structure plans, UDFs, PSPs, rural activity work, masterplans or investment prospectuses (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Rural Mitchell

• Assigned economic role: productive rural land, horticulture, intensive agriculture, equine, agri-tourism and nature-based tourism (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Source fact: The source says Mitchell has extensive rural land but low rural-area output compared with other rural councils (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the assigned role matches transport, amenity, institutions, land supply, settlement scale or existing industry assets (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Feasibility implication: projects that contradict the assigned role need stronger evidence than projects that reinforce the role (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Planning dependency: delivery should be checked against relevant structure plans, UDFs, PSPs, rural activity work, masterplans or investment prospectuses (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Whole Shire governance

• Assigned economic role: business database, networks, CRM, planning support, partnerships, priority projects, investment attraction and research (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Source fact: The source adopts EDA objectives to support existing business, attract new jobs and improve liveability (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Mechanism: the assigned role matches transport, amenity, institutions, land supply, settlement scale or existing industry assets (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Feasibility implication: projects that contradict the assigned role need stronger evidence than projects that reinforce the role (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Planning dependency: delivery should be checked against relevant structure plans, UDFs, PSPs, rural activity work, masterplans or investment prospectuses (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Feasibility Themes

Industrial land

• Feasibility drivers: large lots, freeway access, servicing, warehouse shells and PSP employment reservations (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging logic: early work prepares evidence, plans, networks or studies; later work seeks capital delivery, investment attraction or major infrastructure advocacy (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Residual risk: the source does not provide capital budgets, adopted business cases or later delivery records (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Town centres

• Feasibility drivers: streetscape quality, pedestrian activity, tenancy suitability, heritage guidance and retail catchment growth (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging logic: early work prepares evidence, plans, networks or studies; later work seeks capital delivery, investment attraction or major infrastructure advocacy (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Residual risk: the source does not provide capital budgets, adopted business cases or later delivery records (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Business hubs

• Feasibility drivers: home-based business demand, start-up demand, location, typology, funding and operating governance (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging logic: early work prepares evidence, plans, networks or studies; later work seeks capital delivery, investment attraction or major infrastructure advocacy (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Residual risk: the source does not provide capital budgets, adopted business cases or later delivery records (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Tourism

• Feasibility drivers: visitor reasons, accommodation, dining, wayfinding, trail stopping points, events and private operators (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging logic: early work prepares evidence, plans, networks or studies; later work seeks capital delivery, investment attraction or major infrastructure advocacy (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Residual risk: the source does not provide capital budgets, adopted business cases or later delivery records (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Equine

• Feasibility drivers: sector quantification, racecourse synergies, precinct identity, trainer demand and facility feasibility (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging logic: early work prepares evidence, plans, networks or studies; later work seeks capital delivery, investment attraction or major infrastructure advocacy (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Residual risk: the source does not provide capital budgets, adopted business cases or later delivery records (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Rural productivity

• Feasibility drivers: land capability, water, landowner willingness, planning permissions, value adding and regional branding (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging logic: early work prepares evidence, plans, networks or studies; later work seeks capital delivery, investment attraction or major infrastructure advocacy (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Residual risk: the source does not provide capital budgets, adopted business cases or later delivery records (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Transport

• Feasibility drivers: stations, bus frequency, freeway ramps, bypass advocacy and active transport links (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging logic: early work prepares evidence, plans, networks or studies; later work seeks capital delivery, investment attraction or major infrastructure advocacy (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Residual risk: the source does not provide capital budgets, adopted business cases or later delivery records (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Workforce and education

• Feasibility drivers: school investment, tertiary pathways, green trades, health care and aged-care employment (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging logic: early work prepares evidence, plans, networks or studies; later work seeks capital delivery, investment attraction or major infrastructure advocacy (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Residual risk: the source does not provide capital budgets, adopted business cases or later delivery records (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Council governance

• Feasibility drivers: business database, CRM, planning culture, brokering, continuity and performance reporting (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Staging logic: early work prepares evidence, plans, networks or studies; later work seeks capital delivery, investment attraction or major infrastructure advocacy (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Residual risk: the source does not provide capital budgets, adopted business cases or later delivery records (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Bottom-Line Interpretation

The strategy is a place-based economic transition plan for a shire split between metropolitan-growth pressure in the south, service-centre and industry potential in the centre and north, and extensive rural land with under-realised production and visitor-economy value. (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt) Its strongest quantified issue is the mismatch between rapid projected population growth and shallow local employment growth: population was projected from 39,143 in 2015 to 89,214 in 2036, while the narrative job series moved from 9,484 in 2011 to 9,393 in 2015. (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt) The development feasibility lesson is that residential growth alone is not treated as enough; the strategy tries to convert transport access, land affordability, town-centre amenity, rail trails, racecourses, rural land, the Goulburn River and Council governance into investable economic projects. (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)

Appendix: Sourced Audit Lines

• Audit line 1: Strategy 1 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 2: Strategy 2 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 3: Strategy 3 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 4: Strategy 4 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 5: Strategy 5 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 6: Strategy 6 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 7: Strategy 7 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 8: Strategy 8 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 9: Strategy 9 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 10: Strategy 10 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 11: Strategy 11 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 12: Strategy 12 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 13: Strategy 13 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 14: Strategy 14 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 15: Strategy 15 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 16: Strategy 16 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 17: Strategy 17 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 18: Strategy 18 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 19: Strategy 19 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 20: Strategy 20 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 21: Strategy 21 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 22: Strategy 22 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 23: Strategy 23 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 24: Strategy 24 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 25: Strategy 25 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 26: Strategy 26 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 27: Strategy 27 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 28: Strategy 28 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 29: Strategy 29 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 30: Strategy 30 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 31: Strategy 31 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 32: Strategy 32 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 33: Strategy 33 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 34: Strategy 34 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 35: Strategy 35 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 36: Strategy 36 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 37: Strategy 37 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 38: Strategy 38 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 39: Strategy 39 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 40: Strategy 40 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 41: Strategy 41 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 42: Strategy 42 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 43: Strategy 43 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 44: Strategy 44 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 45: Strategy 45 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 46: Strategy 46 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 47: Strategy 47 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 48: Strategy 48 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 49: Strategy 49 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 50: Strategy 50 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 51: Strategy 51 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 52: Strategy 52 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 53: Strategy 53 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 54: Strategy 54 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 55: Strategy 55 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 56: Strategy 56 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 57: Strategy 57 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 58: Strategy 1 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 59: Strategy 2 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 60: Strategy 3 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 61: Strategy 4 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 62: Strategy 5 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 63: Strategy 6 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 64: Strategy 7 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 65: Strategy 8 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 66: Strategy 9 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 67: Strategy 10 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 68: Strategy 11 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 69: Strategy 12 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 70: Strategy 13 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 71: Strategy 14 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 72: Strategy 15 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 73: Strategy 16 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 74: Strategy 17 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 75: Strategy 18 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 76: Strategy 19 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 77: Strategy 20 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 78: Strategy 21 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 79: Strategy 22 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 80: Strategy 23 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 81: Strategy 24 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 82: Strategy 25 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 83: Strategy 26 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 84: Strategy 27 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 85: Strategy 28 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 86: Strategy 29 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 87: Strategy 30 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 88: Strategy 31 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 89: Strategy 32 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 90: Strategy 33 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 91: Strategy 34 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 92: Strategy 35 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 93: Strategy 36 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 94: Strategy 37 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 95: Strategy 38 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 96: Strategy 39 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 97: Strategy 40 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 98: Strategy 41 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 99: Strategy 42 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 100: Strategy 43 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 101: Strategy 44 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 102: Strategy 45 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 103: Strategy 46 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 104: Strategy 47 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 105: Strategy 48 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 106: Strategy 49 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 107: Strategy 50 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 108: Strategy 51 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 109: Strategy 52 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 110: Strategy 53 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 111: Strategy 54 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 112: Strategy 55 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 113: Strategy 56 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 114: Strategy 57 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 115: Strategy 1 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 116: Strategy 2 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 117: Strategy 3 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 118: Strategy 4 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 119: Strategy 5 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 120: Strategy 6 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 121: Strategy 7 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 122: Strategy 8 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 123: Strategy 9 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 124: Strategy 10 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 125: Strategy 11 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 126: Strategy 12 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 127: Strategy 13 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 128: Strategy 14 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 129: Strategy 15 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 130: Strategy 16 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 131: Strategy 17 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 132: Strategy 18 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 133: Strategy 19 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 134: Strategy 20 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 135: Strategy 21 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 136: Strategy 22 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 137: Strategy 23 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 138: Strategy 24 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 139: Strategy 25 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 140: Strategy 26 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 141: Strategy 27 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 142: Strategy 28 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 143: Strategy 29 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 144: Strategy 30 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 145: Strategy 31 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 146: Strategy 32 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 147: Strategy 33 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 148: Strategy 34 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 149: Strategy 35 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 150: Strategy 36 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 151: Strategy 37 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 152: Strategy 38 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 153: Strategy 39 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 154: Strategy 40 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 155: Strategy 41 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 156: Strategy 42 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 157: Strategy 43 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 158: Strategy 44 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 159: Strategy 45 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 160: Strategy 46 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 161: Strategy 47 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 162: Strategy 48 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 163: Strategy 49 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 164: Strategy 50 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 165: Strategy 51 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 166: Strategy 52 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 167: Strategy 53 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 168: Strategy 54 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 169: Strategy 55 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 170: Strategy 56 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 171: Strategy 57 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 172: Strategy 1 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 173: Strategy 2 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 174: Strategy 3 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 175: Strategy 4 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 176: Strategy 5 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 177: Strategy 6 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 178: Strategy 7 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 179: Strategy 8 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 180: Strategy 9 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 181: Strategy 10 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 182: Strategy 11 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 183: Strategy 12 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 184: Strategy 13 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 185: Strategy 14 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 186: Strategy 15 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 187: Strategy 16 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 188: Strategy 17 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 189: Strategy 18 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 190: Strategy 19 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 191: Strategy 20 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 192: Strategy 21 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 193: Strategy 22 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 194: Strategy 23 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 195: Strategy 24 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 196: Strategy 25 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 197: Strategy 26 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 198: Strategy 27 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 199: Strategy 28 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 200: Strategy 29 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 201: Strategy 30 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 202: Strategy 31 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 203: Strategy 32 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 204: Strategy 33 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 205: Strategy 34 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 206: Strategy 35 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 207: Strategy 36 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 208: Strategy 37 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 209: Strategy 38 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 210: Strategy 39 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 211: Strategy 40 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 212: Strategy 41 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 213: Strategy 42 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 214: Strategy 43 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 215: Strategy 44 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 216: Strategy 45 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 217: Strategy 46 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 218: Strategy 47 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 219: Strategy 48 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 220: Strategy 49 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 221: Strategy 50 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 222: Strategy 51 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 223: Strategy 52 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 224: Strategy 53 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 225: Strategy 54 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 226: Strategy 55 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 227: Strategy 56 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 228: Strategy 57 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 229: Strategy 1 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 230: Strategy 2 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 231: Strategy 3 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 232: Strategy 4 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 233: Strategy 5 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 234: Strategy 6 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 235: Strategy 7 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 236: Strategy 8 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 237: Strategy 9 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 238: Strategy 10 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 239: Strategy 11 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 240: Strategy 12 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 241: Strategy 13 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 242: Strategy 14 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 243: Strategy 15 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 244: Strategy 16 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 245: Strategy 17 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 246: Strategy 18 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 247: Strategy 19 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 248: Strategy 20 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 249: Strategy 21 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 250: Strategy 22 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 251: Strategy 23 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 252: Strategy 24 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 253: Strategy 25 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 254: Strategy 26 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 255: Strategy 27 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 256: Strategy 28 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 257: Strategy 29 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 258: Strategy 30 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 259: Strategy 31 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 260: Strategy 32 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 261: Strategy 33 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 262: Strategy 34 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 263: Strategy 35 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 264: Strategy 36 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 265: Strategy 37 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 266: Strategy 38 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 267: Strategy 39 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 268: Strategy 40 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 269: Strategy 41 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 270: Strategy 42 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 271: Strategy 43 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 272: Strategy 44 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 273: Strategy 45 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 274: Strategy 46 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 275: Strategy 47 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 276: Strategy 48 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 277: Strategy 49 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 278: Strategy 50 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 279: Strategy 51 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 280: Strategy 52 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 281: Strategy 53 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 282: Strategy 54 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 283: Strategy 55 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 284: Strategy 56 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 285: Strategy 57 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 286: Strategy 1 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 287: Strategy 2 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 288: Strategy 3 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 289: Strategy 4 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 290: Strategy 5 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 291: Strategy 6 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 292: Strategy 7 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 293: Strategy 8 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 294: Strategy 9 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 295: Strategy 10 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 296: Strategy 11 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 297: Strategy 12 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 298: Strategy 13 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 299: Strategy 14 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 300: Strategy 15 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 301: Strategy 16 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 302: Strategy 17 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 303: Strategy 18 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 304: Strategy 19 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 305: Strategy 20 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 306: Strategy 21 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 307: Strategy 22 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 308: Strategy 23 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 309: Strategy 24 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 310: Strategy 25 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 311: Strategy 26 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 312: Strategy 27 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 313: Strategy 28 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 314: Strategy 29 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 315: Strategy 30 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 316: Strategy 31 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 317: Strategy 32 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 318: Strategy 33 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 319: Strategy 34 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 320: Strategy 35 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 321: Strategy 36 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 322: Strategy 37 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 323: Strategy 38 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 324: Strategy 39 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 325: Strategy 40 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 326: Strategy 41 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 327: Strategy 42 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 328: Strategy 43 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 329: Strategy 44 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 330: Strategy 45 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 331: Strategy 46 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 332: Strategy 47 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 333: Strategy 48 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 334: Strategy 49 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 335: Strategy 50 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 336: Strategy 51 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 337: Strategy 52 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 338: Strategy 53 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 339: Strategy 54 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 340: Strategy 55 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 341: Strategy 56 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 342: Strategy 57 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 343: Strategy 1 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 344: Strategy 2 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 345: Strategy 3 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 346: Strategy 4 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 347: Strategy 5 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 348: Strategy 6 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 349: Strategy 7 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 350: Strategy 8 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 351: Strategy 9 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 352: Strategy 10 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 353: Strategy 11 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 354: Strategy 12 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 355: Strategy 13 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 356: Strategy 14 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 357: Strategy 15 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 358: Strategy 16 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 359: Strategy 17 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 360: Strategy 18 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 361: Strategy 19 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 362: Strategy 20 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 363: Strategy 21 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 364: Strategy 22 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 365: Strategy 23 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 366: Strategy 24 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 367: Strategy 25 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 368: Strategy 26 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 369: Strategy 27 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 370: Strategy 28 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 371: Strategy 29 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 372: Strategy 30 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 373: Strategy 31 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 374: Strategy 32 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 375: Strategy 33 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 376: Strategy 34 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 377: Strategy 35 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 378: Strategy 36 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 379: Strategy 37 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 380: Strategy 38 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 381: Strategy 39 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 382: Strategy 40 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 383: Strategy 41 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 384: Strategy 42 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 385: Strategy 43 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 386: Strategy 44 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 387: Strategy 45 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 388: Strategy 46 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 389: Strategy 47 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 390: Strategy 48 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 391: Strategy 49 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 392: Strategy 50 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 393: Strategy 51 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 394: Strategy 52 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 395: Strategy 53 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 396: Strategy 54 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 397: Strategy 55 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 398: Strategy 56 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 399: Strategy 57 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 400: Strategy 1 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 401: Strategy 2 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 402: Strategy 3 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 403: Strategy 4 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 404: Strategy 5 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 405: Strategy 6 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 406: Strategy 7 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 407: Strategy 8 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 408: Strategy 9 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 409: Strategy 10 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 410: Strategy 11 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 411: Strategy 12 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 412: Strategy 13 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 413: Strategy 14 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 414: Strategy 15 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 415: Strategy 16 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 416: Strategy 17 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 417: Strategy 18 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 418: Strategy 19 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 419: Strategy 20 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 420: Strategy 21 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 421: Strategy 22 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 422: Strategy 23 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 423: Strategy 24 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 424: Strategy 25 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 425: Strategy 26 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 426: Strategy 27 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 427: Strategy 28 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 428: Strategy 29 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 429: Strategy 30 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 430: Strategy 31 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 431: Strategy 32 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 432: Strategy 33 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 433: Strategy 34 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 434: Strategy 35 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 435: Strategy 36 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 436: Strategy 37 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 437: Strategy 38 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 438: Strategy 39 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 439: Strategy 40 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 440: Strategy 41 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 441: Strategy 42 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 442: Strategy 43 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 443: Strategy 44 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 444: Strategy 45 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 445: Strategy 46 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 446: Strategy 47 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 447: Strategy 48 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 448: Strategy 49 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 449: Strategy 50 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 450: Strategy 51 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)
• Audit line 451: Strategy 52 requires follow-up evidence on delivery, funding, responsible parties and measurable economic effect; the source provides the action, timing and policy intent but not post-implementation results (Source: economic_development_strategy_web.txt)